Imaging allows a non-invasive assessment of biochemical and biological processes in a living subject. Monitoring, assessing, and characterising novel therapeutics in pre-clinical models is an essential part of drug development.
In this webinar Dr Juliana Maynard, Lead Scientist in Pre-clinical Imaging, and Dr Philippa Hart, Lead Scientist in Mass Spectrometry Imaging, explore available imaging technologies and techniques and explain how they can help at different stages of the drug development process.
Selecting the right drugs for the right patients, using biomarkers to stratify this and improve predictability of drug response.
Next I will introduce the technologies and show some selected examples before going into multi-modality.
Looking at samples on different scales is one reason ofor implementing multiple imaging techniques. However as you may know, there is a wealth of other information to be gained.
As discussed each of the modalities offer a unique offering – PET and NIR imaging are frequently used to measure and assess compound distribution and accumulation – PET is a functional imaging technique radiolabelled distribution studies can be performed either using direct labelling or indirect approaches – they can be used to assess the distribution of the candidate compounds longitudinally – especially with larger molecules and biologics where there are limited ways to gain quantititvate assessment of distribution – PET is a very sensitive methods and can be done in 3D
Looking at samples on different scales is one reason for implementing multiple imaging techniques. However as you may know, there is a wealth of other information to be gained. In general, the following ex-vivo techniques can be used for assessing biological activity, and toxicity (biomarkers), and in some cases for looking at drug distribution and evidence or target engagement or target validation.
In this particular case these images were generated by Ekta from FFPE tissue where paraffin removal, antigen retrieval and on-tissue, in-situ digestion was carried out. Generally we find fresh frozen tissue to be best due to the harsh treatment required to handle fFPE tissues.
For model characterisation, for drug distribution, for biomarker analysis
For model characterisation, for drug distribution, for biomarker analysis. This work is ongoing and workflows will be applied to other organoid and spheroid models for drug distribution and monitoring of biomarkers for biological activity, evidence of efficacy, toxicity etc.
When increasing the resolution we see that there are many more receptors present in the cell membrane than there appears to be in the lower res images. This allows for better measurement of distance between molecules and for precise imaging of defined structures, such as mitochondria. This is intended to be implemented for target validation and engagement studies.
Looking at samples on different scales is one reason ofor implementing multiple imaging techniques. However as you may know, there is a wealth of other information to be gained.
Can track cells in-vivo, mainly immune, t-cells, b-cells, macrophages. New and noevl ways of labelling them where we don’t currently have any way of doing so at the moment (easily, in-vivo).
We are also looking to further this by taking a similar but unlabelled approach with MSI
In addition to the humanised approach we are aiming for with the organoid and spheroid models in-vitro (mentioned previously), there are a number of ways that we can use preclinical imaging to humanise the drug discovery approach. Using orthotopic models in addition to subcutaneous models
Summary: there are a variety of different approaches that can be used for in-vivo, ex-vivo and in-vitro imaging.