The document discusses the author's experience leading the 2014 ePortfolio Summer Assessment Institute at Clemson University. Some key points:
- The institute brings together faculty from across the university to review student eportfolio artifacts and assess student learning outcomes related to general education.
- Over the course of a week, faculty participants review a random sample of student work, score it using rubrics, and discuss the results in order to provide feedback on curriculum and encourage adjustments to courses and assignments.
- Participating in the institute multiple times helps faculty better understand the eportfolio program and how to align their teaching with competencies.
- The author believes the collaborative process is valuable for engaging faculty in reflection on curriculum improvement and
Improving Retention in Online Courses -- Inside HigherEd webinarPatrick Lowenthal
Improving Student Retention in Online Learning
Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:00:00 AM MDT - 12:00:00 PM MDT
Online learning continues to grow and make up a larger percentage of enrollments in higher education. However, over the years, institutions often report higher attrition rates for online courses than traditional face-to-face courses. As enrollments in online courses increase and online learning becomes a larger part of institutions' long-term planning, faculty and administrators are confronted with finding ways to improve retention in online courses and online programs. In this free webinar, presented by Academic Partnerships, the literature on attrition in online learning will be discussed as well as various strategies used to improve student retention in online learning.
The Center is a new next-gen, social online learning community designed to connect California's 112 community colleges, foster innovation, and promote sharing. All Center events are free and open to the public. The Center is brought to you by @ONE (www.onefortraining.org).
Improving Retention in Online Courses -- Inside HigherEd webinarPatrick Lowenthal
Improving Student Retention in Online Learning
Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:00:00 AM MDT - 12:00:00 PM MDT
Online learning continues to grow and make up a larger percentage of enrollments in higher education. However, over the years, institutions often report higher attrition rates for online courses than traditional face-to-face courses. As enrollments in online courses increase and online learning becomes a larger part of institutions' long-term planning, faculty and administrators are confronted with finding ways to improve retention in online courses and online programs. In this free webinar, presented by Academic Partnerships, the literature on attrition in online learning will be discussed as well as various strategies used to improve student retention in online learning.
The Center is a new next-gen, social online learning community designed to connect California's 112 community colleges, foster innovation, and promote sharing. All Center events are free and open to the public. The Center is brought to you by @ONE (www.onefortraining.org).
Running head: ACADEMIC PROGRAM 4
ACADEMIC PROGRAM
Name
Institution
Academic Program
An effective recommendation for an academic program should have the following characteristics:
· Should consider the age of the learners
· Should consider the education requirements of the learners
· Should be geared towards improving the quality of education
· Should be realistic and have a time frame within which to achieve.
· Should go hand in hand with the way the world is moving
An example of such a recommendation is introducing a policy to ensure all students do a science subject to enhance innovation since the world is technology-based. This recommendation is effective since it goes hand in hand with the way the world is moving and is considering the education requirements of the learners. I will use the module resources to make my recommendation effective when implemented, will involve all people when making decisions regarding the improvement of the academic program.
The review of the undergraduate project is effective, and it is well organized. The review focuses on specific objectives that need to be met, and the writer is keen to note the objectives down and to make sure that the review achieves these objectives. It is also essential that the review was done after the report was conducted, and there was the involvement of all the members of the faculty. This is important as it helps the institution to develop a greater insight and to capture as much as possible opinions that will be used in the improvement of the program. This is great.
The document on the California state university is essential. This is because it brings out the report on the review in an authentic manner, and this is important for effective program improvement in the university. The review is essential as it helps to understand what can be done and what is necessary. The involvement of many of the people in the university is good as it helps even to bring out even a better review and improvement program.
References
Redman,C.L, Withycombe, L & Wiek,A. (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development.6(2).203-218.
Julia Discussion:
Hi everyone.
I chose to evaluate the English Program at Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville for this discussion. Some of the characteristics of an effective program review will include whether or not student learning is assessed, how it is being assessed, any challenges to assessment from faculty or students, what is working well with the process, what did not work well, and recommendations for improvement. The assessment from this particular University was interesting because it seemed to be infused with a lot of personality from the assessors.
The assessment was conducted during 2009 and it also happened to be taking place while the department was introducing a new curriculum. The faculty were introducing this curriculum ...
Initial IdentificationWhen you hear the word college, you mighsamirapdcosden
Initial Identification
When you hear the word "college," you might picture students hanging out in their dorm rooms or packing into large lecture halls for their studies. However, when more and more learning methods are made possible by technology, that representation is dated more and more. Indeed, the popularity of online and distant learning among college students has consistently grown, but does that indicate it's a good fit for you? To help you respond to that question, spend some time contrasting traditional versus online schooling. Since both traditional and online learning have benefits and drawbacks, students should be prepared before entering the classroom (or logging in). This head-to-head comparison concentrated on three crucial components that affect a student's experience. We'll also examine the advantages of "mixed learning" in more detail.
The project encourages Macomb Community College to increase the number of classes it provides to students, both in the physical classrooms and online. College is a time for self-discovery, and there is no better way to figure out one's capabilities and areas of interest than by enrolling in a wide array of subjects during your time there. Macomb analyses data on student learning to pinpoint areas that could benefit from altered rules and procedures. In order to improve the college's Academic Mobility Policy, data on student success is used. This policy establishes a procedure for ensuring that students are enrolled in the proper classes. The set course prerequisites must be met by all students enrolling in English composition, mathematics, reading, and English for Academic Purposes (EAPP) courses. The college has a "mobility period" in place to make sure that students are adequately positioned for success in these foundational courses. Math and English are the subjects where mobility happens the most frequently. As a student, I have participated in a diverse range of classes, and I never stop being astonished by the extent to which the topics overlap.
The Center for Teaching and Learning used the assessment results to provide additional opportunities and resources to support faculty initiatives to integrate communication-based teaching methods into their lessons. On the Macomb Community College Portal, a page titled "Using Assessment Results" was made with resources highlighting communication strategies faculty members can use. Workshops highlighting methods for assisting students in becoming successful researchers, thinkers, and writers in the disciplines were available as professional development opportunities. A book discussion on John C. Bean's book Engaging Ideas - The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical-Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom was also provided by the Center for Teaching and Learning (2011). The focus of the faculty discussion was developing stimulating writing and critical thinking exercises and approaches.
For instance, completing classes in hi ...
UofSC Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support Directors Meeting - January 15, 2019
Featuring remarks from Kirsten Kennedy, AVP for Student Housing and Well-Being; Pam Bowers, AVP for Planning, Assessment and Innovation; and Dennis Pruitt, VP for Student Affairs and Vice Provost
The Office of Career Services and Student Employment and Placement Assistance held the University of Pittsburgh Fall 2010 Career Fair at the Peterson Events Center on September 30th, 2011. The ACPA Commission for Student Involvement featured the event in their newsletter.
IoT Research Paper Assignment Component Proficient (15 to .docxvrickens
IoT Research Paper Assignment
Component
Proficient (15 to 20 points)
Competent (8 to 14 points)
Novice (1 to 7 points)
Score
Assignment Requirements
Student completed all required portions of the assignment
Completed portions of the assignment
Did not complete the required assignment.
Writing Skills, Grammar, and APA Formatting
Assignment strongly demonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
Assignment is well written, and ideas are well developed and explained. Demonstrates strong writing skills. Student paid close attention to spelling and punctuation. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct.
Proper use of APA formatting. Properly and explicitly cited outside resources. Reference list matches citations.
Assignment demonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
Assignment is effectively communicated, but some sections lacking clarity. Student paid some attention to spelling and punctuation, but there are errors within the writing. Needs attention to proper writing skills.
Use of APA formatting and citations of outside resources, but has a few instances in which proper citations are missing.
Assignment does not demonstrate graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
Assignment is poorly written and confusing. Ideas are not communicated effectively. Student paid no attention to spelling and punctuation. Demonstrates poor writing skills.
The assignment lacks the use of APA formatting and does not provide proper citations or includes no citations.
Maintains purpose/focus
Submission is well organized and has a tight and cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the document
Submissions has an organizational structure and the focus is clear throughout.
Submission lacks focus or contains major drifts in focus
Understanding of Course Content
Student demonstrates understand of course content and knowledge.
Student demonstrates some understanding of course content and knowledge.
Student does not demonstrate understanding of course content and knowledge.
Impact of IoT on Work Environment
Student strongly demonstrates the practical application, or ability to apply, the course objectives to the impact of IoT in a work environment.
Student demonstrates some practical application, or ability to apply, the course objectives to the impact of IoT in a work environment.
Student does not demonstrate the practical application, or ability to apply, the course objectives to the impact of IoT in a work environment.
Student #1
Professor Howard
ENGL 1301, Sec. 53401
September 26, 2017
Annotated Bibliography
Bidwell, Allie. “Second-Guessing Online Education.” U.S. News Digital Weekly, vol. 5, no. 42, 18 Oct. 2013, p. 8. EBSCOhost.
In the article “Second-Guessing Online Education” Bidwell discusses others views on online education. This article’s main point is to discuss what American’s think about ...
Hey Carzetta, You did a beautiful job on your char.docxhanneloremccaffery
Hey Carzetta,
You did a beautiful job on your chart :) it's very well laid out I liked how you said " For accountability, the teaching staffs will be assessed before and after the semester to ensure the Accreditation standards are met." like (Diamond, 2008 p.16) said in years past , an institution could simply dust off its previous documents, make a few modest modifications, and be finished, but this is simply no longer possible. im glad you will be reviewing staff and faculty consistently to make sure they are meeting the accreditation standards excellent post.
Hello Carzetta,
How are you? I think you did a good job on this post.
My feedback:
Clarification: Is the information practical? Does it make sense?
The information is practical. The table is perfect, it is organized and easy to read. But, I find the Outcome section unclear. Also, there was no reference section.
Justification: Does the entry include adequate details to justify the direction being taken?
The entry in the outcome section does not include details to justify the direction being taken. The outcome should be based on, as the University Office of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness (n. d.). stresses that there are going to be questions to answer upon graduation. What the graduates know and are able to do at the time they have completed the program?” What is going to happen at the end of the program?
Rationale: Have sufficient references been included to support the direction being adopted?
No, there are no references to support the direction being adopted.
Relevance: Do you have (or have you heard of) similar experiences that you can share?
Your program really hit home for me! Meaning that, I took numerous classes in your curriculum while waiting to be accepted into the nursing program. Long story short, as we, my classmates and I got to the folk in the road, some went into Biomedical science program and natural sciences program while, I chose education.
Recommendations: Do you have suggestions or advice that you can share?
There are two areas that is in need of assistance. The Outcome section and the reference section:
Firstly, the Outcome section, as the University Office of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness (n. d.) states, that program outcomes are attainment, skills, and competencies students should acquire upon graduation from your program in Biomedical Science.
Secondly, I think your report needs one or two references, which will add some credibility to your project.
Again, I think you did a great job with the table, all it needs is a little help in the areas in the recommendation section.
Thanks for sharing,
Hello Carzetta
I really liked reading about your program outcomes and list of courses. However I was wondering what are your program outcomes? You supplied great information on what a program outcome was and why it is needed which was very informational and helped grow my knowledge and understanding but I did not see your outcomes listed.
The c.
Expanding the Help: Assessing the Effectiveness of Academic Mentors in Upperc...Tom Durkee
This Powerpoint was created to outline Nicole Cartier & Tom Durkee's assessment of the academic mentor program within Residence Life at Salem State University.
Considerable research has been conducted on the effects of various learning delivery modes in an academic environment. However, the number of studies that look into learning delivery modes effects in professional environment are scarce. In the context of a large professional public-sector organization, this research attempts to identify roles played by prospective participants’ perceptions on different learning delivery modes into their decisions on participating in organized training programs. The study focuses on Face-to-Face, Online, and Blended modes of learning to conduct research. It utilizes an online survey to collect and analyze data from past participants of administered training sessions by the organization. By incorporating a combination of qualitative as well as quantitative questions in the survey, the study collects data on participant satisfaction, familiarity, and overall perceptions on various learning delivery modes. The findings from the study identify that participants value social interaction and networking opportunities offered at a training session. It also identifies that even though participants may have their personal preferences towards various learning delivery modes, they are mostly open to the idea of learning in a different mode, provided a conducive learning environment is created.
Enabling professional development by letting go of the pedagogical paradigmsMatt Cornock
Annotated slides from reflective session paper presented at the ALT Conference, 4 September 2019, Edinburgh, UK. This presentation is relevant to all learning designers, learning technologists and online practitioners navigating the literature, research and data around online learning design for professional development. It concludes with an argument for open pedagogy, that is not defined on design, but is experienced based on learner choice.
Net(work) yourself a job? CETL student engagement and employabilitycilass.slideshare
Laura Jenkins & Sabine Little from CILASS and Louise Goldring from CEEBL lead a discussion session at the CETL student Network conference, University of Plymouth June 2008
2. 1
Fall 2014
A Message from AAEEBL’s Board Chair
It was a great pleasure
to see so many of you (280,
to be exact) at the AAEEBL
Annual Conference in Boston
this past July. Judging from
the sessions I attended and
the comments I heard from
others, the conference was
a wonderful success; the
Ignite sessions were perhaps the biggest hit, along
with the excellent plenary sessions offered by Bret
Eynon and Laura Gambino, Kathy Takayama, and Bryan
Alexander. The most important take-away for me this
year was the sense that the inter/national conversation
about ePortfolios is becoming increasingly rich and
sophisticated, as ePortfolios continue to emerge as a
field of practice with its own theoretical underpinnings
and body of evidence-based research. I spoke with
many other conference participants who voiced this
impression. It’s gratifying to know that AAEEBL, as the
nexus for exchange among ePortfolio practitioners and
researchers, has played a central role in encouraging
and catalyzing these developments.
Let me also congratulate Trent, Judy, and the
respective planning committees for AAEEBL’s two
successful regional conferences in November, the
Southeast Regional Conference at the University of
Georgia and the Midwest conference in Chicago. I
attended the Chicago meeting where the discussions
were again both provocative and sophisticated in their
approaches to eportfolio practice.
Now it’s time to look toward the next annual
conference and to mark your calendars for July 27-
30, 2015 in Boston. The theme will be “Beyond ‘One
Size Fits All,’” with a focus on three “Targets for
Transformation”: Evidence-Based Learning; Personalized
Learning Paths; and Holistic Outcomes Assessment.
Expect to see the Call for Proposals in your inbox soon.
Happy holidays to you all—I’m looking forward to a year
of continued advancement of the ePortfolio field and to
seeing you at AAEEBL national and regional events.
All the best,
Susan Kahn
2 What I Did on my Summer Vacation, by
Gail Ring, Clemson University
4 Cindy’s Column: Embodied Learning,
by Cindy Stevens, Wentworth Institute of
Technology
5 What can you Expect from an AAEEBL
Summit?
6 AAEEBL’s 2014 Executive Summit:
Embodying the Path, by Marc Zaldivar,
Virginia Tech
7 Think About It, by Julie Ambrose, Lehigh
Carbon Community College
8 Campus Conversations: G. Alex Ambrose
13 Earn AAEEBL-Credentialed Badges and
Contribute to the AAEEBL Community
Online (ACO), by Kathryn Coleman,
Deakin University
15 A Message from you AAEEBL Co-Leaders,
by Trent and Judy Batson
17 New Resources Featured on the AAEEBL
Online Community
18 Calendar of Events 2014-2015
We hope you like our new look as TAL
continues to evolve. This issue features a
stunning cover by designer Rob Fabiano,
contributions from knowledgeable and
talented leaders in the field and a fine layout
design by Wentworth Institute of Technology
Coop student, Megan Savage.
Ideas or feedback?
Let us know how we're doing!
3. 2
Fall 2014
What I Did on my Summer Vacation
Continued on Page 3
I led the 2014 ePortfolio Summer Assessment Institute. Ok, let me back up and give you a bit of history
and context. Here are a few things that you should know:
• Clemson uses the evidence in undergraduate students’ eportfolios for the assessment of our
General Education program.
• Until recently, the eportfolio was a graduation requirement for all undergraduates.
• As the Director of Clemson’s ePortfolio Program, part of my job is to facilitate the ongoing
assessment of student learning outcomes related to general education.
Though the primary purpose of the ePortfolio Program is the assessment of our General Education
curriculum, we believe that engaging students in purposeful and ongoing eportfolio development
encourages critical self-reflection and analysis, adding value to their collegiate experience. It is through
the selection of appropriate college-level work, and the articulation of how that work demonstrates the
competency that students begin the process of organizing and evaluating their experiences.
Each summer I bring together a group of faculty from across the university to review these student
artifacts. This process occurs over the course of one week and is intended to provide insight on the quality
of student artifacts, clarity of the competencies, and usefulness of the scoring rubrics. In the next few
paragraphs I will share why I think this is the best way to spend your summer.
There are three primary goals for the Summer Assessment Institute: expand faculty knowledge of the
ePortfolio Program while correcting possible misconceptions they may have, conduct an assessment of
student artifacts, and engage in course/programmatic revision based on the review of these artifacts. In
our model, faculty participants review a stratified, random sample of student artifacts from the previous
academic year to ensure student work from all majors for all competencies is sampled. To increase the
sample size, the number of faculty assessors increases most years.
The first thing on the agenda is introductions, but with a twist. In addition to introducing themselves
and telling everyone what they teach and in which department they reside, each participant must mention
one thing they [think they] know about the ePortfolio Program. The word think is important because we
find that what participants know isn’t always accurate. In addition, everyone must mention something that
hasn’t already been said and each statement is written on the white board where it will remain for the rest
of the week serving as a reminder of these misconceptions. We have found this activity to be invaluable
as we begin our work for the week. The process of asking faculty what they know and how they know it,
and correcting possible misconceptions immediately opens their eyes to the vast amount of misinformation
surrounding this program. Equally important is identifying what the sources of the misinformation are.
Each summer first-time faculty participants as well as those that have participated once or twice
previously are invited. Although we find participating in the institute is beneficial in eliminating or
reducing misconceptions, we have found that most participants don’t fully understand the Program and
begun to adjust their courses and assignments until after their second or third year of participation.
Faculty participants are paired based on competency and discipline, for example a math professor and
an engineering professor would be paired to review mathematics artifacts while a psychology professor
might be paired with a sociology professor to review social science artifacts. The reviewers then retrieve a
random sample of student work from all undergraduates across all colleges. Using the rubric developed and
refined over the years by groups similar to this one, these artifacts are not re-graded, but assessed based
on how well they meet the competency.
Next, participants are divided into content/competency groups and meet with the faculty facilitator
for their competency. Here they can ask questions about the assessment process and the facilitator will
provide information on the types of artifacts that are commonly seen, and which ones demonstrate the
competency well and which do not. Next, the groups achieve inter-rater reliability through a practice
Gail Ring
Director, ePortolio Program
Clemson University
4. 3
Fall 2014
Continued from Page 2
scoring session in which they look at student artifacts, score them using the rubrics, and discuss their
results. This continues until they have reached consensus on the scores promoting the process of review
and discussion. The intention of this iterative, collaborative process is to encourage participants to think
about their courses and assignments so that they can begin to “tweak” them to better demonstrate the
competencies. A follow-up session the next summer provides another opportunity to review student work
and continued tweaking, as necessary.
You may be asking yourself why I think this is such fun. Well, because interspersed with the hard work of
assessment are extremely powerful conversations about learning, participant presentations about how they
fine-tuned their courses and assignments, and discussions centered on student learning.
I am not the only one who sees a benefit to this process as evidenced in the comments below from our
participants.
“The eportfolio has made me a better teacher, it gives me a chance to reflect and see what my students
are really learning in my class.”
“I have come to appreciate how it serves and is an effective assessment instrument for the University.
That it isn’t so nebulous; it is simple and effective. That as an educational tool it provides good data on the
competencies.”
“Helped me understand what the competency requirement is and as a result I
have changed the way I teach to shift toward a more critical analysis of the Social
Science methodologies. Currently the assignment works, but I plan to tweak it so
it works better for more students.”
In the video linked to his picture (left), Jim, a history professor, discusses
how minor tweaks to courses and assignments can be made by faculty to align
both with the core task of the competency.
We will continue to build on the success of the Institute, introducing new
faculty each year in an attempt to transform the undergraduate curriculum. We
believe the opportunity to participate in this authentic assessment of student
work is a powerful way to engage faculty in the sometimes difficult process
of reflection on and the continuous improvement of the general education
curriculum.
Many people who wanted to attend AAEEBL 2014 in Boston were not able to join us. To share the
conference experience with them, and with anyone who wants to learn more about your topic, we’re
assembling an AAEEBL 2014 resource webpage and need your help to make sure it’s complete. If you
were a featured speaker or a workshop, session, panel, poster or Ignite session presenter, please share
any or all of the following by December 10:
• The title of your session with names of presenters with whom you shared the spotlight.
Include institutions, and add Ph.D. or other designations to names as you wish to be
represented.
• PowerPoint (or other) presentations, preferably saved as a PDF.
• Links to any web sites or resource pages you shared during your presentation.
• Copies of session hand-outs provided to attendees.
• Any other relevant links to materials such as YouTube videos or institutional sites pertinent for
sharing as a resource related to your presentation.
Many people mentioned that AAEEBL 2015 was a significant moment indicative of the way
eportfolios are evolving and advancing as a significant field in practice and research The presentations
exemplified this. Please make sure you’re included in this valuable and important collection. Send
material to judy@aaeebl.org by December 20.
Calling all AAEEBL 2014 conference presenters!
We need your help!
5. 4
Fall 2014
Cindy’s Column: Embodied Learning
Cindy Stevens, Ph.D.
Professor, Co-Editor of the
AAEEBL Learner
Wentworth Institute of Technology
I learn so much at the AAEEBL Boston conferences
every year and this past July 2014 conference was no
different. This year what stood out to me the most
was the Executive Summit session. In the Wentworth
management department we struggle with student
reflection pertaining to all work and all levels from
freshman to senior years. The Executive Summit
workshop provided some excellent tools to consider
for eportfolio reflection, as well as general student or
group work learning experiences. I found myself taking
as many notes at this session as possible and I was
truly surprised to discover that the group workshop
exercise truly worked for me. I had such a deep learning
experience with the break out session that I decided to
try a few ideas in my own classroom.
Before I describe what I tried in the classroom,
I feel like I should provide you with a few details about
the session and why it was so transformative for
me. At the Executive Summit, Melissa Peet discussed
the difference between disembodied and embodied
learning experiences and also how to ask students the
right questions to help with reflection and a deeper
learning experience. After listening and absorbing
what Melissa said, I realized I am a culprit of pretty
much asking disembodied questions for who knows
how long. In short, a disembodied question might ask
what did you learn and an embodied question might
ask what frustrated you. This was very interesting to
me, because I am a true believer that we learn through
experiences - both good and bad. I thought to myself
then, why have I not approached student learning like
this? This is how I live my personal life. Why haven’t
I brought these ideas into student experiences?
However, I was not quite convinced. It wasn’t till
Melissa had us break out into groups with total
strangers and follow through with a set of embodied
questions to answer and share with each other. As we
answered these questions provided to us, reflecting
privately to ourselves, it wasn’t until we each shared
our answers with total strangers that themes began
to emerge for each of us. The theme that surfaced for
me truly offered an, a-ha moment. I discovered through
this break out workshop session that true reflection
needed to start with an embodied question, private
reflection, and then finally follow up with telling my
story to others. Telling my ideas to someone who
does not know me allowed me to open up and not
worry about what they thought. These strangers
also helped me to see themes emerge along the
way. Now, I know this might all seem somewhat
vague or confusing to anyone reading this article.
I will be happy to share a few more details if anyone
wants to email me. Also, I am sure Melissa Peet
would be happy to share resources to provide you
much more information on transformative learning,
along with asking embodied questions. For now,
hopefully the ideas I have provided with you explain
enough for you to understand what went on in this
session.
This is where it gets more interesting.
I decided to give this a try in the classroom for a
group project that needs to be posted to student
eportfolios. For years, I have been asking questions,
such as:
1. What did you get out of group work?
2. Share what you learned?
3. What would you do differently?
These questions are not bad per say, but I do not
feel students are very involved when providing
answers.
This past semester, after the conference,
I decided to ask what I thought were embodied
questions of a group project instead, such as:
1. What made you angry?
2. What shocked you?
3. What made you feel good?
It worked! My students gave open and honest
answers. They seemed truly engaged and motivated
with reflection. Several students were able to be
honest with each other about team conflicts, major
successes, what they would do differently, and
what skill areas needed work. It’s hard to explain the
difference. I am sure anyone reading this article
knows the feeling of when your students are
motivated, engaged, and paying attention.
I plan to continue asking embodied questions
from this point forward. I also plan to have students
sit in reflection groups soon with other students
they do not normally team up with to see how
sharing their embodied answers works out. These
may seem like very simple ideas in the scheme of
things, but in the end, if it works better, why not
try it!
Let’s continue this discussion at the AAEEBL site
blog.
6. 5
Fall 2014
Snapshots from the AAEEBL 2015 Executive Summit
Each year’s Executive Summit brings corporate
representatives together with academics who
benefit from each other’s perspectives.
AAEEBL is committed to proving more-than-lectern
presentations at conferences, and the Executive
Summit is always exemplary of how we aim to
practice what we preach.
Attendees share creative ideas and make
new connections while learning in authentic
and experiential style!
Colin Dalziel of PebblePad and Gail Ring (Clemson University) doing
group work at the Executive Summit 2014.
Thanks to PebblePad for sponsoring the 2014 Executive
Summit. Here AAEEBL Co-Leaders, Judy and Trent Batson
(left and right) enjoy a photo op with Shane Sutherland, Colin
Dalziel and Holly Lewis.
Table work at the 2014 AAEEBL Annual Executive
Summit was animated and fun!
AAEEBL Executive Summits offer a great opportunity for Corporate
Partners to meet and greet each other and to share ideas. Here Mahara
(Kristina Hoeppner) meets Foliotek (Geoff Leigh).
Jeff Yan (Digication) and Cindy Stevens (Wentworth
Institute of Technology) converse about tacit
knowledge and eportfolios.
An additional value to Institutional Members
and Corporate Partners is access an
invitation to attend the Executive Summit,
held at AAEEBL’s Annual Conference.
7. 6
Fall 2014
This past July, at AAEEBL’s fifth international conference, I had the opportunity to
sit in a room of friends and colleagues and learn from one of the discipline’s shining stars, Dr. Melissa
Peet, at the Executive Summit hosted graciously by PebblePad. I’ve known Melissa since I joined the
professional eportfolio world as a dynamic speaker and a vibrant personality, and that life-inspired
work fills out the corners of her academic interest as well. She took a room full of people who knew
each other just a little bit and asked us to embody what we know, to think through the surface
reflection and to look deeper, and it left a lasting impression on me.
In a room of fifty semi-strangers, it can be hard to know who
you are. Each of us carries tags of meaning: the professors,
the eportfolio leaders, the creative, the traditional…so many
shapes. One of the strengths of Melissa’s approach to “generative
knowledge” is its ability to ground reflective thinking in experiential,
(em)bodied knowledge. She asked us to work as individuals and to
share as a collective ways in which we have had meaningful, engaged
experiences. What were the contexts for those experiences? Why
were they meaningful? How do they engage us?
By looking not only forward and back, but also sideways and
through the cracks, we can begin to unpack a lifetime of experiences
that make us meaningful contributors to our own life paths. That
became very apparent to me as I both thought through my own
moments of purposeful engagement and got to share with a relatively
new acquaintance some of hers. Through just a few pointed questions and a well-thought-through
listening strategy provided by Melissa’s guidance, we had a chance to
share and to learn from each other, finding both points of connection and
points of difference that offered a reminder and clearer definition on my
purpose, as an academic and as a working mind.
This comes at a particularly important time in the development of
eportfolios in higher education. The field is clearly maturing: the entire
conference was a mix of the new, oft-overwhelmed looking individuals
seeking to find a grounding and a beginning in this rather large field of
inquiry and of the old, oft-ground-down looking individuals seeking to
keep the movement going forward, looking for the rejuvenation of the
new. The conversations, both at the Executive Summit and at the rest
of the conference were, for me, on a much higher level than I had ever
experienced previously: it wasn’t only about cool new tech features
or undefined “reflection,” but about meaningful adoption of student
engagement, about multimodality of learning and expression, about helping
our students (and ourselves) self-direct and self-acknowledge learning and
experience. That is very powerful stuff, and Melissa’s guidance through
the Executive Summit was a wonderful capstone on that experience at the
conference. In that room are the visionaries who will take us to the next
experiences as a field; in that room are the individual experiences whose
stories we will embody as we move forward as a discipline. It’s comforting to have a strong, bright
voice at the front of the crowd asking good questions and showing a good path to walk.
AAEEBL’s 2014 Executive Summit: Embodying the Path
Marc Zaldivar
Director of Active Technologies for Engaged Learning
Virginia Tech
Marc Zaldivar (left) at“Generative
Coaching: Fostering Transformative
Learning in People and Organizations,”the
2014 Annual Executive Summit, sponsored
by PebblePad with facilitator Melissa Peet.
Executive Summit facilitator, Melissa
Peet (University of Michigan)
presenting about Generative Coaching.
She also provided opportunities
for attendees to gain an experience
in generative interviewing and
discovering the value of tacit
knowledge.
8. 7
Fall 2014
This piece is a reflection on assessment of the eportfolio
initiative on one campus: mine.
This fall I begin my third year as the Career Portfolio Specialist;
my anniversary coincides with the anniversary of the college’s
eportfolio initiative which began with my hiring. A primary
question that I’ve had to answer in designing and promoting the
concept of using portfolios with student learners has been, “What
are the benefits of using an eportfolio?” Now that I’m working
with fourteen classes, scholarship programs and groups, and have a waiting list of faculty who are
interested, I need to begin answering that question with evidence, rather than predictions.
What are the benefits of using an eportfolio? I write this question because its answers are both
elusive and self-evident. The benefits we look for and try to measure depend on our orientation and
goals. On my campus, each of my faculty partners has her own orientation and goals.
For example, my position is based in the Career Development Center. Our interests include the
college’s goals for increased student retention and persistence through graduation which may be
measurable over time through retention and graduation statistics once our participant numbers are
larger if the research department is able to assist us with some data assessment – phew! We are also
interested in intentional career decision making, post-graduation transfer and job attainment, and
employability skills.
Before we had an online component, one program I worked with started with a paper version that
emphasized student reflection. The students in the program all receive scholarship money. For each
of our three completed semesters, they rated the value of the reflection component higher than they
rated the scholarship money on a Likert scale. This data is useful and affirming, but does it answer the
question?
When I discuss the use of eportfolios with a faculty partner, I now ask specifically, “What are your
goals for using this tool? How will we measure the impact that the eportfolio has (on your students?
On your course? On your teaching?)?” So far, only one person has had a concrete idea for measuring
the benefits. She suggested a pre-test/post-test analysis of students goals (one of the standard
sections for our campus because the initiative is housed in the Career Development Center) using
surveys to see whether there are differences between the students in the eportfolio classes and a
control group of students not exposed to the eportfolios. Phew! Phew!
Yes, research is needed – but is this the best approach? Might a qualitative study be more
effective at understanding the benefits to students on our campus? Would those results be useful?
Would that method be respected?
Of course, we all have those students who totally embraced the concept and have stories to
support how the eportfolio benefitted them in the transfer or job search process, the students who
won a scholarship or who were highlighted in our campus ePortfolio Awards – but are these anecdotes
sufficient evidence to answer the question?
Some faculty suggested that we to move forward and let the market show that there is a benefit.
It has been suggested, “Ask employers to come tell us how valuable they are!”
So far, the pressure to answer the question, “What are the benefits of using an eportfolio?” is self-
imposed, but I want to be ready when it is posed by others.
Could you answer the question, “What campus is this article about?” with the response, “Mine.” If
so, consider joining the conversation about how to measure the benefits of using eportfolios on your
campus on the AAEEBL online forum.
Think About It
Julie Ambrose
Career Portfolio Specialist
Lehigh Carbon Community College
9. 8
Fall 2014
G. Alex Ambrose, Notre Dame’s associate
director of eportfolio assessment has leveraged
the pairing of eportfolios with digital badges for his
institution. Here, he shares some of the opportunities
and challenges for institutions looking to develop this
space.
Q: What’s unique about the pairing of digital badges
and eportfolios?
A: Both eportfolios and digital badges have been
around for a while, and each technology has garnered
a lot of attention. But I see a nice overlap, or
intersection.
The thing that I was getting stuck on, at first, with
digital badges, was the problem of where to put them
within the institutional framework. I was very excited
about the idea of digital badges but I was running into
a practical obstacle: People earn digital badges, but
where do they “put” them? Obviously, people have
their own portfolios, and to me, that’s the best place
for the digital badge.
But going back even one step before that, as
someone who is designing a digital badge system
for my campus, I have to ask for evidence of skills
and accomplishments based on a set of criteria. The
best medium and means I know of that can offer that
evidence is an eportfolio. The student is in effect
saying, “Here is my badge, and here in my eportfolio
you can see what I did to earn that badge.”
So, the “set” of eportfolios and badges together
is optimal: The eportfolio platform is not only best
optimized to take stock and provide evidence for
earning digital badges, it is the most logical space to
support or showcase them.
Q: Who will create generalized expectations and
familiar models around the pairing of digital badges
and eportfolios?
A: Although I’m very encouraged about formal
efforts to create standards, I still think you
have to put the control back with the individual
student. They may wish to showcase particular
badges with particular types of portfolios. For
example, a student might not want to mix their
gaming badges with their career learning badges,
or their political badges. For badges, we want
individuals to have the same type of flexibility,
control, and access that we’ve developed in
portfolios.
Q: We have an existing learning ecosystem, an
education establishment that we’ve all been
dealing with for decades. I know that’s changing,
but how can this pairing of digital badges and
eportfolios become operational across most
institutions?
A We’ve all watched disruptive trends in the last
10-15 years. Banking has changed, newspapers
have changed… I cannot believe education still
has not completely, fundamentally, and radically
changed. To me, it’s just a matter of time.
Whereas we spent the last decade chasing tools
and technologies, we can now see the trajectory
of and get an appreciation for disruptive
transformation.
I think of digital badges and eportfolios as
being among the emerging technologies for
traditional institutions to get ahead of. We need
to consider how we can flank and hedge these
disruptive innovations.
I see an important opportunity to do just
that, with the co-curricular. There are many things
students do in the co-curricular, like multiple
Continued on Page 9
The Intersection of Digital Badges and ePortfolios
A Q&A interview with G. Alex Ambrose
The eportfolio platform is not only best optimized to take stock and provide evidence for earning digital
badges, it is the most logical space to support or showcase them. - G. Alex Ambrose
10. 9
Fall 2014
internships, possibly multiple student jobs across
four years, developing clubs or leadership
programs, doing research deeply for 2-3 years with
a professor… These things are not really given
much justice on traditional transcripts,
or even on a resume.
So, if institutions like ours can use the digital
badge to make visible, and recognize the co-
curricular, I think that’s going to create a new
currency that starts changing the balance.
Q: It sounds like this pairing of digital badges and
eportfolios could encourage a lot of really creative
work in the co-curricular: Students will not have to
be afraid of losing this part of their story.
A: Yes! And the eportfolio has of course been,
through recent years, an effective tool to “tell your
story” on its own. But at this point, we just don’t
have robust design and integration of portfolios
into programs or plans of study. I work very hard
at my institution to set gateway and capstone
bookends, but it’s tough keeping the momentum
going, especially during the time in between. That’s
why I look to the co-curricular as an incentive to
what I call keeping the eportfolio pulse alive. We
don’t want students to build an eportfolio only
once in that gateway course and not touch it for
three or four years only to back up and scramble at
the point of the capstone. We want to stay up-to-
date, keep touch points going, and keep that EKG
engagement pulse alive for portfolios and digital
badges. Engagement with the co-curricular allows
us to do that.
Q: Are there champions of digital badges and
eportfolios on your campus? Or any limits affecting
your efforts?
A: The leadership here on campus has been
very helpful, offering both encouragement and
perspective for initiatives in that intersection of
digital badges and eportfolios. From my discussions
with several key leaders, I’ve learned some good
parameters to work within.
I do stay away from the curricular, from the
dollar, from the credit, from the hour, and from
the grade. That’s because if you try to create a
certificate, or certification, or create a certificate
program, you’ll find that those are all loaded
terms having deep, deep ramifications—with
accreditation, with the Department of Education,
with financial aid… and I don’t want to step into
those areas.
Q: At least for now, right? Or forever?
A: For now, I would say. I often call myself a
disruptive innovator. And I really would love to see
the day when we knock out the transcripts and the
high-stakes tests… and the accreditation agencies
and bureaucracies…
Q: How will new opportunities presented by the
pairing of digital badges with eportfolios fit into the
existing institutional framework for most colleges
and universities? Are there communities of practice
or oversight emerging now to be aware of?
A: I’m fairly wary after being an elementary
school teacher, and seeing No Child Left Behind…
Although standards and compatibility are important,
sometimes things go too far in terms of the
apparent need that arises for top-down control
and regulation. I get nervous about this. That’s
another reason why I say that I stay away from the
curricular. I don’t think the potential opportunities
eportfolios and badges may present together will
really need an organized ‘table-of-contents list of
badges’, nationally or globally.
Like eportfolios have been for years, the more
recent pairing of badges and eporfolios is really just
a platform. It’s not an entity in itself and nobody
owns it. It should be used by the individual, Number
One, and then the local program level, Number Two.
And these parties should communicate and define in
their own way how this platform is being used.
Keep in mind that the higher you go up, often
the more bureaucracy, the more regulation, the
more complicated things get… and everything slows
down.
In a true sense, all we are really doing as an
institution is giving stickers on eportfolios. And
students are just trying to earn some of these to
help create and tell their own story… to make sense
of their learning.
Continued from Page 8
We’re gearing up! Get Ready!
11. 10
Fall 2014
Wentworth Co-Op Students Take Over The AAEEBL Learner Production
Megan Savage is a senior at Wentworth Institute of Technology studying
Business Management with a concentration in Technology Project Management.
She took the position of producing The AAEEBL Learner as her last Co-Op at
Wentworth. Co-Op is a semester long internship that provides all Wentworth
students the opportunity to get hands on experience within their field of
study before they graduate. All students have to complete two Co-Op work
semesters to graduate from Wentworth. Megan is originally from West
Warwick, RI but now enjoys living in Boston, MA. She is a big New England
sports fan and works part-time at Fenway Park. When she’s not working or
studying, she enjoys cooking and exploring the city.
AAEEBL Partner, Deakin University Australia Leading International Event for Curate,
Credential and Carry Forward Digital Learning Evidence
Kate Coleman
Board of Directors
Deakin University and AAEEBL
Mozilla’s Open Badges project has opened up a new way of recognizing skills and learning
through an open, stackable framework and provided an opportunity to recognize more detailed
aspects of learning. For example, whereas achievement of learning may be somewhat invisible
in collated marks and grades, open badges enable the warranting of capabilities including those
that are difficult to measure (such as team work and intercultural competence). Badging skills,
experiences and knowledge can supplement or even replace traditional assessment signals such as
marks and grades. Open badges can also enable a more social approach to assessment: badges can
be issued or endorsed by designated stakeholders - peers, mentors, industry, associations – both
within and outside of an institution and build the learner’s ability to judge their own and others’
performance.
This national forum will showcase examples from the thought leaders in the field in prior learning,
credentialing, open badges practice and research, and offer an employer’s perspective.
International Thought Leaders
• Associate Professor Dan Hickey, Indiana University; Director of the Open Badges Design
Principles Documentation Project
• Dr. Nan Travers, SUNY, Director of the Office of Collegewide Academic Review National
Thought Leaders
• Associate Professor David Gibson, Curtin University
• Allyn Radford, CEO, DeakinDigital InPractice
• Dr. Michael Evans, Neukom Fellow, Dartmouth College
• Joanna Normoyle, Experiential and Digital Media Learning Coordinator; UC
Davis Professional perspectives
• Janet Strivens, Centre for Lifelong Learning Educational Development Division The
University of Liverpool, Senior Associate Director, The CRA
• Susie Steigler-Peters, Education Industry Executive, Telstra
More Information
12. 11
Fall 2014
We are moving forward with AAEEBL’s badging and digital credentialing initiative given a global
movement with greater recognition of badges for Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) and credentialing. We
are stepping up on this regardless of our lag in the 2013 launch since we believe that PLA and alternative
credentialing are vital components of 21st century learning, and we endeavor to offer significant and
innovative ways for AAEEBL Community members to earn designation of engagement through badging.
But, What is a Badge?
1. A device or emblem worn as an insignia of rank, office, or membership in an organization.
2. An emblem given as an award or honor. Freedictionary.com
JISC tells us that “in its most basic form, an Open Badge is a digital reward which can be stored
inside a student’s ‘digital backpack’. The badges can be achieved by completing tasks and goals set by an
issuer, such as a learning provider (awarding badges for achieving soft skills) or a website (for completing
an online task), basically anyone who wants to keep a user motivated and interested. The issuer creates
the criteria needed for the user to achieve the badge. This is embedded inside the badge in the form of
metadata, along with who issued the badge, when it was issued and an expiry date if relevant” (http://
www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/so-what-are-open-badges-28-aug-2013).
Digital badges are artifacts that signify credit upon endorsement for a skill, capability or
competency. They represent to the earner that they have achieved a significant milestone and
demonstrate accomplishment to enrich and motivate, incentivize and acknowledge both informal and
formal learning experiences. They have an international standards body (Mozilla Foundation) and many
supporting platforms for award and display. Badges provide evidence of learning in a variety of situations
and can be issued by any evaluator of the badge assigning a value to it such as museums, schools
and organisations such as AAEEBL. In 2011 the Mozilla Foundation developed the Mozilla Open Badge
infrastructure, this created a common system for the issuance, collection, and display of digital badges.
In the art world they are becoming valuable digital currency in museums and art galleries, particularly in
North America where the American Alliance of Museums, including the Museum of Modern Art New York,
The Smithsonian and the Dallas Museum of Art issue trusted and valuable art credits to learners. Digital
Badges can assist our students as they develop lifelong learning skills and development of self through
portfolios to:
• Credential demonstration of evidence, process and product
• Display competencies, skills and capabilities
• Develop identity and explore notion of self through badge earning as they make skills explicit
to the community
• Capture and demonstrate the various learning process pathways
• Encourage and motivate learners through formative feedback
• Support innovation, trial and experimentation as they can be designed to capture a variety of
skills
Flashback to 2013
Regarding the 2013 launch, one person noted that she thought the badging was “sorta silly,” but
then she was “disappointed to not get badges” since she actually earned them.
Earn AAEEBL-Credentialed Badges and Contribute to the AAEEBL Community
Online (ACO)
Kate Coleman
Board of Directors
Deakin University and AAEEBL
Continued on Page 14
13. 12
Fall 2014
One sticking point last year was how we lacked a way to upload more than five people at a time to
Credly, our partner in badging. Sadly, nobody on the 2013 Badge-Issuing Team, all volunteer leaders,
could dedicate the time it took to issue badges to five earners at a time, and we hope you understand.
Credly now can accept larger lists, and we are able to revisit unissued 2013 badges and move forward
with a whole new 2014 initiative.
If you earned a badge in a particular category or at a specific level in the 2013 issuing of badges,
we can redress and issue your badges now. They don’t go out of style like the Princess Phone but gain
stature as we all move into 21st century learning together.
Here’s what you need to do now:
1. Log into Credly, and set up your account (https://credly.com/). Some badges for 2013 and for
2014 are automatic and will be issued to you.
2. Other AAEEBL-issued badges, require you to nominate yourself, or another person, and submit
evidence to support achievement of criteria established behind-the-badge to warrant the credit.
In some cases, testimonials from colleagues are necessary to earn badges.
3. In some cases, as a participant in the initiative, you are able to issue the badge to others based
on the evidence they submitted.
Beyond Superficiality: More than just a “pretty face”
It is important to note that badges are not superficial displays of singular activities, but build upon
each other and are representative of increased levels of engagement in the AAEEBL Community and
enable display of initial and higher levels of competency and accomplishment in a variety of areas.
Yes, AAEEBL-issued badges are super-handsome, and those who earn them are entitled to display
them in social media, on websites, and in signature files among other places, but they signify an issuing
from a recognized source for credentialing that supports your learning, accomplishments and contributions
to the field.
Behind the Badges: Evidence and Testimonials Matter!
It’s what’s behind the badge that counts! The AAEEBL badging initiative entitles earners to display
AAEEBL-issued credentials at each badge level recognizing deeper learning achievement with evidence
about engagement from an initial level that recognizes individual accomplishment to increased shared
learning and greater dissemination about authentic, experiential and evidence-based learning with
eportfolios. The evidence is embedded inside the badge in the form of metadata, along with the details
of the issuer, in this instance AAEEBL, when it was issued and an expiry date if relevant. As mentioned
previously, in some cases, the earning of badges is incumbent upon demonstration of evidence to support
learning and, in some cases, testimonials from colleagues.
We expect all of our badges and criteria to be posted to Credly soon, and
AAEEBL will start issuing badges in as timely a manner as possible given the limits
of volunteer leaders.
High Achiever? No worries! Become an ePortfolio Champion! ------->
Want to Gain Experience in Badging and Alternative Credentialing?
If you are interested in badges and alternative credentialing, and if you are
already part of an AAEEBL Member Institution, we invite your assistance and
participation as a leader in this initiative. For more information, contact judy@aaeebl.org.
Note: Since this is a relatively new initiative, we are all learning as we move forward, so it is important
for volunteer leaders to be willing to jump on the learning curve and be ready to learn more about and to
contribute to this important alternative credentialing initiative.
Continued from Page 13
14. 13
Fall 2014
A Message from Your AAEEBL Co-Leaders
Trent Batson and Judy Williamson Batson
A Focus on Publications and Resource Development for the AAEEBL
Community Online
As a member of the AAEEBL community, you
are probably familiar with the migration we made to
our new member-
management
website, the
AAEEBL Community
Online (ACO)
where we are able
to handle many
aspects of running
a 501(c)3 non-
profit professional
association. You
may also be aware
of the hiatus in
publication of The
AAEEBL Learner (TAL) publication and in our rather
rocky launch during the initial rollout. Almost nothing
went as planned or expected, and we experienced
a deep empathy for other online launches with
prominent road bumps, or as with our launch, more
like a major interstate highway rebuild.
To say it’s taken two years to manage our
learning curve on the new platform sounds
hyperbolic, and the process has not been a rosy one
replete with fresh insights and the serendipitous
making of connections. This message, however, is
not about all the pain but about rounding a significant
corner and now feeling more confident, and even a
bit celebratory. We’re hitting operational stride once
again in spite of the notoriously funky backend of the
user interface. We’d like to share several significant
strides forward that you’ll notice:
1. TAL is back in the publication loop.
2. We’re getting resources organized in a
more robust and accessible way.
3. We’re launching a guest blogger feature
you’ll enjoy.
What is TAL, and how does it serve those
interested in authentic, experiential and evidence-
based learning, particularly in relation to eportfolios?
TAL has provided insights, thoughts and
experiences from colleagues around the world. Many
Trent Batson, Ph.D., President &
Judy Williamson Batson, APR, CEO
contributors offered years of eportfolio experience to
TAL readers and convey what they’ve learned from
eportfolio work. We thank The Wentworth Institute of
Technology (WIT) for making it possible to once again
issue regular releases of TAL. We also thank Virginia
Tech for their work since 2009 to launch and serve
AAEEBL by handling TAL publication.
TAL is now a quarterly publication, but it was
issued six times a year until recently. It has always
served as AAEEBL’s newsletter, and it will continue to
offer the latest in news about events shared with us
from around the world. TAL has always occupied an
“informal-scholarly” space and likely will remain that
way in contrast to IJeP where more formal scholarship
and empirical research can be found, usually published
by those who are experienced leaders in the field.
In contrast, TAL is evolving into an accessible spot
where those new to the field may take first steps
writing about experiences, best-practices, ah-ha
moments, and also sharing questions, reflections,
resources, connection-making and exemplary
eportfolios. In our new, quarterly format, we’ll offer
a pathway to publication aligned with our focus on
authentic, experiential and evidence-based learning
that is your own. We recognize that newcomers
to the field have something to contribute to the
larger conversation, including students, at both the
graduate and undergraduate levels.
We invite submissions by writers who wish to
craft and publish based on the authentic evidence
and reflective assessment of their own learning
experiences. TAL seeks to recognize and give
voice to the many learners at all levels that bring
contributions to the conversation.
TAL is a microcosm in a much larger network
of eportfolio publications and communications.
We’ve already mentioned the double-blind, peer-
reviewed, scholarly publication, The International
Journal of ePortfolio (IJeP). We also benefit from
the presence of a two scholarly publications issued
by the Centre for Recording Achievement – PDP UK,
and On Reflection. Other pathways to information
about eportfolios include EPAC’s familiar listserv as
Continued on Page 16
15. 14
Fall 2014
well as publications from the Inter/National Center
for ePortfolio Research, the epic-news from ePIC,
and archived blogs from ePortfolios Australia to
mention a few other English language sources. (If
you’re reading this and know of others, whether
in English or not, please let us know about related
communication conduits so we can include them on
our publications page resource.)
We’ve recently taken a step to make past issues
of TAL more accessible by launching an archive and
index with notes about what can be found in each
issue. We hope our nascent index makes it easier
for those who want to see what TAL featured in
the past and also hope the compilation supports
the evolving knowledge about eportfolios. Our
contributors, some taking first steps of engagement
with eportfolios, generously contributed to TAL
based on their own reflections and experiential
learning.
The eportfolio movement, a movement that
propels us from a focus on teaching to an expanded
view about learning, from assuming one-size-fits-
all to an awareness about variable learning paths,
and from one-dimensional assessment to three-
dimensional. More than a “flipped classroom,”
we might call it “flipping the institution,” and
we’re seeing how these new perspectives are
crucial to the ongoing metamorphosis of higher
education globally. TAL collects the “how to” of
this movement as well as the “how not to” of the
movement. It serves to represent questions and
lessons-learned (e.g. “mistakes,” the kind we tell our
students are so valuable to the “learning process”).
It is now an archived and indexed publication that
has benefitted from the support of Virginia Tech in
its first iteration and, now, from Wentworth Institute
of Technology for our progressing iteration.
One size does not fit all. In our field, many
voices are part of the conversation, and it’s
important for us to serve by offering TAL where
multiple voices can be included and appreciated.
Don’t wait until you think you have all the questions
answered before contributing to The AAEEBL
Learner. Developing questions, after all, is one of
the most salient aspects to the overall experience of
learning!
Show your interest in writing for TAL by sending
queries to Judy Batson. The submission deadline for
the winter 2015 issue is December 10.
Continued from Page 15
Register to join the ACO.
Learn more about AAEEBL.
Find “Latest News” in the right panel
of our homepage.
Publish an article in The AAEEBL Learner
(TAL) - Winter 2015
Plan to attend AAEEBL events. View the
calendar in the left column of our homepage.
Add resources at the Digital Storytelling Wiki
New! View the TAL Archive and Index of
past issues.
New! Read guest blog posts by Kevin Kelly and
Laura Kohl and watch for more to come.
New! Discuss Embodied Learning with Cindy
Stevens in her TAL Forum
(Featured on page 4).
New! Join Julie’s “Think About It” forum.
(Featured on page 7).
Learn about ways to belong to AAEEBL
(some free) on the Contact AAEEBL page.
Coming Soon! AAEEBL Call for
Proposals will be added soon and
you will find a landing page for
AAEEBL 2015!
Quick Links for the AAEEBL
Online Community
16. 15
Fall 2014
New Resources Featured on the AAEEBL Online Community
Moving Conversations from TAL to
the ACO
Find a new interactive approach to TAL
in both Cindy Stevens’ and Julie Ambrose’s
columns in this issue. Both invite readers to join
them online for continued discussion.
Stevens draws upon ideas Melissa Peet
presented at AAEEL 2014’s Executive Summit
and asks “embodied questions,” the sort of
questions she plans to focus on in future
columns. She plans to facilitate deeper student
reflection using embodied questions and will
share what she learns with us in a forum at
the ACO. (Note: A video of Peet’s Executive
Summit Session, “Generative Coaching:
Fostering Transformative Learning in People and
Organizations,” is being readied for viewing at
the ACO.)
Julie, a new addition to TAL, will present
“Think About It,” a column that also invites
readers to engage in discussion at the AAEEBL
Online Community.
In both cases inquiry, curiosity and
authentic learning experiences will drive
conversation, and newcomers to the field, as
well as experienced implementers, will find a
welcoming space that embraces experiential
learning. In other words, we are taking more
steps to “model” what we value and to invite
reflections, questions and discussion such as we
appreciate at AAEEBL face-to-face conference
gatherings.
Introducing Guest Blogging at the ACO
The AAEEBL Community Online (ACO)
will launch a guest blogging initiative
featuring leaders who will address a variety
of topics related to eportfolios and authentic,
experiential and evidence-based learning.
We’re pleased to feature Kevin Kelly, first
up for this initiative. Guest bloggers will
spend two or three weeks with us at the
ACO and will
share topics that
will be followed
by comments,
questions and
participation.
Kevin Kelly is
an entrepreneur
and educational
leader with more
than 15 years’
experience in online
learning; professional development; knowledge
management; institutional advancement;
technology adoption and implementation
(e.g., ePortfolios, LMS, lecture capture,
clickers, student evaluations of teaching
effectiveness); assessment and evaluation.
He recently completed 3 years directing an ed
tech startup for a large publishing company.
Currently, Kevin provides consulting services
in both corporate and educational settings,
and teaches a fully online, undergraduate Gen
Ed course at San Francisco State University,
called How 2 Lrn w ur iPod.
17. 16
Fall 2014
Calendar of Events 2014-2015
12/15/2014 Submission Deadline for AAEEBL Learner
Save the Dates for AAEEBL 2015
Hynes Convention Center in Boston, MA
More Information
Researching and Evaluating Recording Achievement,
Personal Development, Planning, and ePortfolio
Plymouth, UK
More Information
AAC&U 2015 ePortfolio Forum
Grand Hyatt Hotel in Washington, DC
More Information
7/27/2015 through 7/30/2015
4/16/2015 through 4/17/2015
1/24/2015
Do you have an upcoming event of interest to those involved in authentic, experiential
and evidence-based learning? If so, please email judy@aaeebl.org with the information
for the event, and we’ll include it in our Calendar.
The Seminar Planning Group invites practitioners and
researchers to a seminar on the
theme of “Researching and Evaluating Recording
Achievement, Personal Development Planning
and eportfolio.” Proposals are invited from
both established and emergent researchers
and practitioners on topics such as: various
methodologies; case studies of individuals and small
groups; and large cross-institutional studies linked to
retention and graduation data.
Learn more by visiting the seminar landing page.
Researching and Evaluating Recording
Achievement, Personal Development
Planning and ePortfolio
Plymouth, UK, April 16-17, 2015
2/19/2015
Proposals due for AAEEBL 2015
Find more information and submit proposals by going to
the AAEEBL Community Online
New Feature on the ACO:
Visit our Community Blog
to view posts by
guest bloggers.
Share your comments
and questions with our
bloggers.
Watch for guest bloggers Nancy Wozniak and
Kate Coleman coming up next!
Thanks to Kevin Kelly and Laura Kohl for kicking
off our guest blogging initiative!