This document discusses personal health records (PHRs) and how they are evolving with web 2.0 technologies. PHRs allow patients to collect, manage, and share their own health data in a secure online record. While current PHR usage is low, proponents believe they can empower patients and improve care by giving individuals access to their records anywhere. PHRs may also help with public health monitoring and clinical research if patients opt to share select data. However, concerns around data accuracy, privacy, and interoperability between different PHR systems must still be addressed for their full potential to be realized.
Personal Health Records and Web 2.0: New Ways for Patients to Manage Health Data
1. Personal Health Record and web 2.0: a
new way for patients and citizen to
collect, handle, and share their own
health data
Eugenio Santoro
eugenio.santoro@marionegr.it
Laboratory of Medical Informatics
Department of Epidemiology
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
2. AHIMA Definition of PHR
"The personal health record (PHR) is an
electronic, universally available, lifelong
resource of health information needed by
individuals to make health decisions.
Individuals own and manage the information
in the PHR, which comes from the health care
provider and the individual. The PHR is
maintained in a secure and private
environment, with the individual determining
the rights of access. The PHR is separate
from and does not replace the legal record of
the provider.“
AHIMA e-HIM Personal Health Record Work Group. "The Role of the Personal Health Record
in the EHR." Journal of AHIMA 76, no.7 (July-August 2005): 64A-D.
http://www.webcitation.org/5Vlj7zE7EIFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
E. Santoro -
3. Personal Health Record – Key
points
• A PHR is different form an electronic health
record (EHR) that is maintained by the health
care provider/hospital/physician
• PHRs are stored in a private, secure,
centralized databases located on web servers
• A PHR is under control of the patient. The
owner of the PHR can decide:
- Which information are to be collected/uploaded
- Who can wiew them
- With whom share them (family
members/physicians ..)
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
4. Which health data a PHR should
include - 1
• Patient demographics (including name and
date of birth)
• Emergency contacts (family members,
physicians, specialists, dentists)
• Health insurance information
• Important events and hereditary conditions
in family history
• Opinions of specialists
• Important tests results (laboratory,
radiological, etc.)
AHIMA
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
5. Which health data a PHR should
include - 2
• Eye and dental records
• Correspondence between the patient and
his health providers
• Dates of significant illnesses and surgical
procedures
• Current medications and dosages
• Discharge summaries
• Medicine and allergy lists
• Immunization status and dates
• Data about life style and habits (e.g.
smoking, weight, height, bmi, etc.)
AHIMA
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
6. PHR - Data collection
• Manually by the owner of the PHR
• Automatically by the owner of the PHR
• home glucometer
• blood pressure readings
• other devices
• Other providers (if an agreement exists)
• pharmacies
• labs
• health care providers
• EHR/EMR
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
7. Some tools provided by the PHR
systems - 1
• Checking for drug interaction as soon as
medications are uploaded
• Checking for drug/allergies interaction
• Home monitoring and management of
health parameters (e.g. weekly/monthly
graph of blood pressure)
• Scheduling of appointments with
physicians
• Reminders for health screening programs
(diabetes, cancer, etc.)
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
8. Some tools provided by the PHR
systems - 2
• Medication refill and renewal
• Communications with the physician
(secure messaging)
• Community alerts and social networks
• Sharing with family members/physicians
• Links to reliable health information systems
for medical education
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
16. Usage of PHR systems - 1
• Consumers with online access to their health
information pay more attention to their health
• PHR usage (in US) is low (7%), but doubled
in two years.
• PHR users are young (11%), highly educated
(12% college graduated)and higher income
(13% with >75.000$), frequent Internet users
(12%), suffering from 3+ chronic conditions
(9%)
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION 2010 E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
17. Usage of PHR systems - 2
• Less educated, lower-income and chronically
ill patients report greater value from using a
PHR
• Two out of three Americans are concerned
about the privacy of their health information;
concern is reduced by experience with and
benefits received from a PHR.
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION 2010
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
18. Reasons limiting the use of the
PHR systems
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION 2010
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
19. Advantages – Patient/Consumer
• Complete medical history stored in one place
• Centralization of health data
• Access data from anywhere (e.g. while traveling)
• Access data in case of emergency (by himself or by
ER physicians)
• Automatic notification of scheduled activities (medical
visits, drug administration/assumption)
• Home care monitoring and self-management of own
health conditions
• Improving of the doctor-patients communication
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
20. Promises/Drivers of PHR
2. Preventing Medical Errors
“The single most important
way you can help to prevent
errors is to be an active
member of your health care
team. That means taking
part in every decision about
your health care. Research
shows that patients who are
more involved with their care
tend to get better results.“
(AHRQ)
PHRs can help to engage
patients in their care.
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
21. Advantages – Physician/Hospital
• Access to patients complete medical history
• Checking of drug interactions
• Limitation of medical errors
• Reduction of the cost of care (avoid duplication
of examinations or prescription of drug already
taken by the patient) in patients suffering from
chronic diseases
• Identification of patients at risk
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
22. Promises/Drivers of PHR
1. Public health, prevention,
behavior change
• PHRs as an entry point for
behavior change programs (e.g.
smoking cessation, obesity)
• PHRs as an entry point for
customized health
recommendations
• PHRs can be used as
surveillance tools
Evaluation of Influenza Prevention in the
Workplace Using a Personally Controlled
Health Record: Randomized Controlled Trial
Florence T Bourgeois, William Simons, Karen
Olson, John Brownstein, Kenneth Mandl
J Med Internet Res 2008 (Mar 14); 10(1):e5
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
23. Advantages – Reseacrh
• PHRs may be a particularly valuable to study
relationships between health behaviour and
outcomes
• PHR could be used to selection possible
candidates to be included in clinical trials based
on their health conditions (consent for this
secondary data use should be obtained by the
patient)
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
24. Disdvantages
• Data may be uncompleted, inaccurate, difficult
to verify, in particular when they are collected
by the patient
• High heterogeneity among the PHRs systems -
low interoperability between PHRs and
PHRs/EHRs systems
• (patient’s perceived feeling of) scarce security
and privacy about his/her health data
- Patients express concerns that the data could be
accessed by unauthorized people
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
25. Characteristics of PHR 2.0
“PHR 2.0” have “Web 2.0” design features that
enable / facilitate participation, collaboration,
and openess
- Model social relationships between individuals
- Open standards
- Acknowledge consumers as “prosumers”
- Ability for consumers to share parts of their health
records with anybody
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
27. Patientslikeme
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
28. Conclusions
• PHR’s are a fundamental means of
providing value driven healthcare
• Adoption rates are low but it is expected
they rise in the next years
• To obtain more advantages PHR systems
must be completely interoperable in order
to allow sharing of data between them
and between EHR systems
• PHR 2.0 could add further advantages
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010
29. Thank you
Eugenio Santoro
eugenio.santoro@marionegri.it
www.twitter.com/eugeniosantoro
http://eugeniosantoro.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/eugeniosantoro
http://www.slideshare.net/eugeniosantoro
Santoro E. “web 2.0 e medicina”. Roma 2009,
Il Pensiero Scientifico editore
E. Santoro - IFHRO 2010, November 18 2010