rehabilitation processes evaluation types

1. REHABILITATION
AND EVALUATION
OF HEALTH
QURATULAIN MUGHAL
BATCH IV
DOCTOR OF PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISRA UNIVERSITY

2. REHABILITATION
Defined as “combined and coordinated
use of medical , social , educational and
vocational measures for training and
retraining the individual to the highest
possible level of functional ability”
Areas of concern in rehabilitation :
Medical rehabilitation
Vocational rehabilitation
Social rehabilitation
Psychological rehabilitation

3. REHABILITATION
PROCESS

4. MEDICAL REHABILITATION
Is a follow up treatment after any
kind of treatment program

5. REHABILITATION
BENEFITS
 Repetitive and task-specific exercises:
•Sensory-motor function
•The functional of upper-limb
•Eye-hand coordination
•Cognitive skills and perception
•Sitting balance and postural control
•Gait ability
•Activities of daily living
•Problem solving / decision making
•Social aspect and co-operation, mental health
•Motivation and active involvement to rehabilitation process
•Increase the participation to society
 quality of life

6. Needs for Rehabilitation
Impairment
 Disability
Handicap
Functional limitation

7. EVALUATION
“the process in which planners
determine the value or worth of the
objective of interest by comparing
it against a standard of
acceptability”

8. STANDARD OF
ACCEPTABILITY
A comparative mandate, value,
norm or group.

9. Types of Evaluation
Formative evaluation
Summative evaluation

10. Formative evaluation
INCLUDES SEVERAL EVALUATION TYPES:
 needs assessment determines who needs the program,
how great the need is, and what might work to meet the
need
 evaluability assessment determines whether an
evaluation is feasible and how stakeholders can help
shape its usefulness
 structured conceptualization helps stakeholders define
the program or technology, the target population, and the
possible outcomes
 implementation evaluation monitors the fidelity of the
program or technology delivery
 process evaluation investigates the process of delivering
the program or technology, including alternative delivery
procedures

11. Summative evaluation
CAN ALSO BE SUBDIVIDED:
 outcome evaluations investigate whether the program or
technology caused demonstrable effects on specifically
defined target outcomes
 impact evaluation is broader and assesses the overall or
net effects -- intended or unintended -- of the program or
technology as a whole
 cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis address
questions of efficiency by standardizing outcomes in
terms of their dollar costs and values
 secondary analysis reexamines existing data to address
new questions or use methods not previously employed
 meta-analysis integrates the outcome estimates from
multiple studies to arrive at an overall or summary
judgment on an evaluation question

12. PLANNING THE EVALUATION
It’s the min-step, which determined
who will evaluate the program.
*INTERNAL EVALUATOR:
“one who already is involved in the
program”
*EXTERNALEVALUATOR:
“one from outside the program”