1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363100&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=218312&… 1/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1-41)
41 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (42-48)
48 points
Proficient (B
Range) (49-53)
53 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (54-60)
60 points
Criterion
Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 60Student did not
submit
assignment
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with
all components
being addressed in
good depth and
breadth. Purpose
statement is
present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations
with exceptional
depth and breath.
A comprehensive
purpose
statement
delineates all
requirements of
the assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1-38)
38 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (39-43)
43 points
Proficient (B
Range) (44-49)
49 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(50-55)
55 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 55Student did not
submit
assignment
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1-34)
34 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (35-39)
39 points
Proficient (B
Range) (40-44)
44 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(45-50)
50 points
Criterion
Score
1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363100&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=218312&… 2/3
Total / 175
Overall Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
resources
to apply
concepts in
the
assignment.
/ 50Student did not
submit
assignment
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
concepts, and/or
strategies.
Summarizes
information
gleaned from
sources to support
major points, but
does not
synthesize.
Provides minimal
justification to
support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information
gleaned from
sources to support
major points
presented. Uses a
minimum of 2
credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes an ...
1262021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Hea
1. 1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics
in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=363
100&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId
=218312&… 1/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1-41)
41 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (42-48)
48 points
Proficient (B
Range) (49-53)
53 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (54-60)
60 points
Criterion
Score
2. Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 60Student did not
submit
assignment
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
4. appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations
with exceptional
depth and breath.
A comprehensive
purpose
statement
delineates all
requirements of
the assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1-38)
38 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (39-43)
5. 43 points
Proficient (B
Range) (44-49)
49 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(50-55)
55 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 55Student did not
submit
assignment
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
9. sources to support
major points, but
does not
synthesize.
Provides minimal
justification to
support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information
gleaned from
sources to support
major points
10. presented. Uses a
minimum of 2
credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms) information
gleaned from sources
to support major
points presented.
Uses 3 credible
resources for the
assignment, including
at least 1 scholarly
peer-reviewed
resource.
Criteria
11. No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D Range)
(1-6)
6 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
7 points
Proficient (B
Range)
8 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Criterion
Score
Uses correct
spelling, grammar,
and professional
vocabulary.
Provides credible
resources using
correct APA
12. format.
/ 10Student did not
submit
assignment
Contains many (≥
5) grammar,
spelling,
punctuation and
APA errors that
interfere with the
reader’s
understanding
Contains a few
(3–4) grammar,
spelling,
punctuation and
APA errors.
Uses correct
13. grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors.
Contains a few
(1–2) APA
format errors.
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors. Uses
correct APA
format with no
errors.
1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics
in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
33. 51
1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics
in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359
329&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29
&d2l_bod… 1/3
Criteria
Unacceptable
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range)
27 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
31 points
Above Average (B
Range)
35 points
Exemplary (A
Range)
40 points
Criterion
34. Score
Quality
of
Initial
Posting
/ 40No initial posting to
evaluate
The information
provided is
inaccurate, not
focused on the
assignment’s topic,
and/or does not
answer the
question(s) fully.
Response
demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of the
35. topic and/or
inadequate
preparation.
The information provided is
accurate, giving a basic
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. A basic
understanding is when you
are able to describe the
terms and concepts
covered. Despite this basic
understanding, initial
posting may not include
complete development of
all aspects of the
assignment.
The information provided is
accurate, displaying a good
36. understanding of the topic(s)
covered. A good
understanding is when you
are able to explain the terms
and topics covered. Initial
posting demonstrates sincere
reflection and addresses
most aspects of the
assignment, although all
concepts may not be fully
developed.
The information
provided is accurate,
providing an in-depth,
well thought-out
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. An in-
depth understanding
37. provides an analysis of
the information,
synthesizing what is
learned from the
course/assigned
readings.
Criteria
Unacceptable
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range)
13 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
15 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
17 points
Exemplary (A
Range)
20 points
Criterion
Score
38. Participation
in
Discussion
/ 20No responses to
other classmates in
this discussion forum
May include one or
more of the
following:
*Comments to only
one other student's
post.
*Comments are not
substantive, such as
Comments to two or
more classmates’ initial
posts but only on one
day of the week.
39. Comments are
substantive, meaning
they reflect and expand
Comments to two or
more classmates’ initial
posts on more than one
day. Comments are
substantive, meaning
they reflect and expand
on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two or
more classmates’ initial
posts and to the
instructor's comment (if
applicable) on two or
more days. Responses
demonstrate an analysis
40. of peers’ comments,
1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics
in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359
329&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29
&d2l_bod… 2/3
Total / 80
Overall Score
Writing
Mechanics
(Spelling,
Grammar,
APA) and
Information
Literacy
/ 20
just one line or
saying, “Good job” or
41. “I agree.
*Comments are off
topic.
on what the other
student wrote.
building on previous
posts. Comments extend
and deepen meaningful
conversation and may
include a follow-up
question.
No postings for
which to evaluate
language and
grammar
Numerous issues in
any of the following:
grammar, mechanics,
42. spelling, use of slang,
and incomplete or
missing APA
citations and
references. If
required for the
assignment, did not
use course, text,
and/or outside
readings (where
relevant) to support
work.
Some spelling,
grammatical, and/or
structural errors. Some
errors in APA
formatting (citations
and references). If
43. required for the
assignment, utilizes
sources to support
work for initial post but
not comments to other
students. Sources
include course/text
readings but outside
sources (when relevant)
include non-
academic/authoritative,
such as Wikis and .com
resources.
Minor errors in grammar,
mechanics, or spelling in
the initial posting. Minor
errors in APA formatting
(citations and references).
44. If required for the
assignment, utilizes
sources to support work
for both the initial post
and some of the
comments to other
students. Sources include
course and text readings
as well as outside sources
(when relevant) that are
academic and
authoritative (e.g., journal
articles, other text books,
.gov web sites,
professional organization
web sites).
Minor to no errors in
grammar, mechanics, or
45. spelling in both the initial
post and comments to
others. APA formatting is
correct. If required for
the assignment, utilizes
sources to support work
for both the initial post
and the comments to
other students. Sources
include course and text
readings as well as
outside sources (when
relevant) that are
academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles, other
text books, .gov web
sites, professional
46. organization web sites).
1/26/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics
in Healthcare SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359
329&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29
&d2l_bod… 3/3
Close
Unacceptable
0 points
minimum
Emerging (F through D
Range)
1 point minimum
Satisfactory (C
Range)
54 points minimum
Above Average (B
Range)
62 points minimum
Exemplary (A
47. Range)
70 points minimum
2
MHA5030 WEEK 3 LECTURE NOTES
The Importance of Supply in Healthcare
In a traditional economic model, demand is important for supply
as supply tends to create a supporting role and reacts only to
changes in demand. Demand changes may come from price, but
unless demand is changed, supply does not change. In order for
policymakers to make a change in the consumption of an item in
the free market, their main tool is price. They can control the
price or tax the good to suppress the amount of the good that is
desired. As an alternative, they can add a subsidy, for instance,
in agriculture, to encourage greater supply. In healthcare, it is
possible for policymakers to add copayments or deductibles
against insured individuals in order to decrease consumption.
Suppliers, also in healthcare, have additional tools to use to
control consumption in the form of capitation, diagnosis-related
groups, or evidence-based practice guidelines. These tools
commonly used in managed care can be very effective in
controlling excessive use of health services.
In your study and this unit, you will examine assumptions of the
free market, which are supply and demand are independently
determined, firms do not have any market power, and there are
no increasing returns of scale or economies. It is incumbent
upon you to examine how these assumptions of the free market
hold true in healthcare.
If a physician acts as an agent for a patient, then the physician
must know what is best for the patient as well as what the
patient would choose as best for himself or herself. Granting
that a physician generally knows more about what’s good for a
patient, due to variation in education and physicians, the chosen
48. treatment may or may not be best for the patient. In addition, if
the patient has as much information as the physician, the patient
might choose differently.
In addition, you will examine factors such as induced demand,
which may come from a pharmaceutical company that wants the
physician to prescribe a certain drug. It is difficult to determine
when there is induced demand, which supply reacts to, but there
is evidence that it does occur.
Additional Materials
From your course textbook, The Economics of Health
Reconsidered, read the following chapter:
· How Competitive Is the Supply of Healthcare?
From the South University Online Library, read the following
article:
· Unnecessary Care: Is Profit-Driven Healthcare to Blame?
From the Internet, read the following article:
· Mitchell, J. (2010). Effect of physician ownership of specialty
hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers on frequency of use of
outpatient orthopedic surgery. Archives of Surgery, 145(8):
732–738. Retrieved from
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-
abstract/406180
The Profit Motive
In the free market, the profit motive generally leads to
production of goods and services in an efficient way.
Consumers want high-quality products and services at low
prices, and sellers compete in the marketplace to provide them.
Prices are determined in the marketplace by what the market
will bear. This is true if we have several assumptions from
which the consumer can make informed choices. The seller is
not a monopoly, and there are no significant externalities
present that the government might control. So looking at the
profit motive, you will look at two assumptions: firms maximize
49. profits, and this profit maximization results in efficient
production, leading to the highest consumer welfare.
As mentioned earlier, nonprofit organizations do not necessarily
follow these assumptions, and nonprofit organizations make up
a large part of the healthcare marketplace. So it is impor tant
that we look at the differences in behavior of the two ownership
types in order to understand how healthcare reacts to the profit
motive.
Another complication that we encounter while looking at the
healthcare marketplace in regard to the profit motive is the fact
that nonprofit ownership is strong in a hospital ownership; less
dominant in other areas such as hospice care, health insurance,
nursing home care, and dialysis; has very little influence in
ambulatory surgical care specialty hospitals and physician
services, which are mostly for profit; and in the case of
companies that supply products for healthcare, such as
pharmaceuticals, there are generally no nonprofit influences.
From a policy perspective, because nonprofit organizations
generally perform better in terms of quality and community
service, for areas such as surgical centers in the pharmaceutical
industry, it might make sense for the government to add further
regulations to optimize these industries in terms of price.
Additional Materials
From your course textbook, The Economics of Health
Reconsidered, read the following chapter:
· The Profit Motive in Healthcare
From the South University Online Library, read the following
article:
· Competition in Health Care: Its Evolution over the Past
Decade opens in new window
From the Internet, read the following article:
· Mitchell, J. (2010). Effect of physician ownership of specialty
hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers on frequency of use of
outpatient orthopedic surgery. Archives of Surgery, 145(8):
732–738. Retrieved from
50. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-
abstract/406180
The Healthcare Workforce
It may seem obvious that without physicians and nurses, there
would be no healthcare, and this makes the segment of the
workforce absolutely critical to understand.
Complications of meeting the supply requirements of these two
human resources certainly include, in both cases, long
educational requirements and high financial costs to achieve the
necessary levels of expertise required. The current and future
requirements for the healthcare workforce become an important
issue for economists and managers in healthcare administration.
One issue concerns the inelasticity of demand, where the
demand for labor is less than the change in wages and working
conditions for nurses or physicians. With government
reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid controlling
reimbursement, it is difficult for organizations to find
additional funds to help increase supply. Even with insurance
coverage, organizations cannot change prices until the next
contract period, so demand remains inelastic.
In many areas of the country, hospitals have a monopoly and
can control wages and prices, making supply inelastic.
The population of this country is growing at a fairly rapid rate,
so the need for healthcare services continues to expand, maybe
at an even higher rate when the immigrant population comes
from an area with poor healthcare and requires abnormally high
levels of service to make the population healthy. With this and
other factors in mind, there is a serious question of whether we
have an adequate supply of trained medical personnel to support
the population. There is a substantial debate in this country over
whether we have adequate personnel now or for the future.
Clearly, healthcare is complex, and with technology, it becomes
more complex; thus, forecasting the future needs of the country
in healthcare is very difficult. In 1960, physicians made house
calls and worked very long hours, whereas today, physicians
and nurses work a fairly regular work week. Changes such as
51. the working hours have occurred over time, but this has
complicated the ability to forecast workforce requirements
greatly.
In looking at the labor market in healthcare versus the
assumptions of a perfectly competitive market, it seems clear
that there are challenges to be overcome through policy.
Policies that intervene can be developed, but there is risk, and
tampering with this market and can create unintended
consequences. The ability to forecast accurately will be vital to
this effort.
Additional Materials
From your course textbook, The Economics of Health
Reconsidered, read the following chapter:
· The Healthcare Workforce
From the South University Online Library, read the following
articles:
· Could U.S. Hospitals Go the Way of U.S. Airlines?
· Changes in Hospital Competitive Strategy: A New Medical
Arms Race?
· The Nursing Workforce in an Era of Health Care Reform
MHA5030 Week 3 Discussion Instructions
Discussion Questions
Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review
the link Doing Discussion Questions Right, the expanded
grading rubric for the forum below, and any specific
instructions for this topic.
Tasks:
· Discuss three methods of forecasting the future requirements
for demand.
· Discuss measures to meet demand for access to medical care
in the future.
52. · Analyze policy proposals to meet the demands identified.
To support your work, use your course and textbook readings
and also use the South University Online Library. As in all
assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide
references for the citations in APA format.
Provide a substantive 300-500 words) initial discussion posting
addressing each of the components in the discussion question.
Justify your answers with research, examples, and reasoning.
Before the end of the unit, begin commenting on at least two of
your peers' responses. At a minimum, your responses to other
initial posts must be 100 to 200 words each. You can ask
technical questions or generally respond to the overall
experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use
constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the
goal of positive progress. Submit your responses to the
appropriate topic in this Discussion Area.
MHA5030 Week 3 Project Instructions
Instructions
Introduction
Until the early 1960s, healthcare was largely a not-for-profit
business dominated by foundations that employed physicians.
Over time, for-profit organizations have flourished, and in the
case of some sectors, notably pharmaceuticals, organizations are
almost entirely for-profit. There remain differences in the two
organization types, though they both serve the same population.
A number of behaviors are similar, but there are significant
differences. Understanding these differences and the theories
behind the behaviors they create is an important subject for all
healthcare leaders.
Tasks:
· The nonprofit remains an outlier in the healthcare marketplace
as it does not follow the traditional market model in several
respects. Discuss the differences between the two types of
53. organizations in terms of quality, service cost, and price.
· Discuss the type of service provider and the type of
organization in view of the price of service.
· Analyze the need for more policies that support nonprofit
models in the healthcare market.
Submission Details:
· Cover this topic in a 5- to 10-page Microsoft Word document.
Use APA standards for citations and references.
· Cite a minimum of three outside peer-reviewed sources to
support your assertions and save it as Week
3_Project_LastName_FirstInitial. Submit the report to
the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
· Cite any sources using correct APA format on a separate page.