The document provides instructions for an assignment requiring an initial post and follow up post discussing the pros and cons of vague language in the US Constitution. The initial post must cite at least one scholarly source in addition to assigned readings, and pick a vague portion of the Constitution to analyze regarding whether the vagueness has been problematic or helpful using historical examples. The follow up post must respond to a peer or instructor, further the discussion with more information and a citation, which can include assigned readings or an additional scholarly source. Both posts are due by Tuesday night and must follow APA format.
1. Required Resources
Textbook: Chapters 4, 5
Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
Initial Post Instructions
Why is our Constitution vague? What are the pros and cons of
having a constitution that is written vaguely? Pick a "vague'
portion of the US Constitution. Has this vagueness in
terminology been problematic or helpful? Provide historical
examples. Use evidence (cite sources) to support your response
from assigned readings or online lessons,
and
at least one outside scholarly source.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to one peer or the instructor. Further the dialogue by
providing more information and clarification. Minimum of 1
scholarly source which can include your textbook or assigned
readings or may be from your additional scholarly research.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons
and
an outside scholarly source)
2. APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Due Date for Initial Post: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday
