RUNNING HEAD: Christian Worldview 6 Christian Worldview and Operations Management Name Course Date Christian Worldview and Operations Management Biblical or Christian world view is the way of life that is based on the teachings and preaching of Bible. If a person considers teachings of Bible as the standard to be followed in life and he tends to decide what to do or say according to them, then he is apparently following Biblical worldview. God selected to let those rules oversee God's creation, moderately than God requiring altering the course of those heavenly laws. Accordingly, wonders do not occur and God is "Wholly Other", comprehensive superior from mortality, with unconditionally no nearness among persons. One conceivable logical importance of deism is that since God doesn't have to be complicated in humanoid businesses, then we actually don't essential God at all. Disbelief can quickly be acceptable from a technical, logical and even intelligently religious viewpoint. Another offshoot of modernization is fundamentalism, which first increased importance in the early 20th century. On the outward, while deism and fundamentalism seem to be conflicting excesses, they portion many conventions. Most apparent is the ethical and psychic potentials originate within humanity that reflects the personality of God. The foundations of Christian theology are expressed in ecumenical creeds. These professions of faith state that Jesus grieved, expired, were suppressed, and were resuscitated from the dead in order to grant everlasting life to those who have faith in in him and faith in him for the reduction of their immoralities. The faiths further uphold that Jesus physically rose into paradise, where he reigns with God the Father. Most Christian coinages teach that Jesus will return to judge everybody, living and dead, and to grant eternal life to his supporters. He is reflected the model of a righteous life. His ministry, execution, and renaissance are often mentioned to as the "gospel", meaning "good news”. Biblical View influences me when I try resolving ethical dilemmas which I confront in my personal or professional life. I try to define my moral values according to the basics elucidated in Bible. This leads me support and feeling that I am doing the right thing. I do not follow practical ethical values in resolving ethical dilemmas because they are mostly derived from convenience and ease of application rather than following the right path. Bible influences me to a great extent for knowing between the right and wrong and also between the two rights and thus I always arrive at a best possible solution. The Macdonald’s case Strict liability allows the injured party to seek reimbursement from whoever was accountable for the product being faulty. Contrasting negligence, the injured individual does not need to determine who precisely failed to do ...

1. RUNNING HEAD: Christian Worldview
6
Christian Worldview and Operations Management
Name
Course
Date
Christian Worldview and Operations Management
Biblical or Christian world view is the way of life that is based
on the teachings and preaching of Bible. If a person considers
teachings of Bible as the standard to be followed in life and he

2. tends to decide what to do or say according to them, then he is
apparently following Biblical worldview. God selected to let
those rules oversee God's creation, moderately than God
requiring altering the course of those heavenly laws.
Accordingly, wonders do not occur and God is "Wholly Other",
comprehensive superior from mortality, with unconditionally no
nearness among persons. One conceivable logical importance of
deism is that since God doesn't have to be complicated in
humanoid businesses, then we actually don't essential God at
all. Disbelief can quickly be acceptable from a technical, logical
and even intelligently religious viewpoint.
Another offshoot of modernization is fundamentalism, which
first increased importance in the early 20th century. On the
outward, while deism and fundamentalism seem to be
conflicting excesses, they portion many conventions. Most
apparent is the ethical and psychic potentials originate within
humanity that reflects the personality of God.
The foundations of Christian theology are expressed in
ecumenical creeds. These professions of faith state that Jesus
grieved, expired, were suppressed, and were resuscitated from
the dead in order to grant everlasting life to those who have
faith in in him and faith in him for the reduction of their
immoralities.
The faiths further uphold that Jesus physically rose into
paradise, where he reigns with God the Father. Most Christian
coinages teach that Jesus will return to judge everybody, living
and dead, and to grant eternal life to his supporters. He is
reflected the model of a righteous life. His ministry, execution,
and renaissance are often mentioned to as the "gospel", meaning
"good news”.
Biblical View influences me when I try resolving ethical

3. dilemmas which I confront in my personal or professional life. I
try to define my moral values according to the basics elucidated
in Bible.
This leads me support and feeling that I am doing the right
thing. I do not follow practical ethical values in resolving
ethical dilemmas because they are mostly derived from
convenience and ease of application rather than following the
right path. Bible influences me to a great extent for knowing
between the right and wrong and also between the two rights
and thus I always arrive at a best possible solution.
The Macdonald’s case
Strict liability allows the injured party to seek reimbursement
from whoever was accountable for the product being faulty.
Contrasting negligence, the injured individual does not need to
determine who precisely failed to do their responsibility. But
the only circumstance is that the merchandise must be defective
and irrationally unsafe which is not the case here since the
coffee was mentioned to be hot. Negligence is the only way to
win this case because basis it will require to find the person or
party who was really accountable for the product being faulty
which can be made clear after comprehensive examination and
hence manufacturer of the jar can be found to be negligent.
Also, Efforts to limit warranties don’t matter on a negligence
entitlement.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the locus
of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of
choosing one action/policy over other actions/policies. As such,
it moves beyond the scope of one's own interests and takes into
account the interests of others.
Act-utilitarianism –This principle is applicable directly to the
all the alternatives in the situation to be analyzed. The rationale

4. of right or wrong is justified based on the act which brings out
the best results. The right act is then defined as the one which
brings about the best results.
Rule-utilitarianism – This principle is applicable to justify the
validity of rules of conduct or the moral principles prevalent in
the society. These rules are defined by society and established
going by the ultimate consequences I brought to all the
stakeholders. For example keeping a promise is right and
breaking it is wrong.
These two kinds of applications pertain to a very methodical
approach which clearly lays out the steps of evaluating the
various alternatives of an ethical resolution. The crux of the
theory is that the person applying utilitarian approach needs to
make sure that the decision he makes brings maximum good to
maximum people related to that problem. This approach
however misses out a point of being ethical. The main objective
is to basically “do the right thing” according to the basic
virtues. A right thing is right no matter what the outcomes are.
For example: telling truth is a right thing even if hurts or
distresses all the people related to it. Lying to them might bring
more happiness to them and lead to greater good but the fact is
that it is wrong to tell a lie and thus utility of the act cannot be
the basis of any act that tries to be ethical.
The Advancement Moral
Kant’s theory is a case of a moral philosophy according which
the appropriateness or wrongness of activities is not contingent
on their penalties but on whether they achieve responsibility.
Some kinds of activities (comprising homicide, robbery, and
deceit) are unconditionally banned, even in circumstances where
the act would fetch about extra pleasure than the substitute. For
Kantians, there are two queries that a person needs to ask
himself is he chooses to act: (i) Will I want others to act in a
similar way? If the response is no, then he should not execute

5. the deed. (ii) Does my act respect the goals of anthropological
existences rather than just expending them for my individual
drives? Yet again, if the response is no, then he should not go
for it (Martin, 1970).
For Example: According to the Kantian Analysis, the acts of
selective disclosure of the information about an organisation or
a person might feel right from a privacy perspective but there in
a fine line between what is private and what needs to be
publicly disclosed. A person cannot just choose to post all
positive information about himself or his company on an
official source. Though websites like Facebook and other social
networking websites can allow users to post only favorable
content but this norm cannot be followed when a person or an
organisation presents itself at an official source. Thus, the right
to internet privacy can only be exercised when it does not
mislead people or society and does not hamper their interests.
Concept of ethics and business operations
Business operations can be carried out in the following manner
keeping ethics in mind:
1. Be Authentic: leaders should reflect themselves as the way
they are in real life and try not to pose themselves as larger than
life creatures because subordinates tend to learn and emulate
their leaders who are real and make mistakes as real human
beings (Nish, 2005).
2. Listen: it is incredibly important for any leader to really
listen to others in order to make people follow them when they
are speaking. This attribute makes people around them feel
valued and thus in return they command respect from them.
Also, good listeners do not miss details and come across as
flawless managers. This is particularly important when the
subordinate comes up with a morally confusing situation (Nish,
2005).
3. Measure: The intensity of the moral dilemma should be very
clear in the mind of the leader or a manager so that he can
weigh in the problems and consequences that will result from

6. the ethical dilemma. There is a need to analyze the delicate
balance between over-reacting and underreacting in order to
resolve the problem amicably. This will lead the leader to
undertake a comprehensive analysis to frame a very well
defined approach to resolve the conflict (Harrington, 2007).
4. Define morals: True managers and leaders are the one who
have a clear and very focused approach towards defining the
morals and ethics. They do not compromise on these morals
once they know what they stand for. This aspect is important for
a person to know when he faces an ethical dilemma and what he
needs to do (Harrington, 2007)..
5. Take a Stand: leaders should never be afraid to speak their
mind out as it is one thing to be diplomatic but other to be
reluctant to express the views. Also, it is advisable to take stand
in the scenarios involving ethical and contentious issues so that
the followers know what you think and try to associate you with
a particular ideology (Nish, 2005).
References
Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Products Liability:
Protection for the "Innocent" Seller in Texas". The National
Law
Kammer & Haag, S.C (2013), Injury Attorney,
http://www.yourwisconsininjurylawyers.com/library/products-
liability-legal-theories.cfm
Overview of product liability and product liability defenses,
(2013), Lawyer Locator,
http://www.lawyerlocator.co.uk/lawyer/legal_issues/get_article/
id/224/overview-of-product-liability-and-product-liability-
defences/
Product liability and safety law, (2012), Department for
business, innovation and skills

7. Williams, Bernard (1993). "esp. Chapter 10, Utilitarianism".
Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge University
Press
Silverstein, Harry S. A (1972), Defence of Cornman’s
Utilitarian Kantian Principle, Philosophical Studies
Martin, Michael, (1970) A Utilitarian Kantian Principle,"
Philosophical Studies, (with H. Ruf), 21, 1970, pp. 90–91