Relationship Between Caesar and Octavian Led to Rome's First Emperor

Relationship Between Caesar And Octavian
Octavian, the sole heir and successor of Julius Caesar overcame significant impediments in his rise to becoming Rome's first emperor. Aged only
nineteen at the time of Caesars assassination in March 44BC Octavian's intelligence and fortitude proved successful over the barriers of youth,
inexperience and the political opposition that he faced. Octavian went on to have one of the most famous political careers of all time to defeat the
Senate, Marc Antony, and gain sole control over theRoman Empire.
Before Caesars assassination Caesar and Octavian had built a powerful relationship that proved instrumental in Octavian's career. Octavian "learned a
great deal about provincial administration, warfare and political manipulation while a part ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Antony's actions after Caesars death solidified his expectations of inheriting power as he moved to take control of Caesars assets, and publically read
his will and he thought himself to be the strongest contender to carry on Caesars political legacy.
To assert political power in the Roman Empire Octavian's first action was to gain loyalty among the Roman people and build his reputation. In
Illyricum at the time of Caesars assassination he took with him a small group of friends that went to the south of Italy to visit Caesars allies and
clients. Whilst there he assessed the position in Rome and the best course of action he could take to gain control. Once in Rome he concentrated on
commemorating Caesars death and seeking vengeance against his assassins which was in contrast with Antony's views. Octavian then began to
build a relationship with the Roman mob, they were one of Caesars main power bases and very influential in the Roman Empire. To build a positive
relationship he first paid the legacies that were left to the people of Rome by Caesar. As the processing of Caesars will was held up and Antony
refused to return Caesars money Octavian pad the people out of his own pocket. This action gained loyalty and began to pave the way for a
constructive relationship between Octavian and the Roman people.
The next action that Octavian took was to undermine his political opponents, he wanted to achieve a high political position in Rome and eliminate
Marc Antony. To do
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Causes Of The Second Triumvirate
The Second Triumvirate existed from 43 B.C. to 33 B.C. The Second Triumvirate lasted for only ten years. The Second Triumvirate years were filled
with a variety of battles between the three men. Rome will fall with the new Triumvirate because the people have been deceived and have faced many
troubles, the Triumvirate has tasted power and are greedy for more, and the three men in the Triumvirate mistrust and dislike each other. The
Triumvirate stealing from the public's fortune shows their lack of morals and concern for Rome. Before the war against the conspirators started, Mark
Antony commanded Lepidus to "fetch the will" (4.1.11) in order to see how they would "cut some charge in legacies" (4.1.12). Some may say
Antony took the money to help protect the people of Rome. However, Mark Antony used the poor, naive, confused public to ensure he got revenge
on Brutus and the conspirators. Antony sparked the fire to start this war in order to get revenge and will use the people's money to get revenge, not
to protect. In addition, the Triumvirate has no respect for human life. Their lack of sympathy towards the deaths of soldiers and civilians showed their
inconsideration for them. They simply said that they "shall not live" (4.1.9) and that they are "damn[ed]" (4.1.9). Others may say that they didn't hold
significant consideration towards their death because it is normal for people to die in a war. Yet, the war was initiated by Mark Antony and his thirst
for revenge. He is the

Assess The Causes And Consequences Of The Civil War
Assess the causes and consequences of the civil war (49–45) in this period Civil war Argument in topic sentence The Roman Republic was a system of
procedures formed by tradition; there was no written constitution or legally binding legislation. Precedent and consensus set procedure creating the
parameters for acceptable behaviour. However, it was near the end of the 2nd century BC, where the system began to deteriorate and fall, ultimately
causing the civil war in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new
perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the
foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate
lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attempt to stabilise the administrative system of government and essentially
control Rome. Caesar himself ignited the civil war as a result of the unstable Roman Republic, major events such as rebellion and revolts, senate and
the political sphere and the breakdown of the triumvirate, which fuelled the motive for civil war. The corrupted Roman system alongside with personal
issues and disagreements became the catalyst for the civil war of 49 BC and consequently set the parameters for the new dictatorial Roman world.
Causes The

Rome, Pompey The Great And Julius Caesar
Pompey was among one of the greats in Roman history. He was compared to Julius Caesar, because of his military strategy and being loved and
appreciated by the Roman people. Pompey was one of the outstanding Generals the Roman Republic had seen and Statesman to the people of Rome
(Encyclopedia of World Biography). He was one of the three pieces of the first Triumvirate and the Triumvirate was a big defining moment in his life.
The Romans who formed of the Triumvirate was Julius Caesar, Pompey The Great, and Marcus Licinius Crassus. More importantly, than being a part
of Triumvirate he became consul with Crassus for one year. Eventually, he went into Civil War against one of the best Roman for the ages. The
Roman, Pompey went to war with was one of the two people of Triumvirate. Pompey opened the door to people about his Early life, his best years,
and how he died.
Pompey Early life all came into existence when he was born into a lineage with some extent known by Rome. His Father was a remarkably
successful general to Rome (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Even though his father was well known he had the regular education as any Roman
citizen("Pompey the Great."). A report said He went missing for a period of time, then he came out of hiding with three legions("Pompey the Great.").
His life embarked when he first came into the public eye when he constructed a army for the support of Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Encyclopedia of World
Biography). Sulla and him went on to campaign

Marcus Crassus : Contribution To The Fall Of The Roman...
Marcus Crassus was a Roman politician who contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. In his beginnings, he was raised in a small house with six
other people. Marrying a widowed woman he would have two children and live a well–ordered life. He was a man with vast wealth and sharp political
skills. His early success started when he allied himself with Lucius Cornelius Sulla against Marius. Following his victories, he would have a fall in
with the law before the Spartacus Rebellion. Then he would take his rightful place as a senator and a member of the First Triumvirate. Many people
don't know the name Crassus but his legacy will live on in the history books. Crassus Research Paper Marcus Licinius Crassus was born in 115 BC in
the Roman Republic. His father Publius Licinius Crassus was a commander in Iberia and consul in 97 BC. When growing up Crassus reared in a
small house with two brothers and his parents. While his parents were alive his brothers got married so they all shared the same table. This is seen to
be the main reason why Crassus was temperate and moderate in his manner in life. According to Plutarch (1916),
"The Romans, it is true, say that the many virtues of Crassus were obscured by his sole vice of avarice; and it is likely that the one vice which
became stronger than all the others in him weakened the rest" (p. 317).
This explains that Crassus's mortality was shadowed by a sole vice of greed and it weakened the rest of his mortalities. In his

Essay about Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare
Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare
In Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, the presentation and development of the relationships among the triumvirs, Caesar, Antony and Lepidus
becomes a pivotal concern. As the play progresses, the dynamics of the triumvirate changes and becomes more complicated, providing the audience
with the main political conflict that sometimes overshadows the romance of the title characters in the play. Shakespeare provides the audience with
several different images of the triumvirate through different characters.
The play's first mentioning of the triumvirate is, in essence, a masculine Roman perspective of a soldier. This is brought about through Philo and ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By the end of Act I Scene I, the audience sees two Roman soldiers, speaking with disappointment of their once great general, Mark Antony, who has
turned into a 'strumpet's fool'. Apparently enough, Antony's disregard towards the messengers from Rome, which prompts Demetrius to say 'Is
Caesar with Antonius prized so slight?' is an indication to the possible collapse of the triumvirate. Philo's comment, 'sometimes when he is not
Antony he comes too short of that great property which still should go with Antony' displays clearly Antony's failure in his duty as one of the three
emperors. The servants, on the contrary recognize Lepidus's failure in playing his role as a peace maker among the members of the triumvirate. He
is compared to 'a reed' and does not live up his position and compares his effectiveness to 'the holes where eyes should be'. It becomes clear that the
relationships among the members of the triumvirs is a cause for attention as we are introduced by Philo to Antony's disregard for Caesar's messages
and Lepidus's failure in his effort at peacemaking. The supposed strength of this union is subjected to doubts and reservations as unity among the
members is deficient.
Shakespeare also presents

Julius Caesar: The Best Dictator
More leaders should aspire to be like Julius Caesar, the Divine Julius. Despite his imperfections and early misfortunes, he went from not having
much to being the best Dictator in Rome's history. First, we will explore his life's experiences then analyze the skills which made him a great
leader. Ultimately, we will review the events which led to his death. When his father dies, Caesar became the primary provider of his family at just
sixteen years old. Caesar strived to be considered a noble. He became a High Priest and married a patrician girl, Cornelia, to align himself with a
noble family and the Populare ideology. It wasn't long before a new dictator ruled Rome, Sulla. Sulla quickly began a campaign to destroy those with...
He took calculated risks. He knew to grow his fortune and statute; he would have to fight and great risky alliances. Caesar spoke eloquently both
while addressing the Senate and his legions. He learned that communicating clearly and more efficiently was almost as important as a sword in the
battlefield. He kept his subordinates well informed at all times. He would personally deliver information to his lieutenants to avoid
miscommunication. He led by example. Caesar would not delegate unpleasant tasks. He would dine, sleep, and fight along his men. His actions not
only placed him in direct line of sight of his troops but also allowed him to identify weaknesses or problems and resolve them

What Is The Importance Of The Signification Of Julius Caesar?
Augustus
Intro
Paragraph 1 – Early days
Following the assassination of Julius Caesar by the Senators of the republic on the ideas of March in 44BC, Rome descended into a bloody civil war
which lasted a decade. Although the senators had cunningly planned the murder of Caesar, it became apparent that they did not possess the foresight to
consider who may fill the gaping power vacuum created by Caesar's absence. The conflict between Mark Antony and Octavian developed out of their
battle supremacy in their failed alliance, and the victory of either would undoubtedly have a profound effect on the Rome and its provinces, solidifying
the importance of the conflict. Unlike the unscrupulous and initial union between Caesar, Crassus and Pompey, theSecond Triumvirate was legally
recognised and binding under Treaty of Brundisium, with each triumvir assigned sectors to preside over. With an embarrassing ease, Octavian had
forced Lepidus to live out his days exiled in Africa, leaving only Mark Antony and Octavian to contest the rulership of Rome following the expiration
of the treaty in 33BC. Tensions grew between the men, as evident in Suetonius' claims that Mark Antony taunted Octavian, saying of him that "'he
could not even stand up to review his fleet when his ships were already at their fighting stations; but lay on his back and gazed up at the sky, never
rising to show that he was alive until his admiral Marcus Agrippa had routed the enemy'" The Battle of Actium

Julius Caesar Divi : The Second Triumvirate
Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus, along with being a mastered politician, he also surpassed at getting Roman people to do what he wanted them
to do voluntarily, and he managed to keep the aspect of the Republic up and running for the length of his session as an emperor. After the assassination
of his adoptive father, Julius Caesar, Octavian introduced himself in the political leadership in 44 BC. During this time, the army was loyal to their
general therefore Octavian paid all of Caesar's armed forces to transfer their loyalties over to him as Julius Caesar had already chosen Octavian as
his heir. In 43 BC, Octavian, Lepidus and Antony formed an alliance called the Second Triumvirate. One of the original aims of the Second
Triumvirate was to get rid of Caesar 's assassins, because this would help consolidating their power and position in Rome. This was the form of
dictatorship,in which the administration of the empire was shared between three people. Octavian received Italy, Africa, Sicily, and Sardinia. In 42 BC
the triumvirate avenged the death of Caesar by defeating Brutus and Cassius, who were the conspirators behind the assassination. In 36 BC, Octavian
was awarded tribunician sacrosanctity, an honor that made him indestructible inside of Rome. Occasionally, Lepidus was eliminated from the
triumvirate and was not replaced. This left the empire in the hands of Octavian and Antony who retained their triumviral power.
In favor of consolidation of Octavian's

Cicero : The Statesman And Philosopher
Cicero: The Statesman and Philosopher Cicero was a Roman statesman, lawyer, and philosopher. He did not have a set major belief in a particular
philosophy. Cicero studied under an epicurean, a stoic, and an academic. He did call himself an academic however, his theory of knowledge was
based on probability over stating certainty. He preferred it this way to help justify any contradictions in any of his works. "He usually writes as a
theist, but the only religious exaltation in his writings is to be found in the "Somnium Scipionis" ("Scipio's Dream") at the end of De republica."
(Dacre Balsdon). Cicero would call himself agnostic and his theist writing could have stemmed from the teaching of Epicureanism. I agree with the
idea of basing your theory of knowledge on probability because not everyone is 100 percent correct 100 percent of the time.
Most people would consider Cicero one of Rome 's greatest public speakers. Marcus Tullius Cicero was born in 106 BCE in Arpinium, Italy. Not much
is really known about Cicero 's heritage, for example, his mother however, "his father was a well–to–do and well–read member of the semi–noble
equestrian (or knight) class with good connections in Rome, although with no familial ties to the Roman patrician or senatorial class." (Mastin). After
serving in the military, Cicero started defending people in Rome 's courts. He likes the Roman Republic and used philosophy to tell the Roman people
his political views and to help argue for them to be

How did the 1st Triumvirate contribute to the fall of the...
The First Triumvirate between Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaius Pompeius Magnus (Pompey) and Marcus Licinius Crassus contributed to the fall of the
Roman Republic by undermining the Senate, which was unable to effectively deal with an expanding and diverse empire. This was affected by the
triumvirate appealing directly to popular assemblies, because their alliance conflicted directly with the conservative Optimates, who refused to change
with Rome's expansion. Though ultimately because each triumvir, being an ambitious general and politician was clambering for the same place; to be
top man of Rome. The very inception of the Triumvirate, and the resulting power swing it created was the beginning of the end for the Republic. By
60BC each Pompey,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once in power, Crassus and Pompey extended Caesar's time as governor of Gaul, and then chose for themselves long–term governorships, (Crassus in
Syria and Pompey in Spain). However, at the end of 55BC, Pompey did not leave for Spain, instead remaining as the only Triumvir in Rome, while
Caesar and Crassus took the heads of powerful armies. In 53BC envious of Caesar and Pompey's military victories, Crassus gathered an army and
marched on Parthia. Unable to cope with the enemy's tactics, the Roman army was slaughtered and Crassus himself killed. This and the addition of the
death of Julia (Caesar's daughter and Pompey's wife – the strongest personal link between the two) in 54BC effectively ended the triumvirate and in
doing so "became the turning point in the history of the Free State and the ultimate origin of the Roman civil war of 49BC". Soon after riots began
in Rome between Clodius and Milo, so violent that in 52BC the Senate appointed Pompey as sole consul, who immediately, following the precedent
set by Sulla upon gaining personal power, brought soldiers of his legions into the City, restoring order. In doing so the Senate had officially given
Pompey, all the powers of a dictator. Following this, the Senate passed laws stating, 'a consul had to wait 5 years after his office before he could
receive a govern ship', the second that 'all candidates for office had to

Summary Of The Interlopers And The Machine That Won The War
The Interlopers and The Machine That Won the War are two short stories that have many differences, but have a few similarities as well. The
Interlopers is a short tale depicting a feud between two young men, Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym. Georg believes that the land currently
under Ulrich's name actually belongs to him, therefore steals game from Ulrich's land just to spite him (Saki 82–83). After confronting each other, it is
made clear that they both wish to take the other's life (83). Suddenly, a bolt of lightning struck a nearby tree, causing it to pin both men to the ground
(84). The Machine That Won theWar portrays the story of three men,
Lamar Swift, John Henderson, and Max Jablonsky, who are discussing Earth's victory in the war against the planet Deneb (Asimov 1). Everyone
believes that an ingenious computer called
Multivac won the war, until Henderson, Jablonsky, and Swift admit that they didn't trust the information and changed it until they thought it appeared
to be accurate (1–4). Differences in these stories include: characters, settings, and wrong–doings. A few similarities consist of the reasons for actions
explained in the stories, and what the characters rely on to make decisions and solve problems. Through showing differences and similarities, it will be
made clear that stories like this that seem to have nothing alike can be related.
First of all, The Interlopers and The Machine That Won the War have very different characters and settings which

Beowulf: The Slayer Of Triumvirate Evil
David Francisco
Jones 1
Beowulf Essay
17 September 2014
Beowulf: The Slayer of Triumvirate Evil
Epic literature is revealing by how it portrays and is contributed by those who produce it and reflects societal values. Before Beowulf was composed
by an unknown Anglo–Saxon poet around 700 A.D. The Epic was passed down orally through generations of people as each person added their say
into the story. Corresponding to actual historical people, the action that takes place within Beowulf takes place in 500 A.D. This oral story is most likely
to have changed from the very original as the story was most likely affected by the likes of Christian and Pagan views. Beowulf within the story is set
up as a usual Epic hero as he has the qualities of bravery, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Beowulf fights Grendel, his men at first hold him back and keep him from leaving, but it was the hero Beowulf confronts and fights Grendel
and lacerates his arm off. Then Beowulf going along the bottom of the lake alone within a great mead hall then fights Grendel's mother which signifies
feuding within the storyline. The author states, "No help or backing was to be had then / from his high–born comrades; that hand–picked troop / broke
ranks and ran for their lives" (Beowulf 2595–2597). When his comrades essentially dessert him and being forced to fight losing this battle all to
himself. The last similarity is that Beowulf fights each battle alone. When Beowulf fought Grendel, his men held him back and kept him from leaving,
but it was Beowulf who actually fights him and tore his arm off. When he fights Grendel's mother, he goes alone. He was in the bottom of the lake in a
great battle

How Did Octavian Loyal To The Name Of Julius Caesar?
Because Octavian had the name of Caesar, a legion compiled of Julius Caesar's veterans were loyal to him however he could not use them unless he
gained imperium. Although Augustus disliked Brutus and did not want to associate with the conspirators who had assassinated his newly adopted
father, he knew that he had to support the Senate so that they would appoint him pro–praetor. The senate needed Octavian's legions to help them fight
Mark Antony in Mutina therefore they allowed him to become the youngest pro–praetor so that he could gain imperium to use the legions. Although
Mark Antony was defeated at Mutina in 43BC, the senate's consuls were killed during the battle leaving the remaining legions in the control of
Octavian. When the senate ordered Octavian to hand the command of their legions to Decimus Brutus, Octavian refused taking permanent command of
them for himself with the justification that they would refuse to fight under the command of those who conspired against Julius Caesar. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mutina was essentially where Octavian showed the senate and the world that he was a young man who not only deserved the name of Caesar but
was also a man who was equal to the respected Mark Antony. With the threat of eight legions, Octavian claimed consulship as the senate voted for him
in fear that they would march on Rome if he was not elected. The battle of Mutina in 43BC allowed Octavian, using his clever wits, to start as
pro–praetor in his political career and ending up in the most powerful position in Rome with the control of the most powerful army rather than being
thrown away by the senate after they had used him to defeat Mark Antony. Without the victory, Octavian may never have achieved the prestige
necessary to be looked upon as Caesar's

The Three Powerful Men In The Triumvirate In Ancient Rome
A triumvirate is a group of three powerful people who rule an area. The agreement can be written or unwritten. The three people would, theoretically
have an equal say on dealing in the territory, in this case, Rome. However, one person usually stood out in the group as the leader. In Ancient Rome,
there were 2 triumvirates. The First Triumvirate was formed in 60 B.C. to share the power and make each person more powerful than before. The three
men in the triumvirate were Julius Caesar, Marcus Licinius Crassus, and Pompey the Great. Caesar was elected consul in Gaul, where he became very
successful. Following the death of Crassus, a rivalry between the Caesar and Pompey erupted. The Senate ordered Caesar to disband his army and
return to Rome.

Why Was Julius Caesar Bad
Julius Caesar was one of the greatest rulers in the ancient world. Most people don't believe this because the senate made Caesar seem like a bad
person even though he wasn't. He helped the people of Rome and his allies. When Rome was in ruins he helped rebuilt it to make it better. He
even gave the poor new lives overseas. People always focused on his wrong doings instead of his good deeds. The senator's undying jealousy for
Caesar caused him many problems and made him misunderstood. He was the true savior of Rome. In Rome, two consuls ruled for a year. Caesar
was elected for consul and the other consul was Bibulus. Caesar spoke on behalf of the lower and middle class of Rome. Bibulus spoke on behalf of
the upper class. Caesar noticed the Senate wasn't very fond of him, so he created the triumvirate. The triumvirate was an alliance that benefited all its
members. It consisted of Caesar, Crassus, and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He made many reforms to make Rome a better place. Rome had a great amount of cheap land in Northern Africa and new lives were presented to
the poor overseas. Cities were rebuilt as colonies for Rome and soldiers were given farms. Caesar introduced a new tax system and cut debts by 25
percent. He wanted Rome to be focused on education so he gave teachers privileges. Caesar took advice from the Egyptians and added four extra
months to the year 46 to create a new calendar. His most significant policy was when he extended citizenship to the Gauls and the inhabitants of
many towns. These people got extra civil right and some benefits of the empire. Even though he created all these reforms the senators were still
unhappy with him. They shared power in the Roman republic but each senator wanted all the power. The senators were scared Caesar was going to
name himself king. Caesar tried to find a way to keep the Senators happy, but it was too late. Their jealousy grew too powerful and they assassinated

Differences Between The Second Triumvirate
Prior to the formation of the second Triumvirate, Julia Caesar had been brutally assassinated, which plunged Rome into another Civil War. The second
triumvirate was formed when the Lex titia was passed in 43BC, making the position of Anthony, Lepidus and Octavian the highest constitutional office
in the Roman state. As Scullard stated, "In place of the dictator Caesar, there were now three dictators." The second Triumvirate was created to
strengthen political control and used their power to legally hunt down those who had conspired to kill Caesar. This resulted in Civil War between the
Second Triumvirate and Brutus and Cassius at the Battle of Phlipii 42, which undermined the authority of the Senate as most leaders died in battle.
Eventually,

First Triumvirate Essay
Cassus, Pompey, and Caesar all got together and made the first triumvirate because they all had claims to the throne, and splitting power equally
solved many disputes. However, the First Triumvirate worked mostly behind the scenes. Crassus and Pompey both died, leaving Caesar in charge of
all of the Roman Empire. After Caesar was assassinated, Pompey and Cassus were both sent to war and killed abroad. The Second Triumvirate was
made of Octavian, Marc Antony, and Lepidus. These three men were pretty much emperors and were given highest power. Marc Antony fell in love
with Cleopatra VII, and he moved to Alexandria to be with her. The Triumvirate then split the Roman Empire into three: Octavian took the West,
Antony took the East, and Lepidus made do... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Essay Two Not many offices were held by the lower Roman class, the plebians. Most higher offices were held by the patricians, or the aristocrats.
Several offices were open to the plebs, however. Tribunes were officials elected to represent the plebians under the magistrates. The office of aedile
(the person who maintained public buildings and organized festivals) was also an option. A pleb could also become a praetor (a general and mayor
rolled into one) or a quaestor (a financial supervisor). However, you couldn't just be elected into any given office with no experience. The cursus
honorum was a system that allowed you to advance through the ranks, kind of like how American presidents are usually governors, then senators, and
then elected president. However, success could be dangerous in Roman politics. The Gracchi were two brothers who were both elected to be tribunes,
and they tried to pass legislation to take wrongfully–acquired land from the patricians, and put it back in the hands of the original plebian owners. Both
brothers were assassinated for their

Role Of Julius Caesar In The Gaul
Julius Caesar's role in the Gaul had a large impact in many aspects of his career such as the military, wealth and influence on Rome and political
power. Julius Caesar was a Roman politician who turned the Roman republic into the powerful Roman Empire. Caesar overthrew the Roman
republic and founded the rule of the emperors. In this period Caesar used the problems to his advantage and created his own supreme political and
military power, gaining the trust of Rome and building his army. Caesar is well known throughout the whole world as one of the most powerful and
successful leaders that has ever lived. In his young years, his father had a major impact on him, as he had political success, and the family has a
history in politics, which had helped Caesar in starting out in politics. Julius Caesar's first important political success had occurred in 63b.c.e when
Caesar was appointed the role of Chief Religious office in Rome; this had set him up for future political roles. Caesar was very strategically and had
many tactics to how he would rule; he always wanted more glory and political and military opportunities and would overcome all challenges he
faced. In 59B.C.E Caesar won an election to become consul, the senate then assigned him to lands that gave Caesar no opportunities for military
exaltation, as he did not want Caesar to succeed. Caesar realised he would need more allies to overcome his opponents in the senate. He then formed
the alliance that was known as the 'First Triumvirate' with the Roman General Pompey who brought wealth and military success. During Caesar's rule
he gained a lot of military success due to how he led his army
Military during Caesar's rule was a high contribution of his success. Military success was important to Julius Caesar as it gave him wealth to
succeed in Roman politics. It was important was important for Caesar because it gives him enormous power in the military; this means his army
would be big and strong and would be able to protect Caesar. Success in a war gave Caesar more glory and brought more wealth to him, and made
Caesar rise more to fame. In Rome political success brought opportunities for military command, as Julius Caesar already had much political power, his

Similarities Between Abraham Lincoln And Julius Caesar
How are Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar alike? They were both assassinated, but they have more in common than that. We are going to find out
what Julius Caesar Abraham Lincoln have in common. To do this, we must first know about their life independent. I will start with Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln was born February 12, 1809, in Hardin County, Kentucky. During his childhood and early life him and his family moved 3 in their
life. In was at one of these homesteads that Lincoln lost his mother. His father remarried a widow who had three children herself. His new step–mother
provided Abraham more affection and guidance than his parent ever did. Abraham and his father had a very strained relationship; it only got worse
when Abraham started reading.
On September 9, 1936, Abraham got his license ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar ruled a Country. Both of their rules was cut short by their assassination. Julius Caesar ruled Rome for a year
before his assassination. Abraham Lincoln had just started his second term before he was killed.
Abraham and Julius both greatly impacted their countries. Caesar put more focused on the lower and middle classes of Rome. Lincoln help
demolished slavery. Many people looked up to them because of that.
Both come from poor backgrounds. Lincoln's family were poor farmers who moved several times throughout his childhood. Caesar's family were also
poor despite being related to Roman aristocrats. Neither of them let this discourage them.
Lincoln and Caesar were involved in wars. Lincoln protected and supported the Union during the civil war. Caesar was a soldier in many wars. Both
were victorious in their wars.
Lincoln and Caesar have many things common, despite the time different in their life. We have cover what they have in common and the tragic end
they both shared. Lincoln and Caesar will remain a big part of our life, even though they are

Octavian and Marc Antony- The Duel of Words and Deeds
Octavian and Marc Antony– The Duel of Words and Deeds Following the Julius Caesar's death at the hands of the Senate, Octavian and Marc Antony
propelled themselves to the pinnacle of Roman power. First joining together during the Second Triumvirate, these men represented the true power
players of Roman politics. As their alliance fractured, both Romans resorted to propaganda to gain an edge over the other. Through insulting the other
and polishing their own image, both Antony and Octavian looked to capture absolute Roman dominance. Even before their eventual war in 32 B.C.E.,
the men engaged in a duel of words in deeds. This paper will first overview the formation and disintegration of Second Triumvirate between Marc
Antony, Marcus Lepidus, and Octavian. Its main portion will divulge the devious propaganda, leading up to the war in 32 B.C.E., used by Marc
Antony and Octavian to destroy the other politically. Plutarch's Antony and Suetonius' The Lives of the Caesars– The Deified Augustus(De Vita
Caesarum – Divus Augustus) will serve as our main guide to this war of image. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, Marcus Lepidus,
and Octavian met in October 43 BC to join together, rule the entire government of Rome, and the control the Roman provinces. In power, they were
equal to the consuls and had the right to select magistrates. The triumvirs' mission, during their first five year term, can be broken down into three
objectives: to "pursue and punish the

Erucius Argumentative Essay
I was asked to be in the First Triumvirate this morning. So many thoughts are rushing through my head now. Why would Ceaser want me in the
First Triumvirate if I wanted him dead? Why would they make something so unconstitutional? Why would Pompey join such a horrific group? Now,
you are probably wondering how did I get here and how did this all start, well this is where it begins... I believe it all began when I was in my first
legal case. I successfully argued my first legal case defending a man charged with I parricide. When the trial began Erucius gave a long speech about
the case, although I would say it was slightly biased my charisma will easily persuade the crowd into thinking that Roscius is innocent...(https:/
/archive.org/stream/jstor–4387008/4387008_djvu.txt)... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
My friends tried long and hard to get me back into Rome, and the finally did. Now I can get back into politics (http://www.notablebiographies.com
/Ch–Co/Cicero–Marcus–Tullius.html).
6 Months Later
For the past six months I have been trying to separate Pompey from the rest of the Triumvirate, and today he finally told me to stop. I believe my next
steps are trying to start working in the fields of philosophy and writing (http://www.notablebiographies.com/Ch–Co/Cicero–Marcus–Tullius.html).
9 Years Later I am extremely disappointed, The Second Triumvirate was just formed two days ago. One of my major concerns is that I am on their
watch list. I am also hearing rumors that the Triumvirate is planning on exiling

Western Civilization Q&A
Western Civ. Test 2 take home
C) First and Second Triumvirates
A Triumvirate is a political alliance involving three rulers, who divide the land and power among each other. The first Triumvirate involved
Pompey; who was a popular general who crushed the Spanish Revolt. The second was Crassus; he was a wealthy noble with a lot of ambition and
was very ruthless. Crassus owned all the fire stations in Rome, when a person needed his services he would let the fire burn until he was paid a sum
of money to his likings. Crassus was unsuccessful in his military pursuits. The third was Julius Caesar; he was also a wealthy noble. He was very
popular with the lower class. For a short period Caesar was the Governor of Spain, when he returned he was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He taught equality, which was very popular among the lower class. The Roman governments strongly opposed his teachings because he was gaining a
strong influence over the lower and middle class, this was becoming detrimental to the Roman Empire. Pontius Pilot ordered for Jesus to be crucified
to support peace. After his death, followers of Jesus created what is known today as the "church". Another way that spread Christianity was the
practice of Evangelism; created by Paul, one of Jesus' followers, which is spreading the word of God and Jesus' teachings. Paul was the universal
voice for Christians. Paul also spread his teachings to Gentiles, who are non–Jews. These strategies helped spread Christianity quickly, and among more
groups of people. One of the most significant events in spreading Christianity was at a Jewish festival in Jerusalem, this event contained many people
from around the world, this was a great opportunity to help spread the word of Christianity. Christianity struggled for acceptance among the Roman
Government. They were essentially ignored, being barred from offices and politics. By the third century Christianity had settled in Italy and Judea.
Many Roman rulers persecuted Christians, under Diocletian they weren't even considered human, and outlawed from the Roman Empire. Diocletian
claimed Christians as reprehensible for the fall of the Roman Empire. When Diocletian retired, Constantine took

Marcus Aurelius Essay
Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius was born on April 26th, 121 AD. He was born as Marcus Annius Verus. His family was a very wealthy family who claimed that
they were descendants of Numa, The Second King of Rome. His father was Annius Verus and his mother was Domitia Lucilla. During his childhood
Marcus studied Stoic Philosophy. Stoic Philosophy deals with the teachings of living simply and being down to Earth and logical about situations.
Marcus wrote about this philosophy in his book Meditations. Also during his childhood Hadrian had appointed Marcus to equestrian rank, at the age
of six. Then at the age of eight he was appointed Priest of Salian. During his youth he was called "Verissimus", by Hadrian, which means genuine or
true. After the death of his father, Marcus Aurelius was adopted by his grandfather,Annius Verus. His grandfather was a city prefect under Hadrian.
This required him to watch over the city , during the absence of the emperor. His grandfather was also a consul three times.
He was later adopted by His uncle, Antoninus Pius. He was also Hadrian's successor, but Hadrian's original successor was L. Ceionius Commodus,
but he died before he could succeed him. His uncle was married to his aunt, who was know as Annia Galeria Faustina. Because Marcus was adopted
by his uncle, this allowed him ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Than in 162 AD the Parthians invaded Syria, which was part of the Roman Empire. He thought that due to the death of Pius, this would leave the
empire vulnerable, and weak. Lucius was sent to stop the envision, but when they got there he had left his three generals in charge while he went to go
enjoy himself at the headquarters located in Antioch. The three generals where Statius Priscus, Avidius Cassius, and Martius Verus, the most notable
was Avidius Cassius. He was a well know politician and military leader who was familiar with the syrian

The First Triumvirate
The First Triumvirate The first triumvirate was and alliance between three prominent politicians, Crassus, Pompey and Julius Caesar. The Roman
historian Livy described the First Triumvirate as 'a conspiracy against the state by its three leading citizens'. The agreement was unofficial and private.
It was formed in the summer of 60–59 B.C. The first triumvirate however is a bit misleading in name. Not only was it never called that by the
contemporary Romans, but it was a far more inclusive factio (faction) than the term triumvirate implies. How and why the first triumvirate was created:
В·Crassus and Pompey had been colleagues in the past, they shared consulship in 70 B.C. but never liked each other, and it was only through Julius...
She had been the personal tie between Caesar and Pompey, who were by now already drifting apart. Caesar offered Pompey another wife, his
grandniece Octavis. Pompey refused, instead choosing to marry Cornelia Metella, daughter of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Scipio, one of Caesar's
greatest enemies in 52 B.C. This emphasized Pompey's drift away from Caesar towards the optimates. The Death of Crassus Crassus got Syria for
his proconsular service in 54 B.C. Desperate for military glory He even left his term as consul to undertake a military campaign against the
Parthians. His ambiation outran his ability. After early success his army was completley destroyed at Carrhae by Parthian archers in 53 B.C.
during which Crassus was murdered. This left just Pompey and Caesar to rule Rome, and Carssus death created a rivalry between the two that
could not be broken. The Rivalry between Crassus and Pompey Caesar's successes in Gaul, along with his growing power and wealth, drove
Pompey. While Caesar was fighting in Gaul, Pompey proceeded with a legislative agenda for Rome, which revealed that he was now covertly allied
with Caesar's enemies. Pompey also made it clear that Caesar would not be permitted to stand for Consul unless he turned over control of his armies.
This would, of course, leave Caesar defenseless before his enemies. Pompey was elected consul without colleague in 52. The

Julius Caesar Reputation Analysis
Julius Caesar – The Introduction
Each man believed that the other attempted to increase his own reputation at his colleague's price. In 59 BC Caesar tried out to reconcile both men and
then blended their power along with his own to obtain himself elected consul. He provided Julia his daughter to Pompey in matrimony to solidify his
alliance. The alliance put together Caesar's enormous level of popularity and legal reputation with Crassus's fantastic prosperity and effect and
Pompey's evenly spectacular military reputation.
Background and Early life 12th july 100 BC, the date of birth of Gaius Julius Caesar. His family had noble, patrician root. They were not that rich or or
influential in this period. His aunt Julia, was the wife of Gaius ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He returned to Rome in 60 BC, enthusiastic for the consulate. Against the senatorial opposition he organised a faction which was called the First
Triumvirate, It was made up of Marcus Licinius Crassus, richest man in Rome, Pompey, who was a general and a commander chief in the army,
and the organizer himself Caesar. After joining Pompey and Crassus had conflict between each other and were jealous of each other, , but Caesar
handled it all and kept the arrangement going. Caesar married Calpurnia in 59 BC. As being a consul, he guaranteed the passing of an agrarian laws
providing Campanian lands for 20,000 poor people and veterans, regardless of the opposition of his senatorial colleague, Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus.
Caesar also earned the support of the prosperous equites by obtaining a reduction for them in their duty deals in Asia. This made him the guiding
ability in a coalition between people and plutocrats. He was assigned the rule of Cisalpine and Transalpine Gaul and Illyricum with four legions for
five years (58 B.C.–54 B.C.). The dissimilarities between Pompey and Crassus grew, and Caesar again transferred (56 B.C.) to patch up things,
coming to an arrangement that both Pompey and Crassus should be consuls in 55 B.C. which their proconsular provinces should be Syria and Spain,
respectively. Out of this set up an expansion was attracted by him of his demand in Gaul to 49 B.C. In the entire year's 58 B.C. to 49 B.C. he

Taking a Look at the Second Triumvirate
The Second Triumvirate was a "formal magistracy legally appointed which could dominate the Senate and the State" (Scullard) and would prove to be
the final straw in an already failed Republican system. The Roman Republic was ruled by a Constitution, which relied on a balance of three elements;
The Senate; the Magistrates; the Assemblies. When the balance was upset either by ambitious magistrates, armies or tribunes then civil war was the
result. The Senate proved ineffectual in preventing the Second Triumvirate from unbalancing this concept thus the played a significant role in the
Republic's fall. The Second Triumvirate, like those before them, had been able to take advantage of a vulnerable Senate to achieve their own personal
aims in defiance of the Senate. The lack of faith in the Senate, which was present for this period of time, was what granted the Second Triumvirate to
be the final push in the fall of the Republic. The Sullan legacy continued to be displayed in unlawful acts conducted by this three–man rule. Marc
Antony, Octavian, and Lepidus all knew the significance of having an army at their hands and wealth that would ensure two things for them, power
and civil war at the hands of conflict. It is therefor known that the Second Triumvirate played a significant role in the fall of an already fallen Republic.
In the place of the dictator Caesar, Rome had now appointed three dictators who would prove to destroy a system in turmoil. " Thus, a single dictator
had

Fall of the Roman Republic Julius Caesar Essay
There are many contributions to the fall of the roman republic. Three of the main ones can be linked to the Actions and legacy of Sulla, Caesars
military campaigns and Caesars dictatorship. The decline of the Republic began in the middle of the second century B.C. with political, economic, and
social events. These events in addition to the burdens of civil war on Rome, lead to the inevitable failure of the Republic.
The first contribution to the fall of the roman republic is linked to the actions and legacy of Sulla. Sulla had a high political position because he raised
an army over the Italian rebels. Using his position he marched on Rome and had the senate outlaw marius. He then went east to fight Mithradates, an
eastern king. Marius ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another contribution to the fall of the roman republic is Julius Caesar. Caesar was neither the only man responsible for the fall, nor the one man who
could stop it, but his role in the final demise is undeniable. Different events Caesar played were not a result of seeking power but as how to humiliate
the senate.
Julius Caesar's triumph in a civil war in the 40s BC made him the absolute ruler of Rome he rose to power through his social status, financial support,
military leadership, and political reputation. Caesar became the proprietor in Spain, where he gained some military experience and wealth. Upon
returning to Rome in 60 BC he joined Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate, a trio of political leaders.
The other two triumvirs agreed to grant Julius Caesar the office of consul in 59 BC. He was appointed the governor of Roman Gaul in 58 BC and
built up an army there. Caesar marched north into Gaul and defeated the Helvetii. Caesar's military contributions to the empire were significant, but
he destroyed the Republic with his civil wars. His march on Rome exploited the precedent of Sulla, whose own march was due to far more legitimate
political issues. Caesar simply didn't want to be prosecuted for the innumerable laws he broke during his consulship, and so refused to lay down his
arms when ordered by the Senate and People of

The Downfall Of Julius Caesar
Augustus paper
In his seventy sixth year Julius Caesar was assassinated by several senators on August 19, 14 CE. (Mellor 1). After Julius Caesar's death, Antony
(one of Caesar's closest advisors) was expected to rule after him, but little did anyone know that Caesar was very fond of his nephew who voyaged
with him on several missions and secretly adopted this fellow who went by the name of Gaius Octavius. (Mellor 6) Octavius would soon go by the name
Augustus and become one of the greatest leaders to have ruled ancient Rome. Augustus ruler of Rome formulates a monarchical government in spite of
Romans' dislike of a monarchy without being assassinated like his grandpa Julius Caesar by maintaining a strong military system, gradually changing
the constitution, and spending his money and time wisely. Augustus was a man of strong brutality and strength, one of the strong points in aiding his
rise as emperor was his military control. Augustus differed greatly from Julius Caesar in the relationships between him and his enemies. While Julius
Caesar would try to befriend his foes after defeating them, Augustus is more unforgiving and instantly tries to eliminate them. Julius Caesar only
eliminated the major enemies that he deemed most threatening but, after he succeeded in defeating them, he made the mistake of looking past other
past potential enemies. Augustus learned from Caesar's mistakes. Augustus knew that he could easily be killed by the same assassins that killed his

Factors That Led To The Fall Of The Roman Republic
Three ideals and traditions of the Roman Republic, lust for power, greed, and loyalty, each contributed to the collapse of the Republic. Desire for
power played a major role in the collapse of the Republic because Caesar, the man who arguably began the Republic's downfall, marched on Rome
because he wanted power. The second ideal that led to the Republic's collapse was greed and the power of money, for example bribing officials in
Rome, Crassus' shocking alliance with Caesar, and Pompey's strategy to fight Caesar during the first civil war. The last ideal that aided the downfall
of the Republic was loyalty, specifically citizens' loyalty to political leaders or military generals, loyalty between generals and their veterans, and
loyalty between political leaders.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before the collapse of the Republic, Sulla, a roman patrician, declared himself dictator and used proscription lists, a list of people posted in the
forum who were declared enemies of the state, to maintain his power. This example shows how lust for power was inherent and already
destructive in the Republic, prior to its collapse. Similar to lust for power, greed could be found within the Republic before its collapse. For
example, patricians, aristocrats, would buy farmland from plebeians who were serving in the army, and they used the land to increase their wealth.
Lastly, loyalty was viewed as an important aspect of the Republic, specifically loyalty to politicians, family, and the Republic's beliefs. Most Roman
households had some allegiance to a certain politician and would support that politician despite their own personal beliefs. These three ideals of the
Republic were established and followed long before the collapse of the Republic, and all three grew into destructive forces that caused the collapse of
the

The Battle Of The Second Triumvirate
The Battle of Philippi was the last fought battle of the wars of the second Triumvirate. These wars were a fight between the forces of Marc Antony
and Octavian of the Second Triumvirate, and the forces of Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus. Brutus and Cassius were the
assassinators of Julius Caesar, Marc Antony and Octavian were very close allies withJulius Caesar and Octavian would become the heir to his throne
after the assassination. Because of this, Marc Antony and Octavian would wage a war against Brutus and Cassius to avenge their ally Julius Caesar.
Immediately following the assassination of Caesar, Brutus and Cassius fled to Italy to take control of the Eastern provinces. The three main Caesarian
leaders, Antony,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the arrival of Republican admiral Gnaeus Domitus Ahenobarbus, communications back to Italy were made very difficult because of the large
fleet of ships that he brought with him which blockaded the triumvirate. These fleets of the Liberators did not wish to engage in a physical battle with
the Triumvirate, but only to block their communications with their supply base back in Italy. With this swarming fleet they were able to outflank the
Triumvirate and set up their own defensive positions forcing Norbanus and Saxa to retreat from their positions moving west giving the Liberators the
upper hand at this spot. Brutus and Cassius were able to gain position on the Via Egnatia on each side with this fleet. To the north and south were
impassable marshes and mountains. Brutus and Cassius then split their forces each manning a North and South defensive position of the Via Egnatia.
After arriving to the scene, Marc Antony put his troops to the south while Octavian put his troops to the north, preparing for battle with the Liberators.
Marcus Junius Brutus was always known in history as being too soft of a general. Although he had little successful battle victories in Thrace and
Lycia, he had always been judged as being lacking in authority when it came to the generalship of his troops. Because of this, Brutus was commonly
referred to as a statesman than a military commander. The other Liberator commander, Gaius

The Great Triumvirate : American History
The Great Triumvirate
By
Jessica L. Caswell
American History to 1877
HIST101
Dr. Brett F. Woods
March 16, 2015 Everyone thinks that Abraham Lincoln was America's most fervent supporter of preserving the Union, but while Lincoln was still a
boy, there were three politicians leading the charge to keep the Union from fracturing. These three political giants were celebrities in their time and
their names are: Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun. Their differences ran the gamut and they more often worked against each other
than with each other, but each of the men was deeply patriotic and ambitious. They all at one point in their careers served in the Senate and as the
Secretary of State. Each of them ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His debates became the stuff of legends and for days afterward, newspapers would scramble to print as much of the debate as they could. Webster, an
ardent supporter of the Constitution and national unity said, "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable." The third man in the Great
Triumvirate was a South Carolinian Senator named John C. Calhoun. Of the three, he gained the highest political title as Vice President under John
Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. Calhoun's loyalty to the Union was second only to his loyalty to South Carolina. In the beginning of his
political career, he fought for the Union to stay together, but when it became a choice between his home state or the Union, he chose South Carolina.
Calhoun did not desire secession, though. In his mind, disunion would equal failure. In 1812, war was on the horizon. The "warhawks" led by Henry
Clay and John Calhoun were pushing Madison to a war with Britain. "What are we not to lose by peace," Clay said in response to the anti–war critics.
"Commerce, character, a nation's best treasure, honor!" America went to war in spite of the New England states threatening secession. Eleven months
after the start of the war, Webster was elected to Congress and while he was decidedly against the war; once it

Julius Caesar Character Analysis
The thought of having any sort of significant power may institute a different reaction amongst people. Certain individuals might be frightened at the
imagination of it, while others might be excited; it really differs from person to person. In Shakespeare's writing, it can be seen as a focal point meant
to provoke the thoughts of readers. It is used to show development in the story. Throughout William Shakespeare'sJulius Caesar, Mark Antony's
character is used to demonstrate how the presence or absence of power can completely change one's motives and morals by showing him under
different circumstances in which his position regarding authority impacts his demeanor. When he first appears in Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is very
humble. He does not attempt to order others around and does not expect others to do everything he says. In fact, he is the one advising others,
specifically Caesar. Antony is much more respectful and obedient when he is not in a position of power. He states that "When Caesar says 'Do this,'
it is perform'd" (I.ii.13). Not only because Caesar is in a higher position than him, but because he himself has not as much control over things, he does
exactly what Caesar tells him to do without arguing or objecting. Along with this, he displays his veneration for Caesar by implying that Caesar is
such an important figure that only his words can cause something to occur immediately. Through this quote, it can be seen that Antony knows where
authority lies. In the near future, Antony can be observed trying to help Caesar once again: "Fear him not, Caesar; he's not dangerous;" (I.ii.203). This
behaviour of assisting Caesar is a result of not possessing a high position of authority. Because Antony is not technically in charge of many people, he
acts accordingly: as a courteous and self–effacing individual. Here, his only intention is to advise, and possibly comfort, Caesar. Not at all does he put
himself above Caesar, but rather he puts himself in a personal position to serve him. Although he is gracious at the start of the play, once there is a
sudden absence of great power within Rome, his demeanor is completely altered. The power vacuum in Rome causes Antony to realize that there is an
opportunity

Analysis Of Lone Survivor
Lone Survivor: Mission First Every soldier in the ARMY of the United States of America knows the following phrase from the Soldier's Creed: "I
will always place the mission first" (ARMY.mil). The aforementioned is arguably the most powerful line in the Soldier's Creed and exists in
different variants across the branches of the military. The life of a soldier is not an easy one, so it is to be expected that there will be times that a
soldier will have to make difficult decisions. Sometimes these decisions will dictate between life and death. However, the Soldier's Creed and
other oaths alike, are promises not only to one's country and those serving beside you, but also an agreement with oneself to carry the weight of
what it takes to fulfill his/her country. In the movie, Lone Survivor, four Navy Seals made the decision to spare the lives of three men which
ultimately resulted in the death of three of the four Seals and 16 rescuers. I believe that the decision they made contradicted the idea of "mission
first" and a more aggressive decision should have been elected. The elite squad of Seals neglected to place the mission first when the two goat
herders and a boy were released. The release of these three men was outrageously dangerous and a complete sabotage to the mission–at–hand. They did
not want to kill the men because it was not "the right thing to do", and also ruled against tying the men to trees and gagging them as they were scared
they would be eaten by wolves. In

Essay about Julius Caesar
Mark Antony, in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was a brave, intelligent, pleasure
–loving, and cunning man. He was loyal to his friend, Caesar,
whom he considered a true friend. He looked at life as a game in which he had a signified part to play, and played that part with excellent refinement
and skill.
Antony was devoted and preferred to be dependent upon Julius Caesar since he rather have enjoyed life than to claim the highest position in the
government. He wanted the crown to be given to Caesar so that all conflicts could be avoided. However, this additional power contributed to the
conspirator's motive to assassinate him. Antony was distraught with Caesar's death and sought revenge first by speaking to the crowd in his ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, he felt his duty was to carry on Caesar's reign and clear his name. Therefore he joined the Second Triumvirate and became a great leader.
Antony was looked down upon by all the conspirators except for Brutus. They wanted to kill Antony as well as Caesar because they feared that he
would become as powerful as him and possibly a dictator. Brutus persuaded the others not to add to the assassination by saying, "And for Mark
Antony, think not of him: for he can do no more than Caesar's arm when Caesar's head is off"(2.1.181–183). Brutus underestimated Antony and
perceived him as a person who didn't always take life seriously, couldn't have a serious nature and therefore, not a thinker. Brutus continued to argue
with Cassius who did not believe him. "Alas, good Cassius, do not think of him. If he love Caesar, all that he can do is to himself –– take
thought and die for Caesar. And that were much he should, for he is given to sports, to wildness, and much company (2.1.185–189). Brutus judged him
as being frivolous, and simply liking sport and partying, with a reputation for womanizing. Unfortunately for Brutus and the conspirators he was
respected by Caesar and so simply couldn't be ignored.
Caesar respected Antony, and his way of life. He defended him when he said, "See! Antony, that revels (makes merry) long a
–nights, is
notwithstanding (however) up. Good morrow, Antony" (2.4.116–117).

Marcus Tuly Research Paper
Marcus Tullius Cicero or commonly known as Cicero, was a major Roman philosopher in late 50 BC. Cicero, or Tully as some refer to him as, was
a lawyer, politician, orator, poet and so much more during his era(Wikipedia). Tully was born January 3rd, 106 BC, in Arpinum of the Roman
Republic. Arpinum is currently Lazio of Italy, Tully and his younger brother Quintus was raised by their mother Helvia and father, Marcus Tullius
Cicero It is common to see sons named after their fathers at roman time(TheFamousPeople). As far as geniuses go, Cicero is perhaps the greatest noble
of the Roman Republic in his time.
Out of Cicero's many achievements, was that of when he worked as a politician and Consul. At a young age Tully began to read throughout... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But Cicero believed that money had no value, the only thing that was important was proper pleasure, reason and virtue. Power and approval meant
nothing to Marcus and the stoic teachings he read. These teachings were somewhat based off of Democritus's theory, that everything was made up
of atoms and no God existed(Clayton, Edward). Edward Clayton also mentions that Cicero made six paradoxes. "The beliefs discussed are as
follows: moral worth is the only good; virtue is sufficient for happiness; all sins and virtues are equal; every fool is insane; only the wise man is
really free; only the wise man is really rich"(Clayton, Edward). These writings are his arguments on his views of Stoicism. Though Cicero didn't
believe in a Godly figure he does mention why religion is healthy. "Religion was useful because it helped to control human behavior and could be
used as a tool for public policy; and in this context divination could be useful too (as when an unwise political decision was prevented by the
announcement that the omens were unfavorable)(Clayton Edward). To a surprise, Cicero believed in free will, but never on fate.When
circumstances arrive, and his stoic beliefs, he acknowledges that humans have a divine right to free will; even as stoic teachings clearly state that its
followers must overcome emotions. Assumptions were proven true as free will seems to be a second strength for Roman civilization. Marcus took
kindly to his growing ambition and support as time flew by. The iconic dreams and knowledge was not to last for dear Cicero, Mark Antony despised
him as Cicero's proud outspokenness finally caught up to him. December 7th, 43 BC, Cicero was sentenced to suicide by his own hand, his body
parts of his head and hands were later displayed by Antony. By this time Tully had already divorced two wives and had two children; Marcus Tullius
Cicero Minor, and

Of Julius Caesar And Kamehameha As A Effective Leader
Effective Leader Essay Kamehameha the Great was a remarkable leader who fought for his people and for his cause: to unite the Hawaiian Islands.
The process was long, but the outcome was worth it. The two remaining rulers of the Kingdoms of Hawai'i came to a consensus and Hawai'i had peace
for the first time in three decades. During his rule, Kamehameha–with help from foreign advisors–made Hawai'i wealthier and safer. On a different note,
Julius Caesar's skill in politics and warfare helped him earn the title of consul. Caesar used his resources and power to expand Rome's empire, his
fortune to distribute land to the unfortunate, and his authority to legislate laws for his people (PBS.com). In the end, despite being from different
centuries and countries, Kamehameha the Great and Julius Caesar were both effective leaders because they reliable, benevolent,and did what could
benefit their people.
Both Julius Caesar and Kamehameha aided their countries to become wealthier and helped in times of need. As king, Kamehameha took part in a trade
between foreigners. While trading, Hawaii earned most of its earnings from trading (mainly because of the thirst for sandalwood). However, the
sandalwood population began to plummet and, as a result, Kamehameha placed a kapu on sandalwood younglings (26). In Rome, many were
unemployed or poor, so Caesar went to fix this problem. Some of the unemployed were offered jobs overseas while those who stayed behind relied on
a monthly grain supply.

Pompey the Great
While it is clear that Pompey the Great was a successful general, how he came to be so is a more complicated matter. To analyse Pompey's career this
essay will first examine his background, highlighting the advantages and difficulties that arose from being from a fairly new noble family. Additionally
key events in Pompey's career will be explored chronologically, focusing on his most important military successes as well as his political career. This
will attempt to determine how much his success relied on his personal characteristics or because of his he was able achieve his successes due to his
personal attributes or because of his political relations with noblemen such as Sulla, Caesar and Cicero.
While Pompey's family was extremely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pompey captured Carbo but hesitated before finally deciding to kill the man who had three times been censor (Plut.Pom.12). Furthermore his ruthless
treatment of Ahenobarnus would give him the nickname В‘adulescentulus carnifex', meaning В‘teenage butcher'. Sulla gave Pompey a chance at
military success, which he took full advantage of, gaining a good reputation from the start of his career.
Sulla reinforced this reputation for Pompey, giving him the cognomen В‘magnus' meaning В‘the Great'. By this time the young Pompey was
wildly popular in Rome and asked for a triumph in 81BC. Sulla told Pompey he did not qualify, as he had not even held office in Rome. Pompey is
famed for telling Sulla that more people worshipped the rising than the setting sun, to which Sulla was surprised at his boldness. Sulla eventually
allowed him a triumph. Pompey's career was able to advance prematurely and this triumph allowed him to increase his image as a young conqueror,
much like Alexander the Great. Finally Sulla was able to help Pompey be enabling him to become very wealthy. During Sulla's dictatorship, both
Pompey and Crassus were able to buy large amounts of land as it had been confiscated off those on Sulla's proscription.
As Sulla retired and took himself out of public life, Pompey's most important political relationship was that which he had with Caesar. In 67BC Rome
had problems with pirates who were affecting the

Gnaeus Pompey and the fall of the Roman Republic Essay
Events which stretch as far back as the reforms of the Gracchi brothers' meant that the Rome was facing a Republic that was already deteriorating
before Pompey had stepped into power. While Pompey's quest for power was harmful, many other factors were also baleful to the Republic, and
were hence instrumental in its decline. Gnaeus Pompeius's measures to gain power were harmful because it was primarily a paradox to the principles
of being part of a Republic with all its notions of shared and short power. The fundamental reason why there were other reasons for the decline of the
system are that the military power was given to him, the already weak Senate, and the fact that Pompey was not the only player in the breakdown of the
Republic due ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Aside from this, it also hints at the Senate's role in the harm due to its own weakness and lack of handle on the situation by allowing for Pompey to
undergo the triumph.
Though Pompey sought power by manipulating the political system to his own advantage, the fact that the Senate was already weak and hence gave
him this power.This shows that although Pompey's actions were detrimental to the fall of the Republic, he was not the sole contributor. Pompey was
both underage and had held none of the required offices, yet the Senate passed decrees exempting him from these traditional prerequisites, thus
allowing for him to be joint consul with Crassus in 70 BC. According to Cicero, "absolute power" was what he had sought, and thus this ambition had
nothing to do with "the happiness and honour of the community." This reveals a callously ruthless dimension to Pompey, in that he would undertake
any measure to achieve his own goals. However, it should also be noted that Cicero's interest areas are sometimes narrow and deliberately, or
accidentally selective. By reaching the top without any previously held positions of consequence, Pompey the Great had manipulated the political
system to his own advantage. Thus, by doing so he undermined the Senate, reiterating its insignificance and weakness.
While Pompey's political alliances were harmful to the Republican system, he evidently wasn't the only player in

Relationship Between Caesar and Octavian Led to Rome's First Emperor

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Relationship Between Caesar and Octavian Led to Rome's First Emperor