2. N. Maruyama et al. / Thin Solid Films 327–329 (1998) 854–856 855
plex (Fig. 3a). Since the surface active polyion complex
reduces the surface tension between water and chloroform,
the water droplets are stabilized and do not fuse. The dro-
plets are dragged into the solution by convection or keep
floating on the solution surface (Fig. 3b-1). With shrinking
diameter of the evaporating chloroform solution, more
water droplets get close to the three-phase line and are hex-
agonally packed by capillary force generated at the solution
front (Fig. 3b-2) [7]. Then, the three-phase line (solution–
air–substrate) moves over the array of water droplets (Fig.
3b-3). The water droplets and some of the polymer between
them are left behind. Finally, the water evaporates, leading
to the observed honeycomb structure (Fig. 3b-4). A similar
mechanism was proposed by Francois et al. [3].
¸
As already shown in Fig. 2, the size of the honeycomb
structure varies between 1 and 5 mm for a complex of 1 and
5. Similar results were observed with the other compounds
used. The most important parameters to control the size of
the mesoscopic patterns are the relative humidity of the
atmosphere and the concentration of the polymer solution.
Fig. 1. Chemical formulae of the used compounds.
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 2a shows a fluorescence micrograph of a typical cast
film of a complex of 1 and 5 containing octadecyl rhoda-
mine B (0.5 mol% of 5) as a fluorescent probe. The polyion
complex cast film was found to have regular honeycomb
morphology with a size of ca. 1.5 mm per cell. A similar
honeycomb structure was also found to be formed from all
of the other compounds described above. The bright parts of
the picture stems from the rhodamine B fluorescence which
is dissolved in the polymeric complex. This means that the
polymer forms the honeycomb structure. The dark parts of
the micrograph are the voids of the honeycomb and do not
contain polymer. It is evident from atomic force microscopy
(AFM) that the pattern consists of an open honeycomb. Fig.
2b shows the AFM picture of a similar sample. One can see
that the honeycomb structure has a height of 200–300 nm.
Force mapping [4] with the AFM indicates that the bottom
of the voids is not covered by polymer, but exposes the bare
substrate.
We were able to visualize the formation of the pattern in
situ by an optical microscope. Fig. 3 is a schematic illustra-
tion of the mechanism for the formation of the honeycomb
structure: after placing a droplet of chloroform solution on Fig. 2. (a) Fluorescence micrograph of a cast film of polyion complex 1/5.
The polymer contains 0.5 mol% (per repeat unit of polymer) of octadecyl
the substrate, the chloroform starts to evaporate. This leads rhodamine-B as a fluorescent probe. [complex] = 1 mg/ml in chloroform,
to a cooling of the solution, and micron-sized water droplets 50% relative humidity. (b) AFM image of cast film of polyion complex 1/
condense onto the chloroform solution of the polyion com- 5. [complex] = 0.077 mg/ml, 50% relative humidity.
3. 856 N. Maruyama et al. / Thin Solid Films 327–329 (1998) 854–856
Fig. 4 shows the dependence of the mesoscopic pattern of a
complex of 3 and 5 on these two parameters. Regular pat-
terns with a size of the honeycomb of a few micrometers can
be formed with 1 mmol/l and 0.5 mmol/l of 3/5. As
expected, the rim of the honeycomb becomes thinner with
decreasing concentration. At concentrations as low as 0.1
mmol/l the amount of polymer is too low to stabilize the
water droplets and fusion of the droplets takes place,
destroying the pattern. Regular patterns were found between
50% and 80% relative humidity. Higher humidity leads to
larger honeycombs, because more water condenses into the
chloroform solution. This leads to larger water droplets and
thus to larger voids of the honeycomb. The smallest honey-
comb patterns, with a void size of 500 nm, were found in
mixtures of 7 and 9. Fig. 4. Concentration and humidity dependence of the honeycomb struc-
Even though all results presented in this paper were car- ture of a complex of 3 and 5. The concentrations are given in mmol of
repeat unit per liter.
ried out with glass as a substrate, other substrates can be used
as well. We found that the patterns can be formed not only on various hydrophilic substrates, such as glass, quartz, silicon
wafer, mica, or indium tin oxide, but also on hydrophobic
substrates, such as silanized glass. Furthermore, other sol-
vents than chloroform can be used, e.g. benzene. This find-
ing will broaden future applications of these patterns.
4. Conclusions
We have described the formation of ordered mesoscopic
honeycomb patterns by a simple solution casting process. A
wide variety of functional amphiphilic polymers can be
used. Together with the fact that the substrate is also vari-
able, this will broaden the applicability of these new pat-
terns in future.
References
[1] H. Ringsdorf, B. Schlarb, J. Venzmer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
27 (1988) 113.
[2] M. Shimomura, Prog. Polym. Sci. 18 (1993) 295.
[3] G. Widawski, M. Rawiso, B. Francois, Nature 369 (1994) 387.
¸
˚ ¨
[4] L. Grasjo, O. Karthaus, N. Maruyama, M. Shimomura, Polymer
Prepr. Japan 46 (1997) E239.
[5] M. Shimomura, K. Utsugi, J. Horikoshi, K. Okuyama, O. Hatozaki,
N. Oyama, Langmuir 7 (1991) 760.
[6] M. Shimomura, R. Ando, T. Kunitake, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem.
87 (1983) 1134.
Fig. 3. Formation mechanism of honeycomb structure of polyion com- [7] E. Adachi, A.S. Dimitrov, K. Nagayama, Langmuir 11 (1995) 1057.
plexes: (a) top view; (b) side view.