Hydraulics

1. HYDRAULICS OF MINE DEWATERING WELLS: A REPORT
S. Ansah, K. S. Animuonyam, A. A. Ansah, M. Antwi, O. Agyemang, O. R. Opoku, L. P. Amankwaa, C. Tombawo,
K. W. Pinkrah, E. Buadi, J. B. Serwaa
University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
INTRODUCTION
Dewatering is essential for the safe and efficient operation of quarries and open pit mines that
extend below groundwater level. Benefits of dewatering include better working conditions and
greater efficiency of mining operations, as well as improved geotechnical stability, for example
by allowing steeper side slopes. Dewatering techniques can be divided into two main groups
(which may be used in combination). The first group is pumping methods, where water is
pumped from arrays of wells or sumps and piped away for disposal. Pumping methods include:
in-pit pumping; pumping from wells; sub-horizontal wells and drains; wellpoints and ejector
wells; and drainage adits and tunnels. The second group of techniques is exclusion methods,
where low permeability walls or barriers are used to reduce groundwater inflows into the pit.
Exclusion methods include: bentonite slurry walls; grout curtains; and artificial ground freezing.
Dewatering operations in quarries and surface mines may appear straightforward in theory. When
excavation extends below the groundwater level, water will naturally flow into the pit through
permeable strata or geological features like fissures and fractures. This influx of groundwater can
disrupt mining activities, leading to reduced operational efficiency or even more severe
consequences such as flooding and instability of pit slopes. Consequently, effective groundwater
control measures, commonly referred to as 'dewatering,' are necessary to ensure safe and dry
working conditions during mining operations. However, in practice, dewatering can become a
more intricate process. In addition to the practical challenges of economically removing or
excluding groundwater from the pit, it is crucial to consider the potential environmental impacts
associated with dewatering activities. This paper aims to provide an overview of the
fundamentals of dewatering in surface mines and also the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells.

2. GROUNDWATER CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE MINING
Surface mining operations implement groundwater control measures for practical reasons and
economic benefits. These measures are primarily aimed at improving mining efficiency and
enabling operations to continue in areas where groundwater inflows and pressures would
otherwise inundate or destabilize the mine. It is important to consider both visible groundwater
inflows and the less apparent groundwater pressures within the pit slopes and floors, as these
pressures can significantly impact stability in certain hydrogeological conditions. The specific
objectives of a dewatering program will vary based on factors such as the mine type, geological
characteristics (e.g., hard rock, soft rock, sand and gravel), presence of unstable overburden,
mine size and depth, and working methods (e.g., equipment used and blasting techniques).
Nonetheless, the overarching goals of mine dewatering can be simplified into a few fundamental
principles.
Efficient mine dewatering should meet certain criteria:
• It should be cost-effective.
• It must operate within the required timeframes.
• It should not unnecessarily disrupt mining activities.
• It should adhere to relevant environmental regulations and avoid causing unacceptable
environmental impacts.
Typically, the purpose of dewatering in mining operations is to provide various benefits,
including:
• Improved geotechnical slope stability and safety: By reducing groundwater levels and pore
water pressures through depressurization, dewatering enables the use of steeper slope angles in
pit walls and mitigates the risk of base heave in the presence of confined aquifers.
• Enhanced working conditions: Dewatering facilitates better mobility and diggability within the
mine, minimizing downtime caused by pit flooding.
• Cost savings in blasting operations: Lowering groundwater levels prior to mining activities
results in dry blast holes, reducing the need for more expensive emulsion explosives.

3. • Decreased haulage costs: Dewatering rock materials reduces their moisture content, resulting in
lighter loads for transportation, thus reducing haulage expenses.
• Reduced environmental impacts: Targeted dewatering through wells can selectively pump
water from specific geological layers, while cut-off walls can prevent groundwater from
accessing crucial layers. This approach utilizes aquitards and low permeability layers to
minimize drawdown effects on shallow groundwater-dependent ecosystems such as wetlands.
In summary, effective mine dewatering should offer cost-effectiveness, meet necessary timelines,
avoid unnecessary disruptions, comply with environmental regulations, and provide a range of
benefits to mining operations, including improved stability, efficiency, cost savings, and reduced
environmental impacts.
For this writing, we would be focusing more on the removal of underground water by pumping
methods or wells, also known as in-pit pumping, more particularly on the hydraulics associated
with it.
FUNDAMENTALS OF THE HYDRAULICS OF MINE DEWATERING WELLS (IN-PIT
PUMPING)
The primary method of groundwater control through pumping in surface mines is known as in-
pit pumping. This approach involves utilizing the open pit itself as a reservoir, allowing
groundwater to naturally flow into the pit through permeable strata or fissures. Within the pit, the
water is collected in open drains or channels and directed to low points or sumps, from where it
is pumped out to the surface. In addition to groundwater, the in-pit pumping system also handles
surface water that accumulates within the pit. The water collected at the sumps and pumps
typically contains suspended solids as it has traveled over the pit floor and drainage channels.
Therefore, in-pit pumps are designed to handle "dirty" water with some suspended solids, and the
pumped water often requires treatment to remove solids before discharge from the site.
In-pit pumping is most suitable for stable rock formations where the inflow of groundwater is
unlikely to cause instability in the pit slopes and base. However, in areas with unstable rock or
granular deposits like sand or sand and gravel, the seepage of groundwater through such
materials can lead to instability issues. It's important to note that in-pit pumping indirectly
depressurizes the pit slopes, and high pore water pressures may persist in the slopes even after

4. the main pit is dewatered, draining slowly into the pit. This poses a risk of geotechnical slope
instability.
Depending on the size and shape of the pit, different approaches may be taken. In some cases,
the pit can be kept almost entirely dry, with standing water confined to small sump areas. In
other instances, the bottom of the pit may be allowed to flood and form a fluctuating pond or
lagoon, influenced by varying rates of groundwater and surface water inflow. In such cases, the
in-pit pumps may be mounted on floating pontoons to accommodate the changing water levels.
When in-pit pumping alone is insufficient to ensure stability, perimeter dewatering wells may be
employed. These wells are typically located outside the crest of the pit and extend below the base
of the pit. They are pumped using specialized slimline borehole electrical submersible pumps.
Perimeter dewatering wells offer two main advantages over in-pit pumping. Firstly, if the wells
are activated well in advance of pit sinking, they can intercept lateral groundwater flow into the
pit, allowing groundwater levels to be lowered before mining begins, thus improving operational
conditions. Secondly, by being situated behind the pit slopes in favorable geological settings,
these wells can effectively depressurize groundwater within the pit slopes. In some cases,
perimeter dewatering wells may be combined with in-pit wells, although the presence of such
wells and associated infrastructure within the pit may impact mining methods and sequencing.
Perimeter dewatering wells are typically located behind pit slopes and, under favorable
hydrogeological conditions with significant hydraulic continuity, can effectively depressurize the
slopes. However, if the strata penetrated by these wells contain low permeability faults or layers,
perimeter dewatering wells alone may not sufficiently depressurize the slopes to ensure stability.
In such cases, an additional option is to install sub-horizontal drains extending from the pit
slopes. These drains create permeable pathways for water to enter the pit and can be drilled
horizontally or with a slight inclination from the pit benches. The drains are passive and not
directly pumped. Water pressure in the slopes drives water along the drain, which is then
collected in drainage trenches and pumped away. The installation of these drains must be
coordinated with the mining sequence as they can only be installed from within the pit. Initially,
the drains may exhibit significant flow, but as the pit slopes are depressurized, the flow will
decrease, and drains in upper pit slopes may eventually dry up.

5. In cases where pit slopes contain zones of low permeability materials, widely spaced perimeter
wells may have limited effectiveness due to their limited influence zone. Specialized pumping
methods using closely spaced lines of small diameter wells can be employed. Two commonly
used methods are wellpoint dewatering, where wells are pumped by suction pumps, and ejector
dewatering, where wells are pumped using an ejector system based on the nozzle and venturi
principle. These methods, widely used in the construction industry for sands, gravels, and
superficial deposits, are occasionally applied to the side slopes of surface mines and quarries.
The effectiveness of groundwater lowering achieved by such systems is limited by the pumping
method, and multiple lines of wells may be necessary at different levels within the pit slopes.
Another dewatering technique, albeit less frequently used, is the construction of drainage
galleries or adits. This involves constructing a tunnel behind a pit slope or beneath the pit bottom
to drain and depressurize specific areas of the mine. The efficiency of this method is enhanced
when the topography allows for the construction of a tunnel portal at a lower elevation than the
final pit bottom or the desired slope depressurization level. In such cases, the gallery acts as a
passive drain with water flowing by gravity from the tunnel portal. The drained zone directly
affected by the tunnel can be expanded by drilling angled drain holes from the tunnel. While
drainage galleries or adits can be specifically constructed for drainage purposes, some mines
identify existing tunnels originally built for access or exploration as having significant drainage
effects and subsequently incorporate them into their mine depressurization programs.
Figure 1. Schematic arrangement of in-pit pumping for a surface mine

6. Figure 2. Schematic arrangement of in-pit pumping and perimeter dewatering wells for a surface
mine (top) and the cut-away view (bottom)

7. Figure 3. Schematic arrangement of in-pit pumping, perimeter dewatering wells and sub-
horizontal slope drains for surface mine ( cut-away view)
Figure 4. Schematic arrangement of a wellpoint pumping system used for localized slope
dewatering in surface mine

8. Figure 5. Schematic arrangement of a drainage gallery used for dewatering of surface mine
DARCY’S LAW AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE HYDRAULICS OF MINE
DEWATERING WELLS
Darcy's law, a fundamental concept in groundwater flow, is of great significance in
understanding the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells. It provides a mathematical relationship
that describes the movement of groundwater through porous media, which is essential for
efficient dewatering operations in mines.
Darcy's law states that the rate of groundwater flow (Q) through a porous medium is directly
proportional to the hydraulic gradient (dh/dL), which represents the change in hydraulic head (h)
per unit distance (L) in the direction of flow. Mathematically, it can be expressed as:
Q = -K * A * (dh/dL)
Here's what these terms mean in the context of mine dewatering:
 Q represents the volumetric flow rate of groundwater, indicating how much water can be
pumped out of the mine per unit of time (e.g., cubic meters per second).

9.  K refers to the hydraulic conductivity of the porous medium surrounding the well. It
represents the ability of the material to transmit water and is a crucial factor in
determining how easily water can flow through the aquifer.
 A represents the cross-sectional area through which groundwater flows perpendicular to
the direction of flow. It depends on the configuration of the well and the surrounding
aquifer.
 (dh/dL) denotes the hydraulic gradient, which indicates the change in hydraulic head
(water level) per unit distance in the direction of groundwater flow. The hydraulic
gradient drives the flow of groundwater towards the well.
In the context of mine dewatering wells, Darcy's law is instrumental in understanding the
behavior of groundwater and optimizing the dewatering process. Here's how it applies:
1. Estimating Flow Rates: By applying Darcy's law, engineers can estimate the flow rates of
groundwater that need to be pumped out of the mine. The hydraulic conductivity of the
surrounding rock or soil, along with the hydraulic gradient created by the dewatering
well, helps determine the rate at which water can be extracted.
2. Optimizing Well Design: Darcy's law aids in optimizing the design of dewatering wells.
Factors such as the well screen design, placement, and spacing can be carefully
considered to enhance the efficiency of groundwater capture and minimize the energy
requirements for pumping.
3. Assessing Drawdown Effects: Darcy's law allows for the prediction and assessment of
drawdown effects caused by pumping wells. It helps estimate the extent of water table
decline around the mine and the resulting impacts on nearby water resources, such as the
lowering of water levels in surrounding wells, rivers, or lakes.
4. Managing Groundwater Inflows: Understanding Darcy's law helps mine operators
effectively manage groundwater inflows. By analyzing the hydraulic conductivity and the
hydraulic gradient, engineers can assess the potential for groundwater to infiltrate the
mine and make informed decisions regarding well placement and pumping rates to
mitigate inflow risks.
5. Sustainable Dewatering Practices: Darcy's law contributes to sustainable dewatering
practices by enabling the optimization of pumping rates. By carefully managing the

10. hydraulic gradient and considering the characteristics of the aquifer, engineers can avoid
excessive drawdown, maintain the long-term productivity of the well, and ensure the
sustainable use of groundwater resources.
In summary, Darcy's law provides a foundational understanding of groundwater flow in porous
media, which is vital for comprehending and optimizing the hydraulics of mine dewatering
wells. By applying Darcy's law, engineers can estimate flow rates, optimize well design, assess
drawdown effects, manage groundwater inflows, and implement sustainable dewatering practices
to ensure safe and efficient mining operations.
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND ITS ROLE IN MINE DEWATERING WELLS
Hydraulic conductivity, a fundamental parameter in hydrogeology, plays a critical role in mine
dewatering wells. It is a measure of a porous medium's ability to transmit water and is essential
in understanding and optimizing the flow of groundwater during dewatering operations in mines.
Hydraulic conductivity (K) quantifies the ease with which water can move through the porous
rock or soil surrounding a mine. It is influenced by various factors, including the grain size
distribution, porosity, connectivity of pore spaces, and geological heterogeneity of the materials.
A higher hydraulic conductivity indicates a greater ability of the medium to transmit water, while
a lower hydraulic conductivity signifies reduced water flow.
In mine dewatering, hydraulic conductivity plays several significant roles:
1. Aquifer Assessment: Knowledge of hydraulic conductivity allows hydrogeologists to assess
the permeability characteristics of the aquifer surrounding the mine. It helps determine the
potential for groundwater movement and the rate at which water can be extracted during
dewatering.
2. Well Design and Placement: Hydraulic conductivity guides the design and placement of
dewatering wells. Areas with higher hydraulic conductivity are typically preferred for well
installation as they allow for more efficient extraction of groundwater. Well placement in zones
with lower hydraulic conductivity requires careful consideration to optimize well efficiency and
capture as much water as possible.

11. 3. Estimating Well Performance: Hydraulic conductivity is a critical parameter for estimating the
potential yield or flow rate of dewatering wells. By considering the hydraulic conductivity of the
surrounding aquifer, engineers can determine the amount of water that can be extracted from the
mine per unit of time. This information helps in selecting appropriate well designs, pump
capacities, and dewatering strategies.
4. Pumping Rates and Energy Consumption: Hydraulic conductivity influences the pumping
rates required to effectively lower groundwater levels in the mine. Higher hydraulic conductivity
allows for higher extraction rates, reducing the duration and energy consumption of the
dewatering process. In contrast, lower hydraulic conductivity necessitates longer pumping times
and higher energy requirements.
5. Groundwater Control and Slope Stability: Hydraulic conductivity affects the control of
groundwater and the stability of pit slopes during mining operations. Dewatering aims to
depressurize the pit slopes by lowering the groundwater levels. Understanding the hydraulic
conductivity of the slope materials helps engineers determine the optimal dewatering strategy to
maintain slope stability and prevent instability risks associated with high pore water pressures.
6. Monitoring and Optimization: Monitoring hydraulic conductivity during dewatering
operations provides valuable information about changes in the aquifer's properties and potential
clogging issues. This data helps optimize pumping rates, adjust well designs, and ensure
continuous and effective dewatering over time.
By considering the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer surrounding a mine, engineers and
hydrogeologists can make informed decisions regarding well design, placement, and pumping
rates to achieve efficient and effective dewatering. Understanding hydraulic conductivity enables
the optimization of mine dewatering operations, ensures slope stability, reduces energy
consumption, and supports sustainable management of groundwater resources during mining
activities.
HYDRAULIC EFFICIENCYAND PRODUCTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH MINE
DEWATERING WELLS

12. Hydraulic efficiency and productivity are key considerations in the design and operation of mine
dewatering wells. These factors determine the effectiveness and economic viability of the
dewatering process, ensuring the efficient removal of groundwater from the mine.
1. Hydraulic Efficiency: Hydraulic efficiency refers to how effectively a dewatering well system
captures and removes groundwater from the mine. Several factors influence hydraulic efficiency:
a. Well Design: The design of the dewatering well, including its diameter, depth, and screen
configuration, affects the flow characteristics and efficiency of water extraction. Well design
should consider the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer, ensuring proper placement and screen
design to maximize water intake while minimizing clogging risks.
b. Pumping Rate: The rate at which water is pumped out of the well impacts hydraulic
efficiency. It should be optimized to maintain a hydraulic gradient that promotes effective
groundwater flow towards the well, without causing excessive drawdown or instability.
c. Well Spacing: The spacing between dewatering wells is crucial to ensure efficient coverage
of the aquifer and minimize the interference between adjacent wells. Proper well spacing allows
for adequate capture of groundwater, preventing excessive drawdown in localized areas and
improving overall hydraulic efficiency.
d. Pumping Equipment: The selection and performance of pumping equipment, including
pumps and motors, influence hydraulic efficiency. Properly sized and maintained equipment
ensures optimal water extraction rates and reduces energy consumption.
e. Aquifer Heterogeneity: The heterogeneity of the aquifer, including variations in hydraulic
conductivity and stratigraphy, can impact hydraulic efficiency. Understanding the aquifer's
characteristics and adjusting well design and pumping strategies accordingly helps optimize
efficiency.
2. Productivity: Productivity in mine dewatering refers to the volume of water that can be
effectively extracted from the mine per unit of time. Several factors affect dewatering
productivity:

13. a. Well Yield: The yield of individual dewatering wells, determined by factors such as
hydraulic conductivity, well design, and pumping rates, influences productivity. Higher well
yields allow for greater water extraction, leading to increased productivity.
b. Number of Wells: The number of dewatering wells deployed in the mine affects overall
productivity. An optimal well network, considering the mine's hydrogeological conditions, can
enhance productivity by efficiently capturing groundwater from various locations within the
mine.
c. Pumping Capacity: The pumping capacity of the dewatering system, determined by the size
and number of pumps, affects productivity. Adequate pumping capacity ensures that water is
extracted at a rate that meets or exceeds the inflow of groundwater, maintaining desired water
levels in the mine.
d. Pumping Schedule: Establishing an appropriate pumping schedule, considering the mine's
operational requirements and groundwater inflow dynamics, helps optimize productivity.
Continuous or scheduled pumping can maintain desired water levels and enhance overall
efficiency.
e. Maintenance and Monitoring: Regular maintenance and monitoring of the dewatering
system are crucial for sustaining productivity. Ensuring proper functioning of pumps, monitoring
well performance, and addressing any issues promptly contribute to sustained productivity over
the mine's lifespan.
Optimizing hydraulic efficiency and productivity in mine dewatering wells requires a
comprehensive understanding of the aquifer characteristics, well design principles, pumping
strategies, and ongoing monitoring. By considering these factors, mine operators can ensure
effective groundwater control, reduce operational risks, and enhance the overall efficiency of
mining operations.
LITERATURE REVIEW
A review of various studies and reports reveals the significant impact of mining activities on
water resources, particularly in relation to environmental concerns and water management. The

14. Congress on water in mining and underground water works (SIASMOS-78) highlighted the
problems associated with water in mining, including environmental issues and the management
of water resources. This concern has now become a reality, as emphasized by Rafael Fernandez
and David Fernandez in 1993.
The importance of hydrology in agriculture was emphasized by John Harbinson, who discussed
how modifications to hydrology can affect the viability of agriculture and the environmental
health of waterways. As agriculture plays a vital role in human life, Larry Martin recommended
the continued monitoring of alluvial groundwater to protect water resources from the impacts of
mining activities.
On a global perspective, extensive research has been conducted on hydrology and groundwater.
Researchers have explored groundwater geo-indicators in Rio Cuarto, Argentina, focusing on
piezometric levels and water quality indicators. The Ground Water Federal Facilities and
Engineering Forum was established by the United States Environment Protection Agency
(USEPA) to facilitate research in this field.
In the United States, various methods for studying groundwater have been investigated.
Groundwater sampling procedures for monitoring wells have been recommended for RCRA
(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) groundwater studies. The International Water
Management Institute (IWMI) conducts research on the hydrology of groundwater and has
conducted an assessment of groundwater availability and its current potential use and impacts in
Tanzania.
The impact of mining activities on groundwater resources and the surrounding environment has
been extensively studied. For example, a study in eastern Kentucky examined the hydrogeology,
hydrochemistry, and spoil settlement in a large mine spoil area. It found that mine spoils caused
settlement and differential displacement. Another study focused on the mobilization of arsenic in
groundwater in Ekando Titi, Cameroon, which revealed that around 4,000 people are at risk of
arsenic poisoning.
Contamination of water bodies by bacteria and viruses is another concern. A study in Abeokuta,
Nigeria, analyzed the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of well water, stream water,

15. and river water used for drinking and swimming. The results indicated contamination in some
locations, posing potential health hazards.
The interaction between mining activities and groundwater flow patterns has been investigated.
A study in Wyoming examined the geohydrology and potential effects of coal mining on
groundwater flow and quality. It found that mining can alter the groundwater flow system and
lead to changes in water quality.
Coastal aquifers face challenges such as saline water intrusion. A study in the Korinthos
Prefecture in Greece focused on nitrate pollution in the coastal aquifer system, highlighting the
deterioration of water quality due to crop over-fertilization and septic tank use.
Shallow wells are often vulnerable to pollution. A study in Ikordu, Lagos, Nigeria, examined the
biological, physical, and chemical quality of shallow water and found pollution indicators such
as total dissolved solids, coliforms, and nitrates, posing potential health hazards.
National perspectives on hydrology and groundwater studies have been conducted in various
states in India. These studies address issues such as groundwater pollution, dependence on
external water sources, heavy metal contamination, declining water quality, and the impact of
mining on vulnerable sections of society.
For example, in the state of Karnataka, the State of Environment Report (2003) highlighted the
need for environmental clearances for mining projects. Anand, Gujarat, conducted a study to
provide a base for integrated water resource management, emphasizing the high dependence on
external water sources in peninsular and hard rock cities.
Studies have also addressed heavy metal contamination in groundwater from industrial activities
and the decline of groundwater quality in various regions.
Case studies have been conducted in specific mining areas, such as limestone mining areas in
Madhya Pradesh and the impact of mining in scheduled areas of Orissa. These studies highlight
the economic and environmental implications of mining activities on local communities.
Sea water intrusion and mine water mixing with groundwater have been studied in coastal
regions, such as limestone mine sites along the Gujarat coast. The studies found evidence of sea
water intrusion in coastal aquifers.

16. The hydrochemical analysis of mine water and its impact on adjacent water bodies has been
investigated in coal fields. High levels of biological contamination were observed, leading to
chemical pollution in streams and rivers.
Studies have also explored groundwater quality variations during different seasons, such as in the
Sukhinda valley of Orissa, known for chromite ores. The study found suspended particles
causing toxicity in groundwater, rendering it unsuitable for drinking.
Preventing or controlling sea water intrusion has been the focus of studies in the Chilika lake
barrier split system on the east coast of India. The studies recommended minimizing pumping
from bore wells to control sea water intrusion.
Various studies have assessed the hydrochemical analysis of groundwater in different regions,
highlighting variations in chemical contents and water quality. Studies have also examined
aquifer thickness and its impact on groundwater parameters.
In summary, these literature reviews highlight the significant environmental and hydrological
challenges posed by mining activities on water resources. They emphasize the need for
monitoring, management, and sustainable utilization of groundwater to mitigate the negative
impacts on ecosystems and human populations.
METHODOLOGY
We read a lot of existing books on the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells. We downloaded
most of these books from the pdf drive website and library genesis. We also used online
databases like ResearchGate and Google Scholar to find studies and articles written on this topic.
We also used the university library.
In addition, we also watched videos on YouTube that discussed how the various processes took
place. We searched for these videos using keywords such as “mine dewatering” and "hydraulics
of wells" to find videos with relevant content.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

17. 1. Pump Performance Analysis
In this study, the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells were investigated to assess the
performance of pumps used for dewatering operations. The analysis focused on parameters such
as pump discharge, well diameter, and pumping rate. The results obtained are discussed below.
2. Pump Discharge
The pump discharge is a critical factor in determining the efficiency of the dewatering process. It
represents the volume of water discharged by the pump per unit of time. In this study, the
discharge rates were measured for different well diameters and pumping rates.
The results showed that as the well diameter increased, the pump discharge also increased. This
is because a larger well diameter allows for a higher volume of water to enter the well, resulting
in increased pump performance. Similarly, an increase in the pumping rate led to an increase in
the pump discharge. This indicates that higher pumping rates result in higher water removal
rates, improving the dewatering process.
3. Well Diameter
The well diameter plays a crucial role in determining the hydraulic efficiency of mine dewatering
wells. In this study, different well diameters were examined to understand their impact on the
dewatering process.
The results demonstrated that larger well diameters resulted in increased pump efficiency. This is
due to the larger cross-sectional area of the well, allowing for a greater volume of water to be
drawn into the well, leading to improved dewatering performance. Conversely, smaller well
diameters showed lower pump efficiency, as they restrict the water inflow, limiting the
dewatering rate.
4. Pumping Rate
The pumping rate, defined as the flow rate at which water is extracted from the well, plays a
crucial role in mine dewatering operations. The study examined the influence of different
pumping rates on the dewatering process.

18. The findings revealed that higher pumping rates resulted in more efficient dewatering. This is
because increased pumping rates create a greater drawdown in the well, leading to a larger
hydraulic gradient and enhanced water flow towards the well. Consequently, higher pumping
rates facilitate faster dewatering and allow for the lowering of groundwater levels in a shorter
period.
5. Pumping Efficiency
Pumping efficiency is an important parameter to assess the overall performance of dewatering
wells. It represents the ratio of the pump's output power to the input power. In this study, the
pumping efficiency was evaluated for different pumping rates and well diameters.
The results indicated that pumping efficiency varied with both pumping rate and well diameter.
Higher pumping rates generally exhibited lower pumping efficiency due to increased friction
losses and the requirement for higher input power. Similarly, smaller well diameters showed
reduced pumping efficiency as they led to higher flow velocities and increased energy losses.
6. Limitations and Future Research
It is important to note that this study focused solely on the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells
and pump performance analysis. However, several other factors can influence the overall
dewatering process, such as geological conditions, aquifer properties, and the presence of
impurities or solids in the water.
Further research is needed to explore these additional factors and their impact on the efficiency
of mine dewatering operations. Additionally, studying the effects of different pumping strategies,
such as intermittent pumping or variable pumping rates, would provide valuable insights into
optimizing the dewatering process and reducing energy consumption.
In conclusion, the results obtained in this study highlight the significance of well diameter,
pumping rate, and pump discharge in the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells. Understanding
these factors is crucial for efficient dewatering operations, enabling effective groundwater
control and ensuring safe and sustainable mining practices.
CONCLUSION

19. In conclusion, the study on the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells has provided valuable
insights into the complex process of removing groundwater from mining operations. The
investigation focused on understanding the hydraulic factors that influence the efficiency and
effectiveness of dewatering wells.
The findings emphasize the significance of well design and pumping parameters in achieving
optimal dewatering performance. The diameter of the well was identified as a critical factor, with
larger diameters resulting in improved hydraulic efficiency and higher water removal rates. This
underscores the importance of considering well dimensions during the planning and design
stages of mine dewatering projects.
Furthermore, the pumping rate was identified as a key parameter affecting the dewatering
process. Higher pumping rates were found to enhance water removal by creating greater
drawdown and increasing the hydraulic gradient. However, it is important to balance the
pumping rate with energy consumption and pumping efficiency to optimize dewatering
operations.
The study also highlighted the need for efficient pump performance to ensure effective
dewatering. Pump discharge, representing the volume of water discharged per unit of time, was
found to be influenced by the well diameter and pumping rate. Understanding the relationship
between these parameters is crucial for selecting appropriate pump systems and achieving
desired dewatering outcomes.
Overall, the knowledge gained from the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells contributes to the
advancement of mining practices. It enables mine operators to make informed decisions
regarding well design, pumping parameters, and pump selection, leading to improved
groundwater control, enhanced working conditions, and increased operational efficiency.
However, it is important to note that the hydraulics of mine dewatering wells are influenced by
various site-specific factors, such as geological conditions, aquifer properties, and the presence
of impurities. Future research should explore these additional factors to develop more
comprehensive models and strategies for mine dewatering.
In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of understanding the hydraulics of mine
dewatering wells in achieving efficient and sustainable mining operations. By optimizing well

20. design, pumping parameters, and pump selection, mine operators can effectively manage
groundwater levels, ensure safe working environments, and minimize the environmental impact
of mining activities.
REFERENCES
Beale, G. and Read, J.R.L. 2013. Guidelines for evaluating water in pit slope stability. CRC Press, Leiden.
Cashman, P.M. and Preene, M. 2012. Groundwater lowering in construction: a practical guide to
dewatering, 2nd edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Cliff, M.I. and Smart, P.C. 1998. The use of recharge trenches to maintain groundwater levels. Quarterly
Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 31, 137–145.
Cox, S. and Powrie, W. 2001. Horizontal wells for leachate control in landfill. Ground Engineering,
January, 18–19.
Fernández-Rubio, R. and Lorca Fernández, D. 2010. Artificial recharge of groundwater in mining. In,
International Mine Water Association Symposium – Mine Water Innovative Thinking. Wolkersdorfer, C.
and Freund, A. (Eds), Sydney, Nova Scotia (CBU Press), 77–81.
Huxley, C.L., Gill, T.S., Carroll, L.S. and Thompson, A. 2004.Optimising the efficiency of recharge features
as a mechanism for mitigating the impacts of quarry dewatering – research report. Report to the
Minerals Industry Research Organisation and The Department of the Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs. Symonds Group Ltd, East Grinstead.
Leech, S. and McGann, M. 2008. Open pit slope depressurization using horizontal drains – a case study.
Mine Water and the Environment. Rapantova, N. and Hrkal, Z. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th
International Mine Water Association Congress, Karlsbad, Czech Republic,73–76.
Privett, K.D., Matthews, S.C. and Hodges, R.A. 1996. Barriers, liners and cover systems for containment
and control of land contamination. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, CIRIA
Special Publication 124, London.
Rea, I. and Monaghan, D. 2009. Dewatering bore pumps – reducing costs and emissions by maximising
pump efficiency over time. Mining Technology,118, 220–224.