1 final-complete-pm

CreaDev.Design SDN. BHD
Company No: 123456-T
1CONTENA PAVILION/PROJECT 1/2017
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE (HONS)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT (ARC3612)
PROJECT 1: DEFINING & DOCUMENTING A PROJECT/A PLACE FOR ALL/CONTENA
PAVILION
CREADEV DESIGN SDN.BHD
CLIENT: AR. SATEERAH HASSAN
PROJECT MANAGER: GOH YEN NEE /0315551
ARCHITECT: SIEW JOHN LOONG /0315871
C&S ENGINEER: LEE ZU JING /0325706
M&E ENGINEER: KELVIN CHIEW /
QUANTITY SURVEYOR: IVAN LING /
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KIMBERLY WONG /
INTERIOR DESIGNER: JERRIE KIEW WEE KEE /0310202

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECTBRIEF & CLIENT
1.2 COMPANY INTRODUCTION
1.3 ORGANISATION CHART
1.4 EMPLOYEES PROFILE
2.0 PRELIMINARY STUDIES
2.1 CASE STUDY OF CONTENA ARCHITECTURE
2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.1 SITE INTRODUCTION & KEY PLAN
2.2.2 CLIMATIC ANALYSIS
2.2.3 LOCATION PLAN & SITE ZONING
2.2.4 S.W.O.T ANALYSIS
2.2.5 VIEWS FROM SITE
3.0 PROJECTMANAGEMENT
3.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA
3.2 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE
3.3 PERTCHART ANALYSIS
3.4 GANTT CHART
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL
4.1 CONCEPTDIAGRAM
4.2 DESIGN INTENTION & ANALYSIS
4.3 RENDERING VIEW
4.4 FLOOR PLANS
4.5 ELEVATIONS
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING
5.1 FOUNDATION
5.2 SHIPPING CONTAINER
5.3 CONTAINER METHOD CONSTRUCTION
5.4 STEEL STAIRCASE
5.5 METAL DECK ROOF
6.0 M & E ENGINEERING
6.1 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM LAYOUT
6.2 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM LAYOUT
6.3 STORMWATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
6.4 WASTE WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
6.5 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT
7.0 QUANTITY SURVEYING
7.1 BILL OF QUANTITIES
7.2 NETPROFIT
7.3 GROSS DEVELOPMENTBREAKDOWN COST
8.0 LANDSCAPING DESIGN
8.1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
8.2 VEGETATION PROPOSAL
8.3 MATERIAL LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL
8.4 REASONS OF SELECTED LANDSCAPE DESIGN
8.5 LAYOUT LANDSCAPE
8.6 RENDERING VIEWS
9.0 INTERIOR DESIGN
9.1 INTERIOR CONCEPT
LIST OF CONTENTS

9.2 FURNITURE PROPOSAL
9.3 FURNITURE LAYOUT
9.4 LIGHTING FIXTURE PROPOSAL
9.5 FLOOR FINISHES PROPOSAL
9.6 DOOR & WINDOW PROPOSAL
9.7 RENDERING VIEWS
10.0 APPENDIX
10.1 MEETING AGENDAS
10.2 MINUTES OF MEETING
10.3 ATTENDANCES RECORD CCM
11.0 REFERENCES

1.1 PROJECT BRIEF & CLIENT
This projectis to design and establish a pavilion at the lakeside required by the client from Taylor’s Lakeside University
with the needs of using container to be the main material for the pavilion. It also to fulfil space requirement for the
architecture and design student nearby in order to identity space for art. It have to be urgently complete in 6 months’
time due to upcoming International Conference to be held at the Taylor’s University.
CLIENT OBJECTIVE
 TO BECOME A DESIGN INNOVATIVE & EXCELLENCE CENTRE
 TO ENCOURAGE THE COMMUNITY TO BE APPRECIATIVE TOWARDS ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY
 TO PROMOTE CREATIVE EXCELLENCE TO A HIGHER LEVEL
CLIENT’S REQUIREMENTS
 TO BUILD APAVILION TO HOUSE SELECTED ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN MODELS
 ABLE TO CATER 100 – 150 PERSON AT TIME
 INTERLINKED WITH CAMPUS LINKWAYS
 ENERGY EFFICIENT
 PROGRESSIVE IMAGE
 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OPTIONS
 USE OF CONTENA IS ENCOURAGED
SPACE TO BE INCLUDED
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.2 COMPANY INTRODUCTION
CreaDev Design Sdn. Bhd is an experienced multi-disciplinary architectural practice
which established in the year of 2007 at Ara Damansara, Selangor.
CreaDev Design is known as creative development design which commit to produce a
highest standard of quality in design and service in planning architectural works
through the good team management.
Under the management of highly experienced and well equipped with design team
players in the company, we provide the resources of project management which
starting with planning until to the designing while fulfilling user needs.
VISION
Along with the highly professional teams, we bring all our best in developing the exceptional project to our clients with
good design. Weearn the confidence from clients through creative andinnovative design thatare grounded inexperience.
Our patience, responsible and knowledgeable service become the main choice to our client on giving opportunity and
collaboration of project to us,
MISSION
In the project that we going to develop, we provide exceptional solutions in every each task for satisfying our client’s
specific requirement no matter based on standard quality, project management, and good services as long as the
completion of project is successfully to be done on time.
During the design stage, we will be running an innovative development under the architectural design which enrich the
human experience butstrongly believe in being environmental friendly and responsible in duty.
AWARDS
CreaDev Design Sdn. Bhd have been involved into several well-known architectural projects such as Pavilion 2 in Johor,
Outlet Mall in KLIA 3, and other more in Malaysia area.
We also been awarded during the competition of designing the Dubai tower in the year of 2009 thatexpanded our scope
to be well-recognized in the design scene.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.3 ORGANISATION CHART
CreaDev Design. SDN. BHD practice a combination of collaborative culture in the company which emphasized on the
participation of teamwork in the project.
The importance of interaction between colleagues made the high efficiency& effective teamwork in assisting each other
that provides a friendly and cooperative working environment during the all stages of project.
Under the collaborative team, we tend to produce a good,stable and morestandardized working structure which enhance
a greatachievement in each project thatdevelop the confidence to client.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
PROJECT
MANAGER
AR. GOH YEN NEE
ARCHITECT
AR.SIEWJOHNLOONG
C&S ENGINEER
IR.LEE ZU JING
M&E ENGINEER
IR.KELVIN CHIEW
QUANTITY
SURVEYOR
SR.IVAN LING
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT
AR.KIMBERLY WONG
INTERIOR
DESIGNER
AR.JERRIEKIEW

1.4 EMPLOYEES PROFILE
PROJECT MANAGER
AR. GOH YEN NEE
ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS
 Graduated in the year of 2000 from University of The Bartlett in London, United Kingdom which specialized in
faculty of builtenvironment.
 Masters in Architecture
EXPERIENCES
 -Have involved in the architectural scope for more than 10 years.
 -Being a projectmanager for 5 years that involved in the governmentprojects in Malaysia.
 -Working 2 years in the Singapore Architect firm for urban master planning which involved with the project of
high rise skyscrapers.
RESPONSIBILITIES
 To be ensuring the project to be well succeed on time from its beginning of planning, design, execution,
monitoring, controlling until the closure of the project. To certify every decisions made is well planned during
the solutions of miscellaneous problem in the project.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

ARCHITECT
AR. SIEW JOHN LOONG
 University of Malaya
Bachelor of Science in Architecture
 National University of Singapore
Master of Architecture
WORK EXPERIENCE
 6 years’ experience as an architect
 Planning, designing, and evaluating design strategies
RESPONSIBILITY
 To analyse proposed site location and drawings
 To ensure rules, regulations and guidelines are fulfilled
 To design building based on green features & high GBI rate
 To make sure the design requirementof clientis fulfilled
1.0 INTRODUCTION

C&S ENGINEER
IR. LEE ZU JING
 University of Malaya
Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) in Civil Engineering
 National University of Singapore
Master of Science (Civil Engineering)
WORK EXPERIENCE
 5 years’ experience as a civil engineer
 Planning, designing, evaluating and execution of works
RESPONSIBILITY
 To analyse proposed site location and drawings
 To ensure rules, regulations and guidelines are fulfilled
 To determine structure of the building and selecting the right materials
 To make sure the correct weight transfer from roof to foundation of a building
1.0 INTRODUCTION

M&E ENGINEER
IR. KELVIN CHIEW KAH KHENG
ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION
 Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from University of Newcastle, Australia. (2002-2005)
 Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from University of Western Australia. (2007 -2011)
EXPERIENCES
 Alpha Engineer Pte. Ltd. (2005-2006) Asst. Mechanical Engineer
 Powen M&E Group (2011 – 2016) Mechanical Engineer
 -5 years experiences in Powen M&E Group in Singapore. Involved in projects such as Fullerton Pavilion.
RESPONSIBILITIES
 Designed power supplyand distribution, telecommunications, computing instrumentation, control systems
in public context.
 Engaged in minor green design buildings, field experience such as ensuring proper erected of equipment,
in pre-commissioned and commissioned in accordance.
 Create water supplysystem such as director indirectsystems, harvestsystem. Analyses single phase or
three phase electricity, design lighting distribution layout with electrical fittings, waste water schematic
design and layout.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

QUANTITY SURVEYOR
SR. IVAN LING
 Bachelors of Quantity Surveying from Birmingham City University, UK (1999-2002)
EXPERIENCES
 Working experience in QSA Consultants Sdn. Bhd. for 3 years and additional 4 years in Stan Lee
Construction Sdn. Bhd.
 Handled and managing costing from initial projects until closure/completion of project.
 Involved in research of materials for project finishes, components for landscaping projects and
constructions.
RESPONSIBILITIES
 Preparation of contracts and invoices of amounts and quantities for projects.
 Compare the actual costagainstexisting budgetand according to exercised budgetcontrol procedures.
 To undertake and notifications of costduring conductance of a project.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
AR. KIMBERLY WONG
 HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN (2010-2014)
EXPERIENCES
 Working experience with Singapore for landscape design and strategy for 3 years.
 Mostly take parts in small to large scale projects such as schools, shopping malls and office buildings.
RESPONSIBILITIES
 The preparation of suitable landscape design for environment and to enhance while reconsidering the
needs of good landscape design for the building spaces.
 To enhance the creativity of the space by good influence of landscape features to discover spaces.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

INTERIOR DESIGNER
AR. KIEW WEE KEE
 Texas A&M University (2002-2005) Bachelor of Fine Arts (Interior Design)
 Pratt University (2006-2007) Master of Science Interior Design
EXPERIENCES
 ALM Architects (2009-2016) Interior Designer
 CreaDiv. Design Sdn.Bhd. (Current) Interior Designer
RESPONSIBILITIES
 Develop skills for research, design strategy and a high capacity for aesthetic solution.
 Bring a strong design ethos and my natural enthusiasm and passion for architecture and interior design
industry as a whole.
 Be hardworking, flexible and innovative problem solver who can design buildings that have the right balance
between cost, function and aesthetic.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 CASE STUDY OF CONTENA ARCHITECTURE
THE CONTAINER BAR BY NARTH ARROW STUDIO
It proposed a range of experiences within the area by stacked arrangementof recycled shipping container to provide a
both open and enclosed spaces which forms the container bar. The stacked volumes have each been converted into a
series of private rooms, making their original function as a container unrecognizable when inside. The double volume of
ceiling height in the bar area is covered by a floating steel roof structure to ensure the weather protection, but also
helps in framing the courtyard with the surrounding of vegetation.
Through the case study, itproposed the similar of structural element thathelps to support the roof structure & stacking
containers with our pavilion which designed the indoor & outdoor gallery of housing the architecture & interior working
models.

2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.1 SITE INTRODUCTION & KEY PLAN
KEY PLAN N.T.S
Highlighted area is the proposedsite thatlocated at Jalan Taylors, Subang Jaya, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Our client is basically the Taylor’s University Sdn. Bhd which creates a container pavilion that have the theme “A Place
for All”. Taylor’s University is a high quality educational place which provide a good environment to student to have their
study life more comfortable. It surrounded with residential & commercial area that allows student to be convenient in
staying surrounding.

2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.2 CLIMATIC ANALYSIS
LIGHT
Adequate sun light is planned to fully utilize by the pavilion
which makes itmore visible from the outside to the inside
which would attract people to enter to container pavilion.
WIND
The pavilion is proposed by situating in the good orientation that
allows natural ventilation to take place where the wind blow from
west to east direction.

CIRCULATION
THE BUIDING HAVE EASY ACCESS FOR THE PEOPLE TO ENTER
THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY FOR THE ARCHITECTURE AND
DESIGN COURSE STUDENTS.

2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.3 LOCATION PLAN & SITE ZONING
PARKING LOT
ACADEMIC BLOCK
COMMERCIAL BLOCK
LAKE
SITE
LOCATION PLAN N.T.S
The site is a lake located opposite to block E and block D which near to the architecture & interior design studio. It has a
small pathway in front of it and a pond near to it. Greenery can be found around the site but still, it is very hot as there
is a lack of sun shading device around. It has a nice view of the lake and few seating are provided along the pathway as
well for the students to have activities around. The location of site is a suitable place for housing the model works as it
can be partof the attraction to the university when people passing through the area.

2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.4 S.W.O.T ANALYSIS
Site C is the area which itnears to the architecture & interior course block E thatallows the gallery of their works to be
shown easily when passing through around the area. The larger & ample space which situated at the site is good enough
for ventilation to pass through that can be part of the energy efficiency design features but it hard to construct due to
the water body which required by client. The expose of sunlight dedicated to higher level of hotness which allows the
opportunity of stopping point for users when passing through the area for resting and visit the gallery works. It can be
treat as gathering space for students to do their works and interests in the activity room. The views of the site also
become the opportunity for the pavilion to be created in order to attract people to come.
STRENGTH
- good ventilation
-larger & ample open space
WEAKNESS
-expose to large amount of heat
-hard to construct due to waterbody
OPPORTUNITY
-shelter
-gathering space
-lake view
THREAT
-mosquitoes
-crow
-lizard
S.W.O.T

2.2 SITE ANALYSIS
2.2.5 VIEWS FROM SITE
THE BUILDING HAS GLASS IN 4 DIRECTIONS WHICH ALLOWS
COMFORTABLE VIEW FROM EVERY DIRECTION.
Views from site area

3.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA
PROJECT TRIPLE CONSTRAINT
TIME
This refers to the actual time required to produce the end result of the project. Naturally, the amount of time required
to produce the deliverable will be directly related to the amount of requirements thatare part of the end result(scope)
along with the amount of resources allocated to the project (cost).
 DEALINE: Post Design stage till 10 May 2017
 DEALINE: Completed Project- 6 months starting from April 2017
COST
This is the estimation of the amount of money that will be required to use for the project. All aspects of the project that
have a monetarycomponentare made partof the overall coststructure suchas resources, labourrates forcontractors,
costof materials used, and more.
 BUDGET: RM500,000 for Container Pavilion Project
 Running Cost: lower than a standard building
SCOPE
These are the functional components which create the end productfor the project. The scope itselfis generallyidentified
on the first moment as to give the project the best opportunity and chance of success. (Although scope can also
potentially change during the projectlife-cycle due to some error which known as ‘scope creep’)
 Usage of 50% recyclable products
 Containers that able to cater 100-150 person
 Energy efficiency
QUALITY
SCOPE
COSTTIME
3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

QUALITY
When the requirement listed above meet, the success of the project will be achieved which:
 The container pavilion form a high satisfaction & confidence from the clientbased on their needs
 The containerpavilion helps inreducing the environmental impactbyusingsustainable & environmental friendly
design features
 The container pavilion become the stopping point & attraction for user to visit when passing through the hot
weather.

23
CONTENA PAVILION/PROJECT 1/2017
3.2 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE
WORK BREAKDOWN
STRUCTURE
SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TOPOGRAPHY FIELD
SURVEY
COINCEPTUAL
DESIGN &
SKETCHES
PRELIMINARY
BUILDING DRAWING
CODE RESEARCH
PRELIMINARY COST
ESTIMATION
DESIGN
FINALIZATION
CONSTRUCTION
TECHNIQUE &
MATERIALS
FINALIZATION
DESIGN ISSUE
FINALIZATION
ENGINEERING ISSUE
FINALIZATION CODE
ISSUE
MATERIAL FINISHES
SELECTION
COST ESTIMATION
REVISE
DO SUBMISSION
BP SUBMISSION
AUTHORITHY APPROVAL
TENDER
PREPARATION DETAILED
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS
PREPARATION TENDER
DOCUMENTS
PERMIT
APPLICATION
BIDDING
ANALYSIS
SUBMISSION OF
TENDER DRAWINGS
CONSTRUCTION
SITE INSPECTION TEMPORARY
INSTALLATION
TEMPORARY
ELECTRICITY
INTSALLATION
TEMPORARY SITE
OFFICE
INSTALLATION
UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES
EARTHWORKS
CLEAR LOT
STRIP TOPSOIL &
STOCKPILE
STAKE LOT FORO
EXCAVATE
ROUGH
GRADE LOT
EXCAVATION
BUILDING WORKS
FOUNDATION
DIG FOOTING
REINFORCING
INSTALL
DECK & WALL
FRAMING
ROOFING INSTALL
WINDOWS & DOOR
INSTALL
BASEMENT SLAB
PREPARATION
EXTERIOR FINISHES
& INSULATION
ROADWORKS &
DRAINAGE
PLUMBING ROUGH-
IN
PIPING
INSTALLATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM
INSTALL
MECHANICAL &
ELECTRICAL
SET ELECTRIC BOX
INSTALLATION ELECTRIC
SERVICE PANEL
FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEM
INSTALL
LANDSCAPING
WORK
SIDEWALK DECK L
PATIO INSTALL
FINAL GRADE SEED
COMPLETION
& HANDLING OVER
BUILDING
INSPECTION
TOUCH UP &
CLEANING
CCC APPROVAL

24
3.3 PERT CHART ANALYSIS
TASK/XTVT PREDECESSOR DURATION/WEEKS
Schematic
Design/A
- 2
Design/B A 2
DO
submission &
approval/C
B 3
BP submission
& approval/D
C 3
Tender/E D 3
Site
inspection/F
E 1
Temporary
work/G
E,F 2
Earthwork/H F 2
Building
Work/I
G,H 5
Roadwork &
Drainage/J
H 3
Mechanical &
Electrical/K
H,I 2
Landscaping
Work/L
J 1
Final Building
Inspection/M
K,L 1
Touch up &
Cleaning/N
M 1
CCC
Approval/O
N 2
2 B 4
2 2 4
0 A 2
0 2 2
4 C 7
4 3 7
7 D 10
7 3 10
25 O 27
25 2 27
10 E 13
10 3 13
14 G 16
14 2 16
16 J 19
18 3 21
16 I 21
16 5 21
24 N 25
24 1 25
13 F 14
13 1 14
14 H 16
14 2 16
21 K 23
21 2 23
23 M 24
23 1 24
19 L 21
21 2 23
FLOAT DETERMINATION
5 WEEKS
FLOAT DETERMINATION
2 WEEKS
CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS
DURATION PATH I: A-B-C-D-E-G-I-K-M-N-O/ 2+2+3+3+3+2+5+2+1+1+2=26
DURATION PATH II: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-I-K-M-N-O/ 2+2+3+3+3+1+2+5+2+1+1+2=27 (CRITICAL PATH)
DURATION PATH III: A-B-C-D-E-F-H-I-K-M-N-O/ 2+2+3+3+3+1+2+5+2+1+1+2=27 (CRITICAL PATH)
DURATION PATH IV: A-B-C-D-E-F-H-K-M-N-O/ 2+2+3+3+3+1+2+2+1+1+2=22
DURATION PATH V: A-B-C-D-E-F-H-J-L-M-N-O/ 2+2+3+3+3+1+2+3+2+1+1+2=25
FLOAT DETERMINATION
1 WEEKS

25
3.4 GANTT CHART

26
4.1 CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
MOVEMENT
THE BUILDING CREATES SOME SORTOF
MOVEMENT THAT CAN ACT AS A DIRECTION
GUIDANCE
INTERACT
THE BUILDING ALLOWS THE INTERACTION TO
HAPPEN BETWEEN IN AND OUT
ACCESSIBILITY
THE BUILDING ALLOWS PEOPLE TO MOVE FROM
ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER EASILY
HOTSPOT
THE BUILDING CAN BE THE ATTENTION SEEKER
BUIDLING AS IT ATTRACT PEOPLE TOWARDS IT
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

27
4.2 DESIGN INTENTION & ANALYSIS
LIGHT
FRONT ELEVATION-LIGHT CAN PASS THROUGH WINDOWS, OPENINGS AND VOID
BACK ELEVATION-LIGHT CAN PASS THROUGH WINDOWS, OPENINGS AND VOID
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

28
RIGHT ELEVATION-LIGHT CAN PASS THROUGH WINDOWS, BALCONIES AND VOID
LEFT ELEVATION-LIGHT CAN PASS THROUGH WINDOWS, BALCONIES AND VOID
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

29
SYMMETRY AND BALANCE
THE BUILDING HAS AN ASYMMETRY DESIGN, BUT SOMEHOW IT ALSO ALMOST ACHIEVE THE SYMMETRY SIDE .
FRONT ELEVATION
BACK ELEVATION
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

30
RIGHT ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

31
WIND
BUILDING ALLOWS PASSIVE VENTILATION TO TAKE PLACE THROUGH OPEN SPACE
FRONT ELEVATION
BACK ELEVATION
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

32
4.3 RENDERING VIEW
PEOPLE ENTER THE BUILDING BY
PASSING THROUGH A GREEN
COURTYARD WHICH PROVIDES
COMFORRTABLE SENSE OF VIEW TO
THE PEOPLE.
AT THE BACK OF THE BUILDING, PEOPLE CAN ENJOY THEIR
MEAL OR DRINKS WHILE HAVING A FANTASTIC VIEW OF THE
LAKESIDE WHICH PROVIDES A PEACEFUL AND SILENCE
ENVIRONMENT.
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL

33
4.0 ARCHITECTURAL
PEOPLE CAN HAVE OUTDOOR GALLERY AND THE
WIND CAN COOL THE ENVIRONMENT, HELPING
THEM TO FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE.
THE BALCONY AT THE OTHER SIDE ALLOWS
PEOPLE TO INTERACT WITH THE SURROUNDING.

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41
5.1 FOUNDATION
Pile foundations are used in the construction of pavilion to support the weight of the platform and the entire structure
above it. It is a system used to transfer loads to a deeper soil layer while resisting vertical, lateral and uplift load.
Considering the location of site where the building is sat on the waterbody of a lake: concrete piles are selected due to
the strength of the material while avoiding the corrosion that mighthappen to steel pile. It is used to transfer the loads
from the structure through the water and into stiffer soil under underneath it.
Advantages of precastconcrete piles:
 High load capacities
 Will notcorrode
 Easy to be connected to each other
 Relatively inexpensive
 Quality check can be done before driving
Comparing to steel piles which are:
 More expensive
 Piles will corrode after some time
 Piles tend to deviate during driving
Precast concrete piles are selected and
they usually come in triangle, circle or
octagonal section. The piles are produced in
one metre intervals between 3 and 13
meters however they can be connected to
reach the required length.
Maximum length – Precast 10-15m
Pre-stressed 20-30m
Optimum load range –
350-3500kN
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

42
PrecastConcrete Pile Foundation:
PrecastConcrete Platform:
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

43
5.2 SHIPPING CONTAINER
Diagram shows the standardised container with specification.
Using shipping container is the main requirement for this project which designed as the container pavilion for
architectural & interior students in housing their model works. A standard shipping container have two different kind of
size which are 20Ft & 40Ft that we going to use in the container pavilion.
5.0 C & S ENGINEERING

44
Specifications:
A) 20 ft. shipping container
Exterior Interior
Length 20'-0" 6.058 m Length 19'-4 13/16" 5.898 m
Width 8'-0" 2.438 m Width 7'-8 19/32" 2.352 m
Height 9'-6" 2.896 m Height 8'-9 15/16" 2.69 m
B) 40 ft. shipping container
Exterior Interior
Length 40'-0" 12.192 m Length 39'-5 45/64" 12.032 m
Width 8'-0" 2.438 m Width 7'-8 19/32" 2.352 m
Height 9'-6" 2.896 m Height 8'-9 15/16" 2.69 m
Acontainer pavilion can be considered as a sustainable building as itcan be reuse after being used forshipping. Bydoing
that, it reduces the amountof abandon containers thus cutting down on the energy needed to melt down the steel.
It can reduce the cost of building construction as the containers are load bearing therefore minimal structures are
needed to construct the building. At the same time, it is versatile as they can be stacked on top of each other creating a
multi-level structure while greatly reducing the construction time.
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

45
Considerations needed for container building:
 Selecting the rightsized container
 Not over cutting steel panels to avoid losing its strength
E.g. removal of all corrugated panels
 Openings e.g. door, window, skylight thatare added should be taken care off to avoid leaking
 Sloping roof has to be used to allow rainwater to run off as the containers have a flat upper surface
 Insulation need to be added to ensure water proofing
 Insulation for hot or cold weather
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

46
5.3 CONTAINER METHOD CONSTRUCTION
1. Setting and securing containers
 Containers arrive on site are crane lifted on the concrete platform
 Containers are then welded to steel plates which are imbedded in the concrete slab to fix them on site
 Containers are connected by fastening them at the corners
2. Installation of doors and windows
 Doors and windows with steel section framing are manufactured off site
 They are then delivered to site for installation

47
3. Installation of plumbing, electrical, HVAC
 M&E works
4. Installation of insulation panels
 Panel insulation comes in predefined sizes and it fits in between gaps of stud walling
 Insulating heat, cold and moisture
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

48
5.4 STEEL STAIRCASE
Steel structural staircase
Steel staircase is used to access to first floor of the pavilion due to:
 Simple installation and lower costcompared to concrete staircase
 Space saving
Proposed Steel Staircase:
Rendering view of steel staircase in pavilion

49
5.5 METAL DECK ROOF
Specifications of metal deck roofing
Advantages of using metal deck roof:
 Great strength
 Easy installation
 Long span
 Lightweight structure
 Low maintenance

50
Proposed Metal Deck Roof:
Rendering view of metal deck roof helps in weather protection.
5.0 C&S ENGINEERING

6.1 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM LAYOUT
1. Interior Lighting Type Details
2. Exterior Lighting Type
ProductName: EcoSmart DL-N14A10FR1-27
Light Color: Daylight
Light Output: 600 Lumens
Color Rendering Index: 90
Watts Equivalent: 65 Watts
Location: Office Areas, Cafeteria & Toilets
ProductName: Philips 387522
Light Color: Daylight
Location: Office Areas & Bookstore
ProductName: EcoSmart 5cSA800STQ101
Light Color: Softlight
Location: Gallery Area
ProductName: Philips 220238
Light Color: Warmlight
Location: Corridor Area
ProductName: Westinghouse TN1198689
Light Color: Warmlight
Power Source: Solar Rechargeable
Location: Platform Area
6.0 MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

3. Switch, Socket & Control Panel
Distribution Box Earth Leakage Circuit Breaker Solar Panel Inverter
4. Mechanical Ventilation
Solar Voltaic Air Conditioner System Electrical Ceiling Fan
(Divides electrical into subcircuits,
providing fuse and protection for
an enclosure)
(Contains high Earth impedance to
prevent shocking, interrupt the circuit if
exceeded voltage detected.)
1 Gang & 3 Gang Wall Switches
1 Gang Wall Switch – Typicallyused insingle rowoflight
arrangement/ air-cond. switch
3 Gang Wall Switch – Used in Gallery spaces where to
produce smaller layout for switches.
Waterproof 13 Ampere Power Point
Waterproof Socket is provided where outdoor
activities occurs and near cafeteria areas to prevent
electrocution occurs.
SmartSolar Voltaic Air Conditioner uses two waypower
supply, The main supply came from pavilion electrical
grid while solar voltaic cells serves as the subsidiary
electrical supply.
Used in cafeteria area where it is partially exposed to
the exterior. However, area in concealed environment it
is substantial to provide air conditioning.
(Converts DC to AC power
supply from solar panel
on rooftop.)

5. Photovoltaic System
Photovoltaic Solar System is introduced into the pavilion as it is highlyrelatable as the site is completely under coverage of sunlight
during morning to dawn time. Photovoltaic system works bidirectional with existing Distributional Unit by introducing the AC/DC
Converter.

6.2 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM LAYOUT
(Note: The pavilion uses cold water supply system no hot water required in the pavilion.)
1. Rainwater Harvest System
Specification:
Sufficiency: Single-time hosing around pavilion/ 20-times usage on toilet hosing.
2. Valves
3. Pipes
ProductName : Vertical
Material : Reinforced PolyStorage Tank
Features: Steel Mounted
Capacity: 125 Gallons / 473 Litres each (Total 3)
Dimension: 158cm (H) x 81cm (D)
Usage: Toilet & Garden Hose.
GATE VALVE
Specification:
Connect main line to
30mm piping
(Adjust the aperture
to control water
flowing volume.)
SERVICE VALVE
Specification:
30mm UPVC piping
(Isolate the supplypipe
with the distribution
pipe, for maintenance
purpose.)
WATER PUMP
Specification:
30mm to 19mm
UPVC piping
(To pump water
from supply line to
distribution line.)
WATER METER
Specification: 30mm
UPVC piping
(To water usage
flowing through
internal valve.)
STOPCOCK
Specification:
19mm UPVC piping
(For services and
maintenance
usage, to cut off
water flow.)
UPVC PIPES
UPVC or known as unplasticized
polyvinyl chloride is used
majorly in pavilion as it
achieves cost-effective and
environment friendly purposes.
Usage: 19mm on distribution
line
HDPE PIPES
HDPE or High-density
polythene is used in supply
line as it provides higher
strength and withstand
higher temperature.
Usage: 30mm on supply line

6.3 STORMWATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
1. Gutter
2. Surface Drainage
3. Rainwater Harvesting
UPVC SQUARE LINE GUTTER
Specification:
100(W) x 110mm (H) UPVC gutter
110(W) X 120mm (H) UPVC support bracket
UPVC SQUARE DOWNPIPES
Specification:
110(W) x 110mm (H) UPVC square downpipes
UPVC ADJUSTABLE OFFSET BEND
Specification:
110(W) x 110mm (H) UPVC square offset
Why uses UPVC Gutter:
 Weatherproof & Durable.
 -EasyMaintenance & Servicing.
 -Great Appearance.
 -Low Noise Generated.
STAINLESS STEEL SURFACE DRAINAGE
Specification:
70mm (W) x 70mm (H) Stainless Steel Channel Drainage
Permeable subsoil and grass on top of surface drainage to direct water to the surface drainage.
Water then channels through drainage and discharge into the lake.
Advantages of Harvesting System
 EasyMaintenance
 Environmental Friendly
 Irrigation Usability
 Financially Effective
 Multipurpose Usage
Disadvantages of Harvesting System
 Unpredictable Seasonal Rainfall
 Starting Cost
 Storage Limits

6.4 WASTE WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
1. Waste Trap & Pipes
2. Venting
3. Services Chamber
FLOOR TRAP
Specification: 200mm x200mm
Stainless Steel Floor Trap
(Used in common toilet area and
cafeteria area for proper discharge of
unwanted wastewater)
P-TRAP
Specification: 75mm
UPVC Pipe
(Commonly used in
pavilion’s sinks and
urinals with connection
to soil pipe)
S-TRAP
Specification: 100mm UPVC Pipe
(Commonly used in pavilion’s
water closets to prevent
intrusion of insects and animals
through sewage line.)
UPVC SOIL PIPE
Specification:
100mm for manhole
connection.
75mm for gully trap
connection.
WALL MOUNTED VENTS
Specification: 200mm (W) x 150mm
(H) PVC Wall Mounted Vents
(Wall Mounted Vents are proposed in
the pavilion as all disposal fitment
located on a single floor.)
VENT PIPES
Specification: 100mm
PVC Vent Pipes
(PVC Vent Pipes is used to
expelled waste air to the wall
mounted vent from soil pipes)
MANHOLE / INSPECTION CHAMBER
Specification: 1200mm (W) x 700mm (L)
Concrete Inspection Chamber
(Inspection Chamber is connected to Taylor’s
University sewer line for proper disposal of
waste.)
GULLY TRAP
Specification: 200mm (W) x 100mm (L) x 150mm
(H)
PVC Gully Trap
(Gully Trap acts as a basin to prevent foul odour
from wastewater expelled by cafeteria & toilets.)

6.5 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT
Taylor’s University
Assembly Point
1. Fire Protection Equipment
FIRE ALARM
(Fire Alarm connected
with Taylor’s University,
hence evacuation point
provided in both sides.)
FIRE
EXTINGUISHER
(Fire
Extinguisher as
main equipment
in pavilion.)
SMOKE DETECTOR
(Smoke Detector to
connect to fire alarm
allows faster
evacuation.)
ALARM CONTROL PANEL
(To distinguish false alarm &
connected to Taylor’s
University Lakeside Campus
to allow bidirectional
evacuation.)

7.1 BILL OF QUANTITIES

7.2 NET PROFITS
ESTIMATED NET PROFIT
Income – Business Operation Cost(Expenses) – Development Cost
= RM 9,392,000
Hence, there will be RM 9,392,000 as netprofit per annum by running the container pavilion.

7.2 GROSS DEVELOPMENT BREAKDOWN COST
PERCENTAGE OF BUDGET ALLOCATION
CONSTRUCTION FEE = RM 329127.70
OVERALL PROJECT COST EXCLUSIVE LAND COST= RM 622315.98

8.1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
OPPOSE THE MOVEMENT PATTERN
Conceptual Intention
CONCEPT IDEA
 To oppose the movement of the lakeside which accommodates the conceptdesign intention of the
architect, which is to create every landscape constant and neat
 To have a firm, neatselection of vegetation to visualize the space
 A firm plant selection that grows in one direction i.e constant growth
INTENTION
 Selection of neat tree with constant growth and which reduced the space consumed
 tree pattern that does nothave leaves that grow drastically that requires low maintenance
8.0 LANDSCAPE DESIGN

8.2 VEGETATION PROPOSAL
JUPITER LOWA TREE
Characteristics:
 Cultivar: Iowa
 Family: Cupressaceous
 Height: 6 ft. to 10 ft.
 Width: 2 ft. to 4 ft.
 Category of shrubs, Evergreen
 low maintenance, good for shading purposes
 Tolerance to animals, drought, heat & humidity,
pollution, slope, wind
DWARF ARTIC WILLOW TREE
Characteristics:
 Cultivar: Nana
 Family: Salicaceae & PlantCategory of Salix
 Height: 4 ft. & Width: 4 ft.
 PlantCharacteristics: Low maintenance, fast-growth
 Tolerances To drastic weather condition, intense
heat, pollution, wind

8.3 MATERIAL LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL
Natural Stone Silica Pebbles
Characteristics
Natural Grass Mat
Characteristics
Advantages:
 Itprovides good textures when walked on barefoot and with
shoes
 Itprovides more eco-friendly features to the spaces
 Itdoes notneed grooming or maintenance
Disadvantages:
 Attracts pests and insects to the space
 Itis hard to replace if itdied
 Ensure to provide enough water regularly
Disadvantages
 It creates mess when it goes
outof the selected boarder
 It cannot be cleaned as there
are large in numbers
 Dirt can easily be hidden
between the pebbles
Advantages:
 Stone are naturally cool in warm weather
 Gives satisfying texture and feelings when
stepped on
 Create the glance of antique and high quality
to the space
 It is a natural element that does not need
maintenance

Wooden Bench
Characteristics
Advantages:
 Itprovides long seating for users
 Itis strong and durable
 It matches with almostof the surrounding
spaces
Disadvantages:
 Itis expensive to purchase
 It will be easily broken by the weather if it
isn’tpainted
 Ithas to be well cared and maintained
regularly
COST & QUANTITY OF MATERIALS LANDSCAPING
Material Cost(RM) Quantity
1)Juniper Iowa Tree 2267.72 13
2)Dwarf Artic Willow Tree 2594.71 17
3) Natural Grass Mat 52.34 5
4)Natural Stone Silica Pebbles 174.22 2
5)Wooden Bench 2540.97 9

8.4 REASONS FOR SELECTED LANDSCPAOE DESIGN
Materials Purpose
Juniper Iowa Tree
Spaces: entrance, cafeteria
 Ithas suitable height to accommodate the human scale
 Itis suitable to shelter most of the spaces
 Ithas good height which can be seen from far distance
Mood: This tree has eye catching characteristics, notonly it creates a pleasant view
to the users with its unique shape butable to shelter at leastone human from the
directsunlight. Ithas intention on drawing attention as the users pass by, which is
mostsuitable for the ground floor
Dwarf Artic Willow Tree
Spaces: balcony
 Ithas suitable height to avoid distractions from users to overlook the
balcony
 Itis a suitable scale to accommodate the ground vegetation to blend
with the grass
Mood: This planthas an interesting mass of shape which gives a neatand pleasant
rounded shape plant that accommodate to the ground. Itprovides the balcony a
spacious platform to allow easy access for the walkway. The luxury to prevent
complication in the balcony space with its unique form which provides little shading
on the ground.
Natural Grass Mat
Spaces: balcony, entrance
 Create leisure and comfort on the platform surface
 Create a suitable habitat ground for trees to grow
Mood: Natural grass will give the indoor space the leisure of feeling athome.
Whereby, it enhance the natural features of the concrete ground when they step into
the building.
Natural Stone Silica
Pebbles
 Itprovides a comfortable and cooling platform to step on
Mood: The intention to brighten up the atmosphere of the spaces which enhances the
look of the flat ground surface.
Wooden Bench  Suitable to accommodate the number of user groups in the space
Mood: It allows to point out more on the natural features of the building. Whereby
every seating will be seated between the vegetation. This will provide a neater look
with the intention of enhancing the concepton creating a constantconcept.

8.5 LAYOUT LANDSCAPE
Legends
Dwarf Artic Willow
Juniper Iowa
GROUND FLOOR PLAN N.T.S
FIRST FLOOR PLAN N.T.S

8.6 RENDERING VIEW
Entrance View
Entrance Walkway View

Cafeteria View
Balcony View

9.1 INTERIOR CONCEPT
SCANDINAVIAN STYLE
Characteristics of Scandinavian Style:
 Simple
 Warm functionality, clean lines, flawless craftsmanship
 Soft colours - right ambiance
 Use of earthy muted tones, natural materials, minimal orientation
MODERN INDUSTRIAL STYLE
Characteristics of Modern Industrial Style:
 Bold, Minimal
 Exposed Structural, Mechanical Elements as showpieces
 Bare beams, visible duct-work
 Exposing all that lies beneath to achieve raw, edge style

9.2 FURNITURE PROPOSAL
MULTI FUNCTIONAL COMPUTER DESK
WITH SHELVES & TRAY
Price: RM188
Quantity: 2
Spaces: Office
MODERN WALNUT SLAB PERFECT WOOD
TABLE SET
Price: RM2705
Quantity: 3
Spaces: Activity Rooms
INDUSTRIAL WOOD + METAL BOOK
SHELF
Price: RM345
Quantity: 2
Spaces: Bookstore, Office
DIY EXHIBITION STAND
INSTALLATION
Price: *only charges material price/ manually
installed
Spaces: Interior & Exterior Gallery, Bookstore
MEKI 84” x 84” TRIPOD PROJECTOR
SCREEN
Price: RM398
Quantity: 3
Spaces: Activity Room
LCD MINI PICO PROJECTOR
Price: RM285
Quantity: 3
Spaces: Activity Room

9.3 FURNITURE LAYOUT
WASHROOM (L)
WASHROOM (G)
ACTIVITY ROOM
ACTIVITY ROOM ACTIVITY ROOM
OFFICE
BOOKSTORE
CAFETERIA
KITCHEN
LOBBY
GROUND FLOOR PLAN

INTERIOR GALLERY EXTERIOR GALLERY
FIRST FLOOR PLAN

9.4 LIGHTING FIXTURE PROPOSAL
SINGLE CIRCUIT TRACK
LIGHTING
Price: RM138
Quantity: 32
Spaces: Interior Gallery
CONTEMPORARY SQUARE
DECORATIVE RECESSED LIGHTING
Price: RM65
Quantity: 40
Spaces: Activity Room,
Kitchen
Price: RM430
Quantity: 1
Spaces: Foyer
THREE LIGHT FOYER
PENDANT
Integrated Tube Light
Fluorescent Lamp
Price: RM115
Quantity: 10
Spaces: Bookstore,
Office
ONE LIGHT PENDANT
Price: RM199
Quantity: 16
Spaces: Interior & Exterior
Gallery,
15W LED Outdoor
Underground Lamp Spot
Price: RM130.96
Quantity: 25
Spaces: Outdoor
Landscaping

9.5 FLOOR FINISHES PROPOSAL
TIMES SQUARE GREY
CONTRACT CARPET TILE
(NYLON TYPE LOOP)
Price: RM34.20/m2
Quantity: 211.6 m2
Spaces: Interior Gallery,
Office, Activity Room
KP90 HONEY MAPLE
KNIGHT TILE
(2mm x 4” x 36”)
Price: RM93.10/m2
Quantity: 132.25 m2
Spaces: Exterior Gallery,
Kitchen, Bookstore
PORTLAND STONE GRAY
CERAMIC FLOOR TILES
(18” x 18”)
Price: RM46.60/m2
USD 0.99/sqf
Quantity: 26.45 m2
Spaces: Washroom
GROUND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN

9.6 DOOR & WINDOW PROPOSAL
CONTEMPORARY WINDOWS & DOORS
The proposed types of windows and doors is similar to the early industrial style by using a variety of materials &
elements you might find in a factory, such as corrugated metal, concrete and exposed wood. This look has become
increasingly popular in urban settings nowadays.
COLOURS & FINISHES
Painted exterior finishes are most common in the Industrial Modern style. The colour range is quite varied and
includes dark colours. For interiors, maple with a clear coat finish is customary. However, other wood species
and stains, or painted wood, may also be used.

9.7 RENDERING VIEW
CAFETERIA & KITCHEN
INTERIOR GALLERY

EXTERIOR GALLERY
ACTIVITY ROOM

BOOKSTORE
MANAGEMENT OFFICE

10.1 MEETING AGENDAS
Ref: CONTENA PAVILION/PROJECT1/2017/CCM-1
MINUTES OF CLIENT CONSULTANT MEETING NO.1
AGENDA
PROPOSED CONTENA PAVILION AT NO.1 JALAN TAYLOR’S, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR D.E
FOR TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY SDN. BHD.
DATE : 5 APRIL 2017
TIME : 11AM-12PM
PLACE : E5, TAYLOR’S UNIVERITY, NO.1 JALAN TAYLOR’S, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR
CHAIRMAN : Ar. Goh Yen Nee
ATTENDEES :
1. Ar. Goh Yen Nee - ProjectManager
2. Ar. Siew John Loong - Architect
3. Ir. Lee Zu Jing - C&S Engineer
4. Ir. Kelvin Chiew - M&E Engineer
5. Sr. Ivan Ling - Quantity Surveyor
6. Ar.Kimberly Wong - Landscape Architect
7. Ar.Jerrie Kiew Wee Kee - Interior Designer
AGENDA ITEMS
NO. TOPIC PRESENTER
1 INTRODUCTION GYN
Greeting speech from chairman
2 EMPLOYEES INTRODUCTION GYN
Employees introducing based on their background & experiences
(company background)
3 PROJECT BRIEFING GYN
Briefing the requirement of design & site proposed
4 ARCHITECTURAL SJL
10.0 APPENDIX

Presentidea on how to design the pavilion
5 C & S ENGINEERING LZJ
Present the idea of structural on shipping container
6 M & E ENGINEERING KC
Presentidea of using solar energy to be the main electrical supplies
7 PROJECT PLANNING GYN
Present the schedule of works for each scope
8 Q&A SESSION GYN
Notes/Record for Consultant (During Meeting)
Prepared by: Verified by:
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager) (Ar. Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

AGENDA
DATE : 12 APRIL 2017
TIME : 11AM-12PM
CHAIRMAN : Ar. Siew John Loong
ATTENDEES :
AGENDA ITEMS
NO. TOPIC PRESENTER
1 INTRODUCTION SJL
Greeting speech from chairman
2 DESIGN PROPOSAL OF PAVILION SJL
Propose the conceptdesign of pavilion with precedentstudies under
consideration of programme, user, and views.
3 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM LZJ
Propose the type of foundation used that suitable for the site
4 SERVICES SYSTEM KC
Propose the type of air conditioning used
10.0 APPENDIX

5 INTERIOR THEME JK
Propose theme of interior area to express sense of space
6 LANDSCAPE THEME KW
Propose theme of landscaping for the pavilion
7 PROJECT PLANNING GYN
Present the schedule of works through Gantt chart
8 Q&A SESSION GYN
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Siew John Loong, Architect) (Ar. Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

AGENDA
TIME : 11AM-12PM
CHAIRMAN : Ar. Kimberly Wong
ATTENDEES :
AGENDA ITEMS
No TOPIC PRESENTER
1. INTRODUCTION KW
Greeting speech by chairman
2. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KW
Propose landscape layoutof pavilion based on selected for vegetation
landscape design
3. INTERIOR DESIGNER JK
Proposal for furniture and finishes layoutbased on the type of material
used
Development of research proposal on products documentation
4. ARCHITECT SJL
10.0 APPENDIX

Finalization of design container pavilion with setof drawings
5. CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LZJ
Propose suitable foundation systems and structural system based on
column and beams
6. MECHANICAL&ELECTRICAL ENGINEER KC
Propose electrical system for buildings
7. QUANTITY SURVEYOR IL
Propose costestimation for materials
8. Q&A SESSION GYN
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Kimberly Wong, Landscape Architect) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

AGENDA
TIME : 11AM-12.00PM
CHAIRMAN : Ir. Lee Zu Jing
ATTENDEES :
AGENDA ITEMS
No TOPIC PRESENTER
1. INTRODUCTION LZJ
Application of proposed foundation system and structural system on
latestdesign
3. ARCHITECT SJL
To brief about second finalized design pavilion with UBBL requirement.
10.0 APPENDIX

Finalize landscape design on latest pavilion design by architect
Proposal for furniture and finishes layoutbased on the type of material
used include type of door, window and lighting fixtures.
Update on electricity supply, water supply and sewerage system based on
updated pavilion design
Preliminary budget outline to specific consultant
8. PROJECT MANAGEMENT GYN
Updated Gantt Chart to be present
9. Q&A SESSION GYN
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ir. Lee Zu Jing, C&S Engineer) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

AGENDA OF CLIENT CONSULTANT MEETING NO.5
AGENDA
DATE : 3rd
MAY2017
TIME : 11AM-12.00PM
CHAIRMAN : Ir. Kelvin Chiew
ATTENDEES :
AGENDA ITEMS
No TOPIC PRESENTER
1. INTRODUCTION KC
Preparation of structural drawings based on updated design.
3. ARCHITECT SJL
Preparation of finalized pavilion design with submission drawings and
UBBL requirement.
10.0 APPENDIX

Finalized landscape design layout on latest pavilion design by architect.
Proposal of rendering layout for furniture and finishes with material with
lighting fixture.
Proposal of schematic drawings of suggested system based on finalized
design.
Finalized valued budgetfor each consultant.
8. PROJECT MANAGEMENT GYN
Finalized Gantt Chart & WBS to be presented.
9. Q&A SESSION GYN
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ir. Kelvin Chiew, M&E Engineer) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

10.2 MINUTES OF MEETING
RE: PROPOSED CONTENA PAVILION AT NO.1 JALAN TAYLOR’S, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR D.E FOR ALL IN 1
PAVILION SDN. BHD.
Venue: E5, Taylor’s University Date of Meeting: 5th
April 2017
Time of Meeting: 11am-12pm
Attendance Record & Contact Details- Persons Present.
No. Name Company/Position Ref. Telephone Fax/Email
1. Ar. Goh Yen Nee CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Project
Manager (PM)
GYN 012-12345678 gyn.creadev@gmail.com
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Architect
(AR)
SJL 016-23456789 sjl.creadev@gmail.com
3. Ir. Lee Zu Jing CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/C&S Engineer
(C&S)
LZJ 018-34567891 lzj.creadev@gmail.com
4. Ir. Kelvin Chiew CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/M&E Engineer
(M&E)
KC 013-45678912 kc.creadev@gmail.com
5. Sr. Ivan Lim CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity
Surveyor (QS)
IL 014-56789123 il.creadev@gmail.com
6. Ar.Kimberly Wong CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Landscape
Architect (AR)
KW 013-67891234 kw.creadev@gmail.com
7. Jerrie Kiew CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Interior
Designer (ID)
JK 017-78912345 jk.creadev@gmail.com
10.0 APPENDIX

ITEM PARTICULARS ACTIONS
1.0 GENERAL
The 1st
ClientConsultant Meeting was held on the 5th
April 2017 INFO
1.1 Meeting called by GYN at 11.00am INFO
1.2.0 Greeting Speech By Chairman and Introduction of Consultant INFO
1.2.1 Team members from CreaDev. Design Sdn. Bhd were officially introduced to clientby
ProjectManager, Goh Yen Nee
GYN
2..0 DESCRIPTION
2.1 Building budgetis notmentioned by client yet butdesign developmentstarted to be
prepared by architect.
2.2 CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
2.2.1 Civil engineering proposed using concrete and steel as main material. LZJ
2.2.2 Concrete can be the foundation of the building, stated by civil engineering.
2.2.3 Civil engineering also proposed to have some kind of foundation like the ‘rumah tinggi
which is builton the water surface.
2.3.1 Facilities like rainwater harvesting, solar panel and hydro pump are proposed by
mechanical and electrical engineering.
KC
2.3.2 Mechanical and electrical engineering proposed to save energy and resources to maximize
the building capability by using those facilities.
2.3.3 Mechanical and electrical engineering also started to suggest to put wires, cables and air-
conditioner at the corner of the building to avoid from seeing by visitor.
2.4 LANDSCAPING
2.4.1 Landscape architects proposed to have a green building design. KW
2.4.2 Courtyard furniture and types of plants are described by landscape architects as well.
2.4.3 Plants which are not taller than human heightare proposed as well to avoid from blocking
the view.
2.4.4 Landscape architect proposed to have greenery along the pathway and balcony if it is
possible.
2.5 INTERIOR DESIGN
2.5.1 Interior architect proposed to have different lighting in interior and exterior galleries to
create different atmosphere.
JK
2.5.2 Interior architect proposed to have complete interior finishing rather than having original
container look from the inside.
2.6 ARCHITECTURAL
2.6.1 Architect proposed to have 2 storeys building to accommodate the suitable amountof
people and activities.
SJL
10.0 APPENDIX

2.6.2 Architect proposed to allow passive ventilation as the main air ventilation of the building to
save energy.
2.6.3 A roof garden and a courtyard are proposed to have more greenery in the building.
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
3.1 No postponement matter INFO
Notes: Meeting will be held on 12th
April 2017.
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Siew John Loong, Architect) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

RE: PROPOSED CONTENA PAVILION AT NO.1 JALAN TAYLOR’S, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR
D.E FOR TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY SDN. BHD.
April 2017
Sdn.Bhd/ Project
Manager (PM)
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Architect
(AR)
(C&S)
(M&E)
5. Sr. Ivan Ling CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity
Surveyor (QS)
Sdn.Bhd/ Landscape
Architect (AR)
7. Ar. Jerrie Kiew CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Interior
Designer (ID)
10.0 APPENDIX

1.0 GENERAL
The 2ND
ClientConsultant Meeting was held on the 12TH
April 2017 INFO
1.1 Meeting called by SJL at 11.00am INFO
1.2.0 Confirmation of Minutes INFO
1.2.1 The meeting of CCM 1 on 5th
April 2017 was confirmed by SJL with correction.
Correction of the CCM1 :
1. Professional and correctguideline in minutes
2. Annotation and deadline to be added in the action
3. The necessary of detailed information from each position
4. Outcome and feedback from each position need to be written out
2.0 PROJECT COORDINATION
2.1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATTERS
2.1.1 Meeting was commenced by GYN under the CreaDev Design Sdn. Bhd.
Gantt Chart of work schedule for each position in this projectis setup and will be updating if
necessary for convenient works to each of the consultant. Organisation structure renovation
chartbased on the project is starting with pre-design stage till to the postdesign stage.
Success criteria which are cost, time, and scope becomes the guideline of the project to
provide a good quality outcome.
GYN
Deadline:
17/4/17
2.2.0 ARCHITECTURAL MATTERS
2.2.1 Design pavilion proposal was proposed by SJL. INFO
2.2.2 Listof programme, user group and orientation of container pavilion due to site selected
which produce specific views was proposed by SJL.
INFO
2.2.3 Circulation of the space to space was proposed by SJL INFO
2.2.4 A 3D model massing was showed for good understanding to consultants. INFO
2.2.5 The design proposal was proposed with a good starting idea butlack of workable method
with limit of space and circulation.
INFO
2.2.6 Feedback:
1. External larger platform for more circulation.
2. A larger container size to be considered
3. Setback for landscaping features
4. Position of windows need to be adjusted
SJL
Deadline:
20/4/17
2.2.7 Goals:
1. Size & heightof container need to be justified
2. Analyse the space requirementbased on the programme
3. UBBL for site boundaries and fire-fighting need to be checked.
SJL
10.0 APPENDIX

2.3.0 LANDSCAPING MATTERS
2.3.1 Type of vegetation such as mangrove tree which is grow in the water and cypress tress
which is fastgrowing to be proposed by KW
INFO
2.3.2 Idea of some suitable landscape design for outdoor was proposed by KW. INFO
2.3.3 Feedback:
1. A shorter vegetation is recommended to be the part of the landscaping features
and placed atsome attached pavilion.
2. Vegetation that is tropical and notgrow in the lakeside to avoid polluted.
3. Hardscape such as bench, pavement and artificial features to be considered.
KW
Deadline:
21/4/17
2.3.4 Goals:
1. Propose design layout vegetation thatis suitable for the specific environmentof
site
KW
2.4 INTERIOR DESIGNING MATTERS
2.4.1 Two ideas of interior design for the container pavilion was proposed by JK which are the
modern industrial style and Scandinavian style.
INFO
2.4.2 The idea A which is modern industrial style that related with exposed elements and bold to be
explained by JK
INFO
2.4.3 The proposal of idea B which is Scandinavian style based on simplicity with soft color and use
of earthy muted tones natural materials is recommended by JK
INFO
2.4.4 Goals:
1. Propose a furniture, fitting and materials layout that is suitable for the pavilion.
2. More research on products documentation to be done.
JK
Deadline:
20/4/17
2.5 CIVIL & STRUCTURAL MATTERS
2.5.1 Supporting structure to be recommended for the cantilever container INFO
INFO
2.5.2 Concrete foundation to be proposed by LZJ for the pavilion container INFO
2.5.3 Size and type of container presented by LZJ for suggestion to SJL
2.5.4 Goals:
1. Propose more detailed foundation elements to the pavilion related with water body.
2. Type of structural elements such as beam and column to be proposed.
LZJ
Deadline:
19/4/17
2.6 MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL MATTERS
2.6.1 Suggestion on operable window to the pavilion by KC during the comments to SJL design
proposal
INFO
2.6.2 Proposal of ventilation system such as ceiling fan (primary ventilation) and cassette air
conditioner type (secondary ventilation) as the central ventilation to the pavilion where is
splitunit type presented by KC.
INFO
2.6.3 Proposal of sewerage system based on type of piping which is UPVC pipe, water tank size and
rain harvesting system proposed by KC.
INFO
2.6.4 Goals:
1. Justify the water supply system with sanitary appliances and rain harvesting
system.
KC
Deadline:
20/4/17

2. Analyze the ventilation system based on the type of air conditioning used
3. Propose the electrical system which supply for the electrical appliances to the
pavilion
2.7 QUANTITY SURVEYING MATTERS
2.7.1 Costbudget for this projectis received and presented by IL for consultants to be reference
during projectplanning which is RM50000
INFO
2.7.2 Goals:
Propose an estimation of costfor this projectpavilion based on the budget received.
IL
Dateline:
20/4/17
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
April 2017.
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Kimberly Wong, Landscape Architect) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

April 2017
Sdn.Bhd/ Project
Manager (PM)
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Architect
(AR)
(C&S)
(M&E)
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity
Surveyor (QS)
Sdn.Bhd/ Landscape
Architect (AR)
Sdn.Bhd/ Interior
Designer (ID)
10.0 APPENDIX

1.0 GENERAL
The 3rd
Client Consultant Meeting was held on the 19TH
April 2017 INFO
1.1 Meeting called by KW at 11.00am INFO
1.2.0 Confirmation of Minutes INFO
1.2.1 The meeting of CCM 1 on 5th
April 2017 was confirmed by SJL with correction.
Correction of the CCM1 :
5. Professional and correctguideline in minutes
6. Annotation and deadline to be added in the action
7. The necessary of detailed information from each position
8. Outcome and feedback from each position need to be written out
2.1.1 Gantt Chart of work scheduling need to be redefine and updated due to the some error
during pavilion design.
GYN
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.2.1 Second design development proposed by SJL INFO
2.2.2 Minor changes on the container size explained by SJL
2.2.3 Building layout and space had been finalized by SJL.
2.2.2 Feedback:
5. To determine container model that will be used
6. To amend interior spaces
SJL
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.2.3 Goals:
4. To finalize building design and spaces
5. To include interior dry wall to improve interior aesthetics
6. UBBL for pavilion design need to be re-check.
SJL
2.3.1 Vegetation which has constant growth upwards and with easy maintenances was proposed
by KW
INFO
2.3.2 ‘Juniper Iowa tree’ which is neatand has a small footprint was proposed by KW INFO
2.3.3 ‘Dwarf Artic Willow tree’ which has low maintenance and comes in human height was
proposed by KW
2.3.4 Feedback:
4. To reduce proposed vegetation
5. To include exterior furniture e.g. bench and table
6. To remove rooftop garden
KW
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.3.5 Goals:
2. To propose the planting of grass on ground floor
3. To provide QS the estimate costs of vegetation
KW
10.0 APPENDIX

2.4.1 JK was absentduring meeting. INFO
2.4.2 Goals:
3. To proceed with the goals discussed during previous meeting
JK
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.5.1 Foundation system with pile footing and concrete platform was determined by LZJ INFO
INFO
2.5.2 Building structural system was determined by LZJ INFO
2.5.3 Goals:
3. Apply proposed foundation and building structural system to the updated building
design
LZJ
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.6.1 Ceiling fan to be removed upon decision by KC INFO
2.6.2 Rainwater harvesting system is not to be used as itis notefficient for current project INFO
2.6.3 Electricity supply was proposed while the use of LED lightbulbs was mentioned by KC INFO
2.6.4 PVC gutter, rainwater downpipe and perimeter drain were proposed by KC
2.6.5 Goals:
4. To include exterior lighting
5. To propose toilet water supply and sewerage system
KC
Deadline:
25/4/17
2.7.1 Container price was mentioned during meeting by IL INFO
2.7.2 Used container were proposed to be used to achieve building sustainability & costsaving
2.7.3 Goals:
1. QS to allocate proper costbudget for Architect, Landscape Architect, Interior
Designer, C&S Engineer and M&E Engineer
IL
Dateline:
25/4/17
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
April 2017 in E5 studio, Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus at 11.00-12.00pm. Copies
of minutes CCM 3 have been emailed to all consultants before next meeting.
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ir. Lee Zu Jing, C&S Engineer) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

April 2017
Sdn.Bhd/ Project
Manager (PM)
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Architect
(AR)
(C&S)
(M&E)
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity
Surveyor (QS)
Sdn.Bhd/ Landscape
Architect (AR)
Sdn.Bhd/ Interior
Designer (ID)
10.0 APPENDIX

1.0 GENERAL
The 4th
Client Consultant Meeting was held on the 26TH
April 2017 INFO
1.1 Meeting called by LZJ at 11.00am INFO
2.1.1 Gantt Chart of work scheduling need to be redefine due to the some error during pavilion
design.
2.2.2 Work Breakdown System (WBS) need to be done by GYN GYN
Deadline:
3/5/17
2.2.1 Final Design proposed by SJL based on C&S requirement. INFO
2.2.2 Railing & Roof extension proposed by SJL. INFO
2.2.3 Concrete Wall proposed on ground floor by SJL to replace metal container wall. INFO
2.2.4 Feedback:
1. To amend the size of roof and column with material changes.
2. To re-amend concrete wall on ground floor suggested by C&S.
3. To relocate staircase based on C&S column structure.
SJL:
Deadline:
3/5/17
2.2.5 Goals
1. To proposed an area for M&E on first floor.
2. To proposed finalised interior wall with finishes.
3. To proposed extension of cafeteria.
SJL
2.3.1 Wooden benches and natural grass maton ground floor entrance were proposed by KW. INFO
2.3.2 Natural grass mat with ’Juniper Lowa Tree’ were proposed by KW on first floor to cover M&E
section.
INFO
2.3.3 Estimated cost with costbreakdown for QS was proposed by KW. INFO
2.3.4 Feedback:
1. To reduce footprint/remove grass maton first floor.
KW
Deadline:
3/5/17
2.3.5 Goals:
1. To re-estimate costof vegetation based on no. of productused/budget to QS.
2. To finalize type of product used.
KW
2.4.1 DIY furniture and carpet finishes for gallery spaces were proposed by JK. INFO
2.4.2 Wood material and ceramic tiles were proposed by JK for exterior spaces and toilet
respectively.
INFO
2.4.3 Goals:
1. To produce interior renderings based on proposed materials for project.
2. Finalized the layout furniture and lighting fixture
JK
Deadline:
3/5/17
10.0 APPENDIX

2.5.1 Foundation system with pile footing was predetermined by LZJ based on updated design
changes.
INFO
2.5.2 Square section steel column structure was predetermined and by LZJ. INFO
2.5.3 Selection of platform materials to reduce costs to IL INFO
2.5.3 Goals:
1. To predetermine ground platform thickness.
2. To propose staircase supportstructure.
LZJ
Deadline:
3/5/17
2.6.1 Fire protection system was proposed by KC. INFO
2.6.2 Material changes on piping was decided by KC based on updated design changes.
2.6.3 Location of water supply tank was proposed by KC based on extension of cafeteria. INFO
2.6.4 Feedback:
1. To amend water piping, ducting and electrical wiring in updated design.
KC
Deadline:
3/5/17
2.6.5 Goals:
1. To produce detail schematic system drawing based on UBBL requirements on
updated design.
KC
2.7.1 Costestimation for respective party was predetermined by IL. INFO
2.7.2 Feedback:
1. To predetermine costmaterials especially structural part.
2. Estimation costaccurately on different sector to avoid over budget.
2.7.3 Goals:
2. Finalize proper costbudget for Architect, Landscape Architect, Interior Designer,
C&S Engineer and M&E Engineer due to materials used
IL
Deadline:
3/5/17
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
Notes: Meeting will be held on 3RD
May2017 in E5 studio, Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus at 11.00-12.00pm. Copies
of minutes CCM 4 have been emailed to all consultants before next meeting.
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ir. Kelvin Chiew, M&E Engineer) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

Venue: E5, Taylor’s University Date of Meeting: 03rd
May 2017
Sdn.Bhd/ Project
Manager (PM)
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design
Sdn.Bhd/ Architect
(AR)
(C&S)
(M&E)
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity
Surveyor (QS)
Sdn.Bhd/ Landscape
Architect (AR)
Sdn.Bhd/ Interior
Designer (ID)
10.0 APPENDIX

Ref: CONTENA PAVILION/PROJECT1/2017/CCM-5 CreaDev.Design SDN. BHD
MINUTES OF CLIENT CONSULTANT MEETING NO.5 Company No: 123456-T
1.0 GENERAL
The 5th
ClientConsultant Meeting was held on the 03rd
May 2017 INFO
1.1 Meeting called by IL at 11.00am INFO
2.1.1 Presented the latest updated Gantt Chart based on the work performance from each
consultant.
INFO
2.2.2 Finalized Work Breakdown Structure presented. INFO
2.2.3 Feedback:
1. To rework on the WBS based on different phases of the pavilion design project.
GYN
Deadline:
10/5/17
2.2.1 Final Design proposed by SJL based on UBBL requirement. INFO
2.2.2 Submission drawings distributed to each consultants and briefly explained. INFO
2.2.3 Goals:
1. To proceed the submission drawings to tender stage.
2. Produce complete sets of tender drawings based on the latestamended design.
3. Produce perspective renderings on the overall pavilion design in response to the
site.
SJL:
Deadline:
10/5/17
2.3.1 Presented finalized landscape design layout based on latestupdated design. INFO
2.3.2 Goals:
1. To produce final exterior landscape renderings based on latest design.
2. To collaborate with Architect & Interior Designer regarding 3D rendering matters.
KW
Deadline:
10/5/17
2.4.1 Proposed furniture layout. INFO
2.4.2 Draft rendering of interior spaces presented. INFO
2.4.3 Goals:
3. To produce final interior renderings based on proposed materials for project.
JK
Deadline:
10/5/17
2.5.1 Presented structural drawings of the project based on the latest updated design. INFO
2.5.2 Goals:
3. To collaborate with QS regarding the overestimated budget on building structures.
4. To reduce no. of pilings provided under the concrete platform for cost reduction.
LZJ
Deadline:
10/5/17

2.6.1 KC was absentduring CCM05. INFO
2.6.2 Goals:
1. To produce final plans & schematic drawings of each system proposed based on the
latestamended design.
KC
Deadline:
10/5/17
2.7.1 Presented the finalized valued budgetfor each consultant. INFO
2.7.2 Proposed IBS Platform to replace normal concrete platform for projectcostreduction. INFO
2.7.3 Feedback:
3. To redetermine the costof IBS Platform
4. To reconfirm with the pricing of roofing materials.
INFO
2.7.4 Goals:
3. QS to finalize proper costbudget for Architect, Landscape Architect, Interior
Designer, C&S Engineer and M&E Engineer.
IL
Deadline:
10/5/17
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
Notes: Client-Consultant Meeting 05 is the lastmeeting held. Copies of minutes have been emailed to all consultants
before projecthandover.
……………………………. …………………………….
(Ar. Jerrie Kiew, Interior Designer) (Ar.Goh Yen Nee, P.Manager)

10.3 ATTENDANCES RECORD
RE: PROPOSED CONTENA PAVILION AT NO.1 JALAN TAYLOR’S, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR D.E FOR
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY SDN. BHD.
April 2017
ATTENDANCE RECORD AND CONTACT DETAILS- PERSONS PRESENT
No. Name Company/Position Phone No. Fax/Email Signature
1. Ar. Goh Yen Nee CreaDev Design Sdn.Bhd/
ProjectManager (PM)
012-12345678 gyn.creadev@gmail.c
om
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
CreaDev Design Sdn.Bhd/
Architect (AR)
016-23456789 sjl.creadev@gmail.co
m
(C&S)
018-34567891 lzj.creadev@gmail.co
m
(M&E)
013-45678912 kc.creadev@gmail.co
m
Sdn.Bhd/Quantity Surveyor
(QS)
014-56789123 il.creadev@gmail.co
m
6. Ar.Kimberly Wong CreaDev Design Sdn.Bhd/
Landscape Architect (AR)
013-67891234 kw.creadev@gmail.co
m
7. Ar. Jerrie Kiew CreaDev Design Sdn.Bhd/
Interior Designer (ID)
017-78912345 jk.creadev@gmail.co
m
8.
9.
10.
10.0 APPENDIX

April 2017
ProjectManager (PM)
om
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
Architect (AR)
m
(C&S)
m
(M&E)
m
(QS)
m
m
m
8.
9.
10.
10.0 APPENDIX

Venue: E5, Taylor’s University Date of Meeting: 3rd
May 2017
ProjectManager (PM)
om
2. Ar. Siew John
Loong
Architect (AR)
m
(C&S)
m
(M&E)
m
(QS)
m
m
m
8.
9.
10.
10.0 APPENDIX

 http://www.designboom.com/architecture/north-arrow-studio-shipping-containers-stacked-bar-texas-05-
19-2014/
 https://app.smartsheet.com/b/home
 https://programsuccess.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/scope-time-and-cost-managing-the-triple-
constraint/
 http://www.b4ubuild.com/resources/schedule/6kproj.shtml
 http://www.project-management-skills.com/critical-path-method.html
 http://www.brighthubpm.com/project-planning/49584-example-of-using-the-critical-path-method-or-the-
critical-path-analysis/
 https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/owm0307.pdf
11.0 REFERENCES

1 final-complete-pm

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to 1 final-complete-pm

Similar to 1 final-complete-pm (20)

More from Siew John Loong

More from Siew John Loong (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

1 final-complete-pm