eStrategiesEurope00 www.britishpublishers.com 00
As new technology will emerge to enhance processes,
new expectations will come which will raise the bar in
a competitive environment
processoptimisation
processoptimisation
eS
S
ince early 1990, Business Process
Reengineering (BPR), Shared
Services Centres (SSC) and more
recently Business Process Outsourcing
(BPO) have been the preferred options
for companies looking for service to cost
optimisation for major corporations.
Three ways to transformation
So what are these three methods
employed to instigate change?
BPR has been and remains a
popular approach used to improve
business processes efficiency. It is
progressive and must be permanent,
does not require major investments
and can be used at different stages of
a transformation programme either as
a stand alone project or combined with
another initiative.
SSC imply to consolidate functions
across businesses and to move
to professional services and to a
contractual relationship with internal
customers. This approach represents
a major breakthrough that will be
implemented in two to three years
depending on the scale and complexity
of operations, the quality of project
governance and the capability to
manage transformation.
BPO have been used as an additional
way to generate savings and/or to
integrate external expertise. If the
strategy retained is outsourcing, a
significant effort will be required to
prepare the request for proposals, select
the BPO provider, negotiate the BPO
contract and to transfer knowledge and
activities to the provider.
Although, a lot of work has been
done to improve support processes,
it is generally recognised that there
is still room for further improvement
and it is disconcerting to realise that
the majority of senior executives say
that their initiatives did not deliver the
expected benefits. The average reward
achieved through SSC is in fact a 20 per
cent cost saving, with a difference of 23
per cent between expected and achieved
benefits, with relevance mainly for
European organisations.
Initiate the transformation
programme through a Business Case
Such a transformation programme
must start within a framework that
confirms the vision, goals, the return
on investments and the timeline and
obtains support from management
executives. Planning the entire process
competently with clear expectations
from start to end is a key requirement to
achieve the desired results.
Assessment includes: data collection
on loaded salary costs, direct and
indirect costs such as IS and Facilities,
headcounts and full time equivalent
and volumes per output. Also needed
in the assessment is a consideration
of influencing factors such as:
current environment reviews on an
organisation, people competencies,
processes, relevant technologies, as
well as change readiness. The validated
Business Case integrates the scope and
delivery model, the transition planning,
and will be included in a Project Charter
for project monitoring.
Build the right network of Shared
Service Centres
SSC implementation will be driven by
the choice of the appropriate delivery
model between local and regional
functions and the localisation of
the SSC platforms balancing labour
arbitrage and transition costs (including
project governance and social impact).
If easy access to the SSC is required or
the expertise to manage remotely is low,
it is more appropriate to avoid offshore
sites and select an onshore location.
Corporations are progressively moving
from national to regional or global
offshore SSC serving multiple countries:
in Europe 40 per cent are maturing
offshoring, only seven per cent have
done it (ref: Hackett 2006).
Communication is often
underestimated or poorly executed.
Implementation of SSC is a radical
change as several employees will leave
the company and those remaining
will have to get used to best in class
processes interacting with remote
locations. In order to succeed in that
transformation, we recommend building
multi functional teams including HR
and experts in change management.
When well executed, SSC
implementation can deliver payback
in a time scale ranging between one to
three years depending on the size of
the project and on the initial processes
efficiency. At this point, SSC needs
first to stabilise service delivery for
each customer for all processes and
then to consider ways to enhance its
performance either through BPR and/
or BPO.
Stabilise and improve end to end
processes internally
The duration of the stabilisation period
depends on the processes diversity
before transfer and on SSC‘s ownership
on corporate transformation. SSC will
simplify and standardise processes
using a management approach like
Six Sigma or TQM and investing in
productivity tools (Scanning with OCR,
EDI, Workflows, Expense management
tools, Reporting etc.) to reduce manual
work, hands-off and cycle time.
Think on this – what is not measured
does not improve.
You should define key performance
indicators and metrics and regularly
compare against targets and industry
benchmarks. Using simple but reliable
reporting tools will enable you to update
the service level and cost baseline of
the SSC and to monitor progress and
support investments requests.
At this point, general management
might also consider partial or complete
outsourcing of those processes. The
drivers for making a BPO decision
include SSC poor results, an opportunity
to sell SSC as an asset, investment
required to move forward, urgency to
generate additional savings, and/or
proven ability of the BPO provider to
reach a higher level of performance.
Extend the SSC functional scope
and customer portfolio
To leverage investments and to
capitalise on expertise it has developed,
it might be decided when the network
of SSC platforms are covering all
countries, to extend the scope of the
SSC: from a SSC dedicated to a function
to a Global Shared Services organisation
covering all support functions including
Finance, Human Resources, IT,
Facilities and Services, Procurement,
Sales Administration, Legal and Tax,
Communication. In that model Corporate
SVP like CFO or CIO will continue to
define strategies, fix objectives and
allocate means and SSC will deliver
contractual professional services against
best practices to both Corporation and
Business Units.
The SSC cycle could not be complete
without considering providing
services to external clients to
leverage management structure and
infrastructure investments and get
further synergies from additional
volumes. Based on our knowledge, few
companies outside the IT sector have
moved into this direction.
Get benefits from partnering with
outsourcing providers
The demand from large corporations
for service to cost optimisation will
continue to generate strong growth for
the next decade in each function. Deals
are more global on IT than they are on
Finance, Human Resources or Facilities
Management, probably due to local
regulations and local customer’s needs,
and to the resources involved in building
worldwide capacities with providers
focusing first on regional platforms.
Today some providers are addressing
several functions and multiple processes
for all sectors, some are specialised in
one industry addressing all support
functions (for example Healthcare), and
others are focused on a few processes
for multiple sectors (§such as back
office processes for Bank and Insurance
sectors). New players are either
building on functional or IT expertise
(from Software developer or from
Accountant to BPO provider) and/or
on their capacities (Labour advantage
or Funds to buy current assets from
corporations).
The consolidation of the market will
probably accelerate due to the fact
that providers will have to complete
their delivery model to face not only
global and regional needs but also local
requirements, and that investor will
push for industrial mergers or IPO.
The service to cost continuous
improvement process may challenge
current IT infrastructure (eg. Service
Oriented Architecture) as well as
Information Systems (eg. ERP functional
scope vs niche applicative solutions)
and beyond process efficiency refocus
the attention to data reliability (eg.
Customer, Supplier, Employee, Product
data administration).
We believe that providers will more
and more enhance end to end processes
like ‘Purchase to Pay', ‘Order to Cash',
‘Hire to Retire', ‘Record to Report' or
‘Install to Support' and move from
transaction based relations to value
added services with some profit sharing.
What could be the Best in Class
Transformation Model?
Based on the last 15 years worth of
experiences, it is fair to conclude that
process improvement will stay at a pace
specific to each organisation. Early
adopters although having reached a
high level of performance, are still
looking for further service to cost
optimisation. As new technology will
emerge to enhance processes, new
expectations will come which will raise
the bar in a competitive environment.
In addition, data harmonisation will
enable more and more transactions to
be processed accurately with limited
human interventions allowing to
invest in value added activities such
as decision support or corporate
performance monitoring.
To reach the next level of
performance, corporations will have
to combine BPR, SSC and BPO using
Shared Service as the core concept
to leverage BPR and BPO in order to
customerise service delivery models
combining regional efficiencies for
volume related activities and local
competencies for value added activities.
BPO and IT providers will have to adapt
their models and solutions to comply
with new expectations combining
global efficiency and returns and local
intimacy for value added.
For those still at the beginning of
their improvement programme, the pace
might be faster as they can leverage the
experience of other companies.
Managing transformation effectively
Jean-Claude De Vera, Biporis President, illustrates how to handle the general management
challenge of transforming Finance, Human Resources, IT, or Facilities from decision to
operational implementation for large companies
Before founding Biporis, Jean-
Claude De Vera had extensive
senior executive experience as
Auditor, Information Systems
and Finance Director, Business
Services and Profit Centres
Director.
He is President of Biporis,
that specialises in Process
Optimisation, Shared Services
and Outsourcing operations. He is
a member of the Shared Services
and Outsourcing Network (SSON/
IQPC) a and member of the IAOP.
BiPoris.indd 2-3 30/8/07 10:52:36

200708_E Strategy Managing Transformation effectively

  • 1.
    eStrategiesEurope00 www.britishpublishers.com 00 Asnew technology will emerge to enhance processes, new expectations will come which will raise the bar in a competitive environment processoptimisation processoptimisation eS S ince early 1990, Business Process Reengineering (BPR), Shared Services Centres (SSC) and more recently Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) have been the preferred options for companies looking for service to cost optimisation for major corporations. Three ways to transformation So what are these three methods employed to instigate change? BPR has been and remains a popular approach used to improve business processes efficiency. It is progressive and must be permanent, does not require major investments and can be used at different stages of a transformation programme either as a stand alone project or combined with another initiative. SSC imply to consolidate functions across businesses and to move to professional services and to a contractual relationship with internal customers. This approach represents a major breakthrough that will be implemented in two to three years depending on the scale and complexity of operations, the quality of project governance and the capability to manage transformation. BPO have been used as an additional way to generate savings and/or to integrate external expertise. If the strategy retained is outsourcing, a significant effort will be required to prepare the request for proposals, select the BPO provider, negotiate the BPO contract and to transfer knowledge and activities to the provider. Although, a lot of work has been done to improve support processes, it is generally recognised that there is still room for further improvement and it is disconcerting to realise that the majority of senior executives say that their initiatives did not deliver the expected benefits. The average reward achieved through SSC is in fact a 20 per cent cost saving, with a difference of 23 per cent between expected and achieved benefits, with relevance mainly for European organisations. Initiate the transformation programme through a Business Case Such a transformation programme must start within a framework that confirms the vision, goals, the return on investments and the timeline and obtains support from management executives. Planning the entire process competently with clear expectations from start to end is a key requirement to achieve the desired results. Assessment includes: data collection on loaded salary costs, direct and indirect costs such as IS and Facilities, headcounts and full time equivalent and volumes per output. Also needed in the assessment is a consideration of influencing factors such as: current environment reviews on an organisation, people competencies, processes, relevant technologies, as well as change readiness. The validated Business Case integrates the scope and delivery model, the transition planning, and will be included in a Project Charter for project monitoring. Build the right network of Shared Service Centres SSC implementation will be driven by the choice of the appropriate delivery model between local and regional functions and the localisation of the SSC platforms balancing labour arbitrage and transition costs (including project governance and social impact). If easy access to the SSC is required or the expertise to manage remotely is low, it is more appropriate to avoid offshore sites and select an onshore location. Corporations are progressively moving from national to regional or global offshore SSC serving multiple countries: in Europe 40 per cent are maturing offshoring, only seven per cent have done it (ref: Hackett 2006). Communication is often underestimated or poorly executed. Implementation of SSC is a radical change as several employees will leave the company and those remaining will have to get used to best in class processes interacting with remote locations. In order to succeed in that transformation, we recommend building multi functional teams including HR and experts in change management. When well executed, SSC implementation can deliver payback in a time scale ranging between one to three years depending on the size of the project and on the initial processes efficiency. At this point, SSC needs first to stabilise service delivery for each customer for all processes and then to consider ways to enhance its performance either through BPR and/ or BPO. Stabilise and improve end to end processes internally The duration of the stabilisation period depends on the processes diversity before transfer and on SSC‘s ownership on corporate transformation. SSC will simplify and standardise processes using a management approach like Six Sigma or TQM and investing in productivity tools (Scanning with OCR, EDI, Workflows, Expense management tools, Reporting etc.) to reduce manual work, hands-off and cycle time. Think on this – what is not measured does not improve. You should define key performance indicators and metrics and regularly compare against targets and industry benchmarks. Using simple but reliable reporting tools will enable you to update the service level and cost baseline of the SSC and to monitor progress and support investments requests. At this point, general management might also consider partial or complete outsourcing of those processes. The drivers for making a BPO decision include SSC poor results, an opportunity to sell SSC as an asset, investment required to move forward, urgency to generate additional savings, and/or proven ability of the BPO provider to reach a higher level of performance. Extend the SSC functional scope and customer portfolio To leverage investments and to capitalise on expertise it has developed, it might be decided when the network of SSC platforms are covering all countries, to extend the scope of the SSC: from a SSC dedicated to a function to a Global Shared Services organisation covering all support functions including Finance, Human Resources, IT, Facilities and Services, Procurement, Sales Administration, Legal and Tax, Communication. In that model Corporate SVP like CFO or CIO will continue to define strategies, fix objectives and allocate means and SSC will deliver contractual professional services against best practices to both Corporation and Business Units. The SSC cycle could not be complete without considering providing services to external clients to leverage management structure and infrastructure investments and get further synergies from additional volumes. Based on our knowledge, few companies outside the IT sector have moved into this direction. Get benefits from partnering with outsourcing providers The demand from large corporations for service to cost optimisation will continue to generate strong growth for the next decade in each function. Deals are more global on IT than they are on Finance, Human Resources or Facilities Management, probably due to local regulations and local customer’s needs, and to the resources involved in building worldwide capacities with providers focusing first on regional platforms. Today some providers are addressing several functions and multiple processes for all sectors, some are specialised in one industry addressing all support functions (for example Healthcare), and others are focused on a few processes for multiple sectors (§such as back office processes for Bank and Insurance sectors). New players are either building on functional or IT expertise (from Software developer or from Accountant to BPO provider) and/or on their capacities (Labour advantage or Funds to buy current assets from corporations). The consolidation of the market will probably accelerate due to the fact that providers will have to complete their delivery model to face not only global and regional needs but also local requirements, and that investor will push for industrial mergers or IPO. The service to cost continuous improvement process may challenge current IT infrastructure (eg. Service Oriented Architecture) as well as Information Systems (eg. ERP functional scope vs niche applicative solutions) and beyond process efficiency refocus the attention to data reliability (eg. Customer, Supplier, Employee, Product data administration). We believe that providers will more and more enhance end to end processes like ‘Purchase to Pay', ‘Order to Cash', ‘Hire to Retire', ‘Record to Report' or ‘Install to Support' and move from transaction based relations to value added services with some profit sharing. What could be the Best in Class Transformation Model? Based on the last 15 years worth of experiences, it is fair to conclude that process improvement will stay at a pace specific to each organisation. Early adopters although having reached a high level of performance, are still looking for further service to cost optimisation. As new technology will emerge to enhance processes, new expectations will come which will raise the bar in a competitive environment. In addition, data harmonisation will enable more and more transactions to be processed accurately with limited human interventions allowing to invest in value added activities such as decision support or corporate performance monitoring. To reach the next level of performance, corporations will have to combine BPR, SSC and BPO using Shared Service as the core concept to leverage BPR and BPO in order to customerise service delivery models combining regional efficiencies for volume related activities and local competencies for value added activities. BPO and IT providers will have to adapt their models and solutions to comply with new expectations combining global efficiency and returns and local intimacy for value added. For those still at the beginning of their improvement programme, the pace might be faster as they can leverage the experience of other companies. Managing transformation effectively Jean-Claude De Vera, Biporis President, illustrates how to handle the general management challenge of transforming Finance, Human Resources, IT, or Facilities from decision to operational implementation for large companies Before founding Biporis, Jean- Claude De Vera had extensive senior executive experience as Auditor, Information Systems and Finance Director, Business Services and Profit Centres Director. He is President of Biporis, that specialises in Process Optimisation, Shared Services and Outsourcing operations. He is a member of the Shared Services and Outsourcing Network (SSON/ IQPC) a and member of the IAOP. BiPoris.indd 2-3 30/8/07 10:52:36