Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Производительность 
Игорь Сысоев 
17 сентября 2014
Intel Confidential 
INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMP...
3 
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors....
Key Differences Between E5-2600 v2 & E5-2600 v3 
Xeon E5-2600 v2 
“Ivy Bridge-EP” 
Xeon E5-2600 v3 
“Haswell-EP” 
Core Cou...
Advanced 
25-30 MB LLC cache -2.5MB/core 
9.6 GT/s QPI 
DDR4-2133 
Intel® Hyper-Threading 
Intel® Turbo boost 
Standa...
1.20 
1.24 
1.28 
1.30 
1.41 
1.42 
1.44 
1.60 
1.60 
1.67 
1.70 
1.91 
1.97 
2.45 
3.02 
0 
0.5 
1 
1.5 
2 
2.5 
3 
3.5 
...
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family 4-Year Refresh Performance Summary 
7 
3.1 
3.2 
3.2 
3.3 
3.3 
3.4 
6.3 ...
0 
200 
400 
600 
800 
1000 
1200 
1400 
1600 
2006 
Xeon 5160 
(2C, 
3GHz, 80W) 
2007 
X5272 
(2C, 3.4GHz, 
80W) 
2007 
X...
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v2 Product Family Historical 2S Energy Efficient Performance 
9 
Up to 27x 
Higher is bette...
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Die Configurations 
HCC consists of 4 columns and 2 Memory Controllers. ...
Cluster on Die (COD) Mode 
11 
Cluster0 
Cbo LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Sbo 
Sbo 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo LLC 
Cbo...
Cluster on Die (COD) Mode 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Sbo 
Sbo 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo 
LLC 
Cbo LL...
Refresh Performance 
1.41 
3.2 
0 
0.5 
1 
1.5 
2 
2.5 
3 
3.5 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 Launch 
E5-2699 v3 ...
Refresh Performance 
1.41 
3.2 
0 
0.5 
1 
1.5 
2 
2.5 
3 
3.5 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 Launch 
E5-2699 v3 ...
Refresh Performance 
1.30 
3.4 
0.0 
0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2.0 
2.5 
3.0 
3.5 
4.0 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
E5-2699 v3 
...
Refresh Performance 
1.30 
3.4 
0.0 
0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2.0 
2.5 
3.0 
3.5 
4.0 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
E5-2699 v3 
...
Advanced 
Standard 
Basic 
Segmented Optimized 
Low 
Power 
12C 120W 2.3 GHz 
10C 105W 2.3 GHz 
12C 120W 2.5 GHz 
8C 85W 2...
HSW 
IVB 
Up to 42%, 32% 
Up to 31%, 27% 
Up to 30%, 26% 
Up to 21%, 22% 
Up to 35%, 28% 
Up to 17%, 14% 
Up to 24%, 22% 
...
HSW 
IVB 
SPECint*_rate 
_base2006 
Relative Performance 
Up to 25%, 24% 
Up to 23%, 23% 
Up to 24%, 26% 
Up to 26%, 26% 
...
Refresh Performance 
1.24 
3.1 
0.0 
0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2.0 
2.5 
3.0 
3.5 
E5-2660 v2 
(10C, 2.6GHz, 95W) 
Q3'13 Launch 
E5-2...
Refresh Performance 
1.60 
3.3 
0.0 
0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2.0 
2.5 
3.0 
3.5 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 Launch 
E5-...
Refresh Performance 
1.60 
3.3 
0.0 
0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2.0 
2.5 
3.0 
3.5 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 Launch 
E5-...
Refresh Performance 
1.60 
3.30 
0.00 
0.50 
1.00 
1.50 
2.00 
2.50 
3.00 
3.50 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 La...
Refresh Performance 
1.60 
3.30 
0.00 
0.50 
1.00 
1.50 
2.00 
2.50 
3.00 
3.50 
E5-2697 v2 
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 
Q3'13 La...
Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org, details on the next slide. Software and workload...
8.7 
0.0 
2.0 
4.0 
6.0 
8.0 
10.0 
Relative Performance 
Refresh Performance 
X5690 
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) 
JDK7u11 
E5-269...
16.3 
0.0 
5.0 
10.0 
15.0 
20.0 
Relative Performance 
Refresh Performance 
X5690 
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) 
JDK7u11 
E5-2699 ...
28
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных

858 views

Published on

Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных.
Игорь Сысоев, Intel

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных

  1. 1. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Производительность Игорь Сысоев 17 сентября 2014
  2. 2. Intel Confidential INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. Designers must not rely on the absence or characteristics of any features or instructions marked “reserved” or “undefined.” Intel reserves these for future definition and shall have no responsibility whatsoever for conflicts or incompatibilities arising from future changes to them. Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. The products described in this document may contain design defects or errors known as errata which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. The code names presented in this document are only for use by Intel to identify products, technologies, or services in development, that have not been made commercially available to the public, i.e., announced, launched or shipped. They are not "commercial" names for products or services and are not intended to function as trademarks. Contact your local Intel sales office or your distributor to obtain the latest specifications and before placing your product order. Copies of documents which have an order number and are referenced in this document, or other Intel literature may be obtained by calling 1-800-548-4725 or by visiting Intel's website at http://www.intel.com/design/literature.htm. No computer system can provide absolute security under all conditions. Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT) requires a computer with Intel® Virtualization Technology, an Intel TXT-enabled processor, chipset, BIOS, Authenticated Code Modules and an Intel TXT-compatible measured launched environment (MLE). Intel TXT also requires the system to contain a TPM v1.s. For more information, visit http://www.intel.com/technology/security Requires a system with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology. Intel Turbo Boost Technology and Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 are only available on select Intel® processors. Consult your PC manufacturer. Performance varies depending on hardware, software, and system configuration. For more information, visit http://www.intel.com/go/turbo Intel® Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with an enabled Intel® processor, BIOS, and virtual machine monitor (VMM). Functionality, performance or other benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Software applications may not be compatible with all operating systems. Consult your PC manufacturer. For more information, visit http://www.intel.com/go/virtualization The original equipment manufacturer must provide TPM functionality, which requires a TPM-supported BIOS. TPM functionality must be initialized and may not be available in all countries. The TCO or other cost reduction scenarios described in this document are intended to enable you to get a better understanding of how the purchase of a certain products, including Intel products, combined with a number of situation-specific variables, might affect your future cost and savings. Circumstances will vary and there may be unaccounted-for costs related to the use and deployment of a given product. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as either a promise of or contract for a given level of costs. All products, computer systems, dates and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice. Intel® Xeon®, Intel® Atom™ , Intel® Xeon Phi™, Intel® Core™ i5, Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (Intel® TXT), Intel® Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI), Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (Intel® AVX), Intel® Open Network Platform, Intel® Lustre*, Intel® SSD, Intel® Ethernet Controllers and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation or in the US and other countries. Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. * Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. Legal Disclaimer 2
  3. 3. 3 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit third-party benchmark data or the web sites referenced in this document. You should visit the referenced web site and confirm whether referenced data are accurate. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 1. Twenty-seven performance world records based on two-socket configurations. Source as of September 8, 2014. Full details available at: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/benchmarks/server/xeon-e5-2600-v3/xeon-e5-2600-v3-summary.html 2. Comparison based on SPECpower_ssj2008 results published as of Sept 8 2014. New configuration: Sugon I620-G20 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 8x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2, IBM J9 VM, 10,599 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source, results submitted as of Sept 8 2014. 3. Source as of September 8, 2014. New configuration: Hewlett-Packard Company HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java Standard Edition 8 update 11, 190,674 SPECjbb2013- MultiJVM max-jOPS, 47,139 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source. Baseline: Cisco Systems Cisco UCS C240 M3 platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2, Oracle Java Standard Edition 7 update 45, 63,079 SPECjbb2013- MultiJVM max-jOPS , 23,797 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source. 4. Comparisons based by Intel on publicly available specification sheet data &/or white papers Delivering Leadership Performance 27 New World Records1! Including World’s Most Energy Efficient Server2 Up to 3x performance improvement for efficient, high performance building blocks3 Up to 6x throughput with latest SSD4 Up to 40GbE to improve network virtualization PUBLIC
  4. 4. Key Differences Between E5-2600 v2 & E5-2600 v3 Xeon E5-2600 v2 “Ivy Bridge-EP” Xeon E5-2600 v3 “Haswell-EP” Core Count Up to 12 Cores Up to 18 Cores Frequency TDP & Turbo Frequencies TDP & Turbo Freq AVX & AVX Turbo Freq AVX Support Intel® AVX 8 DP Flops/Clock Intel® AVX 2 16 DP Flops/Clock Memory Type 4xDDR3 channels RDIMM, UDIMM, LRDIMM 4xDDR4 channels RDIMM, LRDIMM Memory Frequency (MHz) 1866 (1DPC), 1600, 1333, 1033 RDIMM: 2133 (1DPC), 1866 (2DPC), 1600 LRDIMM: 2133 (1&2DPC), 1600 QPI Speed Up to 8.0 GT/s Up to 9.6 GT/s TDP Up to 130W Server, 150W Workstation Up to 145W Server, 160W Workstation Increase due to Integrated Voltage Regulator Power Management Same P-states for all cores Same core & uncore frequency Per-core P-states Independent uncore frequency scaling Energy Efficient Turbo 4 PUBLIC
  5. 5. Advanced 25-30 MB LLC cache -2.5MB/core 9.6 GT/s QPI DDR4-2133 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost Standard Basic Segmented Optimized Frequency Optimized ≥2.5MB/core LLC cache – See SKU 9.6 GT/s QPI DDR4-2133 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 2U cooling Low Power 2.5 MB/Core LLC Cache E5-2650L v3: 9.6 GT/s QPI E5-2630L v3: 8.0 GT/s QPI E5-2650L v3: DDR4-2133 E5-2630L v3: DDR4-1866 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 12C 120W 2.3 GHz 10C 105W 2.3 GHz 12C 120W 2.5 GHz 8C 85W 2.4 GHz 12C 65W 1.8 GHz 8C 55W 1.8 GHz 6C 85W 1.6 GHz Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family SKU Stack Workstation Only 12C 135W 2.6 GHz 10C 105W 2.6 GHz 10C 2S 160W 3.1 GHz 35-45 MB LLC cache - 2.5MB/core 9.6 GT/s QPI DDR4-2133 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 14C (1U) 120W 2.3 GHz 14C (2U) 145W 2.6 GHz 14C (1U) 120W 2.0 GHz E5-2603 v3 E5-2670 v3 E5-2690 v3 E5-2680 v3 E5-2650 v3 E5-2660 v3 8C 90W 2.6 GHz 6C 85W 2.4 GHz 8C (20MB) 135W 3.2 GHz (2U) 6C (20MB) 135W 3.4 GHz (2U) 4C (15MB) 135W 3.5GHz (2U) 6C 85W 1.9 GHz E5-2609 v3 E5-2620 v3 E5-2640 v3 E5-2630 v3 E5-2697 v3 E5-2695 v3 E5-2683 v3 E5-2637 v3 E5-2667 v3 E5-2687W v3 E5-2643 v3 E5-2630Lv3 E5-2650L v3 Legend Medium Core Count (MCC) High Core Count (HCC) 4C (10MB) 105W 3.0GHz (1U) E5-2623 v3 Low Core Count (LCC) 10MB LLC cache 8.0GT/s QPI DDR4-1866 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 1U cooling 25MB LLC cache 9.6 GT/s QPI DDR4-2133 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 18C (2U) 145W 2.3 GHz 16C (1U) 135W 2.3 GHz E5-2699 v3 E5-2698 v3 15 MB LLC cache - 2.5MB/core 6.4 GT/s QPI DDR4-1600 15-20 MB LLC cache - 2.5MB/core 8.0 GT/s QPI DDR4-1866 Intel® Hyper-Threading Intel® Turbo boost 5 PUBLIC
  6. 6. 1.20 1.24 1.28 1.30 1.41 1.42 1.44 1.60 1.60 1.67 1.70 1.91 1.97 2.45 3.02 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 E5-2697 v2 Baseline SPECmpiM*_ base2007 SPECpower*_ ssj2008+ TPC*-H SPECfp*_rate_ base2006 SPECint*_rate_ base2006 SPECompG*_ base2012++ STREAM (Triad) VMmark* 2.5 SAP SD* 2-Tier mweb SPECvirt*_ sc2013 Linpack memcached* SPECjbb2013* MultiJVM critical-jOPs SPECjbb2013* MultiJVM max-jOPs Relative Performance Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) vs. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Generational Performance Summary +Baseline is E5-2660 v2 (10C, 2.2GHz, 95W) ++New configuration is E5-2690 v3 (12C, 2.6GHz, 135W) Source as of Sept 8 2014, see next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others 6 Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3 PUBLIC
  7. 7. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family 4-Year Refresh Performance Summary 7 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4 6.3 8.7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X5690 2011 Launch SPECpower*_ ssj2008+ STREAM (Triad) SPECint*_rate_ base2006 SAP SD* 2-Tier VMmark* 2.x SPECfp*_rate_ base2006 Linpack SPECjbb2013* MultiJVM max-jOPs Preliminary Relative Performance Intel® Xeon® E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) vs. X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3 – 2014 Launch PUBLIC +Baseline is X5675 (6C, 3.06GHz, 95W) Source as of Sept 8 2014, see next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
  8. 8. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 2006 Xeon 5160 (2C, 3GHz, 80W) 2007 X5272 (2C, 3.4GHz, 80W) 2007 X5365 (4C, 3GHz, 150W) 2008 X5492 (4C, 3.4GHz, 150W) 2009 X5570 (4C, 2.93GHz, 95W) 2010 X5680 (6C, 3.33GHz, 130W) 2012 E5-2690 (8C, 2.9GHz, 135W) 2013 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) 2014 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) SPECint*_rate_base2006 performance Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v2 Product Family Historical 2S Integer Throughput Performance 8 PUBLIC Up to 22x increase in integer throughput on Intel® Xeon® since 2006 Higher is better Up to 22X Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
  9. 9. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v2 Product Family Historical 2S Energy Efficient Performance 9 Up to 27x Higher is better Up to 27x increase in energy efficiency on Intel® Xeon® since 2006 Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 2006 Xeon 5160 (2C, 3GHz, 80W) 2007 X5272 (2C, 3.4GHz, 80W) 2007 L5335 (4C, 2GHz, 50W) 2008 L5430 (4C, 2.66GHz, 50W) 2009 X5570 (4C, 2.93GHz, 95W) 2010 X5675 (6C, 3.06GHz, 95W) 2012 E5-2660 (8C, 2.2GHz, 95W) 2013 E5-2660 v2 (10C, 2.2GHz, 95W) 2014 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) SPECpower*_ssj2008 (Overall ssj_ops/watt) PUBLIC
  10. 10. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Die Configurations HCC consists of 4 columns and 2 Memory Controllers. MCC consists of 3 columns 4 (core + LLC slices) and 2 Memory Controllers. LCC consists of 2 columns 4 (core + LLC slices) and single Memory Controller. Not representative of actual die-sizes, orientation and layouts – for informational use only. 14-18 Core (HCC) 4-8 Core (LCC) 10-12 Core (MCC) 10 PUBLIC
  11. 11. Cluster on Die (COD) Mode 11 Cluster0 Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Sbo Sbo Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC HA0 QPI 0/1 IIO HA1 Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Cluster1 Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Core Core Core Core Cbo LLC COD Mode for 18C HSW-EP Supported on 2S HSW-EP SKUs with 2 Home Agents (10+ cores) Targeted at NUMA workloads where latency is more important than sharing data across Caching Agents (Cbo) Reduces average LLC hit and local memory latencies HA mostly sees requests from reduced set of threads which can lead to higher memory bandwidth OS/VMM own NUMA and process affinity decisions PUBLIC
  12. 12. Cluster on Die (COD) Mode Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Sbo Sbo Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC HA0 QPI 0/1 IIO HA1 Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core COD Mode for 14C HSW-EP 12 Cluster0 Cluster1 COD Mode for 12C HSW-EP Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Sbo Sbo Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC Cbo LLC HA0 QPI 0/1 IIO HA1 Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Cbo LLC Core PUBLIC
  13. 13. Refresh Performance 1.41 3.2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 13 Enterprise Benchmark Performance General Computing – SPECint*rate_base2006 Source as of Sept 8 2014. Baseline: Supermicro SuperServer 6027AX-TRF platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2697 v2, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 981. Source. New configuration: Supermicro SuperServer 6028UX-TR4 with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1,390. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. •More cores & larger cache •DDR4 memory •Intel® AVX2 •Cluster on Die snoop mode PUBLIC
  14. 14. Refresh Performance 1.41 3.2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 14 Enterprise Benchmark Performance General Computing – SPECint*rate_base2006 Source as of Sept 8 2014 on SPECint*rate_base2006. Baseline Configuration: 2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X5690 platform, 48GB memory, RHEL 6.2. Compiler version: Intel Compiler 12.1.0. Source. Score: 425. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  15. 15. Refresh Performance 1.30 3.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) X5680 (6C, 3.33GHz, 130W) E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Relative Performance Generational Performance 15 Technical Computing Benchmark Performance Floating Point Throughput – SPECfp*rate_base2006 Source as of Sept 8 2014. New configuration: Supermicro SuperServer 6028UX-TR4 with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECfp_rate_base2006 score: 935. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Baseline: Supermicro SuperServer 6027AX-TRF platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2697 v2, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECfp_rate_base2006 score: 714. Source. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. •More Cores & Larger Cache •DDR4 Memory •Intel® AVX2 •Cluster on Die Snoop Mode PUBLIC
  16. 16. Refresh Performance 1.30 3.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Relative Performance Generational Performance 16 Technical Computing Benchmark Performance Floating Point Throughput – SPECfp*rate_base2006 Source as of Sept 8 2014 on SPECfp*rate_base2006. Baseline Configuration: 2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X5690 platform, 48 GB memory, SLES11* SP1, Intel Compiler 12.1.0. Source. Score: 271. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  17. 17. Advanced Standard Basic Segmented Optimized Low Power 12C 120W 2.3 GHz 10C 105W 2.3 GHz 12C 120W 2.5 GHz 8C 85W 2.4 GHz 12C 65W 1.8 GHz 8C 55W 1.8 GHz 6C 85W 1.6 GHz Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Internal SPECCPU*rate_base2006 Performance Estimates 12C 135W 2.6 GHz 10C 105W 2.6 GHz 14C 120W 2.3 GHz 14C 145W 2.6 GHz 14C 120W 2.0 GHz E5-2603 v3 E5-2670 v3 E5-2690 v3 E5-2680 v3 E5-2650 v3 E5-2660 v3 8C 90W 2.6 GHz 6C 85W 2.4 GHz 8C (20M) 135W 3.2 GHz 6C (20M) 135W 3.4 GHz 4C (15M) 135W 3.5GHz 6C 85W 1.9 GHz E5-2609 v3 E5-2620 v3 E5-2640 v3 E5-2630 v3 E5-2697 v3 E5-2695 v3 E5-2683 v3 E5-2637 v3 E5-2667 v3 E5-2643 v3 E5-2630L v3 E5-2650L v3 4C (10M) 105W 3.0GHz E5-2623 v3 18C 145W 2.3 GHz 16C 135W 2.3 GHz E5-2699 v3 E5-2698 v3 Source as of July 2014: Platform with two E5 v3, Prefetchers, HT & Turbo Enabled, NUMA & COD (LCC-ES) mode, 8x16GB DDR4-2133, RHEL 6.4, IC14.0-AVX2, BIOS 27.R01. SIR for E5-2699 v3 used 8x32GB LR-DIMM DDR4-2133. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Frequency Optimized 1060 771 1000 747 960 740 873 686 817 668 695 567 661 534 502 437 305 317 726 577 514 445 1290 870 1190 835 1190 831 1080 782 1050 781 797 632 SPECint*_rate _base2006 estimates SPECfp*_rate _base2006 estimates 266 290 661 557 454 412 414 380 PUBLIC NEW/UPDATED
  18. 18. HSW IVB Up to 42%, 32% Up to 31%, 27% Up to 30%, 26% Up to 21%, 22% Up to 35%, 28% Up to 17%, 14% Up to 24%, 22% SPECCPU*base2006 Relative Performance 18 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 1.00 0.95 0.66 0.44 0.58 0.48 1.00 0.97 0.77 0.57 0.68 0.59 0.56 0.39 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.84 0.81 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.66 0.51 12C 130W 2.7GHz E5-2697 v2 12C 115W 2.4GHz E5-2695 v2 14C 120W 2.3 GHz 14C 145W 2.6 GHz 14C 120W 2.0 GHz E5-2697 v3 E5-2695 v3 E5-2683 v3 18C 145W 2.3 GHz 16C 135W 2.3 GHz E5-2699 v3 E5-2698 v3 6C 135W 3.4 GHz 4C 135W 3.5GHz E5-2637 v3 E5-2643 v3 4C 105W 3.0GHz E5-2623 v3 8C 135W 3.2 GHz E5-2667 v3 4C 130W 3.5GHz E5-2637 v2 8C 130W 3.3GHz E5-2667 v2 6C 130W 3.5GHz E5-2643 v2 6C 60W 2.4GHz E5-2630L v2 10C 70W 1.7GHz E5-2650L v2 12C 65W 1.8 GHz 8C 55W 1.8 GHz E5-2630Lv3 E5-2650L v3 0.89 IVB-to-HSW %gains on SIR, SFR SPECint*_rate _base2006 Relative Performance SPECfp*_rate _base2006 Relative Performance 0.83 Up to 4%, 8% 0.61 0.72 Up to 9%, 10% 0.51 0.64 Up to 12%, 11% 0.35 0.47 Up to 2%, 2% 0.32 0.43 PUBLIC IVB SIR relative to E5-2697 v2 IVB SFR relative to E5-2697 v2 HSW SIR relative to E5-2699 v3 HSW SFR relative to E5-2699 v3
  19. 19. HSW IVB SPECint*_rate _base2006 Relative Performance Up to 25%, 24% Up to 23%, 23% Up to 24%, 26% Up to 26%, 26% Up to 35%, 27% Up to 39%, 29% Up to 23%, 18% Up to 24%, 23% SPECfp*_rate _base2006 Relative Performance 19 0.92 0.89 0.84 0.77 0.70 0.56 0.52 0.44 0.26 0.19 4C 80W 2.5GHz E5-2609 v2 4C 80W 1.8GHz E5-2603 v2 10C 115W 2.5GHz E5-2670 v2 10C 130W 3.0GHz E5-2690 v2 10C 115W 2.8GHz E5-2680 v2 8C 95W 2.6GHz E5-2650 v2 10C 95W 2.2GHz E5-2660 v2 6C 80W 2.1GHz E5-2620 v2 8C 95W 2.0GHz E5-2640 v2 6C 80W 2.6GHz E5-2630 v2 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.84 0.80 0.67 0.63 0.56 0.38 0.30 12C 120W 2.3 GHz 10C 105W 2.3 GHz 12C 120W 2.5 GHz 8C 85W 2.4 GHz 6C 85W 1.6 GHz 12C 135W 2.6 GHz 10C 105W 2.6 GHz E5-2603 v3 E5-2670 v3 E5-2690 v3 E5-2680 v3 E5-2650 v3 E5-2660 v3 8C 90W 2.6 GHz 6C 85W 2.4 GHz 6C 85W 1.9 GHz E5-2609 v3 E5-2620 v3 E5-2640 v3 E5-2630 v3 0.82 0.78 0.74 0.67 0.63 0.53 0.51 0.38 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.78 0.76 0.65 0.61 0.50 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Up to 28%, 25% 0.23 0.36 Up to 50%, 45% 0.20 0.33 SPECCPU*base2006 Relative Performance IVB-to-HSW %gains on SIR, SFR IVB SIR relative to E5-2697 v2 IVB SFR relative to E5-2697 v2 HSW SIR relative to E5-2699 v3 HSW SFR relative to E5-2699 v3 PUBLIC
  20. 20. Refresh Performance 1.24 3.1 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 E5-2660 v2 (10C, 2.6GHz, 95W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5675 (6C, 3.06GHz, 95W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 20 Enterprise Benchmark Performance Energy Efficiency – SPECPower*_ssj2008 PUBLIC Source as of Sept 8 2014. Sugon I620-G20 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 8x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2, IBM J9 VM, 10,599 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Dell Inc. PowerEdge T620 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2660 v2, IBM J9 VM, 8,533 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source. HP ProLiant DL360 G7* with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5675, Source, Score: 3,329 overall ssj_ops/watt. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
  21. 21. Refresh Performance 1.60 3.3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 21 Enterprise Benchmark Performance Virtualization – VMmark 2.x Source as of Sept 8 2014. New Configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, VMware ESXi 5.5.0 U2, VMmark v2.5.2 score: 26.48 @ 22 tiles. Source. Baseline: HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 platform with two Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2, VMWare ESXi 5.1.0 U1, VMmark v2.5.1 score: 16.54 @ 14 tiles. Source .Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. •Higher CPU utilization •DDR4 Memory •Faster QPI Speed PUBLIC
  22. 22. Refresh Performance 1.60 3.3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 22 Enterprise Benchmark Performance Virtualization – VMmark2.x Source as of Sept 8, 2014. Baseline: Fujitsu PRIMENERGY RX300 S6 with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5690, VMware ESXi 4.1 U1, VMmark* v2.1.1 score: 7.59 @ 7 tiles, source. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  23. 23. Refresh Performance 1.60 3.30 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5680 (6C, 3.33GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 23 Enterprise Resource Planning Performance SAP Sales & Distribution* (2 Tier) on Linux Source as of Sept 8 2014. results submitted or published to www.sap.com/benchmark, details on next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. •Cluster on Die snoop mode •More cores & larger cache PUBLIC
  24. 24. Refresh Performance 1.60 3.30 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) Q3'13 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch X5680 (6C, 3.33GHz, 130W) Q1'11 Launch E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) Q3'14 Launch Relative Performance Generational Performance 24 Enterprise Resource Planning Performance SAP Sales & Distribution* (2 Tier) on Linux Source as of Sept 8 2014. results submitted or published to www.sap.com/benchmark, details on next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  25. 25. Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org, details on the next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Java Performance & Benefits of JDK8 1.45 2.62 3.58 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPs Preliminary Relative Performance E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) JDK7u11 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK7u11 + 2x memory E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK8u5 + 2x memory E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK8u11 + 2x memory + optimizations 25 PUBLIC Up to 80% gain from JDK8
  26. 26. 8.7 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Relative Performance Refresh Performance X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) JDK7u11 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK8u11 3.02 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Relative Performance Generational Performance E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) JDK7u45 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK8u11 26 Java Performance SPECjbb*2013-MultiJVM max-jOPs Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  27. 27. 16.3 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Relative Performance Refresh Performance X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W) JDK7u11 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JDK8u20 2.45 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Relative Performance Generational Performance E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W) JDK7u40 E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) JKD8u20 27 Java Performance SPECjbb*2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPs Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. PUBLIC
  28. 28. 28

×