The articles were gathered into their subject matter category, as resolute by the WHO. The types comprised of: 1. Epidemiology 2. Event Operations 3. Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response 4. Point of Entry Health…… Continue Reading : https://bit.ly/3I9NmIz Our Services : https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/clinical-literature-review-for-an-evidence-based-medicine/ Why Pubrica: When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.   Contact us:      Web: https://pubrica.com/  Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/  Email: sales@pubrica.com  WhatsApp : +91 9884350006  United Kingdom: +44-1618186353

1. Levels of evidence-based
medicine in mass
gathering public health
and emergency medicine
literature review
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica
Group: www.pubrica.com
Email: sales@pubrica.com

2. In brief
Mass gathering science is a very new
and emerging area, and it is now
necessary to summarise the rigour
of knowledge collected regarding
the intricate interrelationships
between significant event aspects,
spectator profiles, and health
concerns.

3. This study aims to describe the
levels of evidence found in peer-
reviewed academic papers about
mass collecting public health and
emergency medicine.
The data supporting the science of
public health and evidence-based
medicine practice has not been
rigorously examined until now.

4. Introduction
Several principal literature evaluations
on various elements of mass collecting
evidence-based medicine in research
have been conducted in the past.
They released a paper at the time that
examined the level of scientific
knowledge and urged scholars to
address critical concerns in the
provision of good healthcare during a
large-scale meeting.

6. In effect, throughout five years, the took stock of development in this
specific area of mass gatherings.
Mass gathering science is a very new and emerging area.
Therefore, it is necessary to summarise the depth of knowledge collected
regarding the intricate interrelationships between key event features,
patient profiles, and public health consequences.
This study aims to conduct an online review of peer-reviewed scientific
literature published between 2001 and 2011 about mass collecting public
health and emergency medicine.

7. The publications in this study are organized into specified World Health
Organization (WHO) categories, and the degrees of evidence-based
practice quantitative research is measured using the effectiveness
classifications devised.
The WHO categories are section titles that have been provisionally
defined to reconstruct the WHO Guidelines for Mass Gathering Health.
This helps comprehend the evolution of mass collecting literature since it
offers information on the degree of evidence in publications.

8. Methods
The following online databases were
searched: GALE, NLM, Web of Science,
Elsevier, Wiley, BMJ Journals, OUP,
IngentaConnect, RMIT, DOAJ, and
JSTOR. Grey literature and published
news stories were removed.
The levels of evidence were examined
using the effectiveness classifications
generated after the peer-reviewed
publications were organized into pre-
determined World Health Organization
categories.

9. Epidemiology
Event Operations
Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response
Point of Entry Health
Psychosocial Considerations
Public Information and Health Promotion
Emergency Medical Services
Environmental Deliberations
The articles were gathered into their subject matter category, as resolute by
the WHO. The types comprised of:

10. In addition, each publication was categorized using the JBI stages of
evidence about the effectiveness as follows:
Meta-analysis of experimental trials (with homogeneity) (e.g., RCT with
hidden randomization) OR A significant number of experimental trials with
small confidence intervals

11. one or smaller RCTs with broader confidence intervals Studies using a
quasi-experimental design (without randomization)
Consensus, expert opinion, or physiological bench research
a)Cohort studies (including a control group), b) Case-controlled studies, and
c) Observational studies (without control group)

12. Discussion
Although high-level evidence
studies may not be practicable in
the setting of a mass gathering,
investigations at the intermediate
level should be promoted, so
event management techniques
are less reliant on experience and
expert opinion.

13. To construct a substantial body of knowledge, it is still necessary to
carefully focus and further improve research in certain areas of mass
collecting science.
This prevalence of lower evidence-based practice literature review levels in
the literature does not indicate that these research are uninformative or
unusable in practice.

14. The creation of theoretical models supported by more significant levels of
evidence and capable of underlying preventative and response strategies
that are successful and suited for implementation across diverse event
types in varying situations and geographies may remain the focus of mass
gathering research.
Identifying the most significant levels of evidence in each mass collecting
health area will be critical to creating theory. A counterpart to this demand
is the need for increased research effort, particularly in disciplines where
the volume and quality of research are woefully lacking.

15. CONCLUSION
The development of theoretical
models supported by more significant
levels of evidence is required to
underlie the creation of effective
preventative and response models that
can be used in various types and
situations of mass gatherings. Some
areas of mass information collection
are still underdeveloped and require
much work.

16. About Pubrica
Pubrica has worked as a medical writer in the past. Clinical Research,
Pharmacology, Public Health, Regulatory Writing, Clinical Report Forms
(Crf), Biostatistics, Psychology, Life Science, Dentistry, Radiology,
Dermatology, Diabetology, Gynecology, Cardiology, Biochemistry,
Forensics, Surgery, Neurology, Psychiatry, Genomics, Medical Device,
Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Fmcg Companies, Hospitals, Universities,
Publish Unique Medical Writing Services

17. +44 1618186353
UNITED KINGDOM
+91-9884350006
INDIA
EMAIL
sales@pubrica.com
CONTACT US