11-Building-Blocks-of a Resilient ICC/IPs

National Commission on Indigenous Peoples
(NCIP) and Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs)
Situation Update

I. Profile of the Indigenous Cultural Communities / Indigenous
Peoples (ICCs/IPs)
II. 4 Bundles of Rights: 36 ICC/IP Rights
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant
ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IV. Ancestral Domains Profile and Other Significant Undertakings
Outline

SOUTHERN & EASTERN MINDANAO (RXI & RXIII)
Ata, Ata Manobo, Bagobo Klata, Bagobo
Tagabawa, Blaan, Banwaon, Dibabawon, Higaonon,
Kagan/Kalagan, Mamanwa, Mandaya,
Mangguangan, Manobo, Mansaka, Matigsalug, Obu
Manuvu, Sama, Tagakaulo, Talaandig
CENTRAL MINDANAO (RXII)
Bagobo Tagabawa, Blaan, Erumanen Ne Menuvu, Manobo
Blit, Manobo Dulangan, Obu, Obu Menuvu, Taboli Manobo,
Tagakaolo, Tboli, Teduray, Tinonanon Monuvu
NORTHERN & WESTERN MINDANAO
(RIX & RX)
Bukidnon, Kolibogan, Sama, Sama Dilaut,
Sama Bangingi, Subanen/Subanon,
Higaonon, Kamigin, Manobo, Matigsalug,
Talaandig, Tigwahanon, Umayamnon,
Yakan,
ISLAND GROUPS & REST OF VISAYAS
(RIVB, RVI & R VII)
Alangan, Ata, Ati, Bangon, Bantoanon,
Batak, Buhid, Cuyonon, Eskaya,
Gubatnon, Hanunuo, Iraya, Negros
Bukidnon, Molbog, Pala’wan, Panay
Bukidnon, Ratagnon, Tagabukid, Taga
Bukid, Tadyawan, Tagbanua, Tagbanua
Calamianem, Tagbanua Tandulanen,
Taobuid
REGION III & REST OF LUZON (R III, RIVA & RV)
Agta, Alta, Abelling, Ayta Ambala, Ayta Sambal, Ayta
Magantsi, Ayta Magbukun, Ayta Mag-indi, Bdjao,
Dumagat, Ilongot/Bugkalot, Kalanguya,
Kabihug/Manide
REGION II
Agta, Ayangan, Bugkalot/Ilongot, Calinga, Gaddang,
Ibanag, Ibatan, Isinai, Itawes, Ivatan, Iwak, Kalanguya-
Ikalahan, Kankanawy, Malaweg, Yapayao, Yogad
CAR & REGION I
Applai, Ayangan, Bago, Balangao, Bontok,
Gaddang, Ibaloi, Iwak, Isneg/Isnag/Yapayao,
Itneg/Tinguian, Kalanguya, Kalinga, Kankanaey,
Karao, Tuwali
14,184,645 IP POPULATION
(16% of the total Population of the country)
● Mindanao: 8,936,326 (63%)
● Luzon: 4,822,779 (34%)
● Visayas: 425,540 (3%)
I. Profile of the Indigenous Cultural Communities / Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs)
Note:
• Projected IP Population using the 2007 annual
population growth rate of 2.16% provided by then
National Statistics Office (NSO)
• Based on the DSWD data, the number of IP
beneficiaries of Social Amelioration Program (SAP) for
FY 2020, totalled to 20 Million individuals or 750,000
families.

II. 4 Bundles of Rights: 36 ICC/IP Rights
Republic of the Philippines
National Commission on Indigenous People
36 Rights of the ICCs/IPs under the IPRA and its IRR
Right to Self-governance
and Empowerment
11. Authentication of Indigenous leadership
Titles and Certificates of tribal membership
12. Recognition of Socio-Political Institutions
and structures
13. Right to use their own commonly accepted
justice systems, conflict resolution
institutions, peace building processes or
mechanisms and other customary laws and
practices within their respective
communities and as may be compatible
with the national legal system and with
internationally recognized human rights
14. Right to participate in decision-making
(mandatory representation in policy-
making bodies and other local legislative
councils)
15. Right to determine and decide priorities for
development
16. Tribal barangays
17. Right to Organize and Associate for
collective actions
Right to Ancestral
Domains/Lands
1. Right of ownership
2. Right to develop lands and
natural resources
3. Right to stay in territories
4. Right in case of
displacement
5. Right to regulate entry of
migrants
6. Right to safe and clean air
and water
7. Right to claim parts of
reservation
8. Right to resolve conflict
9. Right to transfer
land/property
10. Right to redemption
Right to Social Justice and
Human Rights
18. Equal protection and non-
discrimination of ICCs/Ips
19. Rights during armed
conflict
20. Freedom from
Discrimination and Right
to equal opportunity and
treatment
21. Basic services
22. Equal rights for women
23. Rights of Children and
Youth
24. Right to integrated
system of education/right
to education
Right to Cultural Integrity
25. Protection of Indigenous
Culture, Traditions and
Institutions
26. Right to establish and control
their educational and learning
systems
27. Recognition of cultural diversity
28. Recognition of customary laws
and practices governing civil
relations
29. Right to name, identity and
history
30. Protection of Community
Intellectual Rights
31. Rights to religious, cultural sites
and ceremonies
32. Right to Indigenous Spiritual
Beliefs and Traditions, and
Protection of Sacred Places
33. Rights to IKSP
34. Protection of biological and
genetic resources
35. Sustainable agro-technical
development
36. Right to receive from the
national gov’t funds for
archeological and
historical sites

1. Confirmation of IPS
2. Registration &
Accreditation of IPO
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
Process
4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization of CP:
FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
Indigenous Political Structure (IPS)
Strengthening and Operationalization
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral
Domains
a. SEC. 13. Self-
Governance.
b. SEC. 20. Means for
Development/Empowerm
ent of ICCs/lPs.
c. Section 3i: Indigenous
Political Structures
d. IRR: Sec 1 and 4, part 1
rule IV
IPRA Provision
Administrative Order No. 2, S.
2012 (The General Guidelines
on the Confirmation of IPS and
the Registration of IPOs)
Guidelines, Policies, SOPs
a. Non-compliance with State obligation to
recognize the inherent right of ICCs/IPs right to
self-governance. Non-recognition of their right
to self-governance; Mainstream
governance/management of AD may invade
customary processes of ICCs/management of
their AD and affairs.
b. Community unrepairable divisions and conflict
will continue.
c. Domination of few who are exposed to the
mainstream culture of cash
economy, individualism, materialism and
consumerisms at the expense of weak
members
d. Customary laws, sacred traditions and IKSP in
general will forever be lost. It will become a
thing of the past
e. Collective rights will be gone
f. Ancestral domains will be divided into pieces
and will land in the hands of the non IPs
Implications

2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Indigenous Political Structure (IPS)
Domains
1. IPS/COE & Traditional Leaders Confirmation (OEHR);
a. Who are the traditional leaders
b. Who are the clan leaders
c. Traditional institutions
d. Hindrance for strengthening & unification of the IPS
e. Causes of leadership disunity, if there is any
f. Does the community understand well what is IPS & its equivalent in the community
g. Current strength of the IPS
h. What hinders the determination & confirmation of the IPS
I. What threatened the current IPS or the leadership in the community
j. Any opportunity to further strengthen the IPS
k. Is there harmony, unity & cohesiveness between the IPS, IPO, ADMO & IPMRs;

Indigenous Peoples Organization (IPO)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
2 Registration &
a. SEC. 19. Role of Peoples
Organizations.
b. Section 3 (n) People's
Organization
c. IRR: Sec 1, 2, & 3 part II
rule IV.
2012 (The General Guidelines
on the Confirmation of IPS and
the Registration of IPOs)
a. IP collective economic rights will not be
realized but will go to the non IP
businessmen
b. Without the capacitated IPO the technical
and economic assistance to the IPS will be
taken by NGO
c. Non-compliance with State obligation to
recognize and respect the role of ICC/IP
organizations
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
Domains

Indigenous Peoples Organization (IPO)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
2 Registration &
Domains
2. Setting-up of the IPO. Its Accreditation & Registration (OEHR);
a. Is the IPO existing? registered & accredited? To where?
b. If not accredited or registered, why?
c. What hinder the non-organizing? Problems encountered?
d. Does the community appreciate the importance & significance of an IPO?
e. What is the current strength of the IPO?
f. Any current situation to consolidate the unity of the IPO or threaten the organization?
g. What is the organizational structure of the IPO? Who are the leaders? Manner of
selection?
h. Is there cohesiveness, unity of efforts & harmony between the IPO, IPS, ADMO &
IPMR;

Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT)/Certificate of
Ancestral Land Title (CALT)/Clans (Lot Area)
(to be operated by IPO under the supervision of IPS)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
a. SEC. 4. Concept of Ancestral
Lands/Domains.
b. SEC. 5. Indigenous Concept of
Ownership.
c. SEC. 6. Composition of Ancestral
Lands/Domains.
d. SEC. 7. Rights to Ancestral
Domains.
e. SEC. 8. Rights to Ancestral
Lands.
f. SEC. 9. Responsibilities of
ICCs/IPs to their Ancestral
Domains.
g. SEC. 10. Unauthorized and
Unlawful Intrusion.
h. SEC. 11. Recognition of Ancestral
Domain Rights.
i. SEC. 51. Delineation and
Recognition of Ancestral
Domains.
j. SEC. 52. Delineation Process.
k. SEC. 53. Identification,
Delineation and Certification of
Ancestral Lands
l. SEC. 54. Fraudulent Claims.
m. SEC. 55. Communal Rights.
2020 (Rules on Delineation and
Recognition of Ancestral
Domains and Ancestral Lands of
2020 and other Processes)
a. Non-compliance with State obligation to
recognize ICCs/IPs rights to ownership of
their AD/AL and other related rights thereto;
Continued encroachment of ADs by non-
IPs;
b. With its implementation, the rights of
ICCs/IPs to their ancestral domains/lands
(ADS/ALs) are recognized and respected.
c. Its non-implementation will result to the
non-fulfillment of the Constitutional
mandate of protecting the ICCs/IPs’ rights
to their ADs/ALs .
d. AD will be divided into pieces and will go to
the hands of migrants/non-IPs
e. Total displacement of IPs of the present
generation, as well as the next generation
f. Entire being of the IPs, their culture,
histories will disappear
3. CADT/CALT
Delineation Process
Domains

Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT)/Certificate of
Ancestral Land Title (CALT)/Clans (Lot Area)
(to be operated by IPO under the supervision of IPS)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
3. CADT/CALT
Delineation Process
Domains
3. CADT/CALT Delienation & Registration (ADO/LAO);
a. Is the AD/AL already delineated? When? Who financed? If no why?
b. Is the AD/AL already registered? When? Who financed? If no, why?
c. Is the AD/AL on process? When started to be processed? Who financed? What stage?
d. Is AD/AL is not applied for? Why?
e. What are the weakness & threats within the community that prevented its processing of
AD/AL?

Ancestral Domain Management Office (ADMO)
(Door)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
4. Establishment of
ADMO
a. Section 3 (e)
Communal Claims
b. Section 3 (o)
Sustainable Traditional
Resource Rights
c. SEC. 5. Indigenous
Concept of Ownership.
d. Section 7 (b) Right to
Develop Lands and
Natural Resources.
e. SEC. 19. Role of
Peoples Organizations.
f. SEC. 20. Means for
Development/Empower
ment of ICCs/lPs.
g. IRR: Sec 1, 2, & 3 part
II rule IV.
Guidelines : none;
But this should be found in the
ADSDPP and CRDP
a. If no ADMO established, all resources, and
other economic benefits derived therefrom
will not be fully enjoyed by the community.
b. With its implementation, the ICCs/IP’s right
to self-governance and self-determination is
fortified and matters related its exercise will
be efficiently handled given the
establishment of ADMO per ancestral
domain.
c. Transactions and dealings by
migrants, NGOs, businessmen, investors
and even Government agencies will be
made directly to individual members to the
detriment of the whole domain, and creating
conflicts and confusion in the community
Domains

Ancestral Domain Management Office (ADMO)
(Door)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
4. Establishment of
ADMO
Domains
4. ADMO Manning & Operationalization (OEHR & ADO);
a. Is the ADMO already set-up?
b. Who are members assigned?
c. How are they chosen? Skills of management members and the different positions
identified?
d. Basis for selection?
e. Any problems encountered by the ADMO?
f. Any opportunities the ADMO can explore?
g. What is the weakness & strength of the current ADMO?
h. What is/are the threat encountered by the ADMO?
i. If the ADMO is not yet set-up? Why? What are plans of NCIP & the community?;
j. Is there unity, cohesiveness and harmony between ADMO, IPO, IPS & IPMRs?;

Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and
Protection Plan (ADSDPP)
(Kitchen)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
a. Section 7 (b) Right to
Develop Lands and
Natural Resources.
b. SEC. 17. Right to
Determine and
Decide Priorities for
Development.
c. SEC. 58.
Environmental
Considerations.
a. Administrative Order No. 2, S.
2018 (Revised Guidelines on
the Formulation of ADSDPP)
b. Guidelines : FPIC guidelines
a. If there is no ADSDPP formulation, plans of ICCs/IPs
for the development, conservation and management
of their ADs will not be known; overlap of other plans
prepared by other agencies that may not consider
ICCs/IPs plans/priorities.(ADSDPP formulation is a
must as its implementation will redound to the benefit
of the ICCs/IPs in their exercise of their right to
determine and decide their own priorities for
development affecting their lives, beliefs, institutions,
spiritual well-being, and the lands they own, occupy
or use. It will also enable them to participate in the
formulation, implementation and evaluation of
policies, plans and programs for national, regional
and local development which may directly affect
them.)
b. Conflict of access to wealth and resources
c. IP culture on sharing distorted
d. Opportunity of other interested parties to meddle with
the AD, its management and development
Domains

Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and
Protection Plan (ADSDPP)
(Kitchen)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Domains
5. ADSDPP Formulation & Institutionalization (All Bureaus);
a. Is the ADSDPP already formulated? What year? Who financed?
b. If more than 5 years already, what has it accomplished? Why?
c. How was it institutionalized and operationalized?
d. Any plans to update the ADSDPP? When?
e. If not yet crafted, why? When is the plan to be crafted? Why?

Inside view
Community Resource Management Development Plan
(CRMDP)
(Living Room)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
6. IP Wealth
Management - CRMDP
Formulation;
Develop Lands and
Natural Resources.
b. SEC. 17. Right to
Determine and
Decide Priorities for
Development.
2012 (The Revised Guidelines
on FPIC and Related
Processes)
a. As a social justice measure, its implementation will
ensure proper management, development, and
utilization of the resources to benefit not only the
present generation but also the generations to come.
The CRDP’s non-formulation could result to a lack of
a clear plan through which funds and resources are
allocated and disbursed. The scenario poses the
danger of the funds and other resources being
utilized by a few individuals, which ultimately results
to non-enjoyment by the IP community as a whole.
The same will also lead to the lack of transparency
and accountability on the part of the IPOs and the
NCIP will experience difficulty in monitoring the
financial aspect flowing from royalties, funds,
benefits and other resources pursuant to the Office’s
mandate to protect the well-being and promote the
rights of ICCs/IPs.
Domains

Inside view
Community Resource Management Development Plan
(CRMDP)
(Living Room)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
6. IP Wealth
Management - CRMDP
Formulation;
Domains
6. CMRDP Institutionalization (OSESSC/OEHR/LAO/ADO);
a. Are members of the community understand the need of a CMRDP;
b. Does the community drafted already the general local guidelines and/or detailed
CMRDP for a particular project;
c. What are the features inside the CMRDP?
d. Does it parallel or comply to the National guidelines and operationalization with
consideration to customary practices;
e. If there is no CMRDP yet and community bank account, when will they do it?

Exercise of Priority Rights (EPR)
(Stairs)
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)
(Gate)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
7. Institutionalization of
Certificate Precondition:
FPIC & EPR
Develop Lands and
Natural Resources.
b. Section 7 (c) Right to
Stay in the Territories.
c. SEC. 32. Community
Intellectual Rights.
d. SEC. 35. Access to
Biological and Genetic
Resources.
e. SEC. 57. Natural
Resources within
Ancestral Domains.
f. SEC. 58.
Environmental
Considerations.
g. SEC. 59. Certification
Precondition.
on FPIC and Related
Processes) & Guidelines on
EPR
a. Violation of the right to FPIC is a violation of
right to ownership of their AD and right to
develop their lands and resources. It may
also lead to increased introduction and
implementation of programs, projects and
activities that may not be beneficial to the
ICCs/IPs and their ADs.
b. Its implementation will amplify the statutory
provisions on the ICCs/IPs’ exercise of their
rights to their ancestral domains/lands,
social justice and human rights, self-
governance and empowerment, and cultural
integrity.
c. Programs, projects and activities, and
resource utilization and extraction will only
be for the benefit of the other interested
groups
d. IP community members will individually
approach investors to offer their resources
Domains

Exercise of Priority Rights (EPR)
(Stairs)
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)
(Gate)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
7. Institutionalization of
Certificate Precondition:
FPIC & EPR
Domains
7. FPIC/EPR Institutionalization (ADO/LAO/OSESSC);
a. Is the FPIC & EPR Process clearly understood by all members of the community?
b. How many FPIC & EPR processes had been undertaken already in the community;
c. What are the impacts of these processes to the well being of these community;
d. Who are those proponents and individuals who did not not submit to the FPIC process?
When and Why? Action/s of NCIP, Community & LGUs?

Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representation (IPMR)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Local Legislative Bodies;
a. SEC. 16. Right to
Participate in
Decision-Making
b. IRR : Sec 6,
a. Administrative Order No. 3,
S. 2018 (Revised National
Guidelines for the
Mandatory Representation
of Indigenous Peoples in
Local Legislative Councils
and Policy-making Bodies)
b. Guidelines on IPMR
a. Violation of the right of ICCs/IPs to
participate in decision-making; there may
be difficulty to raise ICCs/IPs concerns that
need to be addressed by local government
unit policy and decision making bodies.
b. Ensure the empowerment of the ICCs/IPs
by enabling them to participate fully in all
levels of decision making.
c. Collective right to representation will be lost
and everything will soon be politicized
d. Politicians will take control and the essence
of the IP representation will be bastardized
e. Affects IP genuine participation in the
formulation, implementations and
evaluation of plans, policies programs for
national, regional and local developments
which may affects their lives, beliefs,
institutions, spiritual well-being and to the
land they own, occupy and use
Domains

Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representation (IPMR)
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Local Legislative Bodies;
Domains
8. IPMR Selection and Institutionalization (OEHR/LAO/OECH);
a. Are all IP communities deserving to have IPMRs in the Barangays, City/Municipal &
Provincial have/has already?
b. Are there questions and protest in the selection process?;
c. Are there questions and protest in the crafting of the local guidelines? Who are the
signatories? How was it crafted & the parties involved?
d. How was the protest handled before confirming the candidate?;
e. Does all selection process have corresponding and documented local guidelines
properly signed?;
f. If with no IPMRs yet, what is the plan of NCIP & the community?;

Community, Investors, Government Agencies & NCIP
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
MOA/MOU/MOC
Develop Lands and
Natural Resources.
b. Section 7 (c) Right to
Stay in the Territories.
c. SEC. 32. Community
Intellectual Rights.
d. SEC. 35. Access to
Biological and Genetic
Resources.
e. SEC. 57. Natural
Resources within
Ancestral Domains.
f. SEC. 58.
Environmental
Considerations.
g. SEC. 59. Certification
Precondition.
on FPIC and Related
Processes)
Disparity in protection and benefits due to
ICCs/IPs; Non-compliance with FPIC
requirements
Domains

Community, Investors, Government Agencies & NCIP
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
MOA/MOU/MOC
Domains
9. MOA/MOU/MOC Institutionalization (ADO/LAO/OSESSC/OEHR/OECH);
a. Is the community see the value and importance of having an MOU, MOA & MOC when
entering into a agreement?
b. If no, Why? What actions to be done by NCIP? Community?
c. Are there groups inside and outside the community who tends to corrupt the MOA
Formulation process? Why? Our actions taken? And community action?
d. How many MOAs, MOUs & MOC was entered by the Community: Without the
knowledge of NCIP and what are these? and with the participation of NCIP & what are
these?;

Government Socio-Economic Works
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives;
a. SEC. 25. Basic
Services.
b. SEC. 36. Sustainable
Agro-Technical
Development.
c. Sec 7-b, sec 46-d
(mandate of osessc)
sec 25
Guidelines: no guidelines yet a. Non-compliance with State obligation to
guarantee the right of ICCs/IPs to basic
services and ensure the continuing
improvement of their economic and social
conditions, as well as the State’s obligation
to ensure successful sustainable
development of ICCs/IPs.
b. Basic services and economic activities will
be left to the determination of other
agencies, NGOs and individuals with
attached interest
c. CADT alone cannot protect and prevent the
IPs from selling land to non IP
Domains

Government Socio-Economic Works
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives;
Domains
10. IP Cooperative & Socio-economic works Institutionalization (All Bureaus);
a. Is there an existing community wide cooperative? If yes, is the structure effective and
functional? If no, Why? What are the plans to enhance the same?
b. If there is no cooperative, what is the set-up done by the community to accomplish the
same objective/s? Is it functional and effective?
c. What are the existing socio-economic programs in the AD?;
d. Any incoming socio-economic programs? Agencies involved?;
e. Are the communities have existing correspondence with government agencies? How
does NCIP come into the picture in helping out in the linkaging & networking with
agencies & even private/public sector?;
f. Is there any problem encountered?
g. What are the opportunities available to advance the collaboration between the
communities and agencies of government?;
h. Have we let the community leaders engage CDA to be trained on Cooperative
Movement?

Bagani
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Defense System
Defense System
(Fence)
a. Section 3 (e) Communal
Claims
b. Section 3 (f) Customary
Laws
c. Section 3i: Indigenous
Political Structures
d. Section 7 (h): Right to
Resolve Conflict
e. SEC. 10. Unauthorized and
Unlawful Intrusion.
f. SEC. 15. Justice System,
Conflict Resolution
Institutions, and Peace
Building Processes.
g. SEC. 29. Protection of
Indigenous Culture,
Traditions, and Institutions.
h. SEC. 63. Applicable Laws.
i. SEC. 65. Primacy of
Customary Laws and
Practices.
Guidelines: no guidelines yet a. The establishment of an Ancestral Domains
Defense System will help the ICCs/IPs in
regulating the entry of migrants and will
help prevent the degradation of their
culture, customs and institutions.
b. The non-establishment thereof will weaken
the IPS of the ICCs/IPs and could lead to
infiltration by leftist groups and other
opportunistic individuals and/or groups.
c. IP defense system is one of the many
systems under an indigenous institutions
that stood for centuries
d. Doing nothing about this will result to:
uncontrolled intrusion to the ancestral
domains & unregulated utilization of
resources by outsiders
Domains

Bagani
2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Defense System
Defense System
(Fence)
Domains
11. Ancestral Domain Defense and Security (ADDS) Institutionalization
(OEHR/OECH/LAO/ADO);
a. Does the community appreciate and understand the ADDS that we are talking about?
Are we of the same page or are we both aligned? If no, what actions are we doing?
b. Is there an existing ADDS framework in the community back up by their customary
practices? If yes, when it was set-up?;
c. Have we documented the customary practices on “Securing the Ancestral Domain and
Enforcing the Customary laws and decision of the Elders?;
d. Have the community already engage the LGUs, PNP & AFP re community defense &
security? If yes, what have been discussed and when? If it’s no, what are the plans?;

2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
In the general, if the 11 blocks are not implemented
properly NCIP's reason to exist will cease & the IPs
lives, beliefs, institutions, spiritual well-being and the
lands they own, occupy and use will negatively
be affected.
Domains

2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
Support in the implementation of the 11 building
blocks will bring to fruition the purpose of the
enactment of the IPRA-correcting historical injustice
and the recognition, respect, protection and
promotion of ICC/IP rights
Domains

2. Registration &
Process
CRMDP Formulation;
FPIC & EPR
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Defense System
It also emphasizes that ADs are privately owned by
ICCs/IPs and cannot be sold, disposed or destroyed,
and that ICCs/IPs have the right to manage the same
in accordance with their customs, traditions and
institutions.
Domains

Estimated 1,362 ancestral
domains nationwide
covering 14,459,579.42
has. equivalent to 48.20%
of 30M has. PH land area
11 Building Blocks
1. IPS
2. IPO
3. CADT/CALT
4. ADMO
5. ADSDPP
6. CRMDP
7. FPIC & EPR
8. IPMR
9. MOA/MOU/MOC
10.Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11.Ancestral Domain
Defense System
31
649
248/259
On process/for
Determination
171
11
415
4,301
461
235
0
IPS = 13%
IPO = 70%
CADT = 27%
ADMO = 27%
ADSDPP = 18%
CRMDP = 4%
ADDS = 0%
LEGEND
CADTs
927 – Identified ADs
248 – Approved
214 – On-process
CALTs
435 – Identified AL
259 – Approved
176 – On-process
IV. Ancestral Domains Profile and Other Significant Undertakings

ANCESTRAL DOMAINS ARE NOT FOR SALE!!!
Pursuant to Section 5, RA 8371 the indigenous concept of
ownership sustains the view that ancestral domains and all
resources found therein shall serve as the material bases of their
cultural integrity. The indigenous concept of ownership generally
holds that ancestral domains are the ICC's/IP's private but
community property which belongs to all generations and therefore
cannot be sold, disposed or destroyed. It likewise covers
sustainable traditional resource rights.

NCIP National Advisory No. NA-2020-08-001, S. 2020

11-Building-Blocks-of a Resilient ICC/IPs

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to 11-Building-Blocks-of a Resilient ICC/IPs

Similar to 11-Building-Blocks-of a Resilient ICC/IPs (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

11-Building-Blocks-of a Resilient ICC/IPs