Rubric target contract

1. A RUBRIC FOR TEACHER’S ASSESSMENT
Distinguished
(3)
Satisfactory
(2)
Borderline
(1)
Unsatisfactory
(0)
Partsofthereport
Title The title says
what you did. It
is brief and
describe the
main points of
the experiment
or investigation
Brife title
which doesn’t
describe the
main points of
the experiment
or
investigation.
Long title
which doesn’t
describe the
main points of
the
experiment or
investigation.
There is no title.
Introduction or
Purpose
The introduction
explains the
objectives or
purpose of the
lab.
The
introduction
doesn’t explain
all the
objectives or
purpose of the
lab correctly.
The
introduction
doesn’t
explain the
objectives or
purpose of the
lab.
There is no
introduction.
Materials Everything
needed to
complete is
experiment are
listed.
Only a few
materials is
missing.
An important
number of
materials is
missing.
Lots of materials
are missing or
“Materials part”
missing.
Methods All the detailed
steps to
complete the
process
investigation are
written.
Only the most
important
steps to
complete the
process
investigation
are written.
Not all the
steps to
complete the
process
investigation
are written.
Lots of steps to
complete the
process
investigation are
missing, or
“Method part”
missing.
Data Numerical data
obtained from
the procedure is
presented as a
table.
Numerical data
obtained from
the procedure
is presented
but not as a
table.
Numerical
data obtained
from the
procedure is
incomplete.
There are data
results in the
report.
Results The data
meaning is
perfectly
described in
words.
The data
meaning is
described in
words, but not
perfectly.
The data
meaning is not
correctly
described in
words.
There are no
results in the
report.
Discussion There is a
correct
discussion about
the results.
There is a
discussion
about the
results but not
enough.
There is an
incorrect
discussion
about the
results.
There is no
discussion about
the results.
Conclusions The conclusion
sums up what
happened in the
experiment, if
the hypothesis is
accepted or not,
and what this
means.
The conclusion
sums up what
happened in
the
experiment,
but not if the
hypothesis is
accepted or
not, and what
this means.
The conclusion
sums up
correctly what
happened in
the
experiment,
neither if the
hypothesis is
accepted or
There is no
conclusion.

2. not, and what
this means.
Figures and
Graphs
Figure labeled
with a
descriptive title
and with all the
mateterial
name.
Not labeled
figure.
Incomplete
figure with
missing parts.
There is no figure
in the report.
Oralpresentation
Participation All group
members
participate
equally.
All group
members
participate.
Some group
members
participate.
Only 1 or 2 group
members
participate.
Collaboration
between
members
Group members
help each other
as needed.
Some of the
group
members help
each other as
needed.
Very few
group
members help
each other as
needed.
None of the
group members
help each other
as needed.
Understanding All group
members speak
clearly and are
easy to
understand.
Most group
members
speak clearly
and are
easy to
understand.
Some group
members
speak
clearly, but are
difficult to
understand.
Only 1 or 2 group
members speak
and can be
understood.
Focusing on
the audience
All group
members speak
to the entire
audience.
Most group
members
speak to the
entire
audience.
Group
members
speak to only
part of the
audience.
Most group
members speak
only to part of
the audience.
Organization Information is
presented in an
organized way.
Information is
presented in an
organized way.
Information
may be only
partially
organized.
Information is
presented in a
disorganized
way.
Details Oral
presentation
includes many
details.
Oral
presentation
includes some
details.
Oral
presentation
includes few
details.
Oral presentation
includes very few
or no details.
Global view Presentation is
visually
organized and
complete.
Presentation is
organized and
complete.
Presentation is
complete.
Presentation is
disorganized or
incomplete.

3. AN ASSESSMENT CONTRACT FOR PEER’S ASSESMENT
PEER’S ASSESSMENT.
A separation of a real mixture in the lab.
Name of the partner you are evaluating:………………………...
Points: ……………….. (Maximum 10 Points)
Name of the partner you are evaluating:………………………...
Points: ……………….. (Maximum 10 Points)
Name of the partner you are evaluating:………………………...
Points: ……………….. (Maximum 10 Points)
Name of the partner you are evaluating:………………………...
Points: ……………….. (Maximum 10 Points)
Your signatures:
The scoring can help you to evaluate your team partner:
Team value / Aportaciones realizadas al equipo. 1 to 10
Ready to work / Disponibilidad en el trabajo. 1 to 10
Team spirit / Unidad con el grupo. 1 to 10
On time / Puntualidad en las entregas. 1 to 10
Final product / Trabajo realizado. 1 to 10
Team work / Colaboración en el proceso. 1 to 10
TOTAL SCORE: score/60 *10

4. A Self-assessment Target
DIANA DE AUTOEVALUACIÓN
A separation of a real mixture in the LAB
4
Name:_________________
Date:______________
Materials and methods
3
2
1
details
organization Conclusions and discussion
Introduction and purpose
Data and results
Understanding and focusing
Global view
PUNTUATION:
Parts of the report Oral presentation
Participation and collaboration

5. THINKING ABOUT MY PUNCTUATION
In INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE I’ve got … points. Why and how I could improve it: …………………………………………………:…………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Write the same for the other topics of the self-assesment target.