1. Which of the following is one of the major purposes of a settlement conference? [removed] To facilitate the settlement of a case [removed] To structure a settlement payment schedule [removed] To conduct discovery for a case [removed] To contest the local court rules 2. There are two general partners, each of whom contributes $5,000 in capital to a limited partnership. There are two limited partners, each of whom contributes $20,000. The total amount of capital contributed is $50,000. The limited partnership agreement does not stipulate how profits and losses are to be allocated. Assume that the limited partnership makes $300,000 in profits. Under the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act ( RULPA), how much would each partner receive? [removed] Each general partner would receive $120,000, and each limited partner would receive $30,000. [removed] Each general partner would receive $50,000, and each limited partner would receive $100,000. [removed] All partners would receive $75,000, regardless of whether he or she is a general or limited partner. [removed] Each general partner would receive $30,000, and each limited partner would receive $120,000. 3. Which of the following is true of The Federal Arbitration Act? [removed] It provides that arbitration agreements are valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. [removed] It permits an appeal for all arbitration awards. [removed] It applies only to breach of contract disputes. [removed] It governs all types of alternative dispute resolution. 4. Which of the following is true regarding mediation? [removed] A mediator does not make a decision or an award. [removed] Was created by the Federal Mediation Act of 1925. [removed] If a settlement agreement is not reached in mediation, then the parties hire a new mediator. [removed] A settlement agreement is never reached with a mediator 5. Fred and Ginger are general partners in a business. They decide to purchase a building for the partnership. Ginger will put up the money for the building, and Fred will complete the remodeling. While inspecting the building, Fred is informed that the building is packed full of asbestos. He fails to tell Ginger of the presence of the substance. They buy the building and go into business. During the remodeling of the building, people from the neighborhood begin complaining about the dust from the building. Some of them even threaten to sue. Who is liable? [removed] Ginger is liable because she is the one who purchased the building. Fred is not liable, even though he had actual knowledge, because he did not purchase the building. [removed] Fred is liable because he was put on notice of the presence of the substance. Ginger is not liable because she did not have actual knowledge. [removed] Neither Ginger nor Fred are liable personally, nor is the partnership, as they did not put the substance in the building. [removed] Both Ginger and Fred are liable, regardless of the circumstances, by virtue of the fact that they are.