The Philippine Bill of Rights: Civil Rightsbrianbelen
Lecture slides for an undergraduate class on Philippine Politics and Governance I taught between 2003 and 2005.
This is the first of two slides dealing with the Bill of Rights enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The slides specifically cover civil rights.
These slides were prepared using Powerpoint XP.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://brianbelen.blogspot.com
http://brianbelen.wordpress.com
The Philippine Bill of Rights: Civil Rightsbrianbelen
Lecture slides for an undergraduate class on Philippine Politics and Governance I taught between 2003 and 2005.
This is the first of two slides dealing with the Bill of Rights enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The slides specifically cover civil rights.
These slides were prepared using Powerpoint XP.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://brianbelen.blogspot.com
http://brianbelen.wordpress.com
Causal Comparative Research At least two different groups are compared on a dependent variable or measure of performance (called the “effect”) because the independent variable (called the “cause”) has already occurred or cannot be manipulated. Dependent variable-the change or difference occurring as a result of the independent variable. Independent variable- an activity of characteristic believed to make a difference with respect to some behavior.
The Philippine Bill of Rights: Political and Legal Rightsbrianbelen
Lecture slides for an undergraduate class on Philippine Politics and Governance I taught between 2003 and 2005.
This is the second of two slides dealing with the Bill of Rights enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. In particular, these slides cover the legal and political rights guaranteed by the supreme law of the land.
These slides were prepared using Powerpoint XP.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://brianbelen.blogspot.com
http://brianbelen.wordpress.com
Explanation and Summary of Legislative Department in Article VI of the Philippine Constitution.
Reference Book: Philippine Governance and the 1987 Constitution
Revised multimedia presentation with audioDcraig1010
Slide presentation on the Bill of Rights for Franciscan University of Steubenville - EDU 536: Instructional Materials and Web Based Instructional Design - created by Dennis Craig
The following TrueFalse and Multiple Choice questions cover the m.docxoreo10
The following True/False and Multiple Choice questions cover the material introduced in Chapters 1-2; 4, 6, and 7-8. Each question is worth two (2) points. Please indicate (T) for True or (F) for False for the True/False Statements. For Multiple Choice, please select the letter that corresponds to the best response. There are 50 questions in this section. This section is worth 50 points.
A. LEGAL SYTSTEM, COURTS, AND LEGISLATION
1. All but which of the following are examples of special courts in the federal system: a. U.S. Tax Court
b. U.S. Bankruptcy Court
c. U.S. Court of Federal Claims
d. Pierce County Superior Court
e. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
2. Which of the following statements IS NOT true as it relates to the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court? a. The U.S. Supreme Court is the final authority on all matters of federal jurisdiction.
b. The primary function of the Supreme Court is one of review.
c. The key element in the Supreme Court’s authority is that a federal issue must be at stake, either in the form of the parties (diversity jurisdiction) or in the constitutionality of a state or federal law.
d. Every case may be submitted to the United States Supreme Court for review.
e. All of the above statements are true.
3. Judicial review refers to the system by which each branch of government can use its specially designated powers to make sure the other branches act within their constitutionally prescribed limits.
4. The principle of stare decisis precludes the court from correcting erroneous decisions that were previously issued.
B. INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL PROCEDURE (LECTURE)
5. The party responding to a civil action has the initial burden of proof.
6. Equity law is the body of law developed by the courts that serves as precedent for the determination of later controversies.
7. Quasi-in-rem jurisdiction refers to the ability of a court to exercise jurisdiction over a person involved in litigation in the state in which the court is situated.
8. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the authority of a particular court to hear a matter. If the court does not have proper subject matter jurisdiction, the judgment rendered is void.
9. Where there is diversity of the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, the plaintiff may file his action in state court and only upon agreement of the other party, can it be removed to federal court.
10.Under the due process clause, a Washington court may not assert personal jurisdiction over a person unless:
a. The person is given adequate notice
b. The person is given an opportunity to be heard
c. The person has had “minimum contacts” with the forum state
d. A, B, & C
e. A & B
11.The doctrine of preemption precludes states from making laws on matters for which another state has already created regulations.
12.Which of the following is a remedy that can be obtained from a court of equity?
a. A maxim
b. Specific performance
c ...
This PowerPoint details the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and explains the rights and privileges that are granted to citizens, protecting them from expansive government power.
SECTION IIntroduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor A.docxzenobiakeeney
SECTION I
Introduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor: A. Jarmon
The following True/False and Multiple Choice questions cover the material introduced in Chapters 1-2; 4, 6, and 7-8. Each question is worth two (2) points. Please indicate (T) for True or (F) for False for the True/False Statements. For Multiple Choice, please select the letter that corresponds to the best response. There are 50 questions in this section. This section is worth 50 points.
A. LEGAL SYTSTEM, COURTS, AND LEGISLATION
All but which of the following are examples of special courts in the federal system:
a. U.S.TaxCourt
b. U.S. Bankruptcy Court
c. U.S.CourtofFederalClaims
d. Pierce County Superior Court
e. U.S.CourtofAppealsfortheArmedForces
Which of the following statements IS NOT true as it relates to the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court?
TheU.S.SupremeCourtisthefinalauthorityonallmattersoffederal jurisdiction.
The primary function of the Supreme Court is one of review.
The key element in the Supreme Court’s authority is that a federal issue must be at stake, either in the form of the parties (diversity
jurisdiction) or in the constitutionality of a state or federal law.
Every case may be submitted to the United States Supreme Court for
review.
Alloftheabovestatementsaretrue.
Judicial review refers to the system by which each branch of government can use its specially designated powers to make sure the other branches act within their constitutionally prescribed limits.
The principle of stare decisis precludes the court from correcting erroneous decisions that were previously issued.
Final Exam Page 2
Introduction to Law Final Exam Instructions Instructor: A. Jarmon
B. INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL PROCEDURE (LECTURE)
The party responding to a civil action has the initial burden of proof.
Equity law is the body of law developed by the courts that serves as precedent for the determination of later controversies.
Quasi-in-rem jurisdiction refers to the ability of a court to exercise jurisdiction over a person involved in litigation in the state in which the court is situated.
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the authority of a particular court to hear a matter. If the court does not have proper subject matter jurisdiction, the judgment rendered is void.
Where there is diversity of the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, the plaintiff may file his action in state court and only upon agreement of the other party, can it be removed to federal court.
10.Under the due process clause, a Washington court may not assert personal jurisdiction over a person unless:
a. Thepersonisgivenadequatenotice
b. The person is given an opportunity to be heard
c. Thepersonhashad“minimumcontacts”withtheforumstate d. A,B,&C
e. A&B
11.The doctrine of preemption precludes states from making laws on matters for which another state has already created regulations.
12.Which of the following is a remedy that can be obtained from a court of
equity?a. Amaxim
b. Speci.
1. CHAPTER 20
Due Process of Law
• How is the meaning of due process of law set out
in the 5th and 14th amendments?
• What is police power and how does it relate to
civil rights?
• What is the right of privacy and where are its
origins in constitutional law?
3. CHAPTER 20
The 5th and 14th Amendments
• The 5th Amendment provides that “no person … shall be
deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of
law…”.
• The 14th Amendment extends that restriction to State and local
governments.
• Due process means that the government must act fairly and in
accord with established rules at all times.
• Due process is broken down into two branches:
– Substantive due process—the fairness of the laws
themselves
– Procedural due process—the fairness of the procedures
used to enforce the laws
4. CHAPTER 20
The Police Power
To promote health:
• States can limit the sale of alcohol and tobacco, make laws to
combat pollution, and require vaccination of school children.
To promote safety:
• States can forbid concealed weapons, require the use of seatbelts,
and punish drunk drivers.
To promote morals:
• States can outlaw gambling, the sale of obscene goods, and
prostitution.
To promote the general welfare:
• States can enact compulsory education laws, provide to the
needy, and limit profits of utilities.
The police power is the authority of each State to act to safeguard the
well-being of its people
5. CHAPTER 20
The Right to Privacy
The constitutional guarantees of due process create a right of
privacy.
• Established in Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965, which held that a
law outlawing birth-control was unconstitutional.
• In Stanley v. Georgia, 1969, the right of privacy was defined as
“the right to be free, except in very limited circumstances, from
unwanted governmental intrusion into one’s privacy.”
The right of privacy provoked controversy when it was applied to a
woman’s right to an abortion, beginning with Roe v.Wade in 1973.
6. CHAPTER 20
Section 1 Assessment
1. Due process is broken down into substantive due process and
(a) policing due process.
(b) private due process.
(c) State-regulated due process.
(d) procedural due process.
2. The police power is the authority of each State to
(a) arrest its citizens.
(b) hire a police force.
(c) protect and promote the public health and general welfare.
(d) restrictions on alcohol and tobacco.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
7. CHAPTER 20
Section 1 Assessment
1. Due process is broken down into substantive due process and
(a) policing due process.
(b) private due process.
(c) State-regulated due process.
(d) procedural due process.
2. The police power is the authority of each State to
(a) arrest its citizens.
(b) hire a police force.
(c) protect and promote the public health and general welfare.
(d) restrictions on alcohol and tobacco.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
8. CHAPTER 20
Freedom and Security of the Person
• Which Supreme Court cases have dealt with
slavery and involuntary servitude?
• What is the intent of the 2nd Amendment’s
protection of the right to keep and bear arms, and
how is it applied?
• What constitutional provisions are designed to
guarantee the security of home and person?
9. CHAPTER 20
Slavery and Involuntary Servitude
• The 13th Amendment, ratified in 1865, ended slavery in this
country. It also protects against involuntary servitude, or forced
labor.
– Neither the draft nor imprisonment can be classified as
involuntary servitude.
• Unlike any other part of the Constitution, the 13th Amendment
covers the actions of private individuals as well as that of the
government.
10. CHAPTER 20
The 13th Amendment in Action
• For a long time after it was passed, both citizens and members of
the Supreme Court thought that the 13th Amendment did not
apply to acts of racial discrimination committed by private
citizens. After all, the discriminatory acts were social choices and
did not reinstitute slavery. According to this theory, Congress did
not have the power to act against private parties who practiced
discrimination.
• Starting in 1968, the Supreme Court breathed new life into the
13th Amendment by upholding provisions in the Civil Rights Act
of 1866, a little-known law that had escaped repeal in the late
1800s. In a series of landmark cases, the Supreme Court found
that private citizens could not practice racial discrimination to
exclude people on the basis of their color. They also expanded the
law to include any group subject to discrimination based on their
ethnicity.
11. CHAPTER 20
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms
• The 2nd Amendment protects the right of each State to form and
keep a militia.
• Many believe that the 2nd Amendment also sets out an individual
right to keep and bear arms.
• The Supreme Court has tried only one important 2nd Amendment
Case, United States v. Miller, 1939. The case involved a section of
the National Firearms Act of 1934 that forbid shipping sawed-off
shotguns, silencers, and machine guns across State lines without
informing the Treasury Department and paying a tax. The Court
upheld the provision.
• The 2nd Amendment has as yet not been extended to each State
under the 14th Amendment. Therefore, the individual States have
the right to regulate arms in their own ways.
12. CHAPTER 20
Security of Home and Person
• The 3rd and 4th Amendments protect the
security of home and person.
• The 4th Amendment protects against writs of
assistance (blanket search warrants) and
“unreasonable searches and seizures.” It is
extended to the States through the 14th
Amendment.
13. CHAPTER 20
Aspects of the 4th Amendment
Probable Cause
• To search a premise, in most cases, a warrant must be obtained on a
reasonable suspicion of a crime
Arrests
• To arrest a person—a police officer needs only probable cause
Automobiles
• Police officers do not always need search warrants to search an
automobile
The Exclusionary Rule
• Evidence gained as a result of an illegal search cannot be used in court
Wiretapping
• Unless police officers have a warrant, tapping phone calls is not legal
Drug Testing
• Drug testing can be conducted without a warrant or probable cause
14. CHAPTER 20
Section 2 Assessment
1. When did the 13th Amendment begin to be enforce laws against racial
discrimination by private citizens?
(a) 1791
(b) 1865
(c) 1866
(d) 1968
2. The 3rd Amendment forbids
(a) new taxes.
(b) housing soldiers in private homes.
(c) new colonies in the Americas.
(d) all of the above.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
15. CHAPTER 20
Section 2 Assessment
1. When did the 13th Amendment begin to be enforce laws against racial
discrimination by private citizens?
(a) 1791
(b) 1865
(c) 1866
(d) 1968
2. The 3rd Amendment forbids
(a) new taxes.
(b) housing soldiers in private homes.
(c) new colonies in the Americas.
(d) all of the above.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
16. CHAPTER 20
Rights of the Accused
• What are the writ of habeas corpus, bills of
attainder, and ex post facto laws?
• What issues arise from the guarantee of a speedy
and public trial?
• What constitutes a fair trial by jury?
17. CHAPTER 20
Article I, Sections 9 & 10
• Provides for the writ of habeas corpus—a court
order that prevents unjust arrests and
imprisonment
• Prohibits bills of attainder—laws that inflict
punishment without a court trial
• Prohibits ex post facto laws—laws applied
retroactively to acts committed before the laws’
passage
18. CHAPTER 20
Grand Jury
A grand jury is the formal device by which a person can be accused
of a serious crime.
• It is required for federal courts under the 5th Amendment.
• The grand jury deliberates on whether the prosecution’s
indictment, a formal complaint, presents enough evidence against
the accused to justify a trial.
• Only the prosecution presents evidence.
• The right to a grand jury is not covered by the 14th Amendment’s
Due Process Clause. Most States have legislated to skip the grand
jury stage.
19. CHAPTER 20
Speedy and Public Trial
• The right to a speedy and public trial was extended as part of the
14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause by Klopfer v. North
Carolina, 1967.
• The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 requires that the beginning of a
person’s federal criminal trial must take place no more than 100
days after the arrest.
• A judge can limit who may watch a trial if the defendant’s rights
are in jeopardy.
20. CHAPTER 20
Trial by Jury
• Americans in criminal trials are guaranteed an
impartial jury chosen from the district where the
crime was committed.
• If a defendant waives the right to a jury trial, the
judge alone hears the case in a bench trial.
• Most juries have to be unanimous to convict.
21. CHAPTER 20
Right to an Adequate Defense
Some rights of the accused:
• to be informed of the content and form of the
accusation
• to be confronted with the witnesses against
him/her
• to be able to subpoena witnesses to testify on
his/her behalf
• to have a lawyer speak on his/her defense
22. CHAPTER 20
Self-Incrimination
• A person cannot be forced to confess to a crime under extreme
circumstances.
• A husband or wife cannot be forced to testify against their
spouse, although they may testify voluntarily.
The Fifth Amendment declares that no person can be “compelled in
any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” This protection
extends to the States, and sometimes to civil trials if the self-
incrimination could lead to a criminal charge.
In Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, the Supreme Court set an historic
precedent that it would no longer uphold convictions in cases in
which the defendant had not been informed of his or her rights
before questioning. This requirement is known as the Miranda Rule.
23. CHAPTER 20
Section 3 Assessment
1. The ban on bills of attainder exists because
(a) Congress had abused this power.
(b) colonial English government had abused this power.
(c) Thomas Jefferson was the victim of such a bill.
(d) all of the above.
2. A bench trial is held if
(a) the publicity surrounding a case requires it.
(b) the defendant waives the right to a trial by jury.
(c) the defendant pleads guilty.
(d) the prosecutor has little evidence of a crime.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
24. CHAPTER 20
Section 3 Assessment
1. The ban on bills of attainder exists because
(a) Congress had abused this power.
(b) colonial English government had abused this power.
(c) Thomas Jefferson was the victim of such a bill.
(d) all of the above.
2. A bench trial is held if
(a) the publicity surrounding a case requires it.
(b) the defendant waives the right to a trial by jury.
(c) the defendant pleads guilty.
(d) the prosecutor has little evidence of a crime.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
25. CHAPTER 20
Punishment
• What is the purpose of bail and preventive
detention?
• What is the Court’s interpretation of cruel and
unusual punishment?
• What is the history of the Court’s decisions on
capital punishment?
• What is treason?
26. CHAPTER 20
Bail and Preventative Detention
• Bail is a sum of money that the accused may be required to
deposit with the court as a guarantee that he or she will appear in
court.
• The Constitution does not guarantee that all accused persons are
entitled to bail, just that the amount of the bail cannot be
excessive.
• Under federal law, federal judges can order preventive detention,
or imprisonment, of an accused felon without bail if there is a
danger that the person will commit another crime if released.
• Critics think preventive detention amounts to presuming the
accused guilty. The Supreme Court upheld the law in United
States v. Salerno, 1987.
27. CHAPTER 20
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
• The 8th Amendment is intended to prevent, in the Court’s opinion,
barbaric tortures such as drawing and quartering and other
excessively cruel punishments.
• The Supreme Court held that defining narcotics addiction as a
crime, rather than an illness, was cruel and unusual in Robinson
v. California, 1962. In Estelle v. Gamble, 1976, it ruled that a prison
inmate could not be denied medical care.
• However, generally the Court has not found many punishments to
be cruel and unusual.
The 8th Amendment also forbids “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The Supreme Court extended the provision to the States in
Robinson v. California, 1962.
28. CHAPTER 20
Capital Punishment
• The Supreme Court voided capital punishment laws in the early
1970s because it felt that the punishment was applied
“capriciously” to only a few convicts, often African American or
poor or both.
• However, in 1976, the Court held for the first time that a new law
which instituted the death penalty was NOT unconstitutional. The
new law provided for a two-stage trial process. One trial would
determine guilt or innocence, and a second hearing would decide
whether the death penalty was warranted. The Court later
restricted the use of the death penalty to cases where the victim
died.
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is hotly debated
under the 8th Amendment.
Despite these decisions, debate still surrounds the issue.
29. CHAPTER 20
Treason
Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution.
Treason is:
1. Levying war against the United States or
2. Giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.
• A person can commit treason only in times of war, and it is
punishable by the death penalty.
• Other related acts, such as sabotage or espionage, can be
committed in peacetime.
• John Brown, who was hanged as a traitor to Virginia because of
his raid on Harper’s Ferry, is the only person ever to be executed
for treason against a State.
30. CHAPTER 20
Section 4 Assessment
1. Bail is
(a) a fine you have to pay if you are arrested.
(b) a tax to support jails.
(c) a deposit you put down to guarantee appearance in court.
(d) a contract between the State and a prisoner.
2. Treason is
(a) the only crime defined in the Constitution.
(b) punishable by death.
(c) committed only in wartime.
(d) all of the above.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!
31. CHAPTER 20
Section 4 Assessment
1. Bail is
(a) a fine you have to pay if you are arrested.
(b) a tax to support jails.
(c) a deposit you put down to guarantee appearance in court.
(d) a contract between the State and a prisoner.
2. Treason is
(a) the only crime defined in the Constitution.
(b) punishable by death.
(c) committed only in wartime.
(d) all of the above.
Want to connect to the Magruder’s link for this chapter? Click Here!