Процессор Intel Xeon

11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
Процессоры Intel® Xeon®
Игорь Рудым
Менеджер по развитию рынка компании Intel

2
* Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
Legal Disclaimer
• Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice.
• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate
performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration
may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or
components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products,
visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations
• Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document.
Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported
and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase.
• Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family,
not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details.
• Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product
to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request.
• Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled
chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more
information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here
• Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost
Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC
manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see
http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost
• Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and
applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary
depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in
development.
• 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers
and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations.
Consult with your system vendor for more information.
• Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC,
Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package.
• Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900
PPM chlorine.
• Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its
subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.
• © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission

3
Базируется на лидирующей
платформе Xeon® 5500
Перспективная платформа
для виртуализации
Увеличенная
производительность до
40%1
Улучшенная Энерго-
Эффективность
Новые функции
безопасности
Серия процессоров Intel® Xeon® 5600
Технология 32нм со вторым поколение High-k диэлектрика
• 1 Source: Internal Intel measurements based on Xeon® X5680 vs. Xeon® X5570 – Measured results on SPECint*_rate_base2006 and OLTP workload. See backup for system
configurations.
Intel® 5520
Chipset
PCI Express* 2.0
ICH 9/10Intel® X25-E
SSDs
Intel® 82599
10GbE Controller
Intel® Data
Center Manager
Intel® Node Manager
Technology
Intel®
Xeon® 5600
Intel®
Xeon® 5600
130W
95W
80W
60W (6C)
40W (4C)

4
Intel® Виртуализация & Безопасность
Intel® AES-NI
Аппаратные функции
шифрования
Шифрование
Intel® TXT
Защита при миграции
виртуальных систем
Защита
VMM
VM
1
??
VM
2
VM
1
Intel® VT &
Intel® TXT
Изоляция виртуальных
систем
Изоляция
Intel® TXT
Запускает только
подписанные ОС
VM
1
VM
2
VMM

5
Advanced
• 6.4 GT/s QPI
• 8MB / 12MB
• DDR3 1333
• Turbo Boost
• HT
Standard
• 5.86 GT/s QPI
• 8MB / 12MB
• DDR3 1066
• Turbo Boost
• HT
Basic
• 4.8 GT/s QPI
• 4M cache
• DDR3 800
80W
L5640 6C
2.26 GHz1
Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600
Xeon®
5500Применение
Xeon®
5600
X5570
2.93 GHz
X5560
2.80 GHz
X5550
2.66 GHz
E5540
2.53 GHz
E5530
2.40 GHz
E5520
2.26 GHz
E5506
2.13 GHz
E5504
2.00 GHz
95W
95W
95W
80W
80W
80W
80W
80W
E5502
1.86 (2C)
80W
X5670 6C
2.93 GHz
X5660 6C
2.80 GHz
X5650 6C
2.66 GHz
E5640 4C
2.66 GHz
E5630 4C
2.53 GHz
E5620 4C
2.40 GHz
95W
95W
95W
80W
80W
X5680 6C
3.33 GHz
130W
E5507
2.26 GHz (4C)
E5506
2.13GHz (4C)
80W
80W
E5503
2.00 GHz (2C)
80W
60W
80W
L5630 4C
2.13 GHz2
40W
L5609 4C
1.86 GHz3
40W
Xeon
®
5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs
Xeon
®
5500 SKUs
LowPowerOptions
X5677 4C
3.46 GHz 130W
Freq-Optimized
X5667 4C
3.06 GHz
95W
Максимальная
производи-
тельность
6 Cores
4 Cores
(freq optimized)
Экономичное
Higher Frequency
Xeon®
E5500 SKUs
Лучшая
цена/производит.
Higher Freq
More Cache
1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz
2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz
3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off.

6
Эволюция с процессорами
серии Intel® Xeon® 5600
Xeon®
5300
Xeon®
5400
Xeon®
5500
2007 2008 2009 2010
Xeon®
5600
Intel® VT FlexMigrationпенсионеры
Новые серверы для растущего бизнеса
Производительно, энергопотребление, виртуализация
Совместимость с Intel® VT FlexMigration
Расширение архитектуры (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT)
Обновление
Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on
internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance.
For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.

7
2010
обновление
15:1
Годовое сокращение
энергопотребления
на 93%
1 серверная стойка на
базе Intel® Xeon® 5600
1:1
Прирост
производительности
до 15x
15 серверных стоек
на базе Intel® Xeon®
5600
Предполагаемое
сокращение годового
8%
Тот же уровень
2005
15 стоек
одноядерных
серверов
Intel® Xeon®
Серверное обновление: 2010
Физическая консолидация с одноядерных  Xeon® 5600
– или –
Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and
are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and
assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.

8
1:1
Прирост
до 5x
5 серверных стоек на
базе Intel® Xeon®
5600
Предполагаемое
сокращение годового
8%
Прирост
производительност
и до 5x
Прирост
и до 5x
Прирост
и до 5x
Прирост
и до 5x
2006
5 стоек
двухядерных
серверов
Intel® Xeon®
– или –
Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and
are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and
assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
Серверное обновление: 2010
Физическая консолидация с двухядерных  Xeon® 5600
2010
обновление
5:1
Годовое сокращение
на 82%
1 серверная стойка на
базе Intel® Xeon®
5600
Тот же уровень

9
Платформа для 4 процессоров
Intel Xeon 7500
IO HUB
IO HUB
Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX
Intel® Scalable
Memory Buffer
Память
8 ядер, 64 потока
24Mb кэш L3
Архитектура QPI
Буферизованное соединение
Intel™ Scalable Memory
Interconnect
64 DIMM слотов – до 1 Тб
памяти
Подсистема ввода-вывода
нового поколения с
аппаратной виртуализацией

10
Возможности Nehalem-EX: 8
сокетов
Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer
Memory
Nehalem-EX
Nehalem-EX
Nehalem-EX
Nehalem-EX
IO HUB IO HUB
IO HUB
IO HUB
8 сокетов и 128 потоков
команд
Масштабируемость за счѐт
модульности
Возможности
отказоустойчивости уровня
Machine Check Architecture
High-end системы
корпоративного уровня

11
Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500
Series Product Options
+ 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed
¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in
a single system)
**Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz)
***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller
8 and 4 socket/ Scalable
Advanced features available on higher end processors
Usage
Processor
Number/Freq
¥Max
Scale
Glueless
Cores/
Threads Cache
QPI
Speed
Max Mem
Speed TDP
**
Turbo HT
Advanced
X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt
8/16
24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3 
X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3 
Standard
X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No
E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt
6/12
18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2 
E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2 
Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo 
Low Voltage
L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5 
L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5 
Usage
Processor
Number/Freq
¥Max
Scale
Glueless
Cores/
Threads Cache
QPI
Speed
Max Mem
Speed TDP
**
Turbo HT
Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3 
Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2 
Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz)
2 skt only
2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo 
2 socket/ Scalable

12
Прирост производительности
Процессоры Intel Xeon® серии 7500 (Nehalem-EX)
Intel® Turbo Boost
Technology
Intel® Hyper-Threading
Technology
При благоприятных условиях,
увеличивает производительность за
счет увеличения частоты процессора
Frequency
Core0
Core1
Core2
Core3
Все ядра на
стандартной
частоте
Все ядра на
повышенно
й частоте
Core0
Повышенная
производительность по
запросу
Несколько ядер
на еще более
высокой
частоте
4C TurboNormal <4C Turbo
Увеличивает производительность
потоковых приложений ускоряя
обработку и снижая время отклика
Повышенная
производительность для
потоковых приложений
Up to 30% higher†
Core1
Core2
Core3
Core0
Core1
† Source: Intel internal measurements, January 2009. For notes and disclaimers, see performance
and legal information slides at end of this presentation.
TDP = 105 Ватт
Idle = 10 Ватт

13
Процессоры Intel® Xeon® 7500
4S сравнение с 2S Xeon® серия 5600
Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010.
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any
difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or
components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect
actual performance.
Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Почти в 2.2x раза быстрее, чем Xeon® 5600
1.95
2.01
2.04
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.17
2.19
1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline
SPECompM*2001
VMmark*
SPECint*_rate_base2006
SPECmpi*2007
SAP* SD 2-tier
SPECjAppServer*2004
SPECjbb*2005
SPECfp*_rate_base2006
Relative results
Higher is better
4S/64TIntel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560(24M
Cache,2.26GHz,6.40GT/sIntel®QPI)
Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See
notes for details.
(6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)

14
Advanced RAS
Необходима экосистема
Состоит из трех частей: Кремния, Инновация и ОС
Mission Critical OS
OEM Innovation
Intel Silicon

15
Memory
• Inter-socket Memory Mirroring
• Intel® Scalable Memory
Interconnect (Intel® SMI)
Lane Failover
• Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over
• Intel® SMI Packet Retry
• Memory Address Parity
• Failed DIMM Isolation
• Memory Board Hot
Add/Remove
• Dynamic Memory Migration*
• OS Memory On-lining *
• Recovery from Single DRAM
Device Failure (SDDC) plus
random bit error
• Memory Thermal Throttling
• Demand and Patrol scrubbing
• Fail Over from Single DRAM
Device Failure (SDDC)
• Memory DIMM and Rank
Sparing
• Intra-socket Memory Mirroring
• Mirrored Memory Board Hot
Add/Remove
Аппаратное устранение ошибок
Функции обеспечения надежности Xeon® 7500
Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500
* Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans
Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms
Более 20 функций RAS в процессорах Intel Xeon 7500
I/O Hub
• Physical IOH Hot Add
• OS IOH On-lining*
• PCI-E Hot Plug
CPU/Socket
• Machine Check Architecture
(MCA) recovery
• Corrected Machine Check
Interrupt (CMCI)
• Corrupt Data Containment
Mode
• Viral Mode
• OS Assisted Processor Socket
Migration*
• OS CPU on-lining *
• CPU Board Hot Add at QPI
• Electronically Isolated (Static)
Partitioning
• Single Core Disable for Fault
Resilient Boot
Intel® QuickPath Interconnect
• Intel QPI Packet Retry
• Intel QPI Protocol Protection
via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling)
• QPI Clock Fail Over
• QPI Self-Healing

16
HW Un-correctable Errors
Machine Check Architecture Recovery
Аппаратное устранение ошибок на системах Xeon
раньше, только в RISC, mainframe, и Itanium системах
*Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache
Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors
Normal Status
With Error
Prevention
System
Recovery
with OS
Error
Corrected
Error
Detected*
Error
Contained
HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors
System works in
conjunction with OS or
VMM to recover or
restart processes and
continue normal
operation
Bad memory location
flagged so data will not
be used by OS or
applications
Error information
passed to OS /
VMM
MCA Recovery

17
Увеличение
эффективности
20:1
Снижение ежегодных
расходов на
электроэнергию до
92% (Ожидаемый результат)
1 стойка с серверами
на базе процессоров
Intel® Xeon® 7500
Срок окупаемости
<1 года (оценка)
Источник: Собственные измерения Intel от марта 2010 г. Сравнивались системы на базе процессоров Xeon 7500 и
четырехпроцессорные системы на базе одноядерных процессоров Xeon MP. Производительность сравнивалась по
результатам эталонного теста SPECint_rate_base2006. Результаты оценки основаны на собственном анализе Intel и
приводятся только для информационных целей.
Любые различия в аппаратных средствах, программном обеспечении или конфигурации системы могут повлиять на
- ИЛИ -
2010 г.
Увеличение
производитель-
ности
1:1
Производительнос
ть выше
до 20 раз
(Ожидаемое
увеличение)
20 стоек с серверами
на базе процессоров
Intel® Xeon® 7500
2005 г.
20 стоек с
серверами на базе
одноядерных
процессоров
Intel® Xeon®
Обновление серверного парка: 2010 г.

18
Что еще, кроме процессора
1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results.
Итоги1
• Up to 46X lower power
• Lower TCO (fewer drives)
• Up to 6X read perf improvement
Итоги1
• Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth
• >5X port count reduction
• Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction
Сетевые интерфейсы
• Unified networking
• Eliminate switches/cables
• Scalable with multi-core CPUs
SSD
• Низкое энергопотребление
• Высокая надежность
• Самый быстрый HDD
Intel® 10GbE
Intel® X25-M
SSDs

19

20
Performance Summary Backup
Mainstream Server Benchmarks
42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following:
• Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008-
20091023-00205.html
• New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per
processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft®
Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org
46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following:
• Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210-
00803.html
• New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W
TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1
x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008
amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732
http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef
27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following:
• Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D
• New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W
TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of
SAP SD benchmark users
40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following:
• Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253
• http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html
• New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP),
Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC),
1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15
2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355
42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following:
• Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see
www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf
• New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core,
130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K
RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see:
www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.

21
Performance Summary Backup
Technical Computing Benchmarks
• STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4
GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM
SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s
New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core,
130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat
EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s.
• CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo
Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for
scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications
New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP),
Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0
for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications
• SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following:
Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html
New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum
Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM
SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads:
248.
• LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI,
95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA
HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications
New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W
TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD
RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications
• LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3,
6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered
ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops.
New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-
core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB
10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops.
• BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level
cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing
as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds.
New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI),
24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010.
SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.

22
5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up
• 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel®
Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation
includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating
system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10
per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system
license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list
prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate.
Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java
benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during
the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared
to baseline was 15x.
– Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2
Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows*
Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances
– New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33
GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard
drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build
P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances
• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or
components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by
those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may
affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to
evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing.
For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products,
visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

23
Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details
2005 2010 Delta / Notes
Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz
with 2M cache
Intel® Xeon® X5680
(3.33GHz)
Performance
per Server
1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a
server side java benchmark as of
Feb 2010
Server Power
Idle / Active Power
228W idle / 382W
active
117W idle / 383W
active
Server idle for 16 hours per day
and active for 8 hours per day
# Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation
# Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack
15:1 Rack
Consolidation
Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938
Up to 95% lower
energy costs
Total Annual
Energy Costs
$154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year.
Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor
Operating System
Licensing Costs
$283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year
Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900
Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08
Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593
Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server
Estimated Payback Period of 5 months

24
15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up
• 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel®
Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes
analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system
annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per
kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license
cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices
and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance
and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results
(Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state
window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was
5x.
– Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160,
3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply,
Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run
with 2 JVM instances
– New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33
GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard
drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build
P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances
• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or
components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by
those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may
affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to
evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing.
For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products,
visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

25
Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details
2005 2010 Delta / Notes
Product Intel Xeon 5100 series
(3.00GHz)
Intel® Xeon® X5680
(3.33GHz)
Performance
per Server
1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a
server side java benchmark as of
Feb 2010
Server Power
Idle / Active Power
252W idle / 354W
active
117W idle / 383W
active
Server idle for 16 hours per day
and active for 8 hours per day
# Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation
# Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack
5:1 Rack
Consolidation
Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938
Estimated 85% lower
energy costs
Annual Energy
Costs
$56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year.
Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor
OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year
Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900
Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08
Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769
Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server
Estimated Payback Period of 15 months

26
Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006
Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1
• X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev
01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM
SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0.
• E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev
01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel:
2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0.
• L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev

27
Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006
Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1
• X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev
• L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev

28
Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins:
SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006
• SPECint*_rate2006
– L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html
• SPECfp*_rate2006
Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010

29
Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins:
SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006
• SPECint*_rate2006
– L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194
– L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188
• SPECfp*_rate2006
– L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158
– L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155
Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010

30
Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark
Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010.
• Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details
• HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1,
Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html.
• Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details
• IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10
(x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html.
• Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM),
SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see
• Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details
• Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2-
5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0
build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html.
• ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC),
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at
241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html
•
• Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352)
• New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W
TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or
software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on
performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series
SPECint*_rate_base2006
Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.

31
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series
VMmark* Performance (generational)
• Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark
• Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at
http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html
• Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory
(8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see
www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF
• Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory,
VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF
• HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory,
VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008-
10-09-ML370.pdf
• Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details:
• Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8
GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf
• Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details:
• Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB
DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles.
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or
software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on
performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010

32
DDR3L Power Testing:
System Configuration
Item Details
Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server
Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W
TDP, pre-production parts)
Power Supply 1x 450W PSU
Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS
Memory:
4x4GB DDR3-1333
2 DIMMs installed per CPU
Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R -
M393B5170FH0-CH9
After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R -
M393B5170FH0-YH9
Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line
Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed
Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V)
After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V)
Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed

Процессор Intel Xeon

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to Процессор Intel Xeon

Similar to Процессор Intel Xeon (20)

More from Nick Turunov

More from Nick Turunov (20)

Процессор Intel Xeon