Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Figure 1. Father Attachment Anxiety Model Introduce
Similar to Figure 1. Father Attachment Anxiety Model Introduce (20)
More from ChereCheek752
More from ChereCheek752 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Figure 1. Father Attachment Anxiety Model Introduce
- 1. Figure 1. Father Attachment Anxiety Model Introduce your study here. Introduction
- 2. Hypotheses go here H1: H2: H3: Method Add your references here. Hypotheses Results: What are the results of your study? The results of this study indicated one significant indirect relationship between _____ and ______ (p= .#, co= .#) when mediated by variable. Though finding no significant correlations between either _____ and _____ (p = .#, co= .#) was contrary to previous findings, this study’s results are consistent with the existing literature which states . . . Overall, _____ was / was not found to be significant mediator between ____ and ___. This may suggest . . . These findings do/do not provide support for ____. Limitations & Future Research: Describe any limitations
- 3. What directions should future research consider? *make sure the edges of these boxes align Discussion Sample Father-Attachment Anxiety DASSDEP (Depression) Externally-Oriented Thinking Difficulty Identifying Feelings TOSCASHA (Shame-Proneness) Difficulty Describing Feelings a2=.4015, p=.0257 d2=.0896, p=.0000 d1=.0976, p=.0000
- 4. d4=-.0302, p=.1293 d3=-.0816, p=.3969 a1=.0796, p=.5416 a3=-.0605, p=.5848 c’=.0377, p=-.0102 b3=.0073, p=.3526 b1=.0378, p=.0000 b4=-.0034, p=.4792 b2=.0038, p=.1611 a1=-.1309, p=.2624 DASSDEP (Depression) Father-Attachment Avoidance Externally-Oriented Thinking Difficulty Identifying Feelings TOSCASHA (Shame-Proneness) Difficulty Describing Feelings a2=.0044, p=.9748 d2=.0905, p=.0000 d1=.1060, p=.0000 d4=-.0266, p=.1738 b3=.0094, p=.2235 b1=.0324, p=.0000 b4=-.0025, p=.6023 d3=.0680, p=.4264 a3=-.1156, p=.2408 c’=-.0122, p=.3613 b2=.0057, p=.0340 a1=.4125, p=.0073 DASSDEP (Depression) Mother-Attachment Anxiety Externally-Oriented Thinking Difficulty Identifying Feelings TOSCASHA
- 5. (Shame-Proneness) Difficulty Describing Feelings a2=-.0743, p=.7256 d2=.0905, p=.0000 d1=.1060, p=.0000 d4=-.0266, p=.1738 b3=.0094, p=.2235 b1=.0324, p=.0000 b4=-.0025, p=.6023 d3=.1136, p=.3119 a3=-.0695, p=.5913 c’=.0040, p=.8191 b2=.0057, p=.0340 DASSDEP (Depression) Mother-Attachment Avoidance Externally-Oriented Thinking Difficulty Identifying Feelings TOSCASHA (Shame-Proneness) Difficulty Describing Feelings a2=.1207, p=.5041 d2=.0896, p=.0000 d1=.0976, p=.0000 d4=-.0302, p=.1293 b3=.0073, p=.3526 b1=.0378, p=.0000 b4=-.0034, p=.4792 d3=.3524, p=.0003 a1=.2611, p=.0462 a3=.2522, p=.0233 c’=.0318, p=.0318 b2=.0038, p=.1611 Concise and Informative Title Names of Contributors
- 6. Measures Describe your measures here. Relationships Structures (ECR) This nine-item questionnaire measures attachment styles in mother and father relationships. The scale analyzes both anxious and avoidant attachment styles. A higher score on this scale indicates a more insecure relationship pattern. The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) This scale measures the condition of alexithymia according to alexithymia total, difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking (Griffin & Bartholomew, 1994). Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) This test is used to measure and distinguish guilt and shame. It presents the participants with different scenarios, followed by responses which they are asked to rank on a 5-point scale. These responses are then summed up to measure the participant’s estimated levels of shame and guilt. Abstract goes here.
- 7. Abstract Describe your sample here. Here are some ideas for visually displaying your demographics ECRMAV ECRMANX ECRFAV ECRFANX DASSDEP TAS-EOT TAS-DIF Talk about your method here. What is your model? References 5% Figure 1. Father Attachment Anxiety Model Figure 2. Father Attachment Avoidance Model Figure 3. Mother Attachment Anxiety Model
- 8. Figure 4. Mother Attachment Avoidance Model Statistical Results by Attachment Style TOSCASHA TAS-DDF Add more relevant and informative information here. It does not have to be what is in this example. 1 Gender Male Female Other 397 549 9 Race White African-American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish Origin Other 744 73 6 53 57 22 Engaging Introduction goes here Concise and Informative Title Names of Contributors
- 9. Hypotheses Explain results here. • Consider including graphs, tables, charts to aid in conveying results to audience in a quick and effective manner i.e. The correlations between each of the variables were determined and can be observed in Table 1. Means for each variable for both conditions were also recorded and are displayed in Table 2. Header Two (Divide up larger boxes with Headers; it’s easier on the eyes)
- 10. Study results explained. More information Describe your sample and demographics here Include graphics (see below) to help audience understand quickly (i.e pie chart, bar graph)
- 11. More info on what a bar chart is – see Warner textbook Chapter 1, p. 11 Figure 1. Demographic data. Talk about independent variables here. Measures - IV Discuss the study and its findings here. Limitations What were your study’s limitations?
- 12. Future Research What would you recommend future researchers do in light of your research findings? List Hypotheses here H1: H2: Sample Introduction Results Discussion Procedure Describe your procedure here. Interaction between [relevant included variables] Talk about either significant or non-significant findings. Include anything helpful, like figures/tables.
- 13. Figure 3. Estimated Marginal Means of Measure_1 Header Two Significant? Interaction Effects Measures - DV Talk about dependent variables here. For more information on dependent variables, see Warner Chapter 1, p. 19 Leave yourself notes if you would like. (also, present this at research week!) 1 EDCO 745 Poster: Draft Grading Rubric
- 14. Criteria Levels of Achievement Content Advanced Proficient Developing Below Expectations Not present Summary of the Research 4 points The student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed. 3 points The student’s summary included most arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). 2 points The student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). 1 points The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). 0 points Not Present Working Research Question(s) 4 points The working research questions are clearly stated and understandable. 3 points Most of the working research questions are stated and understandable. 2 points
- 15. Some of the working research questions are stated but are vague. 1 points Working research questions are poorly stated and cannot be understood. 0 points Not Present IV, DVs, Covariates interview questions 4 points IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable. 3 points Most of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable. 2 points Some of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) interview questions are partially described. 1 points IV, DVs, and covariates interview questions are poorly described. 0 points Not Present Results 3 points The appropriate tables and visuals are provided in the analysis. 1 to 2 points Most of the appropriate tables and are provided in the analysis. 0 to 1 points Some of appropriate tables and visuals are provided in the analysis. 1 points The appropriate tables and visuals are not provided in the analysis. 0 points Not Present
- 16. Discussion 3 points The interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. 2 to 3 points Most of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. 1 to 2 points Some of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. 0 to 1 points The interpretation of results, limitations, and future research have minimal discussion. 0 points Not Present Structure Style 6 to 7 Points The assignment properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. The assignment reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors. 4 to 6 Points The assignment mostly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly. The assignment reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary.
- 17. There are few spelling and/or grammar errors. 2 to 4 Points The assignment uses some current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly. The assignment sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are some spelling and/or grammar errors. 1 to 2 Points The assignment uses few current APA style and and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly. The assignment seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are many spelling and/or grammar errors. 0 points Not Present Page 2 of 2 EDCO 745 Poster: Draft Assignment Instructions Overview Scholarly dissemination is essential for any doctoral level student. Posters are often a way to ease into scholarly communication. Building a poster is one of the ways scholars participate in the dissemination of knowledge.
- 18. Instructions 1. Your poster submission must have a central focus, as developed from the topic selected in Module 2, and that focus must be evident throughout the poster. Specifically, your introduction, analysis, and results must be focused on a set of research questions and/or hypotheses that are obvious in your theoretical diagram. 2. The focus must comprehensively place the problem/question in appropriate scholarly context (scholarly literature, theory, model, or genre). 3. All elements of method/techniques must be articulated in some way (i.e., graph or bullets). 4. Interpretation is explicitly linked to a theoretical framework or scholarly model. 5. Implications, consequences, and/or questions raised by the project must be thoroughly explored. 6. Limitations must be fully articulated. 7. Presentation of the material must be professional and compelling. See Research Poster Examples for examples. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.