The document describes a study that compared five different contractors who used various methods to remove invasive melaleuca trees from five parcels of land totaling over 72 hectares. The contractors used methods like manual cutting, tracked feller bunchers, aerial herbicide application, and whole tree chippers. The study analyzed metrics like the area treated, total cost, cost per hectare, biomass removed, tree population density, and potential biomass revenue for each contractor to determine treatment effectiveness and cost-efficiency. The document concludes with considerations for further analysis, such as evaluating regrowth over time and conducting additional validation studies.
2. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 1
Method of Treatment
Future American Corporation
Use Inmate Labor
Shear trees and cut manually with chainsaws
Treat stumps with herbicide
Trees Moved to Staging Area
Chipped
Loaded onto trucks
Delivered to Prisons or Power Plant
Treatment has not Started
3. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 2
Method of Treatment
Habitat Restoration Resources
Cut Down and Spray trees
Tracked Feller Buncher
Move Debris to Project Boundaries
Shovel Loader
Chip Trees w/ Whole Tree Chipper
Haul chips away
Remove Remaining saplings
Gyro Trac Forestry Mower
Hand Labor to Treat Stumps w/ Herbicide
Retreat Site in 6-8 weeks for Re-growth
8. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 3
Method of Treatment
Applied Aquatic Management, Inc.
Use Hand Labor
Cut Trees with Chainsaws
Treat stumps with Herbicide Application
Remove seedlings
Do Not Remove Melaleuca Biomass from
Site
10. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 4
Method of Treatment
Florida Environmental Clearing
Knock Trees Down and Mulch into Ground
Clear-More Tree Chipper Stumper
Leave Site in Level Condition
Re-treat Re-Growth Aerially within One
Year
11. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 4
Clear-More Tree Chipper Stumper
Knocking Down Trees
12. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 4
Clear-More Tree Chipper Stumper
Grinding /Mulching
13. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 4 - After Treatment
Remaining
Natives
Ground
Rutting
14. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Parcel No. 5
Method of Treatment
Helicopter Applicators
Aerially Broadcast herbicide over Parcel
Innermost 180 Acres Treated
Method used to compare low cost of aerial
treatment method
15. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 1
14.49 15.18 15.58 16.19
72.84
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
H
e
c
t
a
r
e
s
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat
Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida
Environmental
Clearing
5. Helicopter
Applicators
Parcel No. & Contractor
Parcel Area Treated (Hectares)
16. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 2
$58,000.00
$99,400.00
$70,199.53
$75,190.00
$51,411.70
$0.00
$10,000.00
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$40,000.00
$50,000.00
$60,000.00
$70,000.00
$80,000.00
$90,000.00
$100,000.00
$
1. Future
American
Corporation
2. Habitat
Restoration
Resources
3. Applied
Aquatic
Management,
Inc.
4. Florida
Environmental
Clearing
5. Helicopter
Applicators
Parcel No. & Contractor
Total Contract Cost ($)
17. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 3
$4,003.46
$6,550.06
$4,505.72 $4,645.05
$705.80
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
$
/
H
e
c
t
a
r
e
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat
Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida
Environmental
Clearing
5. Helicopter
Applicators
Parcel No. & Contractor
Total cost ($/Hectare)
18. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 4
876.22
2081.81
1160.89
2240.12
0.00
500.00
1000.00
1500.00
2000.00
2500.00
M
e
t
r
i
c
T
o
n
s
o
f
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida Environmental
Clearing
Parcel No. & Contractor
Total Biomass per Parcel (metric tons)
19. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 5
20,133.33
31,400.00
37,000.00 37,066.67
0.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
25,000.00
30,000.00
35,000.00
40,000.00
#
o
f
T
r
e
e
s
P
e
r
H
e
c
t
a
r
e
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat
Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida
Environmental
Clearing
Parcel No. & Contractor
Population Density
20. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
$66.19
$47.75
$60.47
$33.57
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$
/
M
e
t
r
i
c
T
o
n
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida Environmental
Clearing
Parcel No. & Contractor
Total Cost $ Per Metric Ton of Biomass
Results 6
21. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Results 7
$2,628.67
$6,245.44
$3,482.68
$6,720.37
$0.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$5,000.00
$6,000.00
$7,000.00
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
$
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1. Future American
Corporation
2. Habitat Restoration
Resources
3. Applied Aquatic
Management, Inc.
4. Florida Environmental
Clearing
Parcel No. & Contractor
Possible Biomass Revenue (Market Value $3 /
Metric Ton)
22. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Future Considerations
Develop method to Analyze Re-Growth as an
indicator of Method Effectiveness
Analyze Costs to Treat Re-growth in each Parcel
Prepare Estimates for Each Contract Using
Industry Standard Estimation Software – Analyze
Contract Costs
Are Contract Amounts Accurate
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Good of Future
American Corporation’s Method
Repeat Research on Similar Parcel of Land to
Validate using $/Amount of Biomass Method of
Comparison
23. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY - ENVIRONMENTAL MBA PROGRAM
Acknowledgements
Francois LaRoche , SFWMD
Project idea, mentoring, and opportunity to continue
developing project
Thai Van, USGS
Assistance reproducing Standing Biomass methods and
interpreting biomass data
Linda Yarrish, SFWMD
Data collection
Gordon Baker, SFWMD
Data collection