The document discusses the film distribution industry and the debate around whether audiences or distributors hold more power in influencing what films are made and seen. It provides definitions of key terms like distributor and describes the roles and responsibilities of distributors. Some key statistics are presented on worldwide spending on films, average production and marketing costs, and revenue streams. The types of UK distributors and factors considered in acquiring and releasing films are also summarized.

1. AS Media Studies
Study Notes
Unit G322 Section B
Audiences and Institutions
The Film Industry
Part 6
Distribution
78

2. Film Distribution
Consider these two competing views of who holds the most power in terms of influencing
what films get made and seen:
If you break it down and look at it as a business then the audience has the greatest power. It's
the audience that tells you what they like. So if the audience likes a particular superstar, then
Hollywood is forced to use the superstar and that star then becomes extremely powerful.
(Tony Angellotti)
In a world where money spent on the budget of a film often sees50 % going on promotion as
opposed to what you actually see on screen, the idea that we have a world where the consumer
can exercise authority is absurd. This industry is like any other. Of course it has to sell things,
but it doesn't rely on waiting, listening, responding to what audiences want and then delivering
that to them. It relies on knowing which parts of the world and the media need its products and
will pay for them. (Toby Miller)
They can't both be right and you therefore need to come to an informed judgement on this
dynamic. In the case of film marketing, it is a complex issue.
Q1. Did millions of people go to see
Pirates of the Caribbean 2 in the first
week of release because it is such a great
film, or because it was so well marketed?
Or both?It took $135.6 million in its
opening weekend in the US alone, 32% of
its final total gross, FYI…
Definition of a distributor
A distributor is the link between the film-
makers and the public, and allows a film to reach the public via the cinemas, DVDand on
television. There are a number of distribution companies in the UK, all with different styles,
funding structures, aims and marketing plans, all trying to sell their films in an incredibly
competitive environment. Back in Section 2 we looked at Film Distribution in the UK – here
we’re taking a more global view.
Each distribution company takes on a certain number of titles each year and creates an
individual release-plan for those films. Their responsibilities include:
o deciding on a release date;
o deciding how many prints to produce and in which cinemas to screen them;
o advertising campaigns;
o designing art work for adverts, posters, flyers and billboards;
o organising premieres and talker screenings;
o booking talent (i.e. the stars or director) for press interviews and personal
appearances.
Distributors are also responsible for negotiating deals regarding the film's release on video
and DVD, and showings on television, cable and satellite channels.
A film could come to the distributor in a range of ways —films produced by the main
79

3. American studios will be distributed through their own companies, so Warner Bros. will
distribute their own films as will 20th Century Fox and Buena Vista International will distribute
Disney films as it is the Disney distribution 'arm'.
Some films are seen at film festivals and are picked up through complicated negotiations with
sales agents and producers so deals can be struck in different territories (i.e. North America,
Europe, Asia, Australasia).
Some Background Facts and
Statistics
Worldwide spend on films is around $68 billion a
year, of which the distributors' share is about $38
billion. Total revenues are split almost equally
between the North American market and the Rest of
the World. The industry has doubled in size since
2000 - an annual growth rate of almost 10%. Few, if
any, major businesses can boast such continued
growth over this period. DVD has contributed
significantly to the growth levels. DVD sales have
seen a tenfold rise in the last few years.
The average cost for an American studio film is now
more than $50m with a further $30m spent on
marketing (up from $8m and $3m respectively in
1980).
Theatrical (i.e. cinema) revenues only account for
about 25% of the total profit, with DVD taking
about 40%; television screening accounting for 28%
and ancillary revenues the final 7%.
The main revenue streams for filmed entertainment are:
1. Theatrical (cinema) exhibition
2. DVD/Blu-ray rental
3. DVD/Blu-ray retail
4. Pay per View Television
5. Subscription or Pay Television
6. Free to air Television
The industry maximises revenues at each stage of the chain and avoids any clashes in the
marketplace. Release windows are starting to close up as the DVD streams start to eclipse
the original release in terms of revenue (although the cinematic shop window still remains
the main driver of revenues throughout the chain in most cases) but are roughly as indicated
below:
Theatrical: 0 - 6 Months
DVD/Blu-ray: 6 - 12 Months
Pay Per View: 12 - 15 Months
Pay TV: 15 - 20 Months
Free TV: 20 + Months
80

4. The success of the home DVD market has led to increased pressure on the DVD rental
window with some of the major distributors keen to put their product into the retail market
place as soon as possible. In the immediate future more films will be released simultaneously
into the rental and sell-through DVD/VOD windows. The rental window, which currently
lasts for about six months before titles go into retail outlets, may be closed altogether before
too long. This may also lead to the Pay per View window moving forwards with titles
reaching television screens within 9 to 12 months of their theatrical release.
Theatrical Distribution Deals
The share of Box Office paid over to distributors varies between territories. The typical
exhibitor's share in the US is 45% and in the Rest of the World 55%. The UK has some of
the highest retentions by the exhibitor, averaging around 65%.
Quick reminder - Types of UK distributors
In the UK, distributors are divided into the majors and the independents.
The Majors
The majors are those affiliated to the biggest Hollywood companies and are:
Warner Bros. (18.3%);
20th Century Fox (15.9%);
Paramount (14.8%);
Walt Disney/Buena Vista International (14%);
United International Pictures (UIP) who release films from Universal and MGM
studios(10.2%).
The films released by the majors tend to be mainstream Hollywood blockbusters as well as
UK/USA co-productions. Most companies have an 'indiewood' arm such as Fox Searchlight
or Focus Features (Universal) that will take risks on films that are not such commercial
blockbusters.
The Independents
These are companies who release a much wider range of films, and include Artificial Eye,
Metrodome andMomentum. Titles will include foreign language films, documentaries,
re-releases and non-mainstream Hollywood/UK titles picked up at film festivals across
the world.Entertainment Distribution is an unusual case in that it is a UK independent that has a
long standing relationship with US studio New Line Cinema (a unit of the Time Warner
Corporation). Entertainment release their titles in the UK, therefore getting such films as Lord
Of the Rings as well as small UK films. (http://www.entertainmentfilms.co.uk)
Acquiring a film
A distributor can acquire the rights to release a film in the UK in a number of different
ways:
directly from their parent studio (i.e. Universal through UIP);
through a deal a distributor may have with a production company or studio;
a distributor may be approached by a third party sales agent;
a distributor may attend a film festival and approach a sales agent after watching a
film at a screening.
81

5. A distribution deal is different for every film, and will include theatrical rights (i.e. the
screening of the film in cinemas), and possibly the release of the film on DVD as well as TV
and satellite rights.
Releasing a film
Hollywood distributors will consider their release strategies from (at least) four perspectives:
Global: where will the film work?
Regional: how will we make it work in (say) Europe?
National: how should we release it in each country?
Local: are there any particular local conditions that need to be taken into account within
each country?
Many things have to be taken into consideration when distributors choose a release date for a
movie. School holidays in Easter, half term, summer and Christmas tend to be the time when big
family movies are set for release. Big national sporting events, particularly when England are
taking part, such as the European Championships and the World Cup can affect audiences, so
care is taken about releasing male-orientated, action-type movies at that time.
It is also crucial to know the landscape with regard to film and media related events
happening nationally and most importantly, what else is being released at the time. The last
thing you want is your film being released on the weekend The Lord of the Rings: The
Return ofthe King (2003) or Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008), are
released, both of which will swamp the media and the national consciousness (unless, that is,
you are consciously positioning the marketing strategy in opposition to these blockbusters).
Box office - A film's performance in the cinema is judged on the box-office figures. Box-office
figures are based on the number of people who purchase a ticket to see a particular film and
what they pay: it is the accumulated cost of tickets which equals the box-office figure. The US
box-office figures will give a rough indication of how successful a film might be in the UK.
For most films, almost 40% of total Box Office will be taken in the first week, with the
majority of that arriving in the first weekend. Takings tend to fall to about 5% of the total by
the sixth week of release (if the film has lasted that long). Oscar winning films have tended
recently to gross more internationally than at the US Box Office, partly because the release
pattern means that their Academy Award success can be used in the International marketing
campaigns. Films like The English Patient (1997), Slumdog Millionaire (2008), The King’s
Speech (2010) are good examples of this.
82

6. Case Study – United International Pictures (UIP)
Whenever you visit the cinema, there's a strong chance that the film you are watching is one
handled by United International Pictures (UIP).
UIP is jointly owned by two of Hollywood biggest
studios, Paramount and Universal. They channel the
films they produce through UIP, which is responsible
for distributing them to cinemas in the international
marketplace outside North America. UIP also handles
films from their non-mainstream divisions, Paramount
Classics and Universal Focus.Stephen Spielberg's studio
Dreamworks also distributes its films around the world
through UIP. Furthermore, UIP will acquire and
distribute films made by independent producers in local
and international markets.
Since its launch in 1981, UIP reckons it has distributed over 1,000 films internationally -
including Shrek, Love Actually, Jurassic Park, Collateral, Mission Impossible, and Bridget
Jones: The Edge Of Reason.It is a huge and complex operation, with offices in 35 countries
stretching from Russia to New Zealand and South Africa to Singapore. It also has
representatives or agents working in another 23 countries. Its takings from the global box
office in 2003 stood at nearly $2 billion.
An important focus for UIP at the moment is expanding into what it regards as growth
markets, in particular countries with huge potential like China and Russia.UIPs global
operation, which employs 700 people around the world, is co-ordinated from a small tower
block office in Hammersmith, West London, with 150 staff. Key departments include the
marketing and distribution teams, which liaise with the US studio parent companies and UIP
offices around the world to agree release dates as well as marketing and press strategies for
films.
However, UIP chairman and chief executive officer Stewart
Till (pictured right), says: "We try to let the territories be as
autonomous as possible and empower them as much as we
can." The Hammersmith HQ also includes departments such as
human resources, business affairs and finance.Also in London
is UIP's separate UK distribution office, based in Golden
Square in London's Soho. Run by Chris Hedges and employing
35 staff, the operation consists of a sales and distribution team
responsible for booking UIP films into theatres throughout the
UK, as well as a PR and marketing unit charged with
generating press coverage and reviews of films and for running
marketing campaigns.
Q2. Prepare a 10 slide Powerpoint on UIP as a company. Who are they? Who are
they owned by? What do they do? Why are UIP virtually guaranteed to be successful?
Find some recent releases by UIP to use as examples. Think about the kind of
companies backing them?(http://www.uip.com/)
83

7. Film Classification
Before a film can be shown to a paying audience, it is required by law that it is
certificated by the British Board of Film Classification. This ensures, for example, that
films which are of an adult nature are not shown to children.
Distributors must submit their films to be watched by examiners who write reports
describing each film and justifying the decisions they have reached. The cost to the
distributor is roughly £9.50 per minute, so classification of an average film costs
around £800 – £1100.
The British Board of Film Classification produces a set of guidelines which are easily
obtained for your reference from the organisation's website (www.bbfc.co.uk). The BBFC is
not a separate entity from the film industry or a government department. It is a self-
regulatory body as it is made up of film industry representatives. But despite this, this is the
one area of film distribution over which the makers and promoters of a specific film have
limited control. It is possible for a film to be targeted and promoted for a particular audience
group such as 15 and over, only for the BBFC to impose an 18 certificate, although this is
rare.
The film certificate influences the marketing campaign of the film since this will need
to be pitched at the age range indicated by the certificate. A distributor may indicate to
the Board which certificate they are hoping the film will be awarded, for example, a
PG certificate to allow a wider audience to see the film. The Board, in turn, might
suggest cuts are made in order for it to get this certificate.
Conversely, there might be times when a higher rather than a lower certificate will
actually help to sell a film. For a thriller or a horror film to be rated 18 will do more
for it than if it were to be awarded a 15 certificate.
In 2008, 639 films were classified of which 7
had to make cuts - 4 at the 15 rating, 2 at 12A
and 1 at PG.
The BBFC's guidelines state that there are three
main considerations for any film:
1 Legal (material may break the law—-there
are several laws to do with obscenity,
equality, incitement and the protection of
children)
2 Protective (material is scrutinised for its
potential to cause 'harm' though this is a
huge area for debate—who decides who
needs protecting from what?)
3 Societal (material is reviewed with broader
public opinion in mind with particular regard
to language).
The second and third considerations are more
significant in stipulating an age classification
84

8. for a film. It is important to recognise that the BBFC make recommendations, but it is
possible for local authorities not to comply and either allow films to be exhibited to a wider
age range than the BBFC recommends, or to deny younger viewers access in the locality, or
even to ban a film from release in the area. This hardly ever happens, but a famous example
was the decision of Westminster Council to ban the screening of David Cronenberg'sCrash
(1996), which was given an 18 certificate elsewhere.
The BBFC's relationship with Government is known, rather misogynistically, as a
'Gentleman's Understanding'which means that Parliament observes from a distance and the
BBFC regulates itself in accordance with the political climate established by the Government
(stricter or more liberal depending on who is in power). During the New Labour Blair/Brown
era, the BBFC has been more relaxed about material for the 18 certificate, but ‘tougher’
when considering material for younger children.
It is important to be aware of classification as an
element in'gate keeping'the distribution process. The
classifications, as published in the BBFC guidelines,
are as follows:
U: Universal (suitable for all).
PG: Parental Guidance (general viewing, some scenes
may beunsuitable for young children).
12 and 12A: Suitable for 12 years and older. No one
younger than12 may see a 12A film in a cinema
unless accompanied by anadult. No one younger than
12 may rent or buy a 12 rated DVD. Responsibility
for allowing under 12s to view lies withthe
accompanying or supervising adult.
15: Suitable only for 15 years and over. No one
younger than 15 may see a 15 film in a cinema. No
one younger than 15 mayrent or buy a 15 rated DVD.
18: Suitable only for adults. No one younger than 18
may see an18 film in a cinema. No one younger than
18 may rent or buyan 18 rated DVD.
R18: To be shown only in specially licensed cinemas,
or suppliedonly in licensed sex shops, and to adults of
not less than 18years.(Source: BBFC guidelines)
85

9. Classification Case Studies - Spiderman (2002) & The Dark
Knight (2008)
The BBFC announced in September 2000
that it would look at the possibility of
making the '12' cinema category advisory,
like 'U' and 'PG'. This was in response to
complaints from parents - particularly
whenever a new James Bond film came
out - who felt that they were better placed
to decide which films their under 12s
could cope with.
In 2001 they carried out a pilot in
Norwich. The outcome was that the public
was only in favour of making the '12'
cinema rating advisory if under 12s were
accompanied by an adult throughout the film, and if consumer advice about the content of
the film, for instance, 'Contains a single use of strong language and moderate violence' - was
available on publicity material and was included in local cinema listings. The Board then
carried out a national survey in May 2002 and got almost identical results with over 70% of
people supporting the introduction of '12A'.Once the Board was satisfied that the film
industry was including the Consumer Advice on publicity and that the cinema exhibitors
were including it in cinema listings, the new category was introduced on 30 August 2002.
Spider-Man had been passed '12' in April 2002, in spite of a request from the distributor for a
'PG'. The reason for the '12' was that the film contained a level of personal violence and a
revenge theme that went beyond what was acceptable under the 'PG' Guidelines. The
decision proved to be unpopular with the under 12s who had collected the merchandise, toys,
lunch-boxes etc, which were specifically marketed at young children. The BBFC received
many letters from disappointed children questioning the decision.
The distributor of Spider-Man, Sony Pictures, decided to re-release the film immediately
after the introduction of '12A' so that young fans had the chance to see the film at the cinema.
The decision to introduce '12A' had nothing to do with Spider-Man or the pressure from
parents and children who wanted to see the film. The Board had announced its decision to
consider changing the category in September 2000 because it recognised that children were
growing up faster and that parents were better placed to decide what their children should
watch. For the record, the first '12A' film was The Bourne Identity.
Much excitement and anticipation surrounded Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight based
both on the success of the previous film and the recent death of Australian actor Heath
Ledger. But though there has been much critical interest in Ledger’s final high profile
performance some quarters of the British press focussed on something quite different – the
film’s ‘12A’ certificate.
The Dark Knight was submitted with a '12A' request which came as no surprise given the
likely appeal of the film to younger audiences. It had also recently been awarded a ‘PG-13’,
(a near '12A' equivalent), by the American ratings organisation, the MPAA.
86

10. Several factors were noted which supported a ‘12A’ certificate. These included the film’s
comic book style, the appeal of the
work to 12 –15 year olds, the clear
fantasy context and the lack of
strong detail, blood or gore.
The BBFC was also careful to
ensure that additional advice was
available to parents and other
moviegoers through the bbfc.co.uk
website including extended
information about the film
detailing how and why it was
classified ‘12A’ and urging parents
to think carefully before taking
youngsters to see it.
Films classified '12A' are, broadly speaking, the most complained about decisions. As is
often the case such complaints about The Dark Knight focussed largely on the possibility of
very young children seeing the film – although many correspondents also cited what they
believed to be brutal, sadistic and strong violence. Several noted in particular the focus on
knife threat and violence perpetuated by the Joker character. Some complaints also linked the
content of the film to concerns about knife crime. Everyone who contacts the BBFC gets a
personal reply. But it is important to set the complaints in the context of the number of
people who saw the film. In the case of The Dark Knight the 200 plus complaints are a tiny
proportion of the five million people plus who saw it in the first two weeks after it opened.
The introduction of the 12A classification demonstrates that the BBFC have become more
careful with children's viewing, but the introduction of the R18 legalises forms of
pornography that were previously banned completely.
Q3. Prepare a 5 slide powerpoint explaining what you think of the 12A rating. What
are your opinions on the debate surrounding film classification in this country? Use
Spiderman and The Dark Knight as a starting point.Look at the example of Juno also
from 2008 (http://www.bbfc.co.uk/case-studies/juno-0) and the definition of 12 and 12A
ratings (http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/12a-and-12) Why is the rating so
important?
87

11. Marketing a Film
Making an audience aware - The Unique Selling Point
As with any product, the potential buyer (the audience) needs to know that a film is available
and is coming to their local cinema. Not only do they have to know about the film, they also
have to be persuaded to want to go and see it.
In starting to plan a marketing campaign for a
film, the distribution company has to decide
how it will present the film to the potential
audience -they will look for the 'unique selling
point' (USP). If, for example, a distributor is
handling a science fiction film, they will need to
look for the aspect of the film which sets it aside
from other science fiction films.
Normally, in deciding what theUSP of a film is,
the distributor will first of all look at the
storyline to see how this differs from other films
and what the key elements of the story are.This
is vitally important as the key storyline elements
will influence the way that the visual campaign -
posters, trailers etc. - is put together.
After this they will look at such things as stars,
special effects and director to see how these can
be incorporated within the campaign.Once the
USP of the film has been decided on, the
distributor will begin to develop the marketing
campaign and set their overall budget.
The budget spent on distributing a film is known as the Print and Advertising (P & A)
budget. The P & A comprises the cost of prints, advertising, publicity and promotions and is
set at around 40% of the estimated box-office income. The P & A budget is set by assessing
the potential box-office income of the film. The distributor will take into account the last
picture the star of the film has appeared in, which gives them an idea of the popularity of the
star. For example, in setting the P & A budget for a film starring George Clooney, the box
office of his last film will be used as a guide for the estimated box office of his next film.
Films which do not feature well-known stars could have greatly reduced box-office takings
and therefore a smaller amount will be estimated in the P & A budget.
However, some films defy this logic. Trainspotting (1996) was a case in point. It did not
feature any stars and yet the film managed to capture the public's imagination. The marketing
campaign, combined with the simultaneous release of the soundtrack and book, meant that
the film became a major box-office successattracting a wide audience in both the UK and the
US.
Even though a film may have big stars with vast amounts of money spent on marketing it,
there is no guarantee that the film will recoup the money invested. As William Goldman,
88

12. author of 'Adventures in the Screen Trade' said "in the film industry nobody knows
anything." In the end, it is up to the audience to decide whether a film is a success or not.
Very few films make a profit at the box office; this does not mean that they make a loss, but
that they make their money in pre-sales deals with television and DVD companies.
A marketing campaign is divided into three areas:
1. Advertising
2. Publicity
3. Promotions
The marketing campaign is also divided into above-the-line and below-the-line costs.
Above-the-line costs
Here, the above-the-line costs are for advertising. This is where the distributor pays a certain
amount of money to buy advertising space. They pay for a slot on television or radio, or buy
advertising space in newspapers or magazines, and know what they are getting for their
money. They know the size of the advert, when and where it will be placed and roughly how
many people are expected to see it.
Below-the-line costs
Publicity and promotions are below-the-line costs. Publicity is where money is spent on
bringing stars in from the United States for example. By doing so the distributor hopes to get
good coverage in the media, but it's not guaranteed. It's all about taking a risk and hoping the
gamble pays off. Promotions are set up with another company (e.g. a tie in with McDonald's)
to promote the film to a wider audience.
The trailer
The trailer often plays in the cinema around six weeks before the release of a film and
continues to play until the picture opens in the cinema. The trailer aims to raise audience
awareness of a film by logging the film title in their minds. It gives an overall impression of
the film to its potential audience, making sure that the audience is aware of the stars —
particularly where their names will help to sell the picture. It should create the desire to see
the film when it finally opens. Trailers tend to use a combination of footage from the film,
graphics and voice-over to generate curiosity.
'Teaser' trailers might also be used to whet the appetite of the audience in the same way as a
'teaser' poster. Lasting approximately 30 seconds, these are shorter than the main trailer and
play in the cinema for anything up to six months before a film opens. However, it is
important to understand that cinema advertising will only reach a cinema-going audience. It
is always important to make as many people as possible aware that a film is coming and so
other audiences must also be reached.
Media advertising
The distributor will want to buy advertising space in as many different media as is
appropriate both for the film and its P & A budget.The media normally available are
newspapers, magazines, televisionand radio. Internet websites are also set up to announce the
arrival of a film.The form of the advertising in each medium must tie in with the overall
campaign. Thus, newspaper advertising will be based on the campaign poster, whilst
89

13. television advertising will have elements of the cinema trailer in it.What is vital is that the
right media outlet is chosen for the film. Research will already have shown who the target
audience for a film is. It is up to the distributor to decide which would be the best
newspapers, magazines, slots on television and radio to select in order to reach that audience.
Extensive use is made of radio advertising on regional commercial radio stations. Radio is a
powerful medium, and reinforces the message of the poster and trailer, particularly if the film
has a strong soundtrack.Radio advertising is considerably cheaper than television, and is
usually used for mainstream films. Radio stations which target a particular audience, such as
a jazz station or a classical station, might be appropriate for the advertising of specialist
films. Adverts themselves consist of music from the film and narrative voice-over detailing
the cinema and release date.
Preview screenings
The general public are invited to a preview screening of the film in the hope that they will
enjoy it, and more importantly, that they will recommend it to friends. Following a preview
screening a questionnaire like the one opposite is handed out which the audience is expected
to complete in return for their free ticket to see the film.
These preview screenings, sometimes also called 'talker screenings', start the process of word
of mouth publicity, with audience members telling their friends and contacts about the film.
The completed questionnaire also provides the distributor with information about the
audience's enjoyment of the film, which will affect the way the film is sold to the public.
Publicity
Publicity involves gaining attention for the film in the media - newspapers, magazines,
television and radio - without paying for the space. Some distributors employ independent
companies who specialise in this area, known as PR companies, short for Public Relations.
Working in this area involves dealing with national and regional journalists, keeping them
informed about the film using the publicity tools outlined in the following pages.Although
the distributor will have to spend money on publicity, the amount of coverage that could be
gained will probably far outweigh in value the amount of money spent.
Using Film Festivals
PR strategies will vary hugely between
different films - the most important
thing is to make sure that the strategy
is appropriate for each particular film.
Film festivals can be a very effective
way of raising awareness of a film, but
they must be used carefully - for
example, there’s rarely any logic in
showcasing a film at the Toronto Film
Festival if you do not already have a
US distribution deal in place because
the PR impact achieved at Toronto
throughout North America will have
been dissipated by the time the film is
eventually released some months later.
90

14. Obviously, there are exceptions that prove the rule, films that have created a feeding frenzy
at Sundance or Toronto that are then nurtured and fully exploited by the winning distributor.
Cannes remains the most important international event, particularly for independent films,
although Venice and Berlin can be better platforms on occasion. Cannes is the most difficult
marketplace in which to create any noise because there are so many other films jostling for
press attention at the same time. At any festival, a priority is to give the press as many
chances as possible to see the film in order to stoke their interest and open up other
opportunities for interviews. It can often be advantageous to pre-screen films (on an
embargoed basis) prior to their Festival screenings to build up awareness and get the media
schedules partially filled up in advance of the Festival.
If there are stars attending the festival in support of the film, then clearly it is important that
the press are given access to them - but bear in mind that, in Cannes, there may be 5000
accredited media either chasing or needing persuading to conduct an interview. Somehow
their needs have to be satisfied within 10, 20 or, if you are lucky, 30 working hours from
each of a small number of stars, each of whom may be spending fewer than 3 days at the
Festival. PR Agencies spend a lot of time nurturing their relationships with the key media
representatives, so that they can increase the chances of winning their attention when it is
being stretched across so many competing priorities.
PR Budgets
Very often, PR is over-looked when producers are putting budgets together and, even if there
is an allowance made for this expense, it is usually too small. A typical budget for unit
publicity might be around £10 - £15,000 on a £3-5 million film. There also need to be
allowances for photography, Electronic press kits (EPKs) and media visits.
The Press Kit
Press kits are sent to journalists all over the country to give them information about
forthcoming films. They are one of the basic tools of any publicity department. Kits include
a set of authorised stills to be printed in newspapers and magazines, cast and crew credits,
production notes, biographies and filmographies of the stars, director and producer.EPKs are
also available to journalists working in television and contain many of the same items as the
written kits but with the addition of selected video clips and interviews for television. Audio
clips are also made available for radio.
Star Tours & Press Junkets
Touring a star of a film is a costly business, but one that usually pays dividends. Stars are
brought into the country at the distributor's expense, which means paying for flights, travel
(usually a chauffeur driven car), hotels, meals, a daily spending allowance and
entertainment.The distributor plans the tours down to the last hour, making good use of their
stars' time and carefully scheduling interviews to make sure that a spread of media are
covered, and that publications or television programmes with similar audiences do not clash.
Newspapers with a similar readership, and television programmes will want exclusivity of a
star.
For radio broadcasts, tapes of interviews are usually syndicated: for maximum publicity one
radio interview is recorded with a star or director and then sent to local radio stations on a
91

15. tape ready for immediate broadcast. As with the press and with television, interviews of this
kind provide good material for a radio show as well as 'free' publicity for the film.
Where stars are unable to travel, perhaps because of other filming commitments, a press
junket will be arranged. Selected journalists are taken, at the distributor's expense, to a
location convenient to the star for a round-the-table interview with them.
The Press Screening
Before a film is released, the press who are reviewing the film will be invited to a special
screening which will encourage the spread of word of mouth recommendations among the
media.
Gala premieres
For high profile films, the release might be preceded by a Royal or Charity Film Premiere.
These premieres are prestigious evenings where the stars, cast, crew and celebrity guests are
invited to a special screening of the film a few days in advance of its release. The media are
also invited to secure coverage of the event and increase public awareness of the film.
The benefit of a film premiere for the distributor is that this will usually gain a great deal of
media attention. It is very expensive to organise a premiere and it is only films
with larger marketing budgets that can afford to do this. A large cinema is hired and a post-
screening party is organised. We are all familiar with pictures in the newspaper or shots on
television of stars arriving at these events, usually in formal evening wear. The guests arrive
at the cinema in chauffeur driven cars, and members of the public often turn out to see the
arrival of these celebrities, all helping to make the premiere a "special occasion". These
events are not easily accessible to the public: tickets are extremely difficult to obtain, with
those that are sold raising money for a selected charity. The publicity gained for the film,
including newspaper editorials and news items is better than any advertising.
92

16. Screening programmes
To build on awareness for a film, screenings are organised prior to the release of the film in
conjunction with a media outlet which will appeal to the target audience. An example of this
would be the screening programmes organised through T4. These are free screenings with
tickets obtained by calling a hotline number advertised on the television screen.
Merchandise and Promotion Campaigns
Ever since the promotional campaign surrounding the release of Star Wars in 1977, movie
merchandise has become an important part of film marketing.The merchandising deals that
can be made from a potential 'blockbuster' are very lucrative, and in some cases can even
necessitate the setting up of a department which deals solely with merchandising produced
for the company's films. Merchandising has become a sophisticated, well-oiled department –
toys, clothes and gimmicks such as pencil cases and lunch boxes are now commonplace.
Promotions give added awareness to a film and help reinforce its title. They tend to take the
form of joint involvement with another party, known as the third party, who will gain from
their involvement with the film, for example, a tie in with Pizza Hut or McDonald's.
The BiggestSeller? Call it Word of mouth, call it buzz, call it chatter…
Research has proved that the key factor which will get audiences in to see a film is
something which cannot be bought - the personal recommendation of a friend or
acquaintance who has seen the film. It is word of mouth that really gets audiences into
cinemas. This explains why the opening weekend of a film's release is so important.
Whatever the advertising spend or however good the publicity - it is the audience's verdict
which will make or break a film.
Release Patterns
An important decision for the distributor is how many screens to open the movie on. This
depends largely on the results expected for the film but may also be influenced by the wish
to attract as big an audience in the first week as possible to help the film retain its screens for
subsequent weeks. (Conversely, a higher screen average from fewer screens can also help to
persuade exhibitors to keep a film in play even if its overall Box Office is not as high as
some competitors). The different types of release that might be considered are:
Approx. number of screens
inthe UK
Platform: 15
Limited: 150
Wide: 300
Saturation: 600+
93

17. There are basically three types of release in the UK:
Saturation
Click on the link to discover what films being released this week are being given what
coverage…(http://www.launchingfilms.com/release-schedule)
A film that literally saturates the country in terms of number of prints and national publicity, i.e.
The Lord Of The Ringsand The Hobbit series, the Harry Potter series, Spidermansequels,
Avengers Assemble and so on.
These are usually films backed by the major
Hollywood studios and will have had an extremely
large publicity and production budget behind them.
There will also be advertising tie-ins to high street
companies andmerchandising spin-offs such as
computer games, books, magazines and a TV
Making of ... documentary.The films will also have
almost as much publicity when they are released on
DVD .In terms of screenings, films like Avengers
Assemblewill be shown up to 12-15times a day at
most multiplexes even three or four weeks after
their release.
Posters will be on key billboard and bus shelters
sites, and recognisable images will usually feature
on magazine covers with saturation coverage
inside. In Empirefor example, each month the cover
and dozens of inside pages are given over to one
new blockbuster film in terms of articles, reviews,
interviews and adverts. For example, in
Empire'sJuly 1999 issue, over 50 % of the pages in the magazine featured articles, adverts and
interviews about Star Wars Episode III, The Phantom Menace
The number of prints for a saturation release can range from 600-800 and will screen at all the
major cinema chains (Odeon, UCI, UGC, Warner's), as well as high street commercial
independents such as City Screen sites, opening across the country on the same day. It is now
usual for the biggest films to have 1 or 2days of 'preview screenings' before the
Friday opening.
Wide release (Key Cities)
This is still a large release, but not on the same scale as the blockbusters. There will usually
be around 300 prints. These titles are also known as 'crossover' films, as they may also
screen at subsidised independent cinemas as well as multiplexes. The film may open in
London, gradually spreading across the country over the next few weeks.
Limited release (London only)
This is a small scale release, around 10-20 prints. Titles are usually known as 'art house' or
'specialised' films and will play in the Regional Film Theatres (RFTs), the National Film
Theatre in London and some City Screen sites. Films will tend to be foreign language titles,
94

18. re-released classics, small independent English language titles. Some films on a Platform
release may have as little as 4 or 5 prints, and if it's a film touring as part of a festival (i.e. The
London Film Festival on Tour), only one print may be available.
Costs
Cinemas will pay distributors a percentage of net box office, which is usually between 35-60
% but may be higher for some multiplex chains for franchises such as James Bond, Harry
Potter, The Lord of the Rings, etc. In the case of smaller cinemas that may get the film on a
second run or may screen a classic repertory title, the rental fee may be around 25-30 %.
Universal Pictures International claimed the crown as the UK's No. 1 distributor in 2008 on the
back of a slew of hits, the biggest of them Mamma Mia! which secured a whopping £67.9
million alone. UPI, Universal's overseas distribution arm, took £176.6 million for the year, an
18.5% market share. Sony’s best boxoffice showing was Quantum of Solace which bonded with
audiences to the tune of £50.7 million. January 13, 2009
Throughout the marketing campaign the distributor will be concerned about the effectiveness
of their pre-release film advertising and publicity. Private companies are employed to
conduct the audience research which can take a number of forms:
Audience tracking
At regular intervals leading up to the release of a film and during its first weeks of play, a
random selection of the public will be interviewed over the phone or on the street by a
research company. This is known as tracking. People are asked whether they have heard of
the film, whether they intend to see it or, if they have seen it, whether they enjoyed it. This
type of information can then be used by the distributors to assess the effectiveness of their
marketing campaign. If there are any serious problems, for example, the audience does not
know that the film is coming, then they can change the emphasis of the campaign.
After the Cinema Release…DVD Distribution Deals
Film distributors take an average of 75% of consumer
spend from retail DVD activity compared to about 25 -
33% from rental activity (hence their keenness to get titles
into the sell-through market as quickly as possible).
A billion DVDs have been sold in the U.K. since the format
launched less than a decade ago, according to the British
Video Association. The bestselling DVD ever in the U.K. is
Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring, which has sold
almost five million units. The two sequels -- The Two Towers
and Return of the King -- have also proved home hits,
coming in second and fourth respectively in the all-time DVD
sales chart. The DVD one billion mark was reached seven
years quicker than it took the same number of VHS units to
fly off shelves. (Variety June 2007)
Television Deals
Pay per View: the Pay TV service retains about 40 to 50% of the viewer's fee, recoups the
95

19. distributor's advance and pays any balance to the distributor. The distributor usually retains
around 25 to 35% in commission.
Subscription TV: The TV operator pays a fixed fee to the distributor (of £50k to £1.2m)
which usually depends on the film's performance at the Box Office.The distributor takes
between 25 and 35% commission with the balance to the producer / financier / agent.
Free TV: the fee paid by the broadcaster usually depends on the film's Box Office
performance. The distributor takes percentage fees of between 25 and 50% in the US and 20
- 40% in the Rest of the World, with the balance to the producers.
The Film Industry and DVDs
In 2002 the worldwide Home Entertainment business, encompassing video and DVD, was
worth $46 billion dollars globall, which made it as valuable as the entire music industry.
Some $15.9 billion (35%) of this total was accounted for by the international market
(including the UK), with the US accounting for the other $30 million. It is expected to grow
to $62 billion by 2006.
The key international markets for DVD the UK, Japan, France and Germany which between
them account for more than 60% of international revenues and reflects the higher penetration
of sales of DVD players in these territories: in the UK in 2003 44% of households have DVD
players (or other hardware that can play DVDs) and this is set to rise to 114% by 2006 - ie.
an average of more than one player per household.
The Home Entertainment business is now worth twice as much to the studios as their cinema
business although commercial success at the Box Office is still crucial to making money in
DVD sales.
The rental proportion of this market in 2002 was around 30% and this is expected to fall to
20% by 2006. The studios are keen to continue to support the rental business because it
brings them higher margins than retail, but it does appear now to be in decline. In the UK the
market is fragmented, with one major player (Blockbuster) generally dominating the large
number of smaller outlets but Blockbuster is in decline. The rental window is already
closing, with DVD releases happening nearer and nearer to the rental release date, and in an
increasing number of instances, the studios are going day and date with retail and rental.
The Home Entertainment market is expected to continue to achieve dramatic growth
over the next few years fuelled by the rise of VOD. Pressure on retail prices,
however, will mean that the total value of the business may eventually start to fall
even though sales volumes will still be growing.
Windows of exploitation will close over time in an effort to ward off the impact of
piracy and to improve cash flows to the studios.
By 2008, every household in the UK will have at least 1DVD player.
Good extra features are becoming increasingly important as a means of selling DVDs
and maintaining margins.
96

20. Issues for DVDs in the early 21st Century
Windows of Exploitation - In 2001, the average timetable for roll out of a film from
theatrical release to free television was around 30 months. In 2008, this has shrunk to as little
as 20 months. All other revenue opportunities have shrunk:
Video Rental - 2001: 6 months 2008: 4 months
Video Retail - 2001: 12 months 2008: 4-8 months
Pay per View - 2001: 18 months 2008: 7-12 months
Pay TV - 2001: 24 months 2008: 10-18 months
This change in pattern is partly to combat the effects of piracy which is proving to be a huge
problem in certain territories, but also to boost the studios' cash flow by reducing the amount
of time it takes for them to see revenues from further along the value chain.
‘Fast Burn’ Sales - 50% of new DVD sales are generated in the first month of release.
Getting the in-store point of sale materials and displays right is crucial to the studios if they
want to maximise sales of their top titles.
Release Days - Traditionally new videos and DVDs have been released on a Monday.
Distributors are now looking to move key releases to a Thursday or Friday to make best use
of their major marketing campaigns immediately before the heaviest buying days (50% of
DVD sales take place on Friday and Saturday).
Pricing - DVD retail prices are falling much faster than was the case with CDs. In the UK,
CD prices fell 13% in the first 6 years after their introduction; DVD prices have fallen by
19% in just three years. This is the result of some aggressive market by the majors who have
priced very aggressively to boost sales and consumer behaviour: research suggests that a
40% drop in retail price can lead to a 3,4 or 5 times lift in unit sales.To maintain their profits,
the studios will have to reduce their costs of sales by reducing the additional cost of
marketing DVDs by reducing the gap between cinema and DVD release - or develop more
premium priced products by improving the extras supplied on the disc.
DVD Extras - Extra features on DVDs are becoming increasingly important to differentiate
products in the market and to generate premium pricing. Reviews of DVDs often focus on
the extras and consumers are increasingly expecting them - research has shown that the
presence of good quality extras increases the consumer's intention to buy the disc. To ensure
top quality extras, it is essential to plan their content at the film's pre-production stage and
get endorsement for them from the producer and director of the film. Additional footage
might need to be shot on set or produced during post-production. Finished bonus material
needs to be delivered before the film's theatrical release so that it can be factored into the
DVD's release schedule.
Piracy - The MPAA estimates that piracy is currently running at 20% of the total DVD
market and is likely to get worse with the increased domestic take up of broadband. The
studios are considering technical solutions to help combat this problem but their main
weapon may be closing exploitation windows to reduce the time available for pirated copies
to circulate.
Marketing - Mobile Phone Campaigns -There are 290 million mobile phone users in Europe
- 100 million of whom are under 25. This makes text-based campaigns ideal for movies that
97

21. are aimed at the younger market.Online Campaigns- People spend approximately twice as
much time online each day as they do reading a newspaper. £7 billion of transactions are
carried out on the internet each year (excluding pornography) and DVDs are the most
popular item purchased online. Many DVD buyers do their research online even if they buy
through traditional outlets.
And in the future…
Digital Delivery – VOD
There is little doubt that at some
point in the future, all films will
be distributed and screened
digitally. The big question is
when this revolution will take
place. The digital roll-out will
involve a huge capital investment
and, although the benefits will be
enjoyed by both exhibitors and
distributors, it is not yet clear
who will pay for the necessary
investment. There are also still
issues to be resolved over
security - with piracy an increasing problem, the transmission mechanism for the digital
output will need to be 100% secure. The different methods of transmission available -
satellite, cable and data file - will have to be assessed against this criterion but also for their
ease of delivery and relative costs.
Day and Date Distribution
With the various exploitation windows closing, there is an increasing trend towards films
being released internationally on the same day as (or close to) their North American release.
This has the advantages of reducing the opportunities for piracy; enabling marketing
campaigns from the US to roll over into other territories; and allowing earlier exploitation of
other windows. On the other hand, day and date releasing requires more prints and means
that marketing spend must be committed internationally before the studio knows how the
film has played in the US. It also reduces the time that the distributors have for sorting out
dubbing, classification and other issues in each territory and makes it less likely that the
talent will be available to promote it in as many markets. In practice, decisions on release
pattern will continue to be taken on a film by film basis, with release dates generally moving
closer to the initial US release.
98

22. Case Study – The Marketing of Cloverfield (2008)
Constructed specifically as a 'monster movie for
the YouTube generation’, Cloverfield built a viral
marketing campaign - and its own audience -
through an enigmatic teaser-trailer, word of
mouth and a widget. Its innovative uses of an
alternative reality games and videocam
techniques involve audiences in new and
interactive ways.
With a very low production budget in Hollywood
terms (£15m), Cloverfield became an instant
financial success making £22 million in its
opening weekend. It is a recent example of the
power of viral marketing (sometimes called user-
generated marketing) to create audience interest
before a film's release and, most importantly, to
get people into the cinema.
Whether or not Cloverfield is a good film is up to
you to decide (critics are divided); but it stands as
a great example of the way modern marketers are using a range of methods to attempt to
reach their audience and sell a film.
The film's media language choice of an 'eye-witness' presentation of the story using a hand-
held camera acts as a representation of our current technological age. Cloverfield's marketing
also makes use of recent developments in technology and changes in audience activity and
behaviour to create and sustain interest. The director (Matt Reeves) called the film 'a
monster movie for the YouTube generation' indicating that the producers of this film were
specifically aware that their target audience were Internet-literate young people. It is these
people who have been the targets for the marketing campaign and have also been encouraged
to be a part of it.
The first glimpse – Teaser Trailer
The first anyone knew of the film was a teaser trailer shown before the 2007 summer
blockbuster Transformers. The trailer did not name the film and only gave a release date
after showing glimpses of an apparently home-made video of New York being attacked
bysomething, culminating in the shocking image of the head of the Statue of Liberty
crashing through a New York street. By creating memorable images and using an
unconventional method to present the events, the filmmakers were using a tried-andtested
marketing device, the creation of enigma mystery. Creating audience curiosity is a great way
to generate interest in a product. Those who saw the trailer would have been left wondering
what they had just seen: What genre was the film alluding to (Sci-Fi/Disaster/Monster)?
Why was the footage they had been shown more like their own home-movies rather than a
slick Hollywood production?
99

23. Target audience
The trailer's placement gives an indication of the target audience, one which is a difficult
market for advertisers at the moment: teens and, more specifically, young adults. These
groups are becoming hard to reach for advertisers who rely on conventional methods.
Young adults tend not to watch TV on a predictable, regular basis and often have access to
multi-channel cable television which fragments the audience across a range of channels.
Devices like Sky+ mean they can record television programmes, watch them when they
choose and fast-forward through any advertising. Alternative methods of viewing television
programmes also make this audience hard to find. 'On demand'. downloads and YouTube
split the audience further and this is the generation that is likely to wait to buy television
programmes and films on DVD rather than watch them in traditional settings surrounded by
advertising.
Alternative advertising methods were needed if Cloverfield was going to be able to attract
the attention of the group of people who could be used to help make the film a success in the
cinema. A specialised online and computer savvy audience was specifically targeted as their
interaction with the marketing was vital in the film generating interest from another valuable
audience group, the mainstream movie-goer. The story of Cloverfield's marketing shows
how the online audience was used to create a buzz about the film to support a more
traditional marketing campaign.
Building the campaign
The teaser trailer provided one piece of important information, the name of the producer JJ
Abrams. This would have created a number of genre expectations. Abrams is the creator of
Alias and Lost and so the audience could expect an element of Sci-Fi/Horror within this film
and might anticipate a narrative that was complex, fragmented and laden with 'clues' rather
than explanations. Web searches after the teaser trailer led the audience to a website named
only as the date of the film's release (www.1-08-08.com). This site slowly released photos
which were time and date stamped to allow the audience to build up chronological glimpses
into the narrative of the film.
100

24. Building ‘buzz’ and ‘chatter’ on the Net
The enigma and the slow release of information were both constructed to encourage
discussion online in blogs, social networks and chat rooms, which was how the real
marketing took place via 'word of mouth. Web-chatter was heightened on the release of a
poster showing a decapitated Statue of Liberty, a devastated New York and the release of a
second, more detailed trailer. Still maintaining the mystery, the trailer's exposition contained
a chilling geographical marker identifying the location of events to be in the 'area formally
known as Central Park'. For the first time the film's title was identified and the trailer was
released online along with an official movie website (www.cloverfieldmovie.com) which
eventually provided links to MySpace and Facebook pages 'created' by some of the
characters from the film. These regularly updated pages created a real-time story which
showed the characters moving towards the eventful night and provided a back-story to the
film itself. The MySpace blog was where the film's protagonist announced he was moving to
Japan to take a new job at Slusho!, a Japanese soft drinks company, which explains why the
film begins with a going away party.
In addition a widget was available for download from the website. This piece of software
could be attached to MySpace pages, blogs etc. and contained the first five minutes of the
film with an introduction by JJ Abrams. To download and use the widget people needed to
register their contact details.
This registration immediately entered people into a competition based on who managed to
distribute the widget to the most people; a direct encouragement of more 'word of mouth'
marketing.
They did the traditional stuff too…
Adverts were also sent to mobile phones, traditional posters and TV slots were also used and
the culmination of all these events was an increasing public and mainstream press awareness
of the film. The campaign was creating a deep curiosity as so much information had been
held back and the only way for the audience to gain answers to the questions the marketing
raised was to go to the cinema to see the film. As the character Hud said in the second trailer,
101

25. with this much interest it was almost inevitable that people are gonna want to know how it
all went down.
But that's not all...
Parallel to this campaign, a related story was
being told through an ARG. The ARG
centred around a fictional Japanese company
called Tagruato and its subsidiary Slusho!
and only a few direct connections were
made to the Cloverfield plot. Home pages
for Slusho! andTagruato were put online.
The former ran a competition for audience
members to create adverts for the frozen soft
drink whose USP was its addictive nature
('You can't drink just six') and the happiness
it would bring its consumer. (Remember,
Slusho! was the company the character Rob from the film was taking a job
with.)http://www.slusho.jp/
Vocab - ARG — alternative reality game
A set of interlinked sources, mostly websites, along with voicemails, scavenger
hunts and even novels, which shed light on a hidden story. ARGs challenge
players to make connections and solve puzzles to piece together a 'distributed
narrative'
Tagruato's corporate homepage looks like a conventional business website — even down to
experiencing hacks by 'eco-terrorists' It appeared that Slusho's key ingredient, 'seabed nectar',
might not be entirely safe. The site reported that a drilling rig in the Atlantic Ocean had been
mysteriously destroyed.'TV reports' based on mobile phone footage showed huge chunks of
debris being hurled from the sinking rig although there was no explanation for this
phenomenon. Pictures from the scene were added to www.1-01-08.com.
There's more...
A Manhattan couple Jamie
and Teddy set up a website
to post video-blogs to stay
in touch after Teddy had
gone to Japan to work for
Tagruato. Jamie assumed
she had been dumped as
she hadn't heard from
Teddy for over a month
when she received a
package containing a
Tagurato baseball cap,
something wrapped in tin-
foil (which she was
instructed not to eat) and a
recorded message indicating Teddy was in some sort of trouble. Interpreting this as a sick
102

26. practical joke, she assumed he had a new skanky girlfriend and decided to eat the gooey
product she received. Almost immediately she appears to become extremely intoxicated.
Jamie makes a brief appearance in Cloverfield where the audience can glimpse her passed
out on the sofa at Rob's leaving do in the opening scene of the film.
Marketing + movie = more mystery
The addition of a number of back stories to the Cloverfield tale, without giving clear ideas of
'cause and effect' encourages the audience to attempt to build a story for themselves; first of
all to attempt to make sense of the promotional material and, after watching the film, to
supplement the limited information provided by the film's highly restricted narration.
The marketing has created a'Cloverfield universe' bigger than the events of the 90-minute
film, but has held back on providing enough information to give resolution to all the
mysteries. The film's story is told from the point of view of people who (just like the target
audience) have very little information as to what is occurring around them; the characters
just catch snippets of information in news reports and in conversations with the military (just
like the audience).
The viral marketing, the ARG and then the video-cam style presentation all enhance
audience identification with the characters and this heightens the shocking nature of the
events we witness with them in the film. The desire to make sense of the events unfolding
within the film has been played on for both the interactive and mainstream audience but the
filmmakers are still holding back vital pieces of information: What does Slusho! have to do
with all of this? Where did the monster come from? Do the military manage to destroy the
monster? Do any of the characters from the film survive?
Cloverfield 2?
Could the actual film Cloverfield be just another element in a complex marketing campaign?
Is the film an expensive advert for yet another product still to be made? There are online
rumours already about a Cloverfield 2 with theories ranging from the sequel being told from
another victim's perspective (plenty of people can be seen filming events in the film) or from
a military or reporter's point of view. Maybe Cloverfield 2 will be a standard blockbuster
movie with omniscient narration and a solid resolution. At this point the 'truth' is irrelevant.
What is important is that people are talking about a potential second film and so the viral
campaign has already begun.
Q4. Why do you think Cloverfield was such a successful movie? In your opinion what
was particularly attractive about its marketing campaign. Go to the websites listed in
the case study to see if they’re still live.Film likes Wedding Video, Paranormal Activity
and End of Watch have used the ‘found-footage’ format more recently? How have they
been marketed? Do you think this format is beginning to become ‘tired’?
103

27. Film and the Audience of Tomorrow
Danah Boyd Cannes Film Festival Opening Speech - May 16th 2007
Introduction
Film has gone digital. The digitization of film takes place at multiple levels, but most
noticeably: production, distribution and consumption.
1. Production: What cameras you use, how you do lighting, special effects, storage of
content, editing of content, etc.
2. Distribution: Advertising your film, DVD culture, download culture.
3. Consumption: remix, sharing, clipping culture.
At each of these three levels, there are stages to how technology affects practice.
The first stage is TRANSLATION. Old practices are kept intact and imported into the
new medium. Many of you are familiar with this - your cameras went digital but they still
looked and acted like cameras... for the most part.
The second stage is LOCALIZATION. People realize that there are much more effective
and efficient ways of utilizing the technology to reach a desired end goal. Practices are
modified to take advantage of the technology, usually to make things more efficient. At the
same time, these practices feel quite similar to the translated ones. Tickets for films can be
bought online and printed. People can sign up to be notified by email when a film is released.
The third stage is CO-OPTION. This is the stage when new practices emerge that are
completely incomprehensible to those who were fluent in the previous culture of film. You
can see this in visual effects where things like CGI were impossible without digitization, but
more radical practices have to do with how viewers consume, share, and mess with film.
Think REMIX. It is easy to be terrified of co-option because much of what emerges seems
to go against what was typical before.
Conclusions – the future of Digital Rights Management (DRM)
Film is not disappearing, but the Internet is here to stay. It's easy to play ostrich and pretend
nothing is changing, but the fact is that the Internet is changing many things includingthe
filmaudience. When we talk about how how audiences have changed these are four key areas
that help define them:
1. They are Persistent.
2. They expect searchability
3. They expect replicability
4. They are invisible
Film can always be turned into video, regardless of what DRM you choose to use. Sure,
DRM makes it harder, but when there's a will, there's always a way and you lose your
viewers trust in the process if you choose to make their lives more difficult. As we saw a few
weeks ago with the HD-DVD hack, once information is out there, there's no bringing it back.
Once it's digital, it can be copied and reformatted to make searching difficult. It's much faster
104

28. to copy than it is to clean up copies, for better and for worse. DRM will never protect film
but it will alienate consumers. DRM does slow the flow of content, which can benefit big
blockbusters but makes independent film even more obscure. For example, there's no point
in crippling a trailer with flash DRM. Trailers are advertisements. Put it up on YouTube,
Revver, MySpace, everywhere you can think of... provide the code for people to copy/paste
your trailer into their blogs and MySpaces. If people like it and want to pass it on, encourage
them! Copy/paste! The more people who hear about your film, the better.
I bring up DRM because as we think of the audiences of tomorrow, we need to think of ways
to engage them, not alienate and control them. There's a lot of creativity in this room. Why
put it into trying to maintain status quo rather than taking things to the next level?
By and large, we treat the Internet as another broadcast medium where you push content at
people. In other words, we're still aiming to localize rather than to co-opt. A better way of
conceiving it is as a public space where people want to pull content in to personalize it,
identify with it, and share it. It is no secret that we're not yet sure how to monetize this
practice, but efforts to stop it are like trying to build gigantic walls after planes were
invented.
The audience of tomorrow is online. They're consuming video; they want to be
consuming film. There's unbelievable room for innovation and creativity in this space. The
technology is not stable and it never will be stable. Successful filmmakers will need to pay
attention to the dynamics and optimize their strategies accordingly. We all know that agility
in the presence of challenges results in good art.
So, in conclusion, here are four things to remember:
Youth are online to hang out with friends... they use media to jockey for status and
socialize with their peers.
Youth do not and will not consume media whole in a passive way..the more they are
able, the deeper they were engage. This means remix, chopping it and sharing it.
Building walls to stop deep engagement scares off fans and never actually closes the
loophole.
It is time for the film industry to innovate rather than trying to control. Many new
opportunities lie ahead.
Q5. To what extent do you agree with the statement that the audience of tomorrow is
online? What examples from your own consumption of films and media lead you
towards the internet? Write a paragraph answering each of these questions.
105