SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 56
Download to read offline
Introduction to and Scope of the
Underwater Munitions Issue
1
October 2010
Geoff Carton
CALIBRE Systems, Inc/Support Contractor
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for
Environment, Safety and Occupational Health
2
Highlights
• Terminology
• Site types
• Scope
• UWM distribution
• Munitions 101
• Conceptual model
• Projects
• Corrosion research
• References
Important Munitions-Related
Terms
3
Military Munitions
Military munitions means all ammunition products and
components produced for or used by the armed forces for
national defense and security, including ammunition products or
components under the control of the Department of Defense, the Coast
Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard. The term
includes confined gaseous, liquid, and solid propellants; explosives,
pyrotechnics, chemical and riot control agents, smokes, and incendiaries,
including bulk explosives, and chemical warfare agents;
chemical munitions, rockets, guided and ballistic missiles, bombs,
warheads, mortar rounds, artillery ammunition, small arms ammunition,
grenades, mines, torpedoes, depth charges, cluster munitions and dispensers,
demolition charges; and devices and components thereof.
(10 U.S.C. 101(e)(4)(A) through (C))
4
-- Military munitions are, by definition, only US munitions
Discarded Military
Munitions (DMM)
DMM are military munitions that have been abandoned
without proper disposal or removed from storage in a
military magazine or other storage area for the purpose of
disposal. The term does not include UXO, military munitions that
are being held for future use or planned disposal, or military munitions that
have been properly disposed of, consistent with applicable environmental
laws and regulations.
(10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(2))
5
Unexploded Ordnance
Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) – Military munitions that
(A) have been primed, fuzed, armed, or otherwise prepared for
action;
(B) have been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a
manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installations,
personnel, or material; and
(C) remain unexploded whether by malfunction, design, or any
other cause.
(10 U.S.C. 101(e)(5)(A) through (C))
• DMM were taken from storage for disposal
and have less chance of functioning
than UXO 6
Munitions Constituents
Any materials originating from unexploded
ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions
(DMM), or other military munitions, including
explosive and non-explosive materials, and
emission, degradation, or breakdown
elements of such ordnance or munitions.
(10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(3))
7
UWM Site Types
• Live-fire testing and training ranges (operational; former)
– Surface munitions (e.g., bombs, artillery projectiles)
– Subsurface munitions (e.g., torpedoes, sea mines)
• Defensive sites (e.g., forts, coastal artillery batteries)
• Disposal sites
• Acts of war (e.g., combat sites, sunken vessels)
• Accident sites (e.g., Port Chicago)
• Emergencies (e.g., jettisoned munitions)
8
9
Island Targets
Former Culebra Training Area, Cayo Alkazar Target
10
Littoral Training Areas
Bahia Tamarindo Hondo, Former Culebra Training Area
11
Flooded Ranges
Former Camp Maxey
Disposal Sites
12
Scope of UWM in US Waters
13
Disposal Sites
(Pacific)
14
Source: Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09 Defense
Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress (www.denix.osd.mil)
Disposal Sites
(Atlantic and Gulf)
15
Source: Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09 Defense
Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress (www.denix.osd.mil)
16
Distribution of Munitions
17
18
Munitions Distribution
Fixed Firing Position
• Distribution exhibits a
clear, predictable pattern
• Munitions present will
determined based on
records review and
weapons used at site
• Records may be more
complete than for bombing
ranges or disposal sites
325,000
325,000
330,000
330,000
335,000
335,000
340,000
340,000
4,600,000
4,600,000
4,605,000
4,605,000
4,610,000
4,610,000
4,615,000
4,615,000
4,620,000
4,620,000
4,625,000
4,625,000
UTM Easting (m)
UTMNorthing(m)
NAD 83
Zone 17N
anomalies/acre
11-20
21-40
81-110
41-60
61-80
Erie Army Depot
Over the Side Disposal
19
Disposed Munitions
20
• Loose disposal
– Meandering trails from
a ship underway
– Trails by munitions type
– Items fairly evenly spaced
• Consolidated in hulks
– Little dispersion of munitions
– Items in contact
– Possible galvanic coupling
– Better documentation on
quantities
Hawaii Undersea Military Munitions Assessment (HI-05)
Sonar Survey – loose disposal
Consolidated Disposal
21
Munitions 101
22
Munitions 101
• Families of ammunition
• Energetic materials
• Explosive train
• Munitions fillers
• Bomb components
• Projectile components
23
Families of Ammunition
• Small Arms
• Artillery
• Bombs
• Grenades
• Rockets
• Mines
• Pyrotechnics
• Guided Missiles and Large Rockets (GMLR)
24
Energetic Materials and
Purpose
• High Explosives: Blast, Fragmentation
• Propellant: Propulsive Energy
• Pyrotechnics: Fireworks, Signals
• Incendiary: Initiate Fires
25
Energetic Materials
Explosives Propellants Pyrotechnics
Primary Secondary
Inorganic Organic
Single Base
Double Base
Triple Base
Composite
Flares
Smoke
Tracers
Incendiaries
Explosive Train
• Most munitions contain more than one type of
energetic material
• Energetics are arranged in a particular order called
an “explosive train”
26
Explosive Train
• Sequence of energetic materials begin with priming or
initiating material (primer or fuze), through boosting
material, and finally to the main charge
• Sequence is typically from low-yielding, but very
sensitive material (primary explosive) to a high-yielding,
but not as sensitive material (high explosive)
FUZE BOOSTER MAIN CHARGE
High Sensitivity Low
Small Quantity Large
PRIMER PROPELLANT
Explosive Train - Propelling
Primer is initiated by external source (e.g., firing pin,
electric current)
Output from the primer (flame) initiates the igniter
Output from the igniter initiates the propellant
28
Primer Igniter
tube
Propellant
grains
Types of Fillers
• High Explosive
• Incendiary
• Chemical or industrial
agents
• Illumination (pyrotechnics)
• Screening or smoke
• Sub-munitions
• Inert Items
• Riot Control Agents
Components of Bombs
30
Booster
Body
Filler
Components of Artillery
Munitions
Detailed information
on materials is
often available
• Body - steel
• Rotating band –
copper
• Fuze – steel or
brass
32
Conceptual Corrosion and
Release Model
33
Theoretical Distribution of
Releases from Numerous Items
34Figure after MEDEA, 1997
Initial release - Transient at time of disposal from failure of items
T1 – Corrosive attack on munitions and formation of pinholes
T – Period of maximum release likely to be an extended period
Corrosive Disintegration Period T1 T
Initial Release
Time (decades)
NumberofMunitionsOpened
Primary
Release
Release of Low Solubility Fill
35
Content of munitions released over an extended period and is a continuing
source of munitions constituents
Figure after MEDEA, 1997
Release of High Solubility Fill
36
Fill of munition rapidly enters water column
Figure after MEDEA, 1997
Projects
37
Hawaii Undersea Military Munitions
Assessment Program (HUMMA, HI-05)
• Develop efficient and cost effective method for
characterizing munitions sea disposal sites
• Deep water site – approximately 400 meters
• South of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
• SONAR survey of about 70 km2
• Manned submersibles and ROVs used
• Seawater, sediment and biota collected and analyzed
• Report available (www.hummaproject.com)
• Additional SONAR survey planned for 2011 to south of
original study area
38
HUMMA Photographs
HUMMA Conclusion
on Corrosion
• Deterioration level ranged from almost pristine to
virtually disintegrated
• Varied within similar munition types in the same general
area, as well as between different types of munitions
spread over a wide region
• Generally, munitions with thicker casings were better
preserved
• Most munitions were not obviously breached
• Many had “skirts” or columnar “pedestals” beneath that
appear to be the result of rusting, possibly in combination
with leakage of internal MC 40
HUMMA “Pedestals”
41
M47 Bomb
• 16,000 M47A2 100-lb
mustard filled bombs
disposed in 1944 south of
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
• 40% were leaking at time
of disposal
• Painted body made of
0.061 in (1.5 mm) thick
sheet steel
• Several possible M47
bombs observed at a depth
of about 1,800 feet 42
Possible M47 Bombs
Off Hawaii
43
Possible M47 Bombs
44
Ordnance Reef (HI-06) Projects
• Army and Navy funded NOAA survey (2006) to obtain
screening-level data of potential explosives safety and
human health risks
• DASA(ESOH) established (2007) Ordnance Reef
Coordinating Council (mirrors TPP)
• University of Hawaii completed (2009) two rounds of
sampling (Remedial Investigation (RI))
to address data gaps
– Focus on human health
– Screening level ecological risk assessment
• RI (sampling results) report expected in
early 2011
• Outreach efforts - expanded
45
Ordnance Reef Projects
• NOAA:
– Ocean current monitoring
• Shallow (under 300 feet) and deep (about 8,000 feet) sensor
networks collected data over a 1 year period
• Data being used to develop a model to predict fate of potential
release
• Incorporating data into UH circulation models and export to NOAA
3D fate and transport models
• Final report expected by mid-2011
– Pre-removal coral survey completed, with recommendations
for minimizing impacts to coral to be provided in Nov/Dec
2010
46
47
Ocean Current Monitoring
48
Deep Water Site
~ 8,000’
• Current speed
• Current direction
Ordnance Reef Projects
• Army Environmental Quality Technology Program
demonstrations (Apr 11) of commercial technology:
– Adapted from oil exploration technology for the remote
recovery of sea disposed munitions
– NOAA input used in order to minimize impacts of recovery
on coral
– Barge mounted technology (existing and innovative) for
destruction of recovered munitions
49
Corrosion Research
50
Early Corrosion
Rate Predictions
• Estimates based on corrosion
rate and wall thickness
• Materials include carbon or
wrought steel, aluminum
(6061), and brass alloys
• Steel bodied munitions
46 – 749 years
• Aluminum M55 – 2 years
• Ton container – 539 years
51
Epstein, et al, 1973
Corrosion of 1-Ton Containers
• NASA/Army Research Laboratory study
• Major factors affecting
corrosion are:
– Dissolved oxygen
– Temperature
52Reference: NASA/ARL, Analysis of the Effects of Sea
Disposal on a One-Ton Container, July 2007
NASA/ARL Conclusions
• Difficult to bracket life expectancy of containers
• To improve confidence of prediction using existing
data need:
– Thorough survey of literature on deep-water corrosion in
order to learn about specific characteristics
– Specific account of materials, construction techniques and
processes (e.g., welding process, mill scale present)
– Types of coatings and processes, and relative age and
condition prior to disposal
– Comprehensive literature review of case studies involving
similar materials (such as with shipwrecks) should be
performed
53
Best References on Ranges
References on individual sites:
• Formerly Used Defense Sites Reports
• Defense Environmental Programs, Annual Report to
Congress, Munitions Response Site Inventory
(deparc.xservices.com/do/mmrp)
• Service historical offices
• Nautical charts
54
Best References on Disposals
Most up-to-date data on quantities and locations of disposals
• Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09
Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress
(www.denix.osd.mil)
Overview of issue
• U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean:
Background and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research
Service Report RL33432, 2007
• Munitions Dumped at Sea: A Literature Review,
Beddington and Kinloch, Imperial College London 2005
(http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/77CEDBCA-813A-4A6C-8E59-
16B9E260E27A/0/ic_munitions_seabed_rep.pdf)
55
56
Contact Information
Geoff Carton
CALIBRE Systems, Inc/Support Contractor
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health
Geoff.Carton@calibresys.com

More Related Content

Similar to 2010 Introduction to and Scope of Underwater Munitions Issue

2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel
2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel
2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare MaterielGeoffrey Carton
 
Introduction to Weapon Ammunition
Introduction to Weapon AmmunitionIntroduction to Weapon Ammunition
Introduction to Weapon AmmunitionKew Sama
 
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster Revisited
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster RevisitedReality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster Revisited
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster RevisitedKurt D. Hamman
 
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptx
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptxLLW challenges and developments FINAL pptx
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptxPeter ORMAI
 
Iran’s nuclear program
Iran’s nuclear programIran’s nuclear program
Iran’s nuclear programRan Porat
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energySpringer
 
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of Slovenia
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of SloveniaBlaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of Slovenia
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of SloveniaGeneva Declaration
 
Le Trench DISPONET INTRO
Le Trench  DISPONET INTRO Le Trench  DISPONET INTRO
Le Trench DISPONET INTRO Peter ORMAI
 
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docx
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docxThe Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docx
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docxmamanda2
 

Similar to 2010 Introduction to and Scope of Underwater Munitions Issue (15)

seminar.pptx
seminar.pptxseminar.pptx
seminar.pptx
 
2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel
2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel
2007 Historic Overview Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel
 
Introduction to Weapon Ammunition
Introduction to Weapon AmmunitionIntroduction to Weapon Ammunition
Introduction to Weapon Ammunition
 
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster Revisited
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster RevisitedReality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster Revisited
Reality and Nature . . . The Challenger Disaster Revisited
 
Nuclear Weapons (1).pdf
Nuclear Weapons (1).pdfNuclear Weapons (1).pdf
Nuclear Weapons (1).pdf
 
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptx
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptxLLW challenges and developments FINAL pptx
LLW challenges and developments FINAL pptx
 
Iran’s nuclear program
Iran’s nuclear programIran’s nuclear program
Iran’s nuclear program
 
01 introduction
01 introduction01 introduction
01 introduction
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energy
 
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of Slovenia
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of SloveniaBlaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of Slovenia
Blaz Mihelic, Ministry of Defence of Slovenia
 
Le Trench DISPONET INTRO
Le Trench  DISPONET INTRO Le Trench  DISPONET INTRO
Le Trench DISPONET INTRO
 
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docx
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docxThe Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docx
The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics.docx
 
Nuclear weapon
Nuclear weaponNuclear weapon
Nuclear weapon
 
Manhattan project
Manhattan projectManhattan project
Manhattan project
 
NPS Thesis - Fitzpatrick
NPS Thesis - FitzpatrickNPS Thesis - Fitzpatrick
NPS Thesis - Fitzpatrick
 

More from Geoffrey Carton

3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011
3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 20113Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011
3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011Geoffrey Carton
 
2014 Newtowne Neck Park: A Slice of History
2014 Newtowne Neck Park:  A Slice of History2014 Newtowne Neck Park:  A Slice of History
2014 Newtowne Neck Park: A Slice of HistoryGeoffrey Carton
 
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituents
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituentsSummary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituents
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituentsGeoffrey Carton
 
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal WatersGeoffrey Carton
 
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of Munitions
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of MunitionsUS Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of Munitions
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of MunitionsGeoffrey Carton
 
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military Munitions
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military MunitionsFinal Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military Munitions
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military MunitionsGeoffrey Carton
 
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal WatersGeoffrey Carton
 
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater EnvironmentGeoffrey Carton
 
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…Geoffrey Carton
 
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...Geoffrey Carton
 
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach ToolboxGeoffrey Carton
 

More from Geoffrey Carton (12)

Bombs away
Bombs awayBombs away
Bombs away
 
3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011
3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 20113Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011
3Rs Explosives Safety Program Description -watered areas - 2011
 
2014 Newtowne Neck Park: A Slice of History
2014 Newtowne Neck Park:  A Slice of History2014 Newtowne Neck Park:  A Slice of History
2014 Newtowne Neck Park: A Slice of History
 
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituents
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituentsSummary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituents
Summary review of the aquatic toxicology of munitions constituents
 
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters
2014 Select Munitions Disposal Operations in US Coastal Waters
 
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of Munitions
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of MunitionsUS Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of Munitions
US Public law - Research on effects of Ocean Disposal of Munitions
 
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military Munitions
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military MunitionsFinal Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military Munitions
Final Report to Congress on US Sea Disposal of Military Munitions
 
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters
2013 Sea Disposal of Chemical Warfare Materiel in US Coastal Waters
 
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment
2012 Recent US Work Relating to Munitions in the Underwater Environment
 
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…
2011 Perspective on DoD’s Efforts Relating to Legacy Underwater Military Munit…
 
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...
Characterization Of Explosives Contamination at Munitions Manufacturing Facil...
 
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox
3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program Outreach Toolbox
 

2010 Introduction to and Scope of Underwater Munitions Issue

  • 1. Introduction to and Scope of the Underwater Munitions Issue 1 October 2010 Geoff Carton CALIBRE Systems, Inc/Support Contractor Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health
  • 2. 2 Highlights • Terminology • Site types • Scope • UWM distribution • Munitions 101 • Conceptual model • Projects • Corrosion research • References
  • 4. Military Munitions Military munitions means all ammunition products and components produced for or used by the armed forces for national defense and security, including ammunition products or components under the control of the Department of Defense, the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard. The term includes confined gaseous, liquid, and solid propellants; explosives, pyrotechnics, chemical and riot control agents, smokes, and incendiaries, including bulk explosives, and chemical warfare agents; chemical munitions, rockets, guided and ballistic missiles, bombs, warheads, mortar rounds, artillery ammunition, small arms ammunition, grenades, mines, torpedoes, depth charges, cluster munitions and dispensers, demolition charges; and devices and components thereof. (10 U.S.C. 101(e)(4)(A) through (C)) 4 -- Military munitions are, by definition, only US munitions
  • 5. Discarded Military Munitions (DMM) DMM are military munitions that have been abandoned without proper disposal or removed from storage in a military magazine or other storage area for the purpose of disposal. The term does not include UXO, military munitions that are being held for future use or planned disposal, or military munitions that have been properly disposed of, consistent with applicable environmental laws and regulations. (10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(2)) 5
  • 6. Unexploded Ordnance Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) – Military munitions that (A) have been primed, fuzed, armed, or otherwise prepared for action; (B) have been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material; and (C) remain unexploded whether by malfunction, design, or any other cause. (10 U.S.C. 101(e)(5)(A) through (C)) • DMM were taken from storage for disposal and have less chance of functioning than UXO 6
  • 7. Munitions Constituents Any materials originating from unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or other military munitions, including explosive and non-explosive materials, and emission, degradation, or breakdown elements of such ordnance or munitions. (10 U.S.C. 2710(e)(3)) 7
  • 8. UWM Site Types • Live-fire testing and training ranges (operational; former) – Surface munitions (e.g., bombs, artillery projectiles) – Subsurface munitions (e.g., torpedoes, sea mines) • Defensive sites (e.g., forts, coastal artillery batteries) • Disposal sites • Acts of war (e.g., combat sites, sunken vessels) • Accident sites (e.g., Port Chicago) • Emergencies (e.g., jettisoned munitions) 8
  • 9. 9 Island Targets Former Culebra Training Area, Cayo Alkazar Target
  • 10. 10 Littoral Training Areas Bahia Tamarindo Hondo, Former Culebra Training Area
  • 13. Scope of UWM in US Waters 13
  • 14. Disposal Sites (Pacific) 14 Source: Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress (www.denix.osd.mil)
  • 15. Disposal Sites (Atlantic and Gulf) 15 Source: Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress (www.denix.osd.mil)
  • 16. 16
  • 18. 18 Munitions Distribution Fixed Firing Position • Distribution exhibits a clear, predictable pattern • Munitions present will determined based on records review and weapons used at site • Records may be more complete than for bombing ranges or disposal sites 325,000 325,000 330,000 330,000 335,000 335,000 340,000 340,000 4,600,000 4,600,000 4,605,000 4,605,000 4,610,000 4,610,000 4,615,000 4,615,000 4,620,000 4,620,000 4,625,000 4,625,000 UTM Easting (m) UTMNorthing(m) NAD 83 Zone 17N anomalies/acre 11-20 21-40 81-110 41-60 61-80 Erie Army Depot
  • 19. Over the Side Disposal 19
  • 20. Disposed Munitions 20 • Loose disposal – Meandering trails from a ship underway – Trails by munitions type – Items fairly evenly spaced • Consolidated in hulks – Little dispersion of munitions – Items in contact – Possible galvanic coupling – Better documentation on quantities Hawaii Undersea Military Munitions Assessment (HI-05) Sonar Survey – loose disposal
  • 23. Munitions 101 • Families of ammunition • Energetic materials • Explosive train • Munitions fillers • Bomb components • Projectile components 23
  • 24. Families of Ammunition • Small Arms • Artillery • Bombs • Grenades • Rockets • Mines • Pyrotechnics • Guided Missiles and Large Rockets (GMLR) 24
  • 25. Energetic Materials and Purpose • High Explosives: Blast, Fragmentation • Propellant: Propulsive Energy • Pyrotechnics: Fireworks, Signals • Incendiary: Initiate Fires 25 Energetic Materials Explosives Propellants Pyrotechnics Primary Secondary Inorganic Organic Single Base Double Base Triple Base Composite Flares Smoke Tracers Incendiaries
  • 26. Explosive Train • Most munitions contain more than one type of energetic material • Energetics are arranged in a particular order called an “explosive train” 26
  • 27. Explosive Train • Sequence of energetic materials begin with priming or initiating material (primer or fuze), through boosting material, and finally to the main charge • Sequence is typically from low-yielding, but very sensitive material (primary explosive) to a high-yielding, but not as sensitive material (high explosive) FUZE BOOSTER MAIN CHARGE High Sensitivity Low Small Quantity Large PRIMER PROPELLANT
  • 28. Explosive Train - Propelling Primer is initiated by external source (e.g., firing pin, electric current) Output from the primer (flame) initiates the igniter Output from the igniter initiates the propellant 28 Primer Igniter tube Propellant grains
  • 29. Types of Fillers • High Explosive • Incendiary • Chemical or industrial agents • Illumination (pyrotechnics) • Screening or smoke • Sub-munitions • Inert Items • Riot Control Agents
  • 32. Detailed information on materials is often available • Body - steel • Rotating band – copper • Fuze – steel or brass 32
  • 34. Theoretical Distribution of Releases from Numerous Items 34Figure after MEDEA, 1997 Initial release - Transient at time of disposal from failure of items T1 – Corrosive attack on munitions and formation of pinholes T – Period of maximum release likely to be an extended period Corrosive Disintegration Period T1 T Initial Release Time (decades) NumberofMunitionsOpened Primary Release
  • 35. Release of Low Solubility Fill 35 Content of munitions released over an extended period and is a continuing source of munitions constituents Figure after MEDEA, 1997
  • 36. Release of High Solubility Fill 36 Fill of munition rapidly enters water column Figure after MEDEA, 1997
  • 38. Hawaii Undersea Military Munitions Assessment Program (HUMMA, HI-05) • Develop efficient and cost effective method for characterizing munitions sea disposal sites • Deep water site – approximately 400 meters • South of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii • SONAR survey of about 70 km2 • Manned submersibles and ROVs used • Seawater, sediment and biota collected and analyzed • Report available (www.hummaproject.com) • Additional SONAR survey planned for 2011 to south of original study area 38
  • 40. HUMMA Conclusion on Corrosion • Deterioration level ranged from almost pristine to virtually disintegrated • Varied within similar munition types in the same general area, as well as between different types of munitions spread over a wide region • Generally, munitions with thicker casings were better preserved • Most munitions were not obviously breached • Many had “skirts” or columnar “pedestals” beneath that appear to be the result of rusting, possibly in combination with leakage of internal MC 40
  • 42. M47 Bomb • 16,000 M47A2 100-lb mustard filled bombs disposed in 1944 south of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii • 40% were leaking at time of disposal • Painted body made of 0.061 in (1.5 mm) thick sheet steel • Several possible M47 bombs observed at a depth of about 1,800 feet 42
  • 45. Ordnance Reef (HI-06) Projects • Army and Navy funded NOAA survey (2006) to obtain screening-level data of potential explosives safety and human health risks • DASA(ESOH) established (2007) Ordnance Reef Coordinating Council (mirrors TPP) • University of Hawaii completed (2009) two rounds of sampling (Remedial Investigation (RI)) to address data gaps – Focus on human health – Screening level ecological risk assessment • RI (sampling results) report expected in early 2011 • Outreach efforts - expanded 45
  • 46. Ordnance Reef Projects • NOAA: – Ocean current monitoring • Shallow (under 300 feet) and deep (about 8,000 feet) sensor networks collected data over a 1 year period • Data being used to develop a model to predict fate of potential release • Incorporating data into UH circulation models and export to NOAA 3D fate and transport models • Final report expected by mid-2011 – Pre-removal coral survey completed, with recommendations for minimizing impacts to coral to be provided in Nov/Dec 2010 46
  • 48. 48 Deep Water Site ~ 8,000’ • Current speed • Current direction
  • 49. Ordnance Reef Projects • Army Environmental Quality Technology Program demonstrations (Apr 11) of commercial technology: – Adapted from oil exploration technology for the remote recovery of sea disposed munitions – NOAA input used in order to minimize impacts of recovery on coral – Barge mounted technology (existing and innovative) for destruction of recovered munitions 49
  • 51. Early Corrosion Rate Predictions • Estimates based on corrosion rate and wall thickness • Materials include carbon or wrought steel, aluminum (6061), and brass alloys • Steel bodied munitions 46 – 749 years • Aluminum M55 – 2 years • Ton container – 539 years 51 Epstein, et al, 1973
  • 52. Corrosion of 1-Ton Containers • NASA/Army Research Laboratory study • Major factors affecting corrosion are: – Dissolved oxygen – Temperature 52Reference: NASA/ARL, Analysis of the Effects of Sea Disposal on a One-Ton Container, July 2007
  • 53. NASA/ARL Conclusions • Difficult to bracket life expectancy of containers • To improve confidence of prediction using existing data need: – Thorough survey of literature on deep-water corrosion in order to learn about specific characteristics – Specific account of materials, construction techniques and processes (e.g., welding process, mill scale present) – Types of coatings and processes, and relative age and condition prior to disposal – Comprehensive literature review of case studies involving similar materials (such as with shipwrecks) should be performed 53
  • 54. Best References on Ranges References on individual sites: • Formerly Used Defense Sites Reports • Defense Environmental Programs, Annual Report to Congress, Munitions Response Site Inventory (deparc.xservices.com/do/mmrp) • Service historical offices • Nautical charts 54
  • 55. Best References on Disposals Most up-to-date data on quantities and locations of disposals • Chapter 10, Sea Disposal of Military Munitions, FY 09 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress (www.denix.osd.mil) Overview of issue • U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean: Background and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service Report RL33432, 2007 • Munitions Dumped at Sea: A Literature Review, Beddington and Kinloch, Imperial College London 2005 (http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/77CEDBCA-813A-4A6C-8E59- 16B9E260E27A/0/ic_munitions_seabed_rep.pdf) 55
  • 56. 56 Contact Information Geoff Carton CALIBRE Systems, Inc/Support Contractor Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Geoff.Carton@calibresys.com