This document is a summary of a physics colloquium given by Flip Tanedo at UC Riverside on October 22, 2018 about dark matter theory. The colloquium discussed the history of the weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) as a leading dark matter candidate, treating it as a piece of historical fiction. It described how the WIMP arose from attempts to solve problems in particle physics in the 1990s, such as the hierarchy problem, and came to predict the correct abundance of dark matter through the "WIMP miracle." However, as WIMPs have yet to be directly detected, the talk suggests it is now more productive to explore non-WIMP dark matter models.
1. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
Flip Tanedo
22 OCT 2018
UC Riverside Particle Theory
T H E W I M P I S D E A D
LO N G L I V E T H E W I M P
T O W A R D A T H E O R Y O F D A R K M A T T E R
f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
&
2. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
2
the plan
dark matter in dark times
WIMP, from the lens of historical fiction
post-WIMP dark matter
Learning Objectives
What we really mean by a “WIMP”
What we really mean by “WIMPs are dead”
Why it’s okay to move on from WIMPs
3. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
3
Who discovered water?
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/12/23/water-fish/
I don’t know. But it probably wasn’t a fish.
Status of dark matter.
4. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
4
The first dark matter: Neptune
Astronomical observations + theory → missing stuff
Image: Magnus Manske via Wikipedia U. Le Verrier; hubpages.com/
education/The-Drama-of-Neptunes-Discovery
5. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
5
f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
The Second Dark Matter: Vulcan
6. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
6
Astro + Cosmo: Dark Matter Exists
5%
27%
68%
Standard Model is not complete
GALACTIC
ROTATION CURVES
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND
Images: Jeff Filippini (Berkeley Cosmology 2005), NASA APOD 2006, NASA WMAP
This talk: new particle(s)
THIS IS A CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION
BUT: THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS!
7. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
7
Current status
via Jorge Cham & Daniel Whiteson
One of the top two
recent books to use
comic illustrations to
share what it’s like to be
a physicist.
… this audience already
knows the other one!
now in paperback!
8. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
Figure 27.1: WIMP cross sections (normalized to a single nucleon) for spin8
Direct Detection
PDG Dark Matter Review 2018
9. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
9
“WIMP Dark Matter is dead”
Weakly-Interacting Massive Particle
(This means different things to different people!)
10. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
10
A model of dark matter
pixabay.com/en/crime-scene-chalk-outline-29055/
g
Z
DA R K M AT T E R
I N T E R ACT I O N
Properties:
spin, mass
Interactions with visible matter
(has to stay dark)
+ a reason to be stable
11. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
11
“Just parameter fitting, right?”
PDG 2018
16 27. Dark matter
Figure 27.1: WIMP cross sections (normalized to a single nucleon) for spin-
independent coupling versus mass. The DAMA/LIBRA [72], and CDMS-Si
enclosed areas are regions of interest from possible signal events. References to the
experimental results are given in the text. For context, the black contour shows a
scan of the parameter space of 4 typical SUSY models, CMSSM, NUHM1, NUHM2,
pMSSM10 [73], which integrates constraints set by ATLAS Run 1.
Table 26.1 summarizes the best experimental performances in terms of the upper limit
on cross sections for spin independent and spin dependent couplings, at the optimized
WIMP mass of each experiment. Also included are some new significant results (using
Argon for example).
In summary, the confused situation at low WIMP mass has largely been cleared
DA R K M AT T E R
mass
g
Z
interaction strength
(which one?)
12. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
12
A model of dark matter
pixabay.com/en/crime-scene-chalk-outline-29055/
g
Z
DA R K M AT T E R
I N T E R ACT I O N
Properties:
spin, mass
Interactions with visible matter
(has to stay dark)
+ a reason to be stable model-building required
13. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
13
the plan
dark matter in dark times
WIMP, from the lens of historical fiction
post-WIMP dark matter
this is historical science fiction
A collective mis-remembering of history
whose fiction hopefully engenders a
deeper truth.
14. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
14
A useful historical starting point
PHYSICS REPORTS
ELSEWIER Physics Reports 267 (1996) 195-373
Supersymmetric dark matter
Gerard Jungmana, Marc Kamionkowskib,“, Kim Griestd
aDepartment of Physics, syyacuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. jungman@npac.syr.edu,
bDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. kamion@phys.columbia.edu,
‘School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540. USA,
aDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. kgriest@ucsd.edu
Received June 1995; editor: D.N. Schramm
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Dark matter in the Universe
2.1. Inventory of dark matter
2.2. Theoretical arguments
2.3. Baryonic content of the Universe
2.4. Distribution of dark matter in the Milky
198
206
206
209
211
6.4. Fermion final states
6.5. Gluon final states
6.6. Photon final states
6.7. Summary of neutralino annihilation
7. Elastic-scattering cross sections
7.1. The basic ingredients
252
256
258
259
260
260
Caveat emptor: what follows is a piece of historical fiction
15. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
15
Particle Physics, 1990s
/ /
¯ / − /
¯ / /
/ −/
¯ / −
/
/
( ) ( )
fundamental forces
matterparticles
or something to explain
unitarity of WW scattering
16. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
16
The Hierarchy Problem
Why is the Higgs light?
FT, Quantum Diaries, “The Hierarchy Problem” (2012)
17. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
17
A favorite answer: supersymmetry
matter particle force particle
force particle matter particle
N E W PA R T I C L E SElegant solution to hierarchy problem
18. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
18
Preventing Proton Decay
¯d
¯u
e¯d,e¯s,e¯b
4 1
Q
L
¯u ¯u
by squarks. Arrows indicate helicity and should not be confu
Dirac spinors [14]. Tildes indicate superpartners while bars
cles into left-chiral fields in the conjugate representation.
ion of this is to impose the above constrai
PR = ( )3(B L)+2s
,
n of the field. Conservation of matter parity
)2s
factor always cancels in any interaction
rm has an even number of fermions. Ob
erpartner fields have R-parity 1. (This
grams assocaited with electroweak precisi
parity requires pair-production of superp
PR[ ordinary matter ] = +
PR[ superpartner ] = −
Added bonus: the lightest superpartner is stable.
19. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
19
The story so far: SUSY
mh ?
SUSY New Particles
p+ stability
R-parity
?
Dark Matter !
20. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
20
Variant: extra dimensions
mh ?
XD New Particles
precision
observables
KK-parity
?
Dark Matter !
free in
flat XD
warped
XD
21. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
21
Variant: compositeness
mh ?
composite New Particles
T-parity
?
Dark Matter !
precision
observables
22. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
22
SUSY Dark Matter: Neutralino WIMP
g
Z
DA R K M AT T E R I N T E R ACT I O N
spin-1/2
mass ~ 100 GeV
Stable due to R-parity
~ 0.6
“ W E A K S CA L E ”
“ W E A K S CA L E ”
lightest superpartner
combination of photon, Z,
Higgs partners
weak scale mass
weak scale couplings
23. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
23
How much dark matter is there?
1 10
equilibrium
time ~ mass / temp
[comoving]numberdensity SM
SM
SM
SM
=
… so there is
no dark matter
E Q U I L I B R I U M
A N N I H I L AT I O N
SM
SM
24. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
24
How much dark matter is there?
1 10
equilibrium
freeze out
time ~ mass / temp
[comoving]numberdensity
SM
SM
H U B B L E
A N N I H I L AT I O N
WIMP prediction: relic abundance of dark matter
[ neutralino & cousins ]
25. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
25
The “WIMP Miracle”
capture
SM
SM
Z
“WEAK SCALE” MASS
~100 GeV
WEAK
FORCE
annihilation vs. expansion of universe
⌦ h2
⇠
0.1 pb
h annvi
“WEAK SCALE”
ANNIHILATION RATE
OBSERVED AMOUNT OF
DARK MATTER TODAY
If dark matter interacts through electroweak (W, Z, h) bosons,
then it automatically has roughly the correct abundance
26. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
26
The “WIMP Miracle”
mh ?
SUSY New Particles
p+ stability
R-parity
?
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
27. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
27
The “WIMP Nightmare”
mh ?
SUSY New Particles
p+ stability
R-parity
?
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
predictions
nomorefreeparameters
28. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
28
“WIMP Complementarity”
Dark matter searches related by crossing symmetry:
How Dark Matter talks to the Standard Model
..
χ
.
χ
.
sm
.
sm
..
χ
.
sm
.
χ
.
sm
..
sm
.
sm
.
χ
.
χ
ANNIHIL
ATION
DI
RECT DETECTIO
N
COLLIDER
INDIRECT DIRECT COLLIDER
Standard ModelDark MatterANNIHIL
ATION
COLLIDER
D I R E C T
WEAK FORCE
29. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
29
“WIMP Complementarity”
Dark matter searches related by crossing symmetry:
How Dark Matter talks to the Standard Model
..
χ
.
χ
.
sm
.
sm
..
χ
.
sm
.
χ
.
sm
..
sm
.
sm
.
χ
.
χ
ANNIHIL
ATION
DI
RECT DETECTIO
N
COLLIDER
INDIRECT DIRECT COLLIDER
Standard ModelDark MatterANNIHIL
ATION
COLLIDER
D I R E C T
WEAK FORCE
R E L I C A B U N DA N C E YO U ’ R E K I L L I N G M E N OT G R E AT, E I T H E R
30. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
30Figure 27.1: WIMP cross sections (normalized to a single nucleon) for spin
PDG Dark Matter Review 2018
weak scale coupling
weak scale mass
31. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
31
adapted from Getty Images
* neutralinos with the most natural parameter choices
32. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
32
Is the neutralino WIMP dead?
Technically? No.
Linguistically? No.
Experimentally? No.
Emotionally? Yes.
The WIMP is dead to me.
Hiding places in mass, mixing;
many parameters, conspiracies
Ambiguity in meaning of “weak”
not necessarily electroweak
if dark matter is a WIMP,
we know how to find it
and we’re actively searching
more interesting: what if dark
matter isn’t a WIMP at all?
Experimental program is probing
previously unexplored models
n.b. analogous to “SUSY is dead”
33. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
.
er talks to the Standard Model
..
χ
.
sm
.
χ
.
sm
..
sm
.
sm
.
χ
.
χ
33
Defining the WIMP
SPECIFIC GENERAL
interacts through
W and Z bosons
interactions with
visible matter have
a “small” coupling
interactions with
visible matter are
electroweak-scale
“One parameter”
contact interactions
many interactions, only
dark-visible must be small
neutralinos e.g. axions?
SM singlet
particle
e.g. connected
to naturalness(motivated) (arbitrary)
“everything is
a WIMP!”
WIMP Miracle
34. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
34
the plan
dark matter in dark times
WIMP, from the lens of historical fiction
post-WIMP dark matter
Why there are still theorists working on dark matter
light mediators as an example of a better
phenomenological framework
35. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
35Andrew Grant, Science News, June 2013
36. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
36
Phenomenology post-2013
1. Waiting for Godot. (Ambulance chasing mode)
2. Brave New World. (Lamp post mode)
top-down
model building
37. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
37
f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
Ambulance Chasing Mode
If this is true, then
dark matter must …
38. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
38
f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
Image: Alex Perez, via expertphotography.com/low-key-photography-dramatic-lighting/
Lamp-Post Mode
Where can we look for
dark matter?
Where are we not looking?
39. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
39
Example: Light Mediators
e
e
e
e
e
capture
annihilation
x xA0
A0
INDIRECT DIRECT COLLIDER
Standard ModelMediator
N N
q
q
ANNIHIL
ATION
COLLIDER
D I R E C T
Dark Matter
can keep thermal relic!
40. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
40
New Searches with Light Mediators
e
e
e
e
ee
ee
e e
capture
annihilation
A0
A0
INDIRECT DIRECT MEDIATOR PRODUCTION
N N
ANNIHIL
ATION
COLLIDERD I R E C T
A0
A0
Halo Morpholo
• SIDM particles follow the
0 2 4 6 8
0
2
4
6
8
R HkpcL
zHkpcL
constant density contours
Kaplinghat, Linden, Keeley, HBY (2013) (P
C
d
SELF
Standard ModelMediatorDark Matter
SM
SM
SM
SM
accelerators astro
R E L I C
A B U N DA N C E
41. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
41
Step 1: Mediator Production
A
A0
e
e
A
e
N N
A0
e
EXAMPLES OF LIGHT MEDIATOR PRODUCTION STRATEGIES
annihilation bremsstrahlung
Others: Drell-Yan, nuclear transitions, Higgs decays, …
⇡0
=
1
p
2
u¯u d ¯d
meson decay
42. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
42
Step 2: Mediator Decay
43. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
43Adapted from 1608.08632, 1608.03591, N. Toro at Dark Sectors 2017
InteractionwithStandardModel
Mediator Mass A0
prompt
displaced
vertex
LIMITED BY
STATISTICS
LIMITED BY
VERTEXING
existing bounds
44. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
44
Remixing dark phenomenology
UNCHANGED
ANNIHILATION
SCATTERING
PRODUCTION
HALO SHAPE
INDIRECT
DETECTION
DIRECT
DETECTION
COLLIDER:
MISSING
ENERGY
NUCLEAR
TRANSITIONS
NEUTRON STAR
HEATING
COMPOSITE
MEDIATOR
HALO
PROFILES
BEAM DUMP &
FIXED-TARGET
CAPTURE & ENHANCED ANNIHILATION
PROCESS CLASSIFICATION
ANNIHILATION
TO ON-SHELL
MEDIATORS
LIGHT MEDIATORS SOME OF MY PERSONAL INTEREST...
SELF
INTERACTION
45. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
45
Example: remixing complementarity
1
2
3 4
J. Feng, J. Smolinsky, FT 1509.07525
46. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
46
Recap: WIMP
mh ?
SUSY New Particles
p+ stability
R-parity
?
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
predictions
nomorefreeparameters
46
x
47. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
47
“WIMP is dead… to me”
mh ?
SUSY New Particles
p+ stability
R-parity
?
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
predictions
nomorefreeparameters
47
x
48. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
48
“WIMP is dead… to me”
?
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
predictions
48
?
49. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
49
Beyond the WIMP
Dark Matter
with correct
abundance
predictions
49
Fix couplings
How’d it
get here?
Constraints?
Anomalies?
new particlesUV theory?
etc …
ANNIHIL
ATION
COLLIDER
D I R E C T
Halo Morphology: Milky Way
• SIDM particles follow the stellar distribution
0 2 4 6 8
0
2
4
6
8
R HkpcL
zHkpcL
constant density contours
Correlation between the stellar
distribution and the SIDM distribution
pheno.
theory
50. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
50
f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
Image: Alex Perez, via expertphotography.com/low-key-photography-dramatic-lighting/
post-WIMP lamp posts
Dark sectors (light mediator)
Low-mass dark matter
Macroscopic dark matter
Primordial black holes
Gravity is very weird
…
opportunities for unique
search strategies!
51. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
51
Extra Slides
52. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
52
Renormalizable Portals
Dark Matter Mediator
Standard ModelU(1)’
Standard
ModelHiggs
Dark Matter Mediator
Standard
Model
⌫R
Kinetic
Mixing
Dark
Matter
USEFUL BENCHMARK
+ variations of each portal, motivated dim-5 portals, …
53. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
53
What is theoretical science?
gravity from
missing stuff
Haven’t
seen it
in the lab
current theory
of particle physics
54. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
54
What is theoretical science?
Haven’t
seen it
in the lab
current theory
of particle physics
gravity from
missing stuff
new particle:
dark matter
55. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
55
What is theoretical science?
A “complete” theory that
includes previous knowledge
& new observations
previous
knowledge
gravity from
missing stuffprediction
56. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
56
Theorist’s roadmap to tenure
HACK
full theory
predictions
interpretation
consistency
57. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
57
Example of an LHC Search
Krovi, Low, Zhang (1807.07972)
27TeV (15ab-1)
27TeV
(1.5ab-1)
100TeV (100ab-1)
100TeV
(30ab-1)27TeV (15ab-1)
27TeV (1.5ab-1)
MZ'=2M χ
MZ'=6αeffM χ
/π
2
Darkonium
territory
Monojet
territory
14TeV
(300fb-1)
14TeV
(3ab-1)
Z' dijet
search excl.
50 100 500 1000
20
50
100
200
500
Mχ (GeV)
MZ'(GeV)
αD=0.5, gq=0.1
Figure 1: Colorful curves show the future high-energy pp collider constraints on the model where
0
58. f l i p . t a n e d o @ u c r . e d u 50USC PHYSICS COLLOQUIUM FALL 2018
58
17 MeV Beryllium Bump
UCI IPC 1608.03591
1.03 MeV
10 keV width
18.15 MeV
138 keV width
STATUS: INDEPENDENT EXP. CHECK REQUIRED