Check this A+ tutorial guideline at https://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy For more classes visit http://www.uopassignments.com

1. Argosy FP 6500 All Assignments NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-all-assignments-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP 6500 All Assignments NEW
FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 2 Ethical Guidelines
NEW
FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps in
Ethical Decision Making NEW
FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1 Adversarial Legal
System NEW
FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 2 Case Analysis NEW

2. FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to
Confidentiality NEW
FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 2 Case Analysis
Ethical and Professional Conflicts in Correctional
Psychology NEW
FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney Tactics
NEW
FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 2 Critical Evaluation
of Court Case Commonwealth of Virginia v Allen
NEW
FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing Ethical
Dilemmas NEW
FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 2 LASA Therapeutic
and Forensic Roles NEW

3. Argosy FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 2 Ethical
Guidelines NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-1-assignment-2-
ethical-guidelines-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 2 Ethical Guidelines
NEW

4. Argosy FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps
in Ethical Decision Making NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-1-assignment-3-eight-
steps-in-ethical-decision-making-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps in
Ethical Decision Making NEW

5. Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1
Adversarial Legal System NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-2-assignment-1-
adversarial-legal-system-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1 Adversarial Legal
System NEW

6. Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 2 Case
Analysis NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-2-assignment-2-case-
analysis-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
You have a friend who is a mental health
practitioner. He or she was invited to attend the
bar mitzvah of a thirteen-year-old child he or she
is treating. After considering the offer, he or she
decides to go but has asked for your advice.
Tasks:
In a 2- to 3-page paper and using appropriate
ethical guidelines, answer the following questions:

7. What would you recommend and why?
Would your recommendations differ if the therapy
had concluded?
Would your recommendations differ depending on
the type of mental health professional involved? If
yes, in what way? If no, why not?
Support your recommended actions with
appropriate professional ethical guidelines and
laws of your region. Additionally, cite all
supporting ideas. Finally, your submission should
be written and formatted in current APA style.

8. Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to
Confidentiality NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-3-assignment-1-limits-
to-confidentiality-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to
Confidentiality NEW

9. Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 2 Case
Analysis Ethical and Professional Conflicts in
Correctional Psychology NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-3-assignment-2-case-
analysis-ethical-and-professional-conflicts-in-
correctional-psychology-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
In this assignment, you will discuss the issues
pertaining to informed consent in conducting
evaluations and apply ethical decision making to a
scenario in which there is a professional ethical
conflict.
Tasks:
Review vignette 3 from the following article:
Ethical and Professional Conflicts in Correctional
Psychology

10. After you have read the vignette, answer the
following questions in a 2- to 3-page paper:
Should the evaluation, which is requested by the
warden, be completed? Why or why not?
Would your answer change if the psychologist
were not a member of APA? Why or why not?
Support your answers with appropriate references
in APA style.
Submission Details:
Save your paper as
M3_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc. By Module 3, Day
7, post it to the M3 Assignment 2 RA Dropbox.

11. Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney
Tactics NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-4-assignment-1-
attorney-tactics-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney Tactics
NEW

12. Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 2 Critical
Evaluation of Court Case Commonwealth of
Virginia v Allen NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-4-assignment-2-
critical-evaluation-of-court-case-
commonwealth-of-virginia-v-allen-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
It is important to understand the impact an expert
testimony may have in the ultimate decision made
by a court. In addition, it is helpful for
practitioners of forensic psychology to be able to
read and understand legal cases.
Tasks:
Click here to review the case Commonwealth of
Virginia v. Allen (2005).
The case describes an appellate legal opinion or
court decision involving expert witness testimony.
When a case is appealed, it goes to an appellate or
to a higher court. The appellate court then reviews

13. the findings of the lower court, which in this case
was the trial court. The appellate court offered the
following two opinions:
The first opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v.
Allen, 2005, pp. 1–24) is the majority opinion and
is the one that counts.
The second opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v.
Allen, 2005, pp. 24–31) is an opinion filed by a
minority of judges who concurred (agreed) in part
and dissented (disagreed) in part with the
majority of the judges who ruled.
After reading the appellate legal opinion, write a
2- to 3-page paper addressing the following:
Discuss whether either of the expert witnesses in
this case acted unethically. Support your opinion
with the relevant APA or specialty ethical
guidelines.
Indicate whether you agree with the majority
decision or the minority concurring or dissenting
opinion. Explain why.
The paper should be in APA style.
Reference:

14. Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 609 S.E.2d 4
(Va. 2005).

15. Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing
Ethical Dilemmas NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-5-assignment-1-
addressing-ethical-dilemmas-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing Ethical
Dilemmas NEW

16. Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 2 LASA
Therapeutic and Forensic Roles NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-
argosy/fp6500-module-5-assignment-2-lasa-
therapeutic-and-forensic-roles-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
For many years, the ethical dilemma of playing
both a therapeutic role and a forensic role has
been debated in the literature. Some authorities
argue that there is always a conflict of interest in
such dual relationships, while other authorities
argue that the two roles can be reconciled and
impartiality can be maintained. Using the Argosy
University online library resources and the
Internet, locate at least ten articles that discuss the
therapeutic role and the forensic role and take a
stance on this particular debate. Make sure that
your collection of articles is balanced with regard
to the roles and the viewpoints.
Tasks:

17. Utilize the ethical decision-making process you
learned about in M1 Assignment 3 to create a 7- to
8-page argumentative paper supporting your
stand. In other words, in a reasoned fashion,
develop an argument for whether the two roles—
therapeutic and forensic—can ethically coincide.
The course paper is essentially an argumentative
essay. Refer to the following for guidelines on
writing argumentative essays:
Writing Argumentative Essays Tutorial: Contents
Types of Papers: Argument/Argumentative
Ensure that you follow the following instructions:
Using multiple sources, defend your thesis on how
and why therapeutic and forensic roles can or
cannot be reconciled.
Ensure that you argue for a particular side of the
issue (not arguing both sides) and that your
argument is well-supported by scholarly
literature, professional ethical guidelines, and the
law.
Include solid reasoning and a compelling thesis.
Remember, a strong argument always supports its
ideas and proves the other side wrong. Make sure
to both support your views with credible

18. arguments and sources and to also refute the other
side.
Use proper grammar and spelling. Additionally,
the paper should be written and formatted in APA
style.