Elsevier’s CEO discusses open access and “partnering with the librarian community to support the next chapter of research." View the full speech here: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/kumsal-bayazit-on-collaborating-to-support-the-research-community-the-next-chapter
5. Life expectancy: From 31 to 72 years since 1800
5Source: Riley (2005), Clio Infra (2015), UN Population Division (2019), https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1800 1831 1862 1890 1921 1951 1982 2012
LifeExpectancy(years)
6. Extreme poverty: From 85% to 9% since 1800
6Source: OWID based on World Bank (2019) and Bourguinon and Morrisson (2002), https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1820
1850
1870
1890
1910
1929
1950
1960
1970
1980
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2010
2011
2012
2013
2015
Billions
Number living in poverty People not in poverty
7. Literacy rates: From 10% to 86% since 1800
7Source: Our World in Data based on OECD and UNESCO (2016), https://ourworldindata.org/literacy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1800
1820
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
GlobalLiteracyRate
Literate world population Illiterate world population
8. HIV infections per year nearly halved since 1997
8Source: IMHE, Global Burden of Disease, https://ourworldindata.org/hiv-aids
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Millions
New infections of HIV/AIDS
9. Access to electricity: From 72% to 85% since 1991
9Source: The World Bank, World Development Indicators (WDI), and UN Population Prospects, https://ourworldindata.org/energy-access
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Billions
People w/o access People w/ access
10. Children with at least one vaccination:
From 22% to 88% since 1980
10Source: WHO (2017) and UN Population Division (2017), https://ourworldindata.org/vaccination
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Hepatitis B3 DPT Measles Polio
11. Women in the workforce: Overall vs. Research
11
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 decennial censuses and 2011 American Community Survey
The Intersectionality of Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin in the STEM Workforce1 Anthony Martínez and Asiah Gayfield
Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division U.S. Census Bureau SEHSD Working Paper Number 2018-27 February 2019
36%
42%
45%
47% 48% 47%
7%
14%
23%
25% 26% 25%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2011 2016
FemaleWorkforcePercentage
Women in Workforce & STEM Occupations, 1970 - 2016
Total Workforce STEM
12. 12
Grand Challenges in Research
Global warming Ocean pollution Food & water security Lifespan & quality Social inequality & growth
14. Perspectives: Government and Funders
• Protect and grow R&D spending
• Address international and interdisciplinary
Grand Challenges
• Make funding choices
• Demonstrate research impact on society
14
15. Perspectives: Research Leaders
• Build best in class research
organizations
• Attract top researchers and
collaborators
• Fund facilities and high-impact research
15
16. Perspectives: Researchers
• Discover and invent to solve problems
• Win funding, attract talent and collaborators
• Ensure reproducibility
• Understand adjacent fields, connect the dots
across disciplines
16
17. Perspectives: Librarians
• Delivering universities’ missions
• Continue as guardians of knowledge dissemination
• Enable data management and reproducibility
• Preserve and showcase intellectual outputs
• Evolve assessment of research impact
• Progress Open Access and Open Science
• Manage costs
17
18. Fundamental issue: R&D spend, library budgets
18Source: 1. OECD, 2. Scopus, 3. ARL data, including reproduction of chart: http://www.libqual.org/documents/admin/EG_2.pdf
Library expenditure CAGR based on absolute total library spending, based on ARL data 2007-2016.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Billions(USD)
Global Gross Domestic
Spending on R&D1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Millions
Global Publication Output2
Library Expenditures as % of
University Expenditures3
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
CAGR: 3-4% CAGR: 4-5% CAGR: 1-2%
19. Perspectives: Librarians
• Delivering universities’ missions
• Continue as guardians of knowledge dissemination
• Enable data management and reproducibility
• Preserve and showcase intellectual outputs
• Evolve assessment of research impact
• Progress Open Access and Open Science
• Manage costs
19
21. Obstacles to overcome: (1) Researchers’ views
21
*Source: CDL Pay it Forward report: https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ICIS-UC-Pay-It-Forward-Final-Report.rev_.7.18.16.pdf
“When asked about the importance of various journal
criteria in deciding where to publish, authors placed
journal quality above all else… Open Access
ranked as least important ...it will be very difficult,
impossible in some cases to convince authors to
switch to new journals in a new publishing system
purely for the sake of open access.”
- California Digital Library Pay it Forward report, 2016*
Importance of Factors When
Selecting Where to Publish
(highest to lowest)*
1. Quality and reputation of journal
2. Fit with scope of journal
3. Audience
4. Impact Factor
5. Likelihood of acceptance
6. Time from submission to publication
7. Editor or editorial board
8. Open Access
22. Obstacles to overcome: (2) Funding flows
U15 is:
• Strongly committed to Open
Access
• Strongly supportive of
DEAL negotiating team
• …But clear that funding
redistribution challenges
must be addressed
22
German U15 press release: https://www.german-u15.de/aktivitaeten/publikationen/statements/DEAL/index.html
23. Obstacles to overcome: (3) Predatory publishing
• Fact: Gold OA publishers are
paid if article is accepted, but
not if it is rejected
• Challenge for Gold OA
publishing:
− Maintaining standards of quality
and integrity
− Upholding trust in science
23
26. Committed to social responsibility
26
• #2 of 1,200 in S&P rankings1
• #2 of 100 in Harvard Business Review rankings2
• #4 of 100 Responsibility100 Index3
Source: 1. CSRHUB https://www.csrhub.com/CSR_and_sustainability_information/RELX-PLC,
2. Responsibility100 Index https://members.tortoisemedia.com/2019/09/23/responsibility-100-day-one/content.html,
3. Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2019/11/the-ceo-100-2019-edition
29. Imagine… no friction in peer review
• Evolve peer review traditions
around anonymity and credit
• Deploy ML to tackle plagiarism,
fraudulent submissions and
manipulated images
• Use AI to improve author journal
submission experiences
29
30. Imagine… no friction between disciplines
• Support interdisciplinary
research with Grand Challenge
journals
• Recommend relevant content
and collaborators that connects
the dots for researchers
30Source: https://www.cell.com/one-earth/home
31. Imagine… no friction in resource allocation
• Identify hot areas of research
where there are distinct
capabilities to leverage
31Source: Scival
Topics of Prominence (Hot Areas of Research Map):
32. Imagine… no friction in data management
• Enable researchers to
document methods, protocols,
and manage data according to
FAIR principles
32Source: Hivebench, Mendeley
33. Imagine… easily demonstrating impact
• Establish new standards and
indicators beyond publications
and citations that measure
societal impact
33Source: https://www.elsevier.com/icsr
34. Imagine… inclusive and diverse research and
research communities
• Drive culture change and
deploy analytics to:
− Measure progress
− Balance participation: editorial
boards, conferences, peer review
− Include gender in the science
34
35. Imagine… the possibilities of partnerships
• Co-invest and work together
where, in the community’s
judgment, it will help us all go
further faster
• Multi-lateral issues need
multi-stakeholder solutions
35Source: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/105338/paper_108.pdf?sequence=1
Example: Research Data Management Librarian Academy