Teaching Practice

1. The Development of Language: A Critical Period in Humans
Many animals communicate by means of sound, and some (humans and songbirds are
examples) learn these vocalizations. There are, in fact, provocative similarities in the
development of human language and birdsong (Box B). Most animal vocalizations, like
alarm calls in mammals and birds, are innate, and require no experience to be correctly
produced. For example, quails raised in isolation or deafened at birth so that they never
hear conspecifics nonetheless produce the full repertoire of species-specific vocalizations.
In contrast, humans obviously require extensive postnatal experience to produce and
decode speech sounds that are the basis of language.
Birdsong. Anyone witnessing language development in a child cannot help but be amazed
at how quickly learning takes place. This facility contrasts with the adult acquisition of a
new language, which can be a painfully slow process that never produces (more...)
Importantly, this linguistic experience, to be effective, must occur in early life. The
requirement for hearing and practicing during a critical period is apparent in studies of
language acquisition in congenitally deaf children. Whereas most babies begin producing
speechlike sounds at about 7 months (babbling), congenitally deaf infants show obvious
deficits in their early vocalizations, and such individuals fail to develop language if not
provided with an alternative form of symbolic expression (such as sign language; see
Chapter 27). If, however, these deaf children are exposed to sign language at an early age
(from approximately six months onward), they begin to “babble” with their hands just as a
hearing infant babbles audibly. This suggests that, regardless of the modality, early
experience shapes language behavior (Figure 24.1). Children who have acquired speech
but subsequently lose their hearing before puberty also suffer a substantial decline in
spoken language, presumably because they are unable to hear themselves talk and thus
lose the opportunity to refine their speech by auditory feedback.
Manual “babbling” in deaf infants raised by deaf, signing parents compared to manual
babble in hearing infants. Babbling was judged by scoring hand positions and shapes that
showed some resemblance to the components of American Sign Language. (more...)
Examples of pathological situations in which normal children were never exposed to a
significant amount of language make much the same point. In one well-documented case,
a girl was raised by deranged parents until the age of 13 under conditions of almost total
language deprivation. Despite intense subsequent training, she never learned more than a
rudimentary level of communication. This and other examples of so-called “feral children”
starkly define the importance of early experience. In contrast to the devastating effects of
deprivation on children, adults retain their ability to speak and comprehend language even
if decades pass without exposure or speaking. In short, the normal acquisition of human
speech is subject to a critical period: The process is sensitive to experience or deprivation
during a restricted period of life (before puberty) and is refractory to similar experience or
deprivations in adulthood.
On a more subtle level, the phonetic structure of the language an individual hears during
early life shapes both the perception and production of speech. Many of the thousands of
human languages and dialects use appreciably different repertoires of speech elements

2. called phonemes to produce spoken words (examples are the phonemes “ba” and “pa” in
English). Very young human infants can perceive and discriminate between differences in
all human speech sounds, and are not innately biased towards the phonemes
characteristic of any particular language. However, this universal appreciation does not
persist. For example, adult Japanese speakers cannot reliably distinguish between the /r/
and /l/ sounds in English, presumably because this phonemic distinction is not present in
Japanese. Nonetheless, 4-month-old Japanese infants can make this discrimination as
reliably as 4-month-olds raised in English-speaking households (as indicated by increased
suckling frequency or head turning in the presence of a novel stimulus). By 6 months of
age, however, infants show preferences for phonemes in their native language over those
in foreign languages, and by the end of their first year no longer respond to phonetic
elements peculiar to non-native languages. The ability to perceive these phonemic
contrasts evidently persists for several more years, as evidenced by the fact that children
can learn to speak a second language without accent and with fluent grammar until about
age 7 or 8. After this age, however, performance gradually declines no matter what the
extent of practice or exposure (Figure 24.2).
A critical period for learning language is shown by the decline in language ability (fluency)
of non-native speakers of English as a function of their age upon arrival in the United
States. The ability to score well on tests of English grammar and vocabulary (more...)
A number of changes in the developing brain could explain these observations. One
possibility is that experience acts selectively to preserve the circuits in the brain that
perceive phonemes and phonetic distinctions. The absence of exposure to non-native
phonemes would then result in a gradual atrophy of the connections representing those
sounds, accompanied by a declining ability to distinguish between them. In this
formulation, circuits that are used are retained, whereas those that are unused get weaker
(and eventually disappear). Alternatively, experience could promote the growth of
rudimentary circuitry pertinent to the experienced sounds.
The reality, however, is considerably more complex than either of these scenarios
suggest. Experiments by Patricia Kuhl and her colleagues have demonstrated that as a
second language is acquired, the brain gradually groups sounds according to their
similarity with phonemes in the native language. For example, when asked to categorize a
continuous spectrum of artificial phonemes between /r/ and /l/, native English speakers,
but not Japanese speakers, tend to perceive sounds as all sounding like either /r/ or /l/, a
phenomenon that Kuhl has likened to a “perceptual magnet.” Related but varying sounds
(defined by their audiographic spectrum) are evidently grouped together and eventually
perceived as representing the same phoneme. Without ongoing experience during the
critical period, this process fails to occur. Interestingly, the “baby-talk” or “parentese” used
by adults speaking to young children actually emphasizes these phonetic distinctions
compared to normal speech among adults. Thus, learning language during the critical
period for its development entails an amplification and reshaping of innate biases by
appropriate postnatal experience.
By agreement with the publisher, this book is accessible by the search feature, but cannot
be browsed.
Copyright © 2001, Sinauer Associates, Inc.