In light of the 9 Dec. 2009 (today) Gregoire proposed budget, I have made this PowerPoint. I find it ironic that today the Washington Policy Center warned that the state's bond rating was in trouble at http://bit.ly/6r5qkx just a short while after I-1033 was deemed a threat to it. Can't be a one-way street folks, I voted NO on that initiative and I hope we in Washington State can balance our budget better in the future. Let's remember that Moody's noted that: ----------------------- What would change the rating - UP *Sustained trend of structural budget balance, plus restoration and maintenance of strong reserve levels. *Economic expansion and improved industry diversification. *Reduction of debt ratios to levels closer to Moody's 50-state medians. What could change the rating - DOWN *Deeper and longer recession that restrains consumer confidence, leading to prolonged revenue weakness and employment erosion. *Protracted structural budget imbalance. *Increased reliance on one-time budget solutions. *Cash flow narrowing, leading to strained liquidity. *Failure to adopt plan to cover expenditures once federal fiscal stimulus monies are no longer available. ----------------------- Clearly raising taxes, "protracted structural budget imbalance" and "Increased reliance on one-time budget solutions" is not the way forward unlike what Gov'r Gregoire pushed today on Dec. 9th, 2009. Instead, "sustained trend of structural budget balance, plus restoration and maintenance of strong reserve levels" as well as "reduction of debt ratios to levels closer to Moody's 50-state medians" (read spending cuts) is best.