3-page double-spaced paper (~900 words). Write a comparative analysi.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•5 views

3-page double-spaced paper (~900 words). Write a comparative analysis of two works of art This paper should begin with a visual analysis of two individual pieces and, thus, will act as an expansion of your previous assignment. You must provide an evaluation of relevant similarities and differences between the pieces. Please consider the context of the artwork, such as the historic time when it was created, the purpose and function of the work, the artist's style, the artistic period, the significance of the comparison, and anything else that you feel is relevant. Also, you may want to think about how the curatorship has impacted your experience and interpretation of the works on display. the one is Port of Le Havre by Claude Monet and another one is Mermaid by Edvard Munch Picture are in attchments .

Education

Intro to Art. Spring 2015 Object Analysis/Research Paper The assignment is to write a 2-3 page paper on an art work in a New York City museum. The idea is that you will go to the museum and have a chance to see the work in person, and that what you see will help to inform your paper. On the next page, you will find a list of recommended artworks and where they are located. However, you can also choose another work from any period, region of the world, and medium – subject to my approval. If this is from a period we have not discussed yet, just make sure you’ll know how to discuss the object correctly. Conduct a visual analysis of the object. Describe what you see, and address the art historical significance of the object. Topics you could address include: · Period, Movement or Style · Medium, Materials and Techniques · Form (eg., color, composition, line) · Subject Matter · Historical Context · Function · Reception · Artistic influences · Patron Conduct research to inform your discussion. You must use TWO SOURCES. Only one may be a generic textbook like the Gombrich or the Janson. For the other, I recommend a general book on the artist, the period/movement, or the specific artwork. The source must be scholarly - e.g. a book or an article for the journal. You can obtain these from the Queens Library, or use online databases like JSTOR or GoogleScholar. Required Format: · 2-3 pages, Double spaced, 1’’ margins all around, size 12 font (Times New Roman or Arial) · At the top of the paper, please provide me the Artist, Title, Date and location of the work. · Include 2 images – 1 of the artwork, and 1 of the wall label · Include proof you went to the museum – either your receipt or ticket · Proper bibliography and citation of your sources · Andy Warhol: Campbell’s Soup Cans 1962, Gold Marilyn, or Orange Car Crash 13 times (Pop Art) .

Writing about ArtArt is a provocative medium, and your chall.docx

billylewis37150

Writing about Art Art is a provocative medium, and your challenge in writing about art may often be to define and evaluate the artist’s choices and techniques, which, according to your intellect and perception, arouse interest and convey meaning. In most cases, then, you will be translating the visual (what you see, or observe) into language (what you write). In order to do this, you will have to be extremely attentive to the characteristics of the work—your observations. This means that your description will incorporate a large portion of your essay. Remember to be attentive to the vocabulary of the discipline of Art. I f you do not know what a word means, better not to use it. You must also be able to develop a thesis statement with a detailed analysis and argument about the artwork you have chosen. Therefore, you must consider what it is you want to say, and use description to make that point. In many ways, writing an Art History essay is similar to writing other types of essays in the Humanities. It requires a clear and focused topic, an arguable thesis, an organized format and structure, clear and coherent paragraphs, and a command of grammar and style. Comparison and Contrast In many beginning Art History courses, and in more advanced ones as well, you will be asked to write a paper in which you make a comparison and contrast between two works of art. This type of essay usually requires a substantial comparative judgment of the two works, which will function as your thesis statement. One option for a thesis statement for this kind of comparative essay could be based on how you see the two works in relation to each other and to some aspect of the human condition, or culture, or history. It could be, for example, that both artists painted peasants working in a field, but one painting suggests the oneness of humans and nature, perhaps because the figures appear to be an integral part of the field in which they are working, while the other painting emphasizes the separation between humans and nature. The evidence you provide for your thesis will include your interpretation, analysis, and description of the characteristics of both works, and must at all times relate to your thesis. For example, if you are discussing horizontality or verticality, you need to first accurately and clearly describe these elements in both works and then evaluate how these visual orientations demonstrate the validity of your thesis concerning humans as a part of nature or separate from it. Unless the assignment specifies a work-by-work approach, it is usually best that you do not divide the paper into two discrete sections: a discussion of one work of art followed by a discussion of the other. Instead, each paragraph can include discussion of both works in relation to a particular element or a well thought-out combination of elements, such as color and texture. The point of comparison or contrast that each paragraph makes must, remember, .

Arts 230-week-2-individual-assignment-analyzing

shyaminfo01

1, Select a work of art of Leonardo DaVinci The last super” and w.docx

karisariddell

1, Select a work of art of Leonardo DaVinci “ The last super” and write a response that analyzes the art through the lens of a descriptive critic, an interpretive critic, and an evaluative critic. What different things would these critics have to say? Use the following guidelines: · Descriptive Critic: Address at least 3 different elements of art and/or principles of design. · Interpretive Critic: This will require research so that you can understand the subject, meaning, and intent of the work. Evaluative Critic: Use the standards of perfection, insight, and inexhaustibility (as described in the text). 2. As part of the discussion t, you made a brief exploration of a work of art “the last super”to understand its subject, meaning, and intent. In this assignment, you will explore an artwork in more depth to consider the context in which it was created. Choose any painting, and address the following: · Explain the artistic movement associated with the work of art. · Describe the style of the artist (How is the artist unique within the movement?) · Examine in some depth the influences that shaped the work. Address at least 2 of the following: oStylistic influences oSubject/content influences oCross-disciplinary influences such as literature, philosophy, music, science, technology, etc. oHistorical influences oPolitical influences · Reflect on your learning. oHow did your research enhance your appreciation of the artwork? oHow does understanding the context of a work help in interpreting it? Include the following in your paper: · Name of the painting · Name of the artist · Date created · Image of the painting Writing Requirements (APA format) · Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page, references page, image, or caption for artwork) · 1-inch margins · Double spaced · 12-point Times New Roman font · Title page · References page (minimum of 3 scholarly sources) .

A. Objectives The art historical canon privileges the Western per.docx

makdul

A. Objectives: The art historical canon privileges the Western perspective and is incomplete. Most of what we study in this chapter is based on Western art (Europe and North America). It tends to leave out artists and voices from other regions we've studied (Middle-east, Africa, South America, Oceania, Asia, Australia, and indigenous, non-white, non-CIS-gender populations). Our task - find an artist which fills in that gap. How-to: Choose a w ork from a time period covered in class this week, but from a region we didn’t discuss or didn't discuss enough (see above) Not sure how to find a work we haven’t discussed together? Here are just a few ideas to start, and I’m happy to help you find something more specific: Smithsonian Institution Collections Metropolitan Museum of Art (NYC) British Museum (London) PBS’ Art 21 (Contemporary Art) Getty Museum (LA) MoMA (NYC), SFMoMA (Bay Area), Tate Modern (London), and many more modern & contemporary Visionary Art Museum – Folk and Outsider art (Baltimore) IAIA Museum of Contemporary Native Arts (Santa Fe) Regional and local museums (like Oklahoma City Museum of Art ). Most cities have at least one, in the US and abroad. Choose a work and include this info in your journal: Metadata : artist name, title of the work, date(s), place, collection if any, medium, size, any other relevant info to help us understand the work better Image(s) of the work. Do we need to see multiple views to understand it? Why should we study it? Reference at least 2 pieces we discussed in class. How does your selection engage with the critical conversation from those pieces, and take it further? What is the critical value of your piece? (Here you should take at least 2 paragraphs to 1. Solidify the content in your mind and 2. Prove to me you know it) Why did you choose it? Your personal aesthetics - why does the piece resonate with you? (Here you should take at least 1 paragraph. Consider addressing visual elements like composition, shape, space, time, color, value, line, texture, focal point, sound, interactivity, material, place, etc.) B. This chapter deals with the aftermath of WW2. Find another work that does this - preferably from a non-Western point of view. Or, find a work that seems to be a reaction to the "splitting of the atom" and the age of nuclear power. Choose a work and include this info in your journal: Metadata : artist name, title of the work, date(s), place, collection if any, medium, size, any other relevant info to help us understand the work better Image(s) of the work. Do we need to see multiple views to understand it? If so, include those. Why should we study it? Reference the text on the post-war era / nuclear era, and other artworks we have studied/discussed. How does your selection engage with the critical conversation from those, and take it further? What is the critical value of your piece? (Here you should take at least 2 paragraphs to 1. Solidify the co.

OverviewIn this assignment, you have an opportunity to employ ar.docx

honey690131

Overview In this assignment, you have an opportunity to employ art history knowledge and comparative essay writing skills covered in this Module. You will choose a landscape artwork from Eastern culture—either Japanese or Chinese—and one Western landscape by a European or American artist. Both artworks should have been made around the same time, between the 11th and 17th centuries. You will then compare and contrast these two paintings created during the same time period but from different cultures, drawing on course vocabulary, contextual analysis, and formal analysis. Instructions Mountain with River and Trees School of/style of Wang Yuanqi. Mountain with River and Trees. ca. 1642-1715. Ink on Paper. Used with permission of the British Museum. The Eastern (Asian) landscape tradition is markedly different from that of the Western (European). Traditional Asian artists intended to evoke meditative contemplation through visual imagery using atmospheric perspective, placement, and asymmetry. Eastern works also stress a reverence for nature and often include calligraphy or poetry as part of the primary subject. What ideas do European landscapes of the same time period convey? For this assignment, you will choose one example each of paintings that represent the Eastern and Western landscape tradition from the same time period. In your essay, compare and contrast each work's individual similarities and differences and identify major contrasts in these two cultural approaches. For basic information on how to approach this comparative essay, visit the Module 5 Writing Skills page. Step 1: Research First, conduct basic research on Eastern and Western landscape paintings and create a list that includes the major ways in which they are similar and different. Then, using the Art Research Guide sources or comparable sites, browse examples of both Eastern and Western landscape art and choose two examples that allow you to write a fully-developed essay based on three or more major points of comparison. Consider the following questions as you brainstorm your comparisons: What did each artist hope to accomplish with his or her work? What aspect of the landscape did each artist most value? Did the artists demonstrate personal connections with their landscapes, or were they conveying broader cultural messages? Do the artworks represent attitudes towards nature that continue on today? Explain each consideration in detail and refer directly to how they are demonstrated in the art itself. Next, summarize the primary points you will address in one "thesis statement," which will appear as a sentence in your essay's introduction. Note that not all Eastern and Western landscapes will make strong enough statements to support a fully-developed essay. For example, if Eastern landscapes stress a reverence for nature, look for Western examples that either clearly do or do not represent the same idea. Your choices should provide you with at le.

Kandinsky 3.4 (Editable)

mjarry

This document provides instructions for a student assignment to examine a theory by Wassily Kandinsky and demonstrate how it is evident in two of his paintings. The student must: 1) Select one of Kandinsky's theories from his book Concerning the Spiritual in Art; 2) Outline the theory's main principles with quotes and explanations; 3) Annotate copies of two paintings to show how the theory is evident; 4) Explain the relationship between the theory and each painting; and 5) Write a conclusion evaluating the theory's significance. Resources on Kandinsky and his theories are provided. Achievement levels depend on completing tasks related to outlining the theory, demonstrating it in paintings, and evaluating its significance

(How to write the paper)Introduction paragraph with thesis stateme.docx

tienmixon

(How to write the paper) Introduction paragraph with thesis statement – 3 sentences maximum 2 nd paragraph – describe the subject matter (what you see in detail) + Content (what it means) 4 sentences maximum Paragraphs #3 and subsequent paragraphs – describe each element (in detail) and then each principle (in detail) Brief concluding paragraph - 3 sentences maximum **Students MUST write about 1 work of art currently on exhibition at either MFAH or Menil Collection ** Museums to Visit ( i already picket the portatrait to write about it all i need is someone to do it by tomorrow? and whoever accepts i will send them today the photo of the art. The critique paper will consist of the following: Cover Sheet must contains the following on three separate lines (Name, ARTS 1301*section #, Critique paper) 3 Full Pages, double spaced, utilizing 11point, double-spaced, TimesNewRoman font, 1” margins ONLY Paper will be stapled, NO Report Covers Paper will include description and interpretation of (1) work of art from a Houston based museum or gallery (see attached list) Opening paragraph with a thesis statement A brief overall description of the work of art and artist/culture if known. Then using the Principles and Elements of Design to examine the artwork in depth. Complete your paper with your educated interpretation of its importance and meaning All sources are cited used both within the paper (endnotes/footnotes) and using a works cited or Bibliography page Paper will include a printed out photo attached to the paper Paper will include cards, ticket stubs and other support material should be glued or taped to a separate sheet of typing or printer paper and stapled with the report. Cite the work of art discussed within your paper in the following manner. a) The artist is unknown . Separate each of the following by commas-- list the country, then region (if known), and date (bce or ce). The title is italicized. Mummy Portrait of a Man , Egypt, Fayum region Roman, 150–200 ce b) The artist is known . Separate each of the following by commas -- name (birth and death dates in parentheses), title in italics, medium, date of work René Magritte (1898–1967), L'empire des lumiéres (The Dominion of Light), oil on canvas, 1954 What to do at the museum? Take this paper with you Take your textbook with you Take notes regarding the work of art of your choice (Name of artist, title of work, date it was made, culture that made it, materials it is made from and any information that is listed on the placard accompanying the work of art. See Below Questions to help you examine the work of art Pick up documents (brochure, postcard ticket stub, or sticker) documenting that you visited the museum/gallery. Questions to help you examine the work What? What is the work of art about? Is there a narrative? Is the work figural or abstract? When? What time period or date was the work of art created? Where? Where was the work of art created? What city, sta.

COLLEGE PHYSICS LAB REPORT STUDENTS NAME ANALYSIS OF A BUBBLE CHAMBER PICTURE SUPERVISED BY: 19/05/2020 1. Introduction A bubble chamber is a vessel filled with a superheated transparent liquid (most often liquid hydrogen) used to detect electrically charged particles moving through it. It was invented in 1952 by Donald A. Glaser, for which he was awarded the 1960 Nobel Prize in Physics. A convenient way to study the properties of the fundamental subatomic particles is through observation of their bubble trails, or tracks, in a bubble chamber. Using measurements made directly on a bubble chamber photograph, we can often identify the particles from their tracks and calculate their masses and other properties. In a typical experiment, a beam of a particular type of particle is sent from an accelerator into a bubble chamber, which is a large liquid-filled vessel. To simplify the analysis of the data, the liquid used is often hydrogen, the simplest element. The use of liquid hydrogen, while it simplifies the analysis, complicates the experiment itself, since hydrogen, a gas at room temperature, liquefies only when cooled to -246◦C. For charged particles to leave tracks in passing through the chamber, the liquid must be in a “super-heated” state, in which the slightest disturbance causes boiling to occur. In practice, this is accomplished by expanding the vapor above the liquid with a piston a few thousandths of a second before the particles enter the chamber. 2. Methods 2.1 Materials needed: 1. student worksheet per student 2. Ruler 3. Scissors 4. Glue stick 5. Pocket calculator 2.2 Procedures 2.2.1 Calculation of the X Particle’s Mass. Make measurements on each of the photographs. In particular, for each of the circled events measure these four quantities: · `Σ - The length of the Σ track, · θ - the angle between the Σ− and π− track, · s - the sagitta of the π− track, · `π - The chord length of the π− track. Your values for the event should be close to those given in the sample input. Run the program using each set of measurements, and tabulate the computed X0 mass from each event. Compute an average of the calculated masses and find the average deviation, expressing your result as Mx ±∆Mx. Compare your final result with some known neutral particles listed below and identify the X0 particle based on this comparison. Particlemass (in MeV/c2) π0 135 K0 498 n 940 Λ0 1116 Σ0 1192 Ξ0 1315 2.2.2 Determination of the Angle θ. The angle θ between the π− and Σ− momentum vectors can be determined by drawing tangents to the π− and Σ− tracks at the point of the Σ− decay. We can then measure the angle between the tangents using a protractor. We can show.

Collins did not understand the events that led to the reasoning .docx

3-page double-spaced paper (~900 words). Write a comparative analysi.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from vickeryr87

More from vickeryr87 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

3-page double-spaced paper (~900 words). Write a comparative analysi.docx