3. 03‐02‐2015
3
• Most of our good ideas (i.e., hypothesis generation) have come from
population comparisons
• Lack of variation of exposure within high income countries
• Lack of generalizability between high income and low income
countries
• Lack of exposure in high income countries
• Importance of addressing the most important public health problems
on a global basis.
International Collaboration in Epidemiology
Primary Reasons
Pearce N. OA Epidemiology 2013 Oct 01;1(2):15.
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
Demographics
2000 population: 2,642,056
≥ 75 years: 44,243 men, 81,249 women
Mainly white and of northern European descent
2002 population: 474,572
≥ 75 years: 14,752 men, 26,024 women
Ethnic Swedes: 81%
4. 03‐02‐2015
4
• Russell Luepker
• Alan Berger
• Angela Vargas
• Kathy Doliszny
• Paul McGovern
• Susan Duval
• Lindsay Smith
• James Pankow
• Eyal Shahar
• Seungmin Lee
• Johan Herlitz
• Thomas Karlsson
• Gunar Brandrup‐Wognsen
• Ann‐Marie Svensson
• Mikael Dellborg
• Putte Abrahamsson
• Bjorn Karlson
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
International Collaboration
Minneapolis – St. Paul, Minnesota Goteborg, Sweden
• Category A (ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF)
• (+) Cardiac biomarker + [Symptoms or Q Waves or ST Depression or STEMI or Positive Imaging]
• Unexpected cardiac death with symptoms + [Q waves or ST depression or STEMI or Thrombus]
• Autopsy evidence
• Category B (cardiac biomarkers absent):
• Symptoms + Q waves
• Death with Hx CHD and Symptoms within 72 hours
• Category C (Probable MI):
• Symptoms + [Q waves of lower probability using Minnesota Code or incomplete biomarkers]
• Inconclusive autopsy
Mendis S, et al. International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:139–146
5. 03‐02‐2015
5
• How does evolution in AMI definition impact on prevalence / incidence of AMI?
• How does evolution of technology – more sensitive and specific cardiac
biomarkers – impact on prevalence / incidence of AMI?
Mendis S, et al. International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:139–146
• Objective: Identify countries with similar demographics / economics
but different processes of care to assess whether variation in practice
impacts outcomes
• Sampling scheme
• Ensure study samples are similar between countries
• Ensure completion of study samples
• Ensure accuracy of data collection
• Outcome assessment
• Identify endpoints of mutual interest
• Validate outcomes
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
International Collaboration
6. 03‐02‐2015
6
• Project Development
• Face‐to‐face meetings
• Shared effort in regard to methodology & statistical analyses
• Publications
• Discuss authorship at early stages
• Scope of project spawns many ideas and opportunities
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
International Collaboration
• Time frame: On average, every 5 years
• Study Population
• Minnesota
• Computerized list of AMIs generated by each hospital
• Random sample of AMI hospitalizations (ICD‐9 code 410) was selected
• Additional sample of UA hospitalizations (ICD‐9 code 411), some of which were AMI
• Sampling ranged from 50% to 100% of patients depending on survey year
• Sweden
• All AMI hospitalizations
• Repeat hospitalizations during same year excluded
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
Study Sampling
7. 03‐02‐2015
7
• Definition of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
• Chest Pain
• ECG indicative of AMI
• Positive cardiac biomarker (CK‐MB > 2 x ULN, troponin > 2 x ULN)
• Impact of Technologic Advancement
• Symptoms & ECG stable
• Cardiac biomarkers change with increasing sensitivity and specificity
• Technology impacts case definitions, and, hence incidence of disease
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
AMI Definition
• Minneapolis – St. Paul, Minnesota
• Acute care hospitals (N = 22), 21 participated in survey, 1 small rural hospital refused
• All of the participating hospitals had intensive care units for AMI treatment
• Cardiologists provided care in most hospitals
• Cardiac catheterization / PCI available at 12 hospitals and these hospitals accounted
for 76% of primary AMI admissions
• Goteborg, Sweden
• Two acute care hospitals (Sahlgren’s Hospital and Ostra Hospital), each serving half of
the city, both of which participated.
• Most patients admitted to CCU and received treatment from fully trained
cardiologists, cardiologists in training, or internal medicine physicians doing required
6‐month cardiology training.
• Cardiac catheterization / PCI performed at both facilities, only one provided those
services 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week. Transfer to that hospital was readily available.
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
Hospital Facilities
8. 03‐02‐2015
8
• Readily accessible
• Limited training
• Scope of data limited
• Depth of data limited
• Requires validation
Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN and Goteborg, Sweden
International Collaboration
• Time consuming
• Abstractors require training
• Increased scope of data
• Increased depth of data
• Requires validation
Administrative Data Chart Abstraction
AMI Surveys
Abstraction System
9. 03‐02‐2015
9
• Trained nurses
• Supervised by physicians
• Inter‐observer variability assessed by random re‐abstraction of charts
• Data Elements
• Past medical history
• Symptoms
• Signs
• Laboratory data (CK‐MB, troponin)
• ECGs
• Cardiac procedures
• Pharmacotherapy
• Complications
AMI Surveys
Chart Abstraction
• Laptop Computers
• Portability
• Security
• Access Database
• Multi‐user, capable of synchronizing users
• Easy to navigate (tabbed forms, check boxes, drop down selections)
• Error checking
• Ability to annotate
• Paper Documentation
• ECGs
• Diagnostic Reports (X Ray, ECG, Coronary Angiogram, PCI, CABG)
AMI Surveys
Abstraction Instrument
10. 03‐02‐2015
10
• Manual of Operations
• Document Format
• Paper: Prepare abstractors for process and work flow
• Electronic: Rapidly accessible definitions
• Content
• All variables well defined
• Identify which variable to abstract when multiple are available
• Documentation must be able to handle “what if” situations
AMI Surveys
Abstraction Instrument
• In‐hospital
• Obtained from the medical record.
• After hospital discharge, vital status obtained and after hospital discharge
from computer linkage with death certificate files provided by the Minnesota
Department of Health and the Swedish National Registry
• Minnesota Department of Health has complete death certificate records
• Sweden: Survival confirmation as well as date of death for those who died were obtained
from the Swedish National Population Registry.
AMI Surveys
Vital Status
11. 03‐02‐2015
11
• Recognition of importance of identifying trends
• Incidence of AMI
• Trends in treatment
• Pharmacologic therapies
• Diagnostic and Interventional procedures
• Case fatality
• Data Collection
• EMR permits more detailed and complete access to records
• EMR allows remote access to data
Cardiovascular Epidemiologic Studies
Current Opportunities
• Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
• Constraints on access to records
• Patients have right to opt out of studies if identified information
• Large observational studies costly
• Resources for data abstraction
Cardiovascular Epidemiologic Studies
Current Barriers