Wolves were hunted and poisoned to extinction in Sweden and Norway by the mid-20th century. Three wolves migrated from Russia and founded a new Scandinavian wolf population in the early 1980s. That population now consists of approximately 100 animals. How large do you think the Scandinavian wolf population should be to maintain genetic variation that may be important for the viability (continued persistence) and continued evolution of this population? There is some possibility of gene flow into this population from Russian wolves. Do you think that it is important that gene flow between the Scandinavian and the Russian populations be maintained in the future? Why? Solution There is no cut-off formula for calculating the length of population to maintain genetic diversity. It is important to note that even after bottleneck effect populations are able to survive and are able to maintain genetic diversity. Here, there are 100 animals; and these 100 animals are heterozygous, not pure lines; because they have already mixed up with the Scandinavian population. So, the population is large enough to maintain genetic variation. Yes, there is further possibility of mixing of this population with Russian wolves further also; but that possibility is very rare. This is so because wolves have already been extinct over there; as per the question. No, it is no more compulsion for gene flow between the two populations. This is so because the populations have already diverged. And a subsequent amount of genetic variability has been attained..