Co-production of evidence resources of value to commissioners
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•647 views
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (19)
Similar to Co-production of evidence resources of value to commissioners
Similar to Co-production of evidence resources of value to commissioners (20)
More from Kieran Lamb
More from Kieran Lamb (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Co-production of evidence resources of value to commissioners
- 1. Working Smarter for Better Health Co-production of evidence resources of value to commissioners Kieran Lamb & Lis Edwards Cheshire and Merseyside CSU Working Smarter for Better Health
- 2. Working Smarter for Better Health Annual Status Review and the need for Co-production Evidence Narrative Data
- 3. Working Smarter for Better Health The Model Working Smarter for Better Health ASR Data Information Evidence Process
- 4. Working Smarter for Better Health Co-production utilises CSU skill sets • Business Intelligence identify core issues •Quality and Performance provide narrative •Evidence Services locate content for the innovation opportunity analysis • Transformation support implementation of innovation
- 5. Working Smarter for Better Health It's all about the numbers • Statistics gathered from disparate sources • Focussed on local health economy • Deliver comparison with national averages • Begins to paint a data picture
- 6. Working Smarter for Better Health Making the data into information • Dementia higher than national • Depression is above national • Schizophrenia admissions high • Self-harm high
- 7. Working Smarter for Better Health Underpinning the information with the evidence • Use of Mendeley to collaborate • Repository of evidence • Consistency of referencing style
- 8. Working Smarter for Better Health Evidence reviews • Based on narrative • Structured template • Brief summaries of content provided - what does it tell us • Focus on case studies • Links straight to documents
- 9. Working Smarter for Better Health Embedding evidence • Commissioning policies review, Multidisciplinary project team • Procedures of Limited Clinical Priority (PLCP)/Individual Exceptional Funding Request (IEFR) • Existing policies needed review • Offered to CCGs across Cheshire and Merseyside • 'Do once for many' • Tight deadlines
- 10. Working Smarter for Better Health Here we go again
- 11. Working Smarter for Better Health kieran.lamb@cmcsu.nhs.uk lis.edwards@cmcsu.nhs.uk Contact us at:
Editor's Notes
- Reliant on structured template. Summaries crucial, allow user to decide is the thing worth reading. Focus on case studies where possible reduced some of the waffle. Key thing though is link to documents but also local holding of them because the web moves. Less of a problem for some organisations than others.
- Priniciples of co-production used. Multidisciplinary team utilised to maximise use of individuals expertise within the project. Also provided a safe environment to challenge the evidence. IEFR evidence is supposedly provided by the clinician requesting the procedure, often no more than an authors name and date. Just a case of locating and doc supply. However trying to work on inclusion in the evidence location from the outset. Big issue with do once for many, the addendums and local variations. Built in postcode lottery! As ever need for information was like yesterday.