Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Every year in the United States approximately 26 million animals are used for scientific and
commercial testing. The animals are used for a variety of reasons such as, to develop medical
treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products intended for human
usage and, other biochemical, commercial, and health care uses. Ever since 500 BC, animals have
been used for testing. Animal testing has had many positive outcomes; it enabled the development of
many lifesaving treatments for animals and humans. There has yet to be found an alternative for
testing and researching a living organism, however many people consider animal testing is harsh and
inhuman. Furthermore, animals and humans are different so, the results of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing Essay
Science has come a very long way in the past decade. Scientists have created vaccines, medicine, and
life changing technology that people use every day. Many people wonder how these things are
created. Animal testing was a major part in the creation of them, but that does not make it alright.
Scientists should not test products on animals because they are put through unnecessary tests, there
are alternatives to it, and the animals are put through physical distress.
The animals being tested on are put through unnecessary tests. Scientists artificially induce them
with a disease or condition that they would never naturally contract ("Animal Testing"). If these
animals were in their natural habitat they would most likely be completely healthy. They would not
be in pain or in terrible mental conditions if this were the case. These animals are kept in a distressful
environment ("Animal Testing")....show more content...
The only law in the U.S. that allows animals to be tested on allows them to go through horrible tests.
The government has no idea what these scientists do to the animals. "Lab animals will sometimes
suffer more than people would, sometimes physically, sometimes psychologically (Animal
Experimentation 84)." These animals are burned, poisoned, isolated, shocked, restrained, drug
addicted, starved, and brain–damaged. People fail to understand how much these tests affect the
animals. After these tests, they are left damaged, emotionally, and physically. They suffer through all
of this so people can have beauty products. The laws do not have any restrictions ("Animal Testing").
The tests can be extremely painful. Painkillers are not required either. They could be put through
brutal tests that leave them in extreme pain, and they will not be given painkillers. They are put
through extreme testing, terrible pain, emotional distress, and are not given any painkillers. These
animals suffer, some of the time more than humans

Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay
26 million animals are used every single year in the US for scientific, and commercial testing.
Animals are usually used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of certain
medications, or any products meant for human use, or other biomedical, commercial, and health care
uses. Testing on animals has been lasting from at least 500 BC.
Some good uses for animal testing that has come out to be good is that it had brought us
development of many life–saving treatments for both animals and humans. There seems to be no
alternative method for researching on a completely living organism.
Some may say that animal testing is cruel and that there shouldn't be a process like this for such
animals. Again as if the moment there is no other alternative...show more content...
I would say that there really is no side to pick on for me personally. I would pick both in my
opinion. Animal testing is important to humankind to see if certain antibiotics are safe to try and
use. Although animal testing is horrible and cruel and very hard to have still happen, it is still
important that we save lives and keep families happy. Again it is very hard to see such beautiful
animals in pain, how an animal is also trying to live its basic life cycle. But sometimes in a society
and world like this, we need to take risks like this in order to have a healthy

Cons Of Animal Testing
Like any controversial topic some believe the pros of animal testing outweigh the cons and vice
versa. The ethical outlook dominates both of them. What this essentially means is that emotion is
perhaps the fundamental influential element in whether a person deems the advantages of animal
testing overshadow the troubles correlated with the experiment. "If a monkey is very sick it will
lie down when people turn their backs." (185). Therefore due to the experimentation, "the sick
monkey was holding its knees and there were star like speckles on its eyelids when Hensley turned
her back the monkey laid down in its cage." (185). These monkeys would not show in front of the
scientists that they were suffering, instead they did it quietly and in secret.

Generally speaking, if you were to hear, "It's time for you to test a vaccine that may or may not be
dangerous or even possibly fatal, for the sake of a different species." It's understandable that the
notion of this may make you feel uncomfortable. Nevertheless, this exact situation is what happens
to animals across the world. One charged debate that has taken place for a long period, of time, is
whether animal testing has a valid position, within, the field of health and medicine studies. There are
two heavily opinionated sides within this conflict. There are those who feel Animal Testing is
necessary for the future of medicine, then there are the people who believe that animal testing (
even though, perhaps once had a reasonable stand) no longer serves a purpose in health and
medicine, believing animal testing to be ( for many people but not all) morally unacceptable and an
outdated practice. Upon reflecting on the arguments brought before both sides of this debate, it can
be concluded that animals should no longer be used to test on as it's ineffective and a waste of time.
Pursuing this further Animal Testing should be a discarded practice due to its inaccuracy in treating
diseases in a timely manner. Within the article, stop animal testing it...show more content...
These newer ways are not perfect, but with dedicated time and research, it has a great chance of
surpassing the results of Animal

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Before a particular medicine or treatment is offered for human use, there are tested by scientist in
animals to see their effectiveness. There are positive sides of animal testing.
Animal testing helps researchers discover new drugs and treatment. Ruggeri, Camp, and Miknyoczki
(2013) describe that animal models can help people to understand the pathology of cancer, identify
the therapy method, help the drug research and development of human cancer There are many tests
and medical researches had been done to animals that had led to the discovery of many medicines
and treatments to cure and save the lives of people. According to the California Biomedical
Research Association, every discovery in the last century was as a result of animal testing, such as
insulin for the treatment of diabetic and the polio vaccine (ProCon.org, 2014, p 1). Animal testing
also had being very important for new treatment of breath cancer,...show more content...
McGonigle (2013) studied the development and application of animal models of CNS disorder. The
author believed the animal model of CNS disorder explored pathology and molecular mechanism,
and assessed the therapeutic utility. McGonigle (2013) also proposed that animal models are
essential tools to underlying pathology and found out the potential efficacy of therapeutic
intervention. Another example is that Chimpanzees and mice's DNA that is almost 100 %
genetically similar to humans. That high percentage in similarity makes sense due we all are
mammals descending from the common ancestors. Humans and animals share the same organs,
which they all have the same functions. We also share the same conditions and illness, so that
similarity make animal a reliable resources to conduct researches. It also makes animals become a
appropriate tool to test drugs for new treatment as well as to improve the once that we have on place
(ProCon.org, 2014, p

Animal Testing: Pros and Cons Essay
The ethical treatment and testing on animals is a widely controversial subject in the field of zoology.
Views on animal testing range from positivity to full negativity. Animals such as mice and rats have
been found to have psychological and genetic similarities that relate to humans which make them
perfect for the experimental trials. Before various products are put out for humans consumption,
animals are the most common way for companies to see if their new inventions work. The benefits
and improvements to modern medicine as a result of animal testing should be weighed heavily
against the harmful and toxic ingredients used in such experiments and their detrimental effects on
test subjects like rats and mice. Something important to...show more content...
The three Rs represents a way of keeping to an absolute minimum of usage, purifying experiments
down to the basics and using alternatives. These will benefit the animals and help worried
consumers. Changes in modern medicine because of animal experimentation can be seen in many
parts of the field of medicine. Not only in human medicine, but also in veterinary medicine are
obvious improvements. There are better vaccines for rabies, amongst many others, and treatments
for feline leukemia. According to Americans for Medical Progress, 2.7 million Americans have an
active seizure disorder (Animal Research). It is reported that because of animal testing, nine new
medicines and eight treatments are in the process of being created from product testing on animals.
Also, there is restored hope that there is a chance that diseases like AIDS and heart disease could be
cured because of experimental animal trials (Animal Research). There has also been dramatic
improvements for a Parkinson's Disease treatment including stem cell therapy first done on animals
(Animal Research). The improvements are very beneficial to not only humans but also animals alike.
On the other hand, there are many harmful toxins and ingredients in the testing materials that cause
harm to animals. Animal advocates believe that all creatures should have the same rights as humans
(The

The Debate About Animal Testing This book was a really good source for two reasons. I used
this source a lot in my paper not just quoting what the author said, but also using the case studies.
The case studies helped me a lot because they usually worked as examples of abuse and
neglect..The case studies helped me a out because, there was a lot of good ones that talked a lot
about what exactly is happening in labs. They talk about a lot of stuff that people don't really
know what's going on in the labs. This book also had a few really good quotes that I used. That is
why this book was a really good source to use. Animal Experimentation and Testing In this book
they talked about a lot of a ways to help protect animals that are in a pound. They protect people in
pounds because, they aren't aloud to sell them to labs. So that way they aren't able to be tested on
just because they are pound animals.They also talked a lot about anesthetics and how that animals
that were tested on had to be in pain because they didn't use any pain relievers until the 1840s. That
is helpful to my paper because, that is considered abuse because that is putting pain in to the animal
that is unneeded....show more content...
They say how that people don't always have a one shot kill. A one shot kill is basically where it
takes one bullet and they're dead.They talk about how some animals can't even get enough food for
the winter because they can't go find food due to being watched to be killed. That is important
because most animals need to get food to survive. So if they can't go out and search for food
without being shot at thats abuse because they are not able to eat. That is considered starvation to the

Should Animal Experimentation Be Allowed? "Three baby mice found sealed alive in a plastic
baggie and left unattended on a laboratory counter..." (Guillermo, Kathy). How is that kind of cruel
laziness suppose to determine whether or not our medicine is safe? I believe animal testing is an
unproductive form of experimentation that should not be legal. Animal experimentation is used
every day in laboratories like the University of California at Davis Center for Neuroscience, known
for the unattended mice, to observe symptoms that may occur in organisms when exposed to
numerous products. Initially, animal testing brought hope for cures from horrendous and fatal
diseases. Now, all animal testing does is waste the lives of innocent creatures for...show more
content...
Animals have many anatomical, metabolic, and cellular differences when compared to humans.
Thomas Hartung, a toxicology professor at John Hopkins University, argued for alternatives to
animal experimentation because "We are not 70 kg rats." In the 1950's, an epidemic occurred
caused by the animal tested sleeping pill called thalidomide. Over 10,000 babies were born with
severe deformities, yet all mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters passed it. The arthritis drug
Vioxx which had protective effects on the hearts of mice had caused 27,000 sudden cardiac deaths
and heart attacks before being pulled from the market. If this is not enough evidence to prove
animals are not like humans anatomically, let us look at some more evidence (ProCon.org). Based
on the National Academy of Sciences, a 2013 study states that nearly 150 human clinical trials for
treatments that reduce inflammation failed, but the trials were successful in animals. According to
neurologist Aysha Akhtar, ninety
–four percent of drugs that pass animals tests fail in human clinical
trials. In addition, over one–hundred stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have
failed in humans. Finally, approximately 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working well in
non–human primates. Consequently, thousands of human lives have been ended or damaged due to
the unreliability of animal testing and how the drugs will react in a human body. Animals aren't

Animal Testing Pros And Cons
There is many pros and cons when it comes to animal testing in many industries. Animals have been
used for testing for many decades in recent history, and even in the present. There are many types of
animal testing, the more popular ones been in used for makeup, scientific experiments, clothing
brands and more. At first, hearing about animal testing is a sad and cruel thing to do or think of. But
the number one reason why we do it, is for the safety of human lives. The reason why it is the
number one reason is to save human lives from any defects that can harm the user. One big piece of
evidence that proved that animal testing should be taking into consideration and use is the
Thalidomide disaster. The Thalidomide disaster happened because...show more content...
If we tested these products on humans then we would clearly know how these specific chemicals,
ingredients, products, etc would affect the main user which are Humans. This would make clear
sense but the reason why these testing facilities would use animals is because the Human body Is
complex and animals are a better substitute. It is possible to do basic tests on cell lines but this
does not replicate the complex interconnected processes of a live body and can never predict
potential side effects on different organs within the body. In the meantime animals make good test
subjects because they are very similar to humans. Mammals share a common ancestry which means
that our organs, circulatory system, endocrine system, nervous system etc and work in very similar
ways. The DNA of mice is 98% similar to that of humans. Chimpanzee DNA is 99% similar.
Animals suffer from a lot of the same diseases as humans – insulin to treat diabetes was developed
from research on

Which life is more valuable, a human or an animal? Put yourself in an animal's position. What if
you're pet was the animal chosen to be tested on for "human safety"? What would you say? How
would you react? According to Dr. Richard Klausner, former Director of the National Cancer
Institute, "We have cured cancer in mice for decades and it simply didn't work in humans." Even
chimpanzees, our closest genetic relatives, do not accurately predict results in humans–of the more
than 80 HIV vaccines that have proven safe and efficacious in chimpanzees, all have failed to
protect or prove safe in humans in nearly 200 human clinical trials, with one actually increasing a
human's chance of HIV infection. For countless years' animals testing has become a known
audacious idea to humans. More than 30 million animals have been used for all kinds or testing and
experiments. Animal testing is unlawful and other techniques can be replaced instead of animal
testing by stem cells, computerized database and chemicals.
Animal testing is pathetic and unlawful because it leads to inaccurate and misleading diagnosis. It is
also abusive, not reliable and very expensive. According to the Humane Society, registration of a
single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals.
Controversy occurs when there is a perception that the animals being used in the experiments are
subjected to cruel, unusual and inhumane treatment. Proponents of animal testing cite the

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
In this research i will be going to explain the cons of animals testing. Animal testing is cruel and
inhumane. Animal testing is wasteful, it is bad science, 92 out of 100 drugs that pass animal tests
fail in humans.
Animals are infected with diseases that they would never normally contract. Tiny mice grow tumors
as large as their own bodies, kittens are purposely blinded, rats are made to suffer seizures and
primates. Skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them. Experimenters force–feed
chemicals to animals, conduct repeated surgeries on them, implant wires in their brains and crush
their spins. Animals are being used for testing at rapid rates and yet there have not been any major
scientific discoveries made to serve as alternatives...show more content...
The animals being tested may be 99% similar to us, but the other 1% could lead to many errors as
animals vary to much in anatomy and biology and are insufficient models for humans. Animals
endure chemicals being dropped into their eyes, injected into their bodies forced up their nostrils or
forced down their throats. They are addicted to drugs, forced to inhale/ingest toxic substances,
subjected to maternal deprivation, deafened, blinded, burned, stapled and infected with disease
viruses. Animals endure significant amounts of stress and some are even held in confinement for
an uncounted amount of time. Some experiments on animals require animals to die as a part of the
test, for example, regulatory tests for botox, vaccines and some tests for chemical safety are
essentially variations of the cruel lethal dose 50 test in which 50% of the animals die or are killed.
Were all familiar with the phrase "putting lipstick on a pig" but some corporations are thoughtless
enough to take it literally. Cosmetics companies have promoted animal testing for years. While some
argue it offers insight into human endangerment. The FDA reports that 92% of drugs approved for
testing in humans fail to receive approval for human use. This

Cons Of Animal Testing Essay
The Cons of Animal Testing
Can you imagine being locked up in a cage with no control over anything? Not even when you
eat? That is how life is like for an animal in research labs. They are abused and the lab researchers
don't care. Even though there are a very few benefits to using animals for research, there are many
benefits for not using them. Animal testing is costly, animals are mistreated, and there are many
other safe alternatives. To begin with, animal testing is very costly and more expensive than
alternate methods. The US National Institute of Health (NIH) has an animal budget of $31 billion
and for animal research they spend an average of $14 – $16 billion annually. I think that all this
money being used for animal testing could be used for other important...show more content...
Instead of abusing animals while testing, there are many other methods such as computer modeling,
human volunteers, cell–based tests and tissue models. "A variety of cell–based tests and tissue
models can be used to assess the safety of drugs, chemicals, cosmetics, and consumer products."
("Alternatives to Animal Testing"). Not all tests can be reliable, such as identifying chemicals that
cause birth defects or allergic reaction, but scientists are trying to develop methods (Curren). The
quality and humanness of testing will improve if animals are replaced by vitro methods. These tests
will often be cheaper, quicker, and more effective ("Alternatives to Animal Testing"). The study of
naturally occurring disease and the health in humans is called epidemiology. The results of this study
has provided researchers and health practitioners with an understanding of causes, treatments, and
preventions of a range of human illnesses and no animals were mistreated as a result ("Animals in
Science/Alternatives"). Animals can stop suffering and dying from these experiments if these
alternatives are used more

The Pros of Animal Testing Essay
Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, "Without animal research, polio would
still be claiming thousands of lives each year." Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that
spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless
while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, "...13,000 to 20,000 para–lytic cases were reported annually," before the
18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, "...a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were
reported, compared with 61 in 1965." This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease
can only be attributed to the success of animal testing....show more content...
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) requires research facilities to have a certified veterinarian,"...who
shall provide adequate veterinary care." The AWA also requires animals used in research to be
presented with appropriate housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. The
regulations are promptly guarded by The Institutional Care and Use Committee. The Institutional
Care and Use Committee must ensure the appropriate handling and treatment of laboratory animals
by reviewing and inspecting every research study. If a research study is viewed as potentially
harmful to animals without reason then the Committee will close the study. The safety of test
animals are protected and monitored by federal agencies. The notion of animals being brutally kept
in hostile conditions can easily be swept away by the actions and protocols enacted by the U.S.
government. These actions and protocols are meant to ensure the humane treatment of test animals.
Another point of opposition directed towards animal testing is the belief that research on animals is
irrelevant to the beneficiary of people because animals are different from people, rendering
experiments inaccurate and useless. PETA has noted that the Food and Drug Association has
accounted, "...92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in
human trials," due to the inability of working or its potential danger.

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and
commercial testing. Descriptions of the dissection of live animals have been found in ancient
Greek writings from as early as circa 500 BC. Animal testing was regulated by the federal
government Animal Welfare Act, passed in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985. When it
comes to down to it, many people have many different ideas and thoughts about the topic. Some
people believe that it is in fact inhumane and cruel. Others believe that it is a necessity in developing
many life saving cures and treatments.
The subject of animal testing when it comes to religion is exceedingly debated. As long as there is
no unnecessary pain inflicted onto the animals and there is a real possibility of benefit to human
beings, then Jewish, Christian, and Muslim teaching allow for animal experimentation. On the other
hand, many people believe that since religious traditions, such as Hindu or Buddhism, tell us to be
merciful to animals, we should not cause them...show more content...
On one side, animal testing has contributed to many life–saving cures and treatments. Nearly every
medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. On the
other, drugs that pass animal tests aren't always safe and animal test do not reliably predict results in
human beings. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.
It's also been debated if animals really are appropriate subjects for testing. Most people believe that
animals are similar to human beings in many ways. Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with
humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans. However, many other individuals believe
that animals are in fact very different than human beings. They believe that the anatomic, metabolic,
and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human

All around the world animals are being tested on with so called "new and improved" drugs and
vaccines. One of the most common and wide known animals that are being tested on are rats and
mice. More than 100 million mice and rats are killed every year in the U.S. due to animal testing.
That means that in the time it took you to read these few short sentences about 45 mice were killed
because they were tested on with some drug or vaccine. While testing drugs and vaccines may be
convenient, efficient, and cheap, ultimately we are not considering the value of living things
therefore mice and rats should not be allowed to be tested on and new laws should be put in place
banning animal testing.
LD50 is a common test that was used on mice and rats. LD standing for "Lethal Dose," and 50
standing for "50%." They use this to test the dose that kills 50% of the test animals. For example,
some of the tests that are being done are force–feeding the mice by inserting a tube down the
esophagus into the stomach, this causes severe discomfort and extreme pain. There are ways to help
the mice feel less discomfort such as giving them anesthesia or pain relievers but in fear that it would
disturb the test results, the testers do not give the mice these pain relievers. In 1985 the
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Association came out publicly against the traditional LD50 test.
However, they came out with a new and improved LD50 test that only tested 6–10 mice and rats.
This way of testing soon was

Essay on Pros and Cons of Animal Testing
Pro Animal Testing Animal testing has become a wide contribution in medical field in order to
find new treatment, developing new medicines and improving the existing ones as well as testing
the safety and effectiveness of new medicines. Some medicines development is depending on
animal research, for instances, vaccines and insulin for diabetes and kidney transplants. However,
there are many diseases that their cures are still undiscovered yet and one of them is AIDS (Tanir,
2012). Frankie L. Trull once said in his article of Animal Test Research Has Saved Many Human
Lives, "[...] fight against cancer has seen 24 significant biomedical advances in the past 30 years.
None of them could have occurred without animal research." Therefore, this...show more content...
This is because human body system is incredibly complex.
Toxicity – Predicting the Potential Harmful Effects
Another importance of animal testing is this testing makes large contribution in toxicity; a study of
harmful effects of chemical substance on living organisms besides finding cure for human diseases
(The MSPCA–Angell, 2013). In fact, Daston, Procter and Gamble made a clarification in their
article of Alternatives in Reproductive Toxicity: A Way Forward, that animal tests are being relied
on for the prediction of potential harm of chemicals which may affect human reproductive system.
This is because, as some animals and human have identical characteristics in complex body system,
animal tests that is conducted for evaluating toxicity of reproductive are designed to apply on the
complete reproductive cycle. Those three authors also added that animal testing become a medium
for good prediction of toxicity as animal body systems are as complex as human's. Rather than
testing the chemical substances on human which is used for predicting potential harmful effects on
body system, animal testing is the most appropriate and safest medium to save human lives.
Benefits the Animals for Treatment Diseases
Animal testing is not only beneficial to human but also animals, at least to those who are not used in
the experiments, such as pets and endangered species. Along with researching for new treatments
and medicines for

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing Products
Animal testing is a cheap way for companies to test products without harming humans. It may
seem all fine and dandy, but many defenseless animals are dying for our selfish purposes. Many
beloved companies hide the fact that they harm these innocent animals. A few of those companies
are Avon, Bobbi Brown, Covergirl, EstГ©e Lauder, L'OrГ©al, M.A.C. Cosmetics and Pantene. At
first sight many may think " a few animal lives are ok to spare", but when they see how many
mainstream colossal companies are practicing these methods, they will see just how many animals
are impacted by these terrible ways. Point being, poor animals are suffering so you can have
hairspray, makeup, and many other life utilities. Is that fair? Every year 26 million animals...show
more content...
Our body shares 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for the human
body. Though many people don't agree with animal cruelty, for the use of cosmetic testing, it has
been a crucial aspect for many companies. Along with this veterinarian's study and use animal testing
as well. Animals also suffer from similar diseases as humans and many medicines are the same as
those used for human patients: examples include antibiotics, pain killers and tranquillisers.
The Cons for animal testing is poor innocent animals are being harmed, and used to develop
countless products. Over 100 million animals are being murdered each year. In animal testing,
countless animals are experimented on and then killed. Others animals are injured and will might
live the remainder of their lives in captivity, just so you can have makeup, hair products, and many
other life utilities.
In conclusion, animal testing is atrocious and dangerous. It also harms innocent animals and can
even kill them. Just because animals pass a drug test doesn't necessarily mean they are safe for
you and your body. The choice is yours to support our cause for only 60 cents a day. Not only will
it help put a stop to animal testing, but will help hospitalize, and rehabilitate the animals that have
been

The Cons of Animal Testing Essay
At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of
these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity
and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left
in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could
be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain
each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are
still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not
necessary makes animal testing unethical....show more content...
That is why people encourage scientists to analyze their entire experiment before they go through
with it. Scientists should also be able to justify the use of a number of animals in a specific
experiment. Researchers need to be able to prove animals were absolutely needed for the experiment
because many scientists have become uncertain about the reliability of the results fashioned by tests
performed on animals. Results produced by an animal do not accurately determine how a human will
react due to differences between their bodily processes, structure, and digestion. Although there are
similarities between humans and animals, there are also many differences. Animals and humans
with the same health problem may not have the same symptoms. How can an experiment on a rat to
test a cancer drug show how a human with cancer will respond to the same treatment when people
themselves react differently to identical cancer treatments? In fact the American Anti–Vivisection
Society (2013) projects nine out of ten drugs that help animals in experiments are unsuccessful when
tested on humans (Scientific Limitations of Using Animals section, para 1). It is dangerous to apply
these drugs to humans. Not only is money wasted on experiments that fall short of a cure, but people
waiting to be healed are dying when that money could be used on more promising tests. The
National Anti–Vivisection Society (2012) declares scientists have made it a routine to

Cons Of Animal Testing Research
Pros and Cons Essay
The pros
A topic that will always be discusses the testing on animals Contributes to many cures and treatments
that save many human lives.The majority of the medical breakthroughs that have happened in the
last 100 years were direct results from animal research and experimentation. The Anderson Cancer
Center animal research also associated the vaccine for Hepatitis B with experimentation on
chimpanzees. Without these experimentations, thousands, if not millions, of diabetic patients and
those with hepatitis B would have been killed every year. The same facility also said that the
chimps serve as humanity's only hope for finding a Hepatitis C vaccine.
Provides adequate living, whole body system test subject. No other living thing in this planet has the
closest anatomical structure as humans than animals. Ahuman body is extremely complex that cell
cultures in a petri dish cannot provide sufficient test results or proof that a cure or product is
effective.Testing a drug for side effects, for example, requires a circulatory system that will carry the
drug...show more content...
They are forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods,
inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even
killed through neck–breaking or asphyxiation. Some experimentation also involves using lethal
doses of certain chemicals to determine how much can kill animals. Animals make poor test
subjects.This statement is a direct contradiction from what proponents believe about how closely
related animals and humans are anatomically and biologically, because of the many metabolic,
cellular, and anatomical differences between the two species. Using rats for toxicity, for example,
must not be accepted as reliable since humans are nowhere close to being 70–kilogram

Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service Cheap

More from Paper Writing Service Cheap (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay