The document outlines an assignment focused on comparing typologies of sexual offenders, emphasizing the importance of categorizing these offenders to enhance communication between the criminal justice and mental health fields. Students are required to analyze two selected typologies in terms of motivation, aggression expression, and underlying personality structure while adhering to set criteria for evaluation. The assignment aims to improve understanding and inform future research and rehabilitation efforts.

1. 9 Assignment
Assignment: Typologies of Sexual Assaults
There are many different types of sexual assaults and many
different types of offenders. Although they are different, they
can be classified in order to create a common language between
the criminal justice field and the mental health field. This in
turn will enable more accurate research, predict future offenses,
and assist in the prosecution and rehabilitation of the offenders.
In this Assignment, you compare different typologies of sexual
offenders to determine the differences in motivation, expression
of aggression, and underlining personality structure. You also
determine the best way to interview each typology of sexual
offenders.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review the Learning Resources.
Select two typologies of sexual offenders listed in the
resources.
By Day 7
In a 3- to 5- page paper:
Compare the two typologies of sexual offenders you selected by
explaining the following:

2. The motivational differences between the two typologies
The expression of aggression in the two typologies
The differences in the underlining personality structure of the
two typologies
Excellent - above expectations
Points Range:
47.25 (63%) - 52.5 (70%)
Paper demonstrates an
excellent
understanding of
all
of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and
Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including
multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and
other sources, and discerning ideas.
Points Range:
42 (56%) - 47.2 (62.93%)
Paper demonstrates a
good
understanding of
most
of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and
Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence

3. from the readings, and discerning ideas.
Points Range:
36.75 (49%) - 41.95 (55.93%)
Paper demonstrates a
fair
understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in
the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be
lacking
in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient
pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the
readings.
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 36.7 (48.93%)
Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key
points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is missing
detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent
examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
Writing
Points Range:
20.25 (27%) - 22.5 (30%)
Paper is
well
organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses
original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or
no writing and/or spelling errors, and is

4. fully
consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains
multiple
, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the
assignment.