SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Action Research „Differentiation group‟

Key research question

 How do you ensure that students build in differentiation
          into their own model of learning?

Main background research summary:

Research suggests that a good to outstanding lesson does not need
to do anything different in order to differentiate provided that
planning allows for:

• Multi-task learning
• Multi-sensory learning

      Our group is presently giving focus to differentiation in IL
Our group set IL providing students with 3 options

IL that we considered to be;

• Easy (Scaffold advice)
• Medium ( Bullet point advice)
• Hard (Open research question)

Crucially what we thought of as the degree of difficulty was not
revealed to the students.

This approach provided us with simple data illustrating the
percentage of students opted for Easy, Medium and Hard.

Thereafter a survey was carried out on one sample class with the
aim of trying to tease out reasons why students selected a
particular option.
In a survey the students were asked the following questions and it was
made clear that they had anonymity from their teacher!

Which option did you select and what were the reasons that motivated
you to make the choice?

Did you consider that one option was easier or more difficult?

If so, which option is the most difficult and which option is the easiest?

In the future would you like to have IL options and if so what factors would
influence you when making choices?

The survey data was then passed to Lesley who analysed the data and
extrapolated from the data the following conclusions…………..
Did the students agree with our views about which was easiest or hardest?
• Most students (15 out of 23) agreed option A looked easiest.
• Most students (15 out of 23) agreed option C looked hardest.

What did the students choose?
• 7 students chose option A (the “easy option” – scaffold advice)
• 5 chose option B (the “middle option” – bullet point advice)
• 11 chose option C (the “hard option” – open question)
Then it gets interesting: How did the students differentiate for themselves?
• 6 students chose the option they thought looked easiest (which wasn‟t
  always option A).
• 9 students chose the option they thought looked hardest (which wasn‟t
  always option C).
• 12 students - nearly half - say they chose the option they thought they
  could answer best.
• 10 students say they chose the option they were most interested in or
  would enjoy most.

Did students like having the choice?
• The majority of students (18 out of 23) said they liked differentiated IL and
  would like it again.

What next?
• Was the IL of better or worse quality than usual?
• Look at the reasons why students didn‟t want differentiated IL. How can
  we address these concerns?
• Try again with a different group, in a different subject

More Related Content

What's hot

Educational Research
Educational ResearchEducational Research
Educational Researchkjoseph84
 
What Are Incentives And How Do They Work
What Are Incentives And How Do They WorkWhat Are Incentives And How Do They Work
What Are Incentives And How Do They WorkChrissy Jones-White
 
Formative assessment
Formative assessmentFormative assessment
Formative assessmentmrosborn
 
PowerPoint APA-style
PowerPoint APA-stylePowerPoint APA-style
PowerPoint APA-styleZak Garofolo
 
Appie session,April,2014, Rupert
Appie session,April,2014, RupertAppie session,April,2014, Rupert
Appie session,April,2014, RupertFaye Brownlie
 
Characterictics of intelligent behavior
Characterictics of intelligent behaviorCharacterictics of intelligent behavior
Characterictics of intelligent behaviormoss22
 
Typology of questions
Typology of questionsTypology of questions
Typology of questionsshaziazamir1
 
Pre-assessment
Pre-assessmentPre-assessment
Pre-assessmenthmwagner
 
Day 3 8 14 skills strand
Day 3 8 14 skills strandDay 3 8 14 skills strand
Day 3 8 14 skills strand1831160
 
Ivie barth slideshare assignment
Ivie barth slideshare assignmentIvie barth slideshare assignment
Ivie barth slideshare assignmentjlivie918
 
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical School
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical SchoolExploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical School
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical Schooltbirdcymru
 
Clickers and active engagement sociology - jeff loats
Clickers and active engagement   sociology - jeff loatsClickers and active engagement   sociology - jeff loats
Clickers and active engagement sociology - jeff loatsJeff Loats
 

What's hot (18)

Educational Research
Educational ResearchEducational Research
Educational Research
 
Essential questions
Essential questionsEssential questions
Essential questions
 
What Are Incentives And How Do They Work
What Are Incentives And How Do They WorkWhat Are Incentives And How Do They Work
What Are Incentives And How Do They Work
 
Formative assessment
Formative assessmentFormative assessment
Formative assessment
 
Peer review in the formative stage of writing
Peer review in the formative stage of writingPeer review in the formative stage of writing
Peer review in the formative stage of writing
 
Chapter 7.2
Chapter 7.2Chapter 7.2
Chapter 7.2
 
PowerPoint APA-style
PowerPoint APA-stylePowerPoint APA-style
PowerPoint APA-style
 
Appie session,April,2014, Rupert
Appie session,April,2014, RupertAppie session,April,2014, Rupert
Appie session,April,2014, Rupert
 
Characterictics of intelligent behavior
Characterictics of intelligent behaviorCharacterictics of intelligent behavior
Characterictics of intelligent behavior
 
Typology of questions
Typology of questionsTypology of questions
Typology of questions
 
Carp Presentation
Carp PresentationCarp Presentation
Carp Presentation
 
Pre-assessment
Pre-assessmentPre-assessment
Pre-assessment
 
Day 3 8 14 skills strand
Day 3 8 14 skills strandDay 3 8 14 skills strand
Day 3 8 14 skills strand
 
Ivie barth slideshare assignment
Ivie barth slideshare assignmentIvie barth slideshare assignment
Ivie barth slideshare assignment
 
Basics of Writing Good Assessments
Basics of Writing Good AssessmentsBasics of Writing Good Assessments
Basics of Writing Good Assessments
 
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical School
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical SchoolExploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical School
Exploring formative assessment in Leicester Medical School
 
Clickers and active engagement sociology - jeff loats
Clickers and active engagement   sociology - jeff loatsClickers and active engagement   sociology - jeff loats
Clickers and active engagement sociology - jeff loats
 
EAA: Ashley Higgins Classroom
EAA: Ashley Higgins ClassroomEAA: Ashley Higgins Classroom
EAA: Ashley Higgins Classroom
 

Viewers also liked

Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013
Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013
Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013Vici Macleod
 
Skill will
Skill will Skill will
Skill will kirkmel
 
Fruit basket
Fruit basketFruit basket
Fruit basketkagome
 
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy intro
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy introCove Assistant Head - Pedagogy intro
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy introkirkmel
 
Title & intro
Title & introTitle & intro
Title & introkirkmel
 
T&L Venn diagram
T&L Venn diagramT&L Venn diagram
T&L Venn diagramkirkmel
 
Cove AH interview intro
Cove AH interview introCove AH interview intro
Cove AH interview introkirkmel
 
About toon town
About toon townAbout toon town
About toon townkagome
 
Yr8info eve for mahara
Yr8info eve for maharaYr8info eve for mahara
Yr8info eve for maharakirkmel
 
Title & intro
Title & introTitle & intro
Title & introkirkmel
 
To kill a mockingbird background
To kill a mockingbird backgroundTo kill a mockingbird background
To kill a mockingbird backgroundscmullertriton
 
Cats & dogs
Cats & dogsCats & dogs
Cats & dogskagome
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013
Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013
Rcpm path to opportunities april 2013
 
Skill will
Skill will Skill will
Skill will
 
Fruit basket
Fruit basketFruit basket
Fruit basket
 
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy intro
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy introCove Assistant Head - Pedagogy intro
Cove Assistant Head - Pedagogy intro
 
Title & intro
Title & introTitle & intro
Title & intro
 
T&L Venn diagram
T&L Venn diagramT&L Venn diagram
T&L Venn diagram
 
Benefits at-a-Glance-2013
Benefits at-a-Glance-2013Benefits at-a-Glance-2013
Benefits at-a-Glance-2013
 
Cove AH interview intro
Cove AH interview introCove AH interview intro
Cove AH interview intro
 
About toon town
About toon townAbout toon town
About toon town
 
Yr8info eve for mahara
Yr8info eve for maharaYr8info eve for mahara
Yr8info eve for mahara
 
Examen 6to
Examen 6toExamen 6to
Examen 6to
 
Title & intro
Title & introTitle & intro
Title & intro
 
To kill a mockingbird background
To kill a mockingbird backgroundTo kill a mockingbird background
To kill a mockingbird background
 
Cats & dogs
Cats & dogsCats & dogs
Cats & dogs
 
Punctuating dialogue
Punctuating dialoguePunctuating dialogue
Punctuating dialogue
 

Similar to Ar hub cpd presentation extra

Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)
Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)
Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)jenniferjoelle
 
Best practices for running peer instruction
Best practices for running peer instructionBest practices for running peer instruction
Best practices for running peer instructionPeter Newbury
 
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptx
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptxLesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptx
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptxJessaBejer1
 
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice Questions
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice QuestionsAssessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice Questions
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice QuestionsSimar Neasy
 
First Hand Learning: Group 1
First Hand Learning: Group 1First Hand Learning: Group 1
First Hand Learning: Group 1lmk7309
 
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SEND
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SENDresearchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SEND
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SENDGary Jones
 
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions Rebecca Joseph
 
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5tommygee2
 
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...Matthew Prost
 
Social psychology research report
Social psychology research reportSocial psychology research report
Social psychology research reportArthur Wilson
 
Social psychology research report
Social psychology research reportSocial psychology research report
Social psychology research reportiManySusu
 
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docxfredharris32
 
Thought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsThought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsCameron Paterson
 
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2Vo Linh Truong
 
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docxYour nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docxdanielfoster65629
 
Thought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsThought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsCameron Paterson
 
Dissertation defense ppt
Dissertation defense ppt Dissertation defense ppt
Dissertation defense ppt Dr. James Lake
 

Similar to Ar hub cpd presentation extra (20)

Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)
Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)
Project-Based Learning for Theory of Knowledge (TOK)
 
Best practices for running peer instruction
Best practices for running peer instructionBest practices for running peer instruction
Best practices for running peer instruction
 
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptx
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptxLesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptx
Lesson - Questionnaire in Research Study.pptx
 
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice Questions
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice QuestionsAssessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice Questions
Assessment For Learning Using Multiple Choice Questions
 
Essential questions
Essential questionsEssential questions
Essential questions
 
First Hand Learning: Group 1
First Hand Learning: Group 1First Hand Learning: Group 1
First Hand Learning: Group 1
 
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SEND
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SENDresearchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SEND
researchED London 2018 - Evidence-based practice and SEND
 
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions
Truly Insightful: The Multiple Uses of the UC Personal Insight Questions
 
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5
Presentation5 satisfactionsurvey from EDU 652 Week 5
 
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
 
Ldhen 2010
Ldhen 2010Ldhen 2010
Ldhen 2010
 
Social psychology research report
Social psychology research reportSocial psychology research report
Social psychology research report
 
Social psychology research report
Social psychology research reportSocial psychology research report
Social psychology research report
 
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx
8 PEER RESPONSES DUE IN 20 HOURSFLYER DISCUSSIONGuided.docx
 
Thought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsThought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking Questions
 
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2
Learning and Teaching Style - Day 2
 
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docxYour nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
 
Thought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking QuestionsThought-Provoking Questions
Thought-Provoking Questions
 
Dissertation defense ppt
Dissertation defense ppt Dissertation defense ppt
Dissertation defense ppt
 
Survey research
Survey researchSurvey research
Survey research
 

Ar hub cpd presentation extra

  • 1. Action Research „Differentiation group‟ Key research question How do you ensure that students build in differentiation into their own model of learning? Main background research summary: Research suggests that a good to outstanding lesson does not need to do anything different in order to differentiate provided that planning allows for: • Multi-task learning • Multi-sensory learning Our group is presently giving focus to differentiation in IL
  • 2. Our group set IL providing students with 3 options IL that we considered to be; • Easy (Scaffold advice) • Medium ( Bullet point advice) • Hard (Open research question) Crucially what we thought of as the degree of difficulty was not revealed to the students. This approach provided us with simple data illustrating the percentage of students opted for Easy, Medium and Hard. Thereafter a survey was carried out on one sample class with the aim of trying to tease out reasons why students selected a particular option.
  • 3. In a survey the students were asked the following questions and it was made clear that they had anonymity from their teacher! Which option did you select and what were the reasons that motivated you to make the choice? Did you consider that one option was easier or more difficult? If so, which option is the most difficult and which option is the easiest? In the future would you like to have IL options and if so what factors would influence you when making choices? The survey data was then passed to Lesley who analysed the data and extrapolated from the data the following conclusions…………..
  • 4. Did the students agree with our views about which was easiest or hardest? • Most students (15 out of 23) agreed option A looked easiest. • Most students (15 out of 23) agreed option C looked hardest. What did the students choose? • 7 students chose option A (the “easy option” – scaffold advice) • 5 chose option B (the “middle option” – bullet point advice) • 11 chose option C (the “hard option” – open question)
  • 5. Then it gets interesting: How did the students differentiate for themselves? • 6 students chose the option they thought looked easiest (which wasn‟t always option A). • 9 students chose the option they thought looked hardest (which wasn‟t always option C). • 12 students - nearly half - say they chose the option they thought they could answer best. • 10 students say they chose the option they were most interested in or would enjoy most. Did students like having the choice? • The majority of students (18 out of 23) said they liked differentiated IL and would like it again. What next? • Was the IL of better or worse quality than usual? • Look at the reasons why students didn‟t want differentiated IL. How can we address these concerns? • Try again with a different group, in a different subject