Kick-off meeting for EU medical education project
•
0 likes•2 views
Presentation regarding implementation of online adaptative international progressive testing.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Kick-off meeting for EU medical education project
Similar to Kick-off meeting for EU medical education project (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Kick-off meeting for EU medical education project
- 1. Kick-off meeting September 18th 2018 Project OAIPT ‘Online Adaptive International Progress Test’
- 2. EU project OAIPT EU funded project Key action 2 Strategic partnership September 2018 – September 2021 Total budget EUR 332.720,00 8 partners
- 3. Motivation and Aims Motivation 1. Major differences between the quality of assessment between schools 2. Mobility of students / patient safety 3. Comparison of curricula between EU schools 4. Promote self-directed learning
- 4. Motivation and Aims Aims Developing collaborative test materials To make cultural differences visible Set up an infrastructure which can be applied to a wider consortium and other fields of education Improving EU standards for assessing medical students in EU
- 5. Partners and representatives 1. Maastricht University, the Netherlands o Cees van der Vleuten o Carlos Collares o Annemarie Camp o Anne van Dijk 2. University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands o Debbie Jaarsma o Bram Jacobs o Michiel Katoele o Ally van Hell 3. University of Minho o José Miguel Pegô o Ana Monica Pereira 4. University of Exeter o Adrian Freeman o Neil Reice 5. University of Plymouth o Tom Gale o Steven Burr o Jolanta Kisielewska 6. University of Helsinki, Finlan o Otto Helve 7. Jagiellonian University, Poland o Michal Nowakowski o Mateusz Rubinkiewicz o Kamila ZurWyrozumska 8. Medical University of Lodz o Janusz Janczukowicz o Katarzyna Janusz o Emil Zielonka
- 6. Steering group Cees van der Vleuten (chair) – Maastricht University Debbie Jaarsma – Medical University Center Groningen José Miguel Pegô – University of Minho Michal Nowakowski – Jagiellonian University Adrian Freeman – University of Exeter Janusz Janczukowicz – Medical University of Lodz Thomas Gale – University of Plymouth Jussi Merenmies –University of Helsinki External advisor: Janke Cohen-Schotanus
- 7. Overview Intellectual Outputs & Responsible partner school IO 1 ITEMBANK – Maastricht University IO 2 INFRASTRUCTURE – University Medical Center Groningen IO 3 EVUALATION OF THE PILOT – University of Exeter IO 4 TRANSFERABILITY – Medical University of Lodz
- 9. Planning
- 10. Actions per partner Check your responsibilities and timeline ! as Intellectual Output leader and / or activity/Activities Make a plan of action for each activity send to IO leader and coordinator
- 11. Training, meetings, software Short-term joint staff training event on side at each partner school: complete Doodle ASAP Face-to-face meetings 1st meeting in Maastricht, Oct 5th 2nd meeting in Braga, March 2019 Software TestLife: December 17 or 18 online demonstration
- 12. Finances Budget overview per IO and each activity – specified per partner Budget for transnational meetings , multiplier events and software license in exceptional costs sheet. No budget for short-term-joint staff trainings, only for the trainers (Maastricht) Compensation for Itemwriting part of task 1.5
- 13. Finances 1st installment of payment -> 40% of total budget: Nov 2019 2nd installment of payment -> 40% of total budget: Okt 2020 Final installment of payment after final report Costs consultancy during grant submission: 1640 EUR per partner
- 14. Reporting deadlines Progress report – September 30th, 2019 Interim report – September 30th, 2020 Final report – end of project
- 15. Partner contract & Intellectual property Partner contract in process Subject is Intellectual property Usage of items within partner schools for own local tests?
- 16. Questions?
Editor's Notes
- Welcome everybody for this first online meeting. Today is a kick-off meeting where we are trying to inform you and guide you through the project. I’ll use the powerpoint presentation in which all agenda topcis come back. We’ll do a short introducation of all people attending this meeting in a few minutes.
- I would like to start with some general information, the motivation for this project and the aims. Please feel free to raise questions, but please stick to the subject.at the end their is more room for questions. So, this erasmus project is funded by the EU as you all know.
- Some use more traditional assessment methods then others. Or use methods to assess short term memory Students are moving accross EU, its difficult to to assure the quality of our assessments and performance of students with respect to patient safety Collaboration of this project and joint test production stimulates educational quality which enables school to compare their curricula and make changes where necessary. Possible to benchmark students performance Set up a tool to provide longnitudinal feedback which at the end promotes self-directed learning of students,
- Joint production of items and join test constructon. We set up and share an itembank. The project takes into account local cultural differences in our blueprint of the test. Infrastructure which includes all steps and requirements to implement progress testing, taken into account an efficient workflow. So for item writing, reviewing, test construction adminstration and so on. Through this partnership, a wider community and methods will be created to improve the EU standards for assessing students and in a longer term the quaility of education accross EU.
- Consortium represents 5 countries
- The steering group monitors the project and achievements of the project. They discuss the progress every 6 months and write a small report. The steering group could attend the transnational project meetings, but not for all of them their participation needed. However, I think that all of these persons are very commited to the project and will also work on project management and other activities. So their role will be sometimes twofold.
- See also page 13 and further in the word file of the grant application which has been submitted
- Here you will see an overview of leaders per IO and activity. All partners are responsible for the work being carried out in the project. Each IO will consist of multiple phases or activities executed by a specific partner.
- Each IO leader is responsible for the management and the explained outcomes or outputs of the IO. They have to communicatie, manage with and monitor the activities with the activity leaders. We expect that every activity leader will make a Plan of action that outlines the intended results , work activities, roles, planning and so on.
- Doodle for this. Please respons asap. The training is a 3 days training which provides your staff members training on progress testing, computerised adaptive testing, in item writing and reviewing and understanding the test results also for faculty staff members.
- Itemwriting is included in budget for task 1.5 ‘ developing items’ which means 30 days as a teacher rate for each country.
- The grant Budget comes to Maastricht. We will compensate you based on the task you are doing, the meetings etc and the fixed amount for project management within a certain period. We will know more about the financial rules and regualtions in Ocotber after the meeting we have with the National agency. Internally we also make arrangements and get support from the UM finance department.
- Final report after 60 days of the end date.