Dictatorship, Conspiracies, And Uprisings

Dictatorship, Conspiracies, And Uprisings
Dictatorship, conspiracies, and uprisings are what led to the Mexican Revolution. The long battle
among various sectors and changing alliances resulted in the victory of ending the thirty–year
dictatorship in Mexico as well as the development of a constitutional republic. The Mexican
Revolution was the first revolution of modern times that focused on the needs and dreams of the
Mexican people. In the following discussion, we will dissect the history of the Mexican Revolution
and how it has shaped an essential part of Mexico 's history.
During the 30–year period, there are several phases that caused the revolution to unfold. Between
the years 1810 and 1821, Mexico fought and won their independence from Spain. As a result of their
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, a limited amount of powerful families and their clients dominated political and
economic power in the regions (Knight, 1980).
Porfirio Diaz was able to control the people of Mexico for such an extensive amount of time due to
his political system and the authority of his notorious Rurales. The Rurales were the government
force of men used to patrol the Mexican Pueblos (valleys). If the Rurales caught people stealing,
intoxicated, or disrespecting Diaz, they were either shot and killed immediately or sent to southern
plantations as slave workers. During this time, life for the Mexican people was filled with poverty,
fear, and hopelessness.
The Mexican Revolution commenced as a movement of the middle–class in 1910. The people were
rising and protesting against the extensive, 34–year dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz. Francisco Ignacio
Madero, a wealthy business man, become part of and led the Anti–Reelectionist Movement.
Francisco Madero announced his candidacy and demanded Porfirio Diaz not to force himself to be
reelected. Through corruption and coercion, Diaz declared himself the winner of the election and
ordered Madero 's arrest; however, Madero was able to escape before being captured. While hiding
alone in San Antonio, Texas, Francisco Madero published his plan, Plan
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay about A Personal Trip to Mexico and The Mexican...
The Mexican Revolution was an attempt to overthrow a dictatorial tyrant, Porfirio Diaz that ruled
the country of Mexico for decades. His autonomic attitude and self–centered beliefs eventually
angered the people, although he successfully tried and failed to bring to life prosperity to the country
as well as strengthen the ties with the United States.
As I travel through the country of Mexico battered by hardships and misery, I take notes, write down
what I observe over the course of my journey, and interview the people of the run downed country,
obtaining a first hand glimpse of a life under complete control. Like a fly on the wall, my eyewitness
accounts prove evidence of turmoil within Mexico in which the people face adversity to over ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As I walk down the street, tortilla stands crowd the corners of intersections of the streets as the
aroma of tortillas suffocate my nostrils. Directly next to the steaming tortillas, is a meat rotisserie
with a rotating chunk of Al Pator cooking on a low flame for hours prior to lunch. As Mexicans get
ready to go to work, the aroma of pan dulce drowns out the aroma of tortillas attracting locals to
grab a couple of breads and a cup of coffee before they are on their way. As the day progresses on,
gunshots rang out and quickly I threw myself to the ground, protecting my neck and head. Five
minutes have passed and the gunfire still has not ceased. Like a soldier in training, I crawled my
way to an alley where a dumpster sat all alone. Fearing for my life, I pried open the top of the trash
can and jumped quickly inside. Unaware of what was inside, I simply did not care, as my life was
more valuable. Ten minutes have now passed and finally the gun battle has been terminated. As I
open the lid of the trash can, I can hear voices, yelling, screaming, and crying. Curious as to what
has just happened, I jump out of the trashcan and begin to walk back towards the street. Upon
arrival, the amount of bodies and bloodshed was unbelievable. At least three bodies littered every
corner of the intersection. All I could wonder and ask myself was, "For what? Why?" Seeking for
protection, I headed south deep into the city where I hoped to see peace. Boy was I wrong. As I
turned

Why Is Scott Van Winkle Important
Scott Van Winkle (MLA Format)
My Thesis is, the Mexican Revolution was important because the people were getting fed up and
something needed to be done about the corruption and the possibility of a free–market. This kind of
"opportunity" would help the rich but the poor would only have a larger gap into the steps of
economical and political society. People were unsatisfied with the Diaz Regime and it had now
effected much larger groups. Liberals and radicals wanting democracy, owners of land not wanting
foreign control, and people suffering for regulated pay and healthy working environments. Several
landowners lost their land to landowner takeovers.
"A call to arms by Francisco Madero, a leader of the prodemocracy forces, united the disparate
groups opposed to Diaz which succeeded in overthrowing the Porfirian government and forcing
Diaz into exile" (Vanden & Prevost 319).
With Madero's efforts he was able to become president but was assassinated by a team put together
by Victoriano Huerta. "Two Mexico's" was addressed when the Revolution was sparked and taken
control by Venustiano Carranza part of the constitutionalist army and Emiliano Zapata which whom
will be under credited for their efforts in the future. They took Huerta out of power in 1914.
After the victory there was a split between the two revolution leaders due to differences in direction
for Mexico. The Constitutionalist

The Life and Legacy of Doroteo Arango Essay
Many people do not know the true story of Francisco "Pancho" Villa. Pancho Villa was actually
born Doroteo Arango Arambula on June 5, 1878 in San Juan del Rio, Mexico. Doroteo's parents
were uneducated, peasant sharecrop farmers. This fact is important because Doroteo had a high level
of intelligence even though he did not have any formal education. After his father's death, Doroteo
took his father's place as a sharecropper and helped support his mother and four sisters. There are
many versions of how Doroteo became the outlaw bandit Pancho Villa. The most widely accepted
story is that Doroteo shot and or killed Augustin Negrete over the attempted rape of Doroteo's
twelve year old sister (Rosenburg 3). This event became the catalyst to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Pancho Villa redistributed the wealth gained from his illegal activities. He often took the money
from the rich and gave it to the poor. These deeds led him to be known as a modern day Mexican
Robin Hood. In addition to giving the poor people of Mexico money, Villa reallocated land and
stabilized the economy in Chihuahua, Mexico and surrounding areas. It is not clear if Pancho Villa
purposely killed the landowners or if they were causalities of war. In any event, Pancho gave land to
the widows and children of his fallen soldiers (Williams 12). Villa also built schools for orphans,
distributed food, and improved the water supply. He continued to be favored by the citizens of
Mexico as his actions were vital to the regions continued growth and betterment. Pancho Villa
greatest historical contribution was his role as a Mexican revolutionary. It is a well known fact that
he was an effective leader and well skilled in the art of guerilla warfare (Rosenberg 8). At one time,
Villa was a general, commanding his own military force. His army was known as "Division del
Norte." At its best, the army contained over fifty thousand soldiers. According to the A&E television
program Bio. True Story, Villa's army was one of the largest ever congregated in the Americas.
During his time as general, Pancho Villa won many important battles. These battles included the
first and second

El Assassination Of Pancho Villa The Conspiracy
Castro, Tony. "Pancho Villa Documentary Hopes to Discover Who Killed the Mexican
Revoultionary" Huffingpost, July 14, 2013, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/14/pancho–
villa–documnetary_n_3594348.html. Nov. 4, 2017 The article written by Castro, speaks on the
documentary, El Asesinato de Villa La Conspiración, which means The Assassination of Villa the
Conspiracy. The writer talks about how the documentary analyzes the assassination, he also talks
about how after the revolution was over Villa spoke with authority and negotiated that he will live a
nice, civilized, humble life. The writer tells us how Villa's assassination was well planned out by
supporters of the man who was to keep Villa safe, President Álvaro Obergon. He lastly speaks ...
Nov. 4, 2013 The first part of the article is dedicated to Villa as a bandit, it mainly speaks on what he
wanted to get away from when went to the ranch for the humble life. The next section begins with
his agreement with Álvaro Obregón to surrender himself and stay out of politics/ for a quiet life.
Three years after the death of President Carranza, Villa broke the agreement and got involved in
Mexican Politics which could have been a motive. The second to last section speaks on the death
itself, Villa riding to Parral without many bodyguards taking care of business, and someone charges
to the car screaming "Viva Villa" signaling for people to shoot. 7 shooters, 40 bullets, four in the
head killing him instantly, three others in the car died. It's said he died saying, "Don't let it end like
this. Tell them I said something". There were many who wished they could've done what those
assassins did, meaning it was many suspects. The last section talks about how it's said that Obregon
gave permission to the assassination, and state legislator is said to be responsible for the plot,
Parral's commander of troop was bribed 50,000 pesos to ensure the police and troops were nowhere
around July 20, 1923, the day of Villa's

Pancho Villa Research Paper
My report is on José Doroteo Arango Arámbula also known as Pancho Villa.He was born June 5,
1878, in San Juan del Rio, Durango, Mexico.He was assassinated and died on on July 20, 1923, in
Parral, Mexico.Pancho Villa started as a bandit,his inspiration was a man named reformer Francisco
Madero, he helped him to win the Mexican Revolution. After a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure
of power by Victoriano Huerta, Villa formed his own army to oppose the dictator.Most of his life as
a kid was spent by helping his parents on their farm,his dad died when he was fifteen and he now
was the head of the household.He shot a man who was harassing one of his sisters in 1894. He fled,
spending six years on the run in the mountains. While there, he joined ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With Villa's skills at reading, writing, fighting and his knowledge of the land, Madero was named a
revolutionary leader and his company won the first Battle of Ciudad Juárez in 1911. The rebels
eventually drove Díaz out of power, and Madero took the position of president, having named Villa
a colonel.General Victoriano Huerta and Villa worked together to protect Madero's new authority,
but after Huerta accused Villa of stealing his horse, Villa's execution was ordered. Although Madero
was able to grant Villa a reprieve shortly before his execution, he was still required to serve time in
prison in June 1912.He escaped prison and found out Huerta was against Madero and assassinated
him on February

Emiliano Zapata
Emiliano Zapata, born on August 8, 1879, in the village of Anenecuilco, Morelos (Mexico),
Emiliano Zapata was of mestizo heritage and the son of a peasant medier, (a sharecropper or owner
of a small plot of land). From the age of eighteen, after the death of his father, he had to support his
mother and three sisters and managed to do so very successfully. The little farm prospered enough to
allow Zapata to augment the already respectable status he had in his native village. In September of
1909, the residents of Anenecuilco elected Emiliano Zapata president of the village's "defense
committee," an age–old group charged with defending the community's interests. In this position, it
was Zapata's duty to represent his village's rights before ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Madero's most important demands had been met, Díaz was out of office, and regular elections were
to be held to determine his successor. León de la Barra, however, was not a president to Zapata's
liking. While of great personal integrity, his political skills were lacking. The new president could
not assuage the peasants, especially since his allegiance was clearly with the rich planters who were
trying to regain control of Mexico, aided by the conditions of the Treaty of Ciudad Juárez. Even
though Zapata had been ordered to cease all hostilities, he and 5,000 men entered and captured
Cuernavaca, the capital of his native state of Morelos. In 1911, Madero was elected president of
Mexico, and Zapata met with him to discuss the demands of the peasantry. The meeting was
fruitless and the former allies parted in anger. The only joy those days held for the thirty–one–year–
old Zapata was his marriage to his bride Josefa, only six days after the ill–fated meeting with the
president. Officially, the Zapatistas were disbanded and Zapata himself was in retirement. The police
forces, in disarray after fighting the revolutionary forces, were no match for the new wave of bandits
that were now roaming the land. The situation in Mexico deteriorated, assassination plots against the
new president surfaced, renewed fighting between government and revolutionary forces ensued, and
the smell of revolution was once again hanging over the cities of Mexico. In the "Plan of

The French Revolution : The Causes Of The Mexican Revolution
–– The Mexican Revolution ––
The Mexican Revolution was a complex and bloody conflict which lasted about a decade, and in
which one million people lost their lives.
So...did the ends justify the means?
Causes:
The Mexican people wanted to overthrow the dictator at the time, Porfirio Díaz Mori who had been
in office for 34 years, longer than any other dictator had ever ruled Mexico. He violated a good
amount of the laws put in place by the Constitution of 1857.
People were not happy with him because, like with most dictators, under his regime the policies
favored the wealthy. He took large amounts of land from the poor and gave it to the rich.
Everybody, but especially the somewhat educated, and economically stable middle class wanted a
democracy.
An important group :
The Magonistas – an archarist group, who in 1908 (two years before the revolution) were the only
group who outwardly opposed Diaz. The wrote anti–Diaz propaganda in their newspaper,
Regeneracion.
Events:
In 1908, Diaz announced he was going to step down at the end of his term.
In 1910, he breaks his promise and runs for reelection, but so does Francisco Madero. Diaz
imprisons Madero on charges of "fomenting a rebellion and insulting the authorities", and Diaz wins
the election, being the only candidate. Madero escapes prison and flees to Texas from where in
October, he publishes the "Plan de San Luis Potosí" calling for a revolt on November 20. That is
where many mark the start of the revolution.

Francisco Pancho Villa As A Folk Hero
Francisco Pancho Villa was a popular Mexican guerilla and revolutionary leader that won the hearts
of many by fighting for the poor. He was part of the uprising of Francisco Madero against Porfirio
Díaz in 1909, who was then the Mexican President. Villa later graduated to become the División del
Norte cavalry's leader and Chihuahua's governor. Villas life was filled with rebellion and violence.
Villa killed over 30 Americans in several attacks after conflicting with Venustiano Carranza who
was his former revolutionary ally. Villa was able to evade capture eluded capture and was pardoned
by Mexican President Adolfo de la Huerta in 1920 where he lived until he was killed. Pancho Villa
is remembered as a folk hero by most Mexicans due to his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Similar to most of the 19th–century rulers of Mexico, Diaz was an officer of the army that attained
power through a coup. However, different from his predecessors, Diaz created a stable political
system where the officially representative Constitution of 1857 was bypassed. In addition, the
system involved the control of elections by local political bosses, public order and political
opposition, while most of the influential families monopolized political and economic power in the
provinces. In the revolution, Madero had interests in political reforms that would end up keeping the
economic and social structure together. It left the unfulfilled aspirations and dreams of numerous
revolutionaries that viewed Díaz's overthrow as the start of a fresh system that had the sole aim of
helping all Mexicans. The dissatisfaction resulted in revolts. Actually, during Madero's short
presidency, he, together with his army commanded by Victoriano Huerta, were inquired to put down
over five diverse revolts. Emiliano Zapata was the first who declared himself against Madero, which
saw him issue the Plan de Ayala in November. There were many southern states that started
revolting the moment the movement took hold. The movement was never actually put down until
later.
It was not easy to rule under the new government's authority since Madero 's power had a
challenger,

The Mexican Revolution By Porfirio Diaz
The Mexican Revolution began in 1910, when after decades of authoritarian rule, the Mexican
leader, Porfirio Díaz, was challenged by Francisco I. Madero. Díaz was both the official and
unofficial ruler of Mexico from 1876 to 1911. During the Porfiriato, Díaz managed to modernise the
country through the development of mines, plantations, railways and telegraph lines. While these
developments brought great economic prosperity for Mexico, the quality of life of the peasants was
greatly diminished. The Ley Lerdo law, passed in 1856, meant that land that had previously been
communal and owned by the state could now be sold to the government to haciendados, and
peasants who had once worked the land were now treated almost as slaves by the large estate
owners. This strict hierarchical class system ensured that resentment formed between the peasants
and the middle classes. Elections in the country were also corrupt, with Díaz fixing the election of
1910, and often asking his self–appointed cabinet to amend the Constitution to allow him to do so.
Despite the economic prosperity of the Porfiriato, the social *unrest* throughout the country was
too great – people began to call for the deposition of Díaz as ruler. Several different groups were
involved in the fight for social reformation, but the most notable are known as the 'Big Four'. These
four warlords were Emiliano Zapata and the Zapatistas, Pancho Villa and the Villistas, Venustiano
Carranza and his Constitutionalist Army

The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela as a Reflection of the...
The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela as a Reflection of the Mexican Revolution
In 1910, the first social upheaval of the 20th century was unleashed in Mexico. Known as the
Mexican Revolution, its historical importance and impact inspired an abundance of internationally
renowned South American authors. Mariano Azuela is one of these, whose novel, "The Underdogs"
is often described as a classic of modern Hispanic literature. Having served as a doctor under
Pancho Villa, a revolutionary leader of the era, Azuela's experience in the Revolution provides The
Underdogs with incomparable authenticity of the political and social tendencies of the era between
1910 and 1920. The Underdogs recounts the living conditions of the Mexican peasants, the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is largely due to the fact that Diaz gave away the country's wealth to buy the loyalty of some,
by gifts of haciendas (large estates), concessions or cash. Under his leadership, the gap between the
rich and the poor grew undoubtedly larger due to his disregard of democratic principles and the
common folk, and his acute determination to keep his dictatorship by any means possible. One of
the most renowned opposition leaders of Diaz at the time was the European–educated Francisco
Madero. Madero led a series of strikes in resistance to Diaz across the country and eventually ran
against him in the election for presidency in 1911. Although Madero had a significant number of
votes, Diaz had him imprisoned because he felt the people of Mexico were not ready for democracy,
and feared the loss of his own presidency. Madero was not released until after the election so that
votes could be tabulated in favour of Diaz. When released from prison, Madero continued to fight
against his former adversary. Madero led the first phase of the armed revolution which resulted in
Diaz's defeat and to his own presidency reign until 1913. It was during this time that many of the
folk heroes of the Revolution emerged, including Francisco "Pancho" Villa of the North, and
Emiliano Zapata of the South. In 1913 Madero was assassinated by A Mexican general by the name
of Victoriano Huerta. Victoriano and his federal army was defeated in a coalition of armies led by
Alvara Obregon, who took

Ib History Paper 3 Guide
Sabrina Shaw
Hunter 2A
IB History of the Americas HL
7 November 2012
Paper 3 Guide: Mexican Revolution
Bullet Points: Defined and Summarized: 1. Causes of the Mexican Revolution: social, economic,
and political; the role of the Porfiriato regime * Porfirio Díaz was the dictator of Mexico from 1876
to 1910. His regime is known as the Porfiriato regime. Díaz's social ideologies and aims were to
divide and rule, obtain absolute power Díaz's methods were the Pan o Palo policy and the spoil
system. Díaz wanted to increase industrialization without increasing foreign investment and he used
the spoil system to gain the support of the wealthy landowners. Díaz's political goals were to have
autocratic rule, have absolute power, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Obregon was assassinated in 1928 before he won the reelection his second presidential term.
Calles:
* Calles held power indirectly through 3 presidents which were his "puppets". They were Emilio
Portes Gil, Pascual Ortiz Rubio, and Abelardo Rodríguez.
Calles plays an important role after the revolution since, because of him, there was a constitutional
change that allowed non–consecutive reelection within Mexico. In 1926, Calles also made an
anticlerical legislation by reforming the penal code, this law outlawed religious orders. Some
Mexican states such as Jalisco, Zacatecas, Guanajuato, Colima, and Michoacán, strongly opposed
the idea of this law ultimately leading to the Cristero war. The impact of Calles was very negative on
Mexico, because it plunged Mexico into another war.
Maximato:
* A time period of 1928–1935 in which Mexico was led by Plutarco Elias Calles, who is also known
as el Jefe Maximo (the supreme leader)
4. Lazaro Cardenas and the renewal of the revolution (1939–40): aims, methods, and achievements
* Lazaro Cardenas was the president from 1934–1940, quite a few years after the 1920 end to the
Mexican revolution. He distributed land, made loans available to peasants, organized workers' and
peasants' confederations, and expropriated and nationalized foreign–owned industries. One of his
successes was the six year plan, continuing the spirit of the Mexican

Emiliano Zapata Essay
Emiliano Zapata, born on August 8, 1879, in the village of Anenecuilco, Morelos (Mexico),
Emiliano Zapata was of mestizo heritage and the son of a peasant medier, (a sharecropper or owner
of a small plot of land). From the age of eighteen, after the death of his father, he had to support his
mother and three sisters and managed to do so very successfully. The little farm prospered enough to
allow Zapata to augment the already respectable status he had in his native village. In September of
1909, the residents of Anenecuilco elected Emiliano Zapata president of the village's "defense
committee," an age–old group charged with defending the community's interests. In this
position, it was Zapata's duty to represent his village's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Zapata, a rather cautious, soft–spoken man, had become a revolutionary.
During the first weeks of 1911, Zapata continued to build his organization in Morelos, training and
equipping his men and consolidating his authority as their leader. Soon, Zapata's band of
revolutionaries, poised to change their tactics and take the offensive, were known as Zapatistas. On
February 14, Francisco Madero, who had escaped the authorities to New Orleans, returned to
Mexico, knowing that it was time to restart his revolution with an all–out offensive. Less than a
month later, on March 11, 1911, "a hot, sticky Saturday night," the bloody phase of the
Mexican Revolution began at Villa de Ayala. There was no resistance from the villagers, who were
mostly sympathetic to the revolution, being sharecroppers or hacienda workers themselves, and the
local police were disarmed quickly. Not all battles that followed were this quick, however. The
revolution took its bloody course with the legendary Pancho Villa fighting in the northern part of
Mexico, while Zapata remained mainly south of Mexico City. On May 19, after a week of extremely
fierce fighting with government troops, the Zapatistas took the town of Cuautla. Only forty–eight
hours later, Francisco Madero and the Mexican government signed the Treaty of Ciudad Juárez,
which ended the presidency of Porfirio Díaz and named Francisco León de la Barra, former

Mexico During The 20th Century
Mexico in the 20th century
The development of Mexico has undergone a lot of issues that have especially occurred during the
20th century. In order for a nation to succeed in the world market it is vital that they are prosperous
in the political and economical portion of their nation. This has been an issue for Mexico and can be
partially blamed on the leadership as well as the revolutions and wars that have plagued their
country. In more detail the leadership of Diaz, the revolution and both World Wars, and the
corruption of the Mexican government parties have all been detrimental factors that has stalled the
progression of the nation in the early 20th century before the reconstruction that occurred after the
Mexican revolution. Mexico has not had many leaders or presidents partly because of the corrupt
that has been prevalent in their nation. Unlike America who has a strict two term policy, there is no
such enforced rule in Mexico. The first ruler of the 20th century was Porfirio Diaz who ruled from
1877 until 1910. His 34 year term was a strict violation of the Mexican constitution. This upset
many people which caused the rise of revolutionary leaders such as Francisco "Pancho" Villa and
Emiliano Zapata whose main intentions where to change the La encomienda system. They were
striving for a more modern system that would benefit the people who worked the land instead of
keeping the money for the land owners. While Diaz held office for 30 years, which was a clear

The Success Of A Revolution
Over the course of history different revolutions have come and gone, bringing along promises of
social, economic, and political change. However, the price of change isn 't always smooth and
effortless. Revolution doesn 't bring change at the blink of an eye, it takes time for the achievements
of a revolution to come to full fruition. It is almost inevitable that a revolution will have its failures
along the way, but these failures don 't overshadow the success of a revolution. It is not until the
common good is met that a revolution is deemed successful. When I talk about the common good, I
mean that which benefits society as a whole rather than an individual or a minority. The waves of
revolution and presidents in Mexico from 1910 to 1946 aimed at achieving the common good, and
some presidents succeeded more than others. This can be anything from social services such as free
health care and education, to freedom of speech and free elections. When it comes to quantifying the
success of a revolution, one must keep in mind the larger scope, not whether a revolution brings
immediate change but rather change felt down the road. The most important outcome of a revolution
is identifying whether or not it brings forth change. Did the waves of revolution bring change to
Mexico or was this change just a mere illusion? Looking at the Mexican Revolution from the point
of view of a historian, there is no doubt that the revolution brought change

The Success Of A Revolution
Over the course of history different revolutions have come and gone, bringing along promises of
social, economic, and political change. However, the price of change isn 't always smooth and
effortless. Revolution doesn 't bring change at the blink of an eye, it takes time for the achievements
of a revolution to come to full fruition. It is almost inevitable that a revolution will have its failures
along the way, but these failures don 't overshadow the success of a revolution. It is not until the
common good is met that a revolution is deemed successful. When I talk about the common good, I
mean that which benefits society as a whole rather than an individual or a minority. The waves of
revolution and presidents in Mexico from 1910 to 1946 aimed at achieving the common good, and
some presidents succeeded more than others. This can be anything from social services such as free
health care and education, to freedom of speech and free elections. When it comes to quantifying the
success of a revolution, one must keep in mind the larger scope, not whether a revolution brings
immediate change but rather change felt down the road. The most important outcome of a revolution
is identifying whether or not it brings forth change. Did the waves of revolution bring change to
Mexico or was this change just a mere illusion? Looking at the Mexican Revolution from the point
of view of a historian, there is no doubt that the revolution

Rigoberta Mechú, The Sequel
Elke Lynch
Global Issues
Ms. Maass
11 May 2016
I, Rigoberta Mechú, the Sequel
Background:
I was born January 9th, 1959 in Laj Chimel in Guatemala, as a member of the Quiche tribe, a tribe
made up of descendants of the Mayan Civilization. I lost my parents and brother in 1981, during
Guatemala's civil war because of my father's role as a government opposition leader. My brother,
Petrocinio, was kidnapped and killed by the army and my parents were killed in protest at the
Spanish Embassy, located in Guatemala city in 1981. ("A Tale of Suffering, Fame and Controversy).
My family was not alone in this injustice, however, many indigenous peasants who were
sympathetic to the rebels were killed during this war between the conservative government ... Show
Although this issue is not solved completely yet, I believe with continuous effort it can be changed
and I can hopefully create a positive economic impact in this way. I also organized the Guatemalan
Peace Coffee Program, which brought different indigenous groups together to produce coffee more
efficiently, which helped these groups economically. In 1992 I received the Nobel Peace Prize. The
committee claimed, "Menchú stands out as a vivid symbol of peace and reconciliation across ethnic,
cultural, and social dividing lines.'' In spite of this, my award was criticized by former Guatemalan
President Jorge Serrano Elias' administration who claimed that I was not honorable since I was
supposedly tied to certain groups which have endangered Guatemala. Another critique of mine was
about my book; American anthropologist David Stoll wrote a book in response, called Rigoberta
Menchú and the Story of all Poor Guatemalans, in which he claims that my accounts in my
autobiography are untrue, although I consider these accusations to be a racist political agenda, and
the Nobel Institute director Geir Lundestad refused to revoke my prize ("Rigoberta Menchú." Issues:
Understanding Controversy and

Modern Mexican Society And Its Culture
To understand modern Mexican society and its culture we have to analyze its social, economic and
political development through the early stages of industrialization and the conditions under which
this development took place. Following the Marxist theory of Historical Materialism, we will look at
the rise of capitalism during the Porfiriato (time period in which General Porfirio Diaz governed
Mexico), the class conflicts arising during this time period that produced the Mexican Revolution of
1910, the political structures and reforms that arise as a consequence of the revolution, and the
economic apparatus and its evolution through the decades of the post–revolution. We will look at
Mexico's role in the world's economy, and its close relationship with the United States economy.
Towards the end of the 19th century, Mexico was introduced to the world's capitalist system under
the rule of General Porfirio Diaz. During this period, the country experienced an important
economic and technological growth driven mainly by foreign investment. Concessions were given
to French and American companies for the expansion of railroads in Mexico to facilitate
communication and trade. Special attention was given to the development of the Veracruz port, and
important route for maritime trade with Mexico's capitol. Telegraph networks started expanding
throughout the nation and in 1878 the Mexican Telegraph, a U.S company, was commissioned to lay
a submarine cable to allow for communication

The Mexican Revolution Of 1910 Essay
In order to properly identify fundamental characteristics attributed to the Mexican Revolution of
1910, that may or may not deem it a legitimate revolution, we must first establish and define that
which is allocated by the term, revolution. Merriam Webster defines a revolution as, a complete
overthrow of an established government or political system. The Oxford Dictionary defines a
revolution as, "an overthrow of old government by force and replacing it by a new one. Funk and
Wagnall's Standard Desk Dictionary establishes that a revolution is, a great upheaval: a radical
change, especially in government. In lecture, class discussions describe characteristics of a
revolution as being of fundamental change in either a political power or governmental assembly,
taking place over a period of time, and carried out through action on behalf of the population as a
mass. More formerly, a mass rebellion of the institutions in place at the time of which the public
seeks to overrule. Given the variation in definitions above, I have found that the significance of the
word revolution has effectively been the same since the early 20th century. By this generalized
definition, in order to be successful, a revolution within a society must be carried out through the
will of that society as a mass of people collectively acting on behalf of the will of that society as a
whole. Upon success, the present form of government is overthrown while simultaneously, a
reformed government is

To What Extent Did Pancho Villa 's Relations With The U.s....
This investigation will explore the question: To what extent did Pancho Villa's relations with the
U.S. change his political image? I will be evaluating The Mexican Revolution by Adolfo Gilly as
well as The United States and Pancho Villa: A Study in Unconventional Diplomacy by Clarence C.
Clendenen. I selected these two sources to compare because the first source is written by Adolfo
Gilly, who is a professor in Mexico which means his viewpoint is different compared to Clarence
Clendenen's, who is a professor at Stanford University in the United States. The origins of the first
secondary source, The Mexican Revolution, by Adolfo Gilly was published in 2005. This source
describes the Mexican Revolution in depth specifically from the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However this source also addresses the opposite side due to the fact that he was a prisoner for a
time. This source has helped me with my investigation by providing information that is partial to the
Mexicans and specifically mentions how the peasants viewed Pancho Villa. The origins of the next
secondary source is written by Clarence Clendenen The United States and Pancho Villa: A Study in
Unconventional Diplomacy was published in 1961. This source depicts Pancho Villa and his
relations with the United States, specifically about how he would not have been able to succeed as a
revolutionary figure if it were not for the U.S government and Woodrow Wilson. The purpose the
author wrote this source is because he wanted to educate people, specifically U.S. citizens on how
the United States was seen as a superior country and poorer countries such as Mexico strived for
U.S. favor. The content this source is that Villa would not have been as successful were it not for the
favor of the U.S. This source is of value because it outlines specific details of how Pancho Villa's
image was transformed due to the U.S. This source has helped me in my investigation by giving
specific examples of how Pancho Villa used the media, however it has limited me because of the
fact it takes on the point of the U.S. perspective and does not give the perspective of the Mexicans.
Overall, I used both of these sources

Fxico Madero Pros And Cons
The country of Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1821 and over the coming decades
would see serious political strife while leaders fought for control of the country. In 1876 General
Porfirio Diaz seized control of the country and held power for the next thirty–four years. Diaz was a
no nonsense sort of leader, who did not allow any opposition to his policies. Diaz promoted
investment into Mexico's natural resources from foreign companies and improved the wages of
many of his supporters, while at the same time ignoring the lower classes who saw their wages
shrink and their livelihood suffer.
Economic strife during the 1907 to 1909 years allowed for opposition parties to rise up to challenge
Diaz. One such leader was Francisco Madero, who campaigned across Mexico for democratic
elections in a bid to oust Diaz. Diaz responded to Madero's Presidential bid by having him and five
thousand of his supporters arrested. Madero escaped across the border in 1910 and called on the
citizens of Mexico to rise up and overthrow Diaz. Other leaders like Emiliano Zapata and Francisco
(Pancho) Villa and Venustiano Carranza martialed their forces were able to force Diaz to ... Show
He encouraged his supporters to engage in massive but peaceful protests, that spread through the
country in 1978. The Shah and his forces responded by attacking the protesters, killing hundreds.
This caused the protests to grow until it callumated in Black Friday on September 8th 1978. The
Shah declared martial law and his forces killed thousands of protesters. Losing international support
from the United States, the Shah fled to Egypt and the Ayatollah returned back to Iran. Protest
continued with many blaming the United States for the Shahs actions and taking hostage workers at
the US Embassy in Tehran. They would be held as captives until January of

The Mexican Revolution Research Assignment
The Mexican Revolution Research Assignment
The Mexican revolution was a long and costly battle among several factions for agrarian reforms
that ultimately radically transformed Mexican politics and society.
1) Choose one of the wars and explain what type of war it was and why it is categorised as such?
(10 marks)
The Mexican Revolution can be categorised into two main types of war, revolutionary and civil.
Initially, the revolution began as a movement of middle–class protest against the 35–year regime of
Porfirio Diaz and his oligarchical policies. However, after Diaz was ousted from power and exiled in
May 1911, the revolution shifted into a multi–sided civil war. It can be divided into two distinct
eras; the decade of armed revolution from 1910–1920 and the period between 1920 and 1940 during
which political power was consolidated.
Revolution: a forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favour of a new system. A
revolution has distinct determining factors with strong discontent among a group because of poor
living conditions, or frustration with the existing government. It is evident it was a revolutionary
war due to the quintessential characteristics it possessed such as the discontent of the oligarchical
regime and the unequal distribution of money and land. The generic widespread dissatisfaction of
Diaz' dictatorship and the ultimate overthrow of his regime by those people are also typical features
of a revolution. The rise of insurgent leaders such as

A Reflection Of The Mexican Revolution
A Reflection of the Mexican Revolution "'I love the revolution like a volcano in eruption; I love the
volcano because it's a volcano; the revolution because it's the revolution!'" cries a revolutionary
soldier in Azuela's The Underdogs (159). The Mexican Revolution of 1910 was aimed to overthrow
the dictatorship of the Mexican government, which was in constant turmoil as presidents were
constantly toppled from power. Porfirio Diaz, the president at the time the uprising began, was
removed from power when revolutionary generals, Emiliano Zapata and Francisco "Pancho" Villa,
answered Francisco Madero's call for rebellion. After Madero took power, he was defeated by
Victoriano Huerta. Venustiano Carranza seized power from Huerta, and Alvaro Obregon gained
control after Carranza was deposed. The revolution lasted a decade and ended with the new Mexican
Constitution of 1917. These events are told in The Underdogs, by Mariano Azuela, in which a native
Indian, Demetrio Macias, is forced to side with and aid the rebels when his home is destroyed and
his loved ones are put in danger. Throughout the battles, Macias becomes hardened by war, which
eventually leads him into Villa's army as a general. Yet, his original gang of rebels and newly
recruited men begin to lose battle after battle. The soldiers go to war and some do not come back.
Written from the revolutionaries' point of view, The Underdogs, by Marino Azuela, is a historically
accurate novel that argues that the ideals of

Analysis Of The Movie ' Emiliano Zapata '
Emiliano Zapata has garnered a cult of personality that shares a common trait with myths from the
beginning of time in which people would create gods to worship and heroes to admire. Zapata was a
revolutionary during the Mexican Revolution who stands out as one of the most admirable figures in
Mexican history. From the state of Morelos near the city of Mexico, he started a practical movement
for land redistribution in his home state that transforms into an ideology of rebelling against bad
government and a true representation of the majority of Mexico. Zapata's myth by this time has
become ubiquitous in Mexico in which highways, streets, and a statue show how important he is and
is remember in Mexico. His myth had to arise from somewhere and in his case; he would become
popular mainly through the transformation of his ideal into something universal. The rise of Zapata
's myth would come about through the artists of corridos, murals, and movies all contributing to the
image of Zapata spreading it throughout Mexico and the United States.
Emiliano Zapata as a man would fight and die for the right of land ownership within his state of
Morelos, which is explained by the chaotic scene that was the Mexican Revolution. Francisco
Madero, a wealthy man that believed that Mexico needed a proper election, would start the
revolution from the idea that Mexico needs to remove Porfirio Diaz, in which many other
revolutionaries would arise either to contribute to violence or as a way to

Pancho Villa Thesis
Pancho Villa was many things, a lover, bandit, horse thief, cattle rustler, revolutionary leader,
murder or killer. His real name was José Doroteo Arango Arámbula, but he was better known by
Francisco Villa or his nickname Pancho Villa. He was one of the more well know Mexican
Revolutionary leaders. As a war general, he was the most prominent caudillo of the northern
Mexican state of Chihuahua. Pancho villa was the only guerilla warefare leader whose troops had
invaded United States soil successfully in the twentieth century. Villa had many resources due to the
size and location of Chihuahua. Location was important because of its proximity to the United
States of America. Pancho Villa was also Governor of Chihuahua in 1913 and 1914. After ... Show
After the raid on Columbus New, Mexico over one hundred Mexicans died and fifteen were tried by
jury and then hanged. During the court trials one of the revolutionary bandits said that he did not
have a choice but to join Pancho Villa. He said it was either Join him or watch his house burn. It is
said that Pancho Villa forced volunteers to ride with him on his journey and that he shot at the feet
of recruits indicating that they should go on. Though Pancho villa did have an army he did struggle
to find recruits. In 1916 he was desperate for recruits so he had to force some people to join him. It
is said that at least 480 or so, of the 500 men that he lead into the raid in Columbus New Mexico
were forced by to follow him. These were rough times for Pancho Villa and his men. They struggled
to eat and the clothes that they wore were pretty much rags. The revolutionary bandit that said that
"he didn't have a choice but to join" was named Jesus Paez. He was hurt in the raid and then a
couple years after it published a manuscript. The manuscript said in Spanish "después de villa quedó
ellos comenzó en su tarea asesina salió lo suficientemente lejos para estar fuera de peligro. Él
siempre montó un hermoso caballo, tenía buena ropa, y tenía un buen asiento. Sus hombres estaban
harapientos, hambrientos y sucios, y sus caballos eran y mulas estaban medio muertos de hambre y
tenía llagas en sus silla." This means "after villa got them started on their murderous task he
departed far enough away to be out of danger. He always rode a fine horse, had good clothes, and
had a fine saddle. His men were ragged, hungry, and dirty, and their horses were and mules were
half starved and had sores under their saddles" This manuscript was written two years after the raid
and it made Pancho Villa seem like a terrible person. This leaves some speculation about Pancho
Villa because if this was

Punitive Expedition in Mexico, 1916-1917 Essay
Introduction It is 9 March 1916, very early in the morning a big group of Mexican revolutionaries
loyal to Francisco (Pancho) Villa was heading towards the town of Columbus, NM. A raid was in the
works and the events that were about to take place in that border town were unknown by the
detachment of U.S. soldiers from the 13th Cavalry Regiment guarding the post.
History Just a year after the Mexican revolution started relations between Mexico and the United
States became tense after the resignation of the president Porfiro Diaz in 1911. The United States
was seeking opportunity to take advantage of Mexican oil and mineral resources. Mexico's problems
were not only associated with the United States. Great Britain and Germany had ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
However Pancho Villa made every effort to seize power. After losing several battles against
Carranza's forces, Pancho Villa retreated to the North.
Unconscious of this at the time, President Wilson adopted a policy of watchful waiting. United
States citizens living on the boundary with Mexico were worried that the government turned a blind
eye to property rights and lives of citizens were not being protected. Planning and Preparation
As a source of revenue an in retaliation for American support for Carranza, Villa began targeting
American interest in northern Mexico.2 Pancho Villa was accused of killing six–teen U.S. citizens
working in the mine industry in Mexico. They were escorted of the train they traveled, undressed
and shot on front of the train. All this actions forced President Wilson to take actions in the matter .
Execution/Action
In protest against the United States government's recognition of Venustiano Carranza by President
Wilson administration, Pancho Villa attacked on March 9, 1916 the town of Columbus, New
Mexico. During the raid set fire to several houses, looted shops, stole money from the bank and the
post office and telegraph, fought with the garrison of the square and killed eight soldiers and nine
civilians.3 That early morning on 9 March 1916, it was unclear how many revolutionaries from the
Pancho Villa participative in the raid of Columbus. Some claim five hundred, some thought there
one thousand. It was also

How Did Pancho Villa Change During The Mexican Revolution
Pancho Villa was a top military general of the Mexican Revolution. Pancho Villa was born Doroteo
Arange on June 5, 1878, in San Juan del Rio Durango. Villa spent much of his youth helping around
his parents' farm. After his father's death when Villa was only 15 years old, he became head of the
household.
With his new role as protector of his new household, he shot a man who was harassing one of his
sisters in 1894. He fled, spending 6 years on the run in the mountains. While there, he joined a group
of fugitives and became a bandit.
Although the specifics of what occurred in Villa's life during this time are unknown, it's confirmed
that he changed his name while on the run to avoid getting caught by the authorities. In the late
1890s, he worked ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
government then turned against Madero as well, fearing that the new president was too conciliatory
to the rebel group and concerned about the threat that civil war in Mexico was posing to American
business interests there. Tension reached a peak when yet another faction of rebel force, led by Felix
Diaz (the former dictator's nephew), clashed with federal troops in Mexico City under the command
of Victoriano Huerta. On February 18th, 1913, after the ninth day of that melee (known as La
Decena Tragica, or "the ten tragic days"), Huerta and Diaz met in the office of U.S. Ambassador
Henry Lane Wilson and signed the so–called "Pact of the Embassy," in which they agreed to
conspire against Madero and to install Huerta as president. Huerta assumed the presidency the
following day, after arresting Madero, who was assassinated a few days

Good Man Gone Wrong, By Fred Boalt: An Analysis
The relationship between the United States and Pancho Villa played a major role in the history of
Mexico. Both parties were involved in the Mexican Revolution, which lasted from 1910–1920, and
the relationship they had with one another significantly altered the course of the revolution. On
March 13, 1916, Fred Boalt wrote an article for the Tacoma Times newspaper, entitled Good Man
Gone Wrong, describing some details of the Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa and the
relationship he had with the United States. Boalt argues that the shift of relationship between the
United States and Villa ultimately led to Villa becoming a "Good Man Gone Wrong." In a sense,
Boalt tries to give a sympathetic view of Villa, by attributing his change in attitude to the United
States severing ties with him. The author of the article is writing from an American point of view, so
national biases can be a factor in his analysis of the US–Villa relationship. In this paper, I will seek
to answer the following questions: What kind of relationship did the United States have with Pancho
Villa, and how did this impact the Mexican Revolution? To properly understand the relationship ...
He describes some details of Villa's upbringing and the life he lived before being an active
revolutionary. He had a simple life as a farmer and did not come from a lot of money. However, he
had lofty ideas of caring for the poor and needy long before he ever became a leader in the
revolution. The author describes him as wanting to see lower–class Mexicans advancing in good
jobs and sending their kids to schools so they will not be illiterate. Boalt's article is a primary source
that tells a lot about the relationship between the United States and Pancho Villa and the impact their
actions had on the Mexican

The Mexican Revolution By Porfirio Diaz
Verdin, Ramon
Khan, Kamal
Santillan, Karen
Research Paper
The Mexican Revolution was brought on by tremendous disagreement among the Mexican people
over the dictatorship of President Porfirio I. Díaz. Diaz stayed in office for 34 years. During that
time, power was in the hands of only a few people. The people had no power to express their
opinions or select their public officials. Wealth was also in the hands of a few people. Porfirio
pushed peasants off of their lands and had business men take their land, they called the land
haciendas. The dictator–like rule of Porfirio I. Diaz and the want of land were the reason for fighting
in the Mexican Revolution.
The main "antagonist" of the Mexican revolution was Porfirio Diaz. Diaz became president of
Mexico in 1876. He was the autocrat who took full control of Mexico for 34 years. The revolutionist
wanted a democracy so they fought against his power. The political instability during this time was
also a major question in Mexico. Porfirio Diaz was very corrupt. He used his power as the president
to his advantage. The Mexican Constitution called for public election but Díaz and his supporters
used their political and economic resources to stay in power. He would often imprison his political
opponents or assassinate them just to keep his power over Mexico. This caused the citizens of
Mexico to increasingly oppose Porfirio Diaz and his regime.
Francisco I. Madero, a wealthy landowner and industrialist, was one of the strongest

The Mexican Revolution Of Mexico And The United States Essay
During the Mexican Revolution there were many prominent figures that emerged during the long
struggle. Some of the figures had a positive impact on the region, and some others a very negative
impact on the people of Mexico and their quest for an uncorrupted government. One figure that
stands out in the border region between Mexico and The United States during this time is General
Francisco "Pancho" Villa. To understand Pancho Villa's significant role during this uprising it is
important to understand who Villa was prior to the revolution, and what acts lead to his rise to
power.
Francisco "Pancho" Villa (born Doroteo Arango on June 5th, 1878) was known as a bandit prior to
his life as a Mexican General. Villa was born to sharecropper parents on a hacienda in San Juan Del
Rio, Durango, Mexico. After the death of his father, Villa only in his teens became the head of his
family. Villa soon found himself on the run from the law and the Haciendas owner after he shot the
man in the foot after an altercation over Villa's sister; this is what led to him initially becoming an
outlaw. While on the run as a fugitive Villa adapted other well known bandito ways of making
money including robbing haciendas, and sticking up wealthy mine owners, this is also when he
officially dropped Arango and only used Francisco "Pancho" Villa (Katz, 1998). Some bits of
folklore can be found when describing Villa's actions during this time period. There are tales of him
acting like a Robin

Pancho Villa and the Raid on Columbus, New Mexico
There were many conflicts that were more significant in terms of gains, losses, and casualties than
that of Villa's raid of Columbus, New Mexico. Upon hearing that the nearby town of Columbus,
New Mexico was lightly garrisoned, Mexican revolutionary Francisco "Pancho" Villa ordered what
remained of his army to attack the small farming town. His well–earned reputation had been
seriously damaged by this point considering recent losses that devastated his army, having both the
Mexican and American governments after him, and by crossing into the United States he
unknowingly made it certain that an end to his leadership within Mexico was inevitable. Why did
Villa cross the border to attack Columbus? President Woodrow Wilson's decision to ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Capitalist ventures prospered, particularly in the United States, while the poor citizens of Mexico
saw worsened living conditions. Villa joined with Francisco Ignacio Madero and his followers who
eventually defeats Díaz, forcing him into exile. When Madero chose Carranza (a Díaz supporter) to
be his Minister of War, Villa was outraged. Villa, along with General Victoriano Huerta, would start
a revolt against Madero. Huerta would later murder Madero and name himself President, Carranza
would ally himself with Villa to overthrow Huerta, and Carranza would become president after his
Plan of Guadalupe. Uncertainty was rampant following the assassination of Madero. The United
States government refused to recognize Huerta as Mexico's leader and demanded that public
elections be held to determine the next president and that Huerta not be included on the ballot.
Huerta was forced to resign and fled into exile. This left the door open for Carranza and his ally
Villa. Villa had gained huge popularity in Mexico and in the United States. President Wilson, in
speaking to the French ambassador, spoke highly of Villa and was convinced that he had the ability
to sway the public away from violence. "He would be incapable of ruling, but, if he wanted to, he
could very well re–establish order", Wilson said. Carranza and Villa's alliance fell out during the
campaign to oust Huerta. As Villa's forces moved thoroughly through

How Was Pancho Villa's Assassination Justified
Kimora Williams
Mr. Cheney
11.21.17
Assassination Paper
Pancho Villa, The Bandit
Pancho Villa was smart but tricky. Villa made a deal that in exchange for a quiet, humble life he
wouldn't join anything dealing with politics. Three years later, former president Venustiano Carranza
was assassinated by Obregon's agents. Obregon was a general in the Mexican Revolution, a
colleague of Carranza, and an enemy of Villa. With this assassination, Carranza appointed Obregon
to be President, but Villa ran as well. Obregon knew he had no chance against Villa, so Obregon
slayed him. Although Villa fought and got Mexico a better government, people were against his
efforts to be president and hated the fact that he wiped out a whole family, robbed killed, fought and
tortured people which makes Villa's assassination justified.
The Mexican Revolution took place in 1910. Many people were against the attempts to ... Show
Many people wished they were the killer, the killers did a lot just to kill him which shows how much
people hated. Villa fought in the to overrule the dictator, Porfirio Diaz. Diaz violated the Mexican
Constitution of 1857. Some people were with it, many were against it. With Villa being one of the
leaders of the Revolution, that automatically put an aim on his back. This is the situation that forced
Villa to stay out of politics and such. This was his turning point.
In conclusion, Villa fought to get Mexico a better government, people were against his efforts to be
president and hated the fact that he wiped out a whole family, robbed, killed, fought, and tortured
people which makes Villa's assassination justified. Villa was shot at 40 times which makes me think,
who would should at someone forty times if they were nice. He even managed to kill a whole family
except one and avoid people set out to kill him. Lastly, Villa was a bandit, he was bound to be either
in jail or

Taking a Look at the Mexican Revolution
The Mexican revolution was an important time in the history of Mexico. It was important because
Mexico stopped the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz and they established a constitutional republic.
During that time a lot of major people were involved in establishing a good government like
Francisco Madero, Pascual Orozco, Pancho villa, and Emiliano Zapata. All of these people had a
major role in the revolution and also in changing the future of Mexico. Each and everyone one of
them had an impact as revolutionists. The Mexican revolution began November 20, 1910, but the
question is why did it start in the first place? The Mexican revolution started because of the middle
class protesting against their dictator at that time which was Porfirio Diaz (1876–1911), Diazcame
into power like many other leaders in Mexico during the nineteenth century. Diaz was a former
army officer who came into power by a coup. The whole reason why the revolution started was
because Diaz was big on modernizing and industrializing but the workers were suffering because of
all the work. Diaz also wanted to form a stronger bond with the United States and started
distributing land which belonged to farmers and lower class people in Mexico, the only way to keep
your land or get it back was to have a legal document claiming that it was yours. When people
started turning on him he "bullied" them into supporting him.
The Mexican revolution started in 1910 when people started to challenge and question Diaz on his

Essay about Analysis of The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela
Analysis of The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela
In The Underdogs written by Mariano Azuela, we are introduced to a character that strongly
symbolizes the fuel of the Mexican Revolution. Heroes like Demetrio Macias brought the Serrano's
hope of giving them what they felt they truly deserved. Although Demetrio Macias, the general
(colonel) of a rebel army is hunting down the army of Pancho Villa, he seems to have the same
ideals as the enemy. In addition to Demetrio Macias, we meet women like Camilla and War Paint
who represent the different roles that women played during the Mexican Revolution.
The character of Demetrio Macias proves to be quite ironic. One facet of his character reveals his
determination to find Pancho Villa's army, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Demetrio plays the man who is full of power, and desires women and alcohol. He is even interested
in Luis Cervantes' soon to be wife, when he drunkenly fights everyone to get what he wants.
Demetrio is a man of power, and feels that he can achieve what he wants through force.
The people that Demetrio represent are evident in the people that comprise his army, as well as the
rare souls like Luis Cervantes. Cervantes, man who was well off to begin with, but later lost his
fortune to the government. He quotes "Before the revolution, I had my land all plowed, see, and just
right for sowing, and if it hadn't been for a little quarrel with Don Macio, the boss of my town,
Moyahua, I'd be there in a jiffy getting the oxen ready for the sowing, see?" (pg. 48) Luis Cervantes
explains his cause when he says "The triumph of our cause, which is the sublime triumph of Justice,
because our ideal–to be free the noble, long suffering people of Mexico–is about to be realized and
because those men who have watered the earth with their blood and tears will reap the harvest which
is rightfully theirs." (pg. 69)
With respect to the degradation of women in The Underdogs, we must profile the two women
portrayed in the book. On one hand we have the conservative Camilla, and on the other, we have
War Paint. War Paint was the opposite of what society held as the typical woman. War Paint went
against the grain, and partook in events which

Why Did The Mexican Revolution Start?
The Mexican Revolution, Where they killed the country 's longest serving president, 900,000 people
lost their lives, and nearly every major revolutionary leader was assassinated. "Poor Mexico" so far
from God and so close to the United States." A quote from the long serving leader, Porfirio Díaz.
DÍaz served a record, seven terms as president of Mexico, resulting in a total of three and a half
decades. How did Díaz serve such a long time? About 35 years to be exact. Well people say
"Mexican president Porfirio Díaz
is best known for establishing a strong centralized state during his term, but some say "Diaz reigned
using a campigne of bullying, intimidating citizen into supporting him." Also, people said "he was
seen as a weak ruler who failed to deliver on land reform promises made to Mexican citizens."
Why did the Mexican revolution start? The Mexican revolution may have consisted of the longest
serving serving president, but that is exactly what started the revolution in the first place and ending
in almost every revolutionary leader being assassinated and 900,000 people being killed. during this
long lasting revolution all started by Diaz. the long term president Diaz started off good as most
people may say, but ended up causing a revolution because of his manipulative long service. the
middle class was fed up and made a movement, in which started it all. The reason the middle class
was to the point of revoult was because Diaz created a stable political system that

Pancho Villa Research Paper
Pancho Villa was wanted because of all the crimes he has done in his life and was assassinated for
his mistakes. Pancho Villa was born on June 5th, 1878, in Rio Grande and he grew up and helped
his parents on the farm for awhile. After his father's death, he was the head of his house and he also
shot a man was who was harassing his sister. He tries to leave and hide, but he was found and he
was imprisoned. After that, he escaped and he became a bandit. While Pancho Villa was living as a
fugitive, he joined the Francisco Madero's successful uprising against the Mexican dictator. Also,
because of his skills as a fighter and also as a leader and he was made a colonel, but another
rebellion removed Madero from power in 1912. Villa was almost executed

The French and Mexican Revolutions Essay
What is a revolution? By definition it means the overthrow of a government by those who are
governed. That is exactly what the French and the Mexican revolutions were all about. The living
conditions and overall treatment of the poor, pheasants, lower class, last man on the totem pole or
what ever you want to call them, was a large factor in the coming of these revolutions. "Those who
are governed" are exactly what the lower class people were. Also, liberty was one of the people's
major concerns. They were ruled by men whose only desire was power and greed which is what led
them into revolt.
The treatment of the "majority", which was the lower class, had a significant role in each of these
revolutions. The French revolution was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The "majority" or "creoles" (Mexican born natives) as they were called, "out number all the others
ten to one." (Robinson, Fay) Yet they were treated the worst and, by the way, they were the ones
who paid most taxes. These lower class peoples were forced to barely survive on meager pay for
manual labor and menial jobs. Many of them ended up peddling or begging in the streets.
(Americana)
The men that drove these revolts were very determined to change their world. When Marquis de
Lafayette, a French noble, went to America and fought as a volunteer in the American Revolution,
he was inspired by their quest for liberty. He brought this inspiration home with him, and began the
French pursuit for freedom. In 1788 "absolute monarchy was collapsing... What would replace it?"
(Mckay, 706). The three estates would quarrel for the next few years about how to proceed. In the
end the National Assembly would form, vowing not to disband until a new constitution was born.
On August 27, 1789 the National Assembly (NA) issued the: Declaration of the rights of man. By
1790 the NA would hold the power of lawmaking. Although it did not last long, the idea was there
and it did bring about some type of reform. Unfortunately, Napoleon would reign and dictatorship
would once again reign in France.
The Mexican Revolution had much of the same results as did the French. Encouraged by both the
American

Theu.s. Mariano Azuela 's The Underdogs ( Los De Abajo )
Mexicans opened the twentieth century with the most drastic action that citizens can take against
their government: revolution. The open rebellion against the military dictator Porfirio Díaz began in
1910 and led to ten years of violent and destructive warfare within Mexico. When the fighting
finally ended, many Mexicans were disillusioned about the revolution as the small political and
economic changes that were finally implemented was not worth the senseless violence that wracked
Mexico. Mariano Azuela, in his novel The Underdogs (Los de abajo), examines this notable problem
of the Mexican Revolution through the narrative of a band of rebel soldiers. Their leader is a poor,
illiterate, Indian Demetrio Marcías, with his trusted aide the educated, city–boy, journalist Luis
Cervantes. As displayed in The Underdogs, the disillusionment with the revolution resulted from the
lack of a clear purpose for the fighting, a charismatic and powerful leader that could unify the
rebels, and the lack of major societal change resulting from it. The Mexican Revolution, unlike the
French or American Revolution, created disillusionment because there was never a common motive
for the various rebel factions to unify under and for average Mexicans to understand why a
revolution was necessary. This absence is a notable issue in Azuela's The Underdogs, where the lack
of purpose is evident in Marcías' band of rebels. After Luis Cervantes is captured by Marcías' men,
he introduces himself as a

Taking a Look at the Mexican Revolution
For 33 years according to its one political leader Mexico experienced different amounts of success
but this success didn't included "all" Mexicans which its majority were lower class citizens, on this
equation the majority of people were never the ones to gain; wealth and land inequalities and abuse
of power will part of the daily struggle, as result of this Mexican revolution will began.
In 1908, after a publication of an interview of Porfirio Diaz by James Creelman, sentiments of
Revolution began to spark in Mexico, but it wouldn't be until November 1910 when the Mexican
Revolution started. The revolutionary movement led by Francisco I. Madero would end 33 years of
corrupt dictatorship under General Porfirio Diaz, a mandate characterized by: inequalities in wealth
and land distribution, lack of political freedom, and human rights violations...such as slavery of
indigenous population in the name of modernity, among more social injustices to lower class
citizens.
Despite the inequalities, President Diaz' mandate was still characterized by Mexican economic
prosperity, brought primarily by foreign investors and their wealth. He promoted the modernization
of the mining industry and farm systems, built new rail roads to help communication and transport
of goods between cities, and modernization also touched cities with new stores and buildings that
emulated the ones on European cities. For the affluent Porfiriato was exactly what he promised
..."Order and Progress".
Regardless of

Dictatorship, Conspiracies, And Uprisings

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lisa Williams

More from Lisa Williams (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Dictatorship, Conspiracies, And Uprisings