5. RELATED LEGISLATIONS
The Family Assistance and Other
Legislation Amendment Act 2011
The Social Services and Other
Legislation Amendment Act 2014
5
6. ASSESSMENT REGIMES
1987 Impairment Tables
1991 Tables for the Assessment of
Impairment for Disability Support
Pension 22 Tables
1997 passed by both Houses of
the Parliament
6
7. Continues…
2006 Medical model to
Impairment/Work Capacity model
2010 Simplified assessment process
2012 Impairment Tables- 15 Tables
Legislative instrument means can be
updated at any time
2014 Program of Support Rule
7
8. MEDICAL ASSESSMENT
Prior to January 2015, Treating Doctor
Report
On 12 Dec. 2014 the Government
announced new rules
Under 35 from January 01, 2015
For others 01 July 2015
8
9. Continues…
Claimants provide evidence to
Centrelink with the support of a GP
Job Capacity Assessor assess based on
Impairment Tables
To Program of Support
To Govt. Contracted Doctor for
evidence based review of medical
conditions
9
10. Policy: Participation
2010 Voluntary participation
2010 Area Project Customer Advisor to
communicate with new DSP recipients in 3 months
and 12 months
In 2012 <35 years with work capacity of 8 hours
and more, to develop participation plan
2012 <35 years old DSP recipient, Interviews on a
quarterly basis for first 18 months and then twice
a year.
2014 Compulsory participation
10
11. Policy: Hours of work
Work capacity/Hours of work
Until 2000 People can receive DSP if they have work
capacity <30
In 2000 Inability to work reduced from 30 hours to 15
hours per week
Before 11 May 2005 DSP recipients could work up to
30 hours before their payment was suspended
On or after 11 May 2005 DSP recipients could work up
to 15 hours before their payment was suspended
In July 2012 DSP recipients were allowed to work up
to 30 hours a week continuously for up to two years
without having their payment suspended or cancelled
11
12. Policy: Client Review
2012 Service Update Review
Most at risk not meeting the current eligibility criteria
From 1 July 2014, DSP recipients under 35 years of age with an assessed work
capacity of eight hours or more per week will be required to participate in
‘compulsory activities’ aimed at assisting them to find employment
Reclaims DSP on or after 3 September 2011, is to be assessed under the post 3
September 2011 rules. Means reclaims are treated as new claims
2014:DSP recipients aged under 35 years who were granted DSP between 1
January 2008 and 31 December 2011, eligibility will be reviewed against the
revised Impairment Tables
From 27 November 2014, DSP starters were required to demonstrate that they
had actively participated in a POS
2016 Additional medical reviews over next 3 years targeting those who are
risk of not meeting eligibility criteria using 2012 revised Tables
2016 Government planned to send 30,000 DSP recipients for assessment
12
13. Policy: Program of Support Rule
In September 2011 Government
introduced Program of Support rule
DSP granted in 2007 would require to
undertake POS
New applicant must be in a program
of support for 18 month within last 36
months to quality for DSP
13
14. Continues
POS which started before 5 January
2015, It could be partially or wholly
funded by the Commonwealth, or it is
similar to a program funded wholly or
partly by the Commonwealth
Programs that started on or after 5
January 2015, is funded wholly or
partly by the Commonwealth
14
15. POLICY: OVERSEAS TRAVEL
July 2012 DSP recipients with severe and
permanent with no work capacity can travel
overseas indefinitely while retaining their pension
Until December 2014, DSP recipients were paid for
temporary absences from Australia for up to six
weeks, on multiple occasions on a given year
From 1 January 2015, DSP recipients will be able
to travel overseas for no more than four weeks in
a 12 month period and still receive the payment
15
16. BUDGETARY MEASURES
2009-2010 Subsidies to employer, a new Health
Professional unit at Centrelink
2011-2012 Compulsory Participation
2012-2013 Health Professional Advice Unit audited
one percent of recent DSP claim over 12 months
period
In 2014-15 to review 28,000 < 35 years
2016 subsidies to employers if claimant can be
engaged in work for 26 weeks
2016 government planned to review 30,000 in the
next three years 16
17. PROGRAMS
2003 Job Network DSP Pilot
2006 developed various trials to engage in
employment
2012 Participation Plan activities - Work for the
Dole, Job Search, Work Experience, Education
and Training, and connection with the Disability
Employment Services . This will be the first
time that participation requirements have been
attached to the DSP
2014 Participation plan
17
18. CONTINUE INABILITY TO WORK RULE
From 1 July 2006, to have a CITW, a person
must, among other things, be unable to work
for 15 hours or more per week in the next 2
years
The DSP claimant made a claim on or after 3
September 2011, are subject to the 15 hour
rule 18
19. QUALIFICATION
Aged between 16 years and the Age
Pension age
Meet the residency requirements
Meet the income and assets tests
Permanent physical, intellectual or
psychiatric conditions
Cannot work more than 15 hours per week
19
20. Continues
Assessed as having a total of 20 points
or more under the Impairment Tables
Continuing Inability to Work
Medical conditions that have been fully
diagnosed, treated and stabilised
Participated in POS for 18 months
within 36 months
20
21. A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE REFORMS OF DSP
DSP Governance
ANAO report 2016 discusses the
incompetency of DSP implementation by the
Government agencies
Efficiency, Time lines, 2013-14 almost 23%
changed by Review Officers, 23% went to
Tribunal, review process up to 12 months
Were suitable assessors engaged?
21
22. Continue….
Are the current claimants outcome aligned
with legislations?
Clients profile review- were these
appropriately targeted?
Documentations of decision? Good practice of
administrative law ? It contradicts with
Australian Administrative Law Policy Guide
2001 22
23. Continue
Impairment Tables – Why it took such a long
time to reform? An advisory committee
recommended to review and evaluate before
implementation
Program of Support and its referral process?
Unclear decisions and not informed decision
Inconsistency in assessment
23
24. Continues
Could be varied decision between Assessor
and Centrelink Delegate
How does it link to human rights especially
ICSER 1966?
How do clients group view it?
What are the stakeholders’ view about DSP?
24
25. References
ANAO 2016 Qualifying for the DSP
Federal Registrar of Legislation (1991). Social Security Act 1991. Canberra,
Federal Registrar of Legislation, Government of Australian.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2012). Social Security Disability Support
Pension Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 96(2) available at
http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/5-social-security/disability-support-
pension#_ftnref141 accessed on 14th April 2016
Productivity Commission (2011). Disability Support and Care
FaHCSIA (2012). Guide to Social Security Law (2012)
<www.fahcsia.gov.au/guides_acts>.
25