SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2014) 28, 380– 387 
www.sciencedirect.com 
www.rbmonline.com 
ARTICLE 
Chromosomal complement and clinical 
relevance of multinucleated embryos in 
PGD and PGS cycles 
Ahmet Yilmaz a, Li Zhang a, Xiao Yun Zhang a, Weon-Young Son a, 
Hananel Holzer a,b, Asangla Ao a,b,c,* 
a MUHC Reproductive Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; c Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, 
Canada 
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: asangla.ao@muhc.mcgill.ca (A Ao). 
Dr. Ahmet Yilmaz completed his postdoctoral training at the McGill University, Department of Human Genetics 
working on inherited cancer syndromes and development of assays to test protein function in the budding yeast 
Saccharomyces cerevisae. He was a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research/MCETC postdoctoral 
fellowship award. He is currently a research associate at the MUHC-RC specializing in preimplantation genetic 
diagnosis of human embryos. His research interests include detection of aneuploidy, mosaicism and 
chromosome translocations in human embryos. 
Abstract The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence and clinical implications of multinucleation in 
blastomeres biopsied from cleavage-stage embryos obtained from patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for 
aneuploidies or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for translocations or single-gene defects (SGD). A total of 3515 embryos 
were obtained from 306 couples in 380 PGD or PGS cycles. Incidence of multinucleation, chromosomal complement in multinucle-ated 
(MN) and sibling embryos and the characteristics of MN embryos resulting in healthy births were investigated. Of all cycles, 
41.3% involved at least one MN embryo. There were more uniformly diploid than uniformly haploid nuclei (22.0% versus 7.9%, 
P < 0.01). The most common form of abnormality was chaotic chromosomal complement (39.9%, 147/368). Transfer of embryos 
that had MN blastomeres free of the genetic abnormalities tested resulted in three healthy deliveries. It is concluded that, although 
the majority of MN blastomeres are chromosomally abnormal, healthy births are possible after transfer of embryos containing these 
blastomeres subjected to genetic analysis. As far as is known, this is the first report of healthy births after transfer of embryos with 
MN blastomeres tested for translocations or SGD in PGD cycles. RBMOnline 
Crown copyright ª 2013, Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. 
KEYWORDS: FISH, human embryos, multinucleation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic screening, translocations 
1472-6483/$ - see front matter Crown copyright ª 2013, Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. All rights 
reserved. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.003
Multinucleation in human embryos 381 
Introduction 
Genetic analysis for selection of genetically healthy 
embryos for transfer is an established treatment option 
offered to patients referred due to advanced maternal age, 
translocations or single-gene defects (SGD) (Harper and 
Sengupta, 2012; Munne, 2003). Preimplantation genetic 
screening (PGS) for aneuploidies or preimplantation 
genetic diagnosis (PGD) of SGD or translocations performed 
at the cleavage stages of embryonic development involves 
removal of blastomere(s) from the embryo. However, 
some of these removed blastomeres may contain more 
than one nuclei (i.e. bi- or multinucleated (MN)), compli-cating 
the genetic diagnosis because each nucleus may 
be haploid, diploid, aneuploid or chaotic (Xanthopoulou 
et al., 2011). 
Multinucleation is one of the most common nuclear 
abnormalities seen in human embryos (Hardy et al., 1993). 
Much research effort has been spent to try to explain how 
and why multinucleation occurs. Karyokinesis without 
cytokinesis (Hardy et al., 1993) that may result from 
defects in structure and/or function of the extra- or intra-cellular 
elements, culture reagents or conditions (De La 
Fuente and King, 1998; Chatzimeletiou et al., 2005; Wang 
et al., 2000) or suboptimal ovarian stimulation regimes 
(Van Royen et al., 2003) have been proposed as plausible 
explanations. However, the fate of MN human embryos is 
still subject to controversy in the literature. Some authors 
have suggested that multinucleation may represent a 
major pathway leading to chromosomal chaos and 
subsequent developmental arrest (Chatzimeletiou et al., 
2005) whereas others have reported the development of 
embryos fully binucleated on day 2 post insemination into 
chromosomally normal diploid blastocysts (Staessen and 
Van Steirteghem, 1998). 
The current literature on chromosomal abnormality rates 
in MN embryos in PGD and PGS cycles is limited. Although 
chromosomal complement in MN embryos after fixation 
and staining of the nuclei (Xanthopoulou et al., 2011) as 
well as pregnancy after transfer of MN embryos not sub-jected 
to genetic analysis have been reported previously 
(Balakier and Cadesky, 1997), there are no reports of 
healthy births after the transfer of embryos with MN blasto-meres 
tested for translocations or SGD in PGD cycles. 
Consequently, it is currently unknown what type, if any, 
of chromosomal complement in MN blastomeres may be 
associated with healthy births. This may become an 
important issue in PGD cycles where only MN embryos are 
available for transfer. 
A thorough investigation of the frequency and clinical 
outcome of multinucleation in blastomeres sampled from 
preimplantation embryos may help not only embryologists 
and clinicians in identifying the type(s) of MN embryos 
that may result in healthy births but also basic researchers 
investigating cellular mechanisms leading to multinucle-ation 
and chromosome segregation in early human 
embryos. The aim of this study was to help to achieve 
both of these objectives by investigating frequency, type 
and clinical relevance of MN embryos in PGD and PGS 
cycles. 
Materials and methods 
Patient details 
This study retrospectively analyzed data to obtain the mul-tinucleation 
rate in 3515 cleavage-stage embryos obtained 
from 306 couples (219 PGS, 41 translocation and 46 SGD) 
who underwent 380 PGD or PGS cycles (267 PGS, 58 
translocation and 55 SGD) at the McGill University Health 
Centre – Reproductive Centre (MUHC-RC) in Montreal, 
Quebec, Canada. The data were collected from March 1998 
to November 2011. These projects were approved by the 
Royal Victoria Hospital – MUHC Office of Research Ethics 
(mosaicism: SUR-99-825, continuing review approved 20 
December 2012; SGD: SUR-99-781, continuing review 
approved 30 March 2010). 
Definitions 
Blastomeres containing two or more nuclei or an embryo 
with at least one MN blastomere were considered MN. A 
cycle was defined as MN when at least one MN embryo was 
obtained. Diagnosis of multinucleation was based on micros-copy 
as well as spreading and staining of nuclei in 3120 
embryos tested for translocation or screened for aneu-ploidy. 
Diagnosis of multinucleation was based on micro-scopic 
evidence obtained using a high-power inverted 
microscope in 395 embryos tested for SGD. Each blastomere 
was carefully examined and only those with clearly more 
than one nucleus were included in the analysis. Based on 
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals, embryos 
were classified as ‘chaotic’ whenever more than two chro-mosomes 
were aneuploid or complex segregation patterns 
were observed. Blastomeres were classified as ‘uniformly 
haploid’ or ‘uniformly diploid’ when each nucleus consisted 
of one or two sets, respectively, of all chromosomes tested. 
Embryo quality was visually assessed and recorded on day 3 
post insemination and again on the day of transfer. Clinical 
pregnancy rate was defined as the number of cycles with at 
least one gestational sac divided by the total number of 
cycles. Implantation rate was obtained by dividing the total 
number of gestational sacs obtained in all cycles by the total 
number of embryos transferred. 
Embryo biopsy, FISH and multiplex PCR 
Embryos were biopsied on day 3 post insemination in a drop 
of Ca2+ and Mg2+-free biopsy medium (Cook Canada) using an 
infrared diode laser in computer-controlled non-contact 
mode (Hamilton Thorn, MA, USA). A single blastomere was 
removed and spread on a glass slide using spreading buffer 
(0.1% Tween 20, 0.01 mol HCl; Zhang et al., 2010), except 
that two cells were removed from 42 embryos. 
Genetic analysis was performed using multicolour FISH 
for PGS and testing for translocations. FISH was performed 
in two or three rounds using probes specific for chromo-somes 
13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in aneuploidy screening 
cases. Only signals from CEP probes were included in the 
analysis of reciprocal translocations to remove effects of 
translocations on aneuploidy rates.
382 A Yilmaz et al. 
All reagents were purchased from Sigma (Ontario, 
Canada) except that the FISH probes were purchased from 
Intermedico (Ontario, Canada), a Canadian distributor of 
Abbott Molecular products. Technical details of FISH can 
be found elsewhere (Bielanska et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 
2010). Embryos that were donated for research and not 
suitable for transfer or freezing were also analysed using 
the same FISH probes used on day 3 post insemination. Sta-tistical 
analysis was performed using F-test for continuous 
and chi-squared test for categorical data with the signifi-cance 
level set at P = 0.05. 
For SGD testing, blastomeres were washed in PBS with 
bovine serum albumin and transferred into 5 ll alkaline lysis 
buffer (200 mmol KOH, 50 mmol dithiothreitol) in 0.2 ml 
PCR tubes. The genetic analysis was performed as described 
previously (Dean et al., 2006). Briefly, fluorescently labelled 
PCR primers were used to amplify the desired mutation(s) 
and the flanking linked short tandem repeat (STR) markers 
in nested multiplex PCR reactions. Amplification as well as 
the allelic dropout ratios (i.e. number of amplification fail-ures 
in one of the alleles of a heterozygous locus divided by 
the total number of amplified loci) was obtained using 
patients’ lymphocytes before each test. 
Molecular techniques such as restriction digestion, frag-ment 
analysis and mini sequencing were used to determine 
the disease status of each allele. Information obtained from 
the STR markers was used for haplotyping and pedigrees 
were constructed based on the inheritance patterns of the 
markers. Minisequencing and fragment analysis were per-formed 
using a ABI 3130 genetic analyser and GeneMapper 
software (Applied Biosystems). 
Results 
A total of 6086 cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) were col-lected, 
3916 of which were fertilized normally. In PGS and 
translocation cases, multinucleation rates obtained by 
microscopy (6.1%, 189/3120) and spreading of nuclei (5.4%, 
167/3120) were similar. The multinucleation rate in SGD 
cycles was 6.1% (24/395). Overall, 157 of 380 PGD cycles 
(41.3%) had at least one MN embryo (Table 1). The clinical 
pregnancy rates in couples with MN embryo(s) referred for 
PGS, PGD for translocation or PGD for SGD were 34.8%, 
38.5% and 31.6%, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rates 
in non-MN cycles in these patients were 35.4%, 28.1% and 
25.0%, respectively. None of these differences in clinical 
pregnancy rates between MN and non-MN cycles were statis-tically 
significant. The implantation rate in MN cycles was 
21.6%, 30.0% and 34.8%, respectively, and the implantation 
rate in non-MN cycles was 22.5%, 23.1% and 26.1%, respec-tively. 
These differences in implantation rates between 
MN and non-MN cycles were not statistically significant. 
Multinucleation in an embryo did not appear to be asso-ciated 
with multinucleation in sibling embryos. In the 
majority of MN cycles, only one (68.2%) or two (27.1%) MN 
embryos were obtained; three or more MN embryos were 
collected in only 4.7% of cycles. Age of patients in MN 
(mean ± SD, 36.1 ± 5.0 years) and mononucleated (36.7 ± 
4.5 years) cycles were similar (not statistically significant). 
Additionally, number of MN embryos obtained per cycle 
did not differ when patients were categorized into three 
groups based on their age (i.e. 35, 36–39 and 40 years). 
In order to identify possible associations between multinu-cleation 
rate and number of COC collected per cycle, MN 
embryos were categorized into the following four groups 
based on the number of COC collected per cycle: A (10 
COC or less), B (11–15), C (16–20) and D (over 20 COC). Per-centage 
multinucleation in groups A, B, C and D was 24.3% 
(18/74), 39.3% (44/112), 35.8% (34/95) and 51.9% (42/81), 
respectively, indicating that rate of multinucleation was 
higher in cycles with larger number of COC collected 
(P  0.01). Of all cycles, 37.3% (69/185), 42.9% (42/98) 
and 45.4% (44/97) were MN in patients who had 
one, two and three or more total PGD or PGS cycles, respec-tively. 
MN embryos, in general, were of poor quality when 
graded subjectively. 
The chromosomal complement in nuclei with valid FISH 
results for at least two chromosomes in MN blastomeres is 
presented in Table 2. Day-3 FISH results were available in 
368 nuclei obtained from 189 blastomeres in translocation 
and PGS cycles. Although conclusive microscopic evidence 
showed the presence of at least two nuclei in all of the 
189 blastomeres included in this table, only one nucleus 
was found in 4 and 18 blastomeres when 2 or 3 probes and 
5 probes, respectively, were used in FISH analysis. 
Nuclei were grouped based on the number of chromo-somes 
screened to determine possible changes in aneu-ploidy 
rates due to number of chromosomes analysed. The 
nuclei were then divided into three subcategories based 
on the number of nuclei found in each blastomere after 
spreading. The majority of MN blastomeres (82.5%) had only 
two nuclei after spreading. The remaining blastomeres had 
a single or three or more nuclei. Only 29.9% (110/368) of all 
nuclei were uniformly haploid or diploid for the chromo-somes 
tested; the remaining nuclei were chaotic, aneuploid 
or polyploid. There were more uniformly diploid than uni-formly 
haploid nuclei (22.0% versus 7.9%, P = 0.05) and the 
most common form of abnormality was chaotic chromo-somal 
complement (39.9%, 147/368). The aneuploidy status 
of all chromosomes tested in two or more nuclei was iden-tical 
in 36.5% (69/189) of blastomeres, but different in 
the remaining 63.5%, suggesting that the unequal segrega-tion 
of chromosomes into multiple nuclei occurred in the 
majority of MN blastomeres. 
Valid test results were obtained in 22 of 24 MN blasto-meres 
tested for SGD. Two blastomeres were monosomic 
and the rest were diploid for the chromosomes tested. 
Among the diploid blastomeres, eight were affected, three 
were carriers and nine were unaffected by the SGD tested 
for, as determined by PCR-based assays. These results sug-gest 
that multinucleation probably does not compromise 
efficiency of the single-cell PCR used in the diagnosis of 
SGD. 
Transfer of embryos that had MN blastomeres subjected 
to genetic analysis resulted in three healthy deliveries. Only 
embryos that had genetically normal MN blastomeres were 
transferred in six cycles (four PGS, one translocation and 
one SGD) resulting in the delivery of a healthy baby in a 
reciprocal translocation and a second healthy baby in an 
SGD cycle. In the case of the reciprocal translocation cycle 
involving a patient with karyotype 46,XY,t(1;7)(p36.1; 
q11.23), 11 embryos were biopsied but nuclei were not 
found in two blastomeres. A single embryo containing a
Multinucleation in human embryos 383 
Table 1 Clinical details of the multinucleated cycles. 
Characteristic PGS Translocation SGD Total 
Patients 91 20 15 126 
Maternal age±SD (years) 37.4 ± 4.9 33.6 ± 3.8 31.6 ± 2.6 36.1 ± 5.0 
Multinucleated cycles 112 26 19 157 
Retrieved oocytes (per cycle) 2045 (18.3) 444 (17.1) 276 (14.5) 2765 (17.6) 
Embryos normally fertilized 1337 275 162 1774 
Embryos biopsied 1211 254 151 1616 
Blastomeres with nuclei (% of biopsied embryos) 1130 (93.3) 249 (98.0) 144 (95.4) 1523 (94.2) 
Blastomeres with valid test results 
(% of blastomeres with nuclei) 
1068 (94.5) 244 (98.0) 142 (98.6) 1454 (95.5) 
Blastomeres free of the genetic abnormality 
tested (% of blastomeres with valid test results) 
355 (33.2) 65 (26.6) 66 (46.5)a 486 (33.4) 
Embryos transferred (per cycle) 269 (2.4) 40 (1.5) 23 (1.2) 332 (2.1) 
Cycles with at least one sac 39 10 6 55 
Clinical pregnancy rate, % (cycles with at least 
one sac/total number of cycles) 
34.8 38.5 31.6 35.0 
Clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, % 36.8 43.5 37.5 37.9 
Implantation rate, % (total sacs/total 
embryos transferred) 
21.6 30.0 34.8 23.5 
Values are n unless otherwise stated. 
PGS = preimplantation genetic screening; SGD = single-gene defects. 
aThese blastomeres were either free of the SGD tested or had low risk of carrying it. Blastomeres carrier or free of the SGD tested but without 
matching HLA are also included. 
Table 2 Chromosomal complement in nuclei obtained from multinucleated blastomeres. 
Variable No. of nuclei found in each 
blastomere after spreading and 
FISH for 2 or 3 chromosomes 
1 2 3 1 2 3 
Blastomeres 4 32 2 18 124 9 189 
Nuclei 4 64 6 18 248 28 368 
x xxxx 
Nuclei with each 
blastomere with two nuclei each with diploid sets of all 
chromosomes tested was transferred on day 5 post insemi-nation. 
One sac and one fetal heart were detected. A girl 
balanced for the translocation, determined by amniocente-sis, 
was delivered. 
In the SGD testing carried out for the exclusion of Hun-tington’s 
disease (Jasper et al., 2006) in a 33-year-old 
female patient with four previous failed IVF and SGD cycles, 
there were six embryos available for biopsy. Nuclei were 
seen in only three of these six embryos. Two embryos had 
low and one had high risk for carrying the disease allele. 
No. of nuclei found in each 
blastomere after spreading and 
FISH for 5 chromosomes 
Total 
An embryo that had an MN blastomere carrying the low-risk 
allele identified using five linked STR markers was trans-ferred 
on day 5 at the blastocyst stage and a single healthy 
delivery was achieved. 
In 14 PGD cycles, biopsied embryos containing MN and 
mononucleated blastomeres free of the genetic abnormali-ties 
tested were transferred together, but only one delivery 
originating from a MN embryo was achieved. A patient with 
Robertsonian translocation 45,XY,der(13;21)(q10;q10) had 
12 COC collected. Nine embryos were available for biopsy, 
four of which were diploid and transferred. Three of the 
chromosomal complement 
xxx 
Uniformly diploid 2 22 – 3 50 4 81 
Diploid abnormal – 1 – 6 80 2 89 
Uniformly haploid 1 7 3 3 12 3 29 
Haploid abnormal – 2 – – 9 2 13 
Polyploid – – – – 9 – 9 
Chaotic 1 32 3 6 88 17 147 
Values are n. 
Diploid abnormal = nuclei diploid for all except one or two chromosomes; haploid abnormal = nuclei haploid for all 
except one or two chromosomes.
384 A Yilmaz et al. 
four blastomeres removed from these four embryos were 
mononucleated and carried two X chromosomes. Conclusive 
microscopic evidence showed that the blastomere carrying 
the X and Y chromosomes biopsied from the fourth embryo 
was clearly binucleated but one of the nuclei was not found 
after spreading. The analysed nucleus was diploid for all 
chromosomes tested. A girl and a boy were delivered, indi-cating 
that one of the deliveries originated from the embryo 
with the MN blastomere carrying the X and Y chromosomes. 
Six more pregnancies were achieved in these 14 cycles but it 
was not possible to determine whether the deliveries origi-nated 
from MN or mononucleated embryos based on the 
information obtained from the sex chromosomes. 
Each embryo contained a mean of 6.4 blastomeres 
before biopsy on day 3. Two blastomeres were removed 
from 42 embryos. Both cells were mononucleated in 21 of 
these 42 embryos whereas one cell was mononucleated 
and the other was MN in 19 embryos. Both cells were MN 
in only two of these embryos. Interestingly, in one of the 
PGD cycles, eight of the 13 embryos biopsied had MN blasto-meres. 
The 32-year-old patient, a carrier of muscular dys-trophy, 
had a large number of COC (n = 27) collected in 
that cycle. 
Fifty-three of embryos derived from 189 MN blastomeres 
(28.0%) were available for reanalysis on days 4 or 5 post 
insemination. Twenty-four (45.3%) of these reanalysed 
embryos were chaotic, 11 (20.8%) were diploid, 11 (20.8%) 
were mosaic and seven (13.2%) were aneuploid or polyploid. 
Analysis of chromosomal complement in nine reanalysed 
embryos that had MN blastomeres consisting of two chromo-somally 
identical nuclei on day 3 post insemination showed 
that six of these embryos were mosaic or diploid and thus, 
had the potential for implantation if transferred. The 
remaining three of these nine embryos were chaotic, poly-ploidy 
or mixoploid. On the other hand, 12 of 16 reanalysed 
embryos with blastomeres consisting of two chaotic nuclei 
on day 3 were chaotic or aneuploid on days 4 or 5 post 
insemination. 
Analysis of aneuploidy rates for chromosomes 13, 16, 18 
and 21 in MN and sibling embryos showed 12.6–18.1% higher 
monosomy (P  0.03) and 12.5–18.1% lower disomy 
(P  0.02) in MN than sibling embryos (Supplementary 
Table 1, available online) except for the difference in 
disomy rates for chromosome 16 which did not reach statis-tical 
significance (12.5% lower in MN embryos). In the anal-ysis 
of chromosome 22, MN embryos showed a trend towards 
higher monosomy and lower disomy than sibling embryos, 
although the differences were smaller and statistically non-significant 
(i.e. 8.3% higher monosomy and 8.7% lower 
disomy in MN embryos compared with siblings). Percentage 
trisomy for all chromosomes was similar between MN and 
sibling embryos. 
Discussion 
Multinucleation is one of the most common nuclear abnor-malities 
seen in developing human embryos (Agerholm 
et al., 2008; Meriano et al., 2004) and may complicate the 
genetic diagnosis in PGD and PGS cycles. Each nucleus 
may consist of a different chromosomal complement and 
it is conceivable that the different genetic contribution by 
each nucleus may compromise the PCR efficiency in SGD 
testing. 
This study analysed data obtained in 380 PGD or PGS 
cycles to investigate the nature, frequency and clinical rel-evance 
of multinucleation. Overall, 6.1% of all embryos 
screened were MN. At least one MN embryo was found in 
41.3% of all PGD or PGS cycles included. Number of COC col-lected 
per cycle (P  0.01), but not maternal age, was asso-ciated 
with multinucleation. Similar results on age (Van 
Royen et al., 2003) and number of COC collected per cycle 
(Jackson et al., 1998) have been reported previously, 
except that Moriwaki et al. (2004) reported higher rates of 
multinucleation in embryos obtained from women with 
advanced maternal age. In the current study, patients with 
20 or more COC produced significantly more MN embryos 
than those who produced 10 or less (51.9% versus 24.3%, 
P  0.01). 
Two blastomeres were biopsied from 42 embryos. Both 
blastomeres were mononucleated in 50.0% of these 
embryos. In 45.2% of embryos, only one blastomere, and 
in 4.8% of embryos both blastomeres, were MN, suggesting 
that most of the remaining cells after removal of two blas-tomeres 
in MN embryos were probably mononucleated. 
Analysis of chromosomal complement in MN blastomeres 
is shown in Table 2. Of all nuclei, 22.0% (81/368) were uni-formly 
diploid and 7.9% (29/368) were uniformly haploid for 
the chromosomes tested. The remaining nuclei were cha-otic, 
aneuploid or polyploid. These results suggest that 
while some nuclei in MN blastomeres are diploid and may 
be a product of possible failures in cytokinesis, a small 
portion of them are haploid and may be produced by 
premature karyokinesis. These results are not in direct 
agreement with those of Xanthopoulou et al. (2011), who 
reported a higher percentage overall of diploidy rather than 
tetraploidy in MN blastomeres. The reason for this 
discrepancy warrants further investigation but could be 
due to differences in sample size or the criteria used for 
classification of the embryos in the two studies. The 
current results agree with those of Kligman et al. (1996), 
who reported that the majority of MN embryos were 
chromosomally abnormal. 
Successful test results were obtained in 22 of 24 MN blas-tomeres 
tested for SGD, indicating that multinucleation 
probably did not have any adverse effects on the perfor-mance 
of the molecular techniques used in the diagnosis 
of SGD. Nine of these 22 blastomeres were diploid and 
unaffected by the SGD screened. The remaining 13 blasto-meres 
were affected (n = 8), carrier (n = 3) or monosomic 
(n = 2). On days 4 or 5, 10 embryos that had MN blastomeres 
tested for SGD were arrested or dead and 11 reached early 
or hatching blastocyst stage. No data were available on the 
developmental stages of the remaining three embryos. 
Although multinucleation has long been considered as a 
nuclear abnormality (Sathananthan et al., 1990) and trans-fer 
of MN embryos has generally been avoided (Girardet 
et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2007), some authors transferred 
MN embryos diagnosed solely based on light microscopy 
(Balakier and Cadesky, 1997). Transfer of MN embryos diag-nosed 
based on fixation and staining of nuclei has also been 
reported (Ambroggio et al., 2011; Xanthopoulou et al., 
2011) although no pregnancy was established in those 
studies. The current results show that transfer of embryos
Multinucleation in human embryos 385 
with MN blastomeres that are diploid and free of the genetic 
abnormalities tested in PGD cycles may result in apparently 
healthy births. Gestation length in MN cycles with births in 
this study ranged from 39 to 41 weeks and birthweight 
ranged from 2.3 to 3.2 kg. No abnormalities were reported 
during these pregnancies or deliveries. 
Comparison of aneuploidy rates for chromosomes other 
than 22 in blastomeres removed from MN and sibling 
embryos showed 12.6–18.1% higher monosomy and 
12.5–18.1% lower disomy in MN blastomeres (Supplemental 
Table 1). These results suggest that a copy of these chromo-somes 
may have been lost in some MN blastomeres. The 
reason for this loss of chromosomes warrants further inves-tigation 
but could be a consequence of cellular defects 
(Cimini and Degrassi, 2005) or anaphase lag seen in early 
human embryos (Coonen et al., 2004). It is known that 
monosomy is more frequent than trisomy in IVF embryos 
(Munne et al., 2004) and may contribute to early develop-mental 
arrest (Rubio et al., 2007). However, as far as is 
known, there are no published detailed comparison of 
chromosome-specific aneuploidy rates in MN and sibling 
embryos. 
The limitations of FISH performed for detection of a lim-ited 
number of chromosomes in a single cell removed from 
the developing embryo should be taken into consideration 
when interpreting these results. Previous studies have 
shown that the efficiency of the probes used in FISH and 
the biological factors such as mosaicism may decrease the 
accuracy of the results (Magli et al., 2007). However, the 
FISH protocols have been well optimized in this laboratory 
(Ao et al., 2006; Bielanska et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010; 
Figure 1) and the hybridization efficiency of the commer-cial 
FISH probes exceeds 95% (Wilton et al., 2009). Recently, 
large studies involving chromosome analysis in early human 
embryos using FISH in single blastomeres have been pub-lished 
(Ko et al., 2010; Lim et al., 2008), indicating that 
FISH is currently considered as one of the reliable methods 
for chromosome analysis. FISH will probably remain as one 
of the best methods to analyse chromosomal complement 
in MN embryos in future studies because the new 
platforms such as single-nucleotide polymorphism micro-arrays 
and array-based comparative genomic hybridization 
(Gutierrez-Mateo et al., 2011; Treff et al., 2011) do not 
involve spreading of blastomeres, and thus, cannot be used 
to determine chromosomal complement in individual 
nuclei. A second limitation of this study is that only one 
nucleus was found after spreading 22 blastomeres obtained 
from patients referred for PGS and translocation testing, 
although two or more nuclei were clearly visible under the 
microscope before spreading. However, this limitation of 
the study should not have a large impact on the results 
because only 22 of 368 nuclei (6.0%) obtained from blasto-meres 
diagnosed as MN under the microscope were found 
to lack any sibling(s) after spreading. 
In summary, these results suggest that the majority of 
MN blastomeres are chromosomally abnormal, and thus, 
embryos with these blastomeres should not be given priority 
for transfer when monoucleated embryos are available. 
However, when genetic analysis is performed, MN embryos 
that are free of the genetic abnormalities tested may be 
Figure 1 Representative micrographs of multinucleated blastomeres subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. 
Multiple nuclei in the same blastomere seen under the light (A) and inverted (B) microscope before FISH analysis. (C) FISH using 
probes for chromosomes 13 (red), 16 (aqua), 18 (blue), 21 (green) and 22 (gold) in a multinucleated blastomere showed trisomy 21 
and monosomy 22 in both nuclei (NB: the gold signal for chromosome 22 in the left nucleus appears light yellow). (D) Two nuclei with 
identical chromosomal complement obtained from a multinucleated blastomere with nullisomy for chromosome 13 and monosomy 
for chromosomes 16, 18, 21 and 22 in each nucleus. Magnification = ·400 (A), ·200 (B) and ·1000 (C and D). (For interpretation of the 
references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
386 A Yilmaz et al. 
considered normal and transferred if each nucleus in the 
biopsied blastomere(s) consists of diploid sets of all chromo-somes 
tested. Healthy births are possible after transfer of 
MN embryos that meet these criteria. Multinucleation, as 
diagnosed using light microscopy, does not seem to compro-mise 
efficiency of PCR and other molecular techniques used 
in the testing for SGD. As far as is known, this is the first 
report of healthy births following transfer of embryos that 
had MN blastomeres subjected to genetic analysis for trans-location 
or SGD and may help clinicians and embryologists in 
selection of embryos for transfer in future PGD cycles 
involving MN embryos. 
Acknowledgements 
The authors wish to thank all of the physicians, nurses and 
embryologists at the MUHC Reproductive Centre for provid-ing 
excellent patient care and resources for conducting 
medical research. 
Appendix A. Supplementary data 
Supplementary data associated with this article can be 
found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 
j.rbmo.2013.11.003. 
References 
Agerholm, I.E., Hnida, C., Cru¨ger, D.G., Berg, C., Bruun-Petersen, 
G., Kolvraa, S., Ziebe, S., 2008. Nuclei size in relation to nuclear 
status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four 
cells embryos. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 25, 95–102. 
Ambroggio, J., Gindoff, P.R., Dayal, M.B., Khaldi, R., Peak, D., 
Frankfurter, D., Dubey, A.K., 2011. Multinucleation of a sibling 
blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in 
IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil. Steril. 96, 
856–859. 
Ao, A., Jin, S., Rao, D., Son, W.Y., Chian, R.C., Tan, S.L., 2006. 
First successful pregnancy outcome after preimplantation 
genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in embryos generated 
from natural-cycle in vitro fertilization combined with an in vitro 
maturation procedure. Fertil. Steril. 85, e9–11. 
Balakier, H., Cadesky, K., 1997. The frequency and developmental 
capability of human embryos containing multinucleated blasto-meres. 
Hum. Reprod. 12, 800–804. 
Bielanska, M., Jin, S., Bernier, M., Tan, S.L., Ao, A., 2005. 
Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the 
blastocyst stage. Fertil. Steril. 84, 336–342. 
Chatzimeletiou, K., Morrison, E.E., Prapas, N., Prapas, Y., Handy-side, 
A.H., 2005. Spindle abnormalities in normally developing 
and arrested human preimplantation embryos in vitro identified 
by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Hum. Reprod. 20, 
672–682. 
Cimini, D., Degrassi, F., 2005. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad 
connections. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 442–451. 
Coonen, E., Derhaag, J.G., Dumoulin, J.C., van Wissen, L.C., Bras, 
M., Janssen, M., Evers, J.L., Geraedts, J.P., 2004. Anaphase 
lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human 
preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod. 19, 316–324. 
De La Fuente, R., King, W.A., 1998. Developmental consequences of 
karyokinesis without cytokinesis during the first mitotic cell 
cycle of bovine parthenotes. Biol. Reprod. 58, 952–962. 
Dean, N.L., Loredo-Osti, J.C., Fujiwara, T.M., Morgan, K., Tan, 
S.L., Naumova, A.K., Ao, A., 2006. Transmission ratio distortion 
in the myotonic dystrophy locus in human preimplantation 
embryos. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 299–306. 
Girardet, A., Fernandez, C., Claustres, M., 2009. Rapid and 
powerful decaplex and dodecaplex PGD protocols for Duchenne 
muscular dystrophy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 19, 830–837. 
Gutierrez-Mateo, C., Colls, P., Sanchez-Garcı´a, J., Escudero, T., 
Prates, R., Ketterson, K., Wells, D., Munne, S., 2011. Validation 
of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for compre-hensive 
chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil. Steril. 95, 
953–958. 
Hardy, K., Winston, R.M., Handyside, A.H., 1993. Binucleate 
blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro: failure 
of cytokinesis during early cleavage. J. Reprod. Fertil. 98, 
549–558. 
Harper, J.C., Sengupta, S.B., 2012. Preimplantation genetic diag-nosis: 
state of the ART 2011. Hum. Genet. 131, 175–186. 
Jackson, K.V., Ginsburg, E.S., Hornstein, M.D., Rein, M.S., Clarke, 
R.N., 1998. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is 
associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and 
lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertiliza-tion- 
embryo transfer cycles. Fertil. Steril. 70, 60–66. 
Jasper, M.J., Hu, D.G., Liebelt, J., Sherrin, D., Watson, R., 
Tremellen, K.P., Hussey, N.D., 2006. Singleton births after 
routine preimplantation genetic diagnosis using exclusion testing 
(D4S43 and D4S126) for Huntington’s disease. Fertil. Steril. 85, 
597–602. 
Kligman, I., Benadiva, C., Alikani, M., Munne, S., 1996. The 
presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is 
correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum. Reprod. 11, 
1492–1498. 
Ko, D.S., Cho, J.W., Park, S.Y., Kim, J.Y., Koong, M.K., Song, I.O., 
Kang, I.S., Lim, C.K., 2010. Clinical outcomes of preimplantation 
genetic diagnosis (PGD) and analysis of meiotic segregation 
modes in reciprocal translocation carriers. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 
152A, 1428–1433. 
Lim, C.K., Cho, J.W., Song, I.O., Kang, I.S., Yoon, Y.D., Jun, J.H., 
2008. Estimation of chromosomal imbalances in preimplantation 
embryos from preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles of 
reciprocal translocations with or without acrocentric chromo-somes. 
Fertil. Steril. 90, 2144–2151. 
Magli, M.C., Gianaroli, L., Ferraretti, A.P., Lappi, M., Ruberti, A., 
Farfalli, V., 2007. Embryo morphology and development are 
dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil. Steril. 87, 
534–541. 
Meriano, J., Clark, C., Cadesky, K., Laskin, C.A., 2004. Binucleated 
and micronucleated blastomeres in embryos derived from 
human assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online 9, 
511–520. 
Moriwaki, T., Suganuma, N., Hayakawa, M., Hibi, H., Katsumata, 
Y., Oguchi, H., Furuhashi, M., 2004. Embryo evaluation by 
analysing blastomere nuclei. Hum. Reprod. 19, 152–156. 
Munne, S., 2003. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and human 
implantation – a review. Placenta 24, S70–76. 
Munne, S., Bahce, M., Sandalinas, M., Escudero, T., Marquez, C., 
Velilla, E., Colls, P., Oter, M., Alikani, M., Cohen, J., 2004. 
Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and 
survival to first trimester. Reprod. Biomed. Online 8, 81–90. 
Rubio, C., Rodrigo, L., Mercader, A., Mateu, E., Buendia, P., 
Pehlivan, T., Viloria, T., de los Santos, M.J., Simo´n, C., Remohi, 
J., Pellicer, A., 2007. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on 
preimplantation embryo development. Prenat. Diagn. 27, 
748–756. 
Sathananthan, H., Bongso, A., Ng, S.C., Ho, J., Mok, H., Ratnam, S., 
1990. Ultrastructure of preimplantation human embryos co-cul-tured 
with human ampullary cells. Hum. Reprod. 5, 309–318. 
Scott, L., Finn, A., O’Leary, T., McLellan, S., Hill, J., 2007. 
Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that 
correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and
Multinucleation in human embryos 387 
applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod. 22, 
230–240. 
Staessen, C., Van Steirteghem, A., 1998. The genetic constitution 
of multinuclear blastomeres and their derivative daughter 
blastomeres. Hum. Reprod. 13, 1625–1631. 
Treff, N.R., Northrop, L.E., Kasabwala, K., Su, J., Levy, B., Scott 
Jr., R.T., 2011. Single nucleotide polymorphism micro-array- 
based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy 
and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human 
embryos. Fertil. Steril. 95, 1606–1612. 
Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., Vercruyssen, M., De Neubourg, D., 
Valkenburg, M., Ryckaert, G., Gerris, J., 2003. Multinucleation 
in cleavage stage embryos. Hum. Reprod. 18, 1062–1069. 
Wang, W.H., Abeydeera, L.R., Prather, R.S., Day, B.N., 2000. 
Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an 
important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early 
embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1177–1183. 
Wilton, L., Thornhill, A., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Sermon, K.D., 
Harper, J.C., 2009. The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse 
outcomes in PGD. Hum. Reprod. 24, 1221–1228. 
Xanthopoulou, L., Delhanty, J.D., Mania, A., Mamas, T., Serhal, P., 
Sengupta, S.B., Mantzouratou, A., 2011. The nature and origin of 
binucleate cells in human preimplantation embryos: relevance 
to placental mesenchymal dysplasia. Reprod. Biomed. Online 22, 
362–370. 
Zhang, X.Y., Ata, B., Son, W.Y., Buckett, W.M., Tan, S.L., Ao, A., 
2010. Chromosome abnormality rates in human embryos 
obtained from in-vitro maturation and IVF treatment cycles. 
Reprod. Biomed. Online 21, 552–559. 
Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial 
conflicts of interest. 
Received 18 November 2012; refereed 16 October 2013; accepted 5 
November 2013.

More Related Content

What's hot

Comprehensive chromosome screeningccs
Comprehensive chromosome screeningccsComprehensive chromosome screeningccs
Comprehensive chromosome screeningccst7260678
 
Profiling the gene signature
Profiling the gene signatureProfiling the gene signature
Profiling the gene signaturet7260678
 
Pre genetic screen (1)pgs
Pre genetic screen (1)pgsPre genetic screen (1)pgs
Pre genetic screen (1)pgs鋒博 蔡
 
Preimplantation genetic screening
Preimplantation genetic screeningPreimplantation genetic screening
Preimplantation genetic screeningTevfik Yoldemir
 
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...Yu Liang
 
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)Andreu Paytuví
 
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05smunne
 
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai 2014
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai  2014PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai  2014
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai 2014Metwalley Metwalley
 
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...鋒博 蔡
 

What's hot (13)

Comprehensive chromosome screeningccs
Comprehensive chromosome screeningccsComprehensive chromosome screeningccs
Comprehensive chromosome screeningccs
 
pgs
pgs  pgs
pgs
 
Profiling the gene signature
Profiling the gene signatureProfiling the gene signature
Profiling the gene signature
 
Pre genetic screen (1)pgs
Pre genetic screen (1)pgsPre genetic screen (1)pgs
Pre genetic screen (1)pgs
 
Preimplantation genetic screening
Preimplantation genetic screeningPreimplantation genetic screening
Preimplantation genetic screening
 
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...
Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtype...
 
35170
3517035170
35170
 
aCGH in PGD/PGS
aCGH in PGD/PGSaCGH in PGD/PGS
aCGH in PGD/PGS
 
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
Application of NGS technologies to Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
 
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05
Munne Array Cgh Update 2010 05
 
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai 2014
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai  2014PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai  2014
PGT Applications and Biopsy procedures - COOK Media workshop- Dubai 2014
 
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...
Introduction: Preimplantation genetic screening is alive and very well. Meldr...
 
PGS-NGS 360°™
PGS-NGS 360°™PGS-NGS 360°™
PGS-NGS 360°™
 

Viewers also liked

Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)
Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)
Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)鋒博 蔡
 
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02鋒博 蔡
 
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11鋒博 蔡
 
Embryotransferincattle (3)
Embryotransferincattle (3)Embryotransferincattle (3)
Embryotransferincattle (3)鋒博 蔡
 
Dukengineer2012
Dukengineer2012Dukengineer2012
Dukengineer2012鋒博 蔡
 
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010鋒博 蔡
 
Endometrialimplantationwindow
EndometrialimplantationwindowEndometrialimplantationwindow
Endometrialimplantationwindow鋒博 蔡
 
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformatics
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformaticsFetal quant cuhk bioinformatics
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformatics鋒博 蔡
 
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...鋒博 蔡
 
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Michele evans (1)
Michele evans (1)Michele evans (1)
Michele evans (1)鋒博 蔡
 
pgs munne Pre genetic screen (1)
pgs   munne  Pre genetic screen (1)pgs   munne  Pre genetic screen (1)
pgs munne Pre genetic screen (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Munne pgs overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...
Munne    pgs           overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...Munne    pgs           overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...
Munne pgs overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...鋒博 蔡
 
pgs Munne arraycghupdate
pgs  Munne   arraycghupdatepgs  Munne   arraycghupdate
pgs Munne arraycghupdate鋒博 蔡
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)
Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)
Dr. irene souter pgd stickler foundation (2)
 
Ecas1 1410
Ecas1 1410Ecas1 1410
Ecas1 1410
 
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02
Munneoverviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp02
 
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis_oct_11
 
Embryotransferincattle (3)
Embryotransferincattle (3)Embryotransferincattle (3)
Embryotransferincattle (3)
 
Dukengineer2012
Dukengineer2012Dukengineer2012
Dukengineer2012
 
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010
 
Otago039404
Otago039404Otago039404
Otago039404
 
Endometrialimplantationwindow
EndometrialimplantationwindowEndometrialimplantationwindow
Endometrialimplantationwindow
 
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformatics
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformaticsFetal quant cuhk bioinformatics
Fetal quant cuhk bioinformatics
 
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...
Clinical manaement of in vitrofertilizatonwithpreimplantation geneticdiagnosi...
 
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)
Munneasrm2009abstracto6 12564080005062-phpapp03 (1)
 
Michele evans (1)
Michele evans (1)Michele evans (1)
Michele evans (1)
 
Mu
MuMu
Mu
 
pgs munne Pre genetic screen (1)
pgs   munne  Pre genetic screen (1)pgs   munne  Pre genetic screen (1)
pgs munne Pre genetic screen (1)
 
Munne pgs overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...
Munne    pgs           overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...Munne    pgs           overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...
Munne pgs overviewpgdchina200911withsound 12588814598727-phpapp0...
 
pgs Munne arraycghupdate
pgs  Munne   arraycghupdatepgs  Munne   arraycghupdate
pgs Munne arraycghupdate
 

Similar to 1 s2.0-s1472648313005798-main

Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26
Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26
Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26鋒博 蔡
 
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidence
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidenceAdjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidence
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidenceAboubakr Elnashar
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     pptPreimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt鋒博 蔡
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     pptPreimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt鋒博 蔡
 
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...鋒博 蔡
 
Ecr pubmed version
Ecr pubmed versionEcr pubmed version
Ecr pubmed version鋒博 蔡
 
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)鋒博 蔡
 
qpcr 1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
qpcr           1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)qpcr           1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
qpcr 1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0鋒博 蔡
 
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020Võ Tá Sơn
 
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main鋒博 蔡
 
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal AbnormalitiesPractice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal AbnormalitiesVõ Tá Sơn
 
Pg dreview
Pg dreviewPg dreview
Pg dreviewt7260678
 
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad TECNALIA Research & Innovation
 
Snp microarray
Snp microarraySnp microarray
Snp microarrayt7260678
 

Similar to 1 s2.0-s1472648313005798-main (20)

Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26
Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26
Mol. hum. reprod. 2014-fragouli-117-26
 
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidence
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidenceAdjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidence
Adjuncts in IVF laboratory: Current evidence
 
Cgh
CghCgh
Cgh
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     pptPreimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
 
35170
3517035170
35170
 
35170
3517035170
35170
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     pptPreimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt
 
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...
The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for ...
 
Ecr pubmed version
Ecr pubmed versionEcr pubmed version
Ecr pubmed version
 
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
 
qpcr 1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
qpcr           1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)qpcr           1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
qpcr 1 s2.0-s0015028213005499-main (1)
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs00439 013-1309-0
 
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020
ACOG screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities 2020
 
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214020809-main
 
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal AbnormalitiesPractice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
Practice Bulletin #226, Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
 
Pg dreview
Pg dreviewPg dreview
Pg dreview
 
Pg dreview
Pg dreviewPg dreview
Pg dreview
 
Pg dreview
Pg dreviewPg dreview
Pg dreview
 
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad
I Jornada Actualización en Genética Reproductiva y Fertilidad
 
Snp microarray
Snp microarraySnp microarray
Snp microarray
 

More from 鋒博 蔡

Fresh or frozen embryos – which are better
Fresh or frozen embryos – which are betterFresh or frozen embryos – which are better
Fresh or frozen embryos – which are better鋒博 蔡
 
Fetal fraction nipt pnd
Fetal fraction nipt pndFetal fraction nipt pnd
Fetal fraction nipt pnd鋒博 蔡
 
Gb 2011-12-9-228
Gb 2011-12-9-228Gb 2011-12-9-228
Gb 2011-12-9-228鋒博 蔡
 
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pndMat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd鋒博 蔡
 
Nihms379831 stephen quake
Nihms379831 stephen quakeNihms379831 stephen quake
Nihms379831 stephen quake鋒博 蔡
 
Twin zygosity nipt
Twin zygosity niptTwin zygosity nipt
Twin zygosity nipt鋒博 蔡
 
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main鋒博 蔡
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4鋒博 蔡
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3鋒博 蔡
 
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main鋒博 蔡
 
New developments in reproductive medicine
New developments in reproductive medicineNew developments in reproductive medicine
New developments in reproductive medicine鋒博 蔡
 
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)New developments in reproductive medicine (1)
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02鋒博 蔡
 
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)鋒博 蔡
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt2
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt2Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt2
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt2鋒博 蔡
 

More from 鋒博 蔡 (20)

Shapiro
ShapiroShapiro
Shapiro
 
Fresh or frozen embryos – which are better
Fresh or frozen embryos – which are betterFresh or frozen embryos – which are better
Fresh or frozen embryos – which are better
 
Fetal fraction nipt pnd
Fetal fraction nipt pndFetal fraction nipt pnd
Fetal fraction nipt pnd
 
Gb 2011-12-9-228
Gb 2011-12-9-228Gb 2011-12-9-228
Gb 2011-12-9-228
 
Pone.0034901
Pone.0034901Pone.0034901
Pone.0034901
 
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pndMat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd
Mat weight ga fetal frac nipt pnd
 
Snp nipt pnd
Snp nipt pndSnp nipt pnd
Snp nipt pnd
 
Nihms379831 stephen quake
Nihms379831 stephen quakeNihms379831 stephen quake
Nihms379831 stephen quake
 
Twin zygosity nipt
Twin zygosity niptTwin zygosity nipt
Twin zygosity nipt
 
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main
1 s2.0-s0015028213027441-main
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0355-4 (1)
 
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3
Art%3 a10.1007%2fs10815 014-0230-3
 
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main
1 s2.0-s0015028214018603-main
 
New developments in reproductive medicine
New developments in reproductive medicineNew developments in reproductive medicine
New developments in reproductive medicine
 
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)New developments in reproductive medicine (1)
New developments in reproductive medicine (1)
 
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02
 
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)
Pgd 121115232648-phpapp02 (1)
 
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)
Presentation instabul +videos 1 6-2010 (1)
 
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt2
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt2Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs)  current     ppt2
Preimplantation genetic screening (pgs) current ppt2
 

1 s2.0-s1472648313005798-main

  • 1. Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2014) 28, 380– 387 www.sciencedirect.com www.rbmonline.com ARTICLE Chromosomal complement and clinical relevance of multinucleated embryos in PGD and PGS cycles Ahmet Yilmaz a, Li Zhang a, Xiao Yun Zhang a, Weon-Young Son a, Hananel Holzer a,b, Asangla Ao a,b,c,* a MUHC Reproductive Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; c Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada * Corresponding author. E-mail address: asangla.ao@muhc.mcgill.ca (A Ao). Dr. Ahmet Yilmaz completed his postdoctoral training at the McGill University, Department of Human Genetics working on inherited cancer syndromes and development of assays to test protein function in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae. He was a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research/MCETC postdoctoral fellowship award. He is currently a research associate at the MUHC-RC specializing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human embryos. His research interests include detection of aneuploidy, mosaicism and chromosome translocations in human embryos. Abstract The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence and clinical implications of multinucleation in blastomeres biopsied from cleavage-stage embryos obtained from patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidies or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for translocations or single-gene defects (SGD). A total of 3515 embryos were obtained from 306 couples in 380 PGD or PGS cycles. Incidence of multinucleation, chromosomal complement in multinucle-ated (MN) and sibling embryos and the characteristics of MN embryos resulting in healthy births were investigated. Of all cycles, 41.3% involved at least one MN embryo. There were more uniformly diploid than uniformly haploid nuclei (22.0% versus 7.9%, P < 0.01). The most common form of abnormality was chaotic chromosomal complement (39.9%, 147/368). Transfer of embryos that had MN blastomeres free of the genetic abnormalities tested resulted in three healthy deliveries. It is concluded that, although the majority of MN blastomeres are chromosomally abnormal, healthy births are possible after transfer of embryos containing these blastomeres subjected to genetic analysis. As far as is known, this is the first report of healthy births after transfer of embryos with MN blastomeres tested for translocations or SGD in PGD cycles. RBMOnline Crown copyright ª 2013, Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: FISH, human embryos, multinucleation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic screening, translocations 1472-6483/$ - see front matter Crown copyright ª 2013, Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.003
  • 2. Multinucleation in human embryos 381 Introduction Genetic analysis for selection of genetically healthy embryos for transfer is an established treatment option offered to patients referred due to advanced maternal age, translocations or single-gene defects (SGD) (Harper and Sengupta, 2012; Munne, 2003). Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidies or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of SGD or translocations performed at the cleavage stages of embryonic development involves removal of blastomere(s) from the embryo. However, some of these removed blastomeres may contain more than one nuclei (i.e. bi- or multinucleated (MN)), compli-cating the genetic diagnosis because each nucleus may be haploid, diploid, aneuploid or chaotic (Xanthopoulou et al., 2011). Multinucleation is one of the most common nuclear abnormalities seen in human embryos (Hardy et al., 1993). Much research effort has been spent to try to explain how and why multinucleation occurs. Karyokinesis without cytokinesis (Hardy et al., 1993) that may result from defects in structure and/or function of the extra- or intra-cellular elements, culture reagents or conditions (De La Fuente and King, 1998; Chatzimeletiou et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2000) or suboptimal ovarian stimulation regimes (Van Royen et al., 2003) have been proposed as plausible explanations. However, the fate of MN human embryos is still subject to controversy in the literature. Some authors have suggested that multinucleation may represent a major pathway leading to chromosomal chaos and subsequent developmental arrest (Chatzimeletiou et al., 2005) whereas others have reported the development of embryos fully binucleated on day 2 post insemination into chromosomally normal diploid blastocysts (Staessen and Van Steirteghem, 1998). The current literature on chromosomal abnormality rates in MN embryos in PGD and PGS cycles is limited. Although chromosomal complement in MN embryos after fixation and staining of the nuclei (Xanthopoulou et al., 2011) as well as pregnancy after transfer of MN embryos not sub-jected to genetic analysis have been reported previously (Balakier and Cadesky, 1997), there are no reports of healthy births after the transfer of embryos with MN blasto-meres tested for translocations or SGD in PGD cycles. Consequently, it is currently unknown what type, if any, of chromosomal complement in MN blastomeres may be associated with healthy births. This may become an important issue in PGD cycles where only MN embryos are available for transfer. A thorough investigation of the frequency and clinical outcome of multinucleation in blastomeres sampled from preimplantation embryos may help not only embryologists and clinicians in identifying the type(s) of MN embryos that may result in healthy births but also basic researchers investigating cellular mechanisms leading to multinucle-ation and chromosome segregation in early human embryos. The aim of this study was to help to achieve both of these objectives by investigating frequency, type and clinical relevance of MN embryos in PGD and PGS cycles. Materials and methods Patient details This study retrospectively analyzed data to obtain the mul-tinucleation rate in 3515 cleavage-stage embryos obtained from 306 couples (219 PGS, 41 translocation and 46 SGD) who underwent 380 PGD or PGS cycles (267 PGS, 58 translocation and 55 SGD) at the McGill University Health Centre – Reproductive Centre (MUHC-RC) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The data were collected from March 1998 to November 2011. These projects were approved by the Royal Victoria Hospital – MUHC Office of Research Ethics (mosaicism: SUR-99-825, continuing review approved 20 December 2012; SGD: SUR-99-781, continuing review approved 30 March 2010). Definitions Blastomeres containing two or more nuclei or an embryo with at least one MN blastomere were considered MN. A cycle was defined as MN when at least one MN embryo was obtained. Diagnosis of multinucleation was based on micros-copy as well as spreading and staining of nuclei in 3120 embryos tested for translocation or screened for aneu-ploidy. Diagnosis of multinucleation was based on micro-scopic evidence obtained using a high-power inverted microscope in 395 embryos tested for SGD. Each blastomere was carefully examined and only those with clearly more than one nucleus were included in the analysis. Based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals, embryos were classified as ‘chaotic’ whenever more than two chro-mosomes were aneuploid or complex segregation patterns were observed. Blastomeres were classified as ‘uniformly haploid’ or ‘uniformly diploid’ when each nucleus consisted of one or two sets, respectively, of all chromosomes tested. Embryo quality was visually assessed and recorded on day 3 post insemination and again on the day of transfer. Clinical pregnancy rate was defined as the number of cycles with at least one gestational sac divided by the total number of cycles. Implantation rate was obtained by dividing the total number of gestational sacs obtained in all cycles by the total number of embryos transferred. Embryo biopsy, FISH and multiplex PCR Embryos were biopsied on day 3 post insemination in a drop of Ca2+ and Mg2+-free biopsy medium (Cook Canada) using an infrared diode laser in computer-controlled non-contact mode (Hamilton Thorn, MA, USA). A single blastomere was removed and spread on a glass slide using spreading buffer (0.1% Tween 20, 0.01 mol HCl; Zhang et al., 2010), except that two cells were removed from 42 embryos. Genetic analysis was performed using multicolour FISH for PGS and testing for translocations. FISH was performed in two or three rounds using probes specific for chromo-somes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in aneuploidy screening cases. Only signals from CEP probes were included in the analysis of reciprocal translocations to remove effects of translocations on aneuploidy rates.
  • 3. 382 A Yilmaz et al. All reagents were purchased from Sigma (Ontario, Canada) except that the FISH probes were purchased from Intermedico (Ontario, Canada), a Canadian distributor of Abbott Molecular products. Technical details of FISH can be found elsewhere (Bielanska et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010). Embryos that were donated for research and not suitable for transfer or freezing were also analysed using the same FISH probes used on day 3 post insemination. Sta-tistical analysis was performed using F-test for continuous and chi-squared test for categorical data with the signifi-cance level set at P = 0.05. For SGD testing, blastomeres were washed in PBS with bovine serum albumin and transferred into 5 ll alkaline lysis buffer (200 mmol KOH, 50 mmol dithiothreitol) in 0.2 ml PCR tubes. The genetic analysis was performed as described previously (Dean et al., 2006). Briefly, fluorescently labelled PCR primers were used to amplify the desired mutation(s) and the flanking linked short tandem repeat (STR) markers in nested multiplex PCR reactions. Amplification as well as the allelic dropout ratios (i.e. number of amplification fail-ures in one of the alleles of a heterozygous locus divided by the total number of amplified loci) was obtained using patients’ lymphocytes before each test. Molecular techniques such as restriction digestion, frag-ment analysis and mini sequencing were used to determine the disease status of each allele. Information obtained from the STR markers was used for haplotyping and pedigrees were constructed based on the inheritance patterns of the markers. Minisequencing and fragment analysis were per-formed using a ABI 3130 genetic analyser and GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). Results A total of 6086 cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) were col-lected, 3916 of which were fertilized normally. In PGS and translocation cases, multinucleation rates obtained by microscopy (6.1%, 189/3120) and spreading of nuclei (5.4%, 167/3120) were similar. The multinucleation rate in SGD cycles was 6.1% (24/395). Overall, 157 of 380 PGD cycles (41.3%) had at least one MN embryo (Table 1). The clinical pregnancy rates in couples with MN embryo(s) referred for PGS, PGD for translocation or PGD for SGD were 34.8%, 38.5% and 31.6%, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rates in non-MN cycles in these patients were 35.4%, 28.1% and 25.0%, respectively. None of these differences in clinical pregnancy rates between MN and non-MN cycles were statis-tically significant. The implantation rate in MN cycles was 21.6%, 30.0% and 34.8%, respectively, and the implantation rate in non-MN cycles was 22.5%, 23.1% and 26.1%, respec-tively. These differences in implantation rates between MN and non-MN cycles were not statistically significant. Multinucleation in an embryo did not appear to be asso-ciated with multinucleation in sibling embryos. In the majority of MN cycles, only one (68.2%) or two (27.1%) MN embryos were obtained; three or more MN embryos were collected in only 4.7% of cycles. Age of patients in MN (mean ± SD, 36.1 ± 5.0 years) and mononucleated (36.7 ± 4.5 years) cycles were similar (not statistically significant). Additionally, number of MN embryos obtained per cycle did not differ when patients were categorized into three groups based on their age (i.e. 35, 36–39 and 40 years). In order to identify possible associations between multinu-cleation rate and number of COC collected per cycle, MN embryos were categorized into the following four groups based on the number of COC collected per cycle: A (10 COC or less), B (11–15), C (16–20) and D (over 20 COC). Per-centage multinucleation in groups A, B, C and D was 24.3% (18/74), 39.3% (44/112), 35.8% (34/95) and 51.9% (42/81), respectively, indicating that rate of multinucleation was higher in cycles with larger number of COC collected (P 0.01). Of all cycles, 37.3% (69/185), 42.9% (42/98) and 45.4% (44/97) were MN in patients who had one, two and three or more total PGD or PGS cycles, respec-tively. MN embryos, in general, were of poor quality when graded subjectively. The chromosomal complement in nuclei with valid FISH results for at least two chromosomes in MN blastomeres is presented in Table 2. Day-3 FISH results were available in 368 nuclei obtained from 189 blastomeres in translocation and PGS cycles. Although conclusive microscopic evidence showed the presence of at least two nuclei in all of the 189 blastomeres included in this table, only one nucleus was found in 4 and 18 blastomeres when 2 or 3 probes and 5 probes, respectively, were used in FISH analysis. Nuclei were grouped based on the number of chromo-somes screened to determine possible changes in aneu-ploidy rates due to number of chromosomes analysed. The nuclei were then divided into three subcategories based on the number of nuclei found in each blastomere after spreading. The majority of MN blastomeres (82.5%) had only two nuclei after spreading. The remaining blastomeres had a single or three or more nuclei. Only 29.9% (110/368) of all nuclei were uniformly haploid or diploid for the chromo-somes tested; the remaining nuclei were chaotic, aneuploid or polyploid. There were more uniformly diploid than uni-formly haploid nuclei (22.0% versus 7.9%, P = 0.05) and the most common form of abnormality was chaotic chromo-somal complement (39.9%, 147/368). The aneuploidy status of all chromosomes tested in two or more nuclei was iden-tical in 36.5% (69/189) of blastomeres, but different in the remaining 63.5%, suggesting that the unequal segrega-tion of chromosomes into multiple nuclei occurred in the majority of MN blastomeres. Valid test results were obtained in 22 of 24 MN blasto-meres tested for SGD. Two blastomeres were monosomic and the rest were diploid for the chromosomes tested. Among the diploid blastomeres, eight were affected, three were carriers and nine were unaffected by the SGD tested for, as determined by PCR-based assays. These results sug-gest that multinucleation probably does not compromise efficiency of the single-cell PCR used in the diagnosis of SGD. Transfer of embryos that had MN blastomeres subjected to genetic analysis resulted in three healthy deliveries. Only embryos that had genetically normal MN blastomeres were transferred in six cycles (four PGS, one translocation and one SGD) resulting in the delivery of a healthy baby in a reciprocal translocation and a second healthy baby in an SGD cycle. In the case of the reciprocal translocation cycle involving a patient with karyotype 46,XY,t(1;7)(p36.1; q11.23), 11 embryos were biopsied but nuclei were not found in two blastomeres. A single embryo containing a
  • 4. Multinucleation in human embryos 383 Table 1 Clinical details of the multinucleated cycles. Characteristic PGS Translocation SGD Total Patients 91 20 15 126 Maternal age±SD (years) 37.4 ± 4.9 33.6 ± 3.8 31.6 ± 2.6 36.1 ± 5.0 Multinucleated cycles 112 26 19 157 Retrieved oocytes (per cycle) 2045 (18.3) 444 (17.1) 276 (14.5) 2765 (17.6) Embryos normally fertilized 1337 275 162 1774 Embryos biopsied 1211 254 151 1616 Blastomeres with nuclei (% of biopsied embryos) 1130 (93.3) 249 (98.0) 144 (95.4) 1523 (94.2) Blastomeres with valid test results (% of blastomeres with nuclei) 1068 (94.5) 244 (98.0) 142 (98.6) 1454 (95.5) Blastomeres free of the genetic abnormality tested (% of blastomeres with valid test results) 355 (33.2) 65 (26.6) 66 (46.5)a 486 (33.4) Embryos transferred (per cycle) 269 (2.4) 40 (1.5) 23 (1.2) 332 (2.1) Cycles with at least one sac 39 10 6 55 Clinical pregnancy rate, % (cycles with at least one sac/total number of cycles) 34.8 38.5 31.6 35.0 Clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, % 36.8 43.5 37.5 37.9 Implantation rate, % (total sacs/total embryos transferred) 21.6 30.0 34.8 23.5 Values are n unless otherwise stated. PGS = preimplantation genetic screening; SGD = single-gene defects. aThese blastomeres were either free of the SGD tested or had low risk of carrying it. Blastomeres carrier or free of the SGD tested but without matching HLA are also included. Table 2 Chromosomal complement in nuclei obtained from multinucleated blastomeres. Variable No. of nuclei found in each blastomere after spreading and FISH for 2 or 3 chromosomes 1 2 3 1 2 3 Blastomeres 4 32 2 18 124 9 189 Nuclei 4 64 6 18 248 28 368 x xxxx Nuclei with each blastomere with two nuclei each with diploid sets of all chromosomes tested was transferred on day 5 post insemi-nation. One sac and one fetal heart were detected. A girl balanced for the translocation, determined by amniocente-sis, was delivered. In the SGD testing carried out for the exclusion of Hun-tington’s disease (Jasper et al., 2006) in a 33-year-old female patient with four previous failed IVF and SGD cycles, there were six embryos available for biopsy. Nuclei were seen in only three of these six embryos. Two embryos had low and one had high risk for carrying the disease allele. No. of nuclei found in each blastomere after spreading and FISH for 5 chromosomes Total An embryo that had an MN blastomere carrying the low-risk allele identified using five linked STR markers was trans-ferred on day 5 at the blastocyst stage and a single healthy delivery was achieved. In 14 PGD cycles, biopsied embryos containing MN and mononucleated blastomeres free of the genetic abnormali-ties tested were transferred together, but only one delivery originating from a MN embryo was achieved. A patient with Robertsonian translocation 45,XY,der(13;21)(q10;q10) had 12 COC collected. Nine embryos were available for biopsy, four of which were diploid and transferred. Three of the chromosomal complement xxx Uniformly diploid 2 22 – 3 50 4 81 Diploid abnormal – 1 – 6 80 2 89 Uniformly haploid 1 7 3 3 12 3 29 Haploid abnormal – 2 – – 9 2 13 Polyploid – – – – 9 – 9 Chaotic 1 32 3 6 88 17 147 Values are n. Diploid abnormal = nuclei diploid for all except one or two chromosomes; haploid abnormal = nuclei haploid for all except one or two chromosomes.
  • 5. 384 A Yilmaz et al. four blastomeres removed from these four embryos were mononucleated and carried two X chromosomes. Conclusive microscopic evidence showed that the blastomere carrying the X and Y chromosomes biopsied from the fourth embryo was clearly binucleated but one of the nuclei was not found after spreading. The analysed nucleus was diploid for all chromosomes tested. A girl and a boy were delivered, indi-cating that one of the deliveries originated from the embryo with the MN blastomere carrying the X and Y chromosomes. Six more pregnancies were achieved in these 14 cycles but it was not possible to determine whether the deliveries origi-nated from MN or mononucleated embryos based on the information obtained from the sex chromosomes. Each embryo contained a mean of 6.4 blastomeres before biopsy on day 3. Two blastomeres were removed from 42 embryos. Both cells were mononucleated in 21 of these 42 embryos whereas one cell was mononucleated and the other was MN in 19 embryos. Both cells were MN in only two of these embryos. Interestingly, in one of the PGD cycles, eight of the 13 embryos biopsied had MN blasto-meres. The 32-year-old patient, a carrier of muscular dys-trophy, had a large number of COC (n = 27) collected in that cycle. Fifty-three of embryos derived from 189 MN blastomeres (28.0%) were available for reanalysis on days 4 or 5 post insemination. Twenty-four (45.3%) of these reanalysed embryos were chaotic, 11 (20.8%) were diploid, 11 (20.8%) were mosaic and seven (13.2%) were aneuploid or polyploid. Analysis of chromosomal complement in nine reanalysed embryos that had MN blastomeres consisting of two chromo-somally identical nuclei on day 3 post insemination showed that six of these embryos were mosaic or diploid and thus, had the potential for implantation if transferred. The remaining three of these nine embryos were chaotic, poly-ploidy or mixoploid. On the other hand, 12 of 16 reanalysed embryos with blastomeres consisting of two chaotic nuclei on day 3 were chaotic or aneuploid on days 4 or 5 post insemination. Analysis of aneuploidy rates for chromosomes 13, 16, 18 and 21 in MN and sibling embryos showed 12.6–18.1% higher monosomy (P 0.03) and 12.5–18.1% lower disomy (P 0.02) in MN than sibling embryos (Supplementary Table 1, available online) except for the difference in disomy rates for chromosome 16 which did not reach statis-tical significance (12.5% lower in MN embryos). In the anal-ysis of chromosome 22, MN embryos showed a trend towards higher monosomy and lower disomy than sibling embryos, although the differences were smaller and statistically non-significant (i.e. 8.3% higher monosomy and 8.7% lower disomy in MN embryos compared with siblings). Percentage trisomy for all chromosomes was similar between MN and sibling embryos. Discussion Multinucleation is one of the most common nuclear abnor-malities seen in developing human embryos (Agerholm et al., 2008; Meriano et al., 2004) and may complicate the genetic diagnosis in PGD and PGS cycles. Each nucleus may consist of a different chromosomal complement and it is conceivable that the different genetic contribution by each nucleus may compromise the PCR efficiency in SGD testing. This study analysed data obtained in 380 PGD or PGS cycles to investigate the nature, frequency and clinical rel-evance of multinucleation. Overall, 6.1% of all embryos screened were MN. At least one MN embryo was found in 41.3% of all PGD or PGS cycles included. Number of COC col-lected per cycle (P 0.01), but not maternal age, was asso-ciated with multinucleation. Similar results on age (Van Royen et al., 2003) and number of COC collected per cycle (Jackson et al., 1998) have been reported previously, except that Moriwaki et al. (2004) reported higher rates of multinucleation in embryos obtained from women with advanced maternal age. In the current study, patients with 20 or more COC produced significantly more MN embryos than those who produced 10 or less (51.9% versus 24.3%, P 0.01). Two blastomeres were biopsied from 42 embryos. Both blastomeres were mononucleated in 50.0% of these embryos. In 45.2% of embryos, only one blastomere, and in 4.8% of embryos both blastomeres, were MN, suggesting that most of the remaining cells after removal of two blas-tomeres in MN embryos were probably mononucleated. Analysis of chromosomal complement in MN blastomeres is shown in Table 2. Of all nuclei, 22.0% (81/368) were uni-formly diploid and 7.9% (29/368) were uniformly haploid for the chromosomes tested. The remaining nuclei were cha-otic, aneuploid or polyploid. These results suggest that while some nuclei in MN blastomeres are diploid and may be a product of possible failures in cytokinesis, a small portion of them are haploid and may be produced by premature karyokinesis. These results are not in direct agreement with those of Xanthopoulou et al. (2011), who reported a higher percentage overall of diploidy rather than tetraploidy in MN blastomeres. The reason for this discrepancy warrants further investigation but could be due to differences in sample size or the criteria used for classification of the embryos in the two studies. The current results agree with those of Kligman et al. (1996), who reported that the majority of MN embryos were chromosomally abnormal. Successful test results were obtained in 22 of 24 MN blas-tomeres tested for SGD, indicating that multinucleation probably did not have any adverse effects on the perfor-mance of the molecular techniques used in the diagnosis of SGD. Nine of these 22 blastomeres were diploid and unaffected by the SGD screened. The remaining 13 blasto-meres were affected (n = 8), carrier (n = 3) or monosomic (n = 2). On days 4 or 5, 10 embryos that had MN blastomeres tested for SGD were arrested or dead and 11 reached early or hatching blastocyst stage. No data were available on the developmental stages of the remaining three embryos. Although multinucleation has long been considered as a nuclear abnormality (Sathananthan et al., 1990) and trans-fer of MN embryos has generally been avoided (Girardet et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2007), some authors transferred MN embryos diagnosed solely based on light microscopy (Balakier and Cadesky, 1997). Transfer of MN embryos diag-nosed based on fixation and staining of nuclei has also been reported (Ambroggio et al., 2011; Xanthopoulou et al., 2011) although no pregnancy was established in those studies. The current results show that transfer of embryos
  • 6. Multinucleation in human embryos 385 with MN blastomeres that are diploid and free of the genetic abnormalities tested in PGD cycles may result in apparently healthy births. Gestation length in MN cycles with births in this study ranged from 39 to 41 weeks and birthweight ranged from 2.3 to 3.2 kg. No abnormalities were reported during these pregnancies or deliveries. Comparison of aneuploidy rates for chromosomes other than 22 in blastomeres removed from MN and sibling embryos showed 12.6–18.1% higher monosomy and 12.5–18.1% lower disomy in MN blastomeres (Supplemental Table 1). These results suggest that a copy of these chromo-somes may have been lost in some MN blastomeres. The reason for this loss of chromosomes warrants further inves-tigation but could be a consequence of cellular defects (Cimini and Degrassi, 2005) or anaphase lag seen in early human embryos (Coonen et al., 2004). It is known that monosomy is more frequent than trisomy in IVF embryos (Munne et al., 2004) and may contribute to early develop-mental arrest (Rubio et al., 2007). However, as far as is known, there are no published detailed comparison of chromosome-specific aneuploidy rates in MN and sibling embryos. The limitations of FISH performed for detection of a lim-ited number of chromosomes in a single cell removed from the developing embryo should be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. Previous studies have shown that the efficiency of the probes used in FISH and the biological factors such as mosaicism may decrease the accuracy of the results (Magli et al., 2007). However, the FISH protocols have been well optimized in this laboratory (Ao et al., 2006; Bielanska et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010; Figure 1) and the hybridization efficiency of the commer-cial FISH probes exceeds 95% (Wilton et al., 2009). Recently, large studies involving chromosome analysis in early human embryos using FISH in single blastomeres have been pub-lished (Ko et al., 2010; Lim et al., 2008), indicating that FISH is currently considered as one of the reliable methods for chromosome analysis. FISH will probably remain as one of the best methods to analyse chromosomal complement in MN embryos in future studies because the new platforms such as single-nucleotide polymorphism micro-arrays and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (Gutierrez-Mateo et al., 2011; Treff et al., 2011) do not involve spreading of blastomeres, and thus, cannot be used to determine chromosomal complement in individual nuclei. A second limitation of this study is that only one nucleus was found after spreading 22 blastomeres obtained from patients referred for PGS and translocation testing, although two or more nuclei were clearly visible under the microscope before spreading. However, this limitation of the study should not have a large impact on the results because only 22 of 368 nuclei (6.0%) obtained from blasto-meres diagnosed as MN under the microscope were found to lack any sibling(s) after spreading. In summary, these results suggest that the majority of MN blastomeres are chromosomally abnormal, and thus, embryos with these blastomeres should not be given priority for transfer when monoucleated embryos are available. However, when genetic analysis is performed, MN embryos that are free of the genetic abnormalities tested may be Figure 1 Representative micrographs of multinucleated blastomeres subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Multiple nuclei in the same blastomere seen under the light (A) and inverted (B) microscope before FISH analysis. (C) FISH using probes for chromosomes 13 (red), 16 (aqua), 18 (blue), 21 (green) and 22 (gold) in a multinucleated blastomere showed trisomy 21 and monosomy 22 in both nuclei (NB: the gold signal for chromosome 22 in the left nucleus appears light yellow). (D) Two nuclei with identical chromosomal complement obtained from a multinucleated blastomere with nullisomy for chromosome 13 and monosomy for chromosomes 16, 18, 21 and 22 in each nucleus. Magnification = ·400 (A), ·200 (B) and ·1000 (C and D). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
  • 7. 386 A Yilmaz et al. considered normal and transferred if each nucleus in the biopsied blastomere(s) consists of diploid sets of all chromo-somes tested. Healthy births are possible after transfer of MN embryos that meet these criteria. Multinucleation, as diagnosed using light microscopy, does not seem to compro-mise efficiency of PCR and other molecular techniques used in the testing for SGD. As far as is known, this is the first report of healthy births following transfer of embryos that had MN blastomeres subjected to genetic analysis for trans-location or SGD and may help clinicians and embryologists in selection of embryos for transfer in future PGD cycles involving MN embryos. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank all of the physicians, nurses and embryologists at the MUHC Reproductive Centre for provid-ing excellent patient care and resources for conducting medical research. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.rbmo.2013.11.003. References Agerholm, I.E., Hnida, C., Cru¨ger, D.G., Berg, C., Bruun-Petersen, G., Kolvraa, S., Ziebe, S., 2008. Nuclei size in relation to nuclear status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four cells embryos. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 25, 95–102. Ambroggio, J., Gindoff, P.R., Dayal, M.B., Khaldi, R., Peak, D., Frankfurter, D., Dubey, A.K., 2011. Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil. Steril. 96, 856–859. Ao, A., Jin, S., Rao, D., Son, W.Y., Chian, R.C., Tan, S.L., 2006. First successful pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in embryos generated from natural-cycle in vitro fertilization combined with an in vitro maturation procedure. Fertil. Steril. 85, e9–11. Balakier, H., Cadesky, K., 1997. The frequency and developmental capability of human embryos containing multinucleated blasto-meres. Hum. Reprod. 12, 800–804. Bielanska, M., Jin, S., Bernier, M., Tan, S.L., Ao, A., 2005. Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage. Fertil. Steril. 84, 336–342. Chatzimeletiou, K., Morrison, E.E., Prapas, N., Prapas, Y., Handy-side, A.H., 2005. Spindle abnormalities in normally developing and arrested human preimplantation embryos in vitro identified by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Hum. Reprod. 20, 672–682. Cimini, D., Degrassi, F., 2005. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 442–451. Coonen, E., Derhaag, J.G., Dumoulin, J.C., van Wissen, L.C., Bras, M., Janssen, M., Evers, J.L., Geraedts, J.P., 2004. Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod. 19, 316–324. De La Fuente, R., King, W.A., 1998. Developmental consequences of karyokinesis without cytokinesis during the first mitotic cell cycle of bovine parthenotes. Biol. Reprod. 58, 952–962. Dean, N.L., Loredo-Osti, J.C., Fujiwara, T.M., Morgan, K., Tan, S.L., Naumova, A.K., Ao, A., 2006. Transmission ratio distortion in the myotonic dystrophy locus in human preimplantation embryos. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 299–306. Girardet, A., Fernandez, C., Claustres, M., 2009. Rapid and powerful decaplex and dodecaplex PGD protocols for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 19, 830–837. Gutierrez-Mateo, C., Colls, P., Sanchez-Garcı´a, J., Escudero, T., Prates, R., Ketterson, K., Wells, D., Munne, S., 2011. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for compre-hensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil. Steril. 95, 953–958. Hardy, K., Winston, R.M., Handyside, A.H., 1993. Binucleate blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro: failure of cytokinesis during early cleavage. J. Reprod. Fertil. 98, 549–558. Harper, J.C., Sengupta, S.B., 2012. Preimplantation genetic diag-nosis: state of the ART 2011. Hum. Genet. 131, 175–186. Jackson, K.V., Ginsburg, E.S., Hornstein, M.D., Rein, M.S., Clarke, R.N., 1998. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertiliza-tion- embryo transfer cycles. Fertil. Steril. 70, 60–66. Jasper, M.J., Hu, D.G., Liebelt, J., Sherrin, D., Watson, R., Tremellen, K.P., Hussey, N.D., 2006. Singleton births after routine preimplantation genetic diagnosis using exclusion testing (D4S43 and D4S126) for Huntington’s disease. Fertil. Steril. 85, 597–602. Kligman, I., Benadiva, C., Alikani, M., Munne, S., 1996. The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum. Reprod. 11, 1492–1498. Ko, D.S., Cho, J.W., Park, S.Y., Kim, J.Y., Koong, M.K., Song, I.O., Kang, I.S., Lim, C.K., 2010. Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and analysis of meiotic segregation modes in reciprocal translocation carriers. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152A, 1428–1433. Lim, C.K., Cho, J.W., Song, I.O., Kang, I.S., Yoon, Y.D., Jun, J.H., 2008. Estimation of chromosomal imbalances in preimplantation embryos from preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles of reciprocal translocations with or without acrocentric chromo-somes. Fertil. Steril. 90, 2144–2151. Magli, M.C., Gianaroli, L., Ferraretti, A.P., Lappi, M., Ruberti, A., Farfalli, V., 2007. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil. Steril. 87, 534–541. Meriano, J., Clark, C., Cadesky, K., Laskin, C.A., 2004. Binucleated and micronucleated blastomeres in embryos derived from human assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online 9, 511–520. Moriwaki, T., Suganuma, N., Hayakawa, M., Hibi, H., Katsumata, Y., Oguchi, H., Furuhashi, M., 2004. Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomere nuclei. Hum. Reprod. 19, 152–156. Munne, S., 2003. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and human implantation – a review. Placenta 24, S70–76. Munne, S., Bahce, M., Sandalinas, M., Escudero, T., Marquez, C., Velilla, E., Colls, P., Oter, M., Alikani, M., Cohen, J., 2004. Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod. Biomed. Online 8, 81–90. Rubio, C., Rodrigo, L., Mercader, A., Mateu, E., Buendia, P., Pehlivan, T., Viloria, T., de los Santos, M.J., Simo´n, C., Remohi, J., Pellicer, A., 2007. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development. Prenat. Diagn. 27, 748–756. Sathananthan, H., Bongso, A., Ng, S.C., Ho, J., Mok, H., Ratnam, S., 1990. Ultrastructure of preimplantation human embryos co-cul-tured with human ampullary cells. Hum. Reprod. 5, 309–318. Scott, L., Finn, A., O’Leary, T., McLellan, S., Hill, J., 2007. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and
  • 8. Multinucleation in human embryos 387 applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod. 22, 230–240. Staessen, C., Van Steirteghem, A., 1998. The genetic constitution of multinuclear blastomeres and their derivative daughter blastomeres. Hum. Reprod. 13, 1625–1631. Treff, N.R., Northrop, L.E., Kasabwala, K., Su, J., Levy, B., Scott Jr., R.T., 2011. Single nucleotide polymorphism micro-array- based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil. Steril. 95, 1606–1612. Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., Vercruyssen, M., De Neubourg, D., Valkenburg, M., Ryckaert, G., Gerris, J., 2003. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum. Reprod. 18, 1062–1069. Wang, W.H., Abeydeera, L.R., Prather, R.S., Day, B.N., 2000. Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1177–1183. Wilton, L., Thornhill, A., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Sermon, K.D., Harper, J.C., 2009. The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Hum. Reprod. 24, 1221–1228. Xanthopoulou, L., Delhanty, J.D., Mania, A., Mamas, T., Serhal, P., Sengupta, S.B., Mantzouratou, A., 2011. The nature and origin of binucleate cells in human preimplantation embryos: relevance to placental mesenchymal dysplasia. Reprod. Biomed. Online 22, 362–370. Zhang, X.Y., Ata, B., Son, W.Y., Buckett, W.M., Tan, S.L., Ao, A., 2010. Chromosome abnormality rates in human embryos obtained from in-vitro maturation and IVF treatment cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online 21, 552–559. Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest. Received 18 November 2012; refereed 16 October 2013; accepted 5 November 2013.