The document discusses risk management in StatoilHydro. It defines key terms like risk, threat, and opportunity. It outlines StatoilHydro's values and risk picture, including different types of risks. It describes the risk management process, which includes risk identification, assessment, response actions, and control. Tools for risk management include a risk module in PIMSWeb for input, use, and output of risk data. Risk management is important throughout a project's lifecycle to understand uncertainties and their potential impacts.
3. 3
- threats and opportunities !
We in StatoilHydro – Our Values
• Courageous
• Open
Courageous
Our values:
• Hands-on
• Caring
• Be imaginative, ambitious and stimulate new ideas
• Use foresight, and identify opportunities and challenges
• Challenge accepted truths and enter unfamiliar territory
• Make clear demands on each other and push for
constructive change
• Understand and manage risk
4. 4
Risk picture - StatoilHydro
• Market risk Described in:
o Strategic market risk • FR08
o Tactical market risk • FR08
o Credit risk • FR08
• Operational risk
o technical risk • FR02, FR03, FR06
o project risk • FR05
o reservoir risk • FR01
o health, safety, security and the
environment (HSE)
• FR10
o administrative risks • FR09, FR14, FR15, FR16.
o Country risk • FR08
o Reputational risk • FR08
o Code of conduct • FR18
5. 5
Definitions
Risk:
Any uncertainty that, if it occurs, would affect one or more
objectives. Risk is the product of probability and consequence.
Threat:
Any uncertainty that, if it
occurs,
would affect one or more
objectives negatively
Opportunity:
Any uncertainty that, if it
occurs,
would affect one or more
objectives positively
7. 7
Risk Management (ref.FR05)
• Risk Management shall be used actively throughout the project
development:
• Prior to DG 1, management of risks shall be established and
maintained as a continuous management process throughout the
project development process.
• Risk management shall be an integrated part of the management of a
project, where all project units shall contribute actively in the process.
• Requirements for Risk management shall be included in contracts and
purchase orders.
8. 8
Risk Management
Risk Analysis
Probability simulation based on:
- UM Top 10 List
- Economic planning assumptions
• Cost estimate
• Schedule estimate
• Total value chain
$ $
Risk Management
1
4 2
3
1. Identification
2. Assessment
3. Response Action
4. Response Control
10. Risk actions and quality control activities/PIMSWEB
Project Subprojects Contracts
Risk Identification Risk Action
Quality System
Audit
Contract/discipline
Examination
Assignment Notify Prepare Execute Report
Observation
s
Close-outFollow up
Risk Areas
Risk Assessment Risk Control
11. 11
2. Assessment
• Risk are ranked over dimensions: probability of occurrence,
potential consequences, manageability of outcome
• Specify cash impact
• Project core teams review sub-groups main risks and define
Project Top 10 List
• Raise Red flags when critical exposures identified
1. Identification
• Identify risks during functional brainstorming sessions
• Conduct analysis through total value chain for full project lifecycle
• Encourage and facilitate cross-learning trough similar projects
• Nominate RM coordinator to ensure QA and secure use of PIMS Web
4. Response Control
• Define and clearly communicate UM process so all
projects are aligned with corporate requirements,
regulations and integrate public expectations
• Reporting system allows leadership to be aware of main
uncertainties and enable control of work quality
• Third party knowledge is leveraged to develop Statoil
expertise
3. Response Action
• Define for each top 10 Risk mitigating actions & back-up plans
• Track response action in by responsible person or by action deadline
• RM coordinator reports progress to core team and ensure compliance with process
• Functional experts control quality of RA during CAR’s
Risk Management - Process
RM – Process
12. Risk areas
• Country / Politcal
• HSE, fraud and corruption
• Market / Contractual
• People / Organization
• Project execution / Operation
• Reserve base
• Strategic / Financial
• Technology / Technical
13. 15
Project
Cost
Project
SCHEDULE HSE SCOPE QUALITY Reputation
Minimal
(C1) <5 MNOK < 1 week
Minor Injuries,
Minor
Damages,
No Pollution None None
Small
(C2)
5-25
MNOK 1-2 weeks
Injuries,
Damages,
Minor
Pollution
Minor effects on
capacity/regularity
Local negative talk.
Minor local
Serious
(C3)
25-50
MNOK 2-4 weeks
Accidents,
Damages,
Pollutions
Effects on
capacity/regularity
Minor negative media coverage, some
drop in share price. Warning about
orders*)
from the authorities.
Major Local
Very
serious
(C4)
>50
MNOK >4 weeks
Serious
Accidents,
Serious
Damages,
Serious
Pollution
Major effects on
capacity/regularity
Serious negative media coverage, severe
drop in share price. Orders from the
authorities.
International
Consequences
25. Reports
• Lists – record by record
• Combined – Risk and action records together
• Graphics – graphical elements in report
• Statistic – frequency of use
28. 30
Why Risk Management ?
Approach
Action The action
aims to
reduce:
1 Eliminate Underground
cable
Build local power
plant
Probability
2 Reduce risk, pursue
opportunity
Increase gate
Plant small plants
Duplicate lines
Reduced growth
Probability
3 Transfer Insurance
Contract with other
Consequences
4 Accept and prepare Extra power
supply
Indicator light
Consequences
5 Ignore No action
29. 31
CAPEX Risk analysis
Estimate
Technical allowance
Facts ”Scope of work”
Experience
Frame agreement prices
Market growth
Phase
Uncertainty
Uncertainties execution
Concept
Identified elements managable
Identified elements not manageable
30. 32
• A value chain includes all the variables that affect the cash flow
• Each Risk in the value chain is described with a probability
distribution and linked to the economical model
• Dependencies between variables are taken into account
• Risk in project economy is calculated through Monte-Carlo
simulations
Risk Analysis - RiskMS
Risk Analysis on the value chain
31. 33
Model based
on SIAM
Monte Carlo
Simulation
Assessment
Risk
Assessment
Risk
Analysis
Model
development
Dependencies
Distributions
Project scope
NPV Range and
distribution
P(10), P(E) and
P(90)
Sensitivities
Analysis
Output Report
Expected NPV
Cumulative Chart
Certainty is 80,00% from 555,23 to 1 191,03
Mean = 872,37
,000
,250
,500
,750
1,000
0
125,2
250,5
375,7
501
381,94 661,26 940,59 1 219,91 1 499,24
501 Trials 495 Displayed
Forecast: NPV 8%(SIAM)
0,75
0,64
0,00
0,69
0
0,83
0,00
0
0
7,13
1,32
1,51
0,69
1,41
2,0
1,19
1,36
3,0
4,2
15,33
Downside
Upside
Higher Value
Chain Focus
V
A
L
U
E
C
H
A
I
N
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
Drilling Risk
Reservoir Risk
CAPEX Risk
OPEX Risk
Transportation
Risk
Market Risk
Other Risk
Tax/fiscal Risk
IDENTIFIED
UNC.
ELEMENTS
R
I
S
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
Risk Analysis - RiskMS
Risk Analysis – RiskMS
Stormens herjinger
Grave ned kabelen
Hugge ned mer rundt – større
Alternative linje traseer
Nødaggregat
Forsikring, alternativ tilbydere
Fly over med gift/vekst hemmende
Lys som viser hvor feilen ligger
=&gt; Ny teknologi - trådløst
Identified elements:
HSE
Disposal
Security
Personnel security
Risk
Geo hazard
Availabilty
HSE knowledge in the country
External factors
Authorities
Timely commercial agreements on critical path
Government enactment new laws / regulations
Cost consolidation/rights/tax
Tender process - lead time authorities, how to reduce lead time
Loosing the license to operate
License period extension
Business ethics and transparency
Partners
Opportunities in other licenses
Field unitization
Alignment on operatorships
Organisations
Agreement with plant owners / commercial agreements
Operation
Requirements
Knowledge of technical and operational experience
Shut downs
Existing facility
Interface
Selection of landing points
Similar projects
Operating facilities
Execution
Supplier market situation - limited recourses
Availability of personnel internally
Availability of expat. personnel
Availability of local competence
Local offices capabilities
Operation preparations/ lack of onshore base
Fragmented organization
Several work locations
Requirements for local country
Time/Schedule
Geo hazard survey timely
Lack of understanding of project complexity
Parallel activities
Dependencies
Contractor market
Cooperation
Contract Strategy
Geology & Reservoir
Resources
Development at low resource estimate
Drainage strategy
Production rate for formation water
Production and utilisation of oil zone
Modelling
Produce ability in production wells
Understanding the reservoir distribution
Drilling & Well
No of wells & type
Complexity
Rig market
Availability of rig towards to DG1
Technology
Need for development
Concept development
Disposal of formation water
Complexity
Contractors
Economical assumptions
Opportunities with onshore Hub
Exchange rate
Rate of return
Market & Business
Prices
Sale expectations
Gas export?
Business strategy
Balanced value chain
PEOPS aligned with market situation
Advantages Risk MS
Flexible, Covers the Total Value Chain, Stochastic (quantitative – the users need to quantify uncertainties), Integrated with Siam, Focusing interfaces
Disadvantages with Risk MS
Time-consuming complex needs competence and training, needs modelling competence in MS Excel to get a “tailor-made” project model
Experience:
Ownership, Visualization of responsibility, interface cooperation, quantification of Risk elements, total value chain perspective
Hva kreves
Simulation and statistical competence, modelling experience in MS Excel, knowledge to Siam