The document provides feedback on a paper discussing sustainability in Canada. It notes that the paper needs to clarify whether it is discussing the past or future of sustainability. It also suggests explaining who is developing the land being deforested, such as for housing, and developing the ideas further to draw stronger conclusions. The document concludes by advising to write out references fully according to the specified style guide.

1. 1. The title suggests you are looking at the future (Can), the CI suggests the past is your focus (did and was). Make sure you make it clear which you are talking about e.g. up until now or up to now and including the future?<br />2. In the first part you say it is sustainable because of govt ownership. Then in the second part you talk about a growing number of developments. Does this mean the govt is doing the developing. I suppose the point is, it doesn't matter who is doing it, the deforestration is ongoing. perhaps you should mention the resons for it e.g. land for housing etc.<br />3. The ideas are there, you need to develop them some more and then come to conclusions.<br />4. Write the references out in full and correctly, according to the models in the pink book. There are elements missing<br />