PESTEL Analysis of Starbucks Expansion to Colombia

Essay On Pestle Analysis For Starbucks
2.0 PESTEL Analysis
PESTEL stands for political economics, social, technological, environmental and legal factors. It is a tool used by companies to track the environment
they are operating.
2.1 Political Factors
Starbucks new plan for Colombia has influenced some political factors. Starbucks has announced a plan to open its first coffee shop in Colombia. It has
been buying more than forty years of coffee beans from Colombia, it will finally start to sell its Colombian brews to professionals in Bogota.
According to a report from the Inter–American dialogue, starting in Bogota, Starbucks is planning to open at least 50 coffee shops across the country
over the next five years. The U.S. Department of State, April 2013 Travel Warning for Colombia reported that there are many U.S. citizens safety visit
Colombia every year for tourism, business, studies, and volunteer work. Security in Colombia has improved tremendously in recent years, including in
tourist ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Starbucks is looking at new overseas market and coffee shops around the world. However, many people find this expansion affecting their private
life or interrupting them in an unwanted and annoying way and are scared of the Americanization of their culture. To prove these negative feelings
towards their brand and in order for foreign customers to find more appealing, Starbucks needs to tell a story. The most attractive one being the story
of the coffee bean, grown on an exotic island. Starbucks is taking on local aspects, like specific flavours and cultural habits, for example green tea
Frappuccino in Asia, in order to distance themselves more from their American roots. In order to get rid of the negative image that American chains
put local stores out of business, Starbucks is recruiting locals (Eline Van Lombeek, 2010,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Stimulus Reform
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, otherwise known as the Stimulus Bill, was one of the first major pieces of legislation passed
by the new Democratic Congress in 2009 and signed by newly inaugurated President Barack Obama. The legislation was an attempt to take the United
States economy out of a major recession through federal spending. The motivation for this bill was the collapse of the housing market bubble and the
mortgage crisis. A result of these problems was the decline of consumer and corporate credit, causing monetary liquidity in the economy. Obama argued
that the economy needed a "jump–start" to get moving again; that being the stimulus of 2009. Drafts for the bill called for as little as $275 billion in
spending,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For Science and Technology: $10 billion for new scientific facilities (increase) and $6 billion to improve internet access in rural areas (Increase).
For the Infrastructure: it included $30 billion for highways (Increase), $31 billion to modernize federal buildings and infrastructure(Stimulate) ,
$19 billion for clean water (Stimulate), and other environmental investments, and $10 billion to improve public transit and rail
infrastructure(Stimulate) . For Education: $41 billion for local school districts(Increase) , $79 billion to maintain schools (Stimulate) , $15.6
billion to broaden the federal Pell Grant program (need based grants to fund education)(Increase), and $6 billion to modernize higher education
programs(Stimulate). For Health Care: $87 billion for Medicaid (Increase), $20 billion to improve technology in the medical field (Increase), and $4
billion to improve preventative care (increase). The plan also includes $140 billion directed towards tax cuts of $500 per worker or $1,000 per family
over two years, expand tax credits for working poor with children, and a $2,500 college tuition credit. All of this is a part of the G in the C+I+G+Xn,
GDP Formula. Gsavings= Taxes–Gov't Spending–Xn (Exports – Imports). The Treasury's $700 Billion in TARP funds, which were originally aimed at
stabilizing the financial sector, should be used to provide relief to other industries and "for things that look more like stimulus and less like asset
purchases." Some of the things that this includes is: Automatic economic stabilizers like the extension of unemployment insurance, the expansion of
health insurance, Mortgage relief for those American's facing default, the federal reserve's purchase of mortgage–backed securities and other types of
securities in need in the future, and an

The Clean Energy And Security Act Of 2009
With total vote of 219 to 212, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES), also known as Waxman
–Markley Cap and Trade bill (
Waxman–Markey), was passed on June 26, 2009 by the U.S. House of Representatives. The ACES Act contains five main categories. The first one is
clean energy. The second is energy efficiency. The third is reducingglobal warming pollution. The fourth is transitioning to a clean energy economy,
and the last is agriculture and forestry related offsets. In fact, Waxman–Markey is a comprehensive national climate and energy legislation that would
establish an economy–wide, greenhouse gases (GHGs) cap–and–trade system and critical complementary measures to help address climate change and
build a clean energy economy. Through Waxman–Markey, GHGs emission allowance of organizations will be allocated and auctioned.
Waxman–Markey proposes the clean air act to reduce the effects of global warming by setting economy cap and trade program that control GHG
gases emission using 2005 baseline. Every year, there are more than 25,000 tons per year of GHGs that emitted by large stationary sources emitting
producers like refineries, and importers of all petroleum fuels, natural gas distributors, commercial and small industrial users ("American Clean Energy
and Security Act of 2009: Update on the Waxman–Markey Climate Change and Clean Energy Legislation", (2009)). Some example of GHGs that emit
from refineries and distributors are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane

My Permanent Home, Texas, And I Am Represented At All...
. With a population of roughly 26 million, Texas has a unique blend of languages, cultures, and political ideologies. With such a huge population and
varying interests, there are many representatives to help voice the majority concerns and interests within the state. These representatives hold office in
varying levels of government such as local, state, and national government positions. My permanent home is in Keller, Texas, and I am represented at
all three levels of government. My local government consists of six city council members who all represent the city of Keller. The council consists of
members: Debbie Bryan, Gary Reaves, Tom Cawthra, Bill Dodge, Bill Hodnett, and Rick Barnes. Further up in the chain of government is
Representative Giovanni Capriglione. Representative Capriglione represents me in the state government level in the 98th district. Finally, in the
national level of government, republican Congressman Michael C. Burgess represents me. Congressmen Burgess represents congressional district 26.
Michael Burgess addresses several needs of the citizens of the 26th district and has taken certain stances on a variety of issues and topics. Three issues
Congressman Burgess considers priorities are energy, federal spending, and health care. Burgess has made headlines regarding the stances he has taken
on these issues. Burgess believes that his stances best represent the 26th district of Texas and serve the citizens best. Along with his role of congressman,

Health Care System: Canada And The US Republican Party
The idea of what the Canadian Health Care system should be varies between the country's three political parties. According to the official website of
the New Democratic Party of Canada, the NDP believes that every Canadian citizen should have quality, reliable health care. In fact, the NDP initially
created Canada's public health care system. In addition to the current health care system, the NDP is trying to create legislation that would grant free
dental and drug coverage for seniors over the age of 65. Lastly, recent debate in both Canada and the United States has been on the subject of whether
or not health care should be privatized. It is the belief of the NDP that the privatization of health care would have a negative effect in ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the United States of America, there exists a two–party system comprised of the U.S. Democratic Party and the U.S. Republican Party. Although these
two parties have become somewhat neutral on many issues of national policy, each party has a unique perspective of how the ever–looming Social
Security problem should be alleviated. First, the U.S. Democratic Party believes that in order to fix the Social Security problem, pension plans must be
reformed and savings incentives must be expanded nationwide. Also, the U.S. Democratic Party has persistently argued against the recent idea of
privatizing Social Security. On the other hand, the U.S. Republican Party believes the Social Security system is in need of much more drastic change.
According to statistics provided by the official website of the Republican National Committee, "Under the current system, today's 30–year–old worker
will face a 26% benefit cut when he or she reaches normal retirement age." Also according to the RNC website, "By 2041, when workers in their
mid–20s begin to retire, the system will be bankrupt – unless we act now to save it." In order to fix this troubled system, the U.S. Republican Party
believes that the only answer is privatization. Another pressing issue in American politics is the issue of energy. Although both sides agree that our
dependence on foreign is unhealthy, each side promotes a different approach to change it.

Why A National Carbon Cap And Trade Program Is Missing?
Kun Lou Why a National Carbon Cap–and–Trade Program is Missing? Cap–and–trade is a system designed to reduce emissions. Once a cap of certain
emissions is set, companies are allowed to sell their unused portion to ones who exceed the cap. The feature of cap–and–trade is that instead of
commanding companies how to reduce their emissions, it simply imposes a cap on emissions1. A company makes it own decision on how to use it
allowance. Companies are rewarded by selling the left quota under the cap or they have to purchase extra allowance from the market. Though the term
'cap–and–trade ' is mostly referred to efforts in reducing carbon emission, the initial idea of trading emissions was applied to SO2 emission control.
During Regan administration from 1980 to 1988, 70 bills were written to address SO2 emission and acid rain control. However, such
'command–and–control ' policy was too costly to operate. It was not until 1989 the government proposed emission trading as a means of reducing SO2
emissions2. Cap–and–trade officially became part of Clean Air Act 19903. The result from this very first cap–and–trade initiative was very
encouraging–3 million tons of acid rain emissions have been cut. With the recognition of climate change, cap–and–trade was proposed to be a solution
to dealing with carbon emission. The America 's

The United States
It is undisputable that the U.S has opened the doors to many countries, establishing multinational corporations and emerging new markets to explore
international waters to help other nations flourish and gain a competitive advantage. For many years Africa has been floating in the U.S radar. The U.S
has looked for ways to cultivate the land, understand the culture; people and strengthens its relationship with the African government. In recent years
the continent has grown significantly with the opportunity of U.S market access and the creation of new export trade avenues to Africa. In May 2000,
The African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a unilateral, trade agreement betweenSub–Saharan Africa and the United States, launched new
efforts to grow the African market. The enactment was deliberately created for eligible countries to participate in trade opportunities and to export their
products to the U.S markets with duty free privileges. The opportunity has developed a substantial amount of trade and investment between
Sub–Saharan countries and the U.S. Subsequently, the Doing Business in Africa (DBIA); campaign took effect on November 2012. The campaign's
major goal was to connect American businesses with African partners, to support existing and new U.S investments in Africa. Additionally, to inform
and provide access to American companies to finance their exports and reduce barriers to trade and investment in Africa. In August 2014, the U.S and
African leaders Summit

The Federal Government Should Work On Promoting Either...
Summary of Contentious Issues
The federal government should work on promoting either nuclear or solar energy. Energy is important for survival on a daily basis. In fact, the
development of any nation depends on the long–term availability and increase of clean and safe energy that also supports the environment. Currently,
no energy source can be said to be sufficiently capable of meeting future needs that a nation requires. It is important therefore to promote any particular
type of renewable energy. Promoting and enhancing solar energy would be a better move to take. It is better for the environment if the federal
government work on improving solar energy usage. Installation of solar panels by Americans continues to increase with each passing day. Despite
this positive progress, this avenue of power is not fully exploited because of lack of infrastructure to store solar energy. Solar energy was ranked as the
third electricity–producing source after natural gas and wind energy thus accounting for fourteen percent of the total electricity produced. This
significant contribution of the solar energy shows that when properly exploited, solar energy can be a major source of electricity for the country.
However, there is need for the issues surrounding its maximum exploitation to be addressed. The government should subsidize infrastructure. The most
important infrastructure that the federal government should look into includes connection to the power grid, conversion of the solar

American Recovery And Reinvestment Act ( Arra ) Essay
III. Case of Other Countries
(1)The U.S.
The U.S. submitted its INDC to achieve an economy–wide target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26%–28% below its 2005 level by 2025.
With this plan, the U.S. has several laws related to its environmental policies. Among them, these are main four Acts (Korea Institute of Energy
Research [KIER], 2016a): The Energy Policy Act established in 1992 was to secure energy security and revised in 2005 to decrease the reliance on
oil and coal energy; The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) legislated in 2007 due to the necessity for energy independence caused by the
unstable Middle East and high oil prices, so President Bush announced the 'Twenty in Ten Initiative ' that aimed to reduce 20% of the gasoline
consumption by 2017; The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was enacted in 2009 as one of the reflationary measures, and this
included $8.5 billion investment for energy–related policies; The Clean Air Act (CAA), made in 1970, regulated the atmospheric pollution sources and
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used CAA to restrict thegreenhouse gas.
In 2013, the Obama Administration issued the Climate Action Plan to focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 % reduction below 2005
levels by 2020. This plan's three objectives were carbon reduction, strengthening capacity for climate change response, and leading international
cooperation for climate change crisis (White House, 2013). To reduce the

Let's Rock the Informed Vote: Barack Hussein Obama
The incumbent 44th President of the United States is my preferential candidate of choice for the upcoming November, 2012 Presidential election.
Dissecting his views and actions on a variety of topical policy issues will illustrate that my support for my candidate is on target. Furthermore, data
will show success of Obama's policies. Leading economists, including New York University's Mark Gertler called the economic climate Obama
inherited "one of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression." (Hilsenrath). There is no doubt that the economy and a candidate's economic
policy will be the hottest item of discussion in politics during election season, along with topics like foreign policy and energy. Consequently Obama's
economic... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some presidential candidates are taking a radical stance on Iran and intimating that we should take military action now in response to Iran's nuclear
policies. Obama chastised these candidates reminding them, "They're not commander in chief. When I see the casualness with which some of these
folks talk about war, I am reminded of the costs involved in war" – for those who go into combat, for national security and for the economy. 'This is not
a game,' he added. 'And there is nothing casual about it' "(Calmes). It is good that our commander in chief is a thoughtful man and takes war and
foreign policy seriously. Pursuant to energy efficiency policies, controversy swirls as climate changes are experienced in the U.S. and around the
globe. When energy efficiency steps are put into place, economic outlooks turn positive. Obama's policymaking in this arena makes "critical
investments in advanced vehicle and fuel technologies, public transit, and high speed rail" (United Press International). With new fuel efficiency
standards that will improve fuel economy by 2025, and other initiatives that he enacted, "12 billion barrels of oil will be saved and American
consumers will save $1.7 trillion at the pump, and greenhouse gas emission standards for commercial trucks, vans, and buses for are projected to
save over 500 million barrels of oil and save vehicle owners and operators an estimated $50 billion in fuel costs" (United Press

Alternative Energy Essay
A topic that has been in discussion throughout the years was the use of alternative energy. Alternative Energy is being increasingly used due to "The
threat of global warming." (Tom Udall, "Clean Energy," par. 3). The result of the burning of fossil fuels and fossil fuels are soon depleting and
alternative energies will be the ways that people will be living in the near future. As the positives of alternative energy will provide a healthier and
cleaner future, cost is something people underestimate. The price of alternative energy will increase our national deficit as well as the people's taxes,
as manufacturing these products that will create alternative energy is expensive. As the economy of the United States continues to fall apart,... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the American Petroleum Institute, and American Gas Association were against extreme spending and are worried about the unstable
economy, and would rather have the usage of fossil fuels and keep people in business than spend billions of dollars towards alternative energy that
will save money in the future, and therefore are against the bill. I believe that API will have the most influence on S. 3813, as each member of the
organization has a specific job to try and persuade Senate to reject the bill. "The American Wind Energy Association was created in 2007" (Archive,
About AWEA, par. 1) "AWEA promotes wind energy as a clean source of electricity for consumers around the world." (Par. 2). They were created
after global warming was starting to become a national problem. "AWEA is a national trade association representingwind power project developers,
equipment suppliers, services providers, parts manufacturers, utilities, researchers, and others involved in the wind industry. In addition, AWEA
represents hundreds of wind energy advocates from around the world." (Par. 4). "AWEA supports policies to boost wind energy and slow climate
change." (Par. 5). They are working day and night to make sure that S. 3813 is passed. Their goal is to "increase Wind Energy to 15% by 2021."
(AWEA, phone interview) With the Ambition that AWEA shows, it will make every attempt to pass S. 3813 its priority. "AWEA has over 1200

Springfield Missouri 's Drury University 's Ozarks Center...
Springfield Missouri's Drury University's Ozarks Center for Sustainable Solutions reports accessible financing for clean diesel ventures for open and
private diesel armadas. "Eligible equipment includes on–road and off–road heavy or medium duty diesel vehicles or equipment that are stationed or
operated in the following counties: Cedar, Polk, Dallas, Barton, Dade, Greene, Webster, Christian, Jasper, Newton, McDonald, Lawrence, Barry, Stone,
or Taney (Brothers). Covanta (NYSE: CVA), a world pioneer in sustainablewaste administration and renewable energy, today declared another
organization with nine Western Massachusetts regions for packaged sustainable waste management services. Covanta will give feasible waste transfer
at the Covanta Springfield Energy from–Waste office, additional to other waster services (Convanta).
Covanta is the proprietor/administrator of the Covanta Springfield Energy from–Waste office in Agawam where eight of the nine regions have given
their city strong waste on account of the office was created in 1988. The first eight regions, Belchertown, East Longmeadow, Granville, Greenfield,
Longmeadow, Ludlow, Southwick and Wilbraham cultivated with one other neighborhood, Shutesbury and cooperated with Covanta to achieve
another understanding (Convanta).
The nine regions will send roughly 25,000 tons of city strong waste to the Covanta Springfield Energy from–Waste office which furnishes area
neighborhoods with an atmosphere preferable option to

Pros And Cons Of Renewable Portfolio Standards
Lujia Wang
Major: Statistics
Dec 7, 2014
Topic: Renewable Energy Policy Renewable Energy Policy: Renewable Portfolio Standard
Audience: General people who don't know anything about Renewable Portfolio Standard.
Summary: In this paper, I will introduce the Renewable Portfolio Standard and tell the audience what the Renewable Portfolio Standard is. And then I
will list many different Renewable Portfolio Standard in many different countries and in different states in the U.S. Then I will analysis the advantages
and disadvantages of this renewable energy policy. Finally I will make my own recommendations and suggestions.
Executive Summary: The Renewable portfolio Standard is requires ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, in California, in 2002 the California Renewable Portfolio Standard was adopted. In their goals, the portion of renewable electricity
must be increasing 1 percent every year and in 2010 it must reach 20 percent. But in 2008, they change the number 20 into 33(Senate Bill No.107
Chapter 464). In Michigan state, in 2008 October 6, the Public Act 295 which is also the Clean, renewable and Efficient energy Act was adopted.
They set that by 2015, that proportion of renewable energy must achieve 10 percent (michigan.gov). In Colorado, they increase their original plan
from 20% to 30% in the 2010 legislative session as House Bill 1001. The reason they hope to increase the number is because that the government
hopes to create more revenue from the state government (Ritter 2010). In Florida, in 2009, the Florida Public Service Commission decided to
generate 20 percent of electricity from renewable energy by 2020. In Ohio, in 2008, the Ohio legislature passed a bill that 25 percent of electricity is
generated by alternative or renewable energy and at lest 12.5 percent of electricity will be generated by renewable energy (Writer

The United Nations Environment Assembly
Delegation fromRepresented by The United States of America The Hudson River Group Position Paper for the United Nations Environment Assembly
The topics before the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) are: Combating Illegal Trade in Wildlife; Implementation of the Paris
Agreement; and Sustainable Use of the Oceans, Seas, and Marine Resources. The United States of America advocates for responsible stewardship of
the environment and will prioritize the protection of clean air and water at the upcoming conference. I. Combating Illegal Trade in Wildlife Studies
suggest that fewer than 30,000 rhinoceros now reside in Africa and Asia. This population decline is primarily due to poaching, which affects not... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Based on the success of its National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking, the United States advocates for three resolutions. First, UNEA
should work with the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (CCPCJ) to train rangers, law enforcement, judicial officials, and airline
employees in the prevention of poaching and trafficking, a strategy that has significantly increased arrests across Africa. Second, UNEA should work
with the CCPCJ to strengthen wildlife laws in African and Asian Member States. For example, in Kenya and Mozambique, implementing higher prison
sentences and fines has deterred wildlife trafficking. Third, UNEA should encourage all Member States to fund public awareness campaigns against the
illegal trade in wildlife. Since 2011, awareness campaigns on televisions and computers have reached 740 million people in Asia. Moreover, Fin Free
Thailand, in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development, has persuaded over 180 restaurants to halt the sale of shark
fin. II. Implementation of the Paris Agreement According to the World Health Organization, between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to
cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress. The increase in global temperature, rising
sea levels, and the destruction of ecosystems have threatened

Why Coal Is Responsible For Destroying The World
As far back as the Roman Empire, and indeed probably long before then, coal has been used by humans as a source of heat, providing many advantages
over wood, charcoal and other fuels. However, it wasn 't until the introduction of the steam engine that coal became a major part of shaping the world.
Fueling the industrial revolution, the high energy concentration of coal made it the standard source of everything from trains to power plants. Coal
companies claim that coal, though not perfect, is the best source of energy at this moment, and the negative effects are being mitigated even as we
speak. Consumers have a high demand of energy, that cannot be sated by other sources. To this very day, coal continues to drive forward the world, but
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They are focused on finding ways to make coal cleaner for the environment, and have outreach programs to get youth involved in this process as
well. Their main claims are that they "recognize inextricable linkage between energy, the economy and the environment" and "support policies that
promote the use of coal". They resolve these two seemingly conflicting goals by "supporting investments..including capture and storage of CO2
emissions". Coal, they argue, provides the energy security that the United States relies upon. The United States have more coal reserves than the
Middle East has oil reserves, and could power the United States for the next 290 years at the current rate of consumption. Even though Coal is
becoming less relied upon, they expect coal to remain dominant through at least 2040. The reason for this is low energy costs. States with large coal
reserves pay, on average, $0.88 per kilowatt hour (kWh), while states that lack reserves pay $0.1244 per kWh. And outside of the states, consumption
is on the rise. There was a 39% increase in demand by 2012, and they are expecting an 80% increase by 2035. But with all this coal, there is going to
be more emissions. The ACCCE is attempting to develop new technologies to implement, having spent one hundred thirty billion dollars so far and
planning on investing

Cost Of Climate Change Essay
1. Helping Avoid the Runaway Costs of Climate Change Action to sharply reduce our global warming emissions can greatly curtail the costs of
climate change, especially over the longer term. For example, climate action can help numerous businesses that are vulnerable to a changing climate,
from maple sugaring in the Northeast and skiing in Colorado to vital energy and transportation companies that depend on offshore oil rigs in the Gulf
of Mexico and shipping on the Great Lakes.
One study has estimated that, if emissions remain unchecked, losses related to just four areas–hurricane damages, energy costs, water costs, and
residential costs stemming from sea–level rise–could equal 1.4 percent of GDP by 2025, and 1.9 percent of GDP by 2100. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Similarly, India is planning to boost solar power from near zero to 20 giga watts by 2020, part of an ambitious $19 billion, 30–year plan to increase the
share of renewables in that country's energy mix.
The United States must continue to expand its burgeoning clean energy industries–wind, solar, biomass, geothermal power, and efficient vehicles,
among others–to keep pace with other countries. Strong policies to promote investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean transportation,
as part of a comprehensive climate plan, will create the momentum to keep these industries internationally competitive.
4. Improving Public Health reducing our emissions through a shift to cleaner forms of energy will not only help slow global warming but will also
improve air quality, reducing the cases of asthma and other respiratory illnesses that result from high levels of ozone and airborne particulates. Such
cuts in emissions will also reduce the amount of mercury and other heavy metals–by–products of coal–fired power plants–that enter our air, water, and
food.
5. Saving Households and Businesses Money
Independent analyses of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), the energy and climate bill now being considered by Congress–such as
by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Energy Information Administration (EIA)
–show that the act's costs
to the U.S. economy would be

##ving Our Environment, Gun Control, And Rights For The...
After reviewing sources about Republican, Democratic, and Independent views on issues that are most important to me, I found that my views are most
consistent with the Democratic Party. The issues that most strongly influenced my conclusion are preserving our environment, gun control, and rights
for the LGBT community. I feel strongly about combating climate change and building a clean energy economy. Additionally, I regard gun control to
be an important matter because there have been too many tragedies caused by lenient gun laws. Finally, I believe in human rights for the LGBT
community because they deserve the same rights as all Americans regardless of who they love and who they identify with. Through research of the
sources provided... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Paris agreement is effective because it ensures that countries are making a solid effort to prevent temperatures from rising. As one of the most
powerful countries in the world, it should be our duty to take the lead in making our Earth a better place. 68% of Democrats strongly believe that the
government should regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources like power plants, cars, and factories in an effort to reduce global warming,
compared to only 28% of Republicans (Washington Post 2017). The data show that Democrats have made reducing global warming a stronger priority
than Republicans have. "The best science tells us that without ambitious, immediate action across our economy to cut carbon pollution and other
greenhouse gases, all of these impacts will be far worse in the future (Democrats.org 2017)". The majority of Democrats look to scientific facts that
show that we have no time to waste for stopping climate change. Republicans believe that "information concerning a climate change, especially
projections in the long–range future must be based on dispassionate analysis of hard data" (Republican Platform 2017). They don't have the same
urgency to take action to prevent climate change that is necessary.
Pollution is another major problem that Democrats are addressing, as they believe that everyone should have access to clean air and water.
"Low–income communities and communities of color are disproportionately home to environmental justice "hot

Department Of Defense In The Military
Department of Defense: gives the military qualities anticipated that would upset war, and to guarantee the security of the United States. The
Department of Defense is America's most prepared and greatest government office. With our military after its roots back to pre–Revolutionary times,
the Department of Defense has created and progressed with our nation.
Department of Homeland Security: is a prompt outgrowth of the terrorist strikes on September 11, 2001, which highlighted America's weakness to
terrorism. In spite of the way that the workplace is blamed for guaranteeing the "nation" and is in this way unmistakable from the military, which
secures abroad, the Department of Homeland Security later devoured the US Coast Guard, which heretofore

Climate Change : Global Warming
Climate Change Background Information
What is Climate Change? Climate Change discusses the alteration in climate patterns over a period of time, from several years to millions of years.
Climate change can happen in any direction and can be caused by many different factors such as variation in the earth's orbit, volcanic eruption and so
on. However, recently, due to unregulated human activities, many scientific researches showed that the temperature of Earth has constantly increased
during the past half century. Therefore, climate change is now often referred to as "global warming", which talks about the uncommon increasing in
global climate temperature caused by human activities and the negative consequences it would bring to our environmental and ecological stability.
Consequences of Climate Change and Why we need to combat it Several natural abnormities have given human beings clues that climate change is
affecting us and all other living organisms. Carbon Dioxide (CO2, the most common greenhouse gases) has reached its highest level all over history.
(Below is a photo from NOAA, national oceanic and atmospheric administration, a federal agency focused on the condition of the oceans and
atmosphere. 2014) Based on NOAA's measurement, the global carbon dioxide parts per million is 401ppm in October, 2015. (NOAA, 2015)
What's more, continuing global warming has brought us long period and severe drought in certain region, more intense tropical storms. Greenland and

A Study on Acela
Renewable energy policy will have varying effects on different industries across agriculture, some more or less and to different degrees within
industries. In order to identify these influences, the actual policy must be identified and then the industries involved must be defined. The current
relevant policy directive under the U. S. Department of Agriculture, itself an agency under the Executive Branch i.e. White House, is the 2009
Americal Clean Energy Leadership Act, or ACELA. A stream of other proposals flows into Congress ongoing which would presumably have similar
economic effects on agriculture. Different sectors within agriculture are defined under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
class 11, which provides a convenient and authoritative framework for comparing industries (U.S. Census, 2002). Changes to national renewable
energy policy will have different effects in different industries, but also different effects within industry classes based on geographic location and
firm size, so this analysis will consider effects between groups and also within specific NAICS classes. While this discussion considers logging and
husbandry as included under NAICS 11, the results would be the same in theory were the scope limited to farming only. ACELA is a wide
–ranging
'omnibus' act that affects finance, land and plant acquisition, and incentives for research and development in local generation and more efficient
manufacturing, consumption, and

The Effects Of Global Warming On Our Economy
Global warming is "The increase in Earth's average surface temperature due to rising levels of greenhouse gases" (NASA). This issue is not a myth
anymore, is affecting our economy, health and our future aggressively. The need to reduce pollutant emissions is now something urgent and an
important commitment for all the nations. Natural disasters, virus and diseases are consequences of changes of temperature, the emissions of carbon
gases weaken the ozone layer, water and food pollution.
According to the World Health Organization, environmental pollution produces more than seven million of deaths every year. Theglobal warming has
been causing damage in this country, the last year (2014) has been considered the hottest year in United ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Other argument for withdraw, was that the implementation of the treaty was inefficient and unfair involving just the developed countries and
excluding from restrictions some of the biggest emitters of gases like China and India, because they are considered developing countries. Before the
Federal Government began to focus in this problem, the private sector was trying to create programs for the reduction of pollution, but without the
political and financial support of the government, all these efforts were insufficient.
There are some federal laws to protect our environment and health. The Clean Water Act which prohibits sending pollutants into waters by requiring
specific sites that discharge materials. The Clean Air Act has been improving the air quality since 1960. Some of the most recent energy legislation
include the Energy Policy Act (2005), the Energy Independence and Security Act (2007), and the Energy Improvement and Extension Act (2008). With
the Energy Policy Act, the tax incentives have been reduce the costs of develop and adoption of new technologies (Matzner).
Today, as a new political commitment to save the planet, the presidentBarack Obama has created The Clean Power Plan, its principal objective is a
thirty percent reduction of carbon pollution from the power sector by 2030. Coal plants are the largest generators of gases and the principal

United States Dependence On Foreign Energy Resources
United States Dependence on Foreign Energy Resources
Introduction
Everything you do requires energy. Even now to type this report also I require energy. So to do work energy we require energy. How this energy
obtained? Water, Food, Shelter, and Clothing are few basic necessities of life. And to supply it to all the people of the country, we need transport
.Obviously everything can't be produced wherever you are. You need to buy it from wherever it is present or produced. Now transportation can be
simply done you need some energy resources to do it .Where do we get this resources?
There are 2 basic ways likely:
1.Produce your own resource.
2.Get it from somewhere who has it. We for the past decadesUnited States has been the largest importer of energy resources throughout the world. We
consume almost 7 billion barrels of fuel in various forms such as crude oil, petroleum, gasoline, biodiesel etc. And how much do we produce on own?
Only 30%–40% of own consumption is produced by the United States and the rest is imported.
In 2004 according to a report America's imported as much as Japan, Germany, China and India combined.
пѓјDependency can be measured by evaluating the impacts it holds on four main constituents of the state:
1)Economy
2)Military
3)Foreign affairs
4)People
But in case of oil or resources it revolves around all these spheres. Because of the dependence America has a huge disadvantage and has the potential to
inflict great

Political Power Of Energy Efficiency
Political Power in Energy Efficiency Energy, which has a bearing on both economic and national security, boasts its vital importance in that it gives
rise to the economic and social development of the whole world. Although the world teems with diverse energy, most of the energy that has been put
into application in our daily life or industrialized world is nonrenewable, with particular reference to the fossil fuels, which means once it has been run
out, it can never be reproduced. Moreover, conditions are getting worse as the increasing energy consumption caused by the high pace of the
development of industry and agriculture and the abuse of some energy, it seems that all nations to some extent have been stuck in the plight of energy...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Political power can make a difference in arousing awareness of energy efficiency of the individuals. Even though common people are less exposed to
the storage and distribution of energy, after all, they are a large group of consumption. For example, according to the U.S. Energy Information
Administration, in 2012, the annual average electricity consumption for one U.S. household is 10,837 kWh. The residential electricity consumption
was more than 37 percent of the country's total consumption, compared to 26 percent for the industrial usage ("Summary Statistics for the United
States, 2002 – 2012"). However, if the political power enacts some policies or releases some norms and standards in energy efficiency, for sure most
of the individuals would be more concerned with their energy consumption and cater to the policies or norms and standards to make a difference in
energy efficiency for the sake of their own interests or national call. A individual's awakening awareness might be limited but the awakening awareness
of a majority of individuals is beyond our imagination. According to Ari Peskoe, "One individual's actions, like voting, protesting, or donating a small
amount to

FEMA Failure
When a disaster such as a hurricane takes place, the first responsibility is of the state's governor to make a formal request for a state of disaster and
receive the necessary assistance and aid to the affected area (The Disaster Hanbook– National Edition, 1998). The President of the United States of
America must make a declaration of emergency and major disaster to initiate the effort to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (The
Disaster Hanbook– National Edition, 1998). Once a disaster has been declared, the U.S president will send supplementary funds to the state and local
efforts to aid the affected population (The Disaster Hanbook– National Edition, 1998). In order for funding to be dispersed to the area in need, the
President of the United States must allow this action to take place.
The Federal Response Plan implements the Stafford Act (Public Law 93–288, as amended) which verifies what qualifies to be considered a true
disaster (The Disaster Hanbook– National Edition, 1998). The Stafford Act also coordinates twelve federal agencies to fulfill twelve emergency support
functions: Transportation– Department of Transportation, Communication– ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instantly following hurricane Katrina, FEMA was hesitant and did not accept help from non–government organizations, "The American Red Cross was
not allowed into New Orleans following the disaster and was unable to supplement the government's response' (American Red Cross 2005)." According
to the Government Accountability Office, during the hurricane Katrina catastrophe, the failure to designate a single official to lead the overall federal
response made matters worse (Fessler, 2006). The Government Accountability Office also noted that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
never named the storm as a catastrophic event which would have activated a much greater federal response (Fessler,

Federal / National Efforts : Under Congress
Federal/National Efforts Under Congress. Environmental initiatives did not have a fortunate path under congress. In the past 15 years, most of the
innovative policies did not pass either the committee or the senate. For example, in October 2003 and again in June 2005, the McCain–Lieberman
Climate Stewardship Act failed to operate. The McCain–Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act was a combination of three different acts that require
corporations to be part of cap–and–trade system for greenhouse gases. It was initiated by United States Senate John McCain and Joseph Lieberman
first in 2003. However, all three acts did not pass the senate. (National Wildlife Federation) In order to examine and combatglobal warming, Senator
Bernie Sanders and Barbara Boxer introduced the Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007 on Jan 15th, 2007. The act was proposed to
increase performance abilities for electricity generation and motor vehicles with the choice in emissions "cap and trade" system. Unfortunately, the
bill failed to pass committee in 2013. (Environmental Defense Fund, 2007) American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, an act initiated by
Henry Waxman on May 15th, 2009, was proposed to create more clean energy working positions, assuage global warming and transfer to clean
energy economy. The bill passed the house of representative in Jun. 2009. However, it also died at Senate as a result. (The New York Times, 2009)
Though there are several attempts to enact

Essay on Global Warming
Transitioning to clean energy sources will involve a policy that involves an extensive amount of research in the fields of science, economics, and
politics. It is crucial that the United States conceives energy resources that decrease both environmental and health impacts. However, environment and
health impacts are not the only aspects that must be considered as the United States moves to cleaner energy resources. The competitiveness of the
United States' economy as a whole and job security must be taken in account. ("Facing Our Energy Realities" 4) Therefore, the transition must be
controlled. The transition should not detrimental to the citizens of the United States. Previously, politicians with the intentions of launching a safer...
It may not be feasible for the government to award incentives to every home or small business that is energy efficient. However, if citizens are more
familiar with how much their utility bills will decrease, naturally, they will be inclined to inquire more "green" practices. While it is evident that
Americans must learn to be more efficient, it is apparent that energy use cannot be stopped and certain people may never decrease their overuse of
energy. ("Facing Our Energy Realities" 2) Therefore, the United States must change its Energy Policy to meet the demands of today and of the future.
Several people theorize that global warming is a component of the natural cycle of the Earth's climate, and it is not a consequence of energy sources. As
the United States is currently a world leader in climate science, research of the climate should persist. The U.S. contributes profoundly to the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). ("Invest in Climate Science...") The main reason the U.S., along with numerous other countries,
is shifting their energy policy is due to the impacts that the current sources are found to have on the environment. The U.S. needs to invest in advance
measuring technologies that collect an array of measurements in various land, water, and air means. Understanding the climate change, whether it is
due to human actions or a natural reaction, is vital for politicians to make erudite decisions

Environmental Policies Of The United States
Over the years the United States ' environmental policies have expanded as well as the awareness of the public and the opinions of many party
members, interest groups, and those directly effected by the environment 's decline. There are many institutions that have an effect on environmental
policy like congress, many federal agencies, the office of management and budget and the executive branch, nongovernmental forces, individual
citizens, and the main one, the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Cohen, Steven). America 's general belief is more contrary to
objective reality. Many Americans fear sever water andair pollution over the next 50 years. This is because of industrialization, population growth, and
mass consumption. The public have recently started pushing environmental problems to the top of the political agenda. Support for the environmental
policies in the United States comes from the way individuals assess the environment, and their perception of the governmental regulation of the
environment and their relative evaluation of the line between environmental protection and economic forces (Carman, Christopher). Interest groups
have been the catalyst of getting environmental information out to the public. They have researched and studied and are made up of individuals with
drives to help the world. They passionately push for change in the way America views the environment. America needs to be leaders of the world
especially when it comes to saving it

Global Climate Change And The Global Environment
The environmental security is one of the biggest concerns for human society in these days as stability and natural resources preservation have become
essential elements of international relations and domestic security. By looking to the current situation of global environmental security, it seems that
the rate of destruction to the world's environment by humans is increasing and the damage is faster than it can be recovered (Fiona Harvey, 2016).
There are many factors which play a fundamental role in destroying the global environment. The most visible one is the human's incorrect activity that
resulted in climate change which can be viewed as an enormous threat to environmental security. It is believed that the current local and global climatic
changes have been impacted by the increase of greenhouse gases emissions which may effect on reducing the food and water as they are the main
elements for environmental and human security. This paper gives an outline of the theory and practice of global climate change and a brief history of
the international negotiations on the issue done by United Nations and argues how successful they have been. Then it reviews the impact of climate
change on Australia's environment and explains its national polices and international commitments, as well as the role of both USA and China, the
largest contributors in emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions. At the end it explains the way in which

The Proposal : Keystone Xl Pipeline Approval Act
In this paper I will write in opposition to the: S.1–Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act. If enacted, this bill would allow the TransCanada corporation to
build and manage an oil pipeline across North America. Authorization of the bill will require amendments to energy conservation policy, as well as,
established building codes. Essentially, these changes liberate a building owner's ability to manage energy manage energy consumption, and requires
the Department of Energy to actively monitor this consumption. In terms of cost, Government funds will be moved from current energy programs then
put towards pipeline instillation. This aid will not be a direct stipend, rather states and local organizations will be incentivized by the government to...
On the contrary, I argue that economic growth is important, but the destructive environmental effects this bill will bring about outweigh their benefit.
The extraction of the oil sands will cause immediate damage to the ecosystem, and the Transportation of these sands could pollute the drinking water
of over 2.3 million Americans (Denneky). For the remainder of this paper I will elaborate on my arguments against the bill, and address the
arguments in favor of the bill. Arguments against The damage caused by extraction of these oil sands is not a theoretical problem. Over the past
sixteen years more than two million acres of the Canadian boreal forest has been cleared to extract these sands (Nikiforuk). Not only does the
extraction process cut down trees it also produces more greenhouse gasses than the extraction of crude oil, and leaves polluted residue across the
extraction sight. These contaminants then spread to surrounding bodies of water. Once these contaminants have reached these water supplies they have
an immediate effect on wildlife. Fish have been found with cancerous growths in rivers near extraction sites (Forrest). From this we should infer that
not only has this oil mining had a negative on wildlife, but it could also pose health risks to local residents near the extraction sites. Though there is
little Americans can do to prevent Canada's current extraction. By not installing the

Comparison And Contrast The Party Platforms Essay
Compare and contrast the party platforms
Baramee Janla
The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast an opinion of Democrats and Republican party over the environmental issues.
Democrats want American workers and businesses to compete for jobs and invests in global clean energy and high–tech products. They want American
manufacturer to become a competitor that uses the greenest and most efficient energy around the world. Also, they support the public and private
investments in science, technology, and research. They believe that we must take advantage of science, technology, and research to create
higher–paying jobs across the country. Democrats will connect every household in America to high–speed broadband, increase internet adoption, ...
I agree with Democrats that we must seize the opportunity that the technology provided us. New technologies have the potential to generate trillions in
economic output. Which we could spend to do more research or support NASA to the new mission. Republican is not wrong either, we have relied on
agriculture since who know when. As a result, we do not depend on other countries to imports for sustenance. On a second topic, I do not agree with
Democrats that they want to connect every household in America to high–speed internet. This is because the free internet will result in bankruptcy for
many companies such as Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Straight Talk, etc. Which would also force a lot of people to lose their jobs? Moreover, the
unemployment rate will increase because people will become lazy due to unlimited internet access. In the end, I agree with democrats that we should
act now, while we can, against climate change. We should not wait for the congress to start to listen to science because of the phrase "Better safe than
sorry" is sacred. On the other hand, I also agree with the republican that we should not panic about a non–existent threat. As a result, I could not choose
a side to commit

Alternative Energy Solutions For Renewable Energy
With the ever increasing demand of fossil fuels, society has been faced with the problem of a quickly diminishing supply. We are scrambling for
solutions in underdeveloped technology and overlooked industry. There is much debate on whether any alternative energy solutions are able to
effectively replace fossil fuels. Even if they are, we are then faced with the problem of how renewable energy programs could be implemented and
improved. There are many aspects of this debate to consider, including energy demand, financial support, and ecological factors. The push for
alternative energies is essential and the need is eminent, therefore government subsidization should be made a greater priority in our nation. Over
millions of years the fossilized remains of plants and animals have decayed and been stored in the form of petroleum, natural gas, or coal
underground for our later extraction. This stored energy can then be burned to use as fuel (DOE 2008). Because these fuels take millions of years to
form, the available supply is limited for our ever–progressing industrial society. Our usage is causing a lot of concern among the energy conscious all
over the world due to the fact that many developed nations could not function without fossil fuels. The main solution to this problem goes by the name
of "alternative", "renewable", or "clean" energy. This energy comes from sources apart from fossil fuels, this includes wind, solar, and geothermal
among others (Utah 2013). These

Essay On Homeland Security
Organizational specifics and Roles and responsibilities related to overall homeland security efforts. As one of the largest energy suppliers in North
America and the current leader in transmission development, the American Electric Power Corporation is a major private sector corporation. Our
primary mission is to produce clean energy with respect and efficiency for the customer and the environment while securing our critical assets and
fulfilling the role of a secure and resilient energy sector representative. The AEP holds homelandsecurity in high regards while accounting for the
generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity to customers across the nation. The annual earnings for the AEP were in access of $1.6 Billion
and our assets account for $59.6 Billion. The specific critical infrastructure (CI) consists of approximately 40,000 circuit miles, 220,000 miles of
overhead distribution lines, 5,700 railcars, 60 harbor boats, 5 major subset power companies, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Our responsibility, while maintaining public–private relations is; to maintain secure communication; foster efficient information sharing with local,
state, and federal agencies; increase our efforts towards a resilient corporation; establish protective programs that comply with the DHS's Critical
Infrastructure Program (CIP); and increase nationwide community policing awareness (Energy SSP 2010, 43).
The changes in rating of our debt and profits are disclosed in an annual summary along with future impact projections on funding requirements and the
possible impacts of unforeseen events such as wars, terrorism, embargoes, cyber security threats and other natural disasters. The AEP abides by the
"Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (AEP Fact Book 2014,

The Endangered Species Act By Pete Mccloskey
I was inspired to get involved in politics in the 1970s by my local Congressman, Pete McCloskey, a leading environmental advocate, co–founder of the
first Earth Day, and one of the original authors of the Endangered Species Act. As a lifelong hiker and nature lover, two of my early heroes were John
Muir, the founder of the Sierra Club, and Rachel Carson, a leading conservationist of her time. Today, I enjoy hiking through Catoctin Mountain Park,
biking along the C and O Canal, and I am committed to preserving the wildlife and natural resources of the 8th District and Maryland. Among my top
priorities as your Representative in Congress will be protecting nature and addressing climate disruption by supporting a transition to a clean energy...
I will also support regulatory measures and incentives to conserve energy in buildings, homes, cars and other transportation, as well as funding for mass
transit.
Fracking / Fossil Fuels
The shale revolution has provided a new source of natural gas and energy independence for the United States, but it must be carefully regulated to
keep our nation's water supply safe and clean. That's why I am a firm supporter of the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act. In Congress, I
will diligently work to end the "Halliburton Loophole," which has dangerously exempted fracking from necessary federal environmental regulation, and
I will advance efforts to create stronger regulations by the EPA to ensure that hydraulic fracturing is practiced in a safe and environmentally conscious
manner.
I also oppose the Keystone Pipeline and support ending costly fossil fuel subsidies, which totaled over $18.5 billion in the United States in 2013.2
This is a waste of taxpayer money, as the top five oil companies earned $93 billion in profit in the same year.3 In Congress, I will fight to end
Republican expansion of oil subsidies and instead focus on incentivizing the production of clean energy that will eliminate our dependence on coal and
oil companies.
Conservation
I was raised in a family that practiced "reduce, reuse, recycle," and brought that

Current Policy And Politics : The International Image Of...
Current Policy and Politics The international image of America as it relates to energy is that of a country of non–conformance. We continue to be the
largest energy user in the world and a negative externality of that energy usage is the impact of climate change worldwide. The international
community believed that our nation created roadblocks in the way of reaching a global agreement on climate change and environmental protection.
President Obama and Secretary Kerry worked hard to change this stigma given (1) the widely accepted scientific research concluding human activity
is jeopardizing the planets future and (2) the majority of our citizens are passionate in their beliefs that the issue of climate change is real. President
Obama and Senator Kerry's ability to diplomatically negotiate the Paris Agreement was a huge step for our country in this domestic and international
issue. Taking an alternative stance, via the energy policies you support, on climate change has the potential to expose your Administration to severe
public backlash, both domestic and international, from the onset of your presidency. Therefore, I urge you make energy a top priority within your
first 100 days in office. Please consider your stance carefully in order to create a unified, bi–partisan America on this issue. My recommendations and
reasoning are included herewith. Research has proven American's overwhelmingly want cheap, clean, and reliable energy for their homes and
businesses. They

Dirty But: Coal Is Necessary
It May be Dirty But: Coal is Necessary
Where does the electricity the U.S. uses come from and is it clean and safe for the environment? In the U.S. and worldwide around 40 percent of the
electric generated is through the burning of coal. The World Coal Institute assesses that "coal is a fossil fuel. It is a combustible, sedimentary, organic
rock, which is composed of mainly carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen" (World Coal Institute). Coal is found worldwide with the largest reserves found in
the U.S. While the use of coal for generating electricity causes pollution and health concerns, coal is readily available and can provide employment and
national security for years to come.
The coal reserves across the country are broken down into four types by the U.S. Energy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of these are released into the atmosphere as hazardous air pollutants...and many of them are harmful to health" (Lockwood 17). The EPA has
done many studies to determine the elements that are released from the burning of coal and the amount of each is measured. While the amounts may
be minute, over time with exposure they can damage to human organs. For this reason many activists desire to eliminate or slow down the use of
coal for generating electricity. While it is true that the elements and compounds are harmful to humans, the amount of some of these elements is not
truly harmful. The benefits of having cheap energy far out way the negatives from the pollution. The average life expectancy is on the rise around
the planet and cheap energy has improved the lives of many in poor countries. The U.S. government and the EPA have created many laws to protect
citizens and to force coal burning facilities to reduce emissions. Renewable sources for energy are good, but the sun does not always shine, nor the
wind blow, and at those times, coal is

The Issue Of Climate Change Essay
The issue of climate change is one of the most decisive matters, in determining the ecological state of the world in the foreseeable future. The fact is
that the globe has been steadily increasing at an alarming rate since the industrial revolution. It is estimated that over the next eighty years, the
ecosystem in which we live, will look nearly unrecognizable in a matter of decades. As the magnitude of the problem increases, we will continue to
deal with devastating weather events, that will occur as a result. Events, such as extreme weather, increase in temperature, ocean acidification,
depletion of our polar cap, and a number of other environmental repercussions are likely to occur, if we do not act with reasonable care and timeliness.
As policymakers and politicians, it has always been a question of whether or not this concern is something that should be dealt with within the span of
our lifetimes. For a number of years, it has always been a question of whether or not a concern such as this should be prioritized. Under the Petersen
Administration, environmental security will be regarded as more important than economic security. The U.S. will continue to honor its pledge from the
Paris agreement, which states that the U.S.' pledge is to cut emissions by twenty–six percent below 2005 levels by 2025, and to make its "best efforts"
to reach twenty–eight percent in the coming years. Many global nations will partner with the U.S to assert that unilaterally and multilaterally,

President Obama 's Clean Power Plan
President Obama's Clean Power Plan
In August 2015 President Obama and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) finalized their plan to cut carbon pollution and drive climate
change, called the Clean Power Plan. President Obama first announced his rededication to Climate change in a speech at Georgetown University, in
June of 2013, saying: "I refuse to condemn your generation and future generations to a planet that is beyond fixing" (whitehouse.gov). Indeed, since,
Obama has once again stepped back into the belief that fixing our planet is not only what is right, but also it is what is necessary for the people of
tomorrow to live in a world that is not damaging to their health.
Even though he recently reaffirmed his stance on the issue, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As he started his campaign for President in 2008, Obama stated his passion for the cause in a strong statement via video for a climate conference in
Los Angeles, as transcribed by the New York Times: "My presidency will mark a new chapter in America's leadership on climate change that will
strengthen our security and create millions of new jobs in the process" (Broder). Much like his statements in the previously failed bills out of the
Senate, Obama planned to reduce Carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050. He intended to start his administration on strong footing by attaining
something he has reached for for so long – clean energy and a reduction in carbon emissions – and now, hopefully as President, he would have the
power to follow through on this agenda.
However, his plans for decreasing Carbon emissions came to a standstill with the death of his cap–and–trade bill – the American Clean Energy and
Security Act– that was killed in the Senate. This cap–and–trade mechanism – "a market based incentive to reduce carbon emissions," planned to cut
down on greenhouse gases and global warming by mandating a " combine renewable electricity and energy efficiency standard requiring that 20 % of
electricity sales by 2020 be met by renewable energy and energy efficiency" (aceee.org). Obama still believes it is the best course of action to use such
incentives to slowly turn our nation into a society that is fully environmentally friendly. Using incentives would ensure

The Pros And Cons Of Renewable Energy
Although the United States has come a long way in the field of Renewable Energy, there are still major roadblocks in the way of a national shift to
clean energy. Renewable energy made up only 12% of US energy production in 2016, while The three major fossil fuels–petroleum, natural gas, and
coal–accounted for 78%, showing there is still a long way to go (eia.gov). This has been a particularly arduous year for environmentalist and renewable
energy companies alike as there have been major political strides against clean energy. Bills, Executive Orders, and new laws have slowed the progress
that Renewable Energy has been making in recent years.
The President
There is no denying the Trump Administration's loyalty to the coal and oil industries. While there has been some mention of incorporating more clean
energy into the US, there have been direct threats to the Renewable Energy revolution by the Trump Administration. In a recent Executive order by
President Trump, he focused on reform of regulations related to energy production. "Section 1. Policy. (a) It is in the... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"The legislation ... will put Alaska and the entire nation on a path toward greater prosperity by creating jobs, keeping energy affordable for families and
businesses, generating new wealth, and strengthening our security – while reducing the federal deficit not just by $1 billion over ten years, but tens or
even hundreds of billions of dollars over the decades to come," she said (D'Angelo and Visser). Rather than needing the usual 60 votes to avoid a
filibuster, this legislation only requires a 51–vote majority to pass in the Senate. This change in vote requirements is because it is part of Congress'
2018 budget plan. While Democrats have made many attempts to bar such a bill from moving forward, almost every Senate Republican voted them

PESTEL Analysis of Starbucks Expansion to Colombia

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Rebecca Evans

More from Rebecca Evans (10)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

PESTEL Analysis of Starbucks Expansion to Colombia