SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
Property of United Stationers Inc 1
Surviving Katrina
Marshall Lancaster
April 2nd
, 2008
March 30, 2015
Property of United
2
Agenda
Introduction
Katrina Overview and Impact
Case Study: Lagasse Katrina Recovery
» Business overview and history
» Key terms
» Business imperatives during Hurricane Katrina
» Lagasse DR design and results
General recommendations
» “Best practices” for DR
» Cost-effective DR
» Lessons learned and recommendations
Review / Questions and Answers
March 30, 2015
Property of United
3
Introduction
In August, 2005, Lagasse Inc. was headquartered in New
Orleans, LA. Hurricane Katrina and the subsequent events
made the entire area inaccessible, including the primary
computing facility and customer care center.
As a result of the storm, Lagasse experienced no system
down-time, and recorded it’s second and third largest sales
days in the week following.
In addition, the ability to quickly redeploy personnel allowed a
major acquisition and integration effort to continue on schedule.
March 30, 2015
Property of United
4
Hurricane Katrina Overview
Made second U.S. landfall as a Category 3/4 Hurricane
» Initially impacted Florida as a Category 1
» Massive storm, briefly a Category 5
• New Orleans received sustained Cat 1 /
Cat 2 winds for several hours
» Levees breached in 73 locations
• Major failures: 17th
Street Canal,
Industrial Canal, London Avenue Canal
• 80% of New Orleans flooded
» Over 1,400 lives lost in the aftermath
• 1,100 in New Orleans
Massive relocation resulted
» Over 6,000 evacuees in Chicago (the largest non-Southern migration)
March 30, 2015
Property of United
5
Regional Impact Assessment
Immediate loss of all critical
infrastructure services
» Power, water, food, fuel
» Medical and police severely strained
First 14 days:
» Most basic infrastructure still off-line
» Access to city highly restricted by
local and federal authorities
15 days to present:
» Slow, arduous recovery process with on-going structural problems
» Huge deficit of professional talent due to massive relocations
» Persistently degraded socials services (medical, educational, etc.)
March 30, 2015
Property of United
6
Lagasse Business Overview
Wholesale distribution company focused on Janitorial
-Sanitation, Foodservice, and Paper products
»Over 1,000 associates nationwide
»2007 Gross Sales approx. $750M
»31 Warehouse facilities
Immediately prior to Katrina, acquired Sweet Paper
Sales Corporation, with 10 facilities and $250M in
annual sales
Lagasse is a wholly owned subsidiary of United
Stationers, a $4.5B broad-line wholesale distribution
company (NASDAQ:USTR)
March 30, 2015
Property of United
7
Hurricane Katrina
Primary Lagasse data center
located in New Orleans, LA.
Impacted business functions:
»Largest Customer Call Center
»New Orleans Distribution Facility
»Operations Procurement
»Marketing Pricing Product
Management
»Accounting Finance Executive
»Information Technology
Most Information Technology staff were based out of New
Orleans
Over 200 associates were displaced, the majority in
professional and support activities. 90% of administrative
capacity was disrupted
March 30, 2015
Property of United
8
Associates (Before the Storm)
= ~25 associates
Associates (One Week After the Storm)
= Data Center
= Warehouse hub
= Warehouse
March 30, 2015
Property of United
9
Lagasse / Katrina Timeline
March 30, 2015
Property of United
10
Major Timeline
E-commerce Implementation
SP Facility Integration - Raleigh
Disaster Recovery Effort
Disaster Asset Recovery Team
(DART)
Business Recovery Effort (BCP)
New Orleans Headquarters Closed
IT Team Move (Chicago)
SP Facility Integration - Boston
SP Facility Integration – San
Francisco
SOX Compliance Audit
SP Facility Integration - Atlanta
SP Facility Integration - Tampa
Aug DecSept Oct Nov Jan ‘06
March 30, 2015
Property of United
11
Key Terms
Recovery Point Objective (RPO): maximum amount of
data loss that is deemed acceptable by data owners /
business
Recovery Time Objective (RTO): maximum period during
which data can be unavailable for access or modification
Seven Tiers of Disaster Recovery (SHARE 1992):
»Tier 0: No recovery capabilities
»Tier 1: Tape backup, no off-site hardware
»Tier 2: Tape backup, with off-site hardware
»Tier 3: Electronic vaulting – across the wire protection of some data
»Tier 4: Point-in-time-copies
»Tier 5: Transaction integrity
»Tier 6: Zero or near-zero data loss
»Tier 7: Highly automated integrated solutions
NotadoptedbyLagasse
March 30, 2015
Property of United
12
Lagasse DR Plan
Multiple ‘dry-runs’ had improved capabilities
» (2002) Hurricanes Isadore, Lilli
» (2004) Hurricane Ivan
» (2005) Hurricane Dennis
Established three application tiers for planning recovery
» Tier 1: Required for pick, pack, ship, and manual order entry
• Semi-automated recovery
• 0-15 minutes of data loss, 6 hour recovery
» Tier 2: Platforms critical for consistent customer experience
• Limited staff required to recover
• 0-24 hours of data loss, 24-72 hours to recover
» Tier 3: Computing resources that support reporting, administration
• Specialized staff required to recover, no commitment to recover
Planning is the act of trading chaos
for error ~ Author unknown
March 30, 2015
Property of United
13
Lagasse Computing Environment
March 30, 2015
Property of United
14
Lagasse Computing Environment
(cont.)
Geographically diverse (Chicago backup DC)
Leveraged parent-company infrastructure
Simplified architecture: avoided application and
infrastructure complexity whenever possible
Utilized technology refresh cycles to redeploy old
production equipment into DR
‘Blended’ recovery approach: range of SHARE DR tiers 1
through 6, depending on application importance and
complexity
Supportive processes and technologies in place
»Database Transaction Logging (i.e. Oracle Archive Re-do)
»DNS / DHCP
March 30, 2015
Property of United
15
ERP Recovery
Database log files are generated to /db/dbrecover
Log files are FTP’d to remote
server directory
»Only new files are migrated
»Utilizes sequence numbering
UNIX cron job runs hourly to
‘roll forward’ the database
transactions on backup server
» Limitation: DR database cannot be used for
testing
Additional process automates replication for key UNIX files
and directories (i.e. /etc/passwd, printer defs, etc.)
ProductionProduction
ServerServer
/db/dbrecover/db/dbrecover
Backup / TestBackup / Test
ServerServer
/db/dbrecover/db/dbrecover
DB file01
DB file02
DB filexx…
March 30, 2015
Property of United
16
Network Recovery
All IP address-based connectivity
was removed and replaced with
DNS naming system
Recovery configurations for
routers were stored on
remote host servers
»Changes to ‘IP Helper’
statements cause redirection of
DHCP and DNS requests
»NAT statements utilized to redirect
any systems that do not support DNS
(TFTP, remote terminal services, etc.)
High bandwidth link used for file synchronization becomes
primary connectivity mode for remote warehouses and call
centers
March 30, 2015
Property of United
17
Systems Recovery - Various
E-storefront
» Tape restore to like hardware
for initial build
» Code changes manually passed
across WAN
» Configuration changes required:
• Messaging
• E-storefront DB
• Catalog DB
• Application integration layer
EDI
» External DNS re-targeted to
Chicago host address
Application Integration Suite
» Tape restore to like hardware
for initial build
» Incremental changes and
patches passed across WAN
Document Imaging System
» Replaced older document
imaging system, deployed to
Chicago in known working state
» All production config changes
made to backup system
Small Parcel Shipping
» Automatically handled as part of
DNS re-pointing
March 30, 2015
Property of United
18
Systems Recovery - Failed
Legacy E-commerce / E-storefront
» Restore from backup tape was only partially successful
» Heavy modification of original source code prevented ‘clean install’
» Old environment recovered as part of ‘DART’ (Disaster Asset Recovery
Team), which was an effort that recovered viable technology assets from
the New Orleans data center
» Resolved by moving customers to new product
Hyperion Data Warehouse
» Tape recovery proved unsuccessful,
and staff with the knowledge to rebuild
were not available for almost 3 weeks
» Recovered as part of DART
Activity Based Costing System
» Tape unsuccessful, recovered during
DART
March 30, 2015
Property of United
19
Business Continuity
Headquarters relocated to
United Stationers corporate
offices in Chicago
‘Southeast Headquarters’ set
up in Atlanta in order to support
displaced professional workers
Temporary ‘remote’ call centers
established in Dallas, Atlanta,
San Antonio, and Miami
Due to the on-going integration of Sweet Paper, project
teams had to be re-assembled quickly
»First 2-3 weeks spent rebuilding contact information
»IT support re-assembled in Chicago, Oaks, Atlanta
»Many associates become ‘virtualized’ – operate from hotels, new
houses, Internet cafes
March 30, 2015
Property of United
20
Lessons Learned
Do not locate your primary data systems in New Orleans!
(other cities may not be great choices, either…)
Tape recovery is extremely complex, and not very reliable
Communication quickly breaks down during disaster
»Cell phones are nearly useless if homed in disaster area
»Associate web-site (alternate DNS) and alternate associate hot-line
were invaluable fall-backs
Laptops, Citrix, and VPN are powerful BCP tools
People are more important than plan…
»It all starts with hiring / development
»Can they be where you need them when the time comes?
March 30, 2015
Property of United
21
Lessons Learned (cont.)
A robust DRP is only part of the answer; a solid BCP
completes the puzzle
‘Force Majeure’ clauses exist in most off-site storage
vendor contracts and agreements
March 30, 2015
Property of United
22
Best Practices DR Architecture
Rely on best-in-class co-location partner
» Provides security, power, cooling, and fire suppression management
» Geographically diverse, preferably +200 miles between DCs
Select premier storage supplier
» Block-level replication for Tier 1, file-level for Tier 2
» Tape recovery reserved for Tier 3
Create network architecture with telecommunications
provider redundancy and ‘last-mile’ diversity
Automated fail-over, clustering
Build highly specialized technical competencies
» Required to support complex recovery environment
March 30, 2015
Property of United
23
Supporting Technologies
Application Stacking: Hosting multiple applications
within the same compute environment. Applications share
hardware, operating systems, databases, web servers, etc.
4:00 PM
CPU Load > 90%
Allocate COD
Reducing CPU
Load to 50%
CPU Pool
6:00 PM
CPU Load < 50%
De-Allocate COD
returning CPUs to
Pool
Resource Monitor
Allocate
COD
De-allocate
COD
4:00 PM
CPU Load > 90%
Allocate COD
Reducing CPU
Load to 50%
CPU Pool
6:00 PM
CPU Load < 50%
De-Allocate COD
returning CPUs to
Pool
Resource Monitor
Allocate
COD
De-allocate
COD
Resource Monitor
Allocate
COD
De-allocate
COD
Capacity on Demand: Ability to dynamically
allocate additional compute capacity (CPU, RAM, Storage,
etc.) to multiple virtualized environments as needed.
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 1
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 1
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 5
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 5
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 2
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 2
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 6
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 6
OS
DB (N) DB (N+1)Scheme1
Scheme2
Scheme3
Scheme4
Scheme5
Scheme6
OS
DB (N) DB (N+1)Scheme1
Scheme2
Scheme3
Scheme4
Scheme5
Scheme6
Data Base Stacking
OS
App1
App2
App3
App4
App5
App6
OS
App1
App2
App3
App4
App5
App6
URL Stacking
OS
Web Srv
(N)
Web Srv
(N+1)
URL1
URL2
URL3
URL4
URL5
URL6
OS
Web Srv
(N)
Web Srv
(N+1)
URL1
URL2
URL3
URL4
URL5
URL6
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 3
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 3
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 4
OS
DB
Web Srv
App 4
Virtualization: Establishment of ‘virtual’ compute environments
from a larger pool of resources. Enablers include enterprise servers
with virtualization capabilities and VM software solutions.
March 30, 2015
Property of United
24
Current United Stationers Design
Tier 1 - applications replicated using EMC’s SRDF/A
Tier 2 - supported by SRDF/A or DoubleTake software
Tier 3 - utilize tape recovery (with some tape virtualization)
Internet
High Speed
Network
MPLS WAN
Production
Data Center
Non-Production
Data Center
United Stationers
March 30, 2015
Property of United
25
Cost-effective DR Architecture
Take advantage of technology refresh cycles
» Older equipment becomes DR / test environment
Use application and database stacking
Utilize ‘owned’ space where possible
» Remote call centers, facilities, parent data centers
» Small footprint co-location if necessary
Perform market-based risk analysis, and target recovery
plan towards most likely scenarios
The ‘doughnut tire’ approach…
Maintain the minimum DR capacity to get through a crisis
The ‘doughnut tire’ approach…
Maintain the minimum DR capacity to get through a crisis
March 30, 2015
Property of United
26
Scenario Pre-Planning
Impact
Likelihood
Power Failure
Facility Loss
Facility Uninhabitable
Facility Inaccessible
Hurricane
Disaster mitigation efforts
prioritized based upon:
• Likelihood
• Impact
Focus placed on higher impact,
higher probability events
Limited resources expended on
items inside the red curve
Hurricane and inaccessible
facility (flooding) deemed
largest risks.
He who defends everything defends nothing ~ Frederick the Great
March 30, 2015
Property of United
27
Creating Value in a Difficult Economy
IT
Spending
Percentage
Operations /
Maintenance /
KTLO
Strategic
Infrastructure
Current
Spend
New
Applications
Application
Modification
New
Spend
Non-Discretionary IT SpendingDiscretionary IT Spending
Cost-effective, targeted DR
will be a critical component
for reducing operational
expenses.
As pressures to control operating expenses increase, IT departments will
be forced to make trade-offs between strategic and non-strategic initiatives.
Differentiating
technologies
Protect investments
in this area…
March 30, 2015
Property of United
28
One Last Point… The People Element
During a disaster, what are your associate’s priorities?
» Safety, family, property, (employment)
» How much focus will they devote to company objectives?
» Create steps to mitigate associate concerns
What will be the long-term impacts?
» “Liberation Effect”
• People view disaster as a life-changing
event (and an opportunity)
• Career changes, relocations, etc.
» Post-traumatic stress disorder
• Irrational decision making
• Shock, depression
How will you be affected…?
Maslow’s Hierarchy
Physiological Needs
Survival Needs
Belonging Needs
Esteem Needs
Understanding
Aesthetic
Transcendance
Self-Actualization
March 30, 2015
Property of United
29
Final Recommendations
Lead formal application tiering exercise with business
leadership
»E-mail is Tier 1, regardless of business determination
»Include personnel availability assumptions in planning
Seek out and eliminate all examples of ‘hard-coding’
Use sound technology architectural principles everyday
(corollary: the more complex your environment, the more
complex it is to recover)
Use application and database stacking in recovery center
Capacity on demand is an option, albeit expensive
Make testing as real as possible
March 30, 2015
Property of United
30
Final Recommendations (cont.)
Work with the business to build effective (but simple) BCP
Review all major supplier contracts for ‘force majeure’
exclusions
Create a robust communication strategy
»Avoid cell-phones as primary
»Create fail-safe contact methodology (associate web-site, alternate
phone number, etc)
Provide all critical team members with laptops and remote
connectivity (i.e. VPN or Citrix)
March 30, 2015
Property of United
31
Questions?
March 30, 2015
Property of United
32
Contact Information
Marshall Lancaster
Vice President – I.T.
Enterprise Infrastructure Services
United Stationers Inc.
E-mail: mlancaster@ussco.com
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mlancaster
(O): (847) 627-2780
(F): (847) 627-7780
Marshall Lancaster
Vice President – I.T.
Enterprise Infrastructure Services
United Stationers Inc.
E-mail: mlancaster@ussco.com
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mlancaster
(O): (847) 627-2780
(F): (847) 627-7780

More Related Content

Similar to Katrina Recovery - Lagasse Inc

EarthLink Business - Business Continuity
EarthLink Business - Business ContinuityEarthLink Business - Business Continuity
EarthLink Business - Business Continuity
Mike Ricca
 
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster RecoveryEarthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
Mike Ricca
 
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-studyCDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
joepanora
 
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-studyCDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
joepanora
 
Business continuity and disaster recovery
Business continuity and disaster recoveryBusiness continuity and disaster recovery
Business continuity and disaster recovery
Adeel Javaid
 
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloningData Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
Kyle Hailey
 
Nyoug delphix slideshare
Nyoug delphix slideshareNyoug delphix slideshare
Nyoug delphix slideshare
Kyle Hailey
 

Similar to Katrina Recovery - Lagasse Inc (20)

EarthLink Business - Business Continuity
EarthLink Business - Business ContinuityEarthLink Business - Business Continuity
EarthLink Business - Business Continuity
 
Chicago Tribune's Server Consolidation a Success
Chicago Tribune's Server Consolidation a SuccessChicago Tribune's Server Consolidation a Success
Chicago Tribune's Server Consolidation a Success
 
Protect and Save your firm from data loses caused by disasters
Protect and Save your firm from data loses caused by disastersProtect and Save your firm from data loses caused by disasters
Protect and Save your firm from data loses caused by disasters
 
November 2014 Webinar - Disaster Recovery Worthy of a Zombie Apocalypse
November 2014 Webinar - Disaster Recovery Worthy of a Zombie ApocalypseNovember 2014 Webinar - Disaster Recovery Worthy of a Zombie Apocalypse
November 2014 Webinar - Disaster Recovery Worthy of a Zombie Apocalypse
 
Presentation by Ivan Schotsmans (DV Community) at the Data Vault Modelling an...
Presentation by Ivan Schotsmans (DV Community) at the Data Vault Modelling an...Presentation by Ivan Schotsmans (DV Community) at the Data Vault Modelling an...
Presentation by Ivan Schotsmans (DV Community) at the Data Vault Modelling an...
 
Disaster Recovery
Disaster RecoveryDisaster Recovery
Disaster Recovery
 
Backups and Disaster Recovery for Nonprofits
Backups and Disaster Recovery for NonprofitsBackups and Disaster Recovery for Nonprofits
Backups and Disaster Recovery for Nonprofits
 
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster RecoveryEarthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
Earthlink Business Cloud Disaster Recovery
 
IT service provider, IT outsourcing, OneNeck IT Services
IT service provider, IT outsourcing, OneNeck IT ServicesIT service provider, IT outsourcing, OneNeck IT Services
IT service provider, IT outsourcing, OneNeck IT Services
 
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-studyCDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
 
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-studyCDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
CDRC Oracle exadata final case-study
 
How to Restructure Active Directory with ZeroIMPACT
How to Restructure Active Directory with ZeroIMPACTHow to Restructure Active Directory with ZeroIMPACT
How to Restructure Active Directory with ZeroIMPACT
 
Business continuity and disaster recovery
Business continuity and disaster recoveryBusiness continuity and disaster recovery
Business continuity and disaster recovery
 
How to Restructure and Modernize Active Directory
How to Restructure and Modernize Active DirectoryHow to Restructure and Modernize Active Directory
How to Restructure and Modernize Active Directory
 
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloningData Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
Data Virtualization: revolutionizing database cloning
 
Will You Be Prepared When The Next Disaster Strikes - Whitepaper
Will You Be Prepared When The Next Disaster Strikes - WhitepaperWill You Be Prepared When The Next Disaster Strikes - Whitepaper
Will You Be Prepared When The Next Disaster Strikes - Whitepaper
 
Trends in Government ICT - Chasing Data, Information, and Decision Support
Trends in Government ICT - Chasing Data, Information, and Decision SupportTrends in Government ICT - Chasing Data, Information, and Decision Support
Trends in Government ICT - Chasing Data, Information, and Decision Support
 
Nyoug delphix slideshare
Nyoug delphix slideshareNyoug delphix slideshare
Nyoug delphix slideshare
 
Database :Introduction to Database System
Database :Introduction to Database SystemDatabase :Introduction to Database System
Database :Introduction to Database System
 
The key to unlocking the Value in the IoT? Managing the Data!
The key to unlocking the Value in the IoT? Managing the Data!The key to unlocking the Value in the IoT? Managing the Data!
The key to unlocking the Value in the IoT? Managing the Data!
 

Recently uploaded

Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdfForbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
UK Journal
 

Recently uploaded (8)

Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdfForbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
 
Decentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in IndiaDecentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in India
 
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdfIncome Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
 
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdfPress-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
 
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdfAnalyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
 
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In MusinaTop^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
 

Katrina Recovery - Lagasse Inc

  • 1. Property of United Stationers Inc 1 Surviving Katrina Marshall Lancaster April 2nd , 2008
  • 2. March 30, 2015 Property of United 2 Agenda Introduction Katrina Overview and Impact Case Study: Lagasse Katrina Recovery » Business overview and history » Key terms » Business imperatives during Hurricane Katrina » Lagasse DR design and results General recommendations » “Best practices” for DR » Cost-effective DR » Lessons learned and recommendations Review / Questions and Answers
  • 3. March 30, 2015 Property of United 3 Introduction In August, 2005, Lagasse Inc. was headquartered in New Orleans, LA. Hurricane Katrina and the subsequent events made the entire area inaccessible, including the primary computing facility and customer care center. As a result of the storm, Lagasse experienced no system down-time, and recorded it’s second and third largest sales days in the week following. In addition, the ability to quickly redeploy personnel allowed a major acquisition and integration effort to continue on schedule.
  • 4. March 30, 2015 Property of United 4 Hurricane Katrina Overview Made second U.S. landfall as a Category 3/4 Hurricane » Initially impacted Florida as a Category 1 » Massive storm, briefly a Category 5 • New Orleans received sustained Cat 1 / Cat 2 winds for several hours » Levees breached in 73 locations • Major failures: 17th Street Canal, Industrial Canal, London Avenue Canal • 80% of New Orleans flooded » Over 1,400 lives lost in the aftermath • 1,100 in New Orleans Massive relocation resulted » Over 6,000 evacuees in Chicago (the largest non-Southern migration)
  • 5. March 30, 2015 Property of United 5 Regional Impact Assessment Immediate loss of all critical infrastructure services » Power, water, food, fuel » Medical and police severely strained First 14 days: » Most basic infrastructure still off-line » Access to city highly restricted by local and federal authorities 15 days to present: » Slow, arduous recovery process with on-going structural problems » Huge deficit of professional talent due to massive relocations » Persistently degraded socials services (medical, educational, etc.)
  • 6. March 30, 2015 Property of United 6 Lagasse Business Overview Wholesale distribution company focused on Janitorial -Sanitation, Foodservice, and Paper products »Over 1,000 associates nationwide »2007 Gross Sales approx. $750M »31 Warehouse facilities Immediately prior to Katrina, acquired Sweet Paper Sales Corporation, with 10 facilities and $250M in annual sales Lagasse is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Stationers, a $4.5B broad-line wholesale distribution company (NASDAQ:USTR)
  • 7. March 30, 2015 Property of United 7 Hurricane Katrina Primary Lagasse data center located in New Orleans, LA. Impacted business functions: »Largest Customer Call Center »New Orleans Distribution Facility »Operations Procurement »Marketing Pricing Product Management »Accounting Finance Executive »Information Technology Most Information Technology staff were based out of New Orleans Over 200 associates were displaced, the majority in professional and support activities. 90% of administrative capacity was disrupted
  • 8. March 30, 2015 Property of United 8 Associates (Before the Storm) = ~25 associates Associates (One Week After the Storm) = Data Center = Warehouse hub = Warehouse
  • 9. March 30, 2015 Property of United 9 Lagasse / Katrina Timeline
  • 10. March 30, 2015 Property of United 10 Major Timeline E-commerce Implementation SP Facility Integration - Raleigh Disaster Recovery Effort Disaster Asset Recovery Team (DART) Business Recovery Effort (BCP) New Orleans Headquarters Closed IT Team Move (Chicago) SP Facility Integration - Boston SP Facility Integration – San Francisco SOX Compliance Audit SP Facility Integration - Atlanta SP Facility Integration - Tampa Aug DecSept Oct Nov Jan ‘06
  • 11. March 30, 2015 Property of United 11 Key Terms Recovery Point Objective (RPO): maximum amount of data loss that is deemed acceptable by data owners / business Recovery Time Objective (RTO): maximum period during which data can be unavailable for access or modification Seven Tiers of Disaster Recovery (SHARE 1992): »Tier 0: No recovery capabilities »Tier 1: Tape backup, no off-site hardware »Tier 2: Tape backup, with off-site hardware »Tier 3: Electronic vaulting – across the wire protection of some data »Tier 4: Point-in-time-copies »Tier 5: Transaction integrity »Tier 6: Zero or near-zero data loss »Tier 7: Highly automated integrated solutions NotadoptedbyLagasse
  • 12. March 30, 2015 Property of United 12 Lagasse DR Plan Multiple ‘dry-runs’ had improved capabilities » (2002) Hurricanes Isadore, Lilli » (2004) Hurricane Ivan » (2005) Hurricane Dennis Established three application tiers for planning recovery » Tier 1: Required for pick, pack, ship, and manual order entry • Semi-automated recovery • 0-15 minutes of data loss, 6 hour recovery » Tier 2: Platforms critical for consistent customer experience • Limited staff required to recover • 0-24 hours of data loss, 24-72 hours to recover » Tier 3: Computing resources that support reporting, administration • Specialized staff required to recover, no commitment to recover Planning is the act of trading chaos for error ~ Author unknown
  • 13. March 30, 2015 Property of United 13 Lagasse Computing Environment
  • 14. March 30, 2015 Property of United 14 Lagasse Computing Environment (cont.) Geographically diverse (Chicago backup DC) Leveraged parent-company infrastructure Simplified architecture: avoided application and infrastructure complexity whenever possible Utilized technology refresh cycles to redeploy old production equipment into DR ‘Blended’ recovery approach: range of SHARE DR tiers 1 through 6, depending on application importance and complexity Supportive processes and technologies in place »Database Transaction Logging (i.e. Oracle Archive Re-do) »DNS / DHCP
  • 15. March 30, 2015 Property of United 15 ERP Recovery Database log files are generated to /db/dbrecover Log files are FTP’d to remote server directory »Only new files are migrated »Utilizes sequence numbering UNIX cron job runs hourly to ‘roll forward’ the database transactions on backup server » Limitation: DR database cannot be used for testing Additional process automates replication for key UNIX files and directories (i.e. /etc/passwd, printer defs, etc.) ProductionProduction ServerServer /db/dbrecover/db/dbrecover Backup / TestBackup / Test ServerServer /db/dbrecover/db/dbrecover DB file01 DB file02 DB filexx…
  • 16. March 30, 2015 Property of United 16 Network Recovery All IP address-based connectivity was removed and replaced with DNS naming system Recovery configurations for routers were stored on remote host servers »Changes to ‘IP Helper’ statements cause redirection of DHCP and DNS requests »NAT statements utilized to redirect any systems that do not support DNS (TFTP, remote terminal services, etc.) High bandwidth link used for file synchronization becomes primary connectivity mode for remote warehouses and call centers
  • 17. March 30, 2015 Property of United 17 Systems Recovery - Various E-storefront » Tape restore to like hardware for initial build » Code changes manually passed across WAN » Configuration changes required: • Messaging • E-storefront DB • Catalog DB • Application integration layer EDI » External DNS re-targeted to Chicago host address Application Integration Suite » Tape restore to like hardware for initial build » Incremental changes and patches passed across WAN Document Imaging System » Replaced older document imaging system, deployed to Chicago in known working state » All production config changes made to backup system Small Parcel Shipping » Automatically handled as part of DNS re-pointing
  • 18. March 30, 2015 Property of United 18 Systems Recovery - Failed Legacy E-commerce / E-storefront » Restore from backup tape was only partially successful » Heavy modification of original source code prevented ‘clean install’ » Old environment recovered as part of ‘DART’ (Disaster Asset Recovery Team), which was an effort that recovered viable technology assets from the New Orleans data center » Resolved by moving customers to new product Hyperion Data Warehouse » Tape recovery proved unsuccessful, and staff with the knowledge to rebuild were not available for almost 3 weeks » Recovered as part of DART Activity Based Costing System » Tape unsuccessful, recovered during DART
  • 19. March 30, 2015 Property of United 19 Business Continuity Headquarters relocated to United Stationers corporate offices in Chicago ‘Southeast Headquarters’ set up in Atlanta in order to support displaced professional workers Temporary ‘remote’ call centers established in Dallas, Atlanta, San Antonio, and Miami Due to the on-going integration of Sweet Paper, project teams had to be re-assembled quickly »First 2-3 weeks spent rebuilding contact information »IT support re-assembled in Chicago, Oaks, Atlanta »Many associates become ‘virtualized’ – operate from hotels, new houses, Internet cafes
  • 20. March 30, 2015 Property of United 20 Lessons Learned Do not locate your primary data systems in New Orleans! (other cities may not be great choices, either…) Tape recovery is extremely complex, and not very reliable Communication quickly breaks down during disaster »Cell phones are nearly useless if homed in disaster area »Associate web-site (alternate DNS) and alternate associate hot-line were invaluable fall-backs Laptops, Citrix, and VPN are powerful BCP tools People are more important than plan… »It all starts with hiring / development »Can they be where you need them when the time comes?
  • 21. March 30, 2015 Property of United 21 Lessons Learned (cont.) A robust DRP is only part of the answer; a solid BCP completes the puzzle ‘Force Majeure’ clauses exist in most off-site storage vendor contracts and agreements
  • 22. March 30, 2015 Property of United 22 Best Practices DR Architecture Rely on best-in-class co-location partner » Provides security, power, cooling, and fire suppression management » Geographically diverse, preferably +200 miles between DCs Select premier storage supplier » Block-level replication for Tier 1, file-level for Tier 2 » Tape recovery reserved for Tier 3 Create network architecture with telecommunications provider redundancy and ‘last-mile’ diversity Automated fail-over, clustering Build highly specialized technical competencies » Required to support complex recovery environment
  • 23. March 30, 2015 Property of United 23 Supporting Technologies Application Stacking: Hosting multiple applications within the same compute environment. Applications share hardware, operating systems, databases, web servers, etc. 4:00 PM CPU Load > 90% Allocate COD Reducing CPU Load to 50% CPU Pool 6:00 PM CPU Load < 50% De-Allocate COD returning CPUs to Pool Resource Monitor Allocate COD De-allocate COD 4:00 PM CPU Load > 90% Allocate COD Reducing CPU Load to 50% CPU Pool 6:00 PM CPU Load < 50% De-Allocate COD returning CPUs to Pool Resource Monitor Allocate COD De-allocate COD Resource Monitor Allocate COD De-allocate COD Capacity on Demand: Ability to dynamically allocate additional compute capacity (CPU, RAM, Storage, etc.) to multiple virtualized environments as needed. OS DB Web Srv App 1 OS DB Web Srv App 1 OS DB Web Srv App 5 OS DB Web Srv App 5 OS DB Web Srv App 2 OS DB Web Srv App 2 OS DB Web Srv App 6 OS DB Web Srv App 6 OS DB (N) DB (N+1)Scheme1 Scheme2 Scheme3 Scheme4 Scheme5 Scheme6 OS DB (N) DB (N+1)Scheme1 Scheme2 Scheme3 Scheme4 Scheme5 Scheme6 Data Base Stacking OS App1 App2 App3 App4 App5 App6 OS App1 App2 App3 App4 App5 App6 URL Stacking OS Web Srv (N) Web Srv (N+1) URL1 URL2 URL3 URL4 URL5 URL6 OS Web Srv (N) Web Srv (N+1) URL1 URL2 URL3 URL4 URL5 URL6 OS DB Web Srv App 3 OS DB Web Srv App 3 OS DB Web Srv App 4 OS DB Web Srv App 4 Virtualization: Establishment of ‘virtual’ compute environments from a larger pool of resources. Enablers include enterprise servers with virtualization capabilities and VM software solutions.
  • 24. March 30, 2015 Property of United 24 Current United Stationers Design Tier 1 - applications replicated using EMC’s SRDF/A Tier 2 - supported by SRDF/A or DoubleTake software Tier 3 - utilize tape recovery (with some tape virtualization) Internet High Speed Network MPLS WAN Production Data Center Non-Production Data Center United Stationers
  • 25. March 30, 2015 Property of United 25 Cost-effective DR Architecture Take advantage of technology refresh cycles » Older equipment becomes DR / test environment Use application and database stacking Utilize ‘owned’ space where possible » Remote call centers, facilities, parent data centers » Small footprint co-location if necessary Perform market-based risk analysis, and target recovery plan towards most likely scenarios The ‘doughnut tire’ approach… Maintain the minimum DR capacity to get through a crisis The ‘doughnut tire’ approach… Maintain the minimum DR capacity to get through a crisis
  • 26. March 30, 2015 Property of United 26 Scenario Pre-Planning Impact Likelihood Power Failure Facility Loss Facility Uninhabitable Facility Inaccessible Hurricane Disaster mitigation efforts prioritized based upon: • Likelihood • Impact Focus placed on higher impact, higher probability events Limited resources expended on items inside the red curve Hurricane and inaccessible facility (flooding) deemed largest risks. He who defends everything defends nothing ~ Frederick the Great
  • 27. March 30, 2015 Property of United 27 Creating Value in a Difficult Economy IT Spending Percentage Operations / Maintenance / KTLO Strategic Infrastructure Current Spend New Applications Application Modification New Spend Non-Discretionary IT SpendingDiscretionary IT Spending Cost-effective, targeted DR will be a critical component for reducing operational expenses. As pressures to control operating expenses increase, IT departments will be forced to make trade-offs between strategic and non-strategic initiatives. Differentiating technologies Protect investments in this area…
  • 28. March 30, 2015 Property of United 28 One Last Point… The People Element During a disaster, what are your associate’s priorities? » Safety, family, property, (employment) » How much focus will they devote to company objectives? » Create steps to mitigate associate concerns What will be the long-term impacts? » “Liberation Effect” • People view disaster as a life-changing event (and an opportunity) • Career changes, relocations, etc. » Post-traumatic stress disorder • Irrational decision making • Shock, depression How will you be affected…? Maslow’s Hierarchy Physiological Needs Survival Needs Belonging Needs Esteem Needs Understanding Aesthetic Transcendance Self-Actualization
  • 29. March 30, 2015 Property of United 29 Final Recommendations Lead formal application tiering exercise with business leadership »E-mail is Tier 1, regardless of business determination »Include personnel availability assumptions in planning Seek out and eliminate all examples of ‘hard-coding’ Use sound technology architectural principles everyday (corollary: the more complex your environment, the more complex it is to recover) Use application and database stacking in recovery center Capacity on demand is an option, albeit expensive Make testing as real as possible
  • 30. March 30, 2015 Property of United 30 Final Recommendations (cont.) Work with the business to build effective (but simple) BCP Review all major supplier contracts for ‘force majeure’ exclusions Create a robust communication strategy »Avoid cell-phones as primary »Create fail-safe contact methodology (associate web-site, alternate phone number, etc) Provide all critical team members with laptops and remote connectivity (i.e. VPN or Citrix)
  • 31. March 30, 2015 Property of United 31 Questions?
  • 32. March 30, 2015 Property of United 32 Contact Information Marshall Lancaster Vice President – I.T. Enterprise Infrastructure Services United Stationers Inc. E-mail: mlancaster@ussco.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mlancaster (O): (847) 627-2780 (F): (847) 627-7780 Marshall Lancaster Vice President – I.T. Enterprise Infrastructure Services United Stationers Inc. E-mail: mlancaster@ussco.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mlancaster (O): (847) 627-2780 (F): (847) 627-7780

Editor's Notes

  1. &amp;lt;number&amp;gt;