2. The Basics
2006 Regulations are the most relevant source for
the law
Defined as a transfer of an economic entity that
retains its identity
Does not apply to share sales
Any attempt to contract out of it is void
3. Factors to Consider
The type of undertaking being transferred
whether any tangible assets are being transferred
whether any intangible assets are transferred
whether the majority of the employees are taken on
whether any customers are transferred
the degree of similarity between the activities
carried on before and after the transfer;
the period for which the activities were suspended
4. 2006 Legislation Introduces...
Clarity as to when TUPE applies
Clarification of the effect of legislation
to transfer related dismissals
Notification Requirements
greater flexibility for insolvency cases
5. Duty to Provide Information
Age and identity of employee
Contract of Employment
Disciplinary Records
Grievance Records
Tribunal Claims
Collective Agreements
Fine of up to £5000 for non-disclosure
6. Which Other Information
Policy Reason:
‘equivalent contractual safeguards’
No Further legal guidance on what you
can and cannot ask for
No legal guidance as to provision of the
information
7. Timeframes
“Employee liability information shall contain
information as at a specified date not more
than fourteen days before the date on which
the information is notified to the transferee.”
“long enough before a relevant transfer to
enable the employer of any affected
employees to consult the appropriate
representatives of any affected employees...”
Cable Realisations Ltd v GMB Northern, EAT
8. Employee's Existing Benefits
They will only transfer if it is an existing
contractual benefit
Are they deemed to be part of the
contract of employment?
Is it an express or implied term?
If implied, is it reasonable to imply it?
9. New Company Benefits
Basic ethos is to preserve their contract
Beyond that, you can be as generous
as you like!
Equal pay
- Gutridge and ors v Sodexo and anor, CA
-Skills Development Scotland Co Ltd v
Buchanan and anor, EAT
11. Pensions (Options)
Final Salary or Career Average
the benefits are equivalent to the level of the
Reference Scheme Test
the value of benefits provided are at least 6% of
pensionable pay for each year of employment
employer matches employee contributions of up
to 6% of basic pay
12. Pensions (Options)
money purchase scheme in which the employer
matches employee contributions of up to 6% of
basic pay
Stakeholder Scheme in which the employer
matches employee contributions of up to 6% of
basic pay
Doesn't need to match other employees
Doesn't apply to people who have turned it down
13. Pensions (Non Occupational)
The obligation only transfers if the
previous employer had a contractual
obligation to contribute
The regulations do not otherwise apply
to you
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim
In the former case, it stated that the equal pay claim must have been in existance at the time of the transfer. The transferee has no obligation to put you on better benefits than you were enjoying before. There is a time llmit of 6 months from the date of transfer I would still advise you to be careful in the long run In the second case, preserving an employees TUPE rights, 2 years on, was a valid defence to an equal pay claim