Wing-THiiiNksail© patent Improved Flettner Rotor performance by 50% or more Improved upwind performance from 40° to 25° Improved equals improved IRR Safety at Sea for explosive cargos and Tanker operations

1. Hybrid Fuel play
Super Eco & Medium Speed
Wind Power, the Future of the Ocean

2. Customers / Market Ship
owners /Charters
Hybrid Evolution
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= THiiiNK offers?
We reduce opera7ng
cost by up to 50%
Industrial supply chain
and global veAng
procedures
Value proposi7on
25-40 % + p.a. ROI
We reduce emission
pollu7on by up to 50%
A proven technology
with patented
improvements
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

3. Customers / Market Ship
owners /Charters
Hybrid Evolution
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= THiiiNK offers?
We reduce opera7ng
cost by up to 50%
Industrial supply chain
and global veAng
procedures
Value proposi7on
25-40 % + p.a. ROI
We reduce emission
pollu7on by up to 50%
A proven technology
with patented
improvements
New enforced Regulations will increase fuel price by up to 300%!
LONDON, Oct 27 (Reuters) – The United Nations’ shipping agency set global regulations on
Thursday to limit the amount of sulfur emissions from vessels and said they would come into
force from 2020.
A session of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Marine Environment Protection
Committee in London set the new requirements, which will see sulfur emissions fall from the
current maximum of 3.5 percent of fuel content to 0.5 percent.
The move will add extra costs to the shipping industry at a time when parts of it are going
through their worst ever downturn. Analysts estimate the additional costs for the container
shipping sector alone could be $35-$40 billion.
And some also questioned whether refiners would undertake lengthy and costly investments
to produce lower sulfur fuel, and so whether there would be enough produced to meet
demand.
Environmental groups welcomed the outcome,
as well as the 2020 start date. The IMO had
considered the option of delaying introduction of
the regulations until 2025.
“This is a landmark decision and we are very
pleased that the world has bitten the bullet and is
now tackling poisonous sulphuric fuel in 2020,”
said Bill Hemmings of campaigner Transport &
Environment.
“This decision reduces the contribution of
shipping to the world’s air pollution impact from
about 5 percent down to 1.5 percent and will
save millions of lives in the coming decades.”
The shipping industry is among the world’s
biggest sulfur emitters, with sulfur oxide content
in heavy fuel oil up to 3,500 times higher than
the latest European diesel standards for
vehicles.
IMO Sets Regulations to Cut Sulphur Emissions by Ships from 2020
October 27, 2016 by Reuters
About 90 percent of world trade is transported
by sea.“There will be much to do between now
and 2020 to ensure that sufficient quantities of
compliant marine fuel of the right quality will
indeed be available, and that this radical switch
over to cleaner fuels will be implemented
smoothly … without distorting shipping markets
or having negative impacts on the movement of
world trade,” said Simon Bennett, director of
policy and external relations with the
International Chamber of Shipping association,
which also welcomed what it said was the clear
decision by IMO member states on the 2020
date. Switzerland-based MSC, the world’s No.2
container line, estimated its own additional
annual fuel costs at $2.02 billion. The group
said it had invested in energy and
environmental protection in recent years.
.
Refiners will also be affected. Around 3 million
barrels per day of high-sulfur fuel oil go into
bunker fuel for ships, and most of that will be
replaced with lower-sulfur distillates.
“The big thing that is unknown is the
implementation roadmap. That will determine
how disruptive this is going to be,” said Alan
Gelder, head of refining research with energy
consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
“The refineries will need to run in a way they
have never run before.”
Refineries that do not have the ability to convert
the fuel oil into higher quality products will
struggle to remain profitable as this big outlet
for lower-quality fuel disappears.
“Refiners will not invest to de-sulphurise fuel oil
and there is not enough low-sulfur fuel oil to
meet demand from the shipping sector
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Enforced Clean Fuel Regulations might increase fuel price up-to 300%?
LONDON, Oct 27 (Reuters) – The United Nations’ shipping agency set global regulations on
Thursday to limit the amount of sulfur emissions from vessels and said they would come into
force from 2020.
A session of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Marine Environment Protection
Committee in London set the new requirements, which will see sulfur emissions fall from the
current maximum of 3.5 percent of fuel content to 0.5 percent.
The move will add extra costs to the shipping industry at a time when parts of it are going
through their worst ever downturn. Analysts estimate the additional costs for the container
shipping sector alone could be $35-$40 billion.
And some also questioned whether refiners would undertake lengthy and costly investments
to produce lower sulfur fuel, and so whether there would be enough produced to meet
demand.
Environmental groups welcomed the outcome,
as well as the 2020 start date. The IMO had
considered the option of delaying introduction of
the regulations until 2025.
“This is a landmark decision and we are very
pleased that the world has bitten the bullet and
is now tackling poisonous sulphuric fuel in
2020,” said Bill Hemmings of campaigner
Transport & Environment.
“This decision reduces the contribution of
shipping to the world’s air pollution impact from
about 5 percent down to 1.5 percent and will
save millions of lives in the coming decades.”
The shipping industry is among the world’s
biggest sulfur emitters, with sulfur oxide content
in heavy fuel oil up to 3,500 times higher than
the latest European diesel standards for
vehicles.
IMO Sets Regulations to Cut Sulphur Emissions by Ships from 2020
October 27, 2016 by Reuters
About 90 percent of world trade is transported
by sea.“There will be much to do between now
and 2020 to ensure that sufficient quantities of
compliant marine fuel of the right quality will
indeed be available, and that this radical switch
over to cleaner fuels will be implemented
smoothly … without distorting shipping markets
or having negative impacts on the movement of
world trade,” said Simon Bennett, director of
policy and external relations with the
International Chamber of Shipping association,
which also welcomed what it said was the clear
decision by IMO member states on the 2020
date. Switzerland-based MSC, the world’s No.2
container line, estimated its own additional
annual fuel costs at $2.02 billion. The group
said it had invested in energy and
environmental protection in recent years.
.
Refiners will also be affected. Around 3 million
barrels per day of high-sulfur fuel oil go into
bunker fuel for ships, and most of that will be
replaced with lower-sulfur distillates.
“The big thing that is unknown is the
implementation roadmap. That will determine
how disruptive this is going to be,” said Alan
Gelder, head of refining research with energy
consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
“The refineries will need to run in a way they
have never run before.”
Refineries that do not have the ability to
convert the fuel oil into higher quality products
will struggle to remain profitable as this big
outlet for lower-quality fuel disappears.
“Refiners will not invest to de-sulphurise fuel oil
and there is not enough low-sulfur fuel oil to
meet demand from the shipping sector

4. Customers / Market Ship
owners /Charters
Hybrid Evolution
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= THiiiNK offers?
We reduce opera7ng
cost by up to 50%
Industrial supply chain
and global veAng
procedures
Value proposi7on
25-40 % + p.a. ROI
We reduce emission
pollu7on by up to 50%
A proven technology
with patented
improvements
New enforced Regulations will increase fuel price by up to 300%!
LONDON, Oct 27 (Reuters) – The United Nations’ shipping agency set global regulations on
Thursday to limit the amount of sulfur emissions from vessels and said they would come into
force from 2020.
A session of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Marine Environment Protection
Committee in London set the new requirements, which will see sulfur emissions fall from the
current maximum of 3.5 percent of fuel content to 0.5 percent.
The move will add extra costs to the shipping industry at a time when parts of it are going
through their worst ever downturn. Analysts estimate the additional costs for the container
shipping sector alone could be $35-$40 billion.
And some also questioned whether refiners would undertake lengthy and costly investments
to produce lower sulfur fuel, and so whether there would be enough produced to meet
demand.
Environmental groups welcomed the outcome,
as well as the 2020 start date. The IMO had
considered the option of delaying introduction of
the regulations until 2025.
“This is a landmark decision and we are very
pleased that the world has bitten the bullet and is
now tackling poisonous sulphuric fuel in 2020,”
said Bill Hemmings of campaigner Transport &
Environment.
“This decision reduces the contribution of
shipping to the world’s air pollution impact from
about 5 percent down to 1.5 percent and will
save millions of lives in the coming decades.”
The shipping industry is among the world’s
biggest sulfur emitters, with sulfur oxide content
in heavy fuel oil up to 3,500 times higher than
the latest European diesel standards for
vehicles.
IMO Sets Regulations to Cut Sulphur Emissions by Ships from 2020
October 27, 2016 by Reuters
About 90 percent of world trade is transported
by sea.“There will be much to do between now
and 2020 to ensure that sufficient quantities of
compliant marine fuel of the right quality will
indeed be available, and that this radical switch
over to cleaner fuels will be implemented
smoothly … without distorting shipping markets
or having negative impacts on the movement of
world trade,” said Simon Bennett, director of
policy and external relations with the
International Chamber of Shipping association,
which also welcomed what it said was the clear
decision by IMO member states on the 2020
date. Switzerland-based MSC, the world’s No.2
container line, estimated its own additional
annual fuel costs at $2.02 billion. The group
said it had invested in energy and
environmental protection in recent years.
.
Refiners will also be affected. Around 3 million
barrels per day of high-sulfur fuel oil go into
bunker fuel for ships, and most of that will be
replaced with lower-sulfur distillates.
“The big thing that is unknown is the
implementation roadmap. That will determine
how disruptive this is going to be,” said Alan
Gelder, head of refining research with energy
consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
“The refineries will need to run in a way they
have never run before.”
Refineries that do not have the ability to convert
the fuel oil into higher quality products will
struggle to remain profitable as this big outlet
for lower-quality fuel disappears.
“Refiners will not invest to de-sulphurise fuel oil
and there is not enough low-sulfur fuel oil to
meet demand from the shipping sector
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Enforced Co2 Regulations 40% reduction by 2030, 50% - 70% by 2050.”
ICS Applauds 'Paris Agreement for Shipping’ (Co2 Reduction).”
Apr 13, 2018
Apr 13, 2018: ICS Applauds ‘Paris Agreement for Shipping’( Co2 Reduction).”
The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) has welcomed the high level strategy for the
further reduction of shipping’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, adopted on 13 April by
the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO).
ICS Secretary General, Peter Hinchliffe said “This is a ground breaking agreement – a
Paris Agreement for shipping – that sets a very high level of ambition for the future
reduction of CO2 emissions. We are confident this will give the shipping industry the clear
signal it needs to get on with the job of developing zero CO2 fuels, so that the entire sector
will be in a position to decarbonise completely, consistent with the 1.5 degree climate
change goal.”
He added “The agreed IMO objective of cutting the sector’s total GHG
emissions by at least 50% before 2050, as part of a continuing pathway for
further reduction, is very ambitious indeed, especially when account is taken of
current projections for trade growth as the world’s population and levels of
prosperity continue to increase.”
ICS acknowledges that some governments would have preferred to see the
adoption of even more aggressive targets, but argues that a 50% total cut by
2050 can realistically only be achieved with the development and very
widespread use of zero CO2 fuels. ICS believes that if this 50% goal is
successfully met, the wholesale switch by the industry to zero CO2 fuels should
therefore follow very swiftly afterwards.
ICS says that the efficiency goal that has been agreed by IMO Member States
for the sector as a whole – a 40% improvement by 2030, compared to 2008, and
a 50-70% improvement by 2050 – is also extremely ambitious but probably
achievable. But only if governments recognise the enormity of this challenge
and facilitate the rapid development of new technologies and fuels.
Mr Hinchliffe remarked that “The industry is very encouraged by the willingness
of governments, on all sides of the debate, to co-operate and move to a position
that demonstrates unequivocally that IMO is the only body that can meaningfully
address the CO2 emissions of international shipping.”
ICS says it hopes the IMO agreement will be sufficient to discourage those who mistakenly
advocate regional measures which, as well being very damaging to global trade, would not
be effective in helping the international shipping sector to further reduce its total CO2
emissions, which are currently about 8% lower than in 2008 despite a 30% increase in
maritime trade.
As a result of the IMO agreement, ICS now expects discussions at IMO to begin in earnest
on the development of additional CO2 reduction measures, including those to be
implemented before 2023.
ICS says that the shipping industry will continue to participate constructively in these
important discussions.

6. Hybrid Evolution = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 60% Super Eco Speed
2014 - Portrait of the “Hybrid” car XL1C in Germany!
XL1 represents the third evolutionary stage
of Volkswagen’s 1-liter car strategy, referring
to the goal set by Prof. Dr. Ferdinand Piëch
—currently Chairman of the Supervisory
Board of Volkswagen AG—more than 10
years ago to produce a practical car that
had a combined fuel consumption of one
liter per 100 km (235 mpg).
XL1C
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

7. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrail innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25 - 50%!
1880 - Portrait of the “Hybrid” sail steamer SUNBAWA in the Chinese Sea!
SUNBAWA represents the third
evolutionary stage of shipping’s
propulsion history, referring to the
Paddle, Sail and Engine more than
134 years ago to produce a
practical vessel that had a reduced
fuel consumption of 50% to 100%
by combining Wind and Main engine
creating a true hybrid.
SUNBAWA
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

8. The Ancient Code
= Hull Area by x 3.0 / 4.0 = Sail Area = 100% Propulsion
240 length M x 25 depth M
6000 Square M x 3.0
18,000 Square M Sail Area
=
=
Cutty Sark Aframax tanker: 80-115,000 tonnes deadweight 25% to 50% savings
Maltese Falcon with DynaRig Sail system Aframax tanker with 3 X 6000 sq. DynaRig Sail system

9. Hybrid Evolution is history = Wind-Powered Rotor Ships Were
the Maritime Breakthrough of the 20s: Time Machine
(March 1925) = intelligent industrial innovation
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
1925 - Portrait & Postcard of / from the “Hybrid” Rotor Steamer BUCKAU in POPULAR MECHANICS!
BUCKAU represented the Maritime
Breakthrough of the 20s: the fourth
evolutionary stage of shipping’s
propulsion history, referring to the Wind
Power and Engine more than 85 years
ago to produce a practical vessel that
had a reduced fuel consumption of 50%
to 100% by combining Wind and Main
engine creating a true hybrid
The first Flettner prototypes proved that
the drive functioned reliably, BUCKAU
served as a normal freighter in the
Atlantic between 1924 and 1929
BUCKAU
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

10. 13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Lift Coefficient
Progress 1924 to 2017: why 4 or 2 Rotors if you can do it with 2 or 1?
Hybrid Evolution THiiiNK intelligent industrail innovation
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= Reduce Sail Area by a Factor x 10+
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

11. THiiiNKSail©
Hybrid Evolution why 4 or 2 Rotors if you can do it with 2 or 1?
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= THiiiNK offers new patented innovations that improve rotor and vessel performance
With flap
= increased force
since no turbulent air
Without flap
= turbulent air in
rotor wake
THiiiNksail© patented system can be fitted quay side on a vessel within a 2 week docking cycle!
Wing-THiiiNksail© patent
Improved Rotor performance by
50% or more
Improved upwind performance
from 40° to 25°
Improved equals improved IRR
Foldable- THiiiNksail© patent
Folding the flettner rotors eases
maintenance and the number of
ports and routes the vessel can
maintain
50% more
performance
Better IRR
more flexibility
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Folded rotor deck clearance 3 meters”Full De-icing
LR2 tanker installation of 2 rotors weighs Ca 600 ton
Note: TS820 dose not use highly flammable composite, highly susceptible to failure due to Lightning strikes."

12. 1. The (Full Size) Main Engine =
Safety
Catch the Wind
Keeping Time
= Keep You Off Rock, Beach Or Bottom
= Steaming Into Sailing Position
= Steaming To Keep Time
2. The Control, Navigation and Weather Routing
Safety
Catch the Wind
Keeping Time
= Steaming Into Sailing Position
= Keep You Off Rock, Beach Or Bottom
= Sailing and Steaming To Keep Time
3. A Vessel From The “Existing” Fleet?
Coastal Tanker (205 m)
Aframax (245 m)
Suez-Max (285 m)
VLCC (330 m)
Hybrid Wind Power = Safety at Sea
The Three Most Important Things for Hybrid Wind Power!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

13. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
1929 - Portrait of the “Hybrid” Rotor Steamer BARBARA in the Mediterranean!
BARBARA represents the fourth
evolutionary stage of shipping’s propulsion
history, referring to the Wind Power and
Engine more than 85 years ago to produce
a practical vessel that had a reduced fuel
consumption of 25% to 50% by combining
Wind and Main engine creating a true hybrid
The two Flettner prototypes proved that the
drive functioned reliably, BARBARA served
as a normal freighter in the Mediterranean
between 1926 and 1929
BARBARA
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

14. Hybrid Evolution = Using 5 existing things!
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= Main Hybrid Components Shipping!
Existing Vessel
Existing Main Engine
Existing
Wind Propulsion
Existing
Crew
Existing Navigation & Control
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Hybrid Wind Power = Safety at Sea using existing technologies!

15. Hybrid Investment Fuel Play 25% +++ savings
Medium Speed 8000 ton per year
= Co2 + SOx + NOx & PM & 25 years = Total Cost to the Environment?
AFRAMAX MID
Environment & Co2
Fuel
3.7
Co2 1yr
25 years
=
=
=
50,000 tons
1 t fuel = 3.7 t Co2
7,400 tons
185,700 Ton Co2
+
x
=
T
Hybrid Rig Investment Cost
+ SAVE 25%+ savings
$5 M / $10M
“All pricing is subject to change THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG”WWW.THiiiNK.COM
- Co2 Reduction 185,000 tons
- SOx, NOx & PM Reduction
Equaling 10.5 Billion cars
SAVINGS Medium
NOTE: with routing optimization up to 50% + savings are technically possible!

16. Hybrid Evolution = Using 5 existing things!
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= Control and Route optimisation systems!
Main Engine
TS820 Propulsion
Existing Navigation & Rotor Control system, backed by the most Comprehensive route optimization
toll to date, for accurate Flettner performance and system control in all conditions.
Important factors, the calculation of sea-margin and potential of route optimisation for a Flettner
assisted system, lead to a better understanding, how to make the most profit out of a Flettner rotor
system, are included in the system.
The Control and Route optimisation systems, are backed up by one of the most sophisticated
measurement systems ever installed on a vessel.
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

17. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

18. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
2008 - Picture of the “Hybrid” Rotor ship E-SHIP on it’s way to Brazil!
E-SHIP1 represents the fifth evolutionary
stage of shipping’s propulsion history,
referring to the Wind Power and Engine from
more than 85 years ago to produce a
practical vessel that had a reduced fuel
consumption of 15% to 30% by combining
Wind and Main engine creating a true hybrid
The third Flettner prototype proved that the
drive functioned reliably, E-SHIP1 IS serving
as a normal freighter all over the world
between 2008 till this date 2018 and for
many years to come..
E-SHIP1
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

19. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Safety at Sea for explosive cargos Tanker operations
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Enercon with huge in-house expertise in composites, dose not use a
composite rotor on EShip1, for the following reasons:
A Flettner rotor has to withstand 4 times the number of load alternations
compared to a rotor-blade.
Accidents Statistics with composite wind power plants:
2011- 2016: 140 blade failure due to lighting strikes and other composite
failures, with several cases with replacement of complete series of
blades!
111 fires 2011 - 2016, clearly show, all the advantages
of composites are gone, due to fire compared to steel or aluminume,
once the fire starts its unstoppable by normal means!
The only FLETTNER accident recorded in 93 years of operation, was a
composite rotor Bulker installation, the systems was torn of the deck
during a storm full Night!

20. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Safety at Sea for explosive cargos Tanker operations
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Accidents Statistics with composite wind power plants:
2011- 2016: 140 blade failures due to lighting strikes and other
composite failures, with several cases with replacement of complete
series of blades!
111 fires 2011 - 2016, clearly show, all the advantages
of composites are gone, due to fire compared to steel or aluminum,
once the fire starts its unstoppable by normal means!
2011-2016:140 blade failures, including 111 fires Show, using
Composites are a No-Go”for SAFE Tanker operations!
Only EShip1 rotors of steel aluminum equal Safety at Sea!
See full accident report composite Wind-Turbines!
http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/fullaccidents.pdf
WIND TURBINE ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT COMPILATION
Last updated at 30/09/2016 Compiled by CWIF
Accident type Date Site/area State/Country Turbine type Details Info source Web reference/link Alternate web reference/link
1 Fatal 30/11/1980 Choteau, near Conrad,
MT
USA 2kw Tim McCartney, fall from tower while removing small
turbine. Body found near tower.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
2 Fatal 30/12/1981 Boulevard, CA USA 40kw Terry Mehrkam, atop nacelle, run-away rotor, no
lanyard, fell from tower.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
3 Structural failure 1981 Denmark Denmark 250 Turbines exposed to wind speeds of 35 m/sec for
10 min resulted in 9 failures and 30% damaged
Safety of Wind Systems, M Ragheb,
3/12/2009
4 Fatal 1982 Bushland, TX USA 40kw Pat Acker, 28, rebar cage for foundation came in
contact with overhead power lines, electrocuted.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
5 Fatal 1982 Denmark 50kw Jens Erik Madsen, during servicing of controller,
electrocuted.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
6 Fatal 1983 Palm Springs, CA USA 500kw Eric Wright on experimental VAWT - tower collapsed
while he was on it.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
7 Fatal 1984 Altamont Pass, CA USA 65kw J.A. Doucette, unloading towers from a truck, towers
rolled off truck, crushing him.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
8 Fatal 1984 Palm Springs, CA USA 80kw Art Gomez, servicing Dynergy crane Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
9 Fatal 1984 Iowa USA Jacobs 10kw Ugene Stallhut, ground crew, driving tractor as tow
vehicle, tractor flipped over crushing him
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
10 Fatal 1989 Palm Springs, CA USA 65kw John Donnelly, atop nacelle, servicing Nordtank nacelle,
no brake, lanyard caught on main shaft protrusion,
death attributed to "multiple amputations" as he was
dragged into the machinery.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
11 Fatal 1990 Holland 100kw Dick Hozeman, atop nacelle, entered Polenko nacelle in
storm, no brake, caught on spinning shaft.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
12 Fatal 1990 Island of Lolland Denmark 400kw Leif Thomsen, & Kaj Vadstrup, both killed servicing
rotor, no locking pin on rotor, brake released
accidentally, rotor began moving catching man basket &
knocking it to the ground, third man clung to tower until
rescued.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
13 Fatal 1991 Tehachapi, CA USA 90kw Thomas Swan, crane operator, travelling, locking pin
failed, boom swung downhill into 66 kV power line,
electructing him.
Wind Energy -- The Breath of Life or the Kiss
of Death: Contemporary Wind Mortality
Rates, by Paul Gipe
http://www.wind-
works.org/articles/BreathLife.html
14 Fatal 1991 Australia Farm windmill A 16 year old boy died of asphyxiation in a windmill
accident on his family's farm. Apparently he climbed the
windmill to
retrieve a broken coupling, and in doing so he was
caught by the rotating shaft, and strangled by his own
clothing. His mother found him with his arms above his
head and his clothing twisted up around his neck. His
skivvy was twisted very tightly around the windmill shaft.
His mother desperately tried to untangle him, or to lift
him, but she was unable to do so. Despite her frantic
efforts, she was aware that her son was already dead
when she found him. The 1991 date is uncertain but
hinted at by a pro-wind group.
Windmills sourced material by Farmsafe - a
compilation of material sourced from
range of websites (as identified within this
document) Farmsafe WA Alliance 31/5/04
following an enquiry concerning sending
workers out to maintain windmills.
http://www.farmsafewa.org/downloads/Wind
mills%20sourced%20material%20by%20Far
msafe.pdf
15 Fatal 1991 Australia 7m high farm windmill A farmer died after falling from a windmill while
attempting to repair its tail section. The top of the
windmill was
approximately seven metres from the ground and the tail
section of the
windmill was broken and hanging down. The fan portion
was not turning
and several blades on the fan were missing. There was
a steel ladder,
constructed on one side of the windmill, which extended
from the ground
to the platform (five metres above the ground).
Farm-Related Fatalities in Australia, 1989-
1992. Australian Centre for Agricultural
Health and Safety and Rural Industries
Research and Development Corporation.
ISBN 1 87649196 5
http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/HCC/00-
70.pdf

21. WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%
= Safety at Sea for explosive cargos & Tanker operations
= The TS820 Rotor System!

22. Hybrid Evolution = Using 5 existing things!
= Hybrid Wind Propulsion Technologies
= Main Hybrid Components Shipping!
Existing Vessel
Existing Main Engine
Existing
Wind Propulsion
Existing
Crew
Existing Navigation & Control
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Hybrid Wind Power = Safety at Sea using existing technologies!
Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
= RETROFIT FLETTNER CONTAINER VESSEL
arket Ship
ers
We reduce opera7ng
cost by up to 50%
Industrial supply ch
and global veAng
procedures
on
ROI
We reduce emission
pollu7on by up to 50%
A proven technolog
with patented
improvements

23. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
= RETROFIT FLETTNER CONTAINER VESSEL? More difficult Yes possible Yes!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
improvements
BRACKET MOUNTED DECK MOUNTED
= NEW BUILD FLETTNER CONTAINER VESSEL? No Problem!

24. "Even aMer the successful test of the
First FlePner Ship in 1925, Mankind
was s7ll too ignorant to make use of
the technology even though it was
right under his nose”
Albert Einstein
Source: Albert Einstein paper on
flettner rotor University of Jerusalem
“Your Play” Thank you for your attention!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Watch it Sail in 1925: https://youtu.be/PSFeoj4gwPk

25. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM

26. Hybrid Evolution is history = intelligent industrial innovation
= Combination of Existing Technologies
= Fuel Burn Reduction of 25% to 50%!
WWW.THiiiNK.COM
Please note: the graphics have been corrected from original article to fit the TS820 rotor described.

27. Disclaimer
The technical data contained herein is by way of example and
should not be relied on for any specific applica8on. THiiiNK
Holding Switzerland AG will be pleased to provide specific
technical data or specifica8ons with respect to any customer's
par8cular applica8ons. Use of the technical data or
specifica8ons contained herein without the express wriEen
approval of THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG is at user's risk and
THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG expressly disclaims
responsibility for such use and the situa8ons that may result
there from.
THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG makes no warranty, express or
implied, that u8lisa8on of the technology or products disclosed
herein will not infringe any industrial or intellectual property
rights of third par8es.
THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG is constantly involved in
engineering and development. Accordingly, THiiiNK Holding
Switzerland AG reserves the right to modify, at any 8me, the
technology and product specifica8ons contained herein.
All technical data, specifica8ons and other informa8on
contained herein is deemed to be the proprietary intellectual
property of THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG. No reproduc8on,
copy or use thereof may be made without the express wriEen
consent of THiiiNK Holding Switzerland AG.