Are Homeless People Right Or Wrong

Are Homeless People Right Or Wrong
Is it wrong to stare at someone after they fall rather than help them? Is it right to give money to a homeless man begging in front of a sign that says
no soliciting? Everyday we face situations where we must decide whether something is right or wrong before we do it, or it'll be considered immoral
or wrong. With this stigma in mind, is the difference between right and wrong clear? How are we affected by this kind of thought process? Though
many people perceive right and wrong as a singular, definitive, or one–sided, statement where as something can ONLY be right or wrong, it is much
more complex than that. Right and wrong is relative, in need of variables, or in our case, in need of circumstances. A long time ago, I read an article
that said a group of scientists took a sample... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nearly all of the kids said the man was wrong for committing a crime of stealing, while everyone north of 14 years old had said that it was justified
because they were homeless. It is this gap of judgement that helps define the difference between right and wrong. Without taking personal feelings into
consideration, you can conclude that there is no right or wrong, what is right to one may be wrong to others, you can even use that logic to the
statement i just made! From the moment we are able to comprehend spoken language and/or communicate through some other method, we are taught
that there is a right and wrong without being able to fully grasp the content of a situation. This leads to kids to decide that something is right or wrong
without putting any thought into their answer. Even considering that judgement skills aren't fully developed, to some it might cause them to think in
that very linear fashion their whole lives. This Keth 1 could lead to discrimination, the belief that your ideas and way of life is superior to others, and
unfair, but not necessarily wrong actions imposed on others. During the time of Salem
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Redemption In Les Miserables
The Change From Past To Present "True redemption is when guilt leads to good" (Khaled Hosseini). Not one person on earth is completely free
from wrongs. Humans have lapses in judgement that can hurt them and others. Some people believe you can be redeemed and can put your wrongs
behind you, these people are kind and generous. Others believe you have one chance to get it right, these people are often angry and judgmental.
There are also those who believe that someone can't be redeemed, but begin to realize that people can change. By looking at the Bishop, Javert, and
Jean Valjeanand their actions it becomes clear that Les Miserables is a book about redemption coming to those who did wrongs in their past and
the behaviors of those who believe and don't believe. The Bishop was only in Les Miserables for a short time but the effect he had on Jean Valjean
carried throughout the entire book. The Bishop believes that people can make lousy decisions but still be redeemed of them. When Jean Valjean
stole the silver the Bishop didn't condemn him, he gave him the chance to change the path he was going down, ". . . God has brought you out of
darkness. I have bought your soul for God" (Movie). The Bishop's feelings on redemption made him a kind generous man, giving Jean Valjean a
chance at a new life. Javert is a foil of the Bishop, he believes people can't be redeemed of their wrongs and is severe as a result. Throughout much of
the book the police inspector, Javert,

Personal Ethical Argument
The set of personal ethical principles which I live by are comprised of a belief in absolute right and wrong, man's duty to obey God, and also his
duty to love his neighbor as himself; each of these principles were formed by a Faith in God and in the Bible. The principle of absolute right and
wrong was constructed through understanding that if right and wrong were contingent on man's opinions and attitudes, then both laws and guidelines
would become pointless. Furthermore, God shows that right and wrong are absolute and not contingent on man when He states His warning, "Woe
unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" (Isaiah
5:20). In addition to this principle, I also came to believe that man is called to obey God for several reasons: He is all–powerful, He created man to
give Himself glory, and He desires what is best for us. Like the two previous ethical principles, loving one's neighbor as himself, was constructed out of
a faith in God and in His infallible Word. Man is called to perform this practice because, as the Bible states, God "... first loved us." (1 John 4:19)...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, one also may improve in identifying which actions are right and wrong in moral dilemmas. An example of this would be when I
considered quitting my youth group band. Although I loved my role in the group, it was wrong for me to continue; it was hypocritical to be in a
leadership role with an unclean heart. By understanding that right and wrong are absolute, I knew that it did not matter if it was me or another person,
it was wrong. Because of this reality, I quit the band until I became right with

sula feminism
Feminism and anti–feminism in Sula: Right or wrong? Feminism has been in society for decades. In some societies, we see how women are kept in
their boundaries. In some countries women have to cover their entire bodies in clothing to keep from dishonoring their families. In most traditional
societies a woman is to remain virginal to be considered worthy of marriage. In America, women were constrained to the household and weren't
allowed to work or vote. These actions were and are considered by some, anti–feminist. But, when is feminism taken to far? Has the act of feminism
become an excuse for women to act out because we have rights? Or is it ok to do so to be considered liberated. Whenever a woman does something
negative she is in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Of course some acts of feminism are to be considered acts of heroism. But, are women today getting the wrong message from what Sula is all
about? Sula is not about sleeping around to prove her worth, or saying what she pleases to be rude. Sula is about the independence in a woman.
Not being submissive to a man, but being your own person. Sula represents the rights women should have to do as they please without being wild
as some women take being a feminist as today. Feminism in retrospect is about having the same rights as men. But, that does not make the wrong
things that men do ok for a woman to do as well. Whether done by a man or a woman, some behavior is still not appropriate. Feminism used to be
about equal rights for jobs and voting and important matters. Now, women use feminism and equal "rights" to perform behavior that is not ideal
behavior for anyone with good morals. As a country that believes in Christ should feminism even exist? Women who have the wrong idea of
feminism give up their dignity and pride to be considered free. Women have sex freely and men still look down on them. Instead of being viewed as
pure you are viewed as dirty. If anything, the act of feminism has caused women to be even more degraded today. Women expose themselves in music
videos and pornography. Women are looked at as mere objects of pleasure. If we stuck to the biblical meaning of a woman, women could

Good Opinion On Socrates
To be as good as one can be without the fear of having to face death is what Socrates strongly wants Athenians to do. "You are wrong,sir, if you
think that a man who is any good at all should take into account the risk of life or death... whether he is acting like a good or a bad man." (Apology,
28B). What Socrates is trying to say to the Athenians is that a good man should only focus on his actions, to make sure that what he is doing is
the right and not wrong, and whether what he is doing will make him a better person. It is not about what everyone else wants us to do and follow
but to live a good and moral life. That if a person examines whether what he is doing is right death should not even cross his mind. If someone is
being put on trial or tried to death he should not be ashamed or embarrassed and the reason for that is because he is following what he believes is
right and not wrong. Socrates mentions in his "Apology" that if someone were ever to ask him if he felt ashamed of living the life that he was
living and he was being put to trial and tried for death for it he would say that he is wrong for having asked such a question like that. Wrong
because if he is living and knows he is living a pious life then there is nothing to be ashamed of, he is living the way that the gods want him and
everyone else to live and that is by having self knowledge. It would then be wrong if one started living a life of falseness and wickedness by doing
things that would get him to avoid death. Socrates also talks about how a good man should never assume he knows something when in reality he
does not. "I differ from the majority of men... I do know, however, that it is wicked and shameful to do wrong. To disobey one's superior, be he god
or man. I shall never fear or avoid things of which I do not know, whether they may not be good rather than things that I know to be bad." (Apology,
29B–C). Socrates mentions that if there is one thing that he differs from everyone else is that he acknowledges that he does not know about the
underworld and there is no reason to fear. Whereas, Athenians claim that it is the greatest of all evils and they would do anything to avoid it. What
Socrates then has that the Athenians do not have is

The Wrong Man Ivins
Many people today receive mail in various of ways. Today, many people receive mail by phone or computer, but most of us get our mail by letter/card
and people believe that the mail is a piece of paper in an envelope that's harmless and safe to handle However, in 2001, there was a mysteries anthrax
attack by mail which scared tons of people in Trenton, New Jersey because it happened a week after the 9/11 plane crashing in the twin towers killing
tons of innocent people. This attack was terrifying to civilians who lost their loved ones in the attack on September 11, 2001 because they were afraid
that this situation was another attack on America. Unfortunately, 5 people were killed and and another 15 were poisoned from the attrax traced letters
that were delivered the victims. This attack made numerous amount of people speculated an American biologist Bruce Edwards Ivins due to the fact
that he worked with anthrax for several years and had suicidal thoughts toward him and women frequently and depressed. Other people question an
American physician Steven Hatfill due to the fact that he made frequent visits to Fort Detrick which was an American installation and was the center of
the U.S. biological weapons program. But one suspect that plenty of humans thought to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the article "The Wrong Man," it stated "Reports said that Ivins harbored homicidal urges, especially toward women." This goes to shows that
there is a possibility that his suicidal feeling toward people and himself may have triggered to come with this terrible idea of killing people by mail
and putting them in mail killing the innocent people and later kill himself. This makes Invins a high possible candidate for one of the people that
caused the attack because maybe just maybe he would have thought of his "great" plan was to poison and kill

My Love Story
I loved Bob with all my heart, or as much as you could love someone in 1252 in England as a female. I have told you about Bob before, haven't I? He
knew everything about me–from my favorite color to my deepest secrets. We did everything together, too; we went to the pond together, we went to
the market together, we even ate together. We always exchanged "I love you" whenever we saw each other, and everyone thought we would
eventually get married. He cared about me, and I cared about him. We were the perfect love story. Of course, all perfect stories must come to an
end. It was a warm autumn day. The sun was shining, the leaves on the trees were brilliant reds, oranges, and golds, and everyone was out taking
care of business on our measly dirt road. Bob and I had spent the day cleaning his home and taking care of his younger sisters, so we were both
burning up. As we left his house, I had a brilliant idea. "Bob darling, let us go to the pond. We can cool off there!" The pond was a beautiful,
tranquil place. The only sounds that could be heard were the breeze rustling the weeping willows beside the pond and the birds chirping in the
willows. The pale, calm blue of the pond had helped me fall asleep a number of times. It was a wonderful place to cool off and swim, too. Bob
however, instead of getting excited–as he had on multiple occasions at any mention of the pond–jumped away from me, guilt written on his face. "I
can't, I...I..." "Bob? Are you alright?" I asked, concerned. "Of course. I just can't come to the pond today," he responded, his composure regained.
"I...uh...I have other plans. I'm sorry." "Oh. Alright then. It's okay." He smiled at me, and I smiled back, although it was a little forced. Then, he
turned around and disappeared into the bustle of the market. As I watched him walk away, my smile faded. What was wrong with him? Or is it me?
He always hung out with me, even if he had previous arrangements. This continued for days; I would want to do something together, but Bob would
have other engagements. Soon, we were doing nothing. I quickly grew suspicious. What could he possibly be doing? Eventually, I decided to follow
him to his 'other engagements'. It was a

Marriage Equality
Same sex marriage is one of the most controversial trends that appear in the world today. In today's society most of us are taught that a marriage
should be a union between a man and a woman, as well as, same sex relationships being a sin because it is looked down upon by God. Despite the
criticism of gay marriage many states such as Massachusetts, California, New York, and Oregon have made same sex marriage legal. In the fight
for gay marriage political essay such as "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson and "What's Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Kath Pollitt
were inspired. In these essays both writers have different points of views, but they are also both very persuasive on what's right and wrong with same
sex marriage along ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite the criticism of gay marriage many states such as Massachusetts, California, New York, and Oregon have made same sex marriage legal. In
the fight for gay marriage political essay such as "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson and "What's Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by
Kath Pollitt were inspired. In these essays both writers have different points of views, but they are also both very persuasive on what's right and wrong
with same sex marriage along with supporting points.
should be a union between a man and a woman, as well as, same sex relationships being a sin because it is looked down upon by God. Despite the
criticism of gay marriage many states such as Massachusetts, California, New York, and Oregon have made same sex marriage legal. In the fight
for gay marriage political essay such as "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson and "What's Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Kath
Pollitt were inspired. In these essays both writers have different points of views, but they are also both very persuasive on what's right and wrong with
same sex marriage along with supporting points.
should be a

Guilt Is A Raw Instinctive Emotion Of Human Nature
Surname 1
Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date
Guilt
Introduction
Guilt is a raw instinctive emotion of the human nature. Is there a general way through human beings and all other forms of life would be distinguished
from one another. Both humans and other forms of life on earth have the element of life, the element of survival. Through feeding and excretion they
are both similar. In almost every aspect of life for both human and other forms of life, they are identical to each other. If for example, both did not feed,
their fate would be equally the same. Through the theory of evolution of man, it is argued that he evolved from the most basic form of life and over
the years evolved in what he is today, a prime being, at the top of the list. But what differentiates the two apart. Intellectuality and the ability to use
reason is the very fundamental difference between human beings and other forms of life. Having intellect means the ability to use reason to make
decisions and choices. There however, is a difference between choices. Choices could either be voluntary or involuntary. Actions that are made through
involuntary choices could be termed as the raw instincts elements of man, some of which could probably be compared to those of animals and other
living organisms. On the other hand, there are actions that are based on voluntary choices, actions that an individual knows their consequence but goes
on to do them.
Take for example, a little child not more than 5 years, meaning that his

Why Is Gay Marriage Wrong
It seems that ever since gay marriage has been legalized the nation has been buzzing about what is right and what is wrong. The 4 months after gay
marriage was legalized, there are still protests going on that it should be wrong and illegal. There are plenty of facts to show that both sides could be
right or wrong. Gay marriage is wrong. The bible says that," man may not lay with mankind, neither woman with womankind". The bible quote
means that a man and man shall not be together nor a woman and a woman, and the importance of this quote from the bible is that if man was with
man and woman was with woman, none of us would be here right now. Christianity is not the only religion that says that gay marriage is wrong.
There are over 15 different religions that think gay marriage is wrong. Muslims and Buddhists are two examples of these religions. Gay marriage is
wrong and should be illegal because there are plenty of facts and reasoning behind it. There are studies showing that kids raised by straight parents
are more successful in life than those raised by gay parents. A 2012 study by Mark Regnerus (Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of
Texas) found that children raised by gay ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were over 30 states that made gay marriage illegal before the Federal Government made it legal. Gays also put straight couples who decide
to not get married in harm too. Gay marriage raises health care prices for the straight couples who decide to not get married. Gay marriage is
destroying the life of the straight couples and those who don't believe in it. In conclusion, gay marriage should still be illegal because of all of the
chaos it has caused between the gay protestors and the people who believe that it is wrong. There are also plenty of facts to show why it should still
be illegal. Gay marriage is destroying our nation little by little until we do something about

The Big Lebowski And Fargo Film Analysis
1.Analyze elements of postmodernism and the themes of the film illustrated in these clips from CHILDREN OF MEN.
Children of Men is a perfect example of Postmodernism in film. It features apocalyptic stories and setting, shown in both of the clips. In the first clip,
the opening scene of the movie, we are introduced to this world of infertility and grayness. Even before we see anything, audio of news reports tell us
of the world to expect in the film. In a dreary, gray–toned cafГ©, people gather and watch in silence as the news tells of the death of the youngest
person alive. The somber hopelessness and fear of the ever–approaching end of humanity is clear. Theo is detached and cool in spite of the horrible
circumstances, as are many other characters. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They are people who wouldn't normally be featured in a movie. Jerry is an average car salesman with an average son and a wife living off her
dad's money. He feels he is not respected, and he is right. The Dude is an unemployed loser who spends his days drinking white Russians, smoking
cannabis, and bowling. Donny is a guy who doesn't have anyone else to hang out with, so he spends his time with people who constantly berate him.
Walter is a loud man who can't move on from Vietnam or his ex–wife, mentioning them frequently and often inappropriately, like at Donny's sad excuse
for a funeral. The losers, who are often larger–than–life characters imposing themselves onto other's lives, create an environment that is unpredictable
and sets up the action of the movies. The ashes blowing back onto The Dude are completely unexpected, yet exactly what needed to happen at that

Conscience In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men
This quote shows that your conscience is always with you. He hears a heartbeat and assumes that it is the old man's heart beating faster, because he
is scared. The heartbeat that he is hearing is not the old man's, it is his conscience trying to tell him that he is not doing a good deed. Even though he
did not kill the old man yet, his conscience knows that he is about to. So, his conscience is giving him warning signals to stop what he is doing.
This quote shows that the man is scared of how the old man's eye looks. He is mad that the eye is scary and he can't stand looking at it. His
conscience is wanting to make him feel scared of the eye. If he is scared of the eye, then he wouldn't get any ideas about harming the old man.
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His conscience knew that he could try to make the man go crazy because normal people aren't able to hear a heartbeat. He was very persistent in
wanting to kill the old man, so even the heartbeat that he was hearing wasn't able to stop him.
This shows that he was starting to feel really guilty, he thought that the police might have known what he actually did. His conscience made him feel
that way so that he would be exposed for doing something wrong. He lied to the police and killed a man, his conscience makes him feel this way so
that he would correct what he did and pay for it. This quote shows that he still hears the heartbeat even though the old man is dead. He still believes
that the heart is the old man's and doesn't consider that it could be his. His conscience makes him able to hear the old man's heartbeat. The man thinks
that since he killed the old man, the heartbeat would go away, but it doesn't. His inner voice was reminding him what he felt, and that is what the old
man is feeling right now. He knows what that feels like, even though he hasn't done anything wrong yet, his conscience is trying to stop him from doing
anything stupid or

Good Man Gone Wrong, By Fred Boalt: An Analysis
The relationship between the United States and Pancho Villa played a major role in the history of Mexico. Both parties were involved in the Mexican
Revolution, which lasted from 1910–1920, and the relationship they had with one another significantly altered the course of the revolution. On March
13, 1916, Fred Boalt wrote an article for the Tacoma Times newspaper, entitled Good Man Gone Wrong, describing some details of the Mexican
revolutionary Pancho Villa and the relationship he had with theUnited States. Boalt argues that the shift of relationship between the United States and
Villa ultimately led to Villa becoming a "Good Man Gone Wrong." In a sense, Boalt tries to give a sympathetic view of Villa, by attributing his
change in attitude to the United States severing ties with him. The author of the article is writing from an American point of view, so national biases
can be a factor in his analysis of the US–Villa relationship. In this paper, I will seek to answer the following questions: What kind of relationship did
the United States have with Pancho Villa, and how did this impact theMexican Revolution? To properly understand the relationship ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He describes some details of Villa's upbringing and the life he lived before being an active revolutionary. He had a simple life as a farmer and did not
come from a lot of money. However, he had lofty ideas of caring for the poor and needy long before he ever became a leader in the revolution. The
author describes him as wanting to see lower–class Mexicans advancing in good jobs and sending their kids to schools so they will not be illiterate.
Boalt's article is a primary source that tells a lot about the relationship between the United States and Pancho Villa and the impact their actions had on
the Mexican

Worldview Of A Christian Essay
Worldview of a Christian
What does the world look like through the lens of a Christian? The answers to this question can be found directly from the Bible. There are many parts
to the Christian Worldview, but the seven main parts are; what God is like, the nature of the universe, the nature of man,ethics and morality, the cause
of evil and suffering, what happens to man after death, and the meaning of history. The Biblical Worldview of a Christian is important because it helps
us develop our faith in God and become closer to him. Everyone should have the Biblical Worldview of a Christian.
What is God Like?
God has every excellent attribute. He is infinite, meaning that He never had a beginning nor will he have an end. This is something ... Show more
He wanted man to be a free moral agent; having the choice between right and wrong. Man chose wrong, which caused pain, suffering, and death
entered the world as a result. God has power to stop evil, but it is because of His everlasting patience and grace towards us that He allows our sins to
continue. God did not want to end sin yet, because He did not want to lose anyone. A 2 Peter 3:9 puts it, "The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise,
as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
What happens to man at death?
What happens to believers and unbelievers at death is very different. For believers, death is not a punishment. After a Christian dies, the soul of that
person goes into God's presence, where they wait until Jesus' second coming to go to heaven. In Heaven, there is no suffering, death, and grief. In
heaven, the believers worship and praise God forever, and also partake in meaningful work. After an unbeliever dies, their soul goes to hell. When
Jesus returns, they experience the second death, which is eternal torment. Hell is a place of fire and burning, where unbelievers go through weeping
and gnashing of teeth.
What is the meaning of

The Seventh Man Is Wrong Essay
Imagine being responsible for your best–friend's death. Along with the seventh man, this is how a lot of survivors that have been through traumatic
experiences feel. "Blameworthiness, here, depends on the idea that a person could have done something other than he did. And so he is held
responsible or accountable, by himself or others."(The Moral Logic of Survivor's Guilt). The Seventh Man spent 40 years of his life living with
survivor's guilt for what happened to K. In order to accept the reality of what happened on the day of the typhoon, the seventh man must forgive
himself for not being able to save K. "I'm getting out of here!" I yelled to K. He was maybe ten yards down the beach, squatting with his back to me,
and looking at something. I was sure I had yelled loud enough, but my voice did not seem to have reached him." (The Seventh Man). The Seventh
Man should stop blaming himself for what happened to K, because he made an attempt to get K's attention before the wave came. Even though he
could get K. to safety in time, he still yelled for him to get off the beach. The seventh man wasn't only... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Get out of there! The wave is coming!" This time my voice worked fine...He tried to run, but now there was no time to run. In the next instant, the
wave had swallowed him. "(The Seventh Man). Some may say that the Seventh Man should feel guilty for turning around as soon as he couldn't
get K's attention and letting him get swallowed up by the wave, however he did what he could at the time and spent 40 years of his life regretting
his decisions. "At the end of the year I pleaded with my parents to let me move to another town. I couldn't go on living in sight of the beach where K.
had been swept away, and my nightmares wouldn't stop. If I didn't get out of there, I'd go crazy".(The Seventh Man). The Seventh Man thought about
not being able to save K. He was consumed by guilt and regret to the point of not being able to stay in his own

The Guilt Of Murder In Edgar Allen Poe's Tell-Tale Heart
When people commit murder, they try to justify their actions with logical reasons for doing so. However, if the reasons are not valid, they try to
convince themselves that they are. The short story "Tell–Tale Heart" by Edgar Allen Poe describes the actions of an unknown narrator who cunningly
murders an elderly man at midnight because of his vulture eye. The narrator recounts the confidence in his finesse of the concealment of the body until
he hears the first unperceived thumping of the dead man's heart, driving him to confess to the police. His frantic attempts to convince the reader of his
justification of the murder and that he is not insane creates suspense that leaves the reader at the edge of their seats at the moment of his ... Show more
One might object here that the narrator lacked the mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong. The claim of mental insanity could be supported by
the narrator's abnormal hearing of the dead old man's heart thumping. "...but the noise arose over all and continually increased. It
grew–louder–louder–louder!" (Poe). It is correct that normal people do not hear dead people's hearts beating, however, what he likely heard was the
sound of his own heart ringing loudly in his ears due to his guilty conscience.
The various instances where the narrator described how afraid he felt when staring at the man's vulture eye specifies that he indeed did have a
motive to kill the old man. In the beginning, he stated that he cared for the old man, but his eye that resembled a vulture frightened him. "...his
blood ran cold" (Poe). His obvious discomfort and contempt when looking at the eye irked him so much that he killed the elderly man to purge the
mere thought of the evil eye from his mind. To add on, every night for eight nights, he would sneak into the old man's room to wait for the
quintessential time to commit the final deed of killing him. However, the narrator had to wait several days to strike because as the old man was
sleeping, his eye was not open and his eye was the true object that vexed him. "...but I found the eye always closed...it was impossible to do the work"
(Poe). On the eighth night, the old man heard a noise, making

Wrong Place Wrong Time By Rob Cipriano
Wrong Place, Wrong Time A hero is someone who "we" determine to have demonstrated behaviors and decisions that are ethically and emotionally
worthy of our awe.(Huffpost, Author: Rob Cipriano). What if you were in the wrong place, at the wrong time? What if you were wrongfully
convicted? What if you were compared to an hog because of your lack of education? I believe jefferson was a hero because he saw light even in the
midst of darkness. He learned to believe in himself and not what people thought of him. Pg.7 Jefferson's defense attorney spoke so degrading about
Jefferson to the jury, "Look at him––look at him––look at this. Do you see a man sitting here? Do you see a man sitting here?

All Men Make Mistakes In Antigone
"Think: all men make mistakes, But a good man yields when he Knows his course is wrong, And repairs the evil: The only Crime is pride."
This is a quote from the play Antigone. The question validity is not a simple one. There are many different opinions upon if this this applies to
everybody. I find this to apply to everyday life.
All men do make mistakes, and women. There is no such thing as someone who doesn't make mistakes. Mistakes are apart of human nature. The
definition of mistake is an action or judgement that is misguided or wrong. The problem with this definition is the act of being wrong is an opinion.
There are over seven billion people in this world, not everyone has the same opinion. What may be wrong to one

The Guilt Of Premeditated Murder In Edgar Allan Poe's...
"True! – nervous – very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?" (Poe). In "Tell–Tale Heart," Edgar Allan
Poe illustrates that the narrator has an acute need of the old man's vulture eye and eventually murders the man on the eighth night. The author
highlights the events of the murder and soon, the narrator confesses to the police of his guilt. As Edgar Allan Poe fabricates this short story, he
enthralls the readers by giving the events specific detail. If Edgar Allan Poe were to ever continue the story where the narrator would be put on trial,
he would be guilty of premeditated murder. The reason for this is because the narrator cunningly planned the murder, had a motive of killing the old
man, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the narrator was criminally insane, he wouldn't be deceptively kind to the man everyday before the night of the murder. Also, some characteristics
of criminally insane is that you would lack the mental capacity, would not know the difference between right and wrong, and finally you wouldn't be
able to control your actions. If the narrator ever lacked the mental capacity, he wouldn't be able to plan out what he was going to do. From the
perspective of the premeditated murder side, he planned out what he was going to do. For example, if he was criminally insane, he would not be
deceptively kind to the old man, he would just not talk to him for the rest of the week and eventually the old man would suspect something.
The second reason why he is guilty of premeditated murder is that he had a motive. A motive to assassinate the old man. In the short story, the
author clearly states that he had a motive to kill the old man. Such as, "It is impossible to say how first the idea entered my brain; but, once
conceived, it haunted me day and night." The narrator clearly said that at first, he had the idea to do the deed. When the narrator had a motive, he
decided to make a plan that lasted for about a week. If this was a premeditated murder, an insane man would not have a motive to kill the man or even
thought about it. The insane man would go and kill the man right

The Trolley Case : An Ethical Thought Experiment
Tess Martin PHI 2630–009 (Fall 2017) October 17, 2017 985 Words Consequentialism The Trolley Case is an ethical thought experiment that seeks
to find the "right" solution in killing people. This thought experiment explains that there is a train coming down the tracks on course to run right
into five people. You stand next to a lever which can switch the tracks so that only one person will die. The only options you have are to do
nothing and allow five people to die, or pull the lever so that only one person will die. In Trolley Case 2, you can save five people from the train by
pushing a large man off of a bridge, and into the path of the train. This man would be large enough to stop the train, thus saving the other five people's
lives.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A Utilitarian might agree with the consequentialist. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism which requires an action to, "Maximize welfare
where the welfare of all individuals who will be affected by some action counts," (Timmons, 7). An action is "right" or "wrong" based on whether
or not it makes people happy or if it positively impacts their welfare. In the Trolley Cases, more people will end up alive if the train is diverted; this
creates a situation that maximizes the welfare of people. A Utilitarian would surely divert the train, or push the man off the bridge, to ensure their
actions create the maximum amount of happiness in society. There would be more suffering from the victims and their family members if five
people died compared to that if just one person died. According to consequentialism, there is an inconsistency if one is to divert the train and not
push the man off of the bridge. One simply cannot be willing to sacrifice one life and not another. To pull the lever in Trolley Case 1 and sacrifice
one person instead of five is essentially the same thing as pushing the man off of the bridge in Trolley Case 2. There is not morally relevant difference
in these two situations

Social Reality And Its Effect On Self Image
The idea that humans internalize their cultures' social norms to a degree at which these norms affect their self–image is a long debated argument
among many social sciences. From psychology to history, the idea of socialization has sprung a diverse variety of theories, all proclaiming that their
theory is the answer. All of these social theories provoke questions about social reality. Social reality is a complex evaluation of what is considered
biological reality and what is considered individual cognitive reality. These realities are created by social interaction thus influencing individual
motives and actions, so how can one theory answer it all. Dennis H. Wrong (1961), an American sociologist and professor ofsociology at New York
University, suggests that much like the question of social reality the answer is complex thus no single theory can correctly affiliate with all the
problems surrounding social reality.
Wrong's (1961) reflection on the one–sided answer of social reality is argued in his work published by the American Sociological Review, titled The
Over socialization Conception of Man in Modern Sociology. Wrong states "Sociological theory originates in the asking of general questions about
man and society. The answers lose their meaning if they are elaborated without reference to the question, as has been the case" (Wrong 1961:183)
Wrong later supports his claim by critiquing two of the leading theories on socialization, the Freudian view of man and the Hobbesian

Socrates Vs Plato Dualism
Morals, as defined by The Merriam–Webster dictionary, stands for " of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior". You can see the
evidence of morals in every activity, choosing to be honest or to lie, possessing respect or showing contempt, exhibiting kindness or inconsideration,
all are examples of moral code. Many may argue that there is dualism in the world, two opposing principles, either good or evil, and others may take
the stance of monism, stating that it is only necessary to choose one theory for your moral decision making. Well there are manymorality perspectives
we could look at I will narrow it down to Plato's theory of morality, which was one people always will do what is right when they know what is right. ...
The man contemplates, does he use the information and make himself extremely rich or not. The man goes ahead and uses the numbers and wins
the money, Just like anybody he's happy about winning but in the back of his mind he knows he cheated. A couple weeks pass and he's got the
money and he celebrating. Then he arrested along with his friend because they used inside information and now have to spend time in jail and give
back all the winnings including what the winner spent. I know that people do the wrong thing even if they know what is right because of greed. I
know that Plato would not agree with my example because he would see that the man was corrupted by another and somewhat prompted to do
wrong. Is my scenario a perfect representation of a choice between good or bad, no because there could be many ways where there could be different
variables like the man needed the money which could have influenced him to do wrong but for a good

Olympus Station
Olympus Station – Somewhere between Earth and Mars Six years ago...
"So what's the deal, Cap? You not gonna unwind a little bit while we're here?" Wyatt McKenzie looked at his young navigator and smiled slightly. At
six one, he stood considerably taller. "I'd just rather read a book and catch up on some sleep, Gavin."
"Read a book?" The young ensign shook his head. The flight terminal of the space station was packed – with humans and more. Gavin Teague was
barely in his twenties and had a headful of wavy black hair, unlike the bald McKenzie. His eyes scanned the crowds of people excitedly. "We've been
cooped up on that ship for nearly two weeks, Cap. The crew needs a chance to unwind more than the passengers do. Even you."
"We're schedule to return to Earth in three days," Wyatt reminded him.
Gavin followed his captain onto the tram platform and looked down the magnetic tracks to look for their transport. "With all due respect, sir, that's
three days from now. There's a lot of fun to be had between now and then." "Another three hundred passengers making their way back home from
here, Mars and beyond. We have plenty of work to do making sure the Agamemnon is shape before we do." Wyatt reminded him and he saw the young
man's shoulder slump in defeat. "Relax. That doesn't mean you don't deserve a break. It just means I'm too old to join you. Go have some fun. Meet
me at the hotel tomorrow

Seventh Man Essay: Objective Guilt
Seventh Man Essay "Objective guilt is when the guilt is fitting to one's action: guilt is appropriate because one acted to deliberately harm
someone, or could have prevented harm and did not". The Seventh man is a story about a man who is in a support group telling a story about his
friend K. he lost in large wave and years after the accident still feels guilty. Some people may believe after reading the fictional story that the
Seventh Man should not feel guilty that he did everything he could to save K. I think differently than those people and believe that you should feel
guilty. I believe that the Seventh Man could have done more to save his friend K. from being drowning and should not forgive himself. The Seventh
Man should not forgive himself for what happened to his friend K. because he could have done more. Not only could the seventh man have done
more, but he even basically said that he could have done more. In the story at one point it says, "I told myself to run over to K., grab hold of him, and
get out of there", then at another part... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, I believe that my views on the situation are the correct ones. For starters, I had said about how Spinoza wrote about things going
unexpectedly wrong, but even though things went wrong the Seventh Man still could have run over and grabbed his friend K. In a previous
paragraph I had said about how K. found himself running in the opposite direction away from K., this is another piece of evidence that shows that
the Seventh Man could have saved his friend K. The other side believes he is innocent because he had nothing to do with the wave and did not
physically harm K. However, he knew the wave was coming from previous signs, he knew K. could not hear him, and he knew he had time to run
over and grab K. to keep him from being submerged by the wave. The Seventh man easily could have saved his friend K. from being engulfed by the

Persuasive Essay On To Kill A Mockingbird
Have you ever done something because everyone else was doing that thing? Have you ever bought something because a friend or because everyone
else has that thing? In To Kill a Mockingbird: The Screenplay written by Horton Foote, Atticus Finch defends Tom Robinson an alleged rapist who was
an African American during theGreat Depression. Everyone told Atticus what he was doing was wrong, defending a black man during The Great
Depression. Tom Robinson was an innocent man in the Great Depression who's only case against him was that he was black and was seen near the
scene at the time when Mrs. Mayella was beaten. He was being unfairly tried and represented in the court just because he was an African American
during an extremely racist time in the South. Atticus saw it different than everyone else, he was the only one willing to believe Tom Robinson when
everyone else was saying he was wrong because he was a black man. Sometimes doing the right thing happens when everyone else is telling you are
wrong. Atticus Finch Believed in Tom Robinson when no one else did. Do what is right when everyone is telling you are wrong. When Atticus is
defending people, he will do whatever it takes to help that person out even if they can't afford his services. When Mr.Cunningham was needing
Atticus's services and couldn't afford them, Atticus came up with a way that would help him. Mr.Cunningham brought hickory nuts to Atticus in order
to pay off a legal debt. No one would help Mr.Cunningham, but Atticus saw that he was a good man and was worth fighting for him even though he
could not pay Atticus. He was the only one willing to help the poor in a time when almost no one had money. "He is paying me for some legal work I
did for him... That's the only way he can ... he has no money"(Foote page 7).Atticus understood that it was tough times for most people and that the
farmers had no money so he came up with a way for Mr. Cunningham to pay for his legal entailments when no else would help Mr.Cunningham. He
knew in his heart that helping Mr.Cunningham with his legal entailments was the right thing to do when no one else would help him. Everyone
thought only about themselves when Atticus was thinking about about the people in his

Character Analysis Of Tom Robinson In To Kill A...
In To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee she uses the characters to show the way the United States was back in the 1930's. By for shadowing a young
girls chilled hood and how this family has never done anything wrong in there lives so they are like mockingbirds so if you harm them its like a
sin. and like Tom Robinson who is a African American who had never done one thing wrong in his life and he is being convicted on a crime he
never did or was able to comfit because he is a carpal so when he is convicted its because of his collier witch is wrong so he is like a mocking bird
to.so it is pretty much saying that if you hurt someone that has never done anything wrong in there life then it is like a bad sin ans you are not a good
person. Atticus

Analysis Of Edgar Allan Poe's Tell Tale Heart
In the depths of the night, a loud shriek comes from a man who would later be assassinated and hidden under the floorboards of his own chamber. In
Edgar Allan Poe's Tell Tale Heart, the story of this murder is told from the point of view of the killer. The narrator tells of the man's vulture
–like eye,
which causes him to murder the man to rid himself forever of the villainy the eye possessed. After the murder, the narrator is haunted by the sound of
the man's beating heart to the point that he has to admit to his felony. In this ghastly tale, the narrator is guilty of premeditated murder because he had a
reason to kill the man, knew right from wrong throughout the story, and had a plan to kill the old man in advance.
To start, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to the fact that the narrator understood that murdering someone is wrong, the narrator has a motive for killing the old man. Right off the
bat, the narrator tells the reader why he wanted to kill the old man. He says, "I think it was his eye! yes, it was this! One of his eyes resembled that of
a vulture–a pale blue eye, with a film over it. Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees–very gradually–I made up my mind to
take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself of the eye for ever." This indicates that he had a clear rationale for killing the old man and is guilty
of first degree, or premeditated murder. Some may argue that the narrator is mentally insane and killed the man because over an irrational fear caused
by his mental illness. However, an insane person would not wait to terminate a powerful feeling of paranoia and to assassinate the person causing such
fear.
The idea that the narrator was patient enough to wait to kill the old man gives a final indication. As well as having a specific desire to assassinate the
elderly man, the narrator had a plan to go about his killing. This is exhibited when the narrator says, "I was never kinder to the old man than during
the whole week before I killed him." This is the first indication that he

Theoretical Problems Of Ethics And Ethics
Theoretical Problems of Ethics
Introduction
Ethics is the conception about the "right" and "wrong". It is related to the man and the society. It supports the concept of doing good things and
disgraces the thinking of behaving in the wrong way with others. It is the well–known fact that the ethics don't implement on the logics in doing right or
wrong. Along with sometimes it can stand against the morality. For example the death sentence is ethically wrong, because it takes the life of a man,
which can become the better part of society in future. So, ethically the death sentence should be stopped. But, the morally death sentence creates fear
among the people and they get the lesson for the future that who will be done wrong with others will face the death at the end.
Along with this, ethics has some theoretical problems. These problems are related to different aspects of ethics which are not justified on the basis of
philosophy. Most of the times these problems create confusion in the minds of human beings to identify what is right and what is wrong in certain
situations.
Three theoretical problems of ethics
Mainly ethics have three theoretical problems. First one is the problem of the origins of ethics which means it is a problem creating for the people to
find out that what is right and what is wrong. The Second one is the problem of relativism which holds the question that what is the relationship of
ethics with the society (Mizzoni, 2009). The third one is the problem

The Only Crime Is Pride Critical Lens
Reflection Essay The quote "Think: all men make mistakes, But a good man yields when he Knows his course is wrong, And repairs the evil: The
only Crime is pride," said by Teiresias. (This excerpt is from Antigone, by the classical Greek playwright Sophocles.) This quote can mean several
different things. It all depends on how you interpret it. I believe that Teiresias is explaining that a good man knows how to admit when he is wrong
and tries to fix the problem that his mistake has caused. "The only crime is pride." Teiresias is demonstrating the negative side of a man and what
"bad guys" do instead. There is no crime in being wrong, however, when someone's pride is blinding them from admitting their wrongs , then that is
when someone... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We are going to mess up. We were created to make mistakes so that way we could learn from them. It is our job to fix our miscalculations. Letting
your pride keep you from telling the truth will result in a worse outcome than the original predicament. Teiresias makes it clear that it is alright to
make mistakes, but trying to cover the mistakes up is not the right thing to do. Think about it, every time you choose to tell a lie you have to tell
1,000 more just to cover up the first lie. Wouldn't it just me easier to tell the truth? It takes a good man to confess his wrongs, those who can not
always find themselves in bad predicaments all the time. Telling the truth is always the way to go. I use to have the hardest time confessing the
things that I do incorrectly. It was hard for me to accept that I could mess up, but when I got older I started playing sports. Playing basketball and
soccer you have to confess to the things you did/do wrong or otherwise you will not be able to improve as a player. Now I am the first to admit what
I have done before my coaches even have the time to acknowledge what I did wrong. This makes the situation easier and makes my coaches job
simpler as

Mr. Gefish Case Study
It was just an ordinary day for Julia at work. She worked at the FBI as an investigator, but had not received a case in five weeks. Everyday, she
thought about going on cool missions with her partner Sam, but he has been busy doing an investigation on this lady that claims she didn't kill her
daughter. All she did for the three weeks was sit at a desk and look up people for her coworkers to assist with their case. Looking up people can be very
boring since there might be a long list of facts about he or she. One case required her to research a man named Mr. Gefish. She found out he is one of
the most dangerous man in the US and is known for selling drugs. Later in the day, her boss, Mr. Smith told her to come to the briefing room because
he has a new assignment for her. She was hoping for a chance to go undercover or find weird artifacts that links to a mystery.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
She sat down in her chair and waited for her boss to brief her about the next mission. Mr.Smith said, "As you all know, all of you have been looking
up certain people for a good reason. This reason has to link to your next assignment. Julia you have been looking up facts about Mr. Gefish and
Boris you have been studying a new drug that can cure any disease. Both of you will be an undercover drug store salesman because one of Mr.
Gefish's worker will deliver the drug to Maxwell Rowman, but we will find Rowman and take him to our headquarters and investigate him on why
he needs the drug. The delivery is set for tonight at 10, so be ready by six so we can suit you guys up and go over the basic attacks. This meeting is
dismissed. "Everyone hurried out of the meeting room and went back to

Gay Marriage Right or Wrong
Gay Marriage Right or Wrong
There are so many ethical issues that are continuously debated and still there has been no resolution. Gay Marriage is an ethical issue that has been
debated for years. This is an issue that I think that will continue to be debated as a clear answer as to why it is morally wrong has yet to be determined.
For so long a deontological view has been applied to the subject. Those who are opposed to same sex marriage take on this view. I do not think that a
deontological view will solve the issue of whether same sex marriage is right or wrong. However I do fee l that taking on a perspective brought to the
issue by relativism will assist in giving an understanding of why it is important that we ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And allowing gay marriage will only open the door to more broken homes.
On the other hand when taking on a relativism perspective on can argue that children that are raised in same sex parent households are no
different from those raised in a traditional household. Same sex marriage has not only been argued by those who oppose as only being a union
between man and woman. Those opposed can also argue that marriage is not between two people (a man and woman) but of those not related.
This brings in the argument of the what deontologists would support " The Slippery Slope" argument, which argues that allowing same sex
marriage will only lead us down a slope that welcomes incest and polygamy. Those who support this also feel that if gay marriage is allowed that
it would threaten the institution of marriage. I disagree with this argument. I feel that now days a person is going to do what they want. As long as
there are two consenting adults then gay marriage should be allowed. Same sex couples want to be married for the same reasons as heterosexual
couple. I do not feel that allowing gay marriage says hey you can now marry your brother or sister etc. Although it's not talked about a lot there are a
lot of people who practice polygamy. There are different cultures and countries where it is the norm to have more than one wife and it is perfectly
fine. So I do not think this is a slippery slope. Taking a relativism approach when examining the

Analyzing Kohlberg's Moral Reasoning
Kohlberg wanted to know how our moral reasoning changes as we get older, and he wanted to know how people decide the difference between right
and wrong. To get the answer to his questions he read a story containing a moral dilemma to boys of different age groups. The story consisted of a
man that could not afford to pay for a drug that his wife needed to treat her cancer, so he decides to break into the pharmacy to steal the drug. Kohlberg
then asked the group of boys to decide whether they think the man was right or wrong, however we was no interested in if they thought the man was
right or wrong, he wanted to know their thought process to deciding whether the man was right or wrong. Children in the pre conventional stage of
development (youngest

Antigone By Sophocles: Poem Analysis
The moral compass of planet Earth intends to point north at all times. This isn't always the case. People make mistakes, and others immediately judge
their decision. Are they right, or are they wrong? If they are right, then perfect –– no harm done. If they are wrong feelings of guilt and shame may
overcome. It is at this moment in time where the wrongdoer needs to make a decision in accordance to their actions. In an excerpt from Antigone, by
the classic Greek playwright Sophocles, the wise Teiresias observes, "Think: all men make mistakes, But a good man yields when he Knows his
course is wrong, And repairs the evil: The only Crime is pride." Teiresias statement is valid. The time period in which this poem was written does not
remove its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And repairs the evil" Instead of worrying over being perfect, there is a much easier title to strive for: 'a good man'. In this line of the poem, the
definition of a good man is someone who recognizes the wrong. For example, if a person in a court case knows for a fact that they committed a
crime, they must accept their fate. All other judgement become irrelevant. By definition, accepting the faults makes a better person than those who
lie about them. "The only Crime is pride." At school, work, or even now at home with the help of social media, reputation is a big deal.
Reputations illustrate who we are as a whole. It is the job of the repute to not let any of that success, or maybe failure, get to their head. A true deed
means well when it goes unnoticed. The only time it is necessary to be noticed is when the deed falls short of good meaning. The action is a mistake.
Then, the reputation and pride has to be swallowed in order to learn and develop as a better person.
Wherever a moral compass points, its magnetic north will always intend to pull it back to north. The direction of progress, success, good will. From
this poem, today's world can learn a lot about the functioning a compass. Pride is in the wrong direction, and if Antigone has taught us anything, all we
have left to do is learn from that wrong. Suck it up buttercup, mistakes are meant to be

How Morals Were Shaped Through The Creation Stories
How morals were shaped through the creation stories in the book of Genesis "The first principle of value that we need to rediscover is this: that all
reality hinges on moral foundations. In other words, that this is a moral universe, and that there are moral laws of the universe just abiding as the
physical laws" (Martin Luther King Jr.). Everyone around the world, regardless of gender, race, religion, and political views are defined by their own
moral compass. The decisions that people make are heavily influenced by their own unique moral compass that was shaped through the culture and
societal norms exposed around them. In particular, the book Genesis describes the creation of man and through their creation, brings forth the ideal...
However, this creation story raises multiple questions regarding
Huynh 2 morality in today 's contemporary beliefs. Before, people may blindly take it that God is always right and that we should obey Him
because we will be severely punished if we disobey. Now, people in general have become more open minded and analytical with what they read.
For instance, the story depicts that the reason why Adam and Eve were punished because they ate the fruit that gave them knowledge of right and
wrong. However, Adam and Eve did not know the difference between right and wrong before eating the fruit. For example, after eating the fruit,
Adam and Eve knew it was wrong for them to be naked and tried to cover themselves. So was it right for God to punish Adam and Eve when they
did not know that it was right or wrong to disobey Him? Is it moral to punish those who do not understand what is right and wrong, much less
differentiate the two? In fact, the first story in Genesis shows how destructive God can be to those who do not obey His commands which raises
questions about morality to the reader. Depending on the reader 's interpretation, the story influences their moral compass. Several interpretations
could be: "It is morally wrong to disobey God and to disobey God means we will face dire consequences" or "It is morally wrong to disobey God, but
was it unjust for God to punish those who are ignorant of what is

The Fat Man And The Trolley Car Dilemma Essay
There is a runaway train headed towards five people; however, by you being on a bridge watching above you are unable to reach the lever next to
the train. A large individual is right beside you, but you realize if you were to push him off the bridge and onto the tracks the train will hit and kill
him. Since his body is chubby it will stop the train from touching the five people. There are options, one of them is if you do not push the fat man
the train will hit and kill five people. If you push the fat man, the trolley will hit and kill one person saving five. This dilemma can be solved by
applying the deontological, and teleological principles to "The Fat Man and the Trolley Car" dilemma. Based on the principle of deontological ethics,
taking action that has reprehensible effects killing another person whether it is right or wrong but, teleological ethics command that some choices cannot
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Deontological ethics is a theory that uses rules distinguish right from wrong. The principles of this theory are based on duties, and rights, and respects
individuals. It focuses on rules and obligations. Deontological theories of ethics associated with a philosopher named Immanuel Kant, who believed
ethical actions follow the moral laws such as don't lie, cheat, steal or kill. Deontological comes from a Greek word deon meaning obligation or
duty–based ethics are the type of ethics that does what it does regardless of the outcome, and logos means to study, unlike, consequential or
utilitarianism that seeks to make decisions morally that will provide the most amount of happiness. What deontological ethics says is the morally right
answer to the question. Therefore, it seems more logical. An example of deontological that goes with "The Fat Man and The Trolley Car" is the belief
that killing an innocent person is

Homosexuality as a Sin Essay
Homosexuality as a Sin
The topic of homosexuality in religion has many sides. There are those who believe that it is a sin in God's eyes and according to the Bible, and
there are those who believe the God and the Bible are not specific to homosexuals. It is a tough debate based on whether you are a religious person,
how you were raised, and where your morals and ethics stand. You cannot truly believe one way without taking into account the other side and have
valid proof to back it up.
Those who believe that homosexuality is wrong do so by quoting certain phrases from the Bible. For example:
Romans 1:24–27; Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
God never created man to be with another man. God created a woman, Eve, out of Adam. God's will is for every man to have a woman. God has
created man out of his own image, and his image is not a homosexual man. According to the Bible, you are this image until you sin, and
homosexuality is considered a sin, and therefore homosexuality is wrong because God did not create man for man, but for woman and the purpose of
procreation. Any other type of relation is wrong in the eye of God.
On the other hand, the Bible also states:
I John 4:7–11, "Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God, and everyone that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not,
knoweth not God, for God is love." The bible tells us that a man cannot serve two masters, for either he will love the one and hate the other. If this is
true, you cannot follow God and hate another. If so, you to are a sinner.
According to the Bible, God totally hates the sin of homosexuality, but God does not hate you. He only hates your sin. Is it correct then to say that
you can agree with God and disagree with the homosexual lifestyle but still love all of God's children, even those who are gay? If this was true and
everyone followed this, we would have no problems with anti–homosexual groups and "gay bashers". If you are a person who follows the teachings of
God, then you cannot hate homosexuals. If you do, then you are, in your own interpretations of the bible, also a

What Is The Moral Satire In The Mysterious Outsider
In the Mark Twain story "The Mysterious Stranger", Philip Traum, also known as Satan, teaches Theodor that the Moral Sense that humans possess is
more of an impairment than a gift. The first time Satan degrades Man's Moral Sense is when he uses the term to explain the difference between
himself and Man. Theodor, who was ambivalent about what the Moral Sense was, became upset at the way Satan speaks of it. Theodor feels offended at
first, but then Satan's charisma and tricks gives Theodore mixed feelings. To sway Theodor's feelings, Satan shows Theodor several examples of the
cruel things Man does that no other animal on Earth would do. Satan makes the claim that although man was given the Moral Sense to differentiate
between right and wrong, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Satan compares humans to sheep, and says that they mostly follow others and tend to follow the aggressive and pitiless minority, afraid
to assert themselves. Man's Moral Sense leads him to follow others since he has the preconceived notion that if everyone does it, then it must be the
right thing to do. He explains that Man alone is "kind–hearted and shrink from inflicting pain, but in the presence of the aggressive and pitiless
minority they don't dare to assert themselves." He says that we go to war for no apparent reason and "it is unjust and dishonorable, as there is no
necessity for it", but Moral Sense drives us to it. Satan exclaims that "Man is to me as a red spider is to an elephant". He says that an elephant may
live a century, while a red spider's life is rather ephemeral. Man may think that Moral sense makes him above the other animals, and closest to God, but
Satan explains Man is nothing to him and he cannot get to that remote level of Man. Satan also makes the claim that the distinction between Man and
him is immeasurable as Man has no intellect. Moral Sense drives Man to do immoral things, making him "libel the higher

Who Is Ezra And Me?
It was difficult to survive without self–preservation, and I believed all things were fair in love and war. I don't know what drive men like Ezra and me,
Marco to do the things we do. I may be looked upon as the villain of this love story, but the way I saw it, I am merely did what must be done in order
for justice to be served. Each person has their place in this world– some as leaders and others as followers.
Ezra was known an honest CEO of a powerful company, and a strong man who had a story of rags to riches. However, despite his renowned wealth
he was still an outsider who did not fit into the society that he strived to be part of.
***
It was a gloomy day in the Upper East Side. The traffic was minimal, as the sky filled up with gray clouds; it looked like it was going to rain. The
wind brought an eerie chill towards the direction of two men who could be spotted in the distance, walking down the sidewalk.
"Marco, I love the beautiful Mona. I cannot believe she slipped away. How could she have chosen such a man, when I love her," confessed Rodrigo.
"Spencer, he is not a fit man for the position he holds. And for god's sake he has chosen Chuck for the new position. Chuck should have never gotten
the job, and Ezra shouldn't even be my boss," I responded. "I cannot deal with this misery, this weight that is crushing me. If Mona's brother, Ben knew
that his beloved sister was sleeping around with another while he sat undisturbed by this news, he'd have a heart

Why Is It Morally Permissible To Turn The Runaway Trolley
To begin with, the Trolley case is an experiment where you are put into a situation where you are on a runaway trolley where the breaks do not work
and you are headed for five people and you can either hit the five people, killing them or save them by turning the trolley hitting one person and
killing him. There is another scenario called the Footbridge case where you are in the same situation but in order to save the five people you have to
push a fat man off a bridge stopping the trolley. This is very interesting experiment that questions human ethics and morality. It makes you think
whether or not it is morally permissible to turn the trolley. I argue that there is an important moral difference between the Trolley case and the
Footbridge case because there is a difference between letting someone die to save people and killing someone to save people. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I disagree with Thompson that it would be impermissible to re–direct the trolley because even though in both cases one person dies from an action you
take, the action has different moral standards of reason of what is right and what is wrong. Most people agree that it is morally permissible to turn
the trolley killing the one man to save people five and it is wrong to push a fat man from a bridge to save five people. Most people believe this
because they know that there is a distinct moral difference between incidentally killing someone and intentionally killing someone. Intentionally killing
some one is a universal law that has serious consequences which is why people view pushing the fat man off the bridge as

Are Homeless People Right Or Wrong

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Are Homeless People Right Or Wrong