4. Company Overview
• IMG Midstream develops, owns and
operates small-scale natural gas fired
power generation projects in the PJM area.
(PJM is like SONI of Northern Ireland)
• Projects are strategically located to utilize
existing gas and electric infrastructure.
• Small-scale nature of our projects provides
flexible fast-start power generation
capacity to enhancing grid reliability.
• IMG has four 20 MW projects in operation
in Northeast Pennsylvania, with additional
projects planned for 2017+
• IMG’s equity sponsor is Bregal Energy, a
leading global investor in the U.S. and
abroad.
Confidential Material 4
5. IMG Advantages
• Small-scale projects providing for
broader market participation for fuel
supply and power purchases.
• Small project footprint (<2 acres)
providing for greater siting flexibility
and quick permitting.
• Project portfolio model enhancing
reliability and creating fuel, power
sale, and operating risk diversification.
• Scalable and repeatable project sizes
using proven technology.
• Use of locally produced natural gas,
further stimulating local economic
development.
Confidential Material
25-34.5kVSub-Transmission
25-34.5kVSub-Transmission
Fuel Source
20 MW Capacity
Midstream
Gathering System
5
20 MW Capacity
Fuel Source
6. Natural Gas Market Considerations
Confidential Material 6
7. Before the Shale Revolution
Gas delivered to the Northeast US via long-haul
pipes originating in Texas, Louisiana, Rockies,
and Gulf of Mexico
LNG imports on the rise, alleviating constrained
areas and prices
Pennsylvania was reliant on gas from distant
regions
Confidential Material 7
14. Impacts of the Shale Revolution
Focus on infrastructure build out
Long-haul pipes reversing flow, moving gas from
the Northeast to the South and West
LNG exports on the rise, more facilities
proposed
Gas demand on the rise especially in the power
generation sector
Confidential Material 14
21. Policy Considerations
National
– EPA Emissions Programs
• Clean Power Plan
• Mercury and Ozone standards
– Federal Tax Credits
– R&D
– Procurement
– Interstate Commerce – FERC
Little coordination amongst Federal and State
stakeholders with no comprehensive energy plan
adding market uncertainty
21
State
• PUC and DEP
• Alternative Energy
Portfolio Standards
(AEPS)
• Energy Efficiency and
Conservation
• Local Regulation
27. Power Generation in PJM
• Planned Generation
– 82,767.7 MW of capacity in the generation request queues for
construction through 2024
• Generation Retirements
– 29,192 MW have been, or planned to be, retired between 2011 and
2020
– 5,014 MW planned to retire after 2016 – 381 MW in first 6 mos. of 2016
• Coal units make up 37%
• First 9 months of 2016, total generation was:
– 33.8% from Coal units (-7.4% from 2015)
– 34% from Nuclear units (+0.2% from 2015)
– 27.4% from Gas units (+24.6% from 2015)
• First 9 months of 2016, marginal resources were:
– 44.3% coal units (-10% from 2015)
– 43.3% gas units (+10% from 2015)
Source: www.monitoringanalytics.com
27
29. California Duck Curve
Confidential Material
Source: greentechmedia.com
Fast-start resources
that can be started
multiple times
intraday are needed
in the market
30. IMG Project Attributes
• Super efficient gas engines
• Low emissions
• Fast-start (<5 minutes)
• Multi-engine configuration
• Low pressure gas
• Repeatable design
• Remote operations
Confidential Material
31. IMG Milan Facility
34 kV Distribution
Powerline
Marcellus
Pipeline
IMG Milan Energy, Bradford County, PA
* Milan is a 3-genset configuration
32. IMG Roundtop Facility
IMG Roundtop Energy, Susquehanna County, PA
* Roundtop is a 5-genset configuration
33. IMG Beaver Dam Facility
IMG Beaver Dam Energy, Bradford County, PA
* Beaver Dam is a 5-genset configuration
35. Contact Information
35
IMG Midstream LLC
North Shore Place I
358 North Shore Drive, Suite 201
Pittsburgh, PA 15212
www.imgmidstream.com
Jeanette Oliver
Vice President, Legal
Cell: 412-983-1563
Jeanette.oliver@imgmidstream.com
Ron J. Kiecana
Chief Business Development Officer
Cell: 704-996-9307
ron.kiecana@imgmidstream.com
Editor's Notes
Abundance of low cost natural gas is driving market towards investments in new natural gas power generation
Graph shows the fuel mix generation capacity making up PJM (think of as the Mid-Atlantic states), so not how much energy was produced each year, but what the mix of nameplate capacity is
While contributing to planned shutdowns of existing coal and nuclear plants that are near the end of their planned or useful life
Big spikes coincident with surge in oil commodity prices pre-recession
Projects related to PA = 10,962 MMcf/d from 2017 through 2018 (announced or filed with FERC).
Graph a little confusing, shows the amount of capacity added each year by fuel type, smoothed out a bit, so it’s not cumulative, just the amount coming online each year
Economic growth drives electricity utilization and power generation growth through 70’s
Arab oil embargos and move away from oil for power generation drives growth in 80’s
Stagnant growth in 90’s (shock from cost overruns on nuclear power and uncertainty of move toward deregulation)
Stagnant growth in 90’s, coupled with improvements in gas generation tech drives huge spike in gas power gen around year 2000
Overbuild leads to two things, not much growth in 2000’s and huge need for LNG imports due to anticipated domestic supply shortfalls
From an environmental perspective, for several decades, increases in emissions have been coupled with economic growth
Early 2000’s about 15 BCF of LNG import capacity was authorized by US gov’t
Gasprom set up an office in Houston, thinking they’d be selling LNG to US utilities
- Growth in the use of electricity has muted over last decade and expected to hover around 1% moving forward