Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

2.10 Permanent Supportive Housing for Families (Harte)

1,772 views

Published on

This workshop will examine permanent supportive housing models that are serving families with the greatest barriers to housing stability, including families that experienced chronic homelessness.

Published in: Education
  • Great job, also I've been using a service called MLMRC which automates your downline building. Works with any MLM business. Try it: www.mlmrc.com
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

2.10 Permanent Supportive Housing for Families (Harte)

  1. 1. Keeping Families Together: Using Permanent Supportive Housing to Preserve and Strengthen High-Risk Families
  2. 2. Corporation for Supportive Housing <ul><li>CSH is a national non-profit organization that helps communities create permanent housing with services to prevent and end homelessness. </li></ul><ul><li>Since 1991, CSH has been advancing its mission by providing advocacy , expertise , leadership , and financial resources to make it easier to create and operate supportive housing. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Keeping Families Together (KFT) Overview <ul><li>Three-year pilot funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to determine whether of not permanent supportive housing can increase housing stability and reduce/prevent incidences of child neglect and abuse among chronically homeless families. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Why Target Child Welfare-involved Families? <ul><li>Research shows high prevalence of child welfare involvement among homeless families. </li></ul><ul><li>Family homelessness on the rise </li></ul><ul><li>NYC tragedy brings to light “systems failure” too big to ignore. </li></ul><ul><li>New supportive housing investment and production in NYC. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Primary Program Elements <ul><li>Thirty units of Permanent Supportive Housing targeted to high need families at-risk of separation to foster care. </li></ul><ul><li>Full-scale evaluation measures both systems and family-level outcomes (housing stability, child welfare involvement and general family functioning). </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative implementation effort brought together both government and nonprofit housing providers (6 housing providers and 5 government agencies). </li></ul><ul><li>Clinical training and consultation provided through a contract with Mt. Sinai School of Medicine to build capacity of housing providers to serve highest need families. </li></ul>
  6. 6. ACS Field Office, ACS Contracted Preventive Agencies Court Unit Family Court Children’s Attorneys Parents’ Attorneys KFT Housing providers interview eligible applicants ACS/DHS Child Advantage Match DHS Shelters CSH/Keeping Families Together ACS FAMILIES: Open & Indicated Case DHS FAMILIES 1 of 2 years homeless or “at-risk” Families are placed in housing; program evaluator collects baseline data Identifying Families Typically Out of Reach HRA Determines Eligibility DHS
  7. 7. KFT Family Characteristics <ul><li>Based on interviews with 30 adults (29 families): </li></ul><ul><li>Typical KFT family is headed by a single mother of color in her mid-30s. </li></ul><ul><li>Majority of heads of households had not completed high school (69%) and only a very small percentage had been employed in the 3 years prior to the start of the pilot. </li></ul><ul><li>Substantial histories of past trauma including: parental drug or alcohol abuse; parental death or abandonment; sexual, physical, or verbal abuse; neglect; foster care, homelessness and chronic housing instability. </li></ul><ul><li>96% have a history of substance abuse. 54% had been diagnosed with mental illness. </li></ul><ul><li>50% of the minor children moved into the housing with their family; about a third were in foster care or an informal placement at that time. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Childhood Experiences of KFT Heads of Household
  9. 9. Service Utilization
  10. 10. KFT Outcomes: Residential Stability <ul><li>Nearly all (90%) KFT families remain housed, some for as long as 30 months. </li></ul><ul><li>The shelter histories of 15 DHS comparison families show a cumulative average shelter duration of 15.3 months, ranging from 2-30 months. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Seven families (46.7%) exited shelter after this initial stay. Eight families (53.3%) either remained in shelter without interruption or had episodes of one or two additional shelter stays during the period under study.   </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. KFT Outcomes: Children’s Safety and Well-Being <ul><li>62% of child welfare cases open at the time of housing placement were closed. </li></ul><ul><li>Four children who were in foster case reunified with their families over the course of the pilot. </li></ul><ul><li>The school-age children housed during the 2007-08 school year showed steady average increases in school attendance over three years, from before move-in to one year after move-in. </li></ul>
  12. 12. Keeping Families Together Partners
  13. 13. KFT Government Partners <ul><li>Government agencies involved: </li></ul><ul><li>NYC Department of Homeless Services </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Helped to identify and recruit eligible families; prioritized ACS –involvement among all those eligible for supportive housing; built awareness of project among family shelter providers and families. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NYC Housing Preservation and Development </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Coordinated development timeline with recruitment efforts. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NYC Administration for Children’s Services </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Helped to identify and recruit families; confirmed eligibility status; helped providers overcome bureaucratic obstacles related to their child welfare involvement (education, communication). </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Contract with KFT providers; provide technical assistance regarding NY/NY III implementation. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NYC Human Resources Administration </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clarified eligibility application process and eligibility criteria. </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. KFT Non-Profit Provider Partners Provider Name Units Model Location CAMBA 2 Integrated Brooklyn LESC 10 Single-Site Bronx St. John’s LLP 2 Single-Site Bronx The Lantern Group 6 Single-Site Bronx Palladia, Inc. 4 Single-Site Bronx Women-in-Need 5 Scattered-Site Brooklyn
  15. 15. Alison Harte Project Director, Keeping Families Together [email_address] Donna Tapper [email_address] Rebecca Swann-Jackson [email_address]

×