Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to 10222, 430 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard LearnPage 1 of
Similar to 10222, 430 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard LearnPage 1 of (17)
More from samirapdcosden
More from samirapdcosden (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
10222, 430 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard LearnPage 1 of
- 1. 10/2/22, 4:30 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Page 1 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1 Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Excellent Good Fair Poor Main Posting 45 (45%) - 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three
- 2. current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully 40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible
- 3. sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are super"cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two
- 4. credible sources. 0 (0%) - 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or super"cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric
- 5. EXIT Grid View List View https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1# https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1# 10/2/22, 4:30 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Page 2 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1 adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two
- 6. spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3. 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
- 7. First Response 17 (17%) - 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at 15 (15%) - 16 (16%) Response
- 8. exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more 13 (13%) - 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective
- 9. professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few 0 (0%) - 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible
- 10. sources are cited. 10/2/22, 4:30 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Page 3 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1 least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English.
- 11. or no credible sources are cited. Second Response 16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly
- 12. sources. Demonstrates 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively
- 13. 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) - 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic
- 14. and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. 10/2/22, 4:30 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Page 4 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links- BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_i d=_3280046_1 synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is e#ectively written in standard,
- 15. edited English. written in standard, edited English. Participation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric EXIT Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other
- 16. challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety. In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy. To Prepare: · Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy. · Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy. By Day 3 of Week 7 Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples. RESOURCES: Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. · Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only) · Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence- Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146) · Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only) · Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only) https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/