Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to 6.2.9 Final Agc Aia Joint Seminar On Ipd
Similar to 6.2.9 Final Agc Aia Joint Seminar On Ipd (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
6.2.9 Final Agc Aia Joint Seminar On Ipd
- 1. AGC AIA JOINT SEMINAR Integrated Project Delivery™ Sam Spata, AIA, LEED® AP Senior Vice President, Director HOK buildingSMART sam.spata@hok.com
- 2. HOK & IPD Context Concerns Process
- 3. CONTEXT
- 6. Project Delivery Methods O O O A C A C C GMP A T Design Bid Build Design T Build O O O A C A C Design BIM Assist + BIM A IPD C Novation A A T
- 7. O High Design / Construct Integration O O BIM A C O O IPD C A C A C A C A T Design Design Assist + BIM Design Build A Assist T A T High Client Interaction Novation Client Interaction O If Design-Build is design-to- A C budget GMP T Then IPD is design/construct-to- P3 PFI O outcome A C Design Bid Build Design / Construct Integration
- 9. Mature BIM Purpose – built models Purpose – driven exchange
- 12. Lower Satisfaction Higher 1960 A/E/C Time Owner Response 1970 Expectations Recession 1980 Recession 1990 Recession 2000 Recession Recession 2010
- 13. In recession, Owners expect more value for money In recession, A/E/C’s bid low, investment lags
- 14. Lower Satisfaction Higher 1960 Time 1970 Recession 1980 Recession 1990 Recession 2000 Recession Recession 2010
- 15. Lower Satisfaction Higher 1960 Time 1970 Recession 1980 Recession 1990 Recession 2000 Recession Recession 2010
- 16. CONCERNS
- 18. Owner Scope Labor & DPE Materials $Contractor Easily Flow$ Does Not Architect Fee General Profit ? Conditions Overhead
- 19. Owner Contractor Architect
- 20. Why How What
- 21. Relational Form of Agreement ROLE INTEGRITY RECIPROCITY FLEXIBILITY CREATION OF RESTRAINT ON POWER IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANNING CONTRACTUAL SOLIDARITY PROPRIETY OF MEANS HARMONIZATION WITH SOCIAL MATRIX EFFECTUATION OF CONSENT RESTITUTION, RELIANCE, EXPECTATIONS - David Campbell, “Ian Macneil and the Relational Theory of Contract”
- 22. Building Blueprint Binder
- 23. Challenges Owners Face • Cost – value for money • Velocity – increased speed to market • Quality – decreased tolerance for error • Complexity – increased systems integration • Risk – decreased tolerance for uncertainty
- 24. PROCESS
- 25. • Incentive Compensation Layer (ICL) • Project Management Team (PMT) • Unanimous Decision-Making • Waiver of Litigation
- 26. AIA 195 / 295 Documents
- 27. Multi-Party Agreement for IPD
- 28. Essential Features of IPD • Shared Objective • Joint Project Management • Early Participation • Shared Risk & Reward Source - Howard W. Ashcraft, Jr.; Hanson Bridgett LLP
- 29. Shared Objective qualitative & quantitative goals setting the Validated Target Program Owner’s project requirements Validated Target Cost single sum for all Direct Costs to design & (with ICL)project (also sets the ICL) build the key task timelines, milestones, target date for Validated Target Schedule Substantial Completion
- 30. Joint Project Management • Project Management Team – Executive Committee – Direction, approval & decisions • Project Implementation Team – Design and Build the Project – Key Participants, early as possible
- 31. Project Management Team • No ‘skin-in-game’ • Project • Honest broker Facilitator, if required; • Jointly selected • Enable the • Direct project cost conversation • Cost • Schedule • Reliability PMT
- 32. Project Implementation Team Cost Reimbursable Consultants & Contractors Fixed Price Consultants & Contractors
- 33. Early Participation WHAT REALIZE HOW WHO Predesign Schematic Design Construction Agency Permit Construction Closeout Design Development Documents / Bidding Traditional Agency Owner Architect Engineers GC Key Participants Subs Conceptualization Criteria Design Detailed Design Implementation Agency Coord / Construction Closeout Documents Final Buyout Agency Owner Architect Engineers GC Collaborate Subs HOW WHO WHAT REALIZE - AIA, “Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide”
- 34. Safeguard against fast & cheap Shared Risk & Reward PQA Project Quality Adjustment PSA Project Schedule Adjustment CEA Construction Efficiency Adjustment Incentive Compensation ICL Layer (ICL)
- 35. C A PQA Owner Cost Reimbursable… C A PSA Owner Cost Reimbursable… C A CEA Owner Cost Reimbursable… Contractor Architect ICL Cost Reimbursable Consultants & Contractors
- 36. Hypothetical $1,000,000 VTC PQA -$3,200 -$3,200 20% of ICL, Maximum +$8,000 -$1,600 PSA -$200/day -$200/day Late Penalty @ 1/3 of +$1,500/day Early Bonus -$100/day CEA $2,000 $2,000 savings$5,000 $10,000 $1,000 $16,000 $16,000 Profit-at-Risk + ICL $40,000 $8,000
- 37. Direct Cost Profit-at-Risk (ICL) Overhead ‘Guaranteed’ DPE Reimbursables
- 38. Shared Pain & Gain Completion Scheduled Owner pays direct costs ICL ICL pays direct costs 4% VTC Cost Completion Actual Owner pays direct costs Time
- 39. As Owner, Do We… • use a transparent & immediate decision-making process? • have knowledge regarding design & construction? • not delegate our project participation & responsibility? • know our building type? • enjoy a reputation for reliability?
- 40. Thank You
Editor's Notes
- jhcjhcjjh
- jhgcjhjh
- \"You don't always get what you pay for in life, but you almost never get what you don't pay for.\"- developer Bruce Eichner
- Broken Buildings Busted BudgetsRethinking Construction (Egan Report)
- If money can move across traditional contract boundaries, then best-for-project decisions become possible.
- OUTCOMES
- One Market Square45,000 sf tenant fit-outLEED Platinum CI10 months design & construction
- -Francis Baconessayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)